Microbial Insights into Biofortified Common Bean Cultivation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Rhizosphere
3. Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria
4. Biofortification of Common Beans
5. Metabolic Potential
6. Biological Nitrogen Fixation
7. Improvement of Soil Structure
8. Symbiotic Interactions
9. Nutrient Recycling
10. Biofertilizers for Disease Control
11. Biocontrol Agents
12. Conclusions
13. Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Karavidas, I.; Ntatsi, G.; Vougeleka, V.; Karkanis, A.; Ntanasi, T.; Saitanis, C.; Agathokleous, E.; Ropokis, A.; Sabatino, L.; Tran, F.; et al. Agronomic Practices to Increase the Yield and Quality of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): A Systematic Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.; Matson, P.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002, 418, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Cui, Z.; Fan, M.; Zhang, W.; Chen, X.; Jiang, R. Integrated soil-crop system management: Reducing environmental risk while increasing crop productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. J. Environ. Qual. 2011, 40, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khatoon, Z.; Huang, S.; Rafique, M.; Fakhar, A.; Kamran, M.A.; Santoyo, G. Unlocking the potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on soil health and the sustainability of agricultural systems. J. Environ. Man. 2020, 273, 111118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Lu, T.; Qian, H. Pesticide interference and additional effects on plant microbiomes. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 888, 164149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, A.; Nazari, M.; Antar, M.; Msimbira, L.A.; Naamala, J.; Lyu, D.; Rabileh, M.; Zajonc, J.; Smith, D.L. PGPR in Agriculture: A Sustainable Approach to Increasing Climate Change Resilience. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 667546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saltzman, A.; Birol, E.; Bouis, H.; Boy, E.; Moura, F.; Islam, Y.; Pfeiffer, W. Biofortification: Progress toward a more nourishing future. Glob. Food Secur. 2013, 2, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, M.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, S.; Kapoor, P.; Kumar, A.; Chunduri, V.; Arora, P. Biofortified crops generated by breeding, agronomy, and transgenic approaches are improving lives of millions of people around the world. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, A.B.; Warkentin, T.D. Biofortification of pulse crops: Status and future perspectives. Plants 2020, 9, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marques, E.; Darby, H.M.; Kraft, J. Benefits and limitations of non-transgenic micronutrient biofortification approaches. Agronomy 2021, 11, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, I.; Seo, Y.S.; Mannaa, M. Recruitment of the rhizo-microbiome army: Assembly determinants and engineering of the rhizosphere microbiome as a key to unlocking plant potential. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1163832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hartmann, M.; Six, J. Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Cheng, L.; Nian, H.; Jin, J.; Lian, T. Linking plant functional genes to rhizosphere microbes: A review. Plant Biotech. J. 2023, 21, 902–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nielsen, K.M.; Van Elsas, J.D. Stimulatory effects of compounds present in the rhizosphere on natural transformation of Acinetobacter sp. BD413 with cell lysates in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bais, H.P.; Park, S.W.; Weir, T.L.; Callaway, R.M.; Vivanco, J.M. How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, P.; Vibhandik, R.; Agrahari, R.; Daverey, A.; Rani, R. Role of Root Exudates on the Soil Microbial Diversity and Biogeochemistry of Heavy Metals. Appl. Biochem. Biotechn. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.H.; Crowley, D.E. Rhizosphere microbial community structure in relation to root location and plant iron nutritional status. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, C.; Singh, B.K.; He, J.Z.; Han, Y.L.; Li, P.P.; Wan, L.H.; Meng, G.Z.; Liu, S.Y.; Wang, J.T.; Wu, C.F.; et al. Plant developmental stage drives the differentiation in ecological role of the maize microbiome. Microbiome 2021, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grobelak, A.; Kokot, P.; Hutchison, D.; Grosser, A.; Kacprzak, M. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as an alternative to mineral fertilizers in assisted bioremediation—Sustainable land and waste management. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 227, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bitas, V.; Kim, H.S.; Bennett, J.W.; Kang, S. Sniffing on microbes: Diverse roles of microbial volatile organic compounds in plant health. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlot, A.C.; Rosenkranz, M. Volatile compounds—The language of all kingdoms? J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mhlongo, M.I.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A. Profiling of Volatile Organic Compounds from Four Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria by SPME–GC–MS: A Metabolomics Study. Metabolites 2022, 12, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, N.; Bano, A. Rhizobacteria and Abiotic Stress Management. In Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Stress Management; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naseem, H.; Bano, A. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their exopolysaccharide in drought tolerance of maize. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, J.; Li, M.J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, M.Q.; Wang, J. ChIP-Array: Combinatory analysis of ChIP-seq/chip and microarray gene expression data to discover direct/indirect targets of a transcription factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanchiswamy, C.N.; Malnoy, M.; Maffei, M. Chemical diversity of microbial volatiles and their potential for plant growth and productivity. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yergeau, E.; Sanschagrin, S.; Maynard, C.; St-Arnaud, M.; Greer, C.W. Microbial expression profiles in the rhizosphere of willows depend on soil contamination. ISME J. 2014, 8, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diaz, S.; Polania, J.; Ariza-Suarez, D.; Cajiao, C.; Grajales, M.; Raatz, B.; Beebe, S.E. Genetic Correlation Between Fe and Zn Biofortification and Yield Components in a Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 739033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camaschella, C. Iron deficiency. Blood 2019, 133, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finkelstein, J.L.; Haas, J.D.; Mehta, S. Iron-biofortified staple food crops for improving iron status: A review of the current evidence. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welch, R.M.; House, W.A.; Beebe, S.; Cheng, Z. Genetic selection for enhanced bioavailable levels of iron in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3576–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tako, E.; Laparra, J.M.; Glahn, R.P.; Welch, R.M.; Lei, X.G.; Beebe, S.; Miller, D.D. Biofortified black beans in a maize and bean diet provide more bioavailable iron to piglets than standard black beans. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tako, E.; Beebe, S.E.; Reed, S.; Hart, J.J.; Glahn, R.P. Polyphenolic compounds appear to limit the nutritional benefit of biofortified higher iron black bean. Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haas, J.D.; Luna, S.V.; Lung’aho, M.G.; Wenger, M.J.; Murray-Kolb, L.E.; Beebe, S.; Gahutu, J.B.; Egli, I.M. Consuming iron biofortified beans increases iron status in Rwandan women after 128 days in a randomized controlled feeding trial. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 1586–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murray-Kolb, L.E.; Wenger, M.J.; Scott, S.P.; Rhoten, S.E.; Lung’aho, M.G.; Haas, J.D. Consumption of iron-biofortified beans positively affects cognitive performance in 18- to 27-year-old Rwandan female college students in an 18-week randomized controlled efficacy trial. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 2109–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luna, S.V.; Pompano, L.M.; Lung’aho, M.; Gahutu, J.B.; Haas, J.D. Increased iron status during a feeding trial of iron-biofortified beans increases physical work efficiency in Rwandan women. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wenger, M.J.; Rhoten, S.E.; Murray-Kolb, L.E.; Scott, S.P.; Boy, E.; Gahutu, J.B.; Haas, J.D. Changes in iron status are related to changes in brain activity and behavior in Rwandan female university students: Results from a randomized controlled efficacy trial involving iron-biofortified beans. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Del Peloso, M.J.; Melo, L.C.; Faria, L.C.; Costa, J.G.C.; Rava, C.A.; Carneiro, G.E.S.; Soares, D.M.; Díaz, J.L.C.; Abreu, A.F.B.; Faria, J.C.; et al. BRS Pontal: New common bean cultivar with Carioca grain type. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2004, 4, 369–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aketi, R.; Sharma, S.K.; Sharma, M.P.; Namrata, Y.; Joshi, O.P. Inoculation of zinc solubilizing Bacillus aryabhattai strains for improved growth, mobilization and biofortification of zinc in soybean and wheat cultivated in vertisols of central India. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014, 73, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, A.M.; da Silva, C.V.F.; Albano, R.M.; Padua, V.L.M. Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of biofortified BRS pontal and conventional carioca bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parks, D.H.; Tyson, G.W.; Hugenholtz, P.; Beiko, R.G. STAMP: Statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 3123–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Tu, C.; Hoyt, G.G.; DeForest, J.L.; Hu, S. Long-term no-tillage and organic input management enhanced the diversity and stability of soil microbial community. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teufel, R.; Mascaraque, V.; Ismail, W.; Voss, M.; Perera, J.; Eisenreich, W.; Haehnel, W.; Fuchs, G. Bacterial phenylalanine and phenylacetate catabolic pathway revealed. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 14390–14395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, S.; Dickschat, J.S. Bacterial volatiles: The smell of small organisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 814–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sugawara, S.; Mashiguchi, K.; Tanaka, K.; Hishiyama, S.; Sakai, T.; Hanada, K.; Kinoshita-Tsujimura, K.; Yu, H.; Dai, X.; Takebayashi, Y.; et al. Distinct Characteristics of Indole-3-Acetic Acid and Phenylacetic Acid, Two Common Auxins in Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1641–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.J.; Huang, J.W.; Deng, W.L. Phenylacetic Acid and Methylphenyl Acetate From the Biocontrol Bacterium Bacillus mycoides BM02 Suppress Spore Germination in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 569263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lemfack, M.C.; Gohlke, B.O.; Toguem, S.M.T.; Preissner, S.; Piechulla, B.; Preissner, R. mVOC 2.0: A database of microbial volatiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 1261–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stahl, P.D.; Parkin, T.B. Microbial production of volatile organic compounds in soil microcosms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1996, 60, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leff, J.W.; Fierer, N. Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from soil and litter samples. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1629–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McBride, S.G.; Choudoir, M.J.; Fierer, N.; Strickland, M.S. Volatile organic compounds from leaf litter decomposition alter soil microbial communities and carbon dynamics. Ecology 2020, 101, e03130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penuelas, J.; Asensio, D.; Tholl, D.; Wenke, K.; Rosenkranz, M.; Piechulla, B.; Schnitzler, J.P. Biogenic volatile emissions from the soil. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1866–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Groenhagen, U.; Baumgartner, R.; Bailly, A.; Gardiner, A.; Eberl, L.; Schulz, S.; Weisskopf, L. Production of bioactive volatiles by different Burkholderia ambifaria strains. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 892–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blom, D.; Fabbri, C.; Connor, E.C.; Schiestl, F.P.; Klauser, D.R.; Boller, T.; Eberl, L.; Weisskopf, L. Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 3047–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velázquez-Becerra, C.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.I.; López-Bucio, J.; Altamirano-Hernández, J.; Flores-Cortez, I.; Valencia-Cantero, E.A. Volatile organic compound analysis from Arthrobacter agilis identifies dimethylhexadecylamine, an amino-containing lipid modulating bacterial growth and Medicago sativa morphogenesis in vitro. Plant Soil 2011, 339, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montejano-Ramírez, V.; García-Pineda, E.; Valencia-Cantero, E. Bacterial Compound N,N-Dimethylhexadecylamine Modulates Expression of Iron Deficiency and Defense Response Genes in Medicago truncatula Independently of the Jasmonic Acid Pathway. Plants 2020, 9, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Real-Sosa, K.M.; Hernández-Calderón, E.; Flores-Cortez, I.; Valencia-Cantero, E. Bacteria-derived N,N-dimethylhexadecylamine modulates the endophytic microbiome of Medicago truncatula in vitro. Rhizosphere 2022, 21, 100470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, K.L.; Kour, D.; Kaur, T.; Negi, R.; Devi, R.; Yadav, N.; Rai, P.K.; Singh, S.; Rai, A.K.; Yadav, A.; et al. Endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria: Untapped treasurer for agricultural sustainability. J. Appl. Biol. Biotech. 2023, 11, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bruijn, F.J.; Hungria, M. Biological Nitrogen Fixation. In Good Microbes in Medicine, Food Production, Biotechnology, Bioremediation, and Agriculture; de Bruijn, F.J., Smidt, L.S., Cocolin, M., Sauer, D.D., Thomashow, L., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franche, C.; Lindström, K.; Elmerich, C. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with leguminous and non-leguminous plants. Plant Soil 2009, 321, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niewiadomska, A.; Przygocka-Cyna, K. Nitrogen Hotspots on the Farm—A Practice-Oriented Approach. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maitra, S.; Praharaj, S.; Brestic, M.; Sahoo, R.K.; Sagar, L.; Shankar, T.; Palai, J.B.; Sahoo, U.; Sairam, M.; Pramanick, B.; et al. Rhizobium as Biotechnological Tools for Green Solutions: An Environment-Friendly Approach for Sustainable Crop Production in the Modern Era of Climate Change. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 80, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aschi, A.; Riah-Anglet, W.; Recous, S.; Bailleu, C.; Aubert, M.; Trinsoutrot-Gattin, I. Do Conservative Agricultural Practices Improve the Functional Biological State of Legume-Based Cropping Systems? Agriculture 2023, 13, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahab, A.; Muhammad, M.; Munir, A.; Abdi, G.; Zaman, W.; Ayaz, A.; Khizar, C.; Reddy, S.P.P. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Regulating Growth, Enhancing Productivity, and Potentially Influencing Ecosystems under Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Plants 2023, 12, 3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- do Antonucci, B.V.; Lescano, L.E.A.M.; Lameu, N.D.; Rodrigues, D.R.; de França, E.J.G.; Matsumoto, L.S.; de Souza Poletto, R. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi provides enhanced development and reduced mite incidence in Phaseolus vulgaris L. by direct root colonization and via the common mycorrhizal network. Observ. Econ. Lat. Am. 2023, 21, 268–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellequin, E.; Monard, C.; Quaiser, A.; Henriot, M.; Klarzynski, O.; Binet, F. Specific recruitment of soil bacteria and fungi decomposers following a biostimulant application increased crop residues mineralization. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goyal, R.K.; Habtewold, J.Z. Evaluation of Legume–Rhizobial Symbiotic Interactions Beyond Nitrogen Fixation That Help the Host Survival and Diversification in Hostile Environments. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tinker, P.B. The role of microorganisms in mediating and facilitating the uptake of plant nutrients from soil. In Biological Processes and Soil Fertility. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences; Tinsley, J., Darbyshire, J.F., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1984; Volume 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoak, D.; Isaac, L.; Gordon, M. Climate Change, Food Security, and Health: Harnessing Agroecology to Build Climate-Resilient Communities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamdad, H.; Papari, S.; Lazarovits, G.; Berruti, F. Soil amendments for sustainable agriculture: Microbial organic fertilizers. Soil Use Manag. 2022, 38, 94–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasar, S.; Shaheen, H.; Murtaza, G.; Tinghong, T.; Arfan, M.; Idrees, M. Socioeconomic Evaluation of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivation in Providing Sustainable Livelihood to the Mountain Populations of Kashmir Himalayas. Plants 2023, 12, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abán, C.L.; Larama, G.; Ducci, A.; Huidobro, J.; Abanto, M.; Vargas-Gil, S.; Pérez-Brandan, C. Soil Properties and Bacterial Communities Associated with the Rhizosphere of the Common Bean after Using Brachiaria brizantha as a Service Crop: A 10-Year Field Experiment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Yang, J.; Wei, G.; Shen, L.; Ding, W.; Chen, S. Biofertilizers regulate the soil microbial community and enhance Panax ginseng yields. Chin. Med. 2019, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, C.; Li, R.; Xiong, W.; Shen, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, B.; Ruan, Y.; Geisen, S.; Shen, Q.; Kowalchuk, G.A. Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression. Microbiome 2020, 8, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chaudhary, P.; Singh, S.; Chaudhary, A.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, G. Overview of biofertilizers in crop production and stress management for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 930340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ptaszek, M.; Canfora, L.; Pugliese, M.; Pinzari, F.; Gilardi, G.; Trzciński, P.; Malusà, E. Microbial-Based Products to Control Soil-Borne Pathogens: Methods to Improve Efficacy and to Assess Impacts on Microbiome. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Shi, Z.; Zhu, J.; Cao, A.; Fang, W.; Yan, D.; Wang, Q.; Li, Y. Taxonomic response of bacterial and fungal populations to biofertilizers applied to soil or substrate in greenhouse-grown cucumber. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etesami, H.; Jeong, B.R.; Glick, B.R. Biocontrol of plant diseases by Bacillus spp. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 126, 102048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Kamle, M.; Borah, R.; Mahato, D.K.; Sharma, B. Bacillus thuringiensis as microbial biopesticide: Uses and application for sustainable agriculture. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2021, 31, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, J.Y.; Choi, J.Y.; Li, M.S.; Jin, B.R.; Je, Y.H. Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 17, 547–559. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Monnerat, R.G.; Batista, A.C.; de Medeiros, P.T.; Martins, E.S.; Melatti, V.M.; Praça, L.B.; Dumas, V.F.; Morinaga, C.; Demo, C.; Gomes, A.C.M.; et al. Screening of Brazilian Bacillus thuringiensis isolates active against Spodoptera frugiperda, Plutella xylostella and Anticarsia gemmatalis. Biol. Control 2007, 41, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Höfte, H.; Whiteley, H.R. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol. Rev. 1989, 53, 242–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubelman, S.; Ayden, B.R.; Bader, B.M.; Brown, C.R.; Jiang, V.D. Cry1Ab Protein Does Not Persist in Soil After 3 Years of Sustained Bt Corn Use. Environ. Entomol. 2005, 34, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchis, V. From microbial sprays to insect-resistant transgenic plants: History of the biospesticide Bacillus thuringiensis. A review. Agron. Sust. Developm. 2011, 31, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zerbini, F.M.; Ribeiro, S.G. Bean Golden Mosaic Virus and Bean Golden Yellow Mosaic Virus (Geminiviridae). In Encyclopedia of Virology, 4th ed.; Dennis, H.B., Mark, Z., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianchini, A.; Buratto, J.S.; Fonseca Junior, N.S.; Moda-Cirino, V.; Carneiro, S.M.T.P.G. IPR CELEIRO: Common bean cultivar moderately resistant to bean golden mosaic vírus. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas-Vanzo, A.T.; Da Silva, C.C.; De Novaes, T.G.; Walz, D.M.; Guimarães, F.C.M.; Kuwahara, M.K.; Molina, R.O.; Junior, R.P.L. Evaluation of disease severity caused by Bean golden mosaic virus in different bean cultivars. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 43, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, A.; Farooq, M.; Lee, D.J.; Siddique, K.H. Sustainable agricultural practices for food security and ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 84076–84095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vorholt, J.A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 828–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, C.; Matsumoto, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M. Pathways to engineering the phyllosphere microbiome for sustainable crop production. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 997–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendes, R.; Garbeva, P.; Raaijmakers, J.M. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 634–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cardoso, A.M.; da Silva, C.V.F.; de Pádua, V.L. Microbial Insights into Biofortified Common Bean Cultivation. Sci 2024, 6, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6010006
Cardoso AM, da Silva CVF, de Pádua VL. Microbial Insights into Biofortified Common Bean Cultivation. Sci. 2024; 6(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6010006
Chicago/Turabian StyleCardoso, Alexander Machado, Carlos Vinicius Ferreira da Silva, and Vânia Lúcia de Pádua. 2024. "Microbial Insights into Biofortified Common Bean Cultivation" Sci 6, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6010006