Next Article in Journal
In Vivo Microbeam Radiation Therapy at a Conventional Small Animal Irradiator
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeting TRPV1 for Cancer Pain Relief: Can It Work?
Previous Article in Journal
Gender-Specific Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer: BRCA Genes and Beyond
Previous Article in Special Issue
Methylene Blue for the Treatment of Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis during Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: An Uncontrolled Cohort
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 16
Issue 3
10.3390/cancers16030580
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Ion Channels Involvement in Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Preclinical Studies

by
Gabriela Becker
,
Samuel Felipe Atuati
and
Sara Marchesan Oliveira
*,†
Laboratory of Neurotoxicity and Psychopharmacology—Pain Research Group, Graduate Program in Biological Sciences: Toxicological Biochemistry, Centre of Natural and Exact Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Camobi, Santa Maria 97105-900, RS, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Camobi, Santa Maria 97105-900, RS, Brazil.
Cancers 2024, 16(3), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030580
Submission received: 20 December 2023 / Revised: 23 January 2024 / Accepted: 27 January 2024 / Published: 30 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Pain: From Basic Research to Drug Discovery and Clinical Studies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cisplatin is a chemotherapy drug extensively used to treat cancer, improving the survival of cancer patients. Although effective for this purpose, its use is accompanied by notorious severe adverse effects that significantly reduce patient’s quality of life. This review will discuss the main impact of chemotherapy on the peripheral nervous system, a clinical condition known as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, with emphasis on cisplatin. Furthermore, the review encompasses an analysis of the role played by G protein-coupled receptors and ion channels in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, extracting insights from preclinical experimental studies.

Abstract

Cisplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapy drug widely used to treat various solid tumours. Although it is effective in anti-cancer therapy, many patients develop peripheral neuropathy during and after cisplatin treatment. Peripheral neuropathy results from lesions or diseases in the peripheral somatosensory nervous system and is a significant cause of debilitation and suffering in patients. In recent years, preclinical studies have been conducted to elucidate the mechanisms involved in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain, as well as to promote new therapeutic targets since current treatments are ineffective and are associated with adverse effects. G-protein coupled receptors and ion channels play a significant role in pain processing and may represent promising targets for improving the management of cisplatin-induced neuropathic pain. This review describes the role of G protein-coupled receptors and ion channels in cisplatin-induced pain, analysing preclinical experimental studies that investigated the role of each receptor subtype in the modulation of cisplatin-induced pain.

1. Introduction

Neuropathic pain is a maladaptive condition resulting from a lesion or disease in the somatosensory nervous system [1,2]. Despite the estimate that neuropathic pain may affect 7 to 10% of the world’s population, data can be misleading due to the difficulty in defining a precise diagnosis and a broad epidemiological survey. The trend is a considerable increase due to higher rates of population ageing, diabetes, and cancer [3,4]. Neuropathic pain may be manifested as acute pain and be partially reversible, although the chronic pain state is more common [5]. Patients manifest ongoing and spontaneous pain-related symptoms, beginning as paraesthesia and dysesthesia, progressing to burning, numbness, pricking and tingling sensations, and electric shock-like pain, which may be accompanied by evoked pain such as sensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimulus [1,4,5].
Neuropathic pain can result from damage to the central or peripheral nervous system. Central neuropathic pain results from lesions in the spinal cord, stroke, and multiple sclerosis. Peripheral neuropathic pain may be caused by amputation (e.g., phantom limb pain), direct nerve damage, nerve compression, herpes zoster, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), antiretrovirals, cancer, and chemotherapy agents [2,5]. However, some types of aetiology are challenging to define because they are related to mutual causes, such as neuropathic pain provoked by cancer and chemotherapy that simultaneously affect patients [6].
Cancer patients undergoing oncological treatment often experience pain resulting from the chemotherapy or the tumour itself. Neuropathic pain is one of the mechanisms that characterise chronic cancer pain, affecting 20% of cancer patients [7]. Similarly, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a clinical condition of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain, is a prevalent phenomenon attributed to antineoplastic drugs, including platinum analogues and taxanes, affecting close to 90% of patients [8,9]. Denoted by its debilitating aspects, chronic pain negatively impacts individuals’ quality of life, inducing, besides painful symptoms, sleep and mood disturbances [6,9,10].
Due to the complexity of neuropathic pain in cancer patients, the clinical management of pain treatments is complex [6]. Another challenge in this context is that treatments for this purpose have low efficacy, as they provide only symptomatic resolution and cause multiple adverse effects [3,11]. Thus, understanding and elucidating the neurotoxic mechanisms involved in neuropathic pain may contribute to the study and application of new therapeutic interventions.

2. Cancer

Cancer is a highly debilitating condition and one of the major causes of death worldwide [12]. Remarkably, cancer represents a significant public health problem [12,13]. In 2020, around 19.3 million new cases and approximately 10 million deaths from cancer were recorded worldwide [12]. Among the various types, lung and breast cancers are the most prevalent and deadly [14,15,16]. Overall, cancer incidence continues to grow, and projections indicate a 47% increase in cases by the 2040s compared to 2020, representing around 28 million individuals affected [12]. The growth and ageing of the population are factors that reflect the increase in cancer cases [14,17].
Despite the high number of new cancer cases, patient survival has increased dramatically in recent years. This reflects the improvements in detection methods, allowing early diagnosis of many cases and, fundamentally, more effective and targeted oncologic treatments [17,18,19]. Nevertheless, the favourable statistics related to cancer survival are accompanied by physical and psychosocial adverse effects due to the cancer itself or its treatments [20]. Notably, pain is one of these events that affect cancer patients, which, along with other factors, contributes to reducing the quality of life and life expectancy of cancer patients and survivors [6,7,21].
The pain associated with cancer, in many patients, is the first sign of cancer and occurs at any time during the disease. Recent estimates indicate that an overall rate of 44.5% of cancer patients experience pain throughout all phases of the disease, while the prevalence is close to 55% at advanced stages [22]. Specifically, 40% of oncologic patients undergoing treatment report experiencing pain during and up to three months after treatment [23].
Cancer-related pain can result from the tumour itself (primary cancer or metastases), as a result of diagnostic (biopsies and resection) or therapeutic procedures (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), and due to a combination of these factors [6,19]. Nevertheless, the emergence of neurotoxicity, manifested mainly as CIPN, represents a significant adverse effect associated with the extensive use of chemotherapy drugs to treat the most prevalent tumours [19,24].

3. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)

CIPN is a dose-limiting adverse effect of several commonly used chemotherapy drugs. The primary pharmacological classes related to the development of CIPN include the platinum-based antineoplastics drugs (mainly oxaliplatin and cisplatin), taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), vinca alkaloids (vincristine and vinblastine), the proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib), and immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide) [10,25,26].
Cisplatin, the pioneering platinum-derived compound, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1978 for treating various solid tumours, employed independently or combined with other chemotherapeutic agents or radiotherapy [27,28]. Despite numerous advancements, cisplatin continues to be one of the most widely prescribed chemotherapy drugs, used in the treatment of a wide range of paediatric and adult malignancies such as ovarian, testis, lung, bladder, head and neck, advanced cervical cancer, lymphomas, and metastatic osteosarcomas, among others [27,29,30]. The antitumour action of cisplatin initially requires its intracellular bioactivation, where a highly reactive molecule binds to DNA via intra- and interstrand crosslinks and forms DNA-platinum adducts. The DNA-platinum adducts interfere with the proliferation of tumour cells by restricting DNA replication and transcription mechanisms, interrupting DNA synthesis and acting on signal transduction pathways, which results in programmed cell death [28,31,32].
Despite its effectiveness against various solid tumours, the non-specific nature of cisplatin and most chemotherapy drugs compromises the integrity of normal cells, resulting in the undesirable adverse effects commonly observed in cancer treatment [33]. In summary, chemotherapy drugs act in rapidly dividing cells and may affect healthy cells presenting this division profile, such as bone marrow cells or gastrointestinal mucosa. Intriguingly, this characteristic contrasts with neurons that are substantially affected by chemotherapy drugs, like cisplatin, leading to neurotoxicity and deleterious effects on the nervous system [20,34]. Chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity occurs at the level of the central nervous system (known as “chemobrain”), enteric nervous system (referred to as enteric neuropathy), and peripheral nervous system (referred to as peripheral neuropathy) [34,35]. Herein, we will focus on the effects on the peripheral nervous system.
Peripheral sensory neurons are more susceptible to the toxic action of chemotherapy drugs, as in contrast to the central nervous system, the peripheral nervous system lacks a protective structure like the blood–brain barrier, allowing the diffusion of systemically administered drugs to the peripheral neurons [27,33,34,35]. Chemotherapy drugs affect the peripheral nervous system in different structures, including the axon, where the damage or loss results in axonopathy, or dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons, leading to neuronopathy/ganglionopathy [35,36].
DRG sensory neurons are the primary target of peripheral neurotoxicity resulting from platinum-based chemotherapy [31,36]. DRGs are vascularized by fenestrated capillaries, making them more permeable to circulating compounds and the main site of cisplatin accumulation [36]. In addition to the absence of the blood–brain barrier, two other reasons contribute to the increase in the amount of cisplatin in the DRG: increased absorption of platinum-compounds in the DRG and a decrease in the ability to metabolize cisplatin within the cells.
The increase in cisplatin absorption in the DRG occurs due to the expression of specific membrane transporters, called organic cation transporters (OCTs), which increase the transport of platinum compounds to cells. The second hypothesis suggests a decline in glutathione levels in DRG. Glutathione is a protein capable of binding and deactivating cisplatin, forming a complex that is subsequently eliminated from the cell [27,36,37].
In DRG, neurotoxicity cisplatin is associated with mitochondrial and nuclear DNA damage via forming nuclear and mitochondrial DNA-platin complexes (Figure 1). This process involves mitochondrial dysfunction, causing disturbances in protein synthesis and mitochondrial respiratory chain reactions, which lead to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induce cellular oxidative stress, contributing as a component of neuronal apoptosis [27,31,38,39] (Figure 1). Therefore, DRG apoptosis is proposed as a primary mechanism of neurotoxicity induced by cisplatin, characterizing sensory neuronopathy [36,39]. However, the neurotoxicity may result in secondary axonal damage and chronic sensory neuropathy [36,40]. These neurotoxic effects can occur directly through interactions of chemotherapy drugs with all neuron structures or indirect mechanisms, such as inflammation and glial damage development [34]. Interestingly, postmortem tissue of cisplatin-treated patients demonstrated a reduced volume of DRG soma, evidence of necrosis, and large fibre axonal loss [41].
Clinically, the sensory symptoms of CIPN are predominant in patients and can persist for months to years after the completion of chemotherapy [38,42,43]. Generally, CIPN symptoms are more prominent in the distal extremities, such as the feet and hands, known as the “glove and stocking” distribution. However, prolonged treatment may worsen signs and symptoms and progress to more proximal areas of the limbs [10,27,42,44]. Patients manifest symptoms such as numbness and tingling (paraesthesia, an abnormal sensation that is not painful or unpleasant), which may occur spontaneously or when evoked by a stimulus. Additionally, characteristic symptoms of neuropathic pain are frequently reported, such as sensations like burning, tingling, freezing, and electric shock-like pain, as well as allodynia (pain to a stimulus that generally does not produce pain) or hyperalgesia (increased pain from a stimulus that usually induces pain) provoked by mechanical or thermal stimuli [10,39,42,44,45]. While sensory nerve dysfunction is prominent, in severe cases, the damage may extend to autonomic and motor nerves, thus inducing motor and autonomic signs and symptoms [27,29,42]. Consequently, this condition may require subtherapeutic dosing, dose interruptions or treatment discontinuation before completing the chemotherapeutic regimen. Understandably, this has implications for the effectiveness of oncological treatment and overall patient survival [42,46,47].
Although each chemotherapy drug has particularities in the development of CIPN, the predominant feature and risk factor among most classes is the dose-dependent nature of this condition. Specifically, the incidence of cisplatin-induced neuropathy highly depends on the cumulative dose, with mild to severe peripheral neurotoxicity being observed in adult patients after a cumulative dose of 300–350 mg/m2 [27,29,39]. Higher cumulative doses of cisplatin and longer exposure times increase the severity of CIPN, as well as the possibility of developing chronic neuropathy [10,39]. Furthermore, signs and symptoms may develop or worsen after treatment has stopped, a phenomenon known as “coasting” [29,39]. In particular, about 30–50% of individuals who completee the treatment course with cisplatin experience peripheral neuropathy, with 10% of them presenting disabling symptoms [37]. In addition to the dose of chemotherapy, the incidence of CIPN can be influenced by several other factors, such as pre-existing conditions, including diabetes, previous peripheral nerve damage, patient age, and the combination of neurotoxic chemotherapy agents, such as the combined therapy of cisplatin and paclitaxel [48].
Therefore, CIPN is one of the clinical complications of antitumour chemotherapy that seriously affects daily activities and impacts the overall quality of life of cancer patients and survivors [25,27,34]. Despite the severe and long-lasting symptoms associated with CIPN, there are currently no efficacious pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions or preventive strategies to mitigate the development of peripheral neuropathy [43]. Even after more than two decades of research and several clinical trials, the only medication the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends to treat CIPN is duloxetine, a serotonin-noradrenaline uptake inhibitor [43,47].
In recent years, a substantial portion of research has been dedicated to unravelling the mechanisms of CIPN and has primarily concentrated on the peripheral nervous system. These studies use experimental animals (rats or mice) submitted to chemotherapy over an extended period (days or weeks) to simulate the treatment process observed in humans. This approach is complemented by evaluations of clinical indicators of CIPN, including allodynia and hyperalgesia, and the assessment of possible mechanisms related to the development of CIPN. In this sense, numerous mechanisms are implicated in CIPN, such as changes in cell-signalling pathways such as G-coupled protein receptors (GPCRs), altered expression of ion channels, inflammatory response, and mitochondrial dysfunction.
Therefore, an updated literature review of the essential mechanisms underlying cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy is needed. This may be crucial for identifying new pharmacological approaches to help advance the management of CIPN symptoms without affecting the oncological treatment regimen. This review, therefore, concentrates on the role of GPCRs and ion channels in animal models of cisplatin-induced neuropathy. For this purpose, the review was carried out in the PubMed database. The search was performed in the PubMed database for indexed articles published in English by crossing the keyword cisplatin: “Cisplatin AND pain AND G protein-coupled receptors” and “Cisplatin AND pain AND ion channels”. The manuscripts were selected based on a careful review of the abstracts, centred only on studies using cisplatin as a single agent. Studies addressing other chemotherapies were not included unless the results were specifically related to cisplatin.

4. Role of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

GPCRs are involved in most physiological and pathophysiological processes, including pain. Substantially, GPCRs are widely expressed by sensory neurons, detecting both excitatory and inhibitory stimuli exerting actions on pain transmission [49,50].
GPCRs constitute the largest, most dynamic and characterized family of receptors, with approximately 850 members [51,52]. GPCRs are formed by seven transmembrane domains, an extracellular amino terminus, and an intracellular carboxyl terminus and can be activated by several ligands. To initiate signalling, GPCRs couple with intracellular transducers such as heterotrimeric G proteins, comprising Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, and activating several downstream effector molecules. Gα subunits are classified into four subfamilies, Gαs, Gαi, Gαq, and Gα12/13, and each of these families activates unique signalling pathways. The stimulation of receptors coupled to Gαs activates adenylyl cyclase, stimulating their catalytic activity and thus cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production and subsequent activation of cAMP-regulated kinase proteins such as protein kinase A (PKA) that sustains intracellular signals. Differently, the activation of Gαi proteins inhibit several adenylyl cyclase isoforms, reducing the intracellular cAMP levels. Members of the Gαq family interact with and activate the phospholipase C (PLC) pathway, with consequent formation of inositol 1,4,5- triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 stimulates the release of calcium (Ca2+) from intracellular stores, which, together with DAG, activates protein kinase C (PKC). The Gα12/13 family interact with members of the RH domain containing guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the Rho (RhoGEFs) family of proteins, leading to the subsequent activation of the Rho family of small GTPases [51,52].
GPCRs and cascades downstream of their activation are implicated in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Members of the GPCRs family, such as kinins receptors, are expressed in important structures for pain modulation in the peripheral and central nervous system [53]. In this sense, recent studies using pharmacological antagonism and genetic manipulation have demonstrated the contribution of kinin B1 and B2 receptors to the painful behaviours of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy [54]. Furthermore, it was observed that PLC and protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε) intracellular signalling pathways downstream from the kinin B2 receptor activation are involved in the transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) channel sensitization, contributing to the painful behaviours caused by cisplatin in mice [55]. Thus, kinin receptor antagonists present themselves as promising pharmacological strategies for treating cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (Figure 2).
Adenosine is a purine nucleoside that signals via four different GPCRs (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) in various tissues, especially in the DRGs, spinal cord, supraspinal structures, and immune cells [56,57]. They are, therefore, critical in physiological and pathophysiological states, including pain. In this sense, the modulation of adenosine receptors is essential for acute and chronic pain models [58]. Recently, Dewaeles et al., 2022, observed that the FDA-approved adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, istradefylline (KW6002), attenuated cisplatin-induced painful hypersensitivity by reducing the expression of cytokines related to CIPN in DRGs. Favourably, KW6002 presented nephroprotective effects and did not alter the antitumour properties of cisplatin in tumour-bearing mice and could even enhance them. Given the safety of KW6002, the clinical translation would benefit cancer survivors and cancer patients undergoing cisplatin treatment [59]. In addition to the adenosine A2A receptor, a study highlighted the role of the adenosine A3 receptor in regulating pain induced by cisplatin. Adenosine A3 receptor selective agonist, MRS5890, prevented signs of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, such as mechanical allodynia, spontaneous pain, and sensorimotor deficits, highlighting the efficacy of adenosine A3 receptor agonist in neuropathic pain induced by cisplatin [60] (Figure 2).
The endocannabinoid system is another system implicated in painful conditions that have received substantial attention in research. The modulation of this system has demonstrated promising outcomes in attenuating pain, such as CIPN, in several clinical and preclinical studies [61]. The endocannabinoid system is an essential physiological system, which encompasses its two receptors, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2), endogenous cannabinoid ligands, mainly anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG), and metabolic enzymes responsible for metabolizing, such as fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL). Both cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, belong to the GPCRs family and exert their actions primarily through the Gi protein. Regarding the expression of receptors, CB1 receptors are predominantly expressed throughout the central nervous system, while CB2 receptors are found primarily in immune cells and peripheral tissues [61,62]. In this sense, studies have demonstrated the importance of this system for pain in CIPN and specifically for pain caused by cisplatin (Figure 2).
Compounds targeting the endocannabinoid system have attenuated cisplatin-induced pain behaviours in rodents. Specifically, a selective agonist of CB1 receptors, ACEA, locally or systemically administered, decreased mechanical allodynia in cisplatin-treated rats [63]. Given the limitations of CB1 agonists related to psychoactive effects, a recently developed synthetic peripherally restricted cannabinoid, 4-{2-[-(1E)-1[(4-propylnaphthalen-1-yl)methylidene]-1H-inden-3-yl]ethyl}morpholine (PrNMI), has shown effectiveness in alleviating cisplatin-induced mechanical and cold allodynia without significant psychoactive adverse effects or tolerance to repetitive administration [64]. Furthermore, a CB1 receptor-positive allosteric modulator (GAT229) was also tested in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. GAT229 mitigated and slowed the progression of cisplatin-induced mechanical allodynia and heat thermal hyperalgesia without eliciting the typical manifestations associated with CB1 receptor activation, such as psychoactive effects, tolerance, and dependence [65]. Similarly, CB2 receptor agonists, such as AM1710 and JWH-133, have also been shown to suppress mechanical and cold allodynia in the cisplatin-induced neuropathic pain model [63,66].
Non-selective CB1/CB2 receptor agonists WIN55,212–2, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and CP55,940 also alleviated the signs of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy [63,67,68,69]. Interestingly, these studies also show that tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of cannabinoid agonists can develop through desensitization of the CB1 following prolonged administration. Desensitization results from the phosphorylation of serine residues of the CB1 receptor by a G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) and the subsequent receptor association with β-arrestin. Thus, mutation of these phosphorylation sites of CB1 leads to decreased desensitization and a prolonged antinociceptive effect of WIN55,212–2 in mice with cisplatin-induced chronic neuropathy. In contrast, this mutation did not delay the tolerance to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and CP55,940 effects in cisplatin-induced neuropathy [63,67,68,69].
In addition to cannabinoid receptors, studies have demonstrated the importance of endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG and the enzymes controlling degradation in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. The intraplantar administration of endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG attenuated the cisplatin-established mechanical hyperalgesia in mice, acting through a CB1-dependent mechanism but not CB2 receptors [70,71]. Enzymes metabolize these endocannabinoids; FAAH hydrolyzes AEA, and MGL primarily hydrolyzes 2 AG. Consequently, the use of peripherally restricted (URB937) and centrally active (URB597) FAAH inhibitors reduced cisplatin-evoked behavioural hypersensitivities [70,72,73,74]. Likewise, MGL inhibitors, such as JZL184, also reduced the mechanical and cold allodynia induced by cisplatin [71,72]. Therefore, inhibitors of metabolizing enzymes present an effective pharmacological strategy for alleviating cisplatin-induced pain symptoms.
Repeated treatment with cisplatin causes changes in multiple endocannabinoid signalling elements in tissues related to transduction and transmission of nociception. Levels of CB2 mRNA were reduced in the DRG of rats administered cisplatin [64]. Correspondingly, CB2 protein expression was reduced by more than 75% in cisplatin-treated mice’s plantar paw skin and spinal cord [71]. In contrast, the expression of CB1 receptors was unaffected by mice cisplatin exposure [64,71]. Furthermore, treatment with cisplatin alters endocannabinoid tone; specifically, it was observed that cisplatin decreases 2-AG and AEA content in the DRG and plantar paw skin [70,71,72]. Conversely, it increases levels of both 2-AG and AEA in the lumbar spinal cord, potentially reflecting an adaptive central response to peripheral injury induced by chemotherapy [71,72]. Taken together, these data demonstrate the importance of the endocannabinoid system for peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin, showing how this system can be altered by cisplatin treatment, as well as being an alternative for the treatment of cisplatin-caused painful conditions. Table 1 provides an overview of the studies mentioned here.

5. Role of Ion Channels in Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Nociceptive neurons, responsible for detecting painful signals, express a wide array of ion channels, such as sodium, potassium, and calcium ion channels. Collectively, these channels regulate nociceptor excitability and function as pain transducers. In summary, voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels are crucial in generating action potentials, while voltage-gated calcium channels are essential for neurotransmitter release from central or peripheral nociceptor terminals [75,76].
In this sense, most of the time, the development of peripheral neuropathy associated with the use of chemotherapy drugs is related to changes in the activation potential of peripheral nerves, which may be linked to changes in the expression and function of ion channels, such as voltage-gated calcium channels, voltage-gated potassium channels, and transient receptor potential family (TRP) channels (Figure 3).
TRPs are channels widely expressed in sensory neurons and act as transducers for thermal, chemical, and mechanical stimuli, implicated in different painful conditions, including peripheral neuropathy induced by chemotherapy drugs [77]. In this sense, Ta et al. (2009) showed the first evidence regarding the contribution of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channel as an essential mediator for thermal hyperalgesia in cisplatin-induced neuropathy, in which cisplatin treated-TRPV1 knockout mice did not develop thermal hyperalgesia [78]. A recent study found similar results for the heat-evoked response in TRPV1 knockout mice, in which the development of thermal hyperalgesia induced by cisplatin was controlled for up to 2 weeks [79]. Beyond TRPV1, the TRPA1 channel contributes significantly to cisplatin-induced mechanical allodynia since TRPA1 null mice do not reduce mechanical threshold after cisplatin treatment [80].
In addition to genetic approaches, pharmacological tools suggest the involvement of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in cisplatin-induced pain behaviours. For example, the pharmacological inhibition of the TRPA1 channel (using the A967079 antagonist) reduced the mechanical and cold allodynia induced by cisplatin in mice, while a TRPA1 agonist (allyl isothiocyanate) at a subnociceptive dose enhanced these behaviours [55]. Furthermore, cisplatin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity was inhibited by silencing TRPA1 and TRPV1 through the intraplantar administration of a membrane-impermeable lidocaine analogue (QX-314) together with TRPV1 agonist (capsaicin) or with TRPA1 agonist, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) [81].
In line with this finding, an up-regulation of TRPA1, TRPV1, and transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) mRNA was observed in DRG neurons cultured and treated with cisplatin [82]. A similar increase in TRPV1 and TRPA1 mRNA in DRG neurons occurred following in vivo treatment with cisplatin [82]. In agreement, Khasabova [70] observed increased TRPV1 expression after immunofluorescence in cisplatin-treated mice’s DRG neurons. This increase in the expression of TRP channels after cisplatin treatment may be correlated with cisplatin-induced mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity. On the other hand, there was no change in the proportion of TRPV1-immunopositive trigeminal ganglia neurons in cisplatin-treated mice [82]. Another study also did not identify changes in the TRPV1-positive cells in all DRG neurons or muscle-afferent neurons after cisplatin administration [83].Furthermore, this study showed no alteration in noxious thermal sensitivity, although TRPV2-positive cells significantly increased in cisplatin-treated rats [83].
Interestingly, the cytosolic calcium concentration increased in DRG neurons positive for TRPV1 and TRPA1 channels exposed to cisplatin, while the mitochondrial calcium concentration decreased, indicating a calcium release from mitochondria to the cytosol [84]. Besides regulating TRP channels, cisplatin also modulates voltage-gated calcium channels. This modulation changes the intracellular calcium homeostasis, a process critical for the induction of neurotoxicity.
The calcium channel family consists of several channel subtypes that can be divided broadly into two groups based on their voltage dependence of activation: low voltage-activated and high voltage-activated channels. The high voltage-activated calcium channels are heteromultimeric protein complexes comprised of a pore-forming α1 subunit and the auxiliary subunits, β, γ, and α2δ. The high voltage-activated calcium channels are further classified as voltage-gated calcium (CaV) of L-type (CaV1.2, CaV1.3, CaV1.4), P/Q-type (CaV2.1), N-type (CaV2.2), and R-type (CaV2.3). Three types of CaV3 channels are low voltage-activated (CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and CaV3.3), all of which represent T-type calcium channels [85]. Nociceptors also express different subtypes of potassium (K+) channels, which constitute the most diverse ion channel family, distinguished by their activation mechanisms and structures. They include several types of voltage-gated K+ channel (KV), calcium-activated K+ channel (KCa), sodium-activated K+ channel (KNa), two-pore domain K+ channel(K2P), and inwardly rectifying K+ channel (Kir) [76].
The first evidence showed that small DRG neurons exposed to cisplatin reduced the peak and sustained Ca2+ currents. These reductions in Ca2+ currents were through non-specific calcium channels; however, differential modulation of voltage-gated calcium channel current subtypes has been suggested [86]. In this sense, analogous research showed the essential role of N-type CaV channels in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy for the first time. Firstly, this study identified a concentration-dependent effect of cisplatin on CaV channel currents, where acute exposure reduced CaV channel currents, while long-term exposure of DRG neurons to cisplatin increased CaV current densities, suggesting that acute and long-term effects of cisplatin may be mediated by specific subtypes of CaV channels [87]. Thus, specific measurements of Cav channel currents showed that the currents of P/Q- (CaV2.1), L- (CaV1.1–CaV1.4), and T (CaV3.1–CaV3.3)-type CaV channels were reduced, and those of N-type (CaV2.2) CaV channels were increased under cisplatin treatment, endorsing the idea that the N-type CaV channel may be related to increased intracellular calcium during cisplatin treatment [87]. Interestingly, there are differences in how N-type currents were upregulated. Short-term cisplatin exposure increased N-type CaV currents via PKC activation. In contrast, the calcium/calmodulin kinase II activation mediated the N-type CaV current density increases after long-term cisplatin exposure [87]. Therefore, channel regulation can occur through a short-term mechanism via the phosphorylation of the ion channel by PKC. Conversely, long-term regulation may be overexpression of the N-type CaV channel mediated by calcium/calmodulin kinase II.
Beyond the functional modulation, cisplatin increased the N-type CaV channel protein expression in vitro and in vivo without influencing the mRNA level in DRG neurons. Similarly, repetitive in vivo cisplatin administration (three injections) increased N-type protein expression for at least 14 days after the last cisplatin administration [88]. Since CaV channels are essential for calcium influx into neuronal cells and the upregulation of these channels may contribute to a critical increase of intracellular calcium, this observed protein overexpression may be responsible for increasing N-type CaV channel current density [87,88]. Moreover, auxiliary subunits important for CaV channel function and expression, specifically α1β and α2δ1 subunits of the N-type CaV channel, were also increased in DRG after cisplatin exposure [87]. In accordance with this data, gabapentin and pregabalin, drugs that bind and inhibit the α2δ1 subunit of CaV channels, have been shown to diminish neuropathic-like pain associated with cisplatin [89,90,91,92,93]. These data reinforce that the CaV channels contribute to cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, especially the CaV1 and CaV2 channel subtypes.
Further evidence supports the role of N-type CaV channels in symptoms of cisplatin-related neuropathic pain. Using an N-type CaV blocker, ω-conotoxin MVIIA, administered intravenously, prevented typical signs of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy as heat hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia [87,88]. Notably, ω-conotoxin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for human use and is clinically available as ziconotide (Prialt®), administered via intrathecal infusion to treat severe chronic pain [94]. Furthermore, ω-conotoxin MVIIA prevented the cisplatin-mediated increase in N-type protein expression without a present effect on N-type channel expression and behavioural characteristics when ω-conotoxin MVIIA was administrated alone [87]. Therefore, the N-type CaV2.2 channel blockade presents direct neuroprotective effects over the behavioural characteristics and N-type channel expression induced by cisplatin, thus representing a new neuroprotective strategy against the neurotoxic actions of cisplatin. Despite the well-established efficacy of ω-conotoxin MVIIA administered via the intrathecal route in the cisplatin-induced neuropathy model, recent observations indicate that subcutaneous administration (intraplantar) of three distinct ω-conotoxins—MVIIA, GVIA, and CVIF—failed to reduce mechanical allodynia in a model of acute peripheral neuropathy induced by intraplantar cisplatin administration in mice [95].
In addition to voltage-gated calcium channels, evidence supports a possible role of voltage-gated potassium channels in chemotherapy drugs-evoked neuronal hyperexcitability. In this sense, it was observed that a Kv7 channel activator, retigabine, partially prevented the membrane depolarization and peripheral axon loss in cisplatin-treated mice. Thus, it is assumed that the retigabine effect in causing an increase in K+ currents produce a hyperpolarizing shift in membrane potential, which may partially contribute to the reduction of cisplatin-induced neuropathic pain [96].
Recently, a reduction of Kir4.1 expression and current density was shown in cultured satellite glial cells exposed to cisplatin. Since Kir4.1 is an essential protein in regulating neuronal activity, the reduced Kir4.1 expression and its functional modulation after cisplatin exposure suggest a critical role for this channel in peripheral neuropathy [97]. Furthermore, cisplatin reduced the current density in K2P18.1- and Kv1.4-transfected HEK 293 cells. Thus, K2P18.1, a two-pore K+ channel, is another K+ channel through which cisplatin may confer neuronal hyperexcitability [98]. Therefore, the regulation of these channels could be a promising alternative to reduce cisplatin-induced neuropathic pain.
The participation of acid-sensitive ion channels (ASICs), particularly ASIC3, has been noted in the model of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Hori et al. showed that ASIC3 plays an essential role in mediating mechanonociception. Cisplatin administration increased ASIC3 expression in small and medium-sized cells of all DRG neurons, as well as in a group of medium-sized cells of L5 DRG neurons innervating the gastrocnemius muscle. Furthermore, using an ASIC antagonist, amiloride, suppressed cutaneous and muscular hyperalgesia induced by cisplatin administration [83]. Hence, this study demonstrates the implication of ASIC3 in developing cisplatin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity. Table 2 provides an overview of the studies mentioned here.
In summary, the employment of animal models for peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin has revealed that cisplatin treatment can influence the function and change the expression of various ion channels. Among these are TRP channels, voltage-gated calcium and potassium channels, and ASICs, which are implicated in structures crucial for nociceptive processing. Therefore, numerous studies have demonstrated the impact of various molecules, whether derived from natural sources or not, with activity on these channels in the search for novel therapeutic interventions for treating cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, particularly pain. In this context, as previously described, the investigations involving ω-conotoxins are an example. Another example is the natural compound Berberine, which prevented and reduced painful behaviours induced by the peripheral neuropathy model with cisplatin. The observed effects of berberine are suggested to be linked to indirect effects on TRPV1 activity [79]. Similarly, the flavonoid 6-Methoxyflavanon has been shown to mitigate cisplatin-induced nociceptive behaviours. These effects are related to the influence of 6-Methoxyflavanon on GABAergic receptors [99,100].

6. Conclusions

Neurotoxicity is a substantial dose-limiting factor in cisplatin treatment. Animal studies have delineated many molecular mechanisms related to the peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin. CIPN is multifactorial, with impacts on DNA, neuroimmune mechanisms, ion channel expression and function, and changes in GPCR activity. In this review, we highlight the involvement of ion channels and GPCRs in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy and demonstrate how these may represent potential targets for studying new therapeutic agents for this condition to provide safe and effective treatments to overcome the effects of neurotoxicity, enabling the complete treatment of cancer and improving the patient’s quality of life during treatment and after oncological treatment.

Author Contributions

G.B.: Designed the review, defined the search strategies and reviewed the literature, writing—review and editing. S.F.A.: Reviewed the literature, writing—review and editing. S.M.O.: Designed the review, defined the search strategies, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001; by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul-FAPERGS (Grant #21/2551-0001966-2) (Brazil); and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico (CNPq). CAPES/Programa de Excelência Acadêmica (PROEX) (process #88881.844988/2023-01; Grant: #1333/2023). Sara Marchesan Oliveira is a recipient of an award from CNPq (Grant #304985/2020-1). Gabriela Becker and Samuel Felipe Atuati are recipients of fellowship from CAPES/PROEX (process #88887.568915/2020-00, #88887.875443/2023-00, respectively). We also acknowledge fellowships from CNPq and CAPES.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HIV—human immunodeficiency virus; CIPN—chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; IASP—International Association for the Study of Pain; ICD-11—International Classification of Diseases; DRG—dorsal root ganglia; GPCR—G-coupled protein receptors; cAMP—cyclic adenosine monophosphate; PKA—protein kinase A; PLC—Phospholipase C; PKC—protein kinase C; IP3—Inositol triphosphate-3; DAG—Diacylglycerol; RhoGEFs—Guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the Rho; PKCε—protein kinase C epsilon; TRP—transient receptor potential; TRPA1—transient receptor potential ankyrin 1; TRPV1—transient receptor potential vanilloid 1; TRPV2—transient receptor potential vanilloid 2; TRPM8 –transient receptor potential melastin 8; AEA—Anandamide; CB1—cannabinoid receptor type 1; CB2—cannabinoid receptor type 2; 2-AG—2-arachidonoyl-glycerol; MGL—Monoacylglycerol lipase; FAAH—fatty acid amide hydrolase; GRK—G protein-coupled receptor kinase; K+—potassium; KCA—calcium-activated K+ channels; K2P—two-/tandem-pore domain; Kir—inwardly rectifying; CaV—voltage-gated calcium channel; Kv—voltage-gated K+ channel; Ca2+—calcium; ASIC—acid-sensitive ion channels.

References

  1. Costigan, M.; Scholz, J.; Woolf, C.J. Neuropathic Pain: A Maladaptive Response of the Nervous System to Damage. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 32, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Scholz, J.; Finnerup, N.B.; Attal, N.; Aziz, Q.; Baron, R.; Bennett, M.I.; Benoliel, R.; Cohen, M.; Cruccu, G.; Davis, K.D.; et al. The IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for ICD-11: Chronic Neuropathic Pain. Pain 2019, 160, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gilron, I.; Baron, R.; Jensen, T. Neuropathic Pain: Principles of Diagnosis and Treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2015, 90, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Colloca, L.; Ludman, T.; Bouhassira, D.; Baron, R.; Dickenson, A.H.; Yarnitsky, D.; Freeman, R.; Truini, A.; Attal, N.; Finnerup, N.B.; et al. Neuropathic Pain. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 16, 17002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Finnerup, N.B.; Kuner, R.; Jensen, T.S. Neuropathic Pain: From Mechanisms to Treatment. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 259–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bennett, M.I.; Kaasa, S.; Barke, A.; Korwisi, B.; Rief, W.; Treede, R.-D. The IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for ICD-11: Chronic Cancer-Related Pain. Pain 2019, 160, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Henson, L.A.; Maddocks, M.; Evans, C.; Davidson, M.; Hicks, S.; Higginson, I.J. Palliative Care and the Management of Common Distressing Symptoms in Advanced Cancer: Pain, Breathlessness, Nausea and Vomiting, and Fatigue. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zajączkowska, R.; Kocot-Kępska, M.; Leppert, W.; Wrzosek, A.; Mika, J.; Wordliczek, J. Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fallon, M.T. Neuropathic Pain in Cancer. Br. J. Anaesth. 2013, 111, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Starobova, H.; Vetter, I. Pathophysiology of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jayakar, S.; Shim, J.; Jo, S.; Bean, B.P.; Singeç, I.; Woolf, C.J. Developing Nociceptor-Selective Treatments for Acute and Chronic Pain. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabj9837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Wagle, N.S.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023, 73, 17–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kerns, S.L.; Fung, C.; Monahan, P.O.; Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard, S.; Abu Zaid, M.I.; Williams, A.L.M.; Stump, T.E.; Sesso, H.D.; Feldman, D.R.; Hamilton, R.J.; et al. Cumulative Burden of Morbidity among Testicular Cancer Survivors after Standard Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 1505–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rudin, C.M.; Ismaila, N.; Hann, C.L.; Malhotra, N.; Movsas, B.; Norris, K.; Pietanza, M.C.; Ramalingam, S.S.; Turrisi, A.T.; Giaccone, G. Treatment of Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the American College of Chest Physicians Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 4106–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. van Meerbeeck, J.P.; Fennell, D.A.; De Ruysscher, D.K.M. Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Lancet 2011, 378, 1741–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miller, K.D.; Nogueira, L.; Devasia, T.; Mariotto, A.B.; Yabroff, K.R.; Jemal, A.; Kramer, J.; Siegel, R.L. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 409–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Emery, J.; Butow, P.; Lai-Kwon, J.; Nekhlyudov, L.; Rynderman, M.; Jefford, M. Management of Common Clinical Problems Experienced by Survivors of Cancer. Lancet 2022, 399, 1537–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mantyh, P.W. Cancer Pain and Its Impact on Diagnosis, Survival and Quality of Life. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 797–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Glare, P.; Aubrey, K.; Gulati, A.; Lee, Y.C.; Moryl, N.; Overton, S. Pharmacologic Management of Persistent Pain in Cancer Survivors. Drugs 2022, 82, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fortin, J.; Leblanc, M.; Elgbeili, G.; Cordova, M.J.; Marin, M.-F.; Brunet, A. The Mental Health Impacts of Receiving a Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Meta-Analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 125, 1582–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Snijders, R.; Brom, L.; Theunissen, M.; van den Beuken-van Everdingen, M. Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2023, 15, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Evenepoel, M.; Haenen, V.; De Baerdemaecker, T.; Meeus, M.; Devoogdt, N.; Dams, L.; Van Dijck, S.; Van der Gucht, E.; De Groef, A. Pain Prevalence During Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2022, 63, e317–e335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cavaletti, G.; Alberti, P.; Argyriou, A.A.; Lustberg, M.; Staff, N.P.; Tamburin, S. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: A Multifaceted, Still Unsolved Issue. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2019, 24, S6–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Colvin, L.A. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Where Are We Now? Pain 2019, 160, S1–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Travis, L.B.; Fossa, S.D.; Sesso, H.D.; Frisina, R.D.; Herrmann, D.N.; Beard, C.J.; Feldman, D.R.; Pagliaro, L.C.; Miller, R.C.; Vaughn, D.J.; et al. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity and Ototoxicity: New Paradigms for Translational Genomics. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014, 106, dju044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Calls, A.; Carozzi, V.; Navarro, X.; Monza, L.; Bruna, J. Pathogenesis of Platinum-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: Insights from Preclinical Studies. Exp. Neurol. 2020, 325, 113141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dasari, S.; Tchounwou, P.B. Cisplatin in Cancer Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms of Action. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 740, 364–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alberti, P. Platinum-Drugs Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: Clinical Course and Preclinical Evidence. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2019, 15, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Perše, M. Cisplatin Mouse Models: Treatment, Toxicity and Translatability. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Avan, A.; Postma, T.J.; Ceresa, C.; Avan, A.; Cavaletti, G.; Giovannetti, E.; Peters, G.J. Platinum-Induced Neurotoxicity and Preventive Strategies: Past, Present, and Future. Oncologist 2015, 20, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rottenberg, S.; Disler, C.; Perego, P. The Rediscovery of Platinum-Based Cancer Therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Quintão, N.L.M.; Santin, J.R.; Stoeberl, L.C.; Corrêa, T.P.; Melato, J.; Costa, R. Pharmacological Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain: PPARγ Agonists as a Promising Tool. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Was, H.; Borkowska, A.; Bagues, A.; Tu, L.; Liu, J.Y.H.; Lu, Z.; Rudd, J.A.; Nurgali, K.; Abalo, R. Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 750507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fumagalli, G.; Monza, L.; Cavaletti, G.; Rigolio, R.; Meregalli, C. Neuroinflammatory Process Involved in Different Preclinical Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 626687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Carozzi, V.A.; Canta, A.; Chiorazzi, A. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: What Do We Know about Mechanisms? Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 596, 90–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. dos Santos, N.A.G.; Ferreira, R.S.; Santos, A.C. dos Overview of Cisplatin-Induced Neurotoxicity and Ototoxicity, and the Protective Agents. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 136, 111079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ibrahim, E.Y.; Ehrlich, B.E. Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Recent Findings. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2020, 145, 102831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Staff, N.P.; Cavaletti, G.; Islam, B.; Lustberg, M.; Psimaras, D.; Tamburin, S. Platinum-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: From Pathogenesis to Treatment. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2019, 24, S26–S39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Park, S.B.; Cetinkaya-Fisgin, A.; Argyriou, A.A.; Höke, A.; Cavaletti, G.; Alberti, P. Axonal Degeneration in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: Clinical and Experimental Evidence. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2023, 94, 962–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Krarup-Hansen, A.; Rietz, B.; Krarup, C.; Heydorn, K.; Rørth, M.; Schmalbruch, H. Histology and Platinum Content of Sensory Ganglia and Sural Nerves in Patients Treated with Cisplatin and Carboplatin: An Autopsy Study. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1999, 25, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Staff, N.P.; Grisold, A.; Grisold, W.; Windebank, A.J. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Current Review. Ann. Neurol. 2017, 81, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Smith, E.M.L.; Pang, H.; Cirrincione, C.; Fleishman, S.; Paskett, E.D.; Ahles, T.; Bressler, L.R.; Gilman, P.B.; Shapiro, C.L.; Chemotherapy-induced, W.; et al. Effect of Duloxetine on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life Among Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Painful Peripheral Neuropathy. JAMA Psychiatry 2013, 309, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Flatters, S.J.L.; Dougherty, P.M.; Colvin, L.A. Clinical and Preclinical Perspectives on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN): A Narrative Review. Br. J. Anaesth. 2017, 119, 737–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Albany, C.; Dockter, T.; Wolfe, E.; Le-Rademacher, J.; Wagner-Johnston, N.; Einhorn, L.; Lafky, J.M.; Smith, E.; Pachman, D.; Staff, N.; et al. Cisplatin-Associated Neuropathy Characteristics Compared with Those Associated with Other Neurotoxic Chemotherapy Agents (Alliance A151724). Support. Care Cancer 2021, 29, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Grisold, W.; Cavaletti, G.; Windebank, A.J. Peripheral Neuropathies from Chemotherapeutics and Targeted Agents: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention. Neuro. Oncol. 2012, 14, iv45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Loprinzi, C.L.; Lacchetti, C.; Bleeker, J.; Cavaletti, G.; Chauhan, C.; Hertz, D.L.; Kelley, M.R.; Lavino, A.; Lustberg, M.B.; Paice, J.A.; et al. Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Survivors of Adult Cancers: ASCO Guideline Update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 3325–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Argyriou, A.A.; Bruna, J.; Genazzani, A.A.; Cavaletti, G. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: Management Informed by Pharmacogenetics. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017, 13, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gottesman-Katz, L.; Latorre, R.; Vanner, S.; Schmidt, B.L.; Bunnett, N.W. Targeting G Protein-Coupled Receptors for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in the Digestive System. Gut 2021, 70, 970–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Geppetti, P.; Veldhuis, N.A.; Lieu, T.M.; Bunnett, N.W. G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Dynamic Machines for Signaling Pain and Itch. Neuron 2015, 88, 635–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wootten, D.; Christopoulos, A.; Marti-Solano, M.; Babu, M.M.; Sexton, P.M. Mechanisms of Signalling and Biased Agonism in G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 638–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Calebiro, D.; Koszegi, Z.; Lanoiseléee, Y.; Miljus, T.; O’brien, S. G Protein-Coupled Receptor-G Protein Interactions: A Single-Molecule Perspective. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 857–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Leeb-Lundberg, L.M.F.; Marceau, F.; Müller-Esterl, W.; Pettibone, D.J.; Zuraw, B.L. International Union of Pharmacology. XLV. Classification of the Kinin Receptor Family: From Molecular Mechanisms to Pathophysiological Consequences. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 27–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Becker, G.; Fialho, M.F.P.; Brusco, I.; Oliveira, S.M. Kinin B1 and B2 Receptors Contribute to Cisplatin-Induced Painful Peripheral Neuropathy in Male Mice. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Becker, G.; Fialho, M.F.P.; Brum, E.S.; Oliveira, S.M. Kinin B2 Receptor Mediates Cisplatin-Induced Painful Peripheral Neuropathy by Intracellular Kinase Pathways and TRPA1 Channel Sensitisation. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vincenzi, F.; Pasquini, S.; Borea, P.A.; Varani, K. Targeting Adenosine Receptors: A Potential Pharmacological Avenue for Acute and Chronic Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Haddad, M.; Cherchi, F.; Alsalem, M.; Al-saraireh, Y.M.; Madae’en, S. Adenosine Receptors as Potential Therapeutic Analgesic Targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zylka, M.J. Pain-Relieving Prospects for Adenosine Receptors and Ectonucleotidases. Trends Mol. Med. 2011, 17, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dewaeles, E.; Carvalho, K.; Fellah, S.; Sim, J.; Boukrout, N.; Caillierez, R.; Ramakrishnan, H.; Van der Hauwaert, C.; Vijaya Shankara, J.; Martin, N.; et al. Istradefylline Protects from Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Peripheral Neuropathy While Preserving Cisplatin Antitumor Effects. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e152924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Singh, A.K.; Mahalingam, R.; Squillace, S.; Jacobson, K.A.; Tosh, D.K.; Dharmaraj, S.; Farr, S.A.; Kavelaars, A.; Salvemini, D.; Heijnen, C.J. Targeting the A3 Adenosine Receptor to Prevent and Reverse Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicities in Mice. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2022, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Woodhams, S.G.; Chapman, V.; Finn, D.P.; Hohmann, A.G.; Neugebauer, V. The Cannabinoid System and Pain. Neuropharmacology 2017, 124, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. van den Hoogen, N.J.; Harding, E.K.; Davidson, C.E.D.; Trang, T. Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain: Therapeutic Potential Through Microglia Modulation. Front. Neural Circuits 2022, 15, 816747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vera, G.; Cabezos, P.A.; Martín, M.I.; Abalo, R. Characterization of Cannabinoid-Induced Relief of Neuropathic Pain in a Rat Model of Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathy. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2013, 105, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mulpuri, Y.; Marty, V.N.; Munier, J.J.; Mackie, K.; Schmidt, B.L.; Seltzman, H.H.; Spigelman, I. Synthetic Peripherally-Restricted Cannabinoid Suppresses Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Pain Symptoms by CB1 Receptor Activation. Neuropharmacology 2018, 139, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bagher, A.M.; Binmahfouz, L.S.; Shaik, R.A.; Eid, B.G. Cannabinoid Receptor 1 Positive Allosteric Modulator (GAT229) Attenuates Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathic Pain in Mice. Saudi Pharm. J. 2023, 31, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Deng, L.; Guindon, J.; Vemuri, V.K.; Thakur, G.A.; White, F.A.; Makriyannis, A.; Hohmann, A.G. The Maintenance of Cisplatin- and Paclitaxel-Induced Mechanical and Cold Allodynia Is Suppressed by Cannabinoid CB 2 Receptor Activation and Independent of CXCR4 Signaling in Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Mol. Pain 2012, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nealon, C.M.; Henderson-Redmond, A.N.; Hale, D.E.; Morgan, D.J. Tolerance to WIN55,212-2 Is Delayed in Desensitization-Resistant S426A/S430A Mice. Neuropharmacology 2019, 148, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Henderson-Redmond, A.N.; Nealon, C.M.; Davis, B.J.; Yuill, M.B.; Sepulveda, D.E.; Blanton, H.L.; Piscura, M.K.; Zee, M.L.; Haskins, C.P.; Marcus, D.J.; et al. C-Jun N Terminal Kinase Signaling Pathways Mediate Cannabinoid Tolerance in an Agonist-Specific Manner. Neuropharmacology 2020, 164, 107847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Henderson-Redmond, A.N.; Crawford, L.C.; Sepulveda, D.E.; Hale, D.E.; Lesperance, J.J.; Morgan, D.J. Sex Differences in Tolerance to Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Mice With Cisplatin-Evoked Chronic Neuropathic Pain. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Khasabova, I.A.; Khasabov, S.; Paz, J.; Harding-Rose, C.; Simone, D.A.; Seybold, V.S. Cannabinoid Type-1 Receptor Reduces Pain and Neurotoxicity Produced by Chemotherapy. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 7091–7101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Khasabova, I.A.; Yao, X.; Paz, J.; Lewandowski, C.T.; Lindberg, A.E.; Coicou, L.; Burlakova, N.; Simone, D.A.; Seybold, V.S. JZL184 Is Anti-Hyperalgesic in a Murine Model of Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Pharmacol. Res. 2014, 90, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Guindon, J.; Lai, Y.; Takacs, S.M.; Bradshaw, H.B.; Hohmann, A.G. Alterations in Endocannabinoid Tone Following Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Effects of Endocannabinoid Deactivation Inhibitors Targeting Fatty-Acid Amide Hydrolase and Monoacylglycerol Lipase in Comparison to Reference Analgesics Following C. Pharmacol. Res. 2013, 67, 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Thompson, J.M.; Blanton, H.L.; Pietrzak, A.; Little, W.; Sherfey, C.; Guindon, J. Front and Hind Paw Differential Analgesic Effects of Amitriptyline, Gabapentin, Ibuprofen, and URB937 on Mechanical and Cold Sensitivity in Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathy. Mol. Pain 2019, 15, 174480691987419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Uhelski, M.L.; Khasabova, I.A.; Simone, D.A. Inhibition of Anandamide Hydrolysis Attenuates Nociceptor Sensitization in a Murine Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. J. Neurophysiol. 2015, 113, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Basbaum, A.I.; Bautista, D.M.; Scherrer, G.; Julius, D. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Pain. Cell 2009, 139, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Benarroch, E.E. Ion Channels in Nociceptors. Neurology 2015, 84, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dai, Y. TRPs and Pain. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016, 38, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ta, L.E.; Bieber, A.J.; Carlton, S.M.; Loprinzi, C.L.; Low, P.A.; Windebank, A.J. Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 Is Essential for Cisplatin-Induced Heat Hyperalgesia in Mice. Mol. Pain 2010, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Meng, J.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, L.; You, M.; Xing, H.; Zhu, J. Berberine Alleviate Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy by Modulating Inflammation Signal via TRPV1. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 12, 774795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Nassini, R.; Gees, M.; Harrison, S.; De Siena, G.; Materazzi, S.; Moretto, N.; Failli, P.; Preti, D.; Marchetti, N.; Cavazzini, A.; et al. Oxaliplatin Elicits Mechanical and Cold Allodynia in Rodents via TRPA1 Receptor Stimulation. Pain 2011, 152, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shim, H.S.; Bae, C.; Wang, J.; Lee, K.-H.; Hankerd, K.M.; Kim, H.K.; Chung, J.M.; La, J.-H. Peripheral and Central Oxidative Stress in Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain. Mol. Pain 2019, 15, 174480691984009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ta, L.E.; Low, P.A.; Windebank, A.J. Mice with Cisplatin and Oxaliplatin-Induced Painful Neuropathy Develop Distinct Early Responses to Thermal Stimuli. Mol. Pain 2009, 5, 1744–8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hori, K.; Ozaki, N.; Suzuki, S.; Sugiura, Y. Upregulations of P2X3 and ASIC3 Involve in Hyperalgesia Induced by Cisplatin Administration in Rats. Pain 2010, 149, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Leo, M.; Schmitt, L.I.; Küsterarent, P.; Kutritz, A.; Rassaf, T.; Kleinschnitz, C.; Hendgen-Cotta, U.B.; Hagenacker, T. Platinum-Based Drugs Cause Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cultured Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Simms, B.A.; Zamponi, G.W. Neuronal Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels: Structure, Function, and Dysfunction. Neuron 2014, 82, 24–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Tomaszewski, A.; Büsselberg, D. Cisplatin Modulates Voltage Gated Channel Currents of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons of Rats. Neurotoxicology 2007, 28, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Leo, M.; Schmitt, L.-I.; Erkel, M.; Melnikova, M.; Thomale, J.; Hagenacker, T. Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathic Pain Is Mediated by Upregulation of N-Type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. Exp. Neurol. 2017, 288, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Leo, M.; Schmitt, L.I.; Jastrow, H.; Thomale, J.; Kleinschnitz, C.; Hagenacker, T. Cisplatin Alters the Function and Expression of N-Type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels in the Absence of Morphological Damage of Sensory Neurons. Mol. Pain 2017, 13, 1744806917746565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Shahid, M.; Subhan, F.; Ahmad, N.; Sewell, R.D.E. Efficacy of a Topical Gabapentin Gel in a Cisplatin Paradigm of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019, 20, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Ahmad, N.; Subhan, F.; Islam, N.U.; Shahid, M.; Rahman, F.U.; Sewell, R.D.E. Gabapentin and Its Salicylaldehyde Derivative Alleviate Allodynia and Hypoalgesia in a Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathic Pain Model. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 814, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Seto, Y.; Takase, M.; Tsuji, Y.; To, H. Pregabalin Reduces Cisplatin-Induced Mechanical Allodynia in Rats. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 134, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Park, H.J.; Stokes, J.A.; Pirie, E.; Skahen, J.; Shtaerman, Y.; Yaksh, T.L. Persistent Hyperalgesia in the Cisplatin-Treated Mouse as Defined by Threshold Measures, the Conditioned Place Preference Paradigm, and Changes in Dorsal Root Ganglia Activated Transcription Factor 3. Anesth. Analg. 2013, 116, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kuo, A.; Corradini, L.; Nicholson, J.R.; Smith, M.T. Assessment of the Anti-Allodynic and Anti-Hyperalgesic Efficacy of a Glycine Transporter 2 Inhibitor Relative to Pregabalin, Duloxetine and Indomethacin in a Rat Model of Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wermeling, D.P. Ziconotide, an Intrathecally Administered N-Type Calcium Channel Antagonist for the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Pharmacotherapy 2005, 25, 1084–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hasan, M.M.; Starobova, H.; Mueller, A.; Vetter, I.; Lewis, R.J. Subcutaneous ω-Conotoxins Alleviate Mechanical Pain in Rodent Models of Acute Peripheral Neuropathy. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Nodera, H.; Spieker, A.; Sung, M.; Rutkove, S. Neuroprotective Effects of Kv7 Channel Agonist, Retigabine, for Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 505, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Leo, M.; Schmitt, L.I.; Kutritz, A.; Kleinschnitz, C.; Hagenacker, T. Cisplatin-Induced Activation and Functional Modulation of Satellite Glial Cells Lead to Cytokine-Mediated Modulation of Sensory Neuron Excitability. Exp. Neurol. 2021, 341, 113695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Finno, C.J.; Chen, Y.; Park, S.; Lee, J.H.; Perez-Flores, M.C.; Choi, J.; Yamoah, E.N. Cisplatin Neurotoxicity Targets Specific Subpopulations and K+ Channels in Tyrosine-Hydroxylase Positive Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 853035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Akbar, S.; Subhan, F.; Shahid, M.; Wadood, A.; Shahbaz, N.; Farooq, U.; Ayaz, M.; Raziq, N. 6-Methoxyflavanone Abates Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathic Pain apropos Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms: A Behavioral and Molecular Simulation Study. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 872, 172972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shahid, M.; Subhan, F.; Ahmad, N.; Sewell, R.D.E. The Flavonoid 6-Methoxyflavone Allays Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathic Allodynia and Hypoalgesia. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 95, 1725–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 16 00580 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the primary molecular mechanisms implicated in cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Once inside the neuron, cisplatin can bind to both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. At the mitochondrial level, the DNA-cisplatin adducts disrupt their overall function, leading to increased ROS formation. Collectively, these events result in neuronal death via apoptosis. Parts of the Figure were drawn using pictures from Servier Medical Art by Servier, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the primary molecular mechanisms implicated in cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Once inside the neuron, cisplatin can bind to both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. At the mitochondrial level, the DNA-cisplatin adducts disrupt their overall function, leading to increased ROS formation. Collectively, these events result in neuronal death via apoptosis. Parts of the Figure were drawn using pictures from Servier Medical Art by Servier, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license.
Cancers 16 00580 g001
Cancers 16 00580 g002
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the principal GPCRs involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. The Figure demonstrates kinin B1 and B2 receptors, adenosine receptors, and CB1 and CB2 receptors involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Parts of the Figure were drawn using pictures from Servier Medical Art by Servier, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the principal GPCRs involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. The Figure demonstrates kinin B1 and B2 receptors, adenosine receptors, and CB1 and CB2 receptors involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Parts of the Figure were drawn using pictures from Servier Medical Art by Servier, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license.
Cancers 16 00580 g002
Cancers 16 00580 g003
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the principal ion channels involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. The Figure demonstrates TRPA1, TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPM8, ASIC3, potassium, and calcium channels involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Parts of the Figure were drawn using pictures from Servier Medical Art by Servier, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the principal ion channels involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. The Figure demonstrates TRPA1, TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPM8, ASIC3, potassium, and calcium channels involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. Parts of the Figure were drawn using pictures from Servier Medical Art by Servier, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license.
Cancers 16 00580 g003
Table 1. In vivo preclinical studies of GPCRs involvement in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy model.
Table 1. In vivo preclinical studies of GPCRs involvement in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy model.
TargetsIntracellular G Protein SubtypesPharmacological and Genetic ApproachesObserved EffectsReferences
Kinin B1 receptorGqDALBkReduced mechanical and cold allodyniaBecker et al. [54,55]
DABkEnhanced mechanical allodyniaBecker et al. [54]
Antisense oligonucleotidesAttenuated mechanical allodyniaBecker et al. [54]
Kinin B2 receptorGqIcatibantReduced mechanical and cold allodyniaBecker et al. [54,55]
BkEnhanced mechanical allodyniaBecker et al. [54]
Antisense oligonucleotidesAttenuated mechanical allodyniaBecker et al. [54]
Adenosine 2A receptorGqIstradefylline (KW6002)Reduced mechanical hypersensitivityDewaeles et al. [59]
Adenosine 3A receptorGqMRS5890Prevented cisplatin-induced mechanical allodynia and spontaneous painSingh et al. [60]
Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R)GiACEAAlleviated mechanical allodyniaVera et al. [63]
4-{2-[-(1E)-1[(4-propylnaphthalen-1-yl)methylidene]-1H-inden-3-yl]ethyl}morpholine (PrNMI)Attenuated mechanical and cold allodyniaMulpuri et al. [64]
GAT229Attenuated and slowed progression of mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesiaBagher et al. [65]
Cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2R)GiAM1710Attenuated mechanical and cold allodyniaDeng et al. [66]
JWH-133Reduced mechanical allodyniaVera et al. [63]
Reduced mRNA levels of CB2R in the DRGMulpuri et al. [64]
Reduced CB2R protein in the skin paw and spinal cordKhasabova et al. [71]
Cannabinoid receptor type 1 and 2GiURB597, URB937 and JZL184Reduced mechanical and cold allodyniaGuindon et al. [72]
Khasabova et al. [71]
Khasabova et al. [70]
Thompson et al. [73]
Uhelski et al. [74]
WIN55,212–2Attenuated mechanical allodyniaNealon et al. [67]
Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolReduced mechanical allodyniaHenderson-Redmond et al. [69]
Abbreviations—ACEA: selective CB1R agonist; AM1710: CB2R agonist; Bk: bradykinin (kinin B2 receptor agonist); cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1R); cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2R); DABk: des-Arg9-bradykinin (kinin B1 receptor agonist); DALBk: des-Arg9[Leu8]-bradykinin (kinin B1 receptor antagonist); DRG: (Dorsal Root Ganglia); GAT229: CB1R-positive allosteric modulator; JZL184: monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL) inhibitor; JWH-133: CB2R agonist; URB937: peripheral fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor; URB597: central FAAH inhibitor; WIN55,212–2: non-selective CB1/CB2 receptor agonist.
Table 2. In vivo preclinical studies of ion channels involvement in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy model.
Table 2. In vivo preclinical studies of ion channels involvement in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy model.
TargetsPharmacological and Genetic ApproachesObserved EffectsReferences
TRPV1 channelC57Bl6 TRPV1−/−Prevented the development of heat hyperalgesiaTa et al. [80];
Meng et al. [81]
QX-314Inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity Shim et al. [83]
Increased the mRNA levels in DRG neuron cultureTa et al. [80]
No change in the TRPV1 immunoreactivity profiles in DRG and trigeminal ganglia neuronKhasabova et al. [70]
Ta et al. [80]
No changes in TRPV1-positive cells of DRG and trigeminal ganglia neuronsHori et al. [84]
TRPA1 channelC57Bl6 TRPA1−/−Avoided the development of mechanical allodyniaNassini et al. [82]
Allyl isothiocyanate Increased mechanical allodyniaBecker et al. [55]
A967079Attenuated mechanical allodyniaBecker et al. [54]
QX-314Inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity Shim et al. [83]
Increased TRPA1 mRNA levels in DRG neuron cultureTa et al. [80]
TRPM8 channel Increased mRNA levels in DRG neurons cultureTa et al. [80]
TRPV2 channel Increased TRPV2 expression in DRG neurons Hori et al. [84]
N-type CaV channelsω-conotoxin MVIIAIncreased channel protein expression in DRG neuronsLeo et al. [88]
Increased the expression of α1β and α2δ1 subunits in DRG neuronsLeo et al. [87]
Prevented the development of mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesiaLeo et al. [87,88]
ω-conotoxins MVIIA, GVIA, and CVIFFailed to reduce mechanical allodynia after intraplantar administrationHasan et al. [95]
KV7 channelRetigabinePrevented membrane depolarization and peripheral axon lossNodera et al. [96]
ASIC3 Increased ASIC3 protein expressionHori et al. [84]
AmilorideAlleviated cutaneous and muscular hyperalgesiaHori et al. [84]
Abbreviations—ASIC: acid-sensitive ion channel; A967079: TRPA1 channel antagonist; DRG: (Dorsal Root Ganglia); QX-314: lidocaine analogue; TRPA1: transient receptor potential ankyrin 1; TRPA1−/−: TRPA1 knockout mice; TRPM8: transient receptor potential melastin 8; TRPV1: transient receptor potential vanilloid 1; TRPV1−/−: TRPV1 knockout mice; TRPV2: transient receptor potential vanilloid 2.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Becker, G.; Atuati, S.F.; Oliveira, S.M. G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Ion Channels Involvement in Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Preclinical Studies. Cancers 2024, 16, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030580

AMA Style

Becker G, Atuati SF, Oliveira SM. G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Ion Channels Involvement in Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Preclinical Studies. Cancers. 2024; 16(3):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Becker, Gabriela, Samuel Felipe Atuati, and Sara Marchesan Oliveira. 2024. "G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Ion Channels Involvement in Cisplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Preclinical Studies" Cancers 16, no. 3: 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16030580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop