Next Article in Journal
Obtaining and Characterization of an Interspecific Hybrid between Lilium callosum and ‘Snow Queen’ and Evaluation of the Botrytis Stress Response
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Anticancer Properties of Argemone mexicana L. and Berberine: A Comparative Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plant-Based Biostimulants for Seeds in the Context of Circular Economy and Sustainability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring Chemical Variability in the Essential Oils of the Thymus Genus

Department of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Institute of Horticultural Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, H-1118 Villányi Str. 29–43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(10), 1375; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101375
Submission received: 16 April 2024 / Revised: 9 May 2024 / Accepted: 13 May 2024 / Published: 15 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio-Active Compounds in Horticultural Plants)

Abstract

:
Thyme remains an indispensable herb today, finding its place in gastronomy, medicine, cosmetics, and gardens worldwide. It is highly valued in herbal remedies and pharmaceutical formulations for its antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties derived from the richness of its essential oil, which comprises various volatile components. However, climate change poses a significant challenge today, potentially affecting the quality of thyme, particularly the extracted essential oil, along with other factors such as biotic influences and the plant’s geographical distribution. Consequently, complex diversity in essential oil composition was observed, also influenced by genetic diversity within the same species, resulting in distinct chemotypes. Other factors contributing to this chemodiversity include the chosen agrotechnology and processing methods of thyme, the extraction of the essential oil, and storage conditions. In this review, we provide the latest findings on the factors contributing to the chemovariability of thyme essential oil.

1. Introduction

Thyme, belonging to the Lamiaceae family, comprises various species known for their medicinal and aromatic qualities [1]. It is indigenous to the Mediterranean region, particularly the Iberian Peninsula and Northwest Africa. The common thyme, or Thymus vulgaris, is extensively used in food flavoring, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products, contributing significantly to its economic importance [2]. Meanwhile, local species like Thymus pannonicus (Pannonian thyme) or Thymus capitatus (Conehead/Mediterranean thyme; Spanish oregano) may not have the same level of commercial cultivation but still possess medicinal properties, and they may contain unique bioactive compounds or have specific therapeutic properties that make them valuable for medicinal purposes [3,4].
Despite its significance, the classification of Thymus is complex, presenting challenges in accurately identifying species due to variability and hybridization [5]. Considering this complexity, da Silva et al. [6] evaluated the genetic relationships among Thymus taxa using AFLP markers, which supported the accepted taxonomy based on morphological traits and essential oil content. Furthermore, Thymus taxa display variations in essential oil yield and composition. In the study of György et al. [7], T. vulgaris clones represented five different chemotypes and were distinguished using 12 ISSR primers, where thymol chemotype showed the most distinct separation. The study showed the potential of using molecular markers in the breeding and selection of T. vulgaris, being able to differentiate different chemotypes. Different major compounds are identified in Thymus holosericeus populations from various Ionian Islands in Greece [8]. Similarly, five Thymus species from Section Hyphodromi were found to have distinct chemotypes based on their essential oil composition, revealing variations in the abundance of sesquiterpenoids, aromatic compounds, and major components such as thymol and carvacrol [9]. These differences in essential composition between Thymus taxa lead to the distinction of various chemotypes, with the understanding that such variations may be attributed to genetic diversity and ecological factors [10].
In the following sections, we focus on the chemovariability of thyme essential oil by presenting factors that encompass genetic and ontogenetic effects, geographical variations, climatic influences, agrotechnological factors, as well as the influence of various processing methods.

2. Literature Research Methodology

Bibliographic research was carried out using reputable research database engines such as Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, SpringerLink, and Web of Science. Most of the consulted journals are highly indexed and peer-reviewed, including Essential Oil-Bearing Plants, Agronomy, Horticulturae, and Industrial Crops and Products. E-books were consulted as well, primarily “Thyme—The Genus Thymus”, in addition to referring to international standards organizations such as ISO and Ph. Eur. To obtain more accurate literature results, the following keywords were primarily used: “Thymus genus”, “Thyme”, “Chemodiversity”, “Chemotype”, “Factors”, “Essential oil”, and “Terpenes”.
The entire procedure followed for the literature research is presented in Figure 1. After inputting the keywords, several literature pieces were obtained from the databases. Approximately half of them were removed due to duplication reasons, articles focusing on other medicinal plants in their experimental part, or them being old publications. We also aimed to use the most recent results. A screening was conducted later, and irrelevant studies were excluded, followed by the retrieval of some literature, mainly the oldest ones, according to their date of publication, due to insufficient recent results. Finally, the remaining literature was assessed for eligibility. Studies were excluded if they focused on secondary metabolites not found in the essential oil of thyme, if they were superficial studies about thyme essential oil without focusing on its volatile components, or if they were articles with insufficient data, language problems, etc. In conclusion, a total of 147 pieces of literature were used in the current review out of the 723 initially identified from the databases.

3. Taxonomy and Essential Oil Production of Thyme

3.1. Taxonomy of Thyme

The Thymus genus, consisting of around 250 taxa, includes 214 species and 36 subspecies [11]. The Thymus genus is subdivided into eight sections based on geographical distribution and morphological characteristics.
The Micantes section encompasses the North African woody species T. riatarum, T. satureioides, and T. caespititius. Morphologically, they are erect plants with flat, globous, long oblong-obovate leaves and spiciform inflorescence [12,13]. α-Terpineol is considered a major active component in T. caespititius according to Miguel et al. [14], Pinto et al. [15], and Neves et al. [16]. High variability in the essential oil composition of T. riatarum in Morocco has been observed: Fadli et al. [17] revealed the dominance of Borneol as a major component, while Boubaker et al. [18] indicate the dominance of γ-terpinene and p-cymene.
Endemic to the Iberian Peninsula, the Mastichina section includes T. mastichina subsp. mastichina, T. mastichina subsp. donyanae, which are characterized generally by a high amount of 1,8-cineole, while the T. albicans species show linalool as a major compound in its essential oil in addition to 1,8-cineole. Morphologically, they show capituliform inflorescence with holotrichous stems and flat, lanceolate-to-obovate leaves [13,19,20,21].
The Piperella section represents a unique species: T. piperella, endemic to Valencia and its surrounding areas in Spain. It has similar leaves and stem morphology to the Mastichina section species, but it has a verticillaster inflorescence. p-cymene and carvacrol are considered the major active constituents in this species [13,22,23].
The Teucrioides section, originating from the Balkan Peninsula, is characterized by revolute, ovate, or triangular-ovate leaves and a verticillaster inflorescence. It comprises three different species: T. teucrioides, T. hartvigi, and T. leucospermus [13]. The three species show p-cymene as one of the main constituents within a population collected from Greece and Albania, as reported by Pitarokili et al. [24].
The Pseudothymbra section occurs in the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa. Morphologically, they are erect plants with linear revolute leaves and a capituliform inflorescence. It includes nine species: T. lotocephalus, T. villosus, T. longiflorus, T. membranaceus, T. moroderi, T. munbyanus, T. bleicherianus, T. funkii, and T. antoninae. All these species show a distinguishable number of active compounds. T. munbyanus subsp. ciliates from Algeria show carvacrol as a main constituent in its essential oil [13,25,26].
The Thymus section occurs in the Western Mediterranean region, and the plants are erect or radicant with revolute leaves and spiciform or globose inflorescences. It includes the most important species in thyme: T. vulgaris, T. zygis, and T. willdenowii [13]. T. vulgaris, commonly known as garden thyme, is a bushy, evergreen subshrub with small, highly aromatic gray-green leaves and clusters of purple or pink flowers. Several chemotypes are observed in this species, but generally thymol is considered the main constituent in the essential oil [27,28,29,30].
The Hyphodromi section consists of plants that are subtended and rooting with revolute or flat leaves and a capituliform inflorescence. The section encompasses the entire Mediterranean region and includes 60 species [13]. T. algeriensis is one of the popular species in this section with high chemical polymorphism; in Tunisia, it shows 1,8-cineole and camphor as major compounds [31], while in Algeria, in the same location but at different altitudes, T. algeriensis indicates a different chemical profile: thymol type and terpinyl acetate type [32].
The Serpyllum section includes around 120 species and occurs within the genus area. Morphologically, the plants are woody, with leaves ciliated at the base and a spiciform inflorescence. The well-known wild thyme or T. serpyllum belongs to this section, exhibiting creeping stems with pink to purple flowers. Concerning the chemical profile, thymol is considered the main active compound in its essential oil [13,33,34].

3.2. Essential oil Biosynthesis in Thyme

Thyme plants have been found to produce volatile oil in thyme glandular hairs, primarily carried out by peltate glandular trichomes (PGTs), which are responsible for the biosynthesis and accumulation of monoterpenes [35].
In Lamiaceae, glandular trichomes contain specialized secretory cells where volatile compounds are synthesized and stored within a subcuticular space, facilitating their retention in a liquid state until release [36]. The principal constituents of essential oils (EOs) are synthesized through three biosynthetic pathways: terpenes are generated via the plastidic methylerythritol phosphate pathway (MEP) and the cytosolic mevalonic acid pathway (MVA), while phenylpropenes are synthesized through the shikimic acid pathway [37,38].
The isoprenoid units (C5), dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP), and isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) are provided, respectively, via the MEP and MVA pathways. In plastids, they combine to form geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP, C10), the primary precursor for monoterpenes and diterpenes. Conversely, in the cytosol, they produce farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP, C15), the precursor for sesquiterpenes [39,40]. Terpene synthases (TPSs) catalyze the formation of these terpenes’ basic skeletons, constituting a diverse class of enzymes responsible for the vast structural variety of mono- and sesquiterpenes [40,41]. Examples of compounds generated by TPSs include thymol, carvacrol, geraniol, linalool, camphor, and β-caryophyllene. [42]. Figure 2 illustrates the molecular structure of the most significant terpenes found within the Thymus genus.

3.3. Chemical and Biological Properties of Essential Oil Active Compounds

Thymol and carvacrol are commonly regarded as the primary bioactive constituents in thyme essential oil. However, thyme oil contains a complex mixture of other compounds that contribute to its overall aroma, flavor, and therapeutic effects.

3.3.1. Chemical and Physical Properties of Thymol

Thymol is a colorless crystalline compound classified as a monoterpene phenol. Chemically, it is identified as 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenol with the formula C10H14O [43]. Thymol is produced through the aromatization of γ-terpinene to p-cymene, which undergoes hydroxylation to produce thymol [44]. Thymol is characterized by low solubility in water (1 g/liter at 20 °C) but has high solubility in alcohols and organic solvents [45,46]. It has a melting point around 50 °C [47] and a density of 0.96 g/cm3 at 25 °C [48]. Thymol has a strong flavor, but, at a suitable concentration, it can have a pleasant flavor with antibacterial efficiency (0.2 mg/mL of thymol) as described by Kerekes et al. [49].

3.3.2. Chemical and Physical Properties of Carvacrol

Carvacrol, or 5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol, has the same chemical formula as thymol, making them structural isomers. This means that the hydroxyl group is at the ortho position of the benzene ring in carvacrol, whereas it is in the meta position for thymol [50]. It has a density of 0.991 ± 0.11 g/cm3 and a surface tension of 60.38 ± 0.08 mN/m at 30 °C [51]. Carvacrol, like thymol, has low water solubility [52].
Carvacrol is more soluble in water from 25 to 35 °C compared to thymol, while at higher temperatures, between 40 and 45 °C, thymol becomes more soluble [53].

3.3.3. Biological Activities of Thymol and Carvacrol

All the active compounds present in the essential oil contribute to the medicinal properties of thyme, encompassing antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiparasitic effects [54,55].
T. vulgaris (35.42% thymol and 28.79% p-cymene) has been found to have synergistic effects with tetracycline in reducing colorectal cancer cell viability, along with high antibacterial potential against Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (Gram-negative) [56]. It also exhibits efficacy against various foodborne pathogens like Bacillus cereus (Gram-positive) and Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar (Gram-negative), showing its effectiveness in food preservation in the study by Sateriale et al. [57], which used T. vulgaris containing 44.43% thymol and 39.39% limonene.
T. vulgaris (48.96% thymol and 29.15% p-cymene) has recently been found to have antioxidant properties by protecting blood telomeres and anti-inflammatory effects by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines in chronologically aged mice [58]. Furthermore, it reduced paw edema by 89.59% within 3 h after the application of Thymus leptobotrys Murb essential oil (73.68% Carvacrol) in the study by Oubihi et al. [59]. Another investigation confirmed the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of T. vulgaris essential oil by reducing liver damage induced by renal ischemia-reperfusion in rats [60].
Arancibia et al. [61] demonstrated significant antiparasitic effects of thyme essential oil on plant-parasitic nematodes, achieving a 90% reduction in nematode numbers after 8 h of exposure in vitro. T. serpyllum (59.93% Carvacrol) essential oil demonstrated effective antiparasitic effects on Demodex mites, with carvacrol identified as a key active ingredient contributing to its efficacy [62].

3.3.4. Chemical Synthesis Methods of Active Compounds: Focus on Thymol

The natural sources of active compounds remain important; however, today, the use of synthetic routes for their production has developed extensively, presenting a valuable avenue for developing novel compounds with improved properties for various industrial and medicinal purposes [63].
Thymol, a natural phenolic monoterpene, has been chemically synthesized through various methods. In 1920, Max Phillips and H. D. Gibbs [64] described a synthesis starting from p-cymene, involving nitration, reduction, sulfonation, and subsequent treatments to produce thymol. In 1932, an alternative approach was introduced by Niederl and Natelson [65], which involved the catalyzed condensation of propylene with m-cresol, facilitated by sulfuric acid; following this, the acid group was eliminated, resulting in the formation of thymol. Nowadays, industrial-scale production commonly uses the Bayer process, which involves the liquid-phase alkylation of m-cresol with propene at a high temperature and pressure using “active aluminum” catalysts, yielding thymol [66,67]. Indeed, subsequent studies have investigated diverse methodologies for m-cresol alkylation, employing a range of catalysts and reaction conditions. For instance, these include the utilization of propylene alongside aluminum 3-methylphenoxide, as reported by Grabowska et al. [68], as well as the application of microwave-assisted reactions in conjunction with carbonized sulfonic acidic resin catalysts, as highlighted by Ali and Gaikar [69]. In 2023, Mesbah et al. [70] efficiently synthesized the thymol from m-cresol through alkylation using isopropanol and ZSM-5 acid catalysts.

3.4. Authenticity of Thyme Essential Oil

3.4.1. Methods for Detecting Active Compounds in Essential Oils

The authenticity of thyme essential oil can be accurately assessed using various analytical techniques. One of the most popular is gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which enables the identification and quantification of a wide range of compounds present in complex mixtures like plant extracts, providing valuable information on their chemical composition [71,72]. This technique allows for the analysis of bioactive compounds, alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, glycosides, and other secondary metabolites in herbal plants, aiding in the discovery of potential therapeutic agents [71,73].
Other methods have been employed to detect active compounds in thyme such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), which separates and quantifies compounds based on their interaction with a stationary phase and a mobile phase [74,75]. Spectroscopic techniques, including infrared (IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, are also used to analyze the chemical structure of compounds in thyme. They provide information about functional groups and molecular structure [76].

3.4.2. Regulations and Standards for Thyme Essential Oil

The methods discussed above are the best way to confirm the authenticity, detect any adulteration, or identify contamination in thyme essential oil. These can be ensured through regulations and standards governing the production and marketing of essential oils from the main industrial thyme species.

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

The ISO, recognized for its global relevance in standards, specifies the physical requirements of essential oil extracted from Thymus vulgaris and Thymus zygis (thymol type). It is required to have a mobile liquid appearance, with a color ranging from yellow to red, and possess an aromatic and phenolic odor with a spicy base. The required chemical profile is illustrated in Table 1, which shows the minimum and maximum percentages of active compounds in thyme. Specifically, the thymol content is specified to be a minimum of 35% and a maximum of 55% (ISO 19817:2017) [77].

The European Pharmacopeia (Ph. Eur)

The Ph. Eur (11.0), recognized as a legal reference for standards and quality control of pharmaceutical products, also establishes standards for thyme products. Thymi herba, which refers to the leaves and flower parts separated from the dried stems of Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymus zygis L., are required to contain a minimum of 12 mL/kg of essential oil (anhydrous drug), of which 40% should comprise the sum of thymol and carvacrol contents (0865 (07/2014)) [78]. For Serphylli herba (Thymus serphyllum L.), known as wild thyme, a minimum of 3.0 mL/kg of essential oil (dried drug) is set as the standard requirement (1891 (07/2014)) [78].
The Ph. Eur also sets standards for the content of active compounds for Thymi typo thymolo aetheroleum, which describes the essential oil obtained from the fresh flowering aerial parts of Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymus zygis. The required chemical profile for Ph. Eur. 11.0 is presented in Table 1, where minimum standards slightly differ from those set by ISO 19817:2017 [78]. Specifically, the minimum thymol content is determined at 35% for ISO (19817:2017), whereas it is 37% for Ph. Eur (11.0).

4. Genetic and Ontogenetic Factors

4.1. Chemodiversity between Thymus Taxa

The essential oil composition within the Thymus genus displays significant variability. In the study conducted by Trendafilova et al. [79], Thymus moesiacus, T. jankae, T. vandasii, T. longicaulis, and T. sibthorpii share linalool as the primary component, but show variations in the concentrations of other prominent components such as geranyl acetate, geraniol, and linalyl acetate. Aksit et al. [80] identified thymol, p-cymene, eucalyptol, camphor, α-pinene, and carvacrol as the main components in the essential oils of Thymus pectinatus, T. convolutus, and T. vulgaris. Furthermore, Thymus atticus, T. leucotrichus, and T. striatus are characterized by high amounts of sesquiterpenoids, primarily β-caryophyllene, while T. thracicus exhibited a mixed mono-/sesquiterpene chemotype with β-myrcene, cis-sabinene hydrate, τ-cadinol, and elemol as its major components [9,79]. Thymus kotschyanus var. kotschyanus and var. glabrescens reveal distinct chemotypes, characterized by major compounds such as thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene [81]. Similar findings regarding these components were reported by Hanoglu et al. [82] in the case of Thymus capitatus.
Moreover, different chemotypes were identified in Thymus pannonicus, each characterized by specific dominant compounds. Some chemotypes showed main monoterpenes like thymol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene, while others contained compounds such as linalool, geraniol, and linalyl acetate. Sesquiterpenes, including germacrene-D, β-caryophyllene, and β-bisabolol, are also present in certain chemotypes [83]. Lemon thyme, scientifically identified as Thymus citriodorus, exhibits distinct chemical constituents, as evaluated by Jurevičiūtė et al. [84]. Noteworthy compounds include geraniol (36.6%), geranial (17.5%), nerol (11.5%), and neral (10.2%).

4.2. Intraspecific Variability

Intraspecific variability exerts a considerable influence on the composition of thyme essential oil. A study on 103 Korean populations of Thymus quinquecostatus revealed different chemotypes characterized by dominant compounds in the essential oil, including thymol, geraniol, geranyl acetate, and linalool. The chemical polymorphism observed among thyme populations was associated with the genetic diversity of individuals [85]. Substantial variability was observed in the ‘Standard Winter’ cultivar of Thymus vulgaris, showing diverse chemical compositions of the essential oil and in phenolic acids (caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid and p-Coumaric acid) and flavonoids contents [86].
Llorens-Molina et al. [87] investigated the chemodiversity of 85 populations of Thymus vulgaris in Spain, ultimately revealing five distinct profiles based on the essential oil composition as shown presented in Figure 3: camphane skeleton, oxygenated sesquiterpenic fraction, 1,8-cineole-rich with camphor and borneol, camphor and terpinen-4-ol, and linalool chemotype. A similar study was conducted on 21 populations of Thymus zygis L., leading to the distinction of seven main chemotypes [88]. High chemical variability in essential oil content was observed among seven populations of Thymus caramanicus in Iran, classifying the populations into three chemotypes (carvacrol, carvacrol/thymol, thymol/carvacrol) [89]. This variation can be an indicator of the importance of genetic diversity in the chemodiversity of thyme. In fact, the variability in essential oil composition can pose challenges in standardizing raw materials, but it also provides opportunities for breeding and the development of valuable components.

4.3. Impact of Phenological Stage

The composition of essential oil in thyme undergoes significant changes based on the plant’s growth stage, with higher yields and compositions observed during the blooming stage compared to the pre-flowering stage [90,91,92]. In Thymus armeniacus, Carvacrol exhibits a significantly higher amount at 100% of the flowering phase compared to 50%, with linalool, borneol, thymol, and β-caryophyllene showing a similar trend [90]. During the flowering stage, essential oils in Thymus numidicus are rich in oxygenated monoterpenes (82.11% compared to 67.2% in the pre-flowering stage), such as thymol and p-cimene-7-ol, known for their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [93].
The chemical composition of essential oil also varies depending on the year of harvesting and the phenological stage of the plants; thymol and carvacrol were the main compounds in the essential oil of T. vulgaris studied by Moisa et al. [94], but their amounts varied depending on the year of harvesting and the flowering stage. Antimicrobial activity, correlated to the amount of compounds detected in the essential oil, was found to be higher during the seed set stage in particular for Thymus fedtschenkoi Ronniger [91].
Several other studies have investigated the variability of compounds along the flowering stage. In Thymus × citriodorus, the highest percentage of terpinolene was observed during the flowering stage [95]. In Thymus piperella, the concentration of carvacrol peaks at the beginning of the flowering stage, a trend similarly observed in γ-terpinene but with a slightly lower rate, while the yield of p-cymene decreases during the flowering stage [96]. In Kermanian thyme (Thymus caramanicus Jalas.), thymol was the main compound of the oil in all phenological stages, with the highest essence and thymol yields obtained during the fruit set stage [97].
In summary, thyme essential oil composition varies significantly across growth stages, with the flowering stage being particularly influential. Key compounds like carvacrol, terpinolene, and thymol show significant fluctuations as discussed. These findings underline the importance of considering phenological stages during the harvesting to optimize thyme oil quality for diverse applications.

5. Environmental Factors

5.1. Geographical Variation of the Essential Oil Composition

The essential oil composition of thyme varies depending on geographical location; this variability has been presented in several papers. Toncer et al. [95] conducted a study on T. citriodorus grown in the semi-arid continental climate of southeastern Anatolia, Türkiye, revealing variations in essential oil composition during different phenological stages. Major compounds identified included terpinolene, α-terpineol, linalool, bornyl acetate, and borneol. In contrast, T. citriodorus cultivated in Iran was dominated by geraniol, geranial, and neral [98].
Further insights into the geographical influence on thyme essential oils were provided by Chbel et al. [99], who analyzed Thymus vulgaris essential oils from Morocco and France. Variances in major constituents, such as borneol, α-terpinol, and carvacrol (31.04%, 15.16% and 7.13%, respectively) in Moroccan oils compared to thymol, ortho-cymene, and γ-terpinene (35.77%, 17.23% and 8.05%, respectively) in French oils, were observed. Additionally, the anti-microbial and free radical scavenging activities were found to be higher in T. vulgaris cultivated in France. Satyal et al. [100] analyzed different chemotypes of Thymus vulgaris essential oils and identified 20 distinct chemotypes based on their compositions. Specifically, the essential oil from Nyons, France, exhibited the linalool chemotype, whereas the oil sample from Jablanicki, Serbia, displayed the geraniol chemotype. Additionally, the essential oil from the Pomoravje District, Serbia, was characterized by the sabinene hydrate chemotype, while that from Richerenches, France, evidenced the thymol chemotype. Lastly, the types of essential oils in thyme differ not just between countries but also among nearby regions. This suggests that environmental factors have a substantial impact on these differences.

5.2. Climate and Environmental Influences on the Essential Oil Composition

The essential oil composition of thyme is influenced by various abiotic factors, contributing to its diverse chemical profile. Abiotic factors such as moisture levels, salinity, temperature, sunlight exposure, heavy metal content, and soil composition all play a role in shaping the composition of thyme essential oils.

5.2.1. The Effect of Drought Stress

Drought stress has been found to impact the essential oil composition of thyme. Studies indicate that drought stress can result in significant increases in the concentration of 1,8-cineole in wild Thymus vulgaris L. in the eastern Iberian Peninsula [101]. Similarly, an increase in 1,8-cineole was observed in T. daenesis and T. vulgaris cultivated under drought stress conditions [102]. Moreover, it was revealed that the percentages of γ-terpinene and p-cymene in the oil were higher, while the percentage of thymol was significantly reduced under drought stress [102,103].

5.2.2. The Effect of Salinity Stress

Salinity has been found to positively impact the essential oil composition of thyme. It influences phenolic compounds, leading to an increase in total phenolic monoterpenes such as γ-terpinene and p-cymene, leaf flavonoid content, and various phenolic acids. Indeed, concentrations of cinnamic acid, gallic acid, and rosmarinic acid were significantly elevated under salinity stress, while thymol was significantly reduced [104,105]. It has also been demonstrated that at a NaCl level of 100 mM, thymol and carvacrol increased in Thymus vulgaris cv varico 3 [106]. However, in a study on Thymus maroccanus, increased salinity did not affect the essential oil content [107].

5.2.3. The Effect of Temperature and Humidity

A study on Thymus transcaucasicus revealed that elevated air temperature and lower humidity positively influenced herbal productivity, leading to increased essential oil, carotenoids, and polyphenols. The essential oil composition showed variations based on temperature and humidity conditions: at 25 °C, only borneol and α-terpineol increased, whereas at 15 °C, 1,8-cineole, thymol, carvacrol, geraniol, and geranyl acetate showed an increase. Furthermore, borneol and carvacrol reached their peaks at 50% humidity, whereas linalool and geraniol increased at 90% humidity [108]. Interestingly, thymol biosynthesis, controlled by gene expression (DXR and TPS1), exhibited a similar reducing trend as thymol under cold stress treatment [109].

5.2.4. The Effect of Light

Sunlight intensity also plays a significant role in thyme. Higher light intensities result in increased oil yields and greater leaf thickness, contributing to enhanced biomass production in Thymus vulgaris. Interestingly, the concentration of thymol in the essential oil remains unaffected by variations in light incidence [110,111]. In a field study examining the impact of solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation, on three Thymus species (T. daenensis, T. fedtschenkoi, T. vulgaris), enriched UV led to varied effects on phenolic compounds in the essential oil, with some, like thymol, carvacrol, and γ-terpinene, increasing, and others decreasing [2].

5.2.5. The Effect of Heavy Metals

The effect of heavy metals on the essential oil composition of thyme has also been studied. One study investigated the impact of excessive concentrations of heavy metals such as nickel, copper, and zinc on Thymus vulgaris plants. It was observed that the antioxidant capacity and total phenolic compounds decreased with an increased concentration of these heavy metals [112]. In fact, high concentrations of Zn, Pb, and Cr have been observed, affecting the quality of the produced thyme [113,114].

5.2.6. The Effect of Soil Properties

The essential oil composition of thyme is influenced by soil properties such as humus, pH, organic content, nitrogen, phosphorus, and the presence of certain elements. The presence of humus in the soil positively influences the accumulation of essential oil in Thymus pulegioides. Additionally, soil composition with elevated levels of sulfur and mobile phosphorus, along with lower sodium content, promotes the prevalence of the carvacrol chemotype in T. pulegioides [115]. In Thymus vulgaris, the application of humic acid to the soil enhances the essential oil content, with the highest percentage of thymol observed under higher levels of humic acid [116]. The thymol content in T. kotschyanus is also influenced by the sodium absorption ratio (SAR), organic content, and the percentage of nitrogen and calcium carbonate in the soil, as demonstrated through multivariable regression and RDA methods employed by Aminzadeh et al. [117]. Thymus pannonicus and T. praecox exhibit different essential oil chemotypes, with T. pannonicus thriving in soil characterized by slightly acidic or neutral pH and elevated levels of certain elements such as K, Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, and Cr [118].

6. Agrotechnical Factors

In addition to the abiotic factors, biotic influences, such as microbial activity and interactions with other plant species, also contribute to the chemical variability in the essential oil of thyme.

6.1. Effect of Biofertilizers

Biotic factors, including the application of bio-fertilizers and stress-modulating nanoparticles, significantly influence the composition of thyme essential oil. Amani Machiani et al. [119] demonstrated that the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and chitosan nanoparticles (CHT) as bio-fertilizers, either individually or in combination, enhances both the quantity and quality of thyme essential oil, particularly thymol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene. Furthermore, the application of Thiobacillus bio-fertilizer and treatment with superabsorbent were found to impact the content of thymol, caryophyllene, and borneol in Thymus vulgaris and T. daenesis [120]. Abdel-Hamid et al. [121] revealed that the inoculation of a bacterial consortium, acting as a plant growth-promoting bacteria, could affect the oil composition in T. vulgaris, resulting in a higher thymol content compared to the control.

6.2. Effect of Plant Density

In addition, thyme plant density within a specific area is another factor influencing the essential oil composition of thyme. MalekMaleki et al. [122] found that reducing plant density in Thymbra spicata L. led to a decrease in total phenol and flavonoids. Optimal row spacing between 20 and 30 cm has been suggested for achieving the best morphological and biochemical plant parameters [122,123]. Conversely, Punetha et al. [124] demonstrated that Thymus linearis of the Himalayan thyme prefers narrower spacing and higher plant densities, resulting in increased yields of essential oil and improved quality.
The composition of thyme essential oil is highly influenced by a variety of factors, as discussed previously and summarized in Table 2, showing the effect of different abiotic and biotic factors on essential oil composition of thyme species. Under the different mentioned factors, Thymus vulgaris shows an increased rate of thymol in the essential oil, in case of increased salinity at 150 mM NaCl [125] and at 100 mM NaCl [126] using substrate that contain 100 gm−2 of humic acid, using biofertilizers such as AMF [119] or PGPB [121], and in the case of increasing shade rate by using shade nets with a shade index of 40% [127]. However, thymol rate decreased in case of drought stress [102,103]. In fact, in response to stress, plants may exhibit a resistance mechanism by partially closing their stomata, which restricts the absorption of a reduced amount of CO2 by the plant, directing it primarily towards the synthesis of essential secondary metabolites crucial for preventing cellular oxidation [128].
A high variability has been noticed in the concentration of the other active compounds in the different factors mentioned in Table 2, which can illustrate how these factors collectively contribute to the complexity and variability of thyme oil. While, in general, biotic factors such as AMF or PGPB and the application of humic acid showed higher active compound rates, this can be an effective way to obtain a higher quality of essential oil in thyme.

7. Impact of Processing Methods

7.1. Drying Methods

The drying methods employed for thyme significantly influence the composition of its essential oil. In the case of Thymus vulgaris, drying at 35 °C was identified as the most effective for essential oil content compared to natural drying, drying at 40 °C, or the freeze-dried method. However, it is noteworthy that the thymol content reached its peak at 40 °C [130]. Furthermore, a combination of convective pre-drying at 40 °C and vacuum-microwave finish drying at 240 W resulted in higher volatile compounds when compared to convective drying, vacuum-microwave drying, and freeze-drying methods [131].
The freezing stabilization method (to −18 °C in 4 h) has been shown to provide better preservation of the components of the essential oil of T. vulgaris compared to the freeze-drying method (between −50 and 20 °C in 24 h) or air drying (between 38 and 45 °C) as demonstrated by Usai et al. [132]. Lyophilization of flowering stems in T. vulgaris has been found to result in better preservation of thymol and carvacrol compared to natural drying and oven drying at 30 °C. However, lyophilization may result in lower levels of p-cymene compared to natural drying and oven drying at 30 °C [133].

7.2. Extraction Methods

Different methods of essential oil extraction have been shown to significantly influence the composition of thyme essential oil. A comparison of distillation methods, specifically, water-steam distillation and hydrodistillation, as detailed by Wesolowska et al. [134], demonstrated significant differences in the chemical composition of garden thyme oil, resulting in variations in the dominant components such as thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene. Khokhlov et al. [135] revealed that using the steam distillation method for producing essential oil in both thymol and linalool chemotypes of Thymus vulgaris resulted in a decrease in their main compounds (linalool and thymol, respectively) compared to the hydrodistillation method using Clevenger apparatus. This alteration also affected the composition of other components. Conversely, Sadjia et al. [136] found that steam distillation of Thymus pallescens yielded slightly higher contents of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and oxygenated sesquiterpenes compared to steam diffusion and hydrodistillation methods.
Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is an efficient and selective alternative to conventional extraction methods that uses supercritical fluids, such as CO2, as the extracting solvent [137]. Oszagyan et al. [138] revealed that by using SFE, they obtained a higher amount of carvacrol but a lower amount of thymol compared to steam distillation. After comparison with different extraction conditions, Kutta et al. [139] proposed the optimal parameter profile for SFE-CO2 to obtain a rich extract with volatile compounds for T. vulgaris (17 MPa, 45 °C, 30 min) and for T. pannonicus (24 MPa, 55 °C, 20 min). In contrast, a higher amount of monoterpenes in T. vulgaris was detected using simultaneous distillation extraction (SDE) compared to SFE [140]. Additionally, hydrodistilled essential oil of T. vulgaris showed a higher thymol ratio (48–50%) than the SFE samples (10–15%) [138]. Another modern method for extracting organic compounds is solid-phase microextraction (SPME), which is also a solvent-free method. It uses stationary phases on a fiber to extract analytes for GC analysis, classified as direct or headspace methods [141]. Sárosi and Ruff [142] advised optimizing the SPME method according to each plant species and revealed higher content of active compounds, particularly thymol, in the hydrodistilled oil than when using the SPME method.
Interestingly, contrasting studies have demonstrated that the extraction method, whether classical hydro-distillation, microwave hydro-distillation, or supercritical fluid extraction, did not influence the composition of thyme essential oil, as indicated by András et al. [143]. Similarly, Gedikoğlu et al. [144] observed a similar composition of thyme essential oil using both extraction methods: hydrodistillation and microwave-assisted extraction.

7.3. Storage Conditions

Storage temperature has been shown to affect the composition of essential oils extracted from thyme. Storing the oil at room temperature (25 °C) initially resulted in a reduction in the compounds. However, after 3 months under the same storage conditions, the levels of thymol and carvacrol increased. In contrast, storing the essential oil in a refrigerator preserved its primary quality with minimal alterations to the composition [145]. According to Mohammadian et al. [146], thymol content in Thymus vulgaris remained stable during the first 3 months of storage; however, it subsequently decreased under different conditions studied, including room temperature, refrigerator (4 °C), and freezer (−20 °C).
Thymol, γ-terpinene, and carvacrol have been better preserved after freezing and storing at −20 °C compared to the drying and freeze-drying methods, which were stored at 20 °C and in the dark [132]. Similar results regarding the increase in thymol and carvacrol have been reported by Rowshan et al. [147] under all the studied storage conditions: ambient temperature (25 °C), refrigerator (4 °C), and freezer (−20 °C).

8. Conclusions

In summary, the essential oil composition of thyme is a complex interplay of various factors, geographical and environmental influences, plant development traits and processing methods. The inherent variability within the Thymus genus, coupled with specific chemotypes and their responses to environmental stimuli, emphasizes the rich diversity observed in thyme essential oils. This variability presents both a challenge and an opportunity for industries dependent on thyme oil, necessitating careful consideration of factors such as growth stages during harvesting and appropriate processing methods. As a result, understanding the complexity of the interaction of these elements is essential for optimizing thyme oil quality and ensuring its suitability for diverse applications.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

A special acknowledgment is dedicated to the Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship for supporting the current research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bouyahya, A.; Chamkhi, I.; Guaouguaou, F.E.; Benali, T.; Balahbib, A.; El Omari, N.; Taha, D.; El-Shazly, M.; El Menyiy, N. Ethnomedicinal Use, Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Food Benefits of Thymus Capitatus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 259, 112925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mumivand, H.; Shayganfar, A.; Tsaniklidis, G.; Bistgani, Z.E.; Fanourakis, D.; Nicola, S. Pheno-Morphological and Essential Oil Composition Responses to UVA Radiation and Protectants: A Case Study in Three Thymus Species. Horticulturae 2021, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sostaric, I.; Arsenijevic, J.; Acic, S.; Stevanovic, Z.D. Essential Oil Polymorphism of Thymus Pannonicus All. (Lamiaceae) in Serbia. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2012, 15, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maniki, E.; Kostoglou, D.; Paterakis, N.; Nikolaou, A.; Kourkoutas, Y.; Papachristoforou, A.; Giaouris, E. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, and Antibiofilm Properties of Essential Oil from Thymus capitatus Plants Organically Cultured on the Greek Island of Lemnos. Molecules 2023, 28, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Beicu, R.; Neacşu, A.; Imbrea, I.M. Considerations Regarding the Taxonomy of the Genus Thymus in Romania. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 51, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Da Silva, D.V.; Duarte, J.M.; Miguel, M.G.; Leitão, J.M. AFLP Assessment of the Genetic Relationships among 12 Thymus Taxa Occurring in Portugal. Plant Genet. Resour. 2017, 15, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. György, Z.; Incze, N.; Pluhár, Z. Differentiating Thymus vulgaris Chemotypes with ISSR Molecular Markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2020, 92, 104118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tsiftsoglou, O.S.; Stagiopoulou, R.; Krigas, N.; Lazari, D. Exploring the Ecological Preferences and Essential Oil Variability in Wild-Growing Populations of the Endangered Local Greek Endemic Thymus holosericeus (Lamiaceae). Plants 2023, 12, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Trendafilova, A.; Todorova, M.; Ivanova, V.; Zhelev, P.; Aneva, I. Essential Oil Composition of Five Thymus Species from Bulgaria. Chem. Biodivers. 2021, 18, e2100498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ćavar Zeljković, S.; Maksimović, M. Chemical Composition and Bioactivity of Essential Oil from Thymus Species in Balkan Peninsula. Phytochem. Rev. 2015, 14, 335–352. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stahl-Biskup, E.; Venskutonis, R.P. Thyme. In Handbook of Herbs and Spices, 2nd ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2012; Volume 1, pp. 499–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Belmalha, S.; Bouamri, R.; Echchgadda, G.; Ibijbijen, J.; Nassiri, L.; Bachir, S.; Rachidi, F.; Zouhair, R.; Amechrouq, A.; El Idrissi, M. Characterizing the Major Morphological Traits and Chemical Compositions in Nine Species of Wild Thyme from Morocco. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 145, 188–200. [Google Scholar]
  13. Morales, R. The History Botany and Taxonomy of the Genus Thymus. In Thyme—The Genus Thymus; Stahl-Biskup, E., Saez, F., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2002; pp. 11–43. [Google Scholar]
  14. Miguel, G.; Simões, M.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Carvalho, L. Composition and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oils of Thymus caespititius, Thymus camphoratus and Thymus mastichina. Food Chem. 2004, 86, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pinto, E.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Oliveira, P.; Coelho, J.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L. Activity of Thymus caespititius Essential Oil and α-Terpineol against Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 62, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Neves, A.; Marto, J.; Duarte, A.; Gonçalves, L.M.; Pinto, P.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Ribeiro, H.M. Characterization of Portuguese Thymbra capitata, Thymus caespititius and Myrtus communis Essential Oils in Topical Formulations. Flavour. Fragr. J. 2017, 32, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fadli, M.; Bolla, J.M.; Mezrioui, N.E.; Pagès, J.M.; Hassani, L. First Evidence of Antibacterial and Synergistic Effects of Thymus riatarum Essential Oil with Conventional Antibiotics. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 61, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boubaker, H.; Karim, H.; El Hamdaoui, A.; Msanda, F.; Leach, D.; Bombarda, I.; Vanloot, P.; Abbad, A.; Boudyach, E.H.; Ait Ben Aoumar, A. Chemical Characterization and Antifungal Activities of Four Thymus Species Essential Oils against Postharvest Fungal Pathogens of Citrus. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 86, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Girón, V.; Garnatje, T.; Vallès, J.; Pérez-Collazos, E.; Catalán, P.; Valdés, B. Geographical Distribution of Diploid and Tetraploid Cytotypes of Thymus Sect. mastichina (Lamiaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula, Genome Size and Evolutionary Implications. Folia Geobot. 2012, 47, 441–460. [Google Scholar]
  20. Roxo, M.; Zuzarte, M.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Alves-Silva, J.M.; Cavaleiro, C.; Cruz, M.T.; Salgueiro, L. Antifungal and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of the Endangered Aromatic Plant Thymus albicans. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Salgueiro, L.R.; Vila, R.; Tomàs, X.; Cañigueral, S.; Da Cunha, A.P.; Adzet, T. Composition and Variability of the Essential Oils of Thymus Species from Section Mastichina from Portugal. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1997, 25, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ruiz-Navajas, Y.; Viuda-Martos, M.; Sendra, E.; Perez-Alvarez, J.A.; Fernández-López, J. Chemical Characterization and Antibacterial Activity of Thymus moroderi and Thymus piperella Essential Oils, Two Thymus Endemic Species from Southeast of Spain. Food Control. 2012, 27, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruiz-Navajas, Y.; Viuda-Martos, M.; Barber, X.; Sendra, E.; Perez-Alvarez, J.A.; Fernández-López, J. Effect of Chitosan Edible Films Added with Thymus moroderi and Thymus piperella Essential Oil on Shelf-Life of Cooked Cured Ham. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 6493–6501. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Pitarokili, D.; Constantinidis, T.; Saitanis, C.; Tzakou, O. Volatile Compounds in Thymus Sect. teucrioides (Lamiaceae): Intraspecific and Interspecific Diversity, Chemotaxonomic Significance and Exploitation Potential. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 593–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Benomari, F.Z.; Djabou, N.; Moumani, M.; Hassani, F.; Muselli, A.; Costa, J. Chemical Variability of Essential Oils of Three Subspecies of Thymus munbyanus Boiss. & Reut. from Western Algeria. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2020, 32, 474–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tefiani, C.; Riazi, A.; Youcefi, F.; Aazza, S.; Gago, C.; Faleiro, M.L.; Pedro, L.G.; Barroso, J.G.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Megías, C.; et al. Ammoides pusilla (Apiaceae) and Thymus munbyanus (Lamiaceae) from Algeria Essential Oils: Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activities. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2015, 27, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borugă, O.; Jianu, C.; Mişcă, C.; Goleţ, I.; Gruia, A.T.; Horhat, F.G. Thymus vulgaris Essential Oil: Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity. J. Med. Life 2014, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Galovičová, L.; Borotová, P.; Valková, V.; Vukovic, N.L.; Vukic, M.; Terentjeva, M.; Štefániková, J.; Ďúranová, H.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Kačániová, M. Thymus serpyllum Essential Oil and Its Biological Activity as a Modern Food Preserver. Plants 2021, 10, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vouillamoz, J.F.; Christ, B. Thymus vulgaris L.: Thyme. In Medicinal, Aromatic and Stimulant Plants. Handbook of Plant Breeding; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 12, pp. 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mokhtarzadeh, S.; Demirci, B.; Khawar, K.M.; Kirimer, N. Determination of Volatile Components in Thymus vulgaris L. under In Vitro Conditions. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2018, 21, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zouari, N.; Ayadi, I.; Fakhfakh, N.; Rebai, A.; Zouari, S. Variation of Chemical Composition of Essential Oils in Wild Populations of Thymus algeriensis Boiss. et Reut., a North African Endemic Species. Lipids Health Dis. 2012, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hazzit, M.; Baaliouamer, A.; Veríssimo, A.R.; Faleiro, M.L.; Miguel, M.G. Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Algerian Thymus Oils. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Galovičová, L.; Borotová, P.; Valková, V.; Vukovic, N.L.; Vukic, M.; Štefániková, J.; Ďúranová, H.; Kowalczewski, P.Ł.; Čmiková, N.; Kačániová, M. Thymus vulgaris Essential Oil and Its Biological Activity. Plants 2021, 10, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nikolić, M.; Glamočlija, J.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Calhelha, R.C.; Fernandes, Â.; Marković, T.; Marković, D.; Giweli, A.; Soković, M. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Antitumor Activity of Thymus serpyllum L., Thymus algeriensis Boiss. and Reut and Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yamaura, T.; Tanaka, S.; Tabata, M. Localization of the Biosynthesis and Accumulation of Monoterpenoids in Glandular Trichomes of Thyme. Planta Med. 1992, 58, 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  36. Turner, G.W.; Gershenzon, J.; Croteau, R.B. Development of Peltate Glandular Trichomes of Peppermint. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 665–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sapir-Mir, M.; Mett, A.; Belausov, E.; Tal-Meshulam, S.; Frydman, A.; Gidoni, D.; Eya, Y. Peroxisomal Localization of Arabidopsis Isopentenyl Diphosphate Isomerases Suggests That Part of the Plant Isoprenoid Mevalonic Acid Pathway Is Compartmentalized to Peroxisomes. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1219–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Franz, C.; Novak, J. Sources of Essential Oils. In Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology, and Applications; Can Baser, K.H., Buchbauer, G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 39–81. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Liu, N.; Bai, H.; Sun, G.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L. Chromosome-Level Assembly and Analysis of the Thymus Genome Provide Insights into Glandular Secretory Trichome Formation and Monoterpenoid Biosynthesis in Thyme. Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tholl, D. Biosynthesis and Biological Functions of Terpenoids in Plants. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2015, 148, 63–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chen, F.; Tholl, D.; Bohlmann, J.; Pichersky, E. The Family of Terpene Synthases in Plants: A Mid-Size Family of Genes for Specialized Metabolism That Is Highly Diversified throughout the Kingdom. Plant J. 2011, 66, 212–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Stahl-Biskup, E. Essential Oil Chemistry of the Genus Thymus—A Global View. In Thyme—The Genus Thymus; Stahl-Biskup, E., Saez, F., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2002; pp. 75–124. [Google Scholar]
  43. Agarwal, S.; Tripathi, S.; Mishra, N. Pharmacological Potential of Thymol. Innov. Food Technol. Curr. Perspect. Future Goals 2020, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Poulose, A.J.; Croteau, R. Biosynthesis of Aromatic Monoterpenes: Conversion of γ-Terpinene to p-Cymene and Thymol in Thymus vulgaris L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1978, 187, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhu, P.; Chen, Y.; Fang, J.; Wang, Z.; Xie, C.; Hou, B.; Chen, W.; Xu, F. Solubility and Solution Thermodynamics of Thymol in Six Pure Organic Solvents. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2016, 92, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Budavari, S.; Maryadele, J.; O’Neil, A.S.; Patricia, E. Heckelman. In The Merck Index; Merck: Rahway, NJ, USA, 1989; pp. 2330–2331. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ponce Cevallos, P.A.; Buera, M.P.; Elizalde, B.E. Encapsulation of Cinnamon and Thyme Essential Oils Components (Cinnamaldehyde and Thymol) in β-Cyclodextrin: Effect of Interactions with Water on Complex Stability. J. Food Eng. 2010, 99, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Elvers, B. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kerekes, E.B.; Vidács, A.; Török, J.J.; Gömöri, C.; Petkovits, T.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Kadaikunnan, S.; Alharbi, N.S.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Krisch, J. Anti-Listerial Effect of Selected Essential Oils and Thymol. Acta Biol. Hung. 2016, 67, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Natal, C.M.; Fernandes, M.J.G.; Pinto, N.F.S.; Pereira, R.B.; Vieira, T.F.; Rodrigues, A.R.O.; Pereira, D.M.; Sousa, S.F.; Fortes, A.G.; Castanheira, E.M.S.; et al. New Carvacrol and Thymol Derivatives as Potential Insecticides: Synthesis, Biological Activity, Computational Studies and Nanoencapsulation. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 34024–34035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gandova, V.; Lazarov, A.; Fidan, H.; Dimov, M.; Stankov, S.; Denev, P.; Ercisli, S.; Stoyanova, A.; Gulen, H.; Assouguem, A.; et al. Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Carvacrol. Open Chem. 2023, 21, 20220319. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kfoury, M.; Landy, D.; Ruellan, S.; Auezova, L.; Greige-Gerges, H.; Fourmentin, S. Determination of Formation Constants and Structural Characterization of Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes with Two Phenolic Isomers: Carvacrol and Thymol. Beilstein. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Martins, M.A.R.; Silva, L.P.; Ferreira, O.; Schröder, B.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Pinho, S.P. Terpenes Solubility in Water and Their Environmental Distribution. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 241, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ali, H.E.; Tong, Y.; Ali, H.E.; Tong, Y. Volatile Oil Concentration and Growth of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Plants Responded to Red to Blue Light Ratios. Technol. Hortic. 2023, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Belén Sabater-Jara, A.; Pina Funes, M.; Angeles Pedreño, M.; Belchí-Navarro, S. Essential Oils of Thymbra capitata and Thymus hyemalis and Their Uses Based on Their Bioactivity. In Thymus; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pancu, D.F.; Buzatu, R.; Milutinovici, R.; Iurciuc, S.; Dolghi, A.; Poenaru, M. Assessment of the Biological Activity of Thyme Essential Oil in the Presence of the Classic Antibiotic Tetracycline. Curr. Health Sci. J. 2022, 48, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Sateriale, D.; Forgione, G.; De Cristofaro, G.A.; Pagliuca, C.; Colicchio, R.; Salvatore, P.; Paolucci, M.; Pagliarulo, C. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Essential Oil against Foodborne Illness Pathogens, Salmonella enterica Subsp. enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Bacillus cereus. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Warman, D.J.; Jia, H.; Kato, H. Effects of Thyme (Thymus Vulgaris L.) Essential Oil on Aging-Induced Brain Inflammation and Blood Telomere Attrition in Chronologically Aged C57BL/6J Mice. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Oubihi, A.; Ballaoui, F.Z.; Imtara, H.; Jaber, H.; Ettouil, A.; Haida, S.; Ouhssine, M.; Noman, O.M.; Mothana, R.A.; Tarayrah, M.; et al. Phytochemical Compounds, Acute Toxicity, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities of Thymus leptobotrys Murb Essential Oil. Molecules 2023, 28, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rostami, R.; Eslamifar, Z.; Nazemi, S.; Hosseini, S.Z.; Behvandi, M.M.; Jafaripour, L. The Effect of Thyme Essential Oil on Liver Injuries Caused by Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion in Rats. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 2988334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Arancibia, M.; Iler-Iler, D.; Moreno-Toasa, G.; Rodríguez-Maecker, R.; Arancibia, M.; Iler-Iler, D.; Moreno-Toasa, G.; Rodríguez-Maecker, R. Thyme and Rosemary Essential Oils as an Alternative Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes. Management 2017, 256, 2166–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Akkucuk, S.; Om, K. Can the Thyme Oil Be an Alternative Treatment for Human Demodicosis? Res. Sq. 2022, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Noma, Y.; Asakawa, Y. Biotransformation of Monoterpenoids. Compr. Nat. Prod. II Chem. Biol. 2010, 3, 669–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Phillips, M.; Gibbs, H.D. A Synthesis of Thymol from P-Cymene. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1920, 12, 733–734. [Google Scholar]
  65. Niederl, J.B.; Natelson, S. The Synthesis of Thymol, Chlorothymol and Homologs of Thymol by the Intramolecular Rearrangement of Meta-Cresyl Ethers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar]
  66. Acevedo, M.D.; Bedogni, G.A.; Okulik, N.B.; Padró, C.L. Study of Gas Phase M-Cresol Alkylation with Methanol on Solid Acid Catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2014, 144, 1946–1954. [Google Scholar]
  67. Biedermann, W.; Koller, H.; Wedemeyer, K. Process for Preparing Thymol. U.S. Patent US4086283A, 2 June 1976. [Google Scholar]
  68. Grabowska, H.; Syper, L.; Zawadzki, M. Vapour Phase Alkylation of Ortho-, Meta- and Para-Cresols with Isopropyl Alcohol in the Presence of Sol–Gel Prepared Alumina Catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2004, 277, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ali, A.A.; Gaikar, V.G. Microwave-Assisted Process Intensification of Synthesis of Thymol Using Carbonized Sulfonic Acidic Resin (CSA) Catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 6543–6555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mesbah, M.; Soltanali, S.; Bahranifard, Z.; Hosseinzadeh, A.; Karami, H. Production of Thymol from Alkylation of M-Cresol with Isopropanol over ZSM-5 Catalysts: Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Modelling. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2023, 100, 100882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pawar, K.; Sankpal, P.; Patil, S.; Patil, P.; Pawar, A.; Shinde, P. Applications of GC-MS Used in Herbal Plants. Asian J. Pharm. Anal. 2022, 12, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Stashenko, E.; Ren, J. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. In Advances in Gas Chromatography; InTech: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Berkov, S.; Denev, R.; Sidjimova, B.; Zarev, Y.; Shkondrov, A.; Torras-Claveria, L.; Viladomat, F.; Bastida, J. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry of Some Homolycorine-type Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2023, 37, e9506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Reuhs, B.L. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Heinz, E. Chromatographic Processes. In High Performance Liquid Chromatography; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  76. Kulkarni, A.; Nasreen, J.; Seema, N. GC-MS, FT-IR and NMR Spectroscopy Analysis for Metabolome Profiling of Thyme Oil. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2013, 6, 945–949. [Google Scholar]
  77. ISO 19817:2017; Essential Oil of Thyme [Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymus zygis L.], Thymol Type. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  78. 10,000 (01/2023); European Pharmacopoeia 11.0. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2023.
  79. Trendafilova, A.; Todorova, M.; Ivanova, V.; Zhelev, P.; Aneva, I. Essential Oil Composition of Ten Species from Sect. Serpyllum of Genus Thymus Growing in Bulgaria. Diversity 2023, 15, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Aksit, H.; Bayar, Y.; Simsek, S.; Ulutas, Y. Chemical Composition and Antifungal Activities of the Essential Oils of Thymus Species (Thymus pectinatus, Thymus convolutus, Thymus vulgaris) against Plant Pathogens. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2022, 25, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kiliç, Ö.; Özdemir, F.A. Essential Oil Composition of Two Thymus kotschyanus Boiss. varietes from Elazığ. Progr. Nutr. 2017, 19, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  82. Hanoglu, A.; Hanoglu, D.Y.; Demirci, B.; Yavuz, D.Ö. Chemical Composition of Essential Oil of the Aerial Parts of Wild Growing Thymus capitatus (L.) Hoffm. & Link Species Collected from Three Different Locations in Northern Cyprus. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2017, 20, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pluhár, Z.; Sárosi, S.; Pintér, A.; Simkó, H. Essential Oil Polymorphism of Wild Growing Hungarian Thyme (Thymus pannonicus) Populations in the Carpathian Basin. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1681–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jurevičiūtė, R.; Ložienė, K.; Bruno, M.; Maggio, A.; Rosselli, S. Composition of Essential Oil of Lemon Thyme (Thymus × Citriodorus) at Different Hydrodistillation Times. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kim, M.; Sowndhararajan, K.; Deepa, P.; Kim, S. Variations in the Chemical Composition of Essential Oils in Native Populations of Korean Thyme, Thymus quinquecostatus Celak. Molecules 2022, 27, 7203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kosakowska, O.; Bączek, K.; Przybył, J.L.; Pawełczak, A.; Rolewska, K.; Węglarz, Z. Morphological and Chemical Traits as Quality Determinants of Common Thyme (Thymus culgaris L.), on the Example of ‘Standard Winter’ Cultivar. Agronomy 2020, 10, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Antonio Llorens-Molina, J.; Vacas, S.; Burgals Royo, E.; Pilar Santamarina Siurana, M.; Verdeguer Sancho, M. Chemodiversity of Wild Populations of Aromatic Plants as Source of Valuable Essential Oil Profiles. A Study on Thymus culgaris L. from Valencia (Spain). Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2020, 7, 29–50. [Google Scholar]
  88. Pérez-Sánchez, R.; Ubera, J.L.; Lafont, F.; Gálvez, C. Composition and Variability of the Essential Oil in Thymus zygis from Southern Spain. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2008, 20, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bigdeloo, M.; Hadian, J.; Nazeri, V. Composition of Essential Oil Compounds from Different Populations of Thymus caramanicus Jalas. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2017, 7, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yousefzadeh, K.; Houshmand, S.; Shiran, B.; Mousavi-Fard, S.; Zeinali, H.; Nikoloudakis, N.; Gheisari, M.M.; Fanourakis, D. Joint Effects of Developmental Stage and Water Deficit on Essential Oil Traits (Content, Yield, Composition) and Related Gene Expression: A Case Study in Two Thymus Species. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mumivand, H.; Shayganfar, A.; Hasanvand, F.; Maggi, F.; Alizadeh, A.; Darvishnia, M. Antimicrobial Activity and Chemical Composition of Essential Oil from Thymus daenensis and Thymus fedtschenkoi during Phenological Stages. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2021, 24, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shiyab, S.; Shatnawi, M.; Shibli, R.; Alzweiri, M. Influence of Developmental Stage on Yield and Composition of Origanum syriacum L. Oil by Multivariate Analysis. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 2985–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Touhami, A.; Chefrour, A.; Khellaf, N.; Bukhari, A.; Fadel, I. Phytochemical Characterization of the Essential Oils Obtained from Mediterranean Thymus spp. (Lamiacea) Harvested at Different Stages of Growth. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017, 5, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Moisa, C.; Lupitu, A.; Pop, G.; Rodica Chambre, D.; Copolovici, L.; Cioca, G.; Bungau, S.; Maria Copolovici, D. Variation of the Chemical Composition of Thymus culgaris Essential Oils by Phenological Stages. Rev. Chim. 2019, 70, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Toncer, O.; Karaman, S.; Diraz, E.; Sogut, T.; Kizil, S. Essential Oil Composition of Thymus × Citriodorus (Pers.) Schreb. at Different Harvest Stages. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 2017, 45, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Llorens-Molina, J.A.; Vacas, S.; Escrivá, N.; Verdeguer, M. Seasonal Variation of Thymus piperella L. Essential Oil Composition. Relationship among γ-Terpinene, p-Cymene and Carvacrol. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2022, 34, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Golparvar, A.R. Effects of Phonological Stages on Quality and Quantity of Essential Oil in Kermanian (Thymus caramanius Jalas). Electron. J. Biol. 2011, 7, 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  98. Omidbaigi, R.; Sefidkon, F.; Hejazi, M. Essential Oil Composition of Thymus* citriodorus L. Cultivated in Iran. Flavour. Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 237–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chbel, A.; Elmakssoudi, A.; Rey-Méndez, M.; Barja, J.L.; Filali, O.A.; Soukri, A.; Khalfi, B.E. Comparative Study of Essential Oil Composition, Anti-Bacterial and Antioxidant Activities of the Aerial Parts of Thymus vulgaris Grown in Morocco and France. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2022, 25, 380–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Satyal, P.; Murray, B.L.; McFeeters, R.L.; Setzer, W.N. Essential Oil Characterization of Thymus vulgaris from Various Geographical Locations. Foods 2016, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Llorens-Molina, J.A.; Vacas, S. Effect of Drought Stress on Essential Oil Composition of Thymus vulgaris L. (Chemotype 1, 8-Cineole) from Wild Populations of Eastern Iberian Peninsula. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2017, 29, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Alavi-Samani, S.M.; Kachouei, M.A.; Pirbalouti, A.G. Growth, Yield, Chemical Composition, and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Two Thyme Species under Foliar Application of Jasmonic Acid and Water Deficit Conditions. Hortic Env. Biotechnol. 2015, 56, 411–420. [Google Scholar]
  103. Razavizadeh, R.; Farahzadianpoor, F.; Adabavazeh, F.; Komatsu, S. Physiological and Morphological Analyses of Thymus vulgaris L. In Vitro Cultures under Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Induced Osmotic Stress. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. -Plant 2019, 55, 342–357. [Google Scholar]
  104. Bistgani, Z.E.; Hashemi, M.; DaCosta, M.; Craker, L.; Maggi, F.; Morshedloo, M.R. Effect of Salinity Stress on the Physiological Characteristics, Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymus daenensis Celak. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 135, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Razavizadeh, R.; Mohagheghiyan, N. An Investigation of Changes in Antioxidant Enzymes Activities and Secondary Metabolites of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris) Seedlings under In Vitro Salt Stress. J. Plant Biol. Sci. 2015, 7, 41–58. [Google Scholar]
  106. Hosseini, H.; Mousavi-Fard, S.; Fatehi, F.; Qaderi, A. Changes in Phytochemical and Morpho-Physilogical Traits of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris CV Varico 3) under Different Salinity Levels. J. Med. Plants 2017, 16, 22–33. [Google Scholar]
  107. Belaqziz, R.; Romane, A.; Abbad, A. Salt Stress Effects on Germination, Growth and Essential Oil Content of an Endemic Thyme Species in Morocco (Thymus maroccanus Ball.). J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2009, 5, 858–863. [Google Scholar]
  108. Manukyan, A. Secondary Metabolites and Their Antioxidant Capacity of Caucasian Endemic Thyme (Thymus transcaucasicus Ronn.) as Affected by Environmental Stress. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2019, 13, 100209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Habibi, S.; Qaderi, A.; Fatehi, F. The Study of Relative Expression of Key Genes of Thymol Biosynthesis Pathway in Thymus vulgaris Cv. ‘Varico 3’ under Cold Stress Using Real-Time PCR. J. Med. Plants 2017, 16, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  110. Salgado, A.P.S.P.; das Graças Cardoso, M.; de CASTRO, E.M.; Machado, S.M.F.; de Lima Guimarães, L.G.; Andrade, M.A.; Passos, L.O. Caracterização Química e Anatômica de Folhas de Tomilho Provenientes de Plantas Submetidas a Diferentes Condições Luminosas. Biosci. J. 2012, 28, 929–937. [Google Scholar]
  111. Lalević, D.; Ilić, Z.S.; Stanojević, L.; Milenković, L.; Šunić, L.; Kovač, R.; Kovačević, D.; Danilović, B.; Milenković, A.; Stanojević, J.; et al. Shade-Induced Effects on Essential Oil Yield, Chemical Profiling, and Biological Activity in Some Lamiaceae Plants Cultivated in Serbia. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kulbat, K.; Leszczyńska, J. Antioxidants as a Defensive Shield in Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Grown on the Soil Contaminated with Heavy Metals. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2016, 80, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Figas, A.; Tomaszewska-Sowa, M.; Kobierski, M.; Sawilska, A.K.; Klimkowska, K. Hazard of Contamination with Heavy Metals in Thymus serpyllum L. Herbs from Rural Areas. Agriculture 2021, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Karagözoğlu, Y.; Kıran, R.; Kıran, T.R. Investigation of Heavy Metal Contents in Thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Sold in Bingöl Herbalists. Middle Black Sea J. Health Sci. 2023, 9, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Vaičiulytė, V.; Ložienė, K.; Taraškevičius, R. Impact of Edaphic and Climatic Factors on Thymus pulegioides Essential Oil Composition and Potential Prevalence of Chemotypes. Plants 2022, 11, 2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Noroozisharaf, A.; Kaviani, M. Effect of Soil Application of Humic Acid on Nutrients Uptake, Essential Oil and Chemical Compositions of Garden Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) under Greenhouse Conditions. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2018, 24, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  117. Amiri, F.; Aminzadeh, M.; Abadi, E.A.; Mahdevi, K.; Fadai, S. Factors Affecting on Essential Chemical Composition of Thymus kotschyanus in Iran. World Appl. Sci. J. 2010, 8, 847–856. [Google Scholar]
  118. Pluhár, Z.; Héthelyi, É.; Kutta, G.; Kamondy, L. Evaluation of Environmental Factors Influencing Essential Oil Quality of Thymus pannonicus All. and Thymus praecox Opiz. J. Herbs. Spices Med. Plants 2007, 13, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Amani Machiani, M.; Javanmard, A.; Ostadi, A.; Alizadeh, K. Improvement in Essential Oil Quantity and Quality of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) by Integrative Application of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi under Water Stress Conditions. Plants 2023, 12, 1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Pouramini, P.; Fotokian, M.H.; Dehghan, H.; Hensel, G. Effect of Thiobacillus and Superabsorbent on Essential Oil Components in Thyme Species. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2019, 22, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Abdel-Hamid, M.S.; Fouda, A.; El-Ela, H.K.A.; El-Ghamry, A.A.; Hassan, S.E.D. Plant Growth-Promoting Properties of Bacterial Endophytes Isolated from Roots of Thymus vulgaris L. and Investigate Their Role as Biofertilizers to Enhance the Essential Oil Contents. Biomol. Concepts 2021, 12, 175–196. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. MalekMaleki, F.; Abbasi, N.; Sharifi Ashourabadi, E.; Zare, M.J.; Barary, M. Investigating the Effect of Plant Density on Biochemical Characteristics and Essential Oil in Wild Thyme (Thymbra spicata L.). Plant Prod. 2021, 44, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kizil, S.; Tonçer, Ö. Effect of Different Planting Densities on Yield and Yield Components of Wild Thyme (Thymbra Spicatavar. spicata). Acta Agron. Hung. 2006, 53, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Punetha, A.; Chauhan, A.; Kumar, D.; KT, V.; Upadhyay, R.K.; Padalia, R.C. Productivity and Essential Oil Quality of Himalayan Thyme (Thymus linearis Benth.) in Relation to Plant Densities and Drying Methods. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2022, 34, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zrig, A.; Tounekti, T.; AbdElgawad, H.; Hegab, M.M.; Ali, S.O.; Khemira, H. Essential Oils, Amino Acids and Polyphenols Changes in Salt-Stressed Thymus vulgaris Exposed to Open–Field and Shade Enclosure. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 91, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zrig, A.; Ferreira, J.F.S.; Hamouda, F.; Tounekti, T.; Selim, S.; Al Jaouni, S.; Khemira, H.; Abdelgawad, H. The Impact of Foliar Fertilizers on Growth and Biochemical Responses of Thymus vulgaris to Salinity Stress. Arid Land Res. Manag. 2019, 33, 297–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Milenković, L.; Ilić, Z.S.; Šunić, L.; Tmušić, N.; Stanojević, L.; Stanojević, J.; Cvetković, D. Modification of Light Intensity Influence Essential Oils Content, Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Thyme, Marjoram and Oregano. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 6532–6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Farahani, H.A.; Valadabadi, S.A.; Daneshian, J.; Khalvati, M.A. Evaluation Changing of Essential Oil of Balm (Melissa officinalis L.) under Water Deficit Stress Conditions. J. Med. Plants Res. 2009, 3, 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  129. Akachoud, O.; Bouamama, H.; Facon, N.; Laruelle, F.; Zoubi, B.; Benkebboura, A.; Ghoulam, C.; Qaddoury, A.; Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A. Mycorrhizal Inoculation Improves the Quality and Productivity of Essential Oil Distilled from Three Aromatic and Medicinal Plants: Thymus satureioides, Thymus pallidus, and Lavandula dentata. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sadowska, U.; Kopeć, A.; Kourimska, L.; Zarubova, L.; Kloucek, P. The Effect of Drying Methods on the Concentration of Compounds in Sage and Thyme. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e13286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Calín-Sánchez, Á.; Figiel, A.; Lech, K.; Szumny, A.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A. Effects of Drying Methods on the Composition of Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Essential Oil. Dry. Technol. 2013, 31, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Usai, M.; Marchetti, M.; Foddai, M.; Del Caro, A.; Desogus, R.; Sanna, I.; Piga, A. Influence of Different Stabilizing Operations and Storage Time on the Composition of Essential Oil of Thyme (Thymus officinalis L.) and Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.). LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sárosi, S.; Sipos, L.; Kókai, Z.; Pluhár, Z.; Szilvássy, B.; Novák, I. Effect of Different Drying Techniques on the Aroma Profile of Thymus vulgaris Analyzed by GC–MS and Sensory Profile Methods. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2013, 46, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wesolowska, A.; Grzeszczuk, M.; Jadczak, D. Comparison of the Chemical Composition of Essential Oils Isolated by Water-Steam Distillation and Hydrodistillation from Garden Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2016, 19, 832–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Khokhlov, Y.S.; Fedotova, I.A.; Shevchuk, O.M. Changes in the Component Composition of Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oil Depending on the Method of Distillation. Plant Biol. Hortic. Theory Innov. 2020, 0, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sadjia, B.; Naima, S.; Chahrazed, B. Extraction of Thyme (Thymus pallecens de Noé) Essential Oil by Steam-Distillation, Steam-Diffusion and Hydro-Distillation Processes: Optimization of Operating Conditions and Antioxidant Activity. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2012, 15, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Basniwal, P.K.; Shrivastava, P.K.; Dubey, R.; Jain, D. Supercritical Fluid Extraction: A New Milestone in Extraction Technology. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 67, 532–539. [Google Scholar]
  138. Oszagyan, M.; Simandi, B.; Sawinsky, J.; Kery, A.; Lemberkovics, E.; Fekete, J. Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Volatile Compounds from Lavandin and Thyme. Flavour. Fragr. J. 1996, 11, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kutta, G.; Pluhár, Z.; Sárosi, S. Yield and Composition of Supercritical Fluid Extracts of Different Lamiaceae Herbs. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. 2007, 13, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Díaz-Maroto Hidalgo, I.J.; Sánchez-Palomo, E.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Volatile Components and Key Odorants of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) and Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) Oil Extracts Obtained by Simultaneous Distillation−Extraction and Supercritical Fluid Extraction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 5385–5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Vas, G.; Vékey, K. Solid-phase Microextraction: A Powerful Sample Preparation Tool Prior to Mass Spectrometric Analysis. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 39, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Sárosi, S.; Ruff, J. Optimization of Solid Phase Microextraction Conditions for Analysis of Garden Thyme Volatile Compounds. Kertgazdasag 2013, 45, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  143. András, C.; Salamon, B.; György, É.; Mihok, E.; Szép, A. Essential Oil Extraction from Herbs and Their Use in the Food Industry. Acta Agrar. Debreceniensis 2018, 150, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Gedikoğlu, A.; Sökmen, M.; Çivit, A. Evaluation of Thymus vulgaris and Thymbra spicata Essential Oils and Plant Extracts for Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1704–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Trong, L.V.; Thinh, B.B. Changes in Essential Oil Composition of Thymus vulgaris under Different Storage Conditions and Its Antimicrobial Activity. Proceedings of Universities. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 2023, 13, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Mohammadian Yasuj, S.F.; Najafian, S.; Hosseinifarahi, M. Investigating the Storage Conditions of the Essential Oil Compounds of Garden Thyme. J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2023, 13, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Rowshan, V.; Bahmanzadegan, A.; Saharkhiz, M.J. Influence of Storage Conditions on the Essential Oil Composition of Thymus daenensis Celak. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 49, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram followed for the literature search.
Figure 1. PRISMA diagram followed for the literature search.
Plants 13 01375 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the most important terpenes found among the genus of Thymus (After Stahl-Biskup [42]).
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the most important terpenes found among the genus of Thymus (After Stahl-Biskup [42]).
Plants 13 01375 g002
Figure 3. Average percentage (%) of the main components in the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris among the defined groups from the Cluster Analysis. Different letters within the same component indicate a significant difference between the group clusters, as determined by the Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05) (After Llorens-Molina et al., 2020) [87].
Figure 3. Average percentage (%) of the main components in the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris among the defined groups from the Cluster Analysis. Different letters within the same component indicate a significant difference between the group clusters, as determined by the Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05) (After Llorens-Molina et al., 2020) [87].
Plants 13 01375 g003
Table 1. Chromatographic profile standards of the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris and Thymus zygis (thymol type) as mentioned in ISO 19817:2017 [77] and in Ph. Eur. 11.0, 10,000 (01/2023) [78].
Table 1. Chromatographic profile standards of the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris and Thymus zygis (thymol type) as mentioned in ISO 19817:2017 [77] and in Ph. Eur. 11.0, 10,000 (01/2023) [78].
ISO 19817:2017Ph. Eur. 11.0, 10,000 (01/2023)
ComponentMinimum (%)Maximum (%)Minimum (%)Maximum (%)
α-Thujene0.501.500.201.50
α-Pinene0.502.50nsns
β-Myrcene1.002.801.003.00
α-Terpinene0.902.600.902.60
γ-Terpinene4.0013.004.0012.00
p-Cymene14.0028.0014.0028.00
Linalool0.506.501.506.50
Terpinen-4-ol0.102.500.102.50
Thymol35.0055.0037.0055.00
Carvacrol0.505.500.505.50
β-Caryophyllene0.504.00nsns
trans-Sabinene hydrate<0.010.50nsns
Carvacrol methyl ether0.101.500.051.50
ns: not specified.
Table 2. Effect of abiotic and biotic factors on essential oil composition (%) of thyme species.
Table 2. Effect of abiotic and biotic factors on essential oil composition (%) of thyme species.
FactorReferenceThyme spp.Treatmentα-Thujene (%)α-Pinene (%)Camphene (%)p-cymene (%)1,8-Cineole (%)α-Terpinene (%)γ-Terpinene (%)Linalool (%)Borneol (%)α-Terpineol (%)Thymol (%)Carvacrol (%)β-Caryophyllene (%)
Drought[103]T. vulgarisCalus control1.702.203.007.701.401.5014.201.201.801.0013.2013.507.20
Callus Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)2.001.605.1010.801.601.1019.301.102.101.309.809.603.10
[102]T. vulgaris T. daenensisNormal irrigation1.081.32 9.921.341.9511.33 2.00 51.993.802.37
Slight drought irrigation1.101.17 11.791.192.0512.66 2.35 41.464.772.71
Salt[125]T. vulgarisControl12.096.6712.67 0.010.062.8912.370.16 15.093.132.77
150 mM NaCl4.156.0617.35 0.050.084.7516.450.38 20.064.484.10
[126]T. vulgarisControl 1.702.206.2015.10 1.1022.105.70 29.403.402.40
100 mM NaCl 2.041.523.808.70 0.3024.2010.90 32.701.101.70
Light[127]T. vulgarisUnshade (Open field condition)0.180.120.072.800.050.453.490.320.230.068.050.650.27
40% shade0.280.170.073.600.030.554.040.210.190.039.350.730.33
Temperature[108]T. transcaucasicus15 °C 1.82 1.147.100.880.066.3411.7017.3711.1818.050.02
25 °C 1.99 0.913.340.470.033.5925.3133.778.545.460.17
Humidity[108]T. transcaucasicus50% 1.98 0.571.040.081.816.5942.0514.572.6014.470.40
90% 2.98 1.041.100.273.337.6430.6515.823.1212.310.16
Humic acid[116]T. vulgarisControl0.230.250.233.460.580.352.241.733.120.1773.086.18
100 gm−20.260.270.254.240.530.482.401.583.420.1274.156.20
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF)[129]T. satureioidesControl 2.060.65 8.47 1.675.93 16.5518.502.26
AMF+ 1.270.46 8.37 1.6216.73 16.756.052.57
[119]T. vulgarisControl1.661.210.8816.353.021.2213.112.060.800.0735.642.943.23
AMF+1.340.560.6516.723.151.1812.832.090.700.0538.742.993.55
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPB)[121]T. vulgarisControl2.930.84 8.3823.29 4.9529.85
PGPB+3.491.00 7.4222.20 1.6433.31
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Etri, K.; Pluhár, Z. Exploring Chemical Variability in the Essential Oils of the Thymus Genus. Plants 2024, 13, 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101375

AMA Style

Etri K, Pluhár Z. Exploring Chemical Variability in the Essential Oils of the Thymus Genus. Plants. 2024; 13(10):1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Etri, Karim, and Zsuzsanna Pluhár. 2024. "Exploring Chemical Variability in the Essential Oils of the Thymus Genus" Plants 13, no. 10: 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13101375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop