Next Article in Journal
Atherosclerosis in Patients with Congenital Hemophilia: A Focus on Peripheral Artery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
History of Pica, Obesity, and Their Associations with Anemia in Pregnancy: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/life13112219
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geographical Variation in Body Size in the Asian Common Toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus)

by
Kunhao Zhang
1,2,
Duojing Qiu
1,2,
Li Zhao
1,2,
Chengzhi Yan
1,2,
Long Jin
1,2,* and
Wenbo Liao
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, China
2
Key Laboratory of Artificial Propagation and Utilization in Anurans of Nanchong City, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2023, 13(11), 2219; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112219
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Revised: 10 November 2023 / Accepted: 15 November 2023 / Published: 17 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Ecology, Management and Conservation of Vertebrates)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The geographic variation in life-history traits of organisms and the mechanisms underlying adaptation are interesting ideas in evolutionary biology. This study investigated age and body size of the Asian common toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus) among five populations along a geographical gradient. We found that geographical variation in age was non-significant among populations but there was a significant and positive correlation between mean age and body size. Although the body size values at 1043 m are quite different from other sites, after controlling for age effects, there was a significant positive correlation between altitude and body size. Our findings followed the predictions of Bergmann’s rule, suggesting that the body size of D. melanostictus is potentially influenced by the low air temperatures at higher altitudes.

1. Introduction

The environmental factors temperature and rainfall are two important selective forces that lead to geographic variation in morphological, physiological and life-history characteristics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Especially, temperature is a key factor that leads to geographic variation in age and body size in animals because the responses to environmental temperature along geographic gradients are likely influenced not only by energy storage but also by food intake [13,20,21]. In addition, body size variation across populations is regarded as an outcome of sexual and natural selection [22,23,24]. By contrast, larger body size in females arises as a result of the strong fecundity selection where increased reproductive investment favors large females [25,26].
Body size is an important life-history trait that affects the success of ecological interactions and, ultimately, reproductive fitness [27,28]. Body size variation results from changing growth rates, shifting age structure or a combination of the two, which affects population-, community- and ecosystem-level dynamics [29,30]. There is evidence that a small body disadvantages males attempting to obtain a mate during the competitive interactions within a species [31,32]. In the meantime, a substantial reduction in body size results in populations that exhibit heightened vulnerability to collapse, as diminished body size significantly declines both fecundity and survival within the natural environment [33].
Because there are significant changes in body size across temporal and spatial scales, extensive studies have been conducted to identify factors contributing to body size variation, with a particular focus on environmental temperature [18,19,20,27]. Indeed, temperature affects metabolism, which has an effect on body size through its influence on energy allocation to growth, activity and reproduction in organisms [34]. In terms of geographic variation in body size, Bergmann’s rule states that a larger size is often obtained in colder temperatures than in warmer temperatures within or among species. Bergmann’s rule has been largely supported in homeothermic species. These patterns hold true in endotherms based on a positive correlation between basal metabolic rate and body mass [35]. In particular, the explanation for Bergmann’s rule is that larger-bodied animals possess a smaller surface-to-volume ratio, where heat conservation is more effective [36]. However, larger individuals tend to lose more energy to the environment than smaller individuals which obey the generality of Bergmann’s rule [37]. Numerous researchers have used different animal groups to test this hypothesis, and some results showed that some endothermic animals follow Bergmann’s rule [38,39,40,41,42,43] while others follow the inverse of Bergmann’s rule [44,45,46].
Anurans, as an ideal model, were used for studying geographic variation in body size because body temperature depends tightly on environmental temperature [29]. There is evidence for intra-specific studies on the effect of temperature on body size in frogs [27,46]. However, there is much controversy on how environmental temperature influences variation in body size in frogs. For instance, species living at lower temperatures in high altitude and/or latitude areas have larger body sizes compared to those living at high temperatures in low altitude and/or latitude areas, following Bergmann’s rule [27,47,48], while other species contrast this [13,49]. Moreover, age, as one of the basic life-history traits, affects body size variation in an organism. Usually, organisms under harsh environments will allocate more energy and time into growth, so that individuals become older and have larger bodies [39,50,51]. Indeed, most species display positive correlations between age and body size [13,42].
The Asian common toad (D. melanostictus ) is one of the most prevalent anurans in Asia [52]. This species grows and breeds in various habitats, including marshes, puddles, man-made ponds and temporary ponds, providing it an ideal model for studying body size variation. Its most distinctive feature lie in the black bony spines protruding from its snout. With strong adaptability, this species can thrive across a range of altitudes from 10 to 2000 m and breeds between March and August [53]. Here, we investigated patterns of variation in age and body size in D. melanostictus among five populations along a geographical gradient. Altitude or latitude have different connotations, where altitude has elevation shifts leading to not only temperature shifts but also exposure to sun and oxygen, and latitude shifts may be more related to length of day and temperature [54,55,56,57]. We first examined the difference in age across altitudes or latitudes. We then explored the relationships between body size and altitude or latitude among populations when controlling the age effect to verify whether Bergmann’s rule applies to this species, and we predicted an increase in body size with increasing altitude or latitude in the species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Species

The Asian common toad is a medium-sized anuran, with the female having a larger body size than males. The toad is widely distributed in southern China where they live in holes in the ground during the day and forage for insects at night [58]. It is a lekking species, where males actively wait for females for mating in pools during the night in breeding season. Upon the females’ arrival at the breeding pools, males can promptly approach and engage in clasping behavior [52]. The females usually lay a larger number of eggs, ranging from 2500 to 4000 eggs in the spawning site. There are some poison glands on the dorsum skin in this species which can be used to avoid predators such as snakes [53].

2.2. Sample Site

Fieldwork was conducted from April to August between 2018 and 2020. We studied five D. melanostictus populations including Midu, Mouding and Pingbian from the Yunnan province, Yuanling from the Hunan province and Pingjiang from the Guizhou province. These study sites significantly display variations in altitude, mean temperature and mean precipitation [52]. The three sites in Yunan included Midu at an altitude of 1673 m, Mouding at an altitude of 1771 m and Pingbian at an altitude of 1043 m [52]. The vegetations at these three sites were characterized by Taxus chinensis, Anoectochilus pingbianensis, Rhododendron platyphyllum, Cheirostylis pingbianensis, Rungia pinpienensis, and Ophiorrhiza pingbienensis. The Pingjiang population was found along some paddy fields at an altitude of 275 m. The sampling area was about 100 m long and 60 m wide. The vegetation at this site was characterized by Begonia rongjiangensis and Alsophila spinulosa. For the Yuanling population, the paddy fields were located an altitude of 275 m and we found Cephalotaxus oliveri, T. chinensis and Manglietia patungensis in the area.

2.3. Sample Collection

We randomly captured 116 males and 37 females along sampling lines (length 500 m; width 10 m) at night using flashlight illumination during the breeding season from five populations (Table 1). The toad museum number information at different collecting sites is shown in Supplementary Materials Table S1. We diagnosed the toad as D. melanostictus on the basis of their morphological characteristics and body color [53]. We identified their sex by their secondary sexual characteristics (e.g., eggs in females and nuptial pads in males [52]). We euthanized all specimens using single-pithing, and then preserved them in 4% phosphate-buffered formalin for tissue fixation. The toes were clipped after the specimens were euthanized. All individuals with a specific museum number were stored in a public natural history collection in China West Normal University. The specimens used in this study were collected with permission from the China West Normal University Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments (CWNU-20001).

2.4. Body Size Measurement

The body mass of each individual was measured using an electronic balance with an accuracy of 0.01 g. Then, we used the vernier caliper to measure snout-vent length (SVL) of each individual with an accuracy of 0.01 mm [58,59]. The measurements and records of each toad were measured twice by two persons for minimizing error. We clipped the longest phalanges of all individuals from the right hindlimb and then stored them in 4% neutral buffered formalin in order to determine age structure using skeletochronology [36].

2.5. Age Determination

The most commonly used method for determining the age of amphibians is skeletochronology [36,59,60,61,62,63,64]. We used the paraffin section method and Harris’s haematoxylin stain to obtain histological sections of the phalanges [65]. We first removed the skins and muscles of each digit, and washed the remaining bones in water for two hours. We then decalcified the bones in 5% nitric acid for 48 h. We washed the phalanges in running tap water for 24 h and stained them in Harris’s haematoxylin for 150 min. After that, we dehydrated the stained phalange through successive ethanol stages of 70%, 80%, 95% and 100% for approximately one hour, respectively. We embedded tissues in small paraffin blocks and cut these for phalanges. We then selected cross-sections of about 13 μm thickness with the smallest medullar cavity and mounted them on glass slides. The lines of arrested growths (LAGs) on a section were demonstrated to form in the bones from a cycle of growth and a period of dormancy during hibernation [36]. The number of rings thus relates directly to age, like the rings in trees. We counted LAGs under a light microscope and treated them as the age of the toads because the toads are exposed to distinct temperature cycles through the year. We regarded the first line of arrested growth as endosteal resorption on the basis of the kastschenko line (KL) where there was the interface between the periosteal and endosteal zones [36].
All individuals from the five populations had significant LAGs. Very closely spaced Harris’s haematoxylin lines (double LAGs) were not found for all individuals. False LAGs were observed in one individual, but did not affect the estimate of the age. We did not find endosteal resorption in the sections from males and females. The age of the toad ranged from 1 to 4 in males and 1 to 7 in females, respectively.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

We used the R package ‘lme4′ in the RStudio version 4.3.0 [66] to analyze the data. Since there was only one male individual in the Pingbian population, it was not considered in statistical analysis. Before analysis, we performed a log10 transformation on the SVL and body mass data to conform to the normality assumption. We first used GLMMs treating age as the dependent variable, altitude or latitude as a fixed factor, sex as a covariate and population as a random factor to analyze geographical variation in age [67]. We then used GLMMs with SVL and body mass as dependent variables, altitude or latitude as a fixed factor, age and sex as covariates, and population as a random factor to test the effect of altitude or latitude on body size variation.

3. Results

The number of female and male samples we collected in the five different populations are shown in the table above, which also reflects the mean values of male and female body size among different populations. In populations such as Midu and Pingjiang, where there were a certain number of males and females, the body size of males and females was almost the same. It was noteworthy that the body size of females at the Pingbian population was 72.82 mm, which significantly exceeded the values at other sites.

3.1. Geographical Variation in Age

The GLMMs showed that there was a non-significant difference in age among populations and between males and females (Table 2). Meanwhile, the GLMMs showed that the effects of altitude or latitude (Table 2) on age was non-significant (Table 2).

3.2. Geographical Variation in Body Size

The GLMMs revealed a positive effect of age on body size in D. melanostictus across populations (Table 3; Figure 1A,B). Therefore, we need control for age effect to analyze the geographical variation in SVL and body mass across populations. The GLMMs indicated that body size was significantly positively correlated with altitude, and the Pingbian population had the largest body size (Table 3; Figure 2A,B). However, there was a non-significant correlation between body size and latitude (Table 3). The interaction term with altitude and latitude on body size was non-significant (both p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

Our findings indicate non-significant variation in age across altitudes or latitudes and a positive effect of age on body size. In exploring the effects of different altitudes on the body size of D. melanostictus, we found that in populations with a certain number of females and males, the body size of males and females was almost the same. However, there were essentially only females at 1043 m and the body size of D. melanostictus at this site was significantly higher than at other higher altitudes. We found that the mean age of D. melanostictus at 1043 m was higher than at other higher altitudes and this may result in the body size of D. melanostictus at 1043 m being higher compared to at other higher altitudes. It was a clear outlier and we thought there was a positive effect of altitude on body size after controlling for the age effect, following Bergmann’s rule. This pattern suggests that low environmental temperature at high altitude results in larger body size across populations. In the following, we discuss our findings related to previous studies on age and body size variation across populations.
Skeletochronology can be widely used to determine the individual age of amphibians [65,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. We confirmed that skeletochronology can determine the age structure of D. melanostictus, although a false line was only found in one individual. In general, the mean age of individuals increases with altitude or latitude among populations in anurans [76,77]. The life-history hypothesis has suggested that high-altitude populations invest more energy in growth by delaying the age at sexual maturity [41]. Indeed, a previous study has found that the mean age of the Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi) at high altitudes and/or latitudes is significantly higher than that at low altitudes because the lower environmental temperature at high altitudes leads to later age at sexual maturity and longer lifespan [36]. In this study, there was a non-significant difference in the mean age of D. melanostictus at different altitudes or latitudes that was associated with the fact that the difference in length of the breeding season with different altitudes or latitudes was not obvious across populations. This is similar to the results which show that there is a non-significant difference in the mean age of the Andrew’s toad across altitudinal gradients [36].
Geographical variations in body size have been attractive to evolutionary ecologists because it is an important scientific problem in life-history strategy [27,77]. Life-history theory states that age can be an important contributing force to adult body size [38]. Variations in body size along environmental gradients in ectotherms were explored by focusing on Bergmann’s rule [78,79]. Hence, investigating body size variations associated with life-history traits can help understanding the proximate reason for geographic clines in body size. Age and growth rate are two basic life-history traits in animals under natural selection. Cold temperature and limited food availability at high latitudes and/or altitudes are expected to select for slower growth rates, delaying sexual maturity and longer longevity [36]. Consequently, individuals under harsh environments should allocate more time and energy into growth, so that they have larger body size [49]. Herein, although age did not vary consistently with altitude or latitude in the toad, high-altitude populations had larger body size than low-altitude populations. When controlling for age effect, altitudinal variation in body size followed Bergman’s rule, which was driven by population-level adaptation to different thermal environments. This pattern suggested that larger individuals can store more energy to adapt to the cold and highly variable environment so that they live longer and improve their survival rate in adversity. Our findings were consistent with previous studies on geographic variation in body size in some species of frogs conforming to Bergmann’s rule, which show that larger body size is observed in lower ambient temperatures, in addition to longer hibernation periods and shorter activity time at high altitude [36,49]. By contrast, some studies have shown that the body size of anurans species gradually decreases with increasing altitude or latitude [13,50,80].
A previous study has shown that body size of adults is associated with not only age, but also growth rate and size at the starting point of growth in a toad [36]. Indeed, the body size of anurans is known to be positively correlated with age, growth rate and lifespan [80]. There are three parameters (i.e., age, growth rate and lifespan) that mainly determine body size variation shifts along a geographic gradient, yet some anurans support Bergmann’s rule and others obey it. Usually, when selection favors the negative growth rate–longevity correlation for anurans living in contrasting conditions, the relative influences of the two elements associated with local environments determine the cline rule of a species [20,36]. For Bergmann’s rule, later age of maturity and longer lifespan play a more important role for increased body size than slower growth in declining it. On the contrary, any prolonged time taken for growth fails to compensate the influence of slow growth on body size, which will result in the converse of Bergmann’s rule. Indeed, the predominant influence of fast growth rate and long longevity on increased body size along altitudinal gradients exhibits Bergmann’s rule [20,36], whereas the influence of slower growth rate on reduced body size along geographical gradients follows the converse of Bergmann’s rule in Nanorana parkeri [53]. Our findings suggested that body size variation in D. melanostictus following Bergmann’s rule was likely to be the result of fast growth rates and long longevity in high-altitude populations.

5. Conclusions

Consistent with our prediction, our findings offer substantial evidence for the relationship between body size and altitude among populations following Bergmann’s rule. Our findings imply that individuals at high-altitude populations experiencing low temperature have later age at sexual maturity and longer lifespan, which promote the development of larger body size to meet reproductive demands. This pattern suggests that body size variation in D. melanostictus can be explained by Bergmann’s rule.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life13112219/s1, Table S1. The toad museum number information at different collecting sites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L.; methodology, K.Z. and D.Q.; formal analysis, K.Z., C.Y., D.Q. and L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Z., L.J. and W.L.; writing—review and editing, W.L.; visualization, L.J. and W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Foundation of China (32200338; 31970393), the Key Project of Natural Sciences Foundation of Sichuan Province (22NSFSC0011) and the Basic project of China West Normal University (19D046).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Sichuan and approved by Ethics Committee of China West Normal University. All the method of capturing and handling animals used in this study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at China West Normal University (2020001).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Liu, W., Mai C.L., Cheng, S.N. and Chen, C. for helping collect samplings in fieldwork.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ceballos, C.P.; Valenzuela, N. The role of sex-specific plasticity in shaping sexual dimorphism in a long-lived vertebrate, the snapping turtle Chelydra serpentina. Evol. Biol. 2011, 38, 163–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Angilletta, M.J.; Dunham, A.E. The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: Simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am. Nat. 2003, 162, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, X.T.; Liu, L.; Zhang, J.Y.; Ma, M.; Sun, L.S.; Li, X.F.; Zhang, H.Y.; Wang, J.B.; Huang, Y.Y.; Li, T.J. Improvement in the risk assessment of oral leukoplakia through morphology-related copy number analysis. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 379–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, Y.; Mai, C.L.; Liao, W.B.; Kotrschal, A. Body mass variation is negatively associated with brain size: Evidence for the fat-brain trade-off in anurans. Evolution 2020, 74, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Park, J.; Do, Y. Phenotypic plasticity in juvenile frogs that experienced predation pressure as tadpoles does not alter their locomotory performance. Biology 2023, 12, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Muñoz-Muñoz, F.; Pagès, N.; Durao, A.F.; England, M.; Werner, D.; Talavera, S. Narrow versus broad: Sexual dimorphism in the wing form of western European species of the subgenus Avaritia (Culicoides, Ceratopogonidae). Integr. Zool. 2021, 16, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scheun, J.; Neller, S.; Bennett, N.C.; Kemp, L.V.; Ganswindt, A. Endocrine correlates of gender and throat coloration in the southern ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri). Integr. Zool. 2021, 16, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Donihue, C.M.; Daltry, J.C.; Challenger, S.; Herrel, A. Population increase and changes in behavior and morphology in the critically endangered redonda ground lizard (Pholidoscelis atratus) following the successful removal of alien rats and goats. Integr. Zool. 2021, 16, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Giacomini, G.; Herrel, A.; Chaverri, G.; Brown, R.P.; Russo, D.; Scaravelli, D.; Meloro, C. Functional correlates of skull shape in Chiroptera: Feeding and echolocation adaptations. Integr. Zool. 2022, 17, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zamora-Camacho, F.J. Sex and habitat differences in size and coloration of an amphibian’s poison glands match differential predator pressures. Integr. Zool. 2022, 17, 764–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hinds, L.A.; Henry, S.; Van de Weyer, N.; Robinson, F.; Ruscoe, W.A.; Brown, P.R. Acute oral toxicity of zinc phosphide: An assessment for wild house mice (Mus musculus). Integr. Zool. 2023, 18, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jiang, Y.; Chen, C.; Liao, W.B. Anuran interorbital distance variation: The role of ecological and behavioral factors. Integr. Zool. 2022, 17, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Krasnov, B.R.; Surkova, E.N.; Shenbrot, G.I.; Khokhlova, I.S. Latitudinal gradients in body size and sexual size dimorphism in fleas: Males drive Bergmann’s pattern. Integr. Zool. 2023, 18, 414–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L.L.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liao, W.B. Inverse of Rensch’s rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in (Bufo andrewsi). Asian Herpetol. Res. 2023, 14, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Luan, X.F.; Liao, W.B. Testis size variation and its environmental correlates in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi). Animals 2022, 12, 3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, Y.; Luan, X.F.; Liao, W.B. Anuran brain size predicts food availability-driven population density. Sci. China Life Sci. 2022, 66, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lüpold, S.; Jin, L.; Liao, W.B. Population density and structure drive differential investment in pre-and postmating sexual traits in frogs. Evolution 2017, 71, 1686–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liao, W.B.; Jiang, Y.; Li, D.Y.; Jin, L.; Zhong, M.J.; Qi, Y.; Lüpold, S.; Kotrschal, A. Cognition contra camouflage: How the brain mediates predator-driven crypsis evolution. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabq1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.T.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, J.L.; Liao, W.B. Evolution of avian eye size is associated with habitat openness, food type and brain size. Animals 2023, 13, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bláha, M.; Patoka, J.; Japoshvili, B.; Let, M.; Buric, M.; Kouba, A.; Mpumladze, L. Genetic diversity, phylogenetic position and morphometric analysis of Astacus colchicus (Decapoda, Astacidae): A new insight into Eastern European crayfish fauna. Integr. Zool. 2021, 16, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, X.; Chen, C.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Jin, L. Geographical variation of organ size in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi). Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 10, 972942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peng, Z.W.; Zhang, L.X.; Lu, X. Global gaps in age data based on skeletochronology for amphibians. Integr. Zool. 2022, 17, 752–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Székely, T.; Reynolds, J.D.; Figuerola, J. Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls and alcids: The influence of sexual and natural selection. Evolution 2000, 54, 1404–1413. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Lu, X.; Li, B.; Liang, J.J. Comparative demography of a temperate anuran, (Rana chensinensis), along a relatively fine elevational gradient. Can. J. Zool. 2006, 84, 1789–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, H.; Sun, B.; Zhang, D. Phenotypic consequences of maternally selected nests: A cross-fostering experiment in a desert lizard. Integr. Zool. 2021, 16, 741–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kozłowski, J.; Czarnoleski, M.; Dańko, M. Can optimal resource allocation models explain why ectotherms grow larger in cold? Integr. Comp. Biol. 2004, 44, 480–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roff, D.A. Life History Evolution; Sunderland, M.A., Ed.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu, Y.S.; Sun, S.Y.; Fan, H.Z.; Zhou, W.L.; Wei, F.W. Exploring marine endosymbiosis systems with omics techniques. Sci. China Life Sci. 2021, 64, 1013–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oke, K.B.; Cunningham, C.J.; Westley, P.A.H.; Baskett, M.L.; Carlson, S.M.; Clark, J.; Hendry, A.P.; Karatayev, V.A.; Kendall, N.W.; Kibele, J.; et al. Recent declines in salmon body size impact ecosystems and fisheries. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Daufresne, M.; Lengfellner, K.; Sommer, U. Global warming benefits the small in aquatic ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12788–12793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brown, J.H.; Gillooly, J.F.; Allen, A.P.; Savage, V.M.; West, G.B. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 2004, 85, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peters, R.H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  33. Clements, C.F.; Ozgul, A. Including trait-based early warning signals helps predict population collapse. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. McPhee, M.; Leon, J.; Wilson, L.; Siegel, J.; Agler, B. Changing growth and maturity in Western Alaskan Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, brood years 1975–2005. N. Pac. Anadr. Fish Comm. Bull. 2016, 6, 307–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barneche, D.R.; White, C.R.; Marshall, D.J. Fish reproductive-energy output increases disproportionately with body size. Science 2018, 360, 642–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liao, W.B.; Lu, X. Adult body size = f (initial size + growth rate × age): Explaining the proximate cause of Bergman’s cline in a toad along altitudinal gradients. Evol. Ecol. 2012, 26, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  38. Atkinson, D.; Sibly, R.M. Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McNab, B.K. On the ecological significance of Bergmann’s rule. Ecology 1971, 52, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ashton, K.G. Do amphibians follow Bergmann’s rule? Can. J. Zool. 2002, 80, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Blackburn, T.M.; Gaston, K.J.; Loder, N. Geographic gradients in body size: A clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers. Distrib. 1999, 5, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gibson, D.; Hornsby, A.D.; Brown, M.B. Migratory shorebird adheres to Bergmann’s Rule by responding to environmental conditions through the annual lifecycle. Ecography 2019, 42, 1482–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Meiri, S.; Thomas, G.H. The geography of body size–challenges of the interspecific approach. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Torres-Romero, E.J.; Morales-Castilla, I.; Olalla-Tárraga, M.Á. Bergmann’s rule in the oceans? Temperature strongly correlates with global interspecific patterns of body size in marine mammals. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016, 25, 1206–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mousseau, T.A. Ectotherms follow the converse to Bergmann’s rule. Evolution 1997, 51, 630–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cvetković, D.; Tomašević, N.; Ficetola, G.F.; Crnobrnja-Isailović, J.; Miaud, C. Bergmann’s rule in amphibians: Combining demographic and ecological parameters to explain body size variation among populations in the common toad Bufo bufo. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2009, 47, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ashton, K.G.; Feldman, C.R. Bergmann’s rule in nonavian reptiles: Turtles follow it, lizards and snakes reverse it. Evolution 2003, 57, 1151–1163. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Laugen, A.T.; Laurila, A.; Jönsson, K.I.; Söderman, F.; Merilä, J. Do common frogs (Rana temporaria) follow Bergmann’s rule? Evol. Ecol. Res. 2005, 7, 717–731. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ma, X.; Tong, L.; Lu, X. Variation of body size, age structure and growth of a temperate frog, (Rana chensinensis), over an elevational gradient in northern China. Amphibia-Reptilia 2009, 30, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ma, X.; Lu, X.; Merilä, J. Altitudinal decline of body size in a Tibetan frog. J. Zool. 2009, 279, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ferretti, F.; Fattorini, N. Competitor densities, habitat, and weather: Effects on interspecific interactions between wild deer species. Integr. Zool. 2021, 16, 670–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fei, L.; Yei, C.Y.; Jiang, J.P. Colored Atlas of Chinese Amphibians and Their Distributions; Sichuan Science and Technology Press: Chengdu, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  53. Moore, M.; Francois, S.; Niaina, F.J.; Edmonds, D. The new toad in town: Distribution of the Asian toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus), in the Toamasina area of eastern Madagascar. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2015, 8, 440–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guo, C.; Xu, J.; Wang, M.; Yan, T.; Yang, L.; Sun, Z. Study on oxygen supply standard for physical health of construction personnel of high-altitude tunnels. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2015, 13, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Montgomery, K. Variation in temperature with altitude and latitude. J. Geogr. 2006, 105, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gates, D.M. Spectral distribution of solar radiation at the earth’s surface: The spectral quality of sunlight, skylight, and global radiation varies with atmospheric conditions. Science 1966, 151, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bradshaw, W.E.; Holzapfel, C.M. Genetic response to rapid climate change: It’s seasonal timing that matters. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Deng, W.Y.; Jin, L.; Qiu, D.J.; Yan, C.Z.; Liao, W.B. Geographic variation in organ size in a toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus). Animals 2023, 13, 2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Abouheif, E.; Fairbairn, D.J. A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Assessing Rensch’s rule. Am. Nat. 1997, 149, 540–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cox, R.M.; Skelly, S.L.; John-Alder, H.B. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Am. Nat. 2003, 57, 1653–1669. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sinsch, U. Review: Skeletochronological assessment of demographic life-history traits in amphibians. Herpetol. J. 2015, 25, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yuan, L.J.; Zhong, M.J.; Liao, W.B. Age structure of two species of odorous frogs (Odorrana margaretae and Odorrana grahami). Asian Herpetol. Res. 2021, 12, 308–314. [Google Scholar]
  63. Monnet, J.M.; Cherry, M.I. Sexual size dimorphism in anurans. Proc. R. Soc. B 2002, 269, 2301–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Herczeg, G.; Gonda, A.; Merilä, J. Rensch’s rule inverted—Female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius). J. Anim. Ecol. 2010, 79, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liao, W.B.; Liu, W.C.; Merilä, J. Andrew meets Rensch: Sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch’s rule in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi). Oecologia 2015, 177, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bates, D.; Maechler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Soft. 2015, 67, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Räsänen, K.; Söderman, F.; Laurila, A.; Merilä, J. Geographic variation in maternal investment: Acidity affects egg size and fecundity in Rana arvalis. Ecology 2008, 89, 2553–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Han, X.; Fu, J.Z. Does life history shape sexual size dimorphism in anurans? A comparative analysis. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Margenau, E.L.; Crayton, S.M.; Rucker, L.E.; Jacobsen, C.D.; Brown, D.J. Modified salamander stick to facilitate accurate measurement of small individuals. Herpetol. J. 2018, 49, 243–246. [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang, L.X.; Sheng, Y.S.; Yuan, X.Y.; Zhong, X.T.; Chen, X.H. A skeletochronological estimation of age structure of a population of the paddy frog, (Fejervarya multistriata), from the central east of China. Anim. Biol. 2020, 71, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Polák, J.; Frynta, D. Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in cattle breeds support Rensch’s rule. Evol. Ecol. 2010, 24, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baskale, E.; Ulubeli, S.A.; Kaska, Y. Age structures and growth parameters of the Levantine frog, Pelophylax bedriagae, at different localities in Denizli, Turkey. Acta Herpetol. 2018, 13, 147–154. [Google Scholar]
  73. Rozenblut, B.; Ogielska, M. Development and growth of long bones in European water frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae), with remarks on age determination. J. Morphol. 2005, 265, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stephenson, A.; Calvo-Friedman, A.; Altshuler, L.; Zabar, S.; Hanley, K. Educational training to improve opioid overdose response among health center staff: A quality improvement initiative. Harm Reduct. J. 2023, 20, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ergül, K.T.; Gümüşsoy, K. Age structure, growth, and body size of (Pelodytes caucasicus) from Turkey. Biol. Bull. 2022, 49, S124–S129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Remes, V.; Székely, T. Domestic chickens defy Rensch’s rule: Sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23, 2754–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wells, K.D. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  78. Jiang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Luan, X.F.; Liao, W.B. Geographical variation in body size and the Bergmann’s rule in Andrew’s toad (Bufo andrewsi). Biology 2022, 11, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sinsch, U.; Marangoni, F.; Oromı, N.; Leskovar, C.; Sanuy, D.; Tejedo, M. Proximate mechanisms deter-mining size variability in natterjack toads. J. Zool. 2010, 281, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Morrison, F.C.; Hero, J.M. Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: A review. J. Anim. Ecol. 2003, 72, 270–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 13 02219 g001
Figure 1. The relationship between age and SVL (A) and/or body mass (B) among Duttaphrynus melanostictus populations.
Figure 1. The relationship between age and SVL (A) and/or body mass (B) among Duttaphrynus melanostictus populations.
Life 13 02219 g001
Life 13 02219 g002
Figure 2. Mean of adult SVL (A) and body mass (B) changes with increasing altitude across Duttaphrynus melanostictus populations. Pingbian population displays the largest body size.
Figure 2. Mean of adult SVL (A) and body mass (B) changes with increasing altitude across Duttaphrynus melanostictus populations. Pingbian population displays the largest body size.
Life 13 02219 g002
Table 1. Sampling size (n), altitude, latitude and sex across populations in the Asian common toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus).
Table 1. Sampling size (n), altitude, latitude and sex across populations in the Asian common toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus).
Study SiteLatitude
(N)		Altitude
(m)		Male Body Size
(mm)		Female Body Size
(mm)
Midu25°20′167363.06 ± 5.26
(n = 33)		62.05 ± 4.34
(n = 12)
Mouding25°17′177161.46 ± 4.33
(n = 50)		n = 0
Pingjiang25°58′27652.56 ± 4.72
(n = 8)		53.59 ± 4.27
(n = 8)
Pingbian22°59′104347.70
(n = 1)		72.82 ± 5.08
(n = 17)
Yuanling28°26′12051.38 ± 2.55
(n = 24)		n = 0
Table 2. The influences of altitude, latitude and sex on age across populations in the Asian common toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus).
Table 2. The influences of altitude, latitude and sex on age across populations in the Asian common toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus).
SourceRandom Fixed
VARSDEffect SizeEstimateSEdftp
Age
Population0.4920.702
Residual1.3611.167
Altitude −0.050<0.001<0.0012.275−0.2080.853
Sex −0.170−0.2180.30693.799−0.7120.478
Age
Population0.2940.542
Residual1.3591.166
Latitude −0.250−0.2190.1633.601−1.3480.256
Sex −0.140−0.1780.312122.224−0.570 0.570
Table 3. The influences of altitude, latitude and sex on body size across populations in the Asian common toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus) after controlling age effect.
Table 3. The influences of altitude, latitude and sex on body size across populations in the Asian common toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus) after controlling age effect.
SourceRandom Fixed
VARSDEffect SizeEstimateSEdftp
SVL
Population<0.0010.021
Residual0.0010.030
Altitude 0.520<0.001<0.0012.7443.9100.035
Sex 0.1500.0110.008120.6001.3560.178
Age 0.8000.0450.002147.90021.551<0.001
Body mass
Population0.0020.045
Residual0.0110.106
Altitude 0.580<0.001<0.0011.6155.9250.044
Sex 0.1900.0420.02748.8801.5530.127
Age 0.7100.1240.007146.60016.754<0.001
SVL
Population0.001 0.037
Residual0.001 0.030
Latitude −0.350−0.0170.0103.078−1.7600.174
Sex 0.2000.0140.008147.6391.7380.084
Age 0.8000.0450.002145.85521.230<0.001
Body mass
Population0.0110.104
Residual0.0110.106
Latitude −0.430−0.0660.0283.131−2.3830.094
Sex 0.3200.0720.029147.9832.4480.016
Age 0.7000.1210.007146.33116.124<0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, K.; Qiu, D.; Zhao, L.; Yan, C.; Jin, L.; Liao, W. Geographical Variation in Body Size in the Asian Common Toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus). Life 2023, 13, 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112219

AMA Style

Zhang K, Qiu D, Zhao L, Yan C, Jin L, Liao W. Geographical Variation in Body Size in the Asian Common Toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus). Life. 2023; 13(11):2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Kunhao, Duojing Qiu, Li Zhao, Chengzhi Yan, Long Jin, and Wenbo Liao. 2023. "Geographical Variation in Body Size in the Asian Common Toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus)" Life 13, no. 11: 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop