Next Article in Journal
DSADNet: A Dual-Source Attention Dynamic Neural Network for Precipitation Nowcasting
Previous Article in Journal
Integration of Building Information Modeling and Stormwater Runoff Modeling: Enhancing Design Tools for Nature-Based Solutions in Sustainable Landscapes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Evaluation of Gypsum-Based Plasters with Pistachio Shells for Eco-Sustainable Building

by
Federica Fernandez
1,2,*,
Maria Grazia Insinga
2,
Roberta Basile
2,
Federica Zagarella
2,
Roberta Montagno
2 and
Maria Luisa Germanà
1
1
Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
2
Istituto Euro-Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia, 90143 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(9), 3695; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093695
Submission received: 31 January 2024 / Revised: 29 March 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 28 April 2024

Abstract

:
Agri-food waste represents a serious problem that can be overcome by converting it into added-value material for the production of plasters for green building; in fact, it can be used as a reinforcement additive in the building material industry. In this study, the performance of gypsum-based plasters with pistachio shell additives was evaluated. Before being used as additives for gypsum-based plasters, pistachio shells were ground at three different grain sizes in order to verify how grain size influences the performance of the material. Tests were then carried out on all the produced mortars to evaluate their chemical and physical characteristics, and interesting results regarding the mechanical resistance of some of the produced materials were obtained. The results showed that the addition of pistachio shells improved mechanical performance in all cases and that the best mechanical performance and water absorption by capillarity were achieved with the 0.5–2 mm pistachio grain size, while the best thermal conductivity was achieved with the 2–4 mm grain size. Summarizing, the best results were obtained with a pistachio shell granulometry of 0.5–2 mm, sand, and a water/gypsum ratio of 0.86–0.74.

1. Introduction

We can consider as waste any material that, at the end of any production process, is useless, destined for disposal. In recent decades, the production of waste has progressively increased as a direct consequence of economic and industrial development, population growth and the expansion of urban areas. Problems relating to disposal have assumed increasing proportions, partly due to the multiplication of the types of waste produced, which are increasingly harmful to the environment and to the health of living beings. In terms of environmental balance, the increasing amount of produced waste is related to the depletion of the earth’s resources, and disposal involves a significant loss of materials and energy.
Building materials are one of the main factors influencing the overall environmental impact of the construction industry due to their production, transportation, use and end of life [1]. To reduce this problem, some strategies have been identified, such as the usage of environmentally friendly materials, the use of local materials and the encouragement of circular economy practices [2]. J. Bolden et al. [3] investigated the strengths and weaknesses of the practice of supporting the construction industry in developing effective policies regarding the use of waste and recycled materials as building materials.
According to the Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC), “recycling” is “any recovery operation through which waste materials are reprocessed to obtain products, materials or substances to be used for their original function or for other purposes” [4]. If recycling, reuse or other treatment operations result in “secondary raw materials” being obtained from waste, this also constitutes a “recovery” operation (Dir 2006/12/EC) [5].
To date, research has aimed at investigating the possibility of using recycled aggregates (RAs) derived from the reuse of construction and demolition waste [6] or natural materials with possible advantages, such as low environmental impacts, low energy demands, low costs, large-scale availability, biodegradability, and good insulating and mechanical properties, as additives in construction products. A. A. Sundarraj and T. V. Ranganathan, in their studies, investigated the possibility of using cellulose extracted from agro-industrial waste as a reinforcement for the building material industry [7].
Current research on biobased lightweight mortars focuses mainly on physical (workability, density, porosity, etc.) and mechanical (compressive strength, tensile strength, elastic modulus, etc.) properties. Generally, bioaggregates possess high porosity and low specific gravity, which make significant contributions to the functional properties of mortars and concrete, such as thermal insulation and sound absorption properties. Currently, various biobased aggregates have been successfully added in the mix design of mortars, for instance, pistachio shells [8,9,10], date seeds [11], coconut shells [12,13,14], bamboo [15], apricot shells [16] and seashells [17]. Other studies concerned with the realization of composites have used rice straw [18]; rice husks [19]; bagasse, i.e., the residue from the grinding and pressing of sugar cane [20]; corn cobs [21,22]; pineapple leaves [23]; coffee chaff [24]; coffee grounds [25,26]; sunflower seeds [27,28]; durian peel and coconut coir [29]; peanut shells [30,31]; walnut shells [32]; Opuntia [33]; hemp [34]; and flax fibers [35]. According to [36], the adoption of biobased building materials can imply not only a reduction in environmental impact compared to traditional materials but also a reduction in production costs.
Most of these products have not yet been industrialized and marketed, but they potentially represent a sustainable alternative for the green building sector, with performance values comparable to those of commercial products, and in some cases achieve better results, particularly with respect to thermal and acoustic insulation properties [37]. Some research has also shown how natural fibers can effectively contribute to increasing the mechanical resistance of mortars. Wu et al. demonstrated, for example, how fibers of miscanthus, a common grass, improved the compressive and flexural strength of cement mortar by 82.7% and 26.9%, respectively, due to reduced porosity [38]. Affan et al. [39] experimented with cement-based mortars to which wood ash from wood incineration and vegetable aggregates (sunflower plant bark and pith) were added and found that the mortar prepared with sunflower bark had a better mechanical resistance than that made with pith.
However, the outcomes are not always positive; for example, the studies by Nguyen et al. [17] found that the freeze–thaw performance of mortars with additives from marine shells was significantly lower than that of the same mortars without additives due to the dissociation of the calcium carbonate present in the shells.
In addition, biobased light aggregates are made up of carbohydrates and are porous, so they are particularly sensitive to changes in ambient humidity; as a result, they can have a negative impact on durability, especially on water-related properties, such as shrinkage from drying and resistance to freeze–thaw. However, some studies have shown that the heat treatment of biobased additives can significantly reduce the shrinkage of mortar, increasing its resistance to freeze–thaw due to reduced microcracking and porosity [40].
In general, territorial dynamics play an important role in the implementation of the circular economy, which is oriented towards the recovery and minimization of waste and must be associated with experimental studies on the characteristics and quality of local materials [6,41,42,43,44]. In particular, the cultural premises of this study refer to the shared identity between Sicily and Tunisia, focused by a recent strategic cross-border cooperation project [45]. In fact, the present experimental research focused on two materials that are easy to find in these places, applying a replicable method to other regions in the Mediterranean area.
Pistachio is widely used in Sicilian and Tunisian gastronomy and confectionery. Pistachio shells are a waste of highly consolidated industrial realities spread on a regional scale in Sicily. Gypsum is present in the geological texture of southern Sicily and northern Tunisia and is widespread in historical and vernacular architecture in both regions. This research, therefore, focuses on the use of pistachio shells in manufacturing gypsum-based plasters, a traditional local material [46,47,48,49,50] widely used as plaster due to its low cost and good fire resistance [51]. Indeed, further development of this research could include assessment of fire resistance through combustion experiments.
Pistachio shells have been used to try to overcome the limitations presented by gypsum, such as low mechanical resistance, high water absorption and low thermal insulation properties [52]. Several tests were carried out on the composed materials to verify their mechanical and physical properties, and the results of the comparative investigations showed interesting results in terms of mechanical resistance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Method and Phases

For the development of this research, gypsum-based plaster mortars with the addition of pistachio shells were tested as ground plaster and internal and/or external finishing plaster; all samples were made according to the UNI EN 13279-2 standard [53].
The adopted method was based on the drafting of summary records of all the activities carried out. Filing allows for a homogeneous collection of data and easy archiving and consultation of the latter and the results obtained.
In particular, for each aggregate, a record card was created containing the following information:
  • Operators;
  • Material;
  • Grain size;
  • The manufacturer who supplied the aggregate;
  • The specific weight of the aggregate;
  • Preparation methods;
  • Notes.
Regarding the mix designs, record cards were also filled that contained the following information:
  • Sample name;
  • Realization date;
  • Operators;
  • Composition of the mix design;
  • Percentage by weight of binder, aggregates and water;
  • Workability of the dough;
  • Photos of the realized samples;
  • Notes.
Examples of record cards are shown in Figure 1.
After the material selection and the mix design definition, different sizes of mortar samples were produced. After the necessary seasoning, the samples were tested in the laboratory to evaluate their performances, such as mechanical resistance, thermal insulation and behavior over time.
During the production phase, tests were carried out to quantify the correct water/binder ratio, as indicated in the UNI EN 13279-2 standard [53], in order to guarantee adequate workability characteristics of the mortar and certain solid-state performances in mechanical, chemical and physical terms. Through the use of pistachio shells, we also attempted to increase the efficiency and performance of the basic mixture which constituted the matrix by analyzing its new characteristics.
The project’s activities were divided into five phases:
  • Identification of raw materials;
  • Production of mortars;
  • Basic characterization;
  • Aging tests;
  • Comparative tests.
In the first phase, the materials to be used for the production of the mortars were identified; in particular, we chose to use gypsum from the Trapani area manufacturers in Sicily and pistachio shell agricultural waste from local Sicilian production based in Bronte (CT), Sicily.
The second phase involved the production of samples with aggregates of different granulometries in order to verify how these influenced the workability and spreadability of the plasters, followed by a curing phase in which the samples were conserved for 7 days at a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C with a relative air humidity of 50 ± 5% and subsequently dried to a constant mass at a temperature of 40 ± 2 °C as per the UNI EN 13279-2 standard [53]. After curing, in the third phase, preliminary tests were carried out to evaluate the performance characteristics of the produced mortars. In the fourth phase, the durability and behavior of the materials over time were evaluated by subjecting the samples to artificial aging cycles and repeating some of the characterization tests. The last phase involved carrying out tests on post-aging samples to verify whether there were any variations in the performance characteristics of the produced materials.

2.2. Gypsum

The term gypsum generally indicates both the natural mineral and the industrial product derived from it and, sometimes, also indicates the chemical compound of these two substances.
Gypsum is an inorganic compound that has sedimented in some deposits in remote geological times. In nature, this mineral is found in two different forms, namely, anhydrous calcium sulphate (CaSO4) and dihydrated calcium sulphate (CaSO4·2H2O). The difference between the two forms lies in the fact that in the second case a certain quantity of water of crystallization is present in the crystals [52,54], and from a chemical point of view, the material occurs in different forms depending on the content of crystallization water.
Gypsum is a white mineral that, depending on the degree of purity and the type and quantity of impurities present, can take on shades that vary from gray to reddish [55].
If anhydrous calcium sulphate is present in a quarry, the extracted material will not require subsequent crushing to be reduced to powder—a process which must be carried out in the case of dihydrated sulphate. Furthermore, in the case of bihydrated sulphate, following grinding, there is a cooking phase for the total or partial elimination of the crystallization water present in the mineral, which determines the technical characteristics and methods of use of the gypsum.
During cooking, once it reaches 128 °C, the chalky rock loses approximately 6% of its crystallization water: this forms a semi-hydrated calcium sulphate (CaSO4·(1/2)H2O, which has a setting time which varies between 1 and 4 min), which when it comes into contact with water transforms back into the starting material.
Between 150 °C and 180 °C, the crystallization water is completely eliminated and the soluble anhydrite CaSO4 (α) begins to form, the setting time of which is approximately 20 min: above 180 °C, the speed of this transformation is increased significantly. If cooking is carried out above 250 °C, insoluble anhydrite CaSO4(β) is formed. At higher temperatures, the formation of insoluble anhydride continues, and at 1200 °C, CaO + SO3, i.e., calcium monoxide (quicklime) and sulfuric anhydride, is formed.
After cooking, there is a second grinding process necessary to obtain a homogeneous product that is easily usable and which guarantees perfect implementation. Generally, the cooked gypsum is finely ground, with grain sizes between 150 and 600 µm.
The construction plasters found on the market are made up of semi-hydrated plaster or soluble anhydride or a mixture of them.
The wall plaster used in this study was a powdered product based on hemihydrate gypsum classified according to the European standard EN 13279-1 [56] as A1/A2/A3/7.
Table 1 shows the technical data sheet characteristics of the wall gypsum used to produce the samples.

2.3. Pistachio Shells

According to FAOstat (2020) data [57], in 2018, 90% of pistachios were produced by the United States, Turkey and Iran, with a production of 1,239,007 tons/year. In Italy, in total, around 300 thousand tons of nuts are produced per year, and, according to ISTAT data from 2017 [58], pistachio areas in Italy do not exceed 4000 hectares, for a production of just under 4 thousand tons, concentrated almost exclusively in Sicily. At present, pistachio shells do not have an industrial use or significant economic value, and this is why they are burned or disposed of in landfills [59].
The pistachio shell makes up between 51% and 69% of the weight of the fruit [60]. Furthermore, the weight loss of the pistachio shell is approximately 75–80% during the heating phase due to its high cellulose structure [61,62]. Pistachio shells are a biomass composed mainly of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin; they have a rather regular shape; and the size is close to that of the pellet. The pistachio shells used in this work were ground using a high-power electric grinder (2.5 kW) with a high number of laps due to their high elasticity and mechanical resistance: 36,000 r/min for 1 min. Following the grinding process, the product obtained was sieved in order to separate the different grain sizes obtained. Three different grain sizes were produced:
  • Pg pistachio shells with dimensions ranging from 2 to 4 mm;
  • Pf pistachio shells with dimensions of 0.5–2 mm;
  • Ps pistachio shells with dimensions < 0.5 mm.
The products obtained from grinding are shown in Figure 2.

2.4. Sample Preparation and Mix Design

As regards the preparation of the specimens and the production procedures, a mixer compliant with the UNI EN 13279-2 standard [53] was used which was equipped with a steel cup and a mixing blade connected to an electronic control system for speed and rotation.
To determine the consistency of the fresh mortar, the shake table method was adopted in accordance with UNI EN 13279-2 [53]. The test determines the consistency of mortar by measuring its spreading. The equipment consists of a circular table with a shaft mounted on a sturdy frame through which it is possible to apply vertical shocks of standard energy defined by the stroke of the shaft.
The mortar is positioned inside a bronze cone, placed in the center of the circular table and compacted with a pestle to settle it in the truncated cone specimen, ensuring uniform filling. Once the cone has been raised after a period of between 10 and 15 s, 15 shocks are applied in 15 s, and at the end, the spreading of the mortar, i.e., its diameter expressed in millimeters, is measured. For the good workability of the mortar so that it can be used for plasters, it is necessary to adopt a spreading which can vary from 160 to 165 mm (with a tolerance of ±5 mm), as prescribed by the UNI EN 13279-2 standard [53].
According to the above-mentioned standard and according to the classification of the analyzed mortar, since it is a masonry plaster, for all the mix designs created, we stuck to spreading values between 160 and 165 mm.
The mixtures were prepared in steel molds, the walls of which were appropriately treated with a release agent. Once an adequate degree of resistance was reached, the specimens were removed from the molds. They were subsequently placed in a curing environment maintained at a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C and a relative humidity of no less than 50% ± 5% for 7 days, as in real operating conditions.
Subsequently, they were dried to constant mass at a temperature of 40 ± 2 °C. After drying, the samples were allowed to cool to room temperature.
All the samples were classified with a characteristic nomenclature, and the samples that underwent an aging process and on which tests were carried out before and after exposure to physical–mechanical and hydrothermal stress conditions were cataloged and filed.
To evaluate each mix, the samples shown in Table 2 were created.
Some of the samples made are shown in Figure 3.
The compositions of the mix designs listed above are shown in Table 3.
To evaluate the adhesion of the mixtures, they were applied on tiles measuring 10 × 10 × 0.5 cm, as shown in Figure 4.

2.5. Tests Carried Out

The produced samples were subjected to different tests aimed at characterizing the new mix designs and evaluating the eventual performance improvements compared to the mortars that were not prepared with additives. The mechanical resistance and the water absorption were evaluated, as well as the maintenance of the obtained results after exposure to artificial ageing.
Moreover, in order to evaluate the possible contribution of the additives to improving the energy performance of buildings, measurements were carried out for the evaluation of thermal conductivity.

2.5.1. Mechanical Properties

Following the 7-day curing period, all the specimens were subjected to compressive and flexion strength tests as prescribed by the UNI EN 13279-2 standard [53].
Figure 5 shows an example of a flexion test performed on the samples.

2.5.2. Water Absorption Tests

The water circulation tests by capillarity absorption were carried out before and after the artificial aging tests in order to verify both the ability of each mortar mix design to absorb water and to verify how this property was maintained over time.
The water absorption/desorption test by capillarity, as defined by the UNI 10859:2000 standard [63], is based on the measurement of the increase in the mass of a specimen of stone material in contact with deionized water per unit of surface as a function of time.
For the test, 3 samples measuring 16 cm × 16 cm × 4 cm of each type of mortar mix design were examined.
After the complete drying of the samples, they were placed in a basin, kept away from the base thanks to filter paper discs, and immersed in water to a depth of 5 mm. The water level was kept constant during the entire test.
The specimens were weighed, after swabbing with a damp cloth, at different time intervals: 10, 20, 30, 60, 240, 360, 1440, 2880 and 4320 min, with the time intervals adjusted according to the recommendations in the standard UNI 10859:2000 [63] for stone materials to assess gypsum behavior. From the weight values, it was possible to obtain the coefficient of water absorption by capillarity, which corresponds to the slope of the straight line that joins the points representing the measurements carried out at the time intervals. The test for calculating the imbibition coefficient was carried out in compliance with the CNR BU standard n. 137/92 (Regulations on aggregates–Determination of the imbibition coefficient) [64], and the calculation of the imbibition coefficient used the following formula:
C i i = m 1,1 m 2,1 m 2,1 · 100
where
  • m1,i indicates the mass expressed in grams of wet material for the reference specimen, i;
  • m2,i indicates the mass expressed in grams of dry material for the reference specimen, i.
Figure 6 shows an example of a capillary water absorption test.

2.5.3. Thermal Conductivity Measurements

Thermal conductivity measurements were carried on in order to compare the thermal properties of the various mix designs and verify whether the addition of biobased aggregates brought about improvements in terms of thermal insulation. The tests were conducted on samples measuring 20 cm × 20 cm × 2 cm using the ISOMET 2114 thermofluximeter, from Applied Precision s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia (Figure 7).
The instrument is used to determine the thermal properties of different isotropic materials, including insulating ones, and is widely used in the literature for the determination of the thermal conductivity of building materials [65,66,67,68,69]. The ISOMET 2114 is a commercial portable microprocessor-controlled instrument for direct measurement of the thermal conductivity coefficient of materials and is equipped with two types of measurement probes: a needle probe (for unconsolidated and composite materials) and a surface probe (for solid consolidated and composite materials).
In principle, the time dependence of the thermal response to the impulse transmitted by the heat flow in the material to be measured is analyzed. The heat flow is generated by the electrical energy dissipated through the probe, which is in direct contact with the measured material being processed. The resistance-dependent temperature is detected by a semiconductor sensor, and time variation in the temperature is sampled at discrete points (the regression polynomials passing through the samples are constructed using the “least squares method”, and the coefficients of the relevant regression polynomials allow the analytical calculation of required parameters). For a measurement ranging from 0.015 to 0.700 W/m·K, the ISOMET 2114 thermofluximeter guarantees an overall relative measurement uncertainty ≈ 5% [65].
For each specimen, 10 measurements were performed, using the surface probe and a measurement range of 0.04–0.3 W/m·K, with a built-in memory and calibration constants stored in the memory.

2.5.4. Aging Tests

In order to evaluate the behavior of the mortars over time and their durability under operating conditions, a selection of the samples were subjected to different artificial aging cycles to evaluate any changes upon exposure to thermo-hygrometric stress conditions.
After waiting for suitable curing, the mortar samples measuring 16 cm × 4 cm × 4 cm were placed in controlled climatic conditions of temperature and humidity for the period necessary to achieve a constant weight and hygrometric balance with the environment.
Two accelerated aging protocols were defined for the samples made. Before each test and during the execution phases, the effects of degradation were evaluated through several intermediate measurements.
The aging protocols adopted are shown in Table 4.
Figure 8 shows the samples in the climate aging chamber.
A summary of all adopted methods and instruments is reported in Table 5.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanical Properties before and after Aging

All samples were subjected to bending and compression tests as prescribed by the UNI EN 13279-2 standard [53]. Table 6 summarizes the results obtained from the tests carried out and the identification of the specimens on which they were carried out.
Mechanical tests were also carried out by changing only the water/gypsum ratio of the mortar to verify how the mechanical properties of the material varied. Below is the table reporting the results of the tests.
In general, it was noted that most of the biobased mix designs exhibited increased compression resistance compared to a regular gypsum mortar plaster without biobased aggregates (GS), with values of around 3 MPa, the mechanical performance being improved due to the elastic behavior of the pistachio shells.
The presence of sand in the mix designs, especially in GSPf.2, GSPf and GPsLfS.3, appeared to contribute to the increased mechanical resistance of the mortar, as the greatest granulometry variety increased the compactness and the better distribution of mechanical forces.
As regards the GPsPg sample, no further tests were carried out following the aging, as the sample showed the visible presence of mold on the surface.
The results relating to the post-aging mechanical tests are shown in Table 7, with best results in bold.
Considering the results obtained from the mechanical tests, it was noted that aging caused no evident reduction in the mechanical compressive strength of the different materials. It was noted that the mix design that presented the best results was GSPf.2, made up of gypsum, sand and finely ground pistachio shells, this design obtaining higher compressive strengths. The best results were due to the better ratio between the aggregates, the presence of ground pistachios and sand, and a balanced water and chalk ratio.
Finally, it could be interesting to compare these mechanical resistance data with those of other mixtures of biomass aggregate mortars present in the literature to evaluate the validity of the tested mortar, although it should be underlined that there are substantial methodological differences between studies. For instance, in [51], the authors tested different samples made of gypsum (95–97.5% of weight) and crushed straw (2.5–5.0%), obtaining high variability in terms of compressive strength values (3.09–14.93 MPa). Anyway, it can be noted that the values in the previous study were generally higher than those in this study due to a higher percentage of gypsum than that adopted in the present case (40–55%).

3.2. Water Absorption Tests

The results relating to the capillarity absorption tests carried out before the aging tests highlight different imbibition capacities for the mortars examined. This behavior could be attributable to the different compositions of the mortars corresponding to the presence of aggregates with different grain sizes. The water absorption dynamics of the various samples present an almost similar trend for all the specimens examined. For the various types of mortar, there was a rapid increase in the quantity of water absorbed in the first 240 min. For all samples, the test ended after 4320 min, as the mass appeared to have stabilized by this point. This was due to the fact that the common matrix was gypsum, a material that tends to be very water absorbent.
Table 8 reports the imbibition coefficient values for the various tested samples, with best results in bold.
Figure 9 and Figure 10 show, respectively, the trends of the absorption and desorption curves for the various mix designs tested. The desorption curves were obtained by weighing the samples in the same time intervals used for the absorption test to check how long it took the samples to reach a constant weight. The samples reached a constant weight after approximately 2880 min. The best results for the GSPf sample were due to the greater presence of finely ground pistachios (150 g) and sand, which made the material more compact so that it did not absorb water, as well as the absence of sawdust, which in the other samples contributed to their greater hygroscopicity.

3.3. Thermal Conductivity Measurements

In general, it was noted that all the biobased mix designs reduced the thermal conductivity by over 40% compared to a regular gypsum mortar plaster without biobased aggregates, with lambda values of around 0.5–0.7 W/m·K; the thermal insulation performance was improved, as pistachio shells have a thermal insulating behavior similar to wood. In general, highly improved thermal conductivities were obtained by mixing gypsum and pistachio shells, as all values were in the range of 0.1–0.3 W/m·K, while the tested gypsum mortar without additives had a 0.53 W/m·K thermal conductivity. This range of values is comparable with the thermal conductivity values of some wood panels and insulating bricks or mortars products, as reported by Casaclima [72]. The sample that showed a lower value was GPgPfLfS, composed of pistachio shells and sawdust with a grain size between 4 and 2 mm, which exhibited a seriously lower thermal conductivity of 0.152 W/m·K, which would really make a difference were it not for the fact that its mechanical resistance was also reduced compared to original gypsum plaster.
Even if plasters are applied with a small thickness so their general impact in terms of energy saving is much lower than that of structural and insulating building layers, combining these two materials shows promising prospects in the building sector. The developed mortar is even more interesting when one considers the expected associated low environmental impact thanks to its production under the circular economy paradigm, which could be investigated in further studies.
The results relating to the thermal conductivity tests are summarized in Table 9.

4. Conclusions

Six different mix designs of plaster mortars based on gypsum and ground pistachio shells were comparatively tested, and their performances were evaluated in terms of mechanical resistance, thermal conductivity, imbibition capacity and durability over time. Considering the results obtained from the mechanical tests, it can be stated that almost all the mix designs containing pistachio shells showed an increase in mechanical resistance compared to the mortar without additives, probably due to the characteristic high mechanical resistance and elasticity of the shells.
Moreover, it seems that aging did not cause variations in the mechanical compressive strength of the various mix designs, which maintained good mechanical resistance values: this demonstrates that the thermal stresses induced with aging do not cause loss of material, decohesion or intergranular desegregation, which could have reduced the mechanical performance in terms of compression.
As regards the capillarity absorption tests, the best behavior was shown by the imbibition dynamics of the GSPf sample, which differed from the others in that the absorption curve showed a greater slowness in absorbing water and, compared to all the other samples, an overall lower absorption capacity. These improvement data are very significant as they show that one of the most renowned problems with gypsum-based materials, namely, their high hygroscopicity, can be overcome. From the results obtained, it is possible to state that the best results in terms of mechanical performance and water absorption by capillarity were achieved with the use of pistachio shells with a grain size between 2 and 0.5 mm, in particular, GSPf.
For all the other samples tested, thermal conductivity values between 0.21 and 0.28 W/m·K were measured, confirming that all the biobased mix designs were characterized by a reduction in thermal conductivity, and the thermal insulation performance was also improved compared to the plaster without pistachios grains.
Ultimately, considering all the results obtained, it is possible to say that, on average, the best results were obtained with the use of pistachio shells with a grain size between 0.5 and 2 mm with sand and both with water/gypsum ratios of 0.86 and 0.74.
The research activities carried out demonstrate that the use of waste materials from the agro-food chain not only contributes to circular economy policies but can increase the performance of traditional mortars, reducing the need to use synthetic products and promoting eco-sustainability.
Sandoval et al. [73] reported that biobased materials are increasingly attractive for many applications, including construction, due to their lower cost, abundance, biodegradability and lower related greenhouse gas emissions, but that assessments of their processing costs and efficiency are lacking. To encourage the industrialization phase, further research could enrich this study with analysis of other properties, like durability, fire resistance and sound adsorption, and production chains and costs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: F.F.; Data curation: M.G.I. and R.B.; Formal analysis: F.F., M.G.I. and R.B.; Funding acquisition: M.L.G.; Investigation: F.F., M.G.I., R.B., F.Z. and R.M.; Methodology: F.F., M.G.I. and R.B.; Project administration: F.F. and M.L.G.; Supervision: F.F. and M.L.G.; Validation: F.F., M.G.I. and R.B.; Visualization: M.G.I. and R.B.; Writing—original draft: M.G.I. and R.B.; Writing—review and editing: F.F., M.G.I., R.B., F.Z., R.M. and M.L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research activity has been carried out in the frame of the CUBÂTI project (“Culture du bâti de qualité: Recherche, Innovation et Entreprise pour la Durabilité”), a strategic project for research and innovation in the field of sustainable construction, co-financed by the European Union as part of the Programme de Coopération Transfrontière (CT) Italie-Tunisie 2014–2020, finished in December 2023 [www.cubati.org], accessed on 1 March 2024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data consistent with privacy restrictions are reported in this article.

Acknowledgments

The basic materials were kindly supplied by the following companies: Sicilgesso srl (gypsum); Sicily Confectionery District (pistachio shells).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Monsù Scolaro, A.; Marchi, L.; Corridori, S. Mapping of building cycle waste for scenarios of industrial symbiosis. TECHNE—J. Technol. Archit. Environ. 2021, 22, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cintura, E.; Nunes, L.; Esteves, B.; Faria, P. Agro-industrial wastes as building insulation materials: A review and challenges for Euro-Mediterranean countries. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 171, 113833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bolden, J.; Abu-Lebdeh, T.; Fini, E. Utilization of Recycled and Waste Materials in Various Construction Applications. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 9, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/98/oj (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  5. Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on Waste. Official Journal of the European Union. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/12/oj (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  6. Balletto, G.; Borruso, G.; Mei, G.; Milesi, A. Economia Circolare, Gestione dei Rifiuti da Costruzione e Demolizione e Produzione di Aggregati Riciclati. Il Progetto MEISAR—Un’Applicazione alla Sardegna; EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste: Trieste, Italy, 2020; No. 170; pp. 178–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sundarraj, A.A.; Ranganathan, T.V. A review on cellulose and its utilization from agro-industrial waste. Drug Invent. Today 2018, 10, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tekin, I.D.; Gökçe, H.S. A regional supplementary cementitious material for the cement industry: Pistachio shell ash. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alsalami, Z.H.A. Study the effect of partially replacement. Appl. Adhes. Sci. 2017, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al Karawi, M.Q.; Al-Karawi, R.J.; Borhan, T.M. The Properties of Cement Mortar Reinforced by Pistachio Shells Fibre. Mater. Sci. Forum 2021, 1021, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shafigh, P.; Johnson Alengaram, U.H.; Mahmud, B.; Jumaat, M.Z. Engineering properties of oil palm shell lightweight concrete containing fly ash. Mater. Des. 2013, 49, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Olanipekun, E.A.; Olusola, K.O.; Ata, O. A comparative study of concrete properties using coconut shell and palm kernel shell as coarse aggregates. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Van Dam, E.G.; Van den Oever, M.J.A.; Keijsers, E.R.P. Production process for high density high performance binderless boards from whole coconut husk. Ind. Crops Prod. 2004, 20, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fiorelli, D.D.; Curtolo, N.G.; Barrero, H.S., Jr.; Pallone, E.M.D.J.A.; Johnson, R. Particulate composite based on coconut fiber and castor oil polyurethane. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 40, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghavami, K. Bamboo as reinforcement in structural concrete elements. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, F.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Ma, Y. Mechanical and creep properties of concrete containing Apricot shell lightweight aggregate. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2019, 23, 2948–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nguyen, D.H.; Boutouil, M.; Sebaibi, N.; Baraud, F.; Leleyter, L. Durability of pervious concrete using crushed seashells. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 135, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wei, K.; Lu, C.; Chen, M.; Zhou, X.; Dai, Z.; Shen, D. Development and performance evaluation of a new thermal insulation material from rice straw using high frequency hot-pressing. Energy Build. 2015, 87, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chabannes, E.; Garcia-Diaz, L.; Clerc, J.; Bénézet, C. Studying the hardening and mechanical performances of rice husk and hemp-based building materials cured under natural and accelerated carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 94, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Widyorini, R.; Xu, J.; Umemura, K.; Kawai, S. Manufacture and properties of binderless particleboard from bagasse I: Effects of raw material type, storage methods, and manufacturing process. J. Wood Sci. 2005, 51, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pinto, J.; Sá, A.B.; Pereira, S.; Bentes, I.; Paiva, A. Possible Applications of Corncob as a Raw Insulation, In Insulation Materials in Context of Sustainability; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2016; pp. 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Akinyemi, A.B.; Afolayan, J.; Oluwatobi, E. Some properties of composite corn cob and sawdust particle boards. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tangjuank, S. Thermal insulation and physical properties of particleboards from pineapple leaves. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2011, 6, 4528–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Idicula, A.; Boudenne, L.; Umadevi, L.; Ibos, Y.; Candau, S.T. Thermophysical properties of natural fibre reinforced. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 2719–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ricciardi, P.; Torchia, F.; Belloni, E.; Lascaro, E.; Buratti, C. Environmental characterisation of coffee chaff, a new recycled material for building applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 147, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lachheb, A.; Allouhi, A.; El Marhoune, R.; Saadani, M.; Kousksou, T.; Jamil, A.; Rahmoune, M.; Oussouaddi, O. Thermal insulation improvement in construction materials by adding spent coffee grounds: An experimental and simulation study. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mati-Baouche, N.; De Baynast, H.; Lebert, A.; Sun, S.; Lopez-Mingo, C.J.S.; Leclaire, P.; Michaud, P. Mechanical, thermal and acoustical characterizations of an insulating bio-based. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 58, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Evon, P.; Vinet, J.; Labonne, L.; Rigal, L. Influence of thermo-pressing conditions on the mechanical properties of biodegradable fiberboards made from a deoiled sunflower cake. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 65, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khedari, J.; Charoenvai, S.; Hirunlabh, J. New insulating particleboards from durian peel and coconut coir. Build. Environ. 2003, 38, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Quaranta, N.; Pelozo, G.; Cristóbal, A.; Kawamura, M.; Césari, A. Use of wastes from the peanut industry in the manufacture of building materials. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2018, 13, 662–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lamrani, M.; Laaroussi, N.; Khabbazi, A.; Khalfaoui, M.; Garoum, M.; Feiz, A. Experimental study of thermal properties of a new ecological building material based on peanut shells and plaster. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2017, 7, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Da Silva, C.F.; Stefanowski, B.; Maskell, D.; Ormondroyd, G.; Ansell, M.; Dengel, A.; Ball, R. Improvement of indoor air quality by MDF panels containing walnut shells. Build. Environ. 2017, 123, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Vecchi, A.; Colajanni, S. Isolamento termico: Dal riciclo all’innovazione. In Colloqui.AT.e 2016: MATER(i)A. Materials, Architetcture, Tecnology, Energy/Environment, Reuse (Interdisciplinary), Adaptability; Gangemi: Roma, Italy, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsampali, E.; Ioanna, V.; Stefanidou, M. Effect of hemp fibers and crystalline admixtures on the properties and self-healing efficiency of lime and clay-based mortars. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 86, 108963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mahpour, A.R.; Ardanuy, M.; Ventura, H.; Rosell, J.R.; Claramunt, J. Mechanical properties and durability of biobased fabric-reinforced lime composites intended for strengthening historical masonry structures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 414, 134916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Le, D.L.; Salomone, R.; Quan, T.; Nguyen, Q.T. Circular bio-based building materials: A literature review of case studies and sustainability assessment methods. Build. Environ. 2023, 244, 110774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chabriac, P.A.; Gourdon, E.; Glé, P.; Fabbri, A.; Lenormand, H. Agricultural by-products for building insulation: Acoustical characterization and modeling to predict micro-structural parameters. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 112, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, F.; Yu, Q.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Long-term performance of bio-based miscanthus mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 324, 126703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Affan, H.; Arairo, W.; Arayr, J. Mechanical and thermal characterization of bio-sourced mortars made from agricultural and industrial by-products. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 18, e01939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, F.; Yu, Q.; Liu, C. Durability of thermal insulating bio-based lightweight concrete: Understanding of heat treatment on bio-aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 269, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pani, L.; Francesconi, L.; Rombi, J.; Naitza, S.; Balletto, G. Recycled Aggregates Mechanical properties and environmental sustainability. In INPUT Academy; Federico II Open Access University Press: Cagliari, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pani, L.; Francesconi, L.; Concu, G. Relation between Static and Dynamic Moduli of Elasticity for Recycled Aggregate Concrete. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Concrete Sustainability, Tokyo, Japan, 17–29 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pani, L.; Francesconi, L.; Concu, G. Influence of replacement percentage of recycled aggregates on recycled aggregate concrete properties. In Proceedings of the FIB Symposium Concrete Engineering for Excellence and Efficiency, Prague, Czech Republic, 8–10 June 2011; pp. 1245–1248. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pani, L.; Francesconi, L.; Valdes, M. Caratteristiche allo stato fresco ed indurito di calcestruzzi strutturali confezionati con aggregati riciclati. In Proceedings of the 18° Congresso CTE, Brescia, Italy, 11–13 November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Germanà, M.L.; Kharrat, F. Circular building production in the South Mediterranean area: The experience of CUBÂTI Project. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Getting to Zero. Beyond Energy Transition towards Carbon-Neutral Mediterranean Cities”, Firenze, Italy, 14–16 February 2024. [Google Scholar]
  46. Campisi, M.T. Tecnologia del gesso nell’edilizia storica nella Sicilia centrale. In Proceedings of the VI Congresso Internazionale ReUSO, Messina, Italy, 11–13 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
  47. Billeci, B. L’impiego del gesso nell’architettura storica siciliana. In Tempo, Materia, Architettura; Edizione Lussografica: Caltanisetta, Italy, 1997; pp. 28–42. [Google Scholar]
  48. Imbornone, P. Elementi Costruttivi in Gesso, Repertorio di Antichi Magisteri; Dario Flaccovio Editore: Palermo, Italy, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  49. Montana, G.; Polito, A.M.; Randazzo, L. Studio etnoarcheometrico di malte aeree e legante gessoso nell’area delle Madonie (Sicilia Settentrionale). In Proceedings of the VI Congresso Nazionale di Archeometria, Scienza e Beni Culturali, Pavia, Italy, 15–18 February 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mamì, A. Gypsum and giant canes in the Sicilian traditional architecture. In Vernacular Architecture: Towards a Sustainable Future; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2014; pp. 455–460. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/99458 (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  51. Vavřínová, N.; Stejskalová, K.; Teslík, J.; Kubenková, K.; Majer, J. Research of Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Composite Material Based on Gypsum and Straw. J. Renew. Mater. 2022, 10, 1859–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jia, R.; Wang, Q.; Feng, P. A comprehensive overview of fibre-reinforced gypsum-based composites (FRGCs) in the construction field. Compos. Part B 2021, 205, 108540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. UNI EN 13279-2:2014; Leganti e Intonaci a Base di Gesso—Parte 2: Metodi di Prov. Ente Italiano di Normazione UNI: Milano, Italy, 2014.
  54. Istituto Centrale per il Restauro. Dimos-Parte 1-Modulo 1, Corso Sulla Manutenzione di Dipinti Murali—Mosaici—Stucchi, Tecniche di Esecuzione Materiali Costruttivi; Comas Grafica: Roma, Italy, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  55. Turco, A. Il Gesso Lavorazione—Trasformazione—Impieghi, 2nd ed.; HOEPLI: Milano, Italy, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  56. UNI EN 13279-1:2008; Leganti e Intonaci a Base di Gesso—Parte 1: Definizioni e Requisiti. Ente Italiano di Normazione UNI: Milano, Italy, 2008.
  57. FAO Statistics. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/ (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  58. Istat Statistics. Available online: http://dati.istat.it/ (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  59. Taghizadeh, A.; Rad-Moghadam, K. Green fabrication of Cu/pistachio shell nanocomposite using Pistacia Vera L. hull: An efficient catalyst for expedient reduction of 4-nitrophenol and organic dyes. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 1105–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kazankaya, A.; Balta, F.; Ozturk, N.; Sonmez, F. Mineral composition of pistachio (pistaciavera) from Siirt. Asian J. Chem. 2008, 20, 2337–2343. [Google Scholar]
  61. Putun, E.; Ozbay, N.; Varol, E.A.; Uzun, B.B.; Ates, F. Rapid and slow pyrolysis of pistachio shell: Effect of pyrolysis conditions on the product yields and characterization of the liquid product. Int. J. Energy Res. 2006, 31, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Avenell, S.; Sainz-Diaz, C.I.; Griffiths, A.J. Solid waste pyrolysis in a pilotscale batch pyrolizer. Fuel 1996, 75, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. UNI 10859:2000; Beni Culturali—Materiali Lapidei Naturali ed Artificiali—Determinazione Dell’assorbimento D’acqua per Capillarità. Ente Italiano di Normazione UNI: Milano, Italy, 2000.
  64. CNR BU n. 137/92; Norme Sugli Aggregati—Determinazione del Coefficiente di Imbibizione. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR: Roma, Italy, 1992.
  65. Kušnerová, M.; Valíček, J.; Harničárová, M.; Hryniewicz, T.; Rokosz, K.; Palková, Z.; Václavík, V.; Řepka, M.; Bendová, M. A Proposal for Simplifying the Method of Evaluation of Uncertainties in Measurement Results. Meas. Sci. Rev. 2013, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shi, J.; Tan, J.; Liu, B.; Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Xiong, T.; Shib, J. Thermal and mechanical properties of thermal energy storage lightweight aggregate mortar incorporated with phase change material. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shi, J.; Liu, B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, E.; He, Z.; Xu, H.; Ren, X. Preparation and characterization of lightweight aggregate foamed geopolymer concretes aerated using hydrogen peroxide. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 256, 119442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Czajkowski, L.; Kocewicz, R.; Weres, J.; Olek, W. Estimation of Thermal Properties of Straw-Based Insulating Panels. Materials 2022, 15, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Miličić, M.; Folić, R.J.; Prokić, A.D.; Čeh, A.A. Model for the analysis of thermal conductivity of composite material of natural origin. Therm. Sci. 2019, 23, 3513–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. UNI EN 1015-18:2004; Metodi di Prova per Malte per Opere Murarie—Determinazione del Coefficiente di Assorbimento D’acqua per Capillarità Della Malta Indurita. Ente Italiano di Normazione UNI: Milano, Italy, 2004.
  71. UNI ISO 9869-1:2015; Isolamento Termico—Elementi per L’edilizia—Misurazione in situ Della Resistenza Termica e Della Trasmittanza Termica—Parte 1: Metodo del Termoflussimetro. Ente Italiano di Normazione UNI: Milano, Italy, 2015.
  72. Casaclima. Conduttività Termica di Materiali da Costruzione; Agenzia provinciale per la protezione dell’ambiente e la tutela del lavoro: Bolzano, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  73. Salazar Sandoval, S.; Amenábar, A.; Toledo, I.; Silva, N.; Contreras, P. Advances in the Sustainable Development of Biobased Materials Using Plant and Animal Waste as Raw Materials: A Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Record cards: (a) aggregates; (b) mix designs.
Figure 1. Record cards: (a) aggregates; (b) mix designs.
Sustainability 16 03695 g001
Figure 2. Pistachio shell grain sizes: (a) Pg shells with dimensions ranging from 2 to 4 mm; (b) Pf shells with dimensions of 0.5–2 mm; (c) Ps shells with dimensions <0.5 mm. Figures report the metric reference to 1 cm.
Figure 2. Pistachio shell grain sizes: (a) Pg shells with dimensions ranging from 2 to 4 mm; (b) Pf shells with dimensions of 0.5–2 mm; (c) Ps shells with dimensions <0.5 mm. Figures report the metric reference to 1 cm.
Sustainability 16 03695 g002
Figure 3. Example of samples made for testing: (a) GPsPg; (b) GPgPfLfS; (c) GSPf; (d) GPsLfS.2.
Figure 3. Example of samples made for testing: (a) GPsPg; (b) GPgPfLfS; (c) GSPf; (d) GPsLfS.2.
Sustainability 16 03695 g003
Figure 4. Examples of mortars spread on tiles: (a) GPsPg; (b) GSPf; (c) GPsLfS.2. Figures report the metric reference to 1 cm.
Figure 4. Examples of mortars spread on tiles: (a) GPsPg; (b) GSPf; (c) GPsLfS.2. Figures report the metric reference to 1 cm.
Sustainability 16 03695 g004
Figure 5. Example of a flexion test: (a) photo before running the test; (b) photo after running the test.
Figure 5. Example of a flexion test: (a) photo before running the test; (b) photo after running the test.
Sustainability 16 03695 g005
Figure 6. Water absorption test by capillarity.
Figure 6. Water absorption test by capillarity.
Sustainability 16 03695 g006
Figure 7. ISOMET 2114 thermofluximeter in operation.
Figure 7. ISOMET 2114 thermofluximeter in operation.
Sustainability 16 03695 g007
Figure 8. Thermo-hygrometric stress.
Figure 8. Thermo-hygrometric stress.
Sustainability 16 03695 g008
Figure 9. Absorption curves.
Figure 9. Absorption curves.
Sustainability 16 03695 g009
Figure 10. Desorption curves.
Figure 10. Desorption curves.
Sustainability 16 03695 g010
Table 1. Technical data sheet characteristics of the wall gypsum.
Table 1. Technical data sheet characteristics of the wall gypsum.
Technical Features
AppearanceWhite powder
Powder specific gravity≈650 kg/m3
Granulometry≤0.3 mm
pH≈7
ConsumptionVariable, depending on use
Seizing time≈7 min
Workability time≈6 min
Drying time≈8 days
Insulation from direct airborne noiseNPD
Heat resistanceNPD
Fire resistanceClass A1
Mixing water≈50% (≈16.5 l per 25 kg)
Legend: NPD: no performance declared. Data expressed at 22 + 1 °C with relative humidity at 50 + 5%. Lower temperatures lengthen maturation and hardening times; higher temperatures reduce maturation and hardening times.
Table 2. List of samples made with their relative dimensions and the tests carried out on each of them.
Table 2. List of samples made with their relative dimensions and the tests carried out on each of them.
SampleDimensionTest Type
GPsPg16 × 4 × 4Mechanical and water absorption tests
10 × 10 × 0.5Adhesion tests
4 × 4 × 4Mechanical compression and water absorption tests
20 × 20 × 2Thermal conductivity tests
GPgPfLfS16 × 4 × 4Mechanical and water absorption tests
10 × 10 × 0.5Adhesion tests
4 × 4 × 4Mechanical compression and water absorption tests
20 × 20 × 2Thermal conductivity tests
GSPf16 × 4 × 4Mechanical and water absorption tests
10 × 10 × 0.5Adhesion tests
4 × 4 × 4Mechanical compression and water absorption tests
20 × 20 × 2Thermal conductivity tests
GSPf.216 × 4 × 4Mechanical and water absorption tests
10 × 10 × 0.5Adhesion tests
4 × 4 × 4Mechanical compression and water absorption tests
20 × 20 × 2Thermal conductivity tests
GPsLfS.216 × 4 × 4Mechanical and water absorption tests
10 × 10 × 0.5Adhesion tests
4 × 4 × 4Mechanical compression and water absorption tests
20 × 20 × 2Thermal conductivity tests
GPsLfS.316 × 4 × 4Mechanical and water absorption tests
10 × 10 × 0.5Adhesion tests
4 × 4 × 4Mechanical compression and water absorption tests
20 × 20 × 2Thermal conductivity tests
Legend: G: gypsum; S: sand; Pg: large pistachio shells; Pf: medium pistachio shells; Ps: fine pistachio shells; Lf: sawdust.
Table 3. Compositions of the created mix designs.
Table 3. Compositions of the created mix designs.
Mix DesignCompositionWeight [g]
GSGypsum (G)940
Sand (S)60
Water700
GLfGypsum (G)925
Sawdust (Lf)75
Water700
GLf.2Gypsum (G)800
Sawdust (Lf)200
Water700
GSLfGypsum (G)800
Sand (S)150
Sawdust (Lf)75
Water700
GSLf.2Gypsum (G)800
Sand (S)50
Sawdust (Lf)150
Water700
GPsPgGypsum (G)600
Pistachio shells (Pg) (2–4 mm)260
Pistachio shells (Ps) (<0.5 mm)140
Water 500
GPgPfLfSGypsum (G)700
Pistachio shells (Pg) (2–4 mm)80
Pistachio shells (Pf) (0.5–2 mm)80
Sawdust (Lf) (<0.5 mm)80
Sand (0.075–0.6 mm)60
Water600
GSPfGypsum (G)800
Pistachio shells (Pf) (0.5–2 mm)150
Sand (S) (0.075–0.6 mm)50
Water700
GSPf.2Gypsum (G)941
Pistachio shells (Pf) (0.5–2 mm)94
Sand (S) (0.075–0.6 mm)59
Water700
GPsLfS.2Gypsum800
Pistachio shells (Ps) (<0.5 mm)75
Sawdust (Lf) (<0.5 mm)75
Sand (S) (0.075–0.6 mm)50
Water700
GPsLfS.3Gypsum (G)790
Pistachio shells (Ps) (<0.5 mm)75
Sawdust (Lf) (<0.5 mm)75
Sand (S) (0.075–0.6 mm)60
Water700
Table 4. Exposure to high-humidity conditions.
Table 4. Exposure to high-humidity conditions.
Humid ConditionsTimeDrying of Samples
90%
Salt spray/humidity
cabinet, 100 lt
7 daysDrying in the oven at 40 °C for 2 days
90%
Salt spray/humidity
cabinet, 100 lt
7 daysPlaced in the freezer at −20 °C for 2 days and subsequently dried in the oven at 40 °C for 2 days
Table 5. List of adopted methods and instruments.
Table 5. List of adopted methods and instruments.
Procedure MethodInstrumentReference
Realization of samplesPortable High-Speed Grinder, 220 V–2.5 kW–36,000 rpm, Matest SpA, Treviolo, ItalyNone
Shake table methodShake table Matest Ref. E090-05/BZ/0035, Matest SpA, Treviolo, ItalyUNI EN 13279-2:2014 [53]
Testing MethodInstrumentReference
Compressive and flexion strength testsControls–Model 65-L0019/8UNI EN 13279-2:2014 [53]
Water absorption/desorption testMeasurement of the change in mass of the mortar sampleUNI EN 1015-18:2004 [63,70]
Thermal conductivity measurementISOMET 2114 thermofluximeter, Applied Precision s.r.o., Bratislava, SlovakiaUNI ISO 9869-1:2015 [71]
Aging testSalt spray/humidity cabinet, 100 lt; Ref. C & W Specialist Equipment Ltd. SF/AB100767796, Specialist Equipment Solutions Ltd., Aberdeen, UKNone
Table 6. Results of mechanical tests before aging.
Table 6. Results of mechanical tests before aging.
Mix DesignWater/Gypsum RatioCompression Test
KNMPa
GS0.744.952.56
GLf0.876.804.24
GLf.20.871.811.13
GSLf0.875.483.42
GSLf.20.873.452.16
GPsPg0.833.272.04
GPgPfLfS0.862.301.44
GSPf0.756.604.14
GSPf.20.7410.756.69
GPsLfS.20.886.634.13
GPsLfS.30.897.784.86
Table 7. Results of mechanical tests after aging.
Table 7. Results of mechanical tests after aging.
Mix DesignWater/Gypsum RatioCompression Test
after Oven
Compression Test
after Freezer
KNMPaKNMPa
GS0.744.802.504.652.40
GLf0.876.704.206.553.94
GLf.20.871.741.101.580.81
GSLf0.875.433.355.242.83
GSLf.20.873.412.123.141.87
GPgPfLfS0.862.201.402.041.27
GSPf0.757.224.517.034.39
GSPf.20.7410.956.8110.76.4
GPsLfS.20.886.884.296.624.10
GPsLfS.30.896.884.297.744.84
Table 8. Imbibition coefficient values for the various samples tested.
Table 8. Imbibition coefficient values for the various samples tested.
Mix DesignImbibition Coefficient
GS45.54
GLf48.42
GLf.280.80
GSLf50.17
GSLf.261.11
GPgPfLfS41.93
GSPf44.09
GSPf.244.01
GPsLfS.248.72
GPsLfS.351.93
Table 9. Average thermal conductivity values for the various samples tested.
Table 9. Average thermal conductivity values for the various samples tested.
Mix DesignAverage Thermal Conductivity
[W/m·K]
GS0.531
GLf0.106
GLf.20.110
GSLf0.191
GSLf.20.156
GPgPfLfS0.152
GSPf0.231
GSPf.20.277
GPsLfS.20.223
GPsLfS.30.214
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandez, F.; Insinga, M.G.; Basile, R.; Zagarella, F.; Montagno, R.; Germanà, M.L. Comparative Evaluation of Gypsum-Based Plasters with Pistachio Shells for Eco-Sustainable Building. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093695

AMA Style

Fernandez F, Insinga MG, Basile R, Zagarella F, Montagno R, Germanà ML. Comparative Evaluation of Gypsum-Based Plasters with Pistachio Shells for Eco-Sustainable Building. Sustainability. 2024; 16(9):3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093695

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandez, Federica, Maria Grazia Insinga, Roberta Basile, Federica Zagarella, Roberta Montagno, and Maria Luisa Germanà. 2024. "Comparative Evaluation of Gypsum-Based Plasters with Pistachio Shells for Eco-Sustainable Building" Sustainability 16, no. 9: 3695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093695

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop