Glacies

As 2026 began, it was the middle of winter in much of the northern hemisphere [...]

Understanding short-term glacier motion is vital for assessing ice sheet dynamics in a warming climate. This study investigates the tidal and diurnal influences on the flow of Helheim Glacier, one of Greenland’s fastest-flowing marine-terminating glaciers, using data from 18 high-frequency GPS sensors and a regional tide gauge collected during summer 2013. A Kalman filter was applied to separate and quantify glacier velocity, tidal admittance, and diurnal melt-driven acceleration. Results reveal a high level of tidal admittance affecting the horizontal flow speed of the glacier, especially at the centre of the glacier, which is propagated upstream. This admittance corresponds to a 0.38–0.68 m/day reduction from the mean at high spring tide and a comparable increase at low tide. The glacier’s vertical motion showed strong tidal control close to the terminus, of 0.6–1.05 m during high spring tides, but this was significantly reduced more than 1 km from the terminus. Diurnal variations in horizontal speed are less spatially and temporally variable, with most nodes experiencing changes from a mean speed of ±0.1–0.3 m/day. These findings demonstrate that both tidal forcing and meltwater input to the basal system exert a significant, and potentially spatially variable, control on glacier dynamics, highlighting the need to incorporate short-period external forcing into predictive models of marine-terminating glacier behaviour.

Convection associated with the leading mode of subseasonal variability of the tropical atmosphere, the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO), can excite Rossby wave trains that extend well into the extratropics and allow the MJO to modulate many components of the Earth system. To improve our understanding of teleconnections between the MJO and Antarctic sea ice, composite anomalies of daily change in sea ice concentration (ΔSIC) from 1989 to 2019 were binned by phase 0–20 days after an active MJO and compared to anomalies of surface air temperature, the meridional component of surface wind, and sea-level pressure. In May, ΔSIC anomalies were strongest in the Indian Ocean (IO) sector, 16 days after phase 8. There, a wavenumber-three pattern in sea-level pressure anomalies associated with the MJO resulted in anomalously poleward winds and warmer temperatures over the central and eastern IO that were collocated with anomalously negative ΔSIC. Furthermore, anomalously equatorward winds and colder temperatures in the western IO were collocated with anomalously positive ΔSIC. In July, ΔSIC anomalies were strongest in the Weddell Sea (WS) sector nine days after an active MJO in phase 2. There, a wavenumber-three pattern in sea-level pressure anomalies resulted in anomalously poleward winds and warmer temperatures over the western and central WS that were collocated with negative ΔSIC anomalies; anomalously equatorward winds and colder temperatures over the eastern WS were collocated with positive ΔSIC anomalies. In September, the largest ΔSIC anomalies were observed in the IO and WS sectors six days after an active MJO in phase 8. No meaningful modulation of sea ice anomalies was found after an active MJO in November or January. These results extend our understanding of teleconnections between the MJO and Antarctic sea ice on the subseasonal time scale.