Next Article in Journal
The Evaluation of 17 Gastrointestinal Tumor Markers Reveals Prognosis Value for MUC6, CK17, and CD10 in Gallbladder-Cancer Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Patient Centricity and Advancing Innovation in Clinical Research with Virtual Randomized Clinical Trials (vRCTs)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Innovative TGA/Chemometric Approach for Forensic Purposes: The Estimation of the Time since Death in Contaminated Specimens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Time Flies—Age Grading of Adult Flies for the Estimation of the Post-Mortem Interval

1
Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Goethe-University, 60323 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
2
Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Sezione di Scienze Medico Forensi, Università di Firenze, 50134 Firenze, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(2), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020152
Submission received: 11 December 2020 / Revised: 18 January 2021 / Accepted: 19 January 2021 / Published: 21 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in the Forensic Diagnosis)

Abstract

:
The estimation of the minimum time since death is one of the main applications of forensic entomology. This can be done by calculating the age of the immature stage of necrophagous flies developing on the corpse, which is confined to approximately 2–4 weeks, depending on temperature and species of the first colonizing wave of flies. Adding the age of the adult flies developed on the dead body could extend this time frame up to several weeks when the body is in a building or closed premise. However, the techniques for accurately estimating the age of adult flies are still in their beginning stages or not sufficiently validated. Here we review the current state of the art of analysing the aging of flies by evaluating the ovarian development, the amount of pteridine in the eyes, the degree of wing damage, the modification of their cuticular hydrocarbon patterns, and the increasing number of growth layers in the cuticula. New approaches, including the use of age specific molecular profiles based on the levels of gene and protein expression and the application of near infrared spectroscopy, are introduced, and the forensic relevance of these methods is discussed.

1. Introduction

The age estimation of necrophagous blow fly larvae and pupae as a function of ambient temperature and species is the key task of forensic entomology when it comes to the identification of the minimum post-mortem interval (PMImin), which is the time between the first insect colonization of a body and its discovery [1,2]. As adult blow flies are able to colonize a corpse within minutes after death, age estimation of their juvenile stages may yield “on-the-day” data for the PMImin even several weeks post mortem. They are therefore the most important diagnostic tool in the scientific estimation of time since death in forensic medicine. An even greater extension of this period “several weeks post-mortem” would be nevertheless a great success.
Quantifying the weathering and chemical degradation of empty fly puparia (the shells, in which the transformation of the maggot via the pupal stage into the adult fly takes place) discovered at a scene of a crime could be one opportunity, but relies on Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry methods and equipment, and is still tentative, as the weathering varies among species. Moreover, puparia might be overlooked due to the tendency of maggots to seek sheltered places to pupate and therefore not be collected by an untrained investigator. Last but not least, a variety of different methods should always be considered in order to minimize the problem of variability and natural noise of biological systems or living animals. Just as different methods of age determination of juvenile necrophagous insects (further breeding to the adult stage, length measurements of larvae, etc.) improve the accuracy of forensic entomological expertise, different techniques can also usefully complement each other in the analysis of the remains of the necrophagous fauna. Adult flies at the scene offer an important complement and support here [3,4,5]. Senescence or aging is the progressive deterioration in the physiological state of an organism over time that culminates in death [6,7]. In the adult fly, it is linked with various morphological and molecular variations, and by using these variations for the aging specimens, which remain on the scene of the body after finishing their development, could open a new door to the estimation of the PMImin. This applies especially to indoor scenes, where the majority of routine cases of insect infested bodies are located [8], and where hatched flies have difficulty leaving the room due to closing conditions. While under field conditions, a distinction between flies just arriving and those which developed on the body is difficult to achieve, at indoor scenes many of the flies originating from the cadaver may be still present at the scene for several weeks [9], and demonstrated that it is possible to establish the origin of a population of such flies at a crime scene by means of a morphology examination. As adult flies might reach ages of up to 68 days [10], adding their age to the time required for larval development and metamorphosis could extend the calculable period by several weeks (Figure 1). The present review summarizes the current state of the art of estimating the age of adult flies and evaluates possible problems and pitfalls regarding techniques and case work.

2. Age-Grading Targets

2.1. Morphology

2.1.1. Reproductive System

Examining qualitative or quantitative changes in the reproductive morphology of an insect is one of the oldest methods of age grading. Morphological changes in the reproductive system of maturing flies are well studied and have been described in several reviews [12,13,14]. Only few studies demonstrated age dependent changes in the male reproductive system. Ponlawat and Harrington [15] showed, e.g., a positive correlation of the number of spermatozoa with age, which also correlates with body size in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Mahmood and Reisen [16] found that the number of total and mature spermatocysts in the mosquito Anopheles culicifacies (Diptera: Culicidae) declined significantly with age, but also noted that the changes in males may be reversible after a rest period and are therefore misleading. Studies on age dependent changes in males of forensically relevant Diptera like blow flies are still missing. Instead, age estimation of various Diptera species focuses on the female ovarian development [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] e.g., by evaluating the stages of egg development [19] or the examination of ovarioles for follicular relicts to determine the number of ovarian cycles [25]. Krafsur et al. [26] applied age-grading techniques based on ovarian morphology of the muscid stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans and Sutherland [27] defining age categories to distinguish between newly-emerged, nulliparous and uniparous females of S. calcitrans and females that have reproduced twice (biparous) or more (pauciparous). This kind of staging is also established for forensically relevant Muscidae or blow flies like Chrysomya spp. [28,29,30,31] The dependence on protein sources for egg formation and the absence of oviposition sites, which could delay the egg formation, but also the numbers of ovarian cycles in female flies, are a disadvantage of these methods, as they are the source of significant variation [12]. Moreover, Gillies and Wilkes [32] highlighted the lack of reproducibility of this technique across species and between technicians during their work on Anopheles spp.

2.1.2. Cuticle Growth Layers

Cuticle growth layers are on the internal cuticular projections of the exoskeleton on which muscles attach and are the result of the cuticle deposition rhythm, which is under control of circadian clocks in epidermal cells, as shown for Drosophila melanogaster [33,34]. After eclosion, epidermal cells secrete additional material in order to thicken the endocuticle, which is, beside epi- and exocuticle, part of the exoskeleton. Hence, counting those regularly growing cuticle layers seems to be an appropriate age estimation tool, as they are comparable with annual rings of trees, but occur here on a daily basis [35]. Schlein and Gratz [36,37] demonstrated a daily cuticle growth at two thoracic structures for various Diptera species like Sarcophaga falculata, Calliphora erythrocephala (=vicina), Glossina austeni, Culex pipiens molestus, Aedes aegypti, and Anopheles gambiae. Johnston and Ellison [38] observed similar growth layers at one of these structures in different strains of Drosophila sp., and Tyndale-Biscoe and Kitching [39] used cuticular growth rings to determine age in field studies on the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. They are visible in a light microscope and, according to [40], it was found that for the screwworm Cochliomyia hominivorax, agreement with known age was within plus or minus one day. However, the latter study was performed only on laboratory-reared specimens and differentiated between two age cohorts (6 versus 15 days). A detailed overview on this topic regarding various insect families and species is given by Neville [41,42]. Even if the great simplicity of the method at first sight is convincing, one should keep in mind that there is a certain abiotic bias (e.g., light-dark regime and temperature adjustments), moreover the classification/identification of the different cuticle layers is not a simple routine task. Last but not least, these growth bands might be visible until a certain age only.

2.1.3. Wing Fray

Insects accumulate small wing injuries (so called wing frays) [43] during their life time, which can be used for evaluating the age of the specimen [44,45]. This method was already applied in a variety of fly families like Glossinidae [46], Scatophagidae [47], or Psychomyiidae [48]. Hayes et al. [44] adapted this method for forensically relevant blow flies. The authors developed a “wing fray index”, which comprises the distance of missing parts of wing margins and of the length of the posterior cross vein. Davies [49] published a study on Calliphora vicina where he defined five classes or states of wing fray based mainly on the number of indents on the fringe of the wings and the percentage of its damage. Beside the potential benefit of this technique, there are serious shortcomings, as the amount of wing fray is not solely linked to the age of the fly, but to its life history in terms of activity and wing movement, predator attack, and intraspecific interactions [44]. This is the reason why Beutler et al. [9] recommend the use of wing fray mainly to determine if flies sampled at an actual crime scene had developed on the body or are wild flies attracted to the body (showing a high degree of wing fray), but not as a sound tool for estimating the age of a fly.

2.2. Biochemistry

The numerous metabolic processes in flies leave traces that can sometimes be tracked and used as time markers.

2.2.1. Pteridines

Pteridines derive from a pyrimidine-pyrazine ring and are 2-amino-4-hydroxy derivatives [50,51]. They had been first identified by Hopkins in the wings of pierid butterflies in 1895 [52]. Together with ommochromes, pteridines represent the pigments in the ommatidia of the insect compound eye [50,51] where they are either coloured or colourless. Their stability allows for their long-term accumulation in the eyes of Diptera. The so called drosopterins contribute to the red [53], and sepiapterin and isosepiapterin to the yellow-brown pigmentation [51]. Some pteridines have been considered to be just degradation products [51], but some authors suggested that they may function as a light filter in the near UV and blue regions [51,54]. In 1965, Patat [54] studied pteridine patterns in the eyes of the blow fly Calliphora erythrocephala (=vicina) and observed that pteridines showed age-dependent quantitative changes in their composition. From eclosion of the adult flies to Day 10, the amount of pteridines increased linearly and thereafter showed constant levels. Summers and Howells [55] demonstrated that in wild type and eye colour mutants of another blow fly, Lucilia cuprina, the pteridine sepiapterin increases shortly before eclosion of the fly and steadily increased thereafter.
In a study by Mail et al. [56], pteridine accumulation was firstly described as an age-grading parameter for the adult stages of the blood feeding Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). In this study, pteridines were shown to increase consistently in a linear manner and did not exhibit constant levels at a certain point as described by Patat [54] and Summers and Howells [55] for blow fly species. For a number of dipteran species, pteridine amounts were measured as a function of age, temperature, and sex. While an age dependent, (curvi-) linear increase was demonstrated for a broad range of Diptera, some exceptions exist, such as for the Culicidae species [57,58]. Recently, Bernhardt et al. [59] and Dimitrov et al. [60] presented for both sexes of the two forensically most important blow flies of central Europe, L. sericata and C. vicina, key reference values for the age-related accumulation of pteridine at room temperature. Cammack et al. [61] analysed pteridine accumulation for the forensically relevant blow flies Chrysomya megacephala, Cochliomyia macellaria, and Phormia regina, when reared at temperatures ranging from 5 to 35 °C. Age could be estimated for almost all temperature–sex combinations, underlining the promising usability of this method.
Due to the curvilinear increase in some species, an age-estimation may not be applicable for the complete adult stage. Moreover, Křemenová et al. [62] showed for several bed bug species that the accumulation of particular pteridines varied between different populations and rearing temperatures. As pteridines have unique absorption spectra, there is the potential for a fast and low-cost quantification by spectrofluorometry [59,60,61]. However, simple fluorimeters have a low laboratory specific sensitivity and may not be able to withstand testing or validation under field conditions. More sophisticated methods like high-pressure liquid chromatography may be better suited to provide reproducible results even under environmental = natural conditions. Moreover, the authors stated that more than one standard should be applied and measured simultaneously to subsequently select those that show consistent changes over time [62]. In the end, however, the effort should pay off, as such a decrease could be observed over a very long period of time: Ref. [63] proved that the ant Platythyrea punctata shows a decrease in pteridine levels over time until 70–80 days of age, and if such long lasting aging processes could also be elucidated in detail in flies, this would be a great benefit in FE.

2.2.2. Cuticular Hydrocarbons

In insects, a thin lipid wax layer mainly composed of hydrocarbons, alcohols, waxes, acylglycerides, phospholipids, and glycolipids covers the cuticle [64,65,66,67]. Insect cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC) often consist of complex mixtures of straight chain, unsaturated, and methyl-branched components with up to 40+ carbons. They function to restrict water loss and desiccation, and they facilitate chemical communication in many species [64,68,69,70,71,72]. In social insects, this layer, e.g., functions in nestmate recognition, task decision control, or caste recognition [72]. It is secreted by oenocytes, which are of ectodermal origin and vary in size, number, and anatomical location among species [73].
Jackson et al. [67] compared the CHC composition of newly eclosed, 7-days-old, and 19-days-old adults of the flesh fly Sarcophaga bullata. They showed that the total amount of CHC’s increased with age, especially CHC’s with a chain length between C25 and C32. Uebel et al. [74,75,76,77] also described age-dependent changes in the cuticular CHC composition for Musca autumnalis, Fannia canicularis, Fannia pusio, and Fannia femoralis. In their study on Drosophila virilis (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Jackson and Bartelt [78] showed that the quantity of total CHC’s increased 3-fold between Day 0 and Day 4 in both sexes, but after Day 4 the quantity increased 2-fold in male flies, while it remained unchanged in females until Day 8. The authors also observed that the average chain length of CHC’s decreased with increasing age [78]. In the following years, the first blow flies of forensic interest were investigated regarding age-dependent changes of their CHC composition, but these findings were not linked with PMImin estimations [79,80,81,82,83]. In 2008, Roux et al. [84] described CHC assays as potential age-grading tools for juvenile and adult stages of the forensically relevant blow flies Protophormia terraenovae, Calliphora vomitoria, and C. vicina. Later on, only a few studies on CHC’s as age-grading tools of adult blow flies like C. macellaria, Chrysomya rufifacies, and Chrysomya putoria have been published [66,85]. However, their relevance in forensic entomological casework is low, since age-dependent changes are, at least partly, minor, and clear CHC profiles on a daily basis have not been presented yet. Bernhardt et al. [86] analysed the CHC n-pentacosane (nC25) on the legs of the adult blow flies L. sericata and C. vicina with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry at room temperature until day 20 post-emergence. The amounts of nC25 increased linearly in both species, but revealed differences between the two sexes in L. sericata. The authors provide sex-specific equations for both species for the prediction of fly age. There are indications for abiotic effects, such as diet, temperature, humidity, and laboratory-rearing-effects [64,87,88], which may have an impact on the CHC abundance. Despite that, CHC-based age-prediction models for mosquitos have been validated against field caught specimens and seem robust up to about 15 days [89].
One of the most recent innovations for differentiating a variety of insect traits (age, species, and infection) based on chemical compounds has been the use of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) [90]. NIRS measures the absorption of organic compounds within a sample using an electromagnetic spectrum in the near-infrared region (350–2500 nm) [91] and subsequent analysis may detect compositional differences between samples according to the near-infrared energy absorbed [90]. It is difficult to attribute specific signals to particular chemical signatures, but it seems that age-related degradation of, e.g., surface CHC’s on insect exoskeletons creates unique absorption spectra [41,92]. This is the proposed basis of the capacity of NIRS-based models to place laboratory-reared, adult An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes into binary age categories (e.g., less than and greater than 7 days old) with a reported accuracy of approximately 80% [93,94,95]. NIRS has been described as an age-grading technique by Perez-Mendoza et al. [92] in studies on Musca domestica, Stomoxys calcitrans, and Musca autumnalis. They used whole flies, fresh and dried heads, and identified age-dependent changes in -CH3, -CH2, and -CH functional groups of not further described molecules. However, the authors stated that their calibration model for regression equations is not transferable, since they are unique for each instrument. Villet and Amendt [96] suggested age estimation of adult necrophagous fly species with NIRS, but unfortunately no forensic motivated studies were performed until today. Voss et al. [97] published a study on reflection profiles of blow fly pupae, including infrared wavelengths, for the age and species identification. Recently, developments around NIRS technology have improved [98,99] and moreover expanded to related methods using the midinfrared region (MIRS; 2500–25,000 nm) for spectral analysis [100]. This wavelength penetrates less deeply into the target than NIRS, and is easier to handle in terms of the biochemical differences identified. Spectral outputs are also less sensitive to the moisture content of the sample. Early evidence for yellow fever transmitting Aedes aegypti, derived from 2- and 10-day-old, laboratory-reared specimens, showed that these can be separated with 0–3% prediction errors [100,101].

2.3. Genetics and Proteomics

2.3.1. Genes

Gene expression can be measured by using reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and by this, correlation between the transcription products of multiple genes and age-dependent expression patterns can be examined. Gene expression analysis as an age-grading tool for forensically important blow flies so far is exclusively performed on immature stages by studying changes in mRNA levels during development because genes are temporally up- and down-regulated to achieve appropriate progress in development [102,103,104,105]. First data of gene expression patterns for adult stages of Diptera were obtained by studies on D. melanogaster [106,107,108,109] and on Ae. aegypti [110]. Cook et al. [110,111] identified orthologous D. melanogaster genes in Ae. aegypti and Marinotti et al. [112] published a genome-wide analysis of gene expression in the adult stages of Anopheles gambiae and detected age related expression patterns, which depended on blood meals. Extensive genomics work on Drosophila revealed several more candidate genes, which may be worth analysing in blow flies and in other forensically relevant taxa as well. One possible target is the genetic background of the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is known to be involved in a multitude of physiological processes. Bednářová et al. [113] showed recently that old D. melanogaster specimens exhibited different levels of dopamine, which additionally are sex-dependent. Already DeLuca et al. [114] mentioned that genes which are important for the synthesis of dopamine producing enzymes (like Ddc) are potential candidates for life span analysis, and Carnes et al. [115] found significant differences in gene expression with the population and the age for D. melanogaster populations. However, the method requires extensive target identification and optimization and from a forensic perspective the technological effort, the costs, and the need for species-specific profiling do not make it seem realistic that this method will prevail in routine applications. Recently, Martinson [116] provided groundwork by establishing sex and developmental-specific gene sets for the flesh fly S. bullata, based on RNA-sequencing. This work can be seen in one line with various other recent transcriptomic and genomics studies focusing on carrion-feeding flies of the forensically relevant blow fly genera Lucilia and Chrysomya [117,118,119,120]. However, despite the fact that there is a growing body of literature, there are no applicable data sets for estimating the age of an adult blow fly due to gene expression and/or RNA data.

2.3.2. Proteins

Age-dependent changes to the expression of proteins also provide biomarkers for age grading. An earlier study by Fleming et al. [121] analysed quantitative protein expression patterns during the life-span of D. melanogaster by means of two-dimensional protein gel patterns at “young”, “middle”, and “old” flies and found significant age-related quantitative changes. Much research is done on mosquitos, as their age is a crucial determinant of their ability to transmit pathogens and their resistance to insecticides. Hugo et al. [122] tested proteomic biomarkers as possible age-grading tools in Ae. aegypti and could detect four promising candidate proteins like, e.g., actin depolymerising factor, which decreased in adultsbetween Day 1 and Day 34 after eclosion. Similar results have been presented by Iovinella et al. [123] for Aedes albopictus and by Chang [124] for Bactrocera dorsalis. Sikulu et al. [125] identified several proteins with characteristic changes in abundance in both A. gambiae and A. stephensi during their aging process. Rabani et al. [126] recently published a study on two forensically relevant taxa but in a non-forensic context. Moreover, they were just examining larval stages. No studies on adult specimens of forensically relevant flies exist which investigate changes on protein expression level in an age-related manner.

3. Conclusions

The age determination of adult flies could extend the day-exact identification of a PMImin period by several weeks, but many of the current methods of determining their age seem not yet robust enough to meet forensic requirements. This can be seen in the possibilities of the promising genetic methods: Tomberlin et al. [127] suggested that quantitative genetic studies may contribute to understand variation in phenotypes and to what extent phenotypes are affected by individual genetic differences and by their interaction with the environment. These interactions of genotype, phenotype, and environment are one of the most exciting, but also difficult, challenges in the near future when it comes to age grading of adult flies in a forensic context.
The application of a single method for age estimation of an adult fly seems to be moderately successful and may provide a rough idea of a specimen’s age, but not on a daily basis. Reliable age estimation of adult flies might be achieved in the future by the simultaneous application of several methods, as shown by Wall et al. [23], Perez-Mendoza et al. [92], Moon and Krafsur [128], or Butler et al. [129]. Pteridine, CHC assays, and the evaluating of cuticular bands and ovarian development are currently most promising (and mainly inexpensive) (Table 1) and may be performed with the head, legs, wings, thorax, and abdomen of just one and the same specimen. Being able to use the same sample for many different methods is one of the great advantages of age determination of adult flies (Figure 2), together with the rather easy sampling and storage of the evidence: Dry storage at room temperature (if possible, in the dark) seems to be recommended for many of the methods, at least if a timely transfer is ensured. After receiving the samples, the material can be examined morphologically and biochemically without much preparation and provide initial results within 24 h.
The question that remains to be answered is whether the flies studied are actually the F1 generation of the population developing on the corpse. If the adults have little wing damage and a high proportion of males, this would indicate an F1 or later generation of adults, i.e., that they developed on the body [9]. If there are mostly female with a significant amount of wing damage, investigators could conclude that these flies came from the outside. The flies’ nutritional history might also reveal whether they developed on the scene. Bernhardt et al. [130] compared the isotope signatures (here: The stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N)) of tissue from humans and 12 additional vertebrates, and from the flies developing on these tissues of the adult flies. They concluded that the fly patterns mirrored the isotope signatures for the respective tissues on which they developed as larvae. The authors recommend that the isotope signatures for the body in question should also be determined so that they can be compared with the signatures from the entomological specimens from the crime scene.
Last but not least, an important extension of the optional analysis of adult flies is the clarification of the extent to which the different methods or targets also apply to dead specimens. As there may not be a source of water or sugar to supply emerging flies, and they frequently fly to a window where they dehydrate quickly, the sampling of adult flies at a scene will most likely be of dead specimens. Here, proteomics and genomics are not promising tools, but, e.g., pteridines and NIRS could be still useful.

Author Contributions

J.A. and V.B. (Victoria Bernhardt) conceived the paper and conducted the literature search, J.A., V.B. (Valentina Bugelli), and V.B. (Victoria Bernhardt) wrote and critically revised the manuscript, gave final approval for the version to be published, and are responsible for all aspects of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lena Lutz for designing the graphic in Figure 2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, K.G.V. A Manual of Forensic Entomology; British Museum (Natural History): London, UK; Cornell University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amendt, J.; Richards, C.S.; Campobasso, C.P.; Zehner, R.; Hall, M.J.R. Forensic entomology: Applications and limitations. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2011, 7, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhu, G.-H.; Yu, X.-J.; Xie, L.-X.; Luo, H.; Wang, D.; Lv, J.-Y.; Xu, X.-H. Time of Death Revealed by Hydrocarbons of Empty Puparia of Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) (Diptera: Calliphoridae): A Field Experiment. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhu, G.-H.; Jia, Z.-J.; Yu, X.-J.; Wu, K.-S.; Chen, L.-S.; Lv, J.-Y.; Benbow, M.E. Predictable weathering of puparial hydrocarbons of necrophagous flies for determining the postmortem interval: A field experiment using Chrysomya rufifacies. Int. J. Legal Med. 2017, 131, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moore, H.E.; Pechal, J.L.; Benbow, M.E.; Drijfhout, F.P. The potential use of cuticular hydrocarbons and multivariate analysis to age empty puparial cases of Calliphora vicina and Lucilia sericata. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Grotewiel, M.S.; Martin, I.; Bhandari, P.; Cook-Wiens, E. Functional senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Ageing Res. Rev. 2005, 4, 372–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Williams, P.D.; Day, T.; Fletcher, Q.; Rowe, L. The shaping of senescence in the wild. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bugelli, V.; Forni, D.; Bassi, L.A.; Di Paolo, M.; Marra, D.; Lenzi, S.; Toni, C.; Giusiani, M.; Domenici, R.; Gherardi, M.; et al. Forensic entomology and the estimation of the minimum time since death in indoor cases. J. For. Sci. 2015, 60, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beutler, M.; Hart, A.; Hall, M.J.R. The use of wing fray and sex ratios to determine the origin of flies at an indoor crime scene. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 307, 110104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ujvari, B.; Wallman, J.F.; Madsen, T.; Whelan, M.; Hulbert, A.J. Experimental studies of blowfly (Calliphora stygia) longevity: A little dietary fat is beneficial but too much is detrimental. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2009, 154, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marchenko, M.I. Medicolegal relevance of cadaver entomofauna for the determination of the time of death. Forensic Sci. Int. 2001, 120, 89–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hayes, E.J.; Wall, R. Age-grading adult insects: A review of techniques. Physiol. Entomol. 1999, 24, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tyndale-Biscoe, M. Age-grading methods in adult insects: A review. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1984, 74, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lehane, M.J. Determining the age of an insect. Parasitol. Today 1985, 1, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ponlawat, A.; Harrington, L.C. Age and Body Size Influence Male Sperm Capacity of the Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2007, 44, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mahmood, F.; Reisen, W.K. Anopheles culicifacies: Effects of age on the male reproductive system and mating ability of virgin adult mosquitoes. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1994, 8, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Adams, T.; Hintz, A. Relationship of age, ovarian development, and the corpus allatum to mating in the house-fly Musca domestica. J. Insect Physiol. 1969, 15, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Spradbery, J.P.; Vogt, W.G.; Sands, D.P.A.; Drewett, N. Ovarian development rates in the Old World screw-worm fly Chrysomya bezziana. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1991, 58, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tyndale-Biscoe, M.; Hughes, R.D. Changes in the female reproductive system as age indicators in the bushfly Musca vetustissima Wlk. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1969, 59, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lachance, L.E.; Bruns, S.B. Oogenesis and radiosensitivity in Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Biol. Bull. 1963, 124, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mahmood, F.; Crans, W.J. Ovarian development and parity determination in Culiseta melanura (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1998, 35, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Clift, A.D.; McDonald, F.J.D. Morphology of the internal reproductive system of Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and a method of determining the age of both sexes. Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 1973, 2, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wall, R.; Langley, P.A.; Morgan, K.L. Ovarian development and pteridine accumulation for age determination in the blowfly Lucilia sericata. J. Insect Physiol. 1991, 37, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McDonald, R.S.; Borden, J.H. The relationship of age and ovarian development to mating of Delia antiqua (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Physiol. Entomol. 1995, 20, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vogt, W.G.; Woodburn, T.L.; Tyndale-Biscoe, M.; Anderson, J.R.; Miller, T.A.; Treece, R.E.; Rosay, B.; Smith, T.A. A method of age determination in Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) using cyclic changes in the female reproductive system. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1974, 64, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Krafsur, E.; Moon, R.; Lysyk, T. Adult age and reproductive success in stable fly populations (Diptera: Muscidae). Can. Entomol. 1994, 126, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sutherland, B. Physiological age determination in female Stomoxys calcitrans Linnaeus (Diptera: Muscidae). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 1980, 47, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  28. Butler, S.M.; Moon, R.D.; Hinkle, N.C.; Millar, J.G.; McElfresh, J.S.; Mullens, B.A. Gonotrophic development and survival in field populations of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) at dairies in California, Minnesota, and Georgia, and the relationship of fly age to relative abundance of (Z)-9-tricosene (muscalure). J. Med. Entomol. 2013, 50, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rita, M.P.; Avancini, A.P. do Prado Oogenesis in Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Intern. J. Insect Morph. Emb. 1986, 5, 375–384. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rita, M.P.; Silveira Gerson, A.R. Age structure and abundance in populations of muscoid flies from a poultry facility in Southeast Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2000, 95, 259–264. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sontigun, N.; Sukontason, K.L.; Klong-klaew, T.; Sangob, S.; Samerjai, C.; Somboon, P.; Sukontason, K. Bionomics of the oriental latrine fly Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius) (Diptera: Calliphoridae): Temporal fluctuation and reproductive potential. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gillies, M.T.; Wilkes, T.J. A study of the age-composition of populations of Anopheles gambiae Giles and A. funestus Giles in North-Eastern Tanzania. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1965, 56, 237–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ito, C.; Goto, S.G.; Shiga, S.; Tomioka, K.; Numata, H. Peripheral circadian clock for the cuticle deposition rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 8446–8451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ito, C.; Goto, S.G.; Tomioka, K.; Numata, H. Temperature entrainment of the circadian cuticle deposition rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Rhythm. 2011, 26, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Neville, A.C. Daily growth layers in locust rubber-like cuticle influenced by an external rhythm. J. Insect Physiol. 1963, 9, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schlein, Y.; Gratz, N.G. Age determination of some flies and mosquitos by daily growth layers of skeletal apodemes. Bull. World Health Organ. 1972, 47, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Schlein, Y.; Gratz, N.G. Determination of the age of some anopheline mosquitos by daily growth layers of skeletal apodemes. Bull. World Health Organ. 1973, 49, 371–375. [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnston, J.S.; Ellison, J.R. Exact age determination in laboratory and field-caught Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 1982, 28, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tyndale-Biscoe, M.; Kitching, R. Cuticular bands as age criteria in the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1974, 64, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ellison, J.R.; Hampton, E.N. Age determination using the apodeme structure in adult screwworm flies (Cochliomyia hominivorax). J. Insect Physiol. 1982, 28, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Neville, A.C. Daily cuticular growth layers and the teneral stage in adult insects: A review. J. Insect Physiol. 1983, 29, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Neville, A.C. Biology of the Arthropod Cuticle; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hargrove, J.W. A model for the relationship between wing fray and chronological and ovarian ages in tsetse (Glossina spp.). Med. Vet. Entomol. 2020, 34, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hayes, E.J.; Wall, R.; Smith, K.E. Measurement of age and population age structure in the blowfly, Lucilia sericata (Meigen) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J. Insect Physiol. 1998, 44, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Burkhard, D.U.; Ward, P.I.; Blanckenhorn, W.U. Using age grading by wing injuries to estimate size-dependent adult survivorship in the field: A case study of the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. Ecol. Entomol. 2002, 27, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Allsopp, R. Wing fray in Glossina morsitans centralis Machado (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1985, 75, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Otronen, M. Effects of seasonal variation in operational sex ratio and population density on the mating success of different sized and aged males in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1996, 8, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Petersson, E.; Hasselrot, A.T. Mating and nectar feeding in the psychomyiid caddis fly Tinodes waeneri. Aquat. Insects 1994, 16, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Davies, L. Delayed egg production and a possible group effect in the blowfly Calliphora vicina. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1998, 12, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ziegler, I. Pterine als Wirkstoffe und Pigmente. Ergeb. Der Physiol. Biol. Chem. Und Exp. Pharmakol. 1965, 56, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ziegler, I.; Harmsen, R. The Biology of Pteridines in Insects. Adv. Insect Phys. 1970, 6, 139–203. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hopkins, F.G. The pigments of Pieridae: A contribution to the study of excretory substances which function in ornament. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 1895, 186, 661–682. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kim, H.; Kim, K.; Yim, J. Biosynthesis of drosopterins, the red eye pigments of Drosophila melanogaster. IUBMB Life 2013, 65, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Patat, U. Über das Pterinmuster der Facettenaugen von Calliphora erythrocephala. Z. Vgl. Physiol. 1965, 51, 103–134. [Google Scholar]
  55. Summers, K.M.; Howells, A.J. Pteridines in wild type and eye colour mutants of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochem. 1980, 10, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mail, T.S.; Chadwick, J.; Lehane, M.J. Determining the age of adults of Stomoxys calcitrans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1983, 73, 501–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lardeux, F.; Ung, A.; Chebret, M. Spectrofluorometers are not adequate for aging Aedes and Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) using pteridine fluorescence. J. Med. Entomol. 2000, 37, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Penilla, R.P.; Rodriguez, M.H.; Lopez, A.D.; Viader-Salvado, J.M.; Sanchez, C.N. Pteridine concentrations differ between insectary-reared and field-collected Anopheles albimanus mosquitoes of the same physiological age. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2002, 16, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bernhardt, V.; Hannig, L.; Kinast, R.; Verhoff, M.A.; Rothweiler, F.; Zehner, R.; Amendt, J. Quantitative pteridine fluorescence analysis: A possible age-grading technique for the adult stages of the blow fly Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J. Insect Physiol. 2017, 98, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dimitrov, R.E.; Amendt, J.; Rothweiler, F.; Zehner, R. Age determination of the adult blow fly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) through quantitative pteridine fluorescence analysis. Forensic Sci. Med. Pat. 2020, 16, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cammack, J.A.; Reiskind, M.H.; Guisewite, L.M.; Denning, S.S.; Watson, D.W. Quantifying pteridines in the heads of blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae): Application for forensic entomology. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 280, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Křemenová, J.; Balvin, O.; Otti, O.; Pavonic, M.; Reinhardt, K.; Šimek, Z.; Bartonička, T. Identification and age-dependence of pteridines in bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) and bat bugs (C. pipistrelli) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10146. [Google Scholar]
  63. Hartmann, C.; Heinze, J.; Bernadou, A. Age-dependent changes in cuticular color and pteridine levels in a clonal ant. J. Insect Physiol. 2019, 118, 103943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Drijfhout, F.P. Cuticular Hydrocarbons: A New Tool in Forensic Entomology? In Current Concepts in Forensic Entomology; Amendt, J., Campobasso, C.P., Goff, M.L., Grassberger, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 179–203. [Google Scholar]
  65. Goodrich, B.S. Cuticular lipids of adults and puparia of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina (Wied.). J. Lipid Res 1970, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Braga, M.V.; Pinto, Z.T.; de Carvalho Queiroz, M.M.; Blomquist, G.J. Effect of age on cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in adult Chrysomya putoria (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Forensic Sci. Int. 2016, 259, e37–e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Jackson, L.L.; Armold, M.T.; Regnier, F.E. Cuticular lipids of adult fleshflies, Sarcophaga bullata. Insect Biochem. 1974, 4, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ferveur, J.-F.; Cobb, M. Behavioral and evolutionary roles of cuticular hydrocarbons in Diptera. In Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology; Blomquist, G.J., Bagnères, A.-G., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 325–343. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chung, H.; Carroll, S.B. Wax, sex and the origin of species: Dual roles of insect cuticular hydrocarbons in adaptation and mating. BioEssays 2015, 37, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ginzel, M.D.; Blomquist, G.J. Insect Hydrocarbons: Biochemistry and Chemical Ecology. In Extracellular Composite Matrices in Arthropods; Cohen, E., Moussian, B., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 221–252. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lockey, K.H. Insect cuticular hydrocarbons. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Comp. Biochem. 1980, 65, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Howard, R.W.; Blomquist, G.J. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2005, 50, 371–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Makki, R.; Cinnamon, E.; Gould, A.P. The development and functions of oenocytes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59, 405–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Uebel, E.G.; Sonnet, P.E.; Miller, R.W.; Beroza, M. Sex pheromone of the face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1975, 1, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Uebel, E.C.; Schwarz, M.; Miller, R.W.; Menzer, R.E. Mating stimulant pheromone and cuticular lipid constituents of Fannia pusio (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1978, 4, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Uebel, E.C.; Schwarz, M.; Miller, R.W.; Menzer, R.E. Mating stimulant pheromone and cuticular lipid constituents of Fannia femoralis (Stein) (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1978, 4, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Uebel, E.C.; Sonnet, P.E.; Menzer, R.E.; Miller, R.W.; Lusby, W.R. Mating-stimulant pheromone and cuticular lipid constituents of the little house fly, Fannia canicularis (L.). J. Chem. Ecol. 1977, 3, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jackson, L.L.; Bartelt, R.J. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila virilis: Comparison by age and sex. Insect Biochem. 1986, 16, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mpuru, S.; Blomquist, G.J.; Schal, C.; Roux, M.; Kuenzli, M.; Dusticier, G.; Clément, J.-L.; Bagnères, A.-G. Effect of age and sex on the production of internal and external hydrocarbons and pheromones in the housefly, Musca domestica. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2001, 31, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Trabalon, M.; Campan, M.; Clément, J.L.; Thon, B.; Lange, C.; Lefevre, J. Changes in cuticular hydrocarbon composition in relation to age and sexual behavior in the female Calliphora vomitoria (Diptera). Behav. Process. 1988, 17, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Trabalon, M.; Campan, M.; Clement, J.-L.; Lange, C.; Miquel, M.-T. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Calliphora vomitoria (Diptera): Relation to age and sex. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1992, 85, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pomonis, J.G. Cuticular hydrocarbons of the screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1989, 15, 2301–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Brown, W.V.; Morton, R.; Spradbery, J.P. Cuticular hydrocarbons of the old world screwworm fly, Chrysomya bezziana Villeneuve (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Chemical characterization and quantification by age and sex. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. 1992, 101, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Roux, O.; Gers, C.; Legal, L. Ontogenetic study of three Calliphoridae of forensic importance through cuticular hydrocarbon analysis. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2008, 22, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pechal, J.L.; Moore, H.; Drijfhout, F.; Benbow, M.E. Hydrocarbon profiles throughout adult Calliphoridae aging: A promising tool for forensic entomology. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014, 245, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bernhardt, V.; Pogoda, W.; Verhoff, M.A.; Toennes, S.W.; & Amendt, J. Estimating the age of the adult stages of the blow flies Lucilia sericata and Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) by means of the cuticular hydrocarbon n-pentacosane. Sci. Justice 2017, 57, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Toolson, E.C.; Markow, T.A.; Jackson, L.L.; Howard, R.W. Epicuticular hydrocarbon composition of wild and laboratory-reared Drosophila mojavensis Patterson and Crow (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1990, 83, 1165–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Noorman, N.; Den Otter, C.J. Effects of relative humidity, temperature, and population density on production of cuticular hydrocarbons in housefly Musca domestica L. J. Chem. Ecol. 2002, 28, 1819–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gerade, B.B.; Lee, S.H.; Scott, T.W.; Edman, J.D.; Harrington, L.C.; Kitthawee, S.; Clark, J.M. Field validation of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) age estimation by analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons. J. Med. Entomol. 2004, 41, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Johnson, J.-B.; Naiker, M. Seeing red: A review of the use of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in entomology. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2020, 55, 810–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lambert, B.; Sikulu-Lord, M.T.; Mayagaya, V.S.; Devine, G.; Dowell, F.; Churcher, T.S. Monitoring the age of mosquito populations using near-infrared spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Perez-Mendoza, J.; Dowell, F.E.; Broce, A.B.; Throne, J.E.; Wirtz, R.A.; Xie, F.; Fabrick, J.A.; Baker, J.E. Chronological age-grading of house lies by using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Med. Entomol. 2002, 39, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Mayagaya, V.S.; Michel, K.; Benedict, M.Q.; Killeen, G.F.; Wirtz, R.A.; Ferguson, H.M.; Dowell, F.E. Non-destructive determination of age and species of Anopheles gambiae s.l. using near-infrared spectroscopy. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 81, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sikulu, M.; Killeen, G.F.; Hugo, L.E.; Ryan, P.A.; Dowell, K.M.; Wirtz, R.A.; Moore, S.J.; Dowell, F.E. Near-infrared spectroscopy as a complementary age grading and species identification tool for African malaria vectors. Parasit. Vectors 2010, 3, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Liebman, K.; Swamidoss, I.; Vizcaino, L.; Lenhart, A.; Dowell, F.; Wirtz, R. The influence of diet on the use of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to determine the age of female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 92, 1070–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Villet, M.H.; Amendt, J. Advances in Entomological Methods for Death Time Estimation. Forensic Pathol. Rev. 2011, 6, 213–237. [Google Scholar]
  97. Voss, S.C.; Magni, P.; Dadour, I.; Nansen, C. Reflectance-based determination of age and species of blowfly puparia. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2017, 131, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Milali, M.P.; Sikulu-Lord, M.T.; Kiware, S.S.; Dowell, F.E.; Corliss, G.F.; Povinelli, R.J. Age grading An. gambiae and An. arabiensis using near infrared spectra and artificial neural networks. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Barbosa, T.M.; de Lima, L.A.; dos Santos, M.C.; Vasconcelos, S.D.; Gama, R.A.; Lima, K.M. A novel use of infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS and ATR-FTIR) coupled with variable selection algorithms for the identification of insect species (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) of medico-legal relevance. Acta Tropica 2018, 185, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Johnson, B.J.; Hugo, L.E.; Churcher, T.S.; Ong, O.T.W.; Devine, G.J. Mosquito age grading and vector-control programmes. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Khoshmanesh, A.; Christensen, D.; Perez-Guaita, D.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; O’Neill, S.L.; McNaughton, D.; Wood, B.R. Screening of Wolbachia endosymbiont infection in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes using attenuated total reflection midinfrared spectroscopy. Analyt. Chem. 2017, 89, 5285–5293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zehner, R.; Amendt, J.; Boehme, P. Gene expression analysis as a tool for age estimation of blowfly pupae. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2009, 2, 292–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zajac, B.K.; Amendt, J.; Horres, R.; Verhoff, M.A.; Zehner, R. De novo transcriptome analysis and highly sensitive digital gene expression profiling of Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) pupae using MACE (Massive Analysis of cDNA Ends). Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015, 15, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tarone, A.M.; Foran, D.R. Gene expression during blow fly development: Improving the precision of age estimates in forensic entomology. J. Forensic Sci. 2011, 56, S112–S122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tarone, A.M.; Jennings, K.C.; Foran, D.R. Aging blow fly eggs using gene expression: A feasibility Ssudy. J. Forensic Sci. 2007, 52, 1350–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zou, S.; Meadows, S.; Sharp, L.; Jan, L.Y.; Jan, Y.N. Genome-wide study of aging and oxidative stress response in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13726–13731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Arbeitman, M.N.; Furlong, E.E.M.; Imam, F.; Johnson, E.; Null, B.H.; Baker, B.S.; Krasnow, M.A.; Scott, M.P.; Davis, R.W.; White, K.P. Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2002, 297, 2270–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Pletcher, S.D.; Macdonald, S.J.; Marguerie, R.; Certa, U.; Stearns, S.C.; Goldstein, D.B.; Partridge, L. Genome-wide transcript profiles in aging and calorically restricted Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 712–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Kim, S.N.; Rhee, J.-H.; Song, Y.-H.; Park, D.Y.; Hwang, M.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.E.; Gim, B.S.; Yoon, J.H.; Kim, Y.-J.; et al. Age-dependent changes of gene expression in the Drosophila head. Neurobiol. Aging 2005, 26, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Cook, P.E.; Hugo, L.E.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Williams, C.R.; Chenoweth, S.F.; Ritchie, S.A.; Ryan, P.A.; Kay, B.H.; Blows, M.W.; O’Neill, S.L. The use of transcriptional profiles to predict adult mosquito age under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18060–18065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Cook, P.E.; Hugo, L.E.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Williams, C.R.; Chenoweth, S.F.; Ritchie, S.A.; Ryan, P.A.; Kay, B.H.; Blows, M.W.; O’Neill, S.L. Predicting the age of mosquitoes using transcriptional profiles. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2796–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Marinotti, O.; Calvo, E.; Nguyen, Q.K.; Dissanayake, S.; Ribeiro, J.M.C.; James, A.A. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in adult Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol. Biol. 2006, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Bednarova, A.; Hanna, M.E.; Rakshit, K.; O’Donnell, J.M.; Krishnan, N. Disruption of dopamine homeostasis has sexually dimorphic effects on senescence characteristics of Drosophila melanogaster. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2017, 45, 816–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. De Luca, M.; Roshina, N.V.; Geiger-Thornsberry, G.L.; Lyman, R.F.; Pasyukova, E.G.; Mackay, T.F.C. Dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) affects variation in Drosophila longevity. Nat. Genet. 2003, 34, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Carnes, M.U.; Campbell, T.; Huang, W.; Butler, D.G.; Carbone, M.A.; Duncan, L.H.; Harbajan, S.V.; King, E.M.; Peterson, K.R.; Weitzel, A.; et al. The genomic basis of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Martinson, E.O.; Peyton, J.; Kelkar, Y.D.; Jennings, E.C.; Benoit, J.B.; Werren, J.H.; Denlinger, D.L. Genome and ontogenetic-based transcriptomic analyses of the flesh fly, Sarcophaga bullata. G3 Genes Genom Gene 2019, 9, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Sze, S.H.; Dunham, J.P.; Carey, B.; Chang, P.L.; Li, F.; Edman, R.M.; Fjeldsted, C.; Scott, M.J.; Nuzhdin, S.V.; Tarone, A.M. A de novo transcriptome assembly of Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) with predicted alternative splices, single nucleotide polymorphisms and transcript expression estimates. Insect Mol. Biol. 2012, 21, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Wang, X.; Xiong, M.; Lei, C.; Zhu, F. The developmental transcriptome of the synanthropic fly Chrysomya megacephala and insights into olfactory proteins. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Anstead, C.A.; Korhonen, P.K.; Young, N.D.; Hall, R.S.; Jex, A.R.; Murali, S.C.; Hughes, D.S.; Lee, S.F.; Perry, T.; Stroehlein, A.J.; et al. Lucilia cuprina genome unlocks parasitic fly biology to underpin future interventions. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Anstead, C.A.; Batterham, P.; Korhonen, P.K.; Young, N.D.; Hall, R.S.; Bowles, V.M.; Richards, S.; Scott, M.J.; Gasser, R.B. A blow to the fly—Lucilia cuprina draft genome and transcriptome to support advances in biology and biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 605–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fleming, J.; Quattrocki, E.; Latter, G.; Miquel, J.; Marcuson, R.; Zuckerkandl, E.; Bensch, K. Age-dependent changes in proteins of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 1986, 231, 1157–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hugo, L.E.; Monkman, J.; Dave, K.A.; Wockner, L.F.; Birrell, G.W.; Norris, E.L.; Kienzle, V.J.; Sikulu, M.T.; Ryan, P.A.; Gorman, J.J.; et al. Proteomic biomarkers for ageing the mosquito Aedes aegypti to determine risk of pathogen transmission. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Iovinella, I.; Caputo, B.; Michelucci, E.; Dani, F.R.; della Torre, A. Candidate biomarkers for mosquito age-grading identified by label-free quantitative analysis of protein expression in Aedes albopictus females. J. Proteom. 2015, 128, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chang, C.L. Proteomics/qPCR protocol to estimate physical ages of wild male oriental fruit flies, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Sikulu, M.T.; Monkman, J.; Dave, K.A.; Hastie, M.L.; Dale, P.E.; Kitching, R.L.; Killeen, G.F.; Kay, B.H.; Gorman, J.J.; Hugo, L.E. Proteomic changes occurring in the malaria mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi during aging. J. Proteom. 2015, 126, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Rabani, V.; Cheatsazan, H.; Davani, S. Proteomics and lipidomics of black soldier fly (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) and blow fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larvae. J. Insect. Sci. 2019, 19, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Tomberlin, J.K.; Mohr, R.; Benbow, M.E.; Tarone, A.M.; VanLaerhoven, S. A Roadmap for Bridging Basic and Applied Research in Forensic Entomology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2011, 56, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Moon, R.D.; Krafsur, E.S. Pterin Quantity and Gonotrophic Stage as Indicators of Age in Musca autumnalis (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1995, 32, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Butler, S.M.; Moon, R.D.; Hinkle, N.C.; Millar, J.G.; McElfresh, J.S.; Mullens, B.A. Characterization of age and cuticular hydrocarbon variation in mating pairs of house fly, Musca domestica, collected in the field. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2009, 23, 426–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bernhardt, V.; Holdermann, T.; Scheid, N.; Schäfer, T.; Verhoff, M.A.; Amendt, J. Same, same but different!—Matching entomological traces to a human food source by stable isotope analysis. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018, 132, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An exemplary PMImin determination using a fictitious case. The dead body was discovered in an apartment (20 °C ambient temperature), and only larvae, pupae, and empty puparia of one single species, the blow fly Calliphora vicina, were found on the body and its surroundings. In order to determine the PMImin, the most advanced stage of its development will be of relevance. In the present case, these are empty puparia. Since there is no current method to narrow this down with respect to the time of hatching, the entomologist will assume that the flies hatched immediately before the body was found in order to determine a reliable PMImin. There is a risk that this may lead to an underestimation of the time period. According to, e.g., Marchenko [11], C. vicina needs about 21 days to complete a complete development cycle at a temperature of 20 °C. These 21 days would be the PMImin in the present case, based just on the immature specimens (larvae, pupae) and remains (empty puparia). However, there are hundreds of adult C. vicina in the apartment. Thirty to forty specimens are captured, and by using various techniques (see below), their age is estimated to be 15–17 days. Based on the assumption that the animals have developed on the cadaver, this now means that we are giving a PMImin of 36 days in the entomological report (21 days development of larva and pupa plus 15 days aging of the fly).
Figure 1. An exemplary PMImin determination using a fictitious case. The dead body was discovered in an apartment (20 °C ambient temperature), and only larvae, pupae, and empty puparia of one single species, the blow fly Calliphora vicina, were found on the body and its surroundings. In order to determine the PMImin, the most advanced stage of its development will be of relevance. In the present case, these are empty puparia. Since there is no current method to narrow this down with respect to the time of hatching, the entomologist will assume that the flies hatched immediately before the body was found in order to determine a reliable PMImin. There is a risk that this may lead to an underestimation of the time period. According to, e.g., Marchenko [11], C. vicina needs about 21 days to complete a complete development cycle at a temperature of 20 °C. These 21 days would be the PMImin in the present case, based just on the immature specimens (larvae, pupae) and remains (empty puparia). However, there are hundreds of adult C. vicina in the apartment. Thirty to forty specimens are captured, and by using various techniques (see below), their age is estimated to be 15–17 days. Based on the assumption that the animals have developed on the cadaver, this now means that we are giving a PMImin of 36 days in the entomological report (21 days development of larva and pupa plus 15 days aging of the fly).
Diagnostics 11 00152 g001
Figure 2. Different methods can use/analyse one and the same adult specimen by different techniques.
Figure 2. Different methods can use/analyse one and the same adult specimen by different techniques.
Diagnostics 11 00152 g002
Table 1. Summary of existing methods [in brackets key references] and an assessment of their current value/benefit with a scale from 1: bad to 5: excellent.
Table 1. Summary of existing methods [in brackets key references] and an assessment of their current value/benefit with a scale from 1: bad to 5: excellent.
TechniqueProContraValue
Reproductive system
[25,27,31]
easy to do preparationmainly just for females rough classification into categories3
MorphologyCuticle growth layers
[36,38,39]
easy to do preparation, day-precise informationIdentification and categorisation of different cuticles not a simple routine task2
Wing fray
[9,43,46]
easy to classifynot solely linked to the age of the fly but to its life history rough classification into categories 1
BiochemistryPteridines
[59,61,62]
easy to do extraction many different pteridines = targets some analytical techniques are low costSpecies and sex specificity makes it necessary to produce separate references for each taxa4
Cuticular hydrocarbons
[72,84,92]
easy to do extractionSophisticated analysis and evaluation
Species and sex specificity makes it necessary to produce separate references for each taxa
4
Genetics & proteomicsGenes
[111,112,116]
Easy to do extraction and applying a simple method (RT-qPCR)requires extensive target identification and optimization, i.e., expensive laboratory work
Species and sex specificity makes it necessary to produce separate references for each taxa
2
Proteins
[111,112,116]
easy to do extractionNo data at all for species of forensic relevance expensive laboratory work1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amendt, J.; Bugelli, V.; Bernhardt, V. Time Flies—Age Grading of Adult Flies for the Estimation of the Post-Mortem Interval. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020152

AMA Style

Amendt J, Bugelli V, Bernhardt V. Time Flies—Age Grading of Adult Flies for the Estimation of the Post-Mortem Interval. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(2):152. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amendt, Jens, Valentina Bugelli, and Victoria Bernhardt. 2021. "Time Flies—Age Grading of Adult Flies for the Estimation of the Post-Mortem Interval" Diagnostics 11, no. 2: 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020152

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop