Next Article in Journal
Planning for Urban Sustainability through Residents’ Wellbeing: The Effects of Nature Interactions, Social Capital, and Socio-Demographic Factors
Next Article in Special Issue
Green Bonds Drive Environmental Performance: Evidences from China
Previous Article in Journal
A Human–Machine Interaction Mechanism: Additive Manufacturing for Industry 5.0—Design and Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Inclusion: Green Finance and the SDGs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrating Climate Change Risks and Sustainability Goals into Saudi Arabia’s Financial Regulation: Pathways to Green Finance

by
Mohammad Omar Alhejaili
Law School, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia
Sustainability 2024, 16(10), 4159; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104159
Submission received: 13 April 2024 / Revised: 12 May 2024 / Accepted: 15 May 2024 / Published: 16 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Finance, Economics and SDGs)

Abstract

:
This study examines the integration of climate change risks and sustainability goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework to enhance green finance initiatives aligned with Vision 2030. A qualitative research design synthesises insights from a comprehensive literature review, semi-structured interviews with domain experts, and a detailed analysis of critical Saudi green finance frameworks and legislation. This research identifies mechanisms for embedding sustainability in the financial sector and addresses the challenges, opportunities, and strategic directions essential for Saudi Arabia within the global context of sustainable finance. The findings reveal a robust foundation laid by Vision 2030 initiatives yet underscore the need for enhanced regulatory frameworks, increased market readiness, and greater societal engagement. This study highlights a significant literature gap in understanding Saudi Arabia’s unique approach to green finance amid its economic diversification and sustainability goals. Contributing to original insights, this research underscores the critical role of Saudi Arabia in the global energy market and its substantial economic and environmental transformations. It offers detailed analyses and recommendations that enrich the discourse on sustainable finance, impacting policymakers, financial practitioners, and scholars.

1. Introduction

This investigation rigorously explores the integration of climate change risks and sustainability objectives within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory frameworks, with a particular emphasis on green finance under the ambit of Vision 2030. This study is structured around a central research question: How can incorporating green finance principles within Saudi Arabian financial regulations enhance the realisation of Vision 2030 and contribute to broader global sustainability efforts? This question is of paramount importance, as it not only addresses Saudi Arabia’s current needs but also has implications for global sustainability.
The objectives of this research are manifold. Firstly, it aims to conduct a detailed examination of the evolution of green finance globally, focusing on Saudi Arabia, considering the region’s unique socio-economic and environmental dynamics. Secondly, it seeks to analyse the existing policy and regulatory frameworks that underpin green finance in Saudi Arabia, assessing their coherence with international standards and their efficacy in promoting sustainable economic practices. Thirdly, this research evaluates the operational challenges and opportunities that characterise Saudi Arabia’s trajectory towards sustainable finance, intending to identify and propose solutions to overcome these hurdles.
This study identifies a significant gap in the existing research. At the same time, there is a rich body of global literature on sustainable finance. However, there needs to be more focused academic explorations into the specific modalities through which Saudi Arabia aligns with green finance principles. This research endeavour is designed to bridge this gap by providing a nuanced analysis that enhances the academic discourse on sustainable finance. It offers a granular look at the impediments and advancements within Saudi Arabia’s green finance sector. It provides actionable insights that could guide policy formulation and financial practices within the Saudi and similar economies. This unique contribution fills a crucial void in the academic understanding of sustainable finance in Saudi Arabia.
Adopting a qualitative research methodology, this study engages in an exhaustive literature review to encapsulate the current understanding and debates within the field of green finance. It is supplemented by semi-structured interviews with key experts across relevant sectors—including financial regulation, sustainable development, and environmental policy—to garner diverse perspectives on integrating sustainability goals into financial practices. A meticulous examination of Saudi Arabia’s green finance frameworks and legislation further underpins this research, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the operational realities and strategic directions in Saudi Arabian green finance.
This study enriches the discourse on sustainable finance through a detailed and critical examination. It sheds light on the intricacies of embedding sustainability and climate change mitigation strategies within the financial sector. The research informs future policy and financial practices by delving deep into Saudi Arabia’s strategic endeavours in green finance. It acts as a catalyst for further scholarly investigation in the expansive field of sustainable finance. This contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how financial systems can be leveraged to achieve sustainability goals, serving as a blueprint for similar initiatives globally.

2. Literature Review

The imperative for integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into financial systems is gaining traction, underscored by the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These goals advocate for a holistic approach to sustainable development that harmonises economic growth with environmental preservation and social equity [1]. Central to this integration is green finance, which channels financial instruments, policies, and markets toward environmental sustainability and inclusive economic growth [2]. The ‘PIF Green Finance Framework’ exemplifies Saudi Arabia’s commitment to these principles by outlining specific financial instruments and policies to promote environmental sustainability. This framework aligns Saudi’s economic strategies with global sustainability targets, contributing to a broader international effort to mitigate climate change and promote social equity [3].
Tracing the origins of green finance reveals its roots in the ‘Blueprint for a Green Economy’, initiated by the UK Government in 1989. This pivotal document marked a significant step toward embedding environmental considerations within economic and financial planning [4]. The evolution continued with the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Green Economy Initiative in 2008, highlighting the importance of green sector investments as a foundation for sustainable development. The global commitment was further solidified at the Rio+20 Conference in 2012, which recognised green finance as a strategic tool for sustainable development [5]. These milestones underscore the progressive integration of environmental goals into financial systems, setting a precedent that has influenced numerous national policies, including those of Saudi Arabia. As detailed in the ‘Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Green Financing Framework’, Saudi Arabia’s strategies reflect a local adaptation of these global initiatives, implementing them within its unique economic and environmental context [6].
The academic exploration of green finance, predominantly qualitative, has focused on developing frameworks, tools, and approaches to embed sustainability within the financial sector [7,8,9,10]. This exploration is crucial for fostering green technologies and skills, recognised as key enablers in transitioning to a green economy [11]. Studies emphasise the necessity of integrating these technologies across production and consumption processes to enhance sustainable economic growth [12]. For instance, the ‘DNV Second Party Opinion’ evaluates Saudi Arabia’s application of green finance principles, noting both advances and areas for improvement [13]. This document illustrates how Saudi Arabia is implementing frameworks that align with global standards and contribute to the advancement of green finance, reflecting a practical application of academic insights within a specific national context.
The linkage between green finance, the circular economy, and bioeconomy models is critical for addressing sustainability challenges, particularly in recovery and resilience-building post-COVID-19. This underscores the need for an integrated research and policymaking approach that promotes sustainability across all financial sectors [14]. The ‘Second Party Opinion Government of Saudi Arabia—March 2024’ offers insights into specific challenges and strategies Saudi Arabia employs in its economic strategy post-COVID-19 [15]. This document reveals efforts to integrate sustainable practices into the core of financial policies, aiming to foster resilience and sustainable development within the financial sector [16].
Realising green finance within existing economic structures presents numerous challenges, including the need for long-term policies, funding gaps for innovation, and institutional weaknesses, as identified through SWOT analysis by various scholars [17]. These challenges highlight the nuanced difficulties in advancing green finance and the critical role of strategic financial regulation. The ‘PIF Green Finance Framework’ outlines how Saudi Arabia addresses these gaps through comprehensive policies that promote sustainable financial practices. By enhancing institutional frameworks and increasing funding for green projects, Saudi Arabia aims to mitigate these barriers and strengthen the foundation of its financial sector for sustainable growth [3].
Building on the foundational understanding of green finance within the context of financial regulation and sustainability goals, this section delves into quantitative assessments of countries’ performances in transitioning towards a green economy and achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Various indices and frameworks provide critical insights into the complex interplay between financial systems, environmental sustainability, and economic development strategies. The SDG indicators, launched in 2015, serve as a pivotal tool for evaluating countries’ progress toward these goals. The Sustainable Development Report 2022 [18] highlights a notable decline in the average SDG indicators, primarily due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the urgent need for countries to align their economic recovery efforts with sustainable development practices [19].
In regions like Latin America, integrating the QHIM with 20 indicators related to the SDGs has underscored the importance of systemic harmony to support effective decision-making processes [20]. Conversely, the European green economy’s positive impact on sustainable development hosted to energy efficiency, resource productivity, and social inclusion has led to a slowdown in greening processes [21]. This contrast in Union, while confirmed, highlights the reality of challenges and approaches across different regions, underlining the necessity of tailored strategies to address specific environmental, economic, and social dynamics.
Shifting the focus to the Middle East, particularly Saudi Arabia, provides a critical regional perspective on integrating green finance and sustainable development. Utilising the EEPSE Green Economy Index, which incorporates educational, economic, political, societal, and environmental indicators in line with the Quintuple Helix Innovation Model, a recent study highlights significant strides and challenges in Saudi Arabia’s green economy from 2015 to 2020 [22]. This analysis underscores the impacts of global challenges like the COVID-19 crisis on Saudi’s sustainability efforts and highlights the importance of resilient and adaptive frameworks.
Further analysis from the region, including studies by AlArjani et al. (2021) and Alwakid et al. (2020) [23,24], indicates that only 57% of the examined sustainability goals have been achieved, pointing to significant opportunities for improvement. These findings underscore the need for a multidimensional approach that integrates economic activities with environmental sustainability and social equity, particularly focusing on enhancing efforts in renewable energy sources and green entrepreneurial activities.
A critical gap emerges from the synthesis of empirical findings and theoretical discussions throughout this review: the need for concentrated research on the interactions between green finance, sustainable development, and the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) within the unique socio-economic and environmental frameworks of Saudi Arabia. Developing a new evaluative framework that thoroughly considers the interplay among the social, economic, and ecological dimensions of sustainable development is essential. This framework should primarily focus on advancing the green economy and broadening sustainable development practices within the region [25,26].
This comprehensive review of the global shift towards green growth and the in-depth analysis of the efforts and specific challenges of regulations prepare the groundwork for an innovative evaluation to determine the sustainability of development and the scope of green initiatives in Saudi Arabia. By critically assessing these strategies and identifying research voids, this review sets the stage for future scholarly and policymaking endeavours to integrate green finance effectively into financial regulatory frameworks, thus forging pathways to achieve sustainability goals and mitigate climate change impacts.

3. Methodology

This study employs a comprehensive qualitative research design, leveraging a triangulation method to deeply examine the integration of climate change risks and sustainability goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory frameworks, explicitly focusing on Vision 2030 initiatives. Integrating an extensive literature review, semi-structured expert interviews, and a detailed analysis of crucial Saudi green finance frameworks and legislation enhances the reliability and depth of the findings through diverse data sources [27].
The methodology is grounded in a systematic and exhaustive literature review that traces green finance’s historical evolution and current trajectory globally and within the Saudi context. This literature review critically assesses the role of green finance in promoting sustainable economic growth. It is contextualised against the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), underscoring the global relevance and impact of this study. It explores the significant theoretical frameworks and empirical research highlighting the necessity of embedding sustainable practices and climate mitigation efforts within financial systems. This comprehensive examination frames this study within the current academic discourse and identifies gaps and potential areas for policy intervention in Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation strategies [4].
Building on this foundation, this literature review methodically synthesises empirical studies and theoretical insights to establish a conceptual framework for the research hypotheses. This framework assesses the efficacy of integrating green finance principles into Saudi financial regulations and the potential impacts on sustainable development [28].
The research methodology includes conducting semi-structured interviews with a purposively selected group of 15 experts, chosen for their extensive experience and pivotal roles across various sectors pertinent to green finance. These interviews are not just theoretical discussions but are designed to gather in-depth insights into the practical integration of sustainability within the Saudi green finance sector, thereby demonstrating the real-world application and value of the research.
Additionally, this study involves a thorough analysis of Saudi Arabia’s green finance frameworks and related legislative measures. This analysis critically examines how these frameworks align with international sustainability standards and evaluates their potential to foster effective green finance practices within the Saudi financial sector.
Together, these methodological components—rooted in a solid literature review, enriched by expert opinions, and supported by legislative analysis—offer a holistic and systematic exploration of the challenges and opportunities associated with integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework. This integrated approach contributes significantly to the academic domain of green finance and provides actionable insights for policymakers, financial practitioners, and stakeholders both within the kingdom and globally.

3.1. Expert Interviews

Conducting semi-structured interviews was a critical component of the research methodology, aiming to gather comprehensive insights into the integration of sustainability in Saudi Arabia’s green finance sector. This study engaged 15 experts selected for their extensive experience and pivotal roles across financial regulation, sustainable development, environmental policy, and green technology [29].
Experts were chosen through purposive sampling, based on criteria that included a minimum of ten years of experience and significant contributions to sustainability initiatives within Saudi Arabia [30]. This method ensured a broad representation of views from various sectors essential to green finance, facilitating a deep dive into expert knowledge and practices.
Interviews were conducted face-to-face and virtually, depending on the participants’ availability, with each session lasting approximately 60 min. This format allowed for a thorough exploration of the experts’ views, ensuring the comprehensiveness of our research. The semi-structured nature of the interviews allowed for probing into specific areas of interest while allowing the conversation to evolve organically based on expert responses.
The interview guide included vital questions crucial to uncovering insights into the current landscape and future directions of green finance in Saudi Arabia. These questions focused on describing the current regulatory framework, identifying primary challenges in aligning Saudi’s financial practices with global sustainability objectives, and exploring anticipated developments in green finance under Vision 2030, ensuring the relevance and significance of our research.

3.2. Analysis of Saudi Green Finance Frameworks and Laws

A critical examination of Saudi Arabia’s green finance frameworks and related legislative measures constitutes a fundamental component of this methodology. This detailed analysis assesses how these frameworks align with international sustainability standards and evaluates their potential to foster effective green finance practices within the Saudi financial sector. Documents such as the Public Investment Fund’s (PIF) Green Finance Framework are scrutinised to assess their comprehensiveness, efficacy, and improvement areas, offering a critical lens on the regulatory landscape [31].

3.3. Data Analysis

The qualitative data gathered from the literature review, expert interviews, and legislative document analysis are processed through thematic analysis. This method is selected for its effectiveness in extracting and interpreting patterns within qualitative data. It facilitates a nuanced exploration of the interrelations between regulatory frameworks, market practices, and societal trends influencing green finance [32]. The analytical process is iterative, involving meticulous coding, initial theme generation, and subsequent refinement to ensure an accurate and faithful representation of the underlying data.
By employing this rigorous and comprehensive methodological framework, this study aims to provide a holistic and systematic exploration of the challenges and opportunities associated with integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework. Integrating insights from scholarly literature, expert perspectives, and legislative analysis contributes significantly to the academic domain of green finance. It provides actionable recommendations for policymakers, financial practitioners, and stakeholders both within the kingdom and globally.

4. Results

Given the complexity and nuance of integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation, this qualitative study has provided significant insights through thematic analysis. This section presents the emergent themes from the interviews and document analysis, delineating the current landscape, challenges, strategies for integration, and future directions of green finance in Saudi Arabia. Each theme is explored in detail, referencing existing literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the field and to suggest avenues for future research and policy formulation.

4.1. Emergent Themes

4.1.1. Current Landscape of Green Finance in Saudi Arabia

Within the evolving landscape of green finance in Saudi Arabia, a critical examination reveals a dynamic interplay between ambitious national strategies and the practical realities of their implementation and integration. This contrast is vividly illustrated by the reflections of a key informant who notes, “Saudi Arabia is ardently pursuing green finance as part of its Vision 2030, aiming to cement sustainability into the fabric of its financial sector” (expert). This statement highlights the country’s commitment and acknowledges the nascent stage of this integration within the broader financial landscape, prompting a deeper inquiry into how these ambitions translate into actionable frameworks and measurable outcomes [33].
The juxtaposition of Saudi Arabia’s strategic intentions against global best practices necessitates a thorough examination. The literature underscores the importance of establishing clear visions and implementing concrete policies that operationalise sustainability goals within financial regulations [34,35]. Reflecting on the expert’s observations, it becomes essential to analyse how Saudi Arabia’s regulatory environment, investment practices, and financial products align with these global standards, identifying potential gaps and areas for enhancement.
Moreover, the expert’s mention of Saudi Arabia’s “ardent pursuit” triggers a discussion on the effectiveness of current green finance initiatives and the mechanisms of policy translation. Research indicates that transitioning to sustainable finance requires top-down policy directives and a bottom-up cultural shift within financial institutions towards sustainability [36,37]. This insight raises critical questions about the internalisation of green finance principles among Saudi financial entities and their reflection in operational and investment decisions.
Additionally, the expert’s insights underline the significant role of green finance in supporting Saudi Arabia’s broader economic diversification efforts as outlined in Vision 2030. This strategic alignment between financial sustainability and economic diversification is a recurring theme in sustainable finance literature, which advocates for integrating environmental and social governance (ESG) criteria to achieve long-term economic resilience and growth [38]. Therefore, this discussion is a foundation for examining the interdependencies between green finance and economic diversification strategies in Saudi Arabia.
By integrating insights from experts with existing academic literature, this analysis elucidates the complex and ambitious terrain of green finance within Saudi Arabia. Through a critical lens, the dialogue initiated by experts helps to uncover the multifaceted hurdles that challenge the integration of sustainability within the financial sector. These challenges span from aligning regulatory frameworks and effecting cultural transformations to the practical implementation of strategic national objectives. Such an in-depth exploration, recognising the progress made to date, underscores the ongoing need for both scholarly inquiry and pragmatic action aimed at enhancing and actualising green finance initiatives tailored to the unique socio-economic and environmental context of Saudi Arabia.

4.1.2. Challenges in Integrating Sustainability into Financial Regulation

The challenges of embedding sustainability within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework are profoundly nuanced and multifaceted. As highlighted by an expert, “One of the main challenges is the lack of standardised metrics and frameworks for evaluating the environmental impact of investments” (expert). This observation underscores a significant barrier that impedes the operationalisation of green finance initiatives and mirrors a widespread challenge within the global sustainability domain. The absence of uniform metrics and frameworks complicates the assessment and comparison of the sustainability impacts of financial activities, reflecting concerns about the need for harmonised global standards in green finance as discussed in the literature [39].
Further complicating the landscape, another expert points out the difficulty in “navigating the complex regulatory landscape, which involves multiple stakeholders with varying priorities and degrees of commitment to sustainability goals” (expert). This comment encapsulates the intricate dynamics within regulatory environments, where diverging stakeholder interests can lead to fragmented approaches to sustainability. This fragmentation is recognised in scholarly work as a significant obstacle to the cohesive integration of sustainability goals into financial regulations, underscoring the urgent need for a unified regulatory vision that aligns with global sustainability benchmarks [40,41].
Additionally, the challenge of “aligning short-term financial objectives with long-term sustainability outcomes” is another tension identified by an expert. This dichotomy between immediate profitability and enduring environmental stewardship is a well-documented theme in financial discourse, sparking debates over perceived trade-offs and advocating for a paradigm shift that recognises the long-term value creation of sustainable finance practices [42,43,44].
These expert insights prompt a deeper reflection on the necessary structural, cultural, and policy-related shifts to cultivate a supportive environment for green finance in Saudi Arabia. Developing standardised metrics, establishing cohesive regulatory frameworks, and transforming the sector’s valuation systems prioritise sustainability as a core component of financial decision-making [45,46]. These shifts are essential for operationalising the sustainability objectives of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 within its financial sector, indicating a complex interplay between regulatory adaptation, stakeholder engagement, and cultural evolution toward sustainability.
Through expert insights and academic analysis, this exploration of sustainability integration into financial regulations reveals Saudi Arabia’s specific hurdles in aligning its financial sector with broader sustainable development objectives. Positioned within the larger global context of transitioning towards sustainable finance, this analysis underscores the critical need for continuous academic research and dialogue. Such scholarly engagement is vital to effectively navigate the complexities of harmonising financial practices with sustainability goals, highlighting the dynamic interplay between practical challenges and theoretical considerations in advancing sustainable finance. This ongoing inquiry not only deepens the understanding of these issues but also contributes to developing actionable strategies that can drive the effective integration of sustainability into the financial regulatory frameworks.

4.1.3. Strategies for Integration

In the intricate realm of Saudi Arabia’s green finance, the strategic integration of sustainability and climate change considerations into financial regulations emerges as a pivotal area of concentration. An expert’s observation illuminates a crucial direction for advancement: “By formulating precise, standardised metrics and providing incentives for sustainable investments, we can expedite the adoption of green finance practices” (expert). This viewpoint underscores the significance of establishing measurable and universally recognised metrics to evaluate the sustainability impacts of financial activities, echoing the academic consensus on the indispensability of such measures [11,39,47].
The suggestion of “offering incentives for sustainable investments” highlights the potential for policy mechanisms to influence market behaviours positively. Scholarly discussions support this strategy, advocating using regulatory incentives, such as tax benefits, subsidies, or differentiated capital requirements, to direct capital towards environmentally sustainable projects [41,48]. The analysis delves into the effectiveness of such incentives within the Saudi context, exploring how well they balance incentivisation with the genuine motivation of financial institutions toward sustainability.
Furthermore, the expert articulates a significant challenge in “bridging the gap between environmental advocacy and financial industry practices” (expert), encapsulating a wide-ranging systemic issue. This assertion resonates with the academic discourse advocating for an integrative approach encompassing financial and regulatory changes and cultural and educational shifts within the industry towards sustainability [49,50]. It beckons a critical examination of the current collaborations and partnerships between NGOs, government bodies, and financial institutions, evaluating their effectiveness in fostering a collective commitment to green finance.
This discussion on integration strategies necessitates the consideration of how policy frameworks, incentive structures, and collaborative efforts can be optimised. The analysis further explores the interdependencies between regulatory clarity, market readiness, and stakeholder engagement in advancing the green finance agenda within Saudi Arabia.
The discourse reveals the complex dynamics in operationalising sustainability within financial regulations by juxtaposing expert perspectives with academic insights. It highlights the necessity for a comprehensive strategy that connects policy, practice, and cultural shifts. Through this analytical lens, the expert’s comments provide a foundation for deeper investigations into the approach that can catalyse the transition towards a sustainable financial ecosystem in Saudi Arabia. This ongoing dialogue aligns with global discussions on sustainable finance and emphasises the need for innovative and adaptive solutions to embed sustainability deeply within the financial sector’s framework.

4.1.4. Future Directions and Vision 2030

The intersection of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 with the domain of green finance encapsulates a forward-looking ambition deeply rooted in sustainability and economic diversification. This ambitious alignment is articulated by an expert who notes, “As more people seek to align their investments with their values, we anticipate a significant shift towards sustainability in the financial sector” (expert). This statement underscores the growing societal demand for ethical investment options and highlights the transformative potential of green finance as a vehicle for realising Vision 2030’s sustainability objectives [33].
The anticipated “significant shift” reflects a broader, globally observed trend where personal values increasingly influence investment strategies, heralding a new era of finance that prioritises Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria. This observation aligns with scholarly discussions emphasising the role of consumer and investor preferences in steering the financial sector towards sustainability [50]. The analysis delves into how Saudi Arabia’s financial regulations and market practices are evolving to accommodate and catalyse this transition, juxtaposing the current state with the projected trajectory under Vision 2030.
Additionally, the expert highlights the critical role of technological innovations and fintech in bridging the gap between sustainability aspirations and investment realities. “Innovations in fintech and blockchain offer new ways to track and verify the environmental impact of investments, making it easier for investors to make informed decisions”, says the expert. This insight aligns with academic discourse that positions technological advancements as crucial in enhancing the transparency, accessibility, and efficiency of green finance [51]. It also prompts a critical examination of the readiness of Saudi Arabia’s financial infrastructure to integrate and leverage such disruptive technologies, considering the regulatory, technical, and cultural challenges involved.
As framed by Vision 2030 and reflected in the expert’s insights, the discussion about the future of green finance in Saudi Arabia involves the dynamic interplay between societal values, technological innovation, and regulatory frameworks. This discourse invites a deeper inquiry into how the sustainability goals of Vision 2030 are operationalised within the financial sector, examining the mechanisms through which green finance is being mainstreamed into investment practices and the broader economic landscape.
Integrating expert prognostications with in-depth scholarly research, this analysis unveils a complex spectrum of challenges and opportunities inherent in advancing green finance within Saudi Arabia. It contributes to academic discourse and practical applications concerning implementing sustainability principles in financial infrastructures. This discussion underscores the need for supportive and adaptive policy frameworks, market preparedness to embrace sustainable practices, and active societal involvement in creating an environment conducive to green finance.
By delving into these aspects through expert insights, this research positions Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 as a pivotal element in the global dialogue on sustainable finance. This strategic vision highlights Saudi Arabia’s potential to catalyse transformative shifts within the financial domain and emphasises its alignment with evolving global narratives on sustainability. This nuanced exploration delineates Saudi Arabia’s strategic pathways towards embedding green finance at the core of its financial system, showcasing its alignment with and contributions to emerging global sustainability paradigms.

5. Discussion

This research meticulously combines findings from a literature review, expert interviews, and an examination of Saudi Arabia’s green finance laws and initiatives. This comprehensive synthesis aligns with and enhances the academic discourse on sustainable finance, offering a detailed understanding of Saudi Arabia’s distinctive context. By incorporating expert insights and a thorough analysis of Saudi laws and initiatives, this study illuminates potential strategies for integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi’s financial regulation, thereby enriching the global body of knowledge on green finance.

5.1. Integration of Climate Change Risks and Sustainability Goals

Integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework is critical to the nation’s Vision 2030. This strategic integration leverages comprehensive green finance frameworks and initiatives, reflecting a commitment to align with global sustainability trends while addressing unique national development challenges.
Bridging Global Standards and Local Implementation: Saudi Arabia’s concerted efforts to align its green finance frameworks with international standards, such as those stipulated by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) and the Loan Market Association (LMA), reflect a deep commitment to global best practices in sustainable finance. The alignment with these standards is not merely a procedural adherence but a strategic engagement to enhance transparency, comparability, and confidence among international investors and stakeholders. As pointed out in the literature, this strategic alignment is critical for building a robust framework that supports transparency and investor confidence, essential elements for attracting global investments [50]. The Public Investment Fund’s (PIF) Green Finance Framework illustrates Saudi Arabia’s endeavours to integrate into the global green finance landscape and tailor these practices to meet its unique environmental and economic needs. An expert’s observation underscores this strategy: “Aligning with global standards is not just about attracting investments; it is about fostering a sustainable economic future”, highlighting the strategic importance of such standardisation for broader sustainability goals.
Addressing the Circular Carbon Economy Model: Adopting the Circular Carbon Economy (CCE) model, endorsed by the G20, is particularly noteworthy. This model promotes a holistic approach to climate change mitigation, incorporating reduction, reuse, recycling, and carbon removal principles. This approach aligns with the emerging academic discourse that advocates for adaptable and holistic frameworks in addressing climate change challenges [52]. By integrating the CCE model within its green finance frameworks, Saudi Arabia adheres to innovative global sustainability paradigms and paves new pathways for sustainable growth. This approach reflects a pioneering strategy in transitioning towards a green economy, situating the kingdom at the forefront of ecological innovation.
Transparency, Reporting, and Market Development: The emphasis on transparency and market development through stringent project evaluation, selection, and reporting mechanisms is another cornerstone of Saudi Arabia’s strategy to mature its green finance market. These mechanisms are vital for mitigating risks associated with climate change and sustainability investments, as transparency plays a pivotal role in risk management strategies in financial markets [41]. Saudi initiatives, such as the detailed evaluations in the ‘DNV Second Party Opinion’ and the frameworks outlined in the ‘PIF Green Finance Framework’, serve as benchmarks and templates that other nations could emulate as they embark on similar sustainability journeys [8].
Collaborative Efforts and ESG Integration: Saudi Arabia’s engagement in international sustainability efforts, like the One Planet Sovereign Wealth Funds initiative, highlights its commitment to global collaboration in green finance. This international collaboration is crucial for advancing collective global sustainability goals, a sentiment echoed across academic discussions [51]. Additionally, Saudi Arabia’s comprehensive strategy towards Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria integration exemplifies a proactive approach to embedding sustainability deeply within economic diversification and financial practices. This integration indicates a broader, more inclusive understanding of sustainability that transcends environmental considerations to include significant social and governance dimensions [53].
In integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into its financial regulatory framework, Saudi Arabia is crafting a detailed, ambitious strategy that aligns with international standards and innovatively addresses unique national challenges. This strategic orientation continuously shapes the financial sector’s trajectory towards sustainable growth, adhering to a nuanced, multifaceted approach incorporating cutting-edge technological advancements, robust policy frameworks, and active global collaboration.

5.2. Addressing Standardisation and Regulatory Harmonisation

The endeavour to standardise metrics and frameworks for green finance is critical for accurately assessing the environmental impacts of investments. It marks a foundational challenge in integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework. What sets Saudi Arabia apart is its unique approach to this push towards standardisation, clearly outlined in its green finance frameworks and consistently echoed by industry experts. This distinct approach aligns with broader scholarly discussions in sustainable finance, emphasising its pivotal role in global finance.
Standardisation and Regulatory Harmonisation: Saudi Arabia’s commitment to aligning with international standards, such as those established by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) and the Loan Market Association (LMA), underscores a strategic commitment to standardisation. This commitment transcends mere regulatory compliance, which is critical to fostering a transparent, credible, and efficient green finance market. Scholars like Scholtens (2017) [41] stress the importance of standard metrics for environmental impact assessments within green finance, essential for ensuring comparability and reliability across international borders. An expert elaborates on this alignment: “The adoption of international green bond principles by Saudi financial institutions marks a significant milestone in marrying global standards with local practices, thereby enhancing Saudi’s credibility in green finance”. This alignment facilitates Saudi Arabia’s integration into the global green finance ecosystem and replicates the model for other nations undergoing similar transitions.
The Circular Carbon Economy (CCE) Model: Saudi Arabia’s innovative adoption of the CCE model, endorsed by the G20, is a testament to its forward-thinking approach to standardisation and sustainability. This model’s focus on reducing, reusing, recycling, and removing carbon offers a comprehensive strategy for climate change mitigation. Integrating the CCE model into Saudi’s financial strategies enhances the kingdom’s contributions to sustainable finance discourse and positions it as a pioneer in conceptualising and operationalising green finance through a focused, carbon-centric lens.
Transparency and Market Development: The emphasis on transparency through rigorous project evaluation and reporting mechanisms addresses significant concerns highlighted in sustainable finance literature. Transparency is crucial for risk mitigation and is fundamental in building investor confidence in green finance [39]. Saudi Arabia’s structured approach to enhancing transparency, primarily through initiatives like the Public Investment Fund’s Green Finance Framework, underscores a commitment to developing a robust green finance market grounded in clear, transparent, and standardised practices.
Collaborative Efforts and ESG Integration: Saudi Arabia’s active participation in international sustainability efforts, like the One Planet Sovereign Wealth Funds initiative, and its comprehensive Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategy highlights its dedication to global sustainability. This strategic integration of ESG criteria aligns with expert opinions and scholarly literature advocating for incorporating these criteria as fundamental to sustainable economic growth and investment strategies [53]. Saudi Arabia’s focus on ESG criteria enhances its sustainability profile and significantly contributes to the global dialogue on best practices in green finance.
Integrating standardisation, innovative sustainability models, enhanced transparency, and active global collaboration into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework illustrates a comprehensive and strategic approach to embedding green finance. This strategy adheres to global sustainability norms and actively shapes them, offering valuable insights into operationalising sustainable practices within national and international financial systems. This ongoing dialogue enriches scholarly inquiry and practical applications, deepening sustainable development and finance discourse. It invites further exploration into how these integrated strategies can be optimised and adapted to meet emerging challenges and opportunities in the dynamic landscape of global green finance.

5.3. Leveraging Societal Shifts and Technological Innovations

The anticipated societal shift towards sustainable investments within Saudi Arabia, underscored by Vision 2030 and its associated green finance frameworks, signifies a broader, transformative trend that intricately connects societal values with financial practices. This transition is not occurring in isolation but reflects a global movement towards sustainability, as highlighted by experts and reinforced by scholarly discourse. Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria into investment decisions, powered by technological advancements, is emerging as a vital pathway for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
A growing shift in consumer and investor behaviour towards sustainable investments, as observed in the literature and by industry experts, is driven by a marked preference for aligning personal values with investment choices. This trend, increasingly visible in the financial sector, results from the broader recognition of the role of sustainable investments in promoting long-term economic stability and growth. Ref. [50] highlights this dynamic, noting how consumer preferences are becoming central to the evolution of financial markets towards sustainability. Saudi Arabia’s initiatives to promote green finance intensely demonstrate this societal push towards ethical investment options, which not only respond to but also stimulate this shift, thereby catalysing the integration of individual values into macro-economic strategies.
Technological innovations, especially in fintech and blockchain, are increasingly pivotal in enhancing the transparency and efficiency of green finance. These technologies offer novel methods for tracking and verifying the environmental impact of investments, thereby facilitating more informed decision-making among investors. “Innovations in fintech and blockchain provide new avenues to ensure that investment impacts are clear and visible, enhancing investor confidence and driving further interest in sustainable finance options”, an expert noted. This perspective aligns with the academic discourse, such as that presented by Zadek and Flynn (2013) [51], who argue that technological advancements are crucial in revolutionising green finance by improving accessibility and efficiency. Such innovations support the operational aspects of sustainable investing and enhance governance by ensuring compliance with environmental standards and facilitating real-time monitoring and reporting.
The synthesis of societal shifts towards sustainable investments and the integration of technological innovations in Saudi Arabia’s financial sector underscore the necessity for robust policy and regulatory frameworks. These frameworks are supportive and actively promote the adoption of ESG criteria and the utilisation of technological advancements. As Saudi Arabia continues to implement its Vision 2030 and green finance frameworks, the literature and expert insights highlight the critical importance of policies that foster an enabling environment for sustainable finance. Regulatory frameworks are pivotal in this context, providing the necessary structure and oversight to ensure that financial markets effectively contribute to sustainability goals. Scholtens (2017) [41] particularly notes the instrumental role of regulatory bodies in guiding financial markets towards sustainable practices, suggesting that policy interventions are crucial to steering the financial sector in alignment with broader environmental and social objectives.
This ongoing analysis of the integration of green finance in Saudi Arabia, enriched by expert insights and a rigorous review of the scholarly literature, reveals the complex interplay between evolving societal expectations, rapid technological advancements, and strategic policy developments. By examining these factors in detail, the discussion illuminates the multifaceted strategies Saudi Arabia employs to embed climate change considerations and sustainability objectives deeply within its financial regulatory framework. This detailed exploration highlights how societal trends, technological innovation, and regulatory frameworks interact, emphasising that a comprehensive approach is required to successfully integrate sustainability into financial regulations. This approach not only adapts to current demands but also anticipates future challenges and opportunities in the dynamic landscape of global green finance, driving forward the discourse on sustainable development without concluding the exploration of these themes.

5.4. Strategic Policy Implications and Future Directions

The strategic policy implications and future directions for integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation reveal the need for a holistic approach. This approach requires regulatory adaptations, technological innovations, and a profound societal shift towards sustainability. These dynamics involve complex interrelations among policy, technology, and societal values, as evidenced by expert insights, literature reviews, and analyses of Saudi green finance frameworks.

5.4.1. Strategic Policy Implications

Enhanced Regulatory Frameworks: Insights from experts and the literature stress the urgent need for an improved regulatory framework that aligns with global standards while reflecting the unique socio-economic context of Saudi Arabia. The Public Investment Fund’s (PIF) Green Finance Framework, which adheres to the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) Green Bond Principles, serves as a model for regulatory practices. Policymakers are encouraged to broaden this framework, ensuring that all aspects of green finance within Saudi Arabia comply with internationally recognised standards to attract global investment flows into sustainable projects. This alignment is crucial for enhancing Saudi’s credibility in the global green finance market, as a financial industry expert emphasises the importance of international compliance for bolstering Saudi’s green finance stature (expert).
Catalysing Technological Innovations: The expected societal shift towards sustainable investments, driven by innovations in fintech and blockchain, necessitates policy support to catalyse these technological advancements. Saudi’s Vision 2030, which prioritises digital transformation as a key economic pillar, should be extended to promote green finance technologies. Strategies include establishing innovation hubs, providing grants and incentives for start-ups, and creating a regulatory sandbox to test new green finance products. Such initiatives would not only accelerate the adoption of technologies that enhance the transparency, efficiency, and accessibility of green finance but also support the broader narrative of fintech’s transformative potential in sustainability, as discussed in academic circles [51].
Integrating Societal Values with Financial Practices: The increasing demand for investments that align with sustainability underscores a significant societal shift towards ethical finance. This shift necessitates policies that encourage and facilitate sustainable investment choices. Educational campaigns and financial literacy programs tailored to green finance could be pivotal in this integration. Policymakers should consider the implementation of mandatory sustainability reporting for companies, which would provide investors with essential information to make informed decisions that reflect their ethical values. This strategy resonates with scholarly discussions on the growing impact of consumer and investor preferences in directing the financial sector towards sustainability [50].
These strategic policy implications are crucial for embedding climate change risks and sustainability goals effectively within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework. By advancing these policies, Saudi Arabia can ensure that its financial systems adapt to and lead the global shift towards sustainable financial practices. This approach aligns with the kingdom’s broader economic and environmental objectives as outlined in Vision 2030, reflecting a deep commitment to sustainable development that integrates regulatory foresight, technological advancement, and societal values.

5.4.2. Future Directions

The strategic policy implications and future directions for integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulations are complex and multidimensional. These efforts require a concerted approach involving policy adjustments, technological innovations, and broad-based stakeholder engagement, ensuring that the move towards sustainable finance is holistic and comprehensive.
Broadening Stakeholder Engagement: Future policies should aim to broaden stakeholder engagement to facilitate a more inclusive transition towards sustainable finance. This includes financial institutions and investors and engaging civil society, academia, and the international community in the development and implementation of green finance strategies. Such an inclusive approach ensures that the transition addresses various needs and concerns, reflecting the diverse perspectives and expertise that can enrich policy formulation and execution. For instance, involving academia can bring research-based insights into policy deliberations, while civil society organisations can ensure that social equity considerations are robustly integrated into financial strategies.
Benchmarking and Continuous Improvement: Saudi Arabia’s green finance initiatives should be evaluated and benchmarked against international best practices to maintain and enhance its position at the forefront of sustainable finance. This iterative process identifies areas requiring enhancements and adaptations and ensures that the kingdom’s financial practices align with global expectations and standards. Implementing a regular cycle of publishing impact reports and detailed assessments of sustainability outcomes can significantly enhance transparency and build investor confidence. Such transparency is crucial for attracting international investments, maintaining public trust, and ensuring accountability in pursuing sustainability goals.
Fostering International Collaboration: Considering the global nature of sustainability challenges, Saudi Arabia should actively seek to foster international collaborations in green finance. Participation in global forums, forming partnerships with other nations, and contributing to international sustainability funds can enhance Saudi Arabia’s role in the global sustainability agenda. These efforts facilitate the exchange of knowledge, promote cooperative endeavours in addressing climate change, and help integrate Saudi Arabian financial markets into the broader global efforts towards sustainability. Such collaborations can also provide opportunities for Saudi Arabia to learn from and contribute to global best practices, ensuring the kingdom’s green finance strategies reflect local needs and global ambitions.
In discussing these strategic policy implications and future directions, integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulations demands a nuanced, multifaceted approach. This approach must align regulatory frameworks with global standards, leverage the latest technological innovations, and deeply embed societal values into financial practices. By fostering a robust engagement with a broad array of stakeholders and continually adapting to international standards and innovations, Saudi Arabia can effectively navigate its transition towards a sustainable financial ecosystem. This strategy positions the kingdom as a leader in green finance and sets a benchmark for other nations striving to reconcile economic growth with environmental stewardship and social equity. The ongoing discussion in this area suggests that while substantial progress has been made, the path forward requires sustained commitment and strategic planning, reflecting a dynamic interplay of regulatory, technological, and societal dimensions.

6. Recommendations and Future Research

Based on the comprehensive exploration of integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation, this study offers strategic recommendations and identifies avenues for future research. These recommendations are aimed at policymakers, financial institutions, and the broader stakeholder community within Saudi Arabia and beyond. They are designed to enhance the effectiveness of green finance initiatives, ensuring they align with global sustainability objectives and Saudi Vision 2030.

6.1. Recommendations

Strengthen Regulatory Frameworks: Develop and refine regulatory frameworks that explicitly incorporate green finance principles and are adaptable to evolving international standards. This entails establishing guidelines for green bonds, loans, and other financial instruments that fund sustainable projects.
Expand Green Finance Education and Awareness: Implement comprehensive education and awareness programs targeting the financial sector and the public to increase understanding and support for green finance. Such programs should emphasise the economic and environmental benefits of sustainable investment practices.
Foster Technological Innovation: Encourage the adoption of fintech and blockchain technologies that can enhance the transparency, efficiency, and accessibility of green finance. Support for start-ups and innovation hubs focused on sustainable finance technologies should be prioritised.
Enhance Public-Private Partnerships: Strengthen collaboration between government entities, financial institutions, and private sector stakeholders to mobilise resources for sustainable projects. These partnerships can leverage private investment to meet public sustainability goals.
Integrate ESG Criteria into Financial Decision-Making: Mandate the integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria into financial institutions’ investment and lending decisions. This can be supported by developing standardised ESG reporting and assessment frameworks.

6.2. Directions for Future Research

Impact Assessment of Green Finance Policies: Future studies should evaluate the impact of green finance policies and initiatives within Saudi Arabia on environmental sustainability and economic growth. This involves quantifying the environmental benefits of funded projects and their contribution to Saudi’s GDP.
Comparative Analysis with Global Practices: Research comparing Saudi Arabia’s green finance frameworks with those of other countries can provide insights into best practices and areas for improvement. Such studies could focus on the effectiveness of policy incentives, regulatory approaches, and market mechanisms in fostering sustainable finance.
Technological Innovations in Green Finance: Investigate the potential of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain, in advancing green finance. Research could explore how these technologies can improve project monitoring, risk assessment, and investor engagement in sustainable projects.
Societal Perceptions and Engagement: Examine the attitudes and perceptions of investors, consumers, and the broader public towards green finance and sustainability initiatives. Understanding societal engagement with green finance can inform targeted awareness and education strategies.
Longitudinal Studies on Market Evolution: Conduct longitudinal studies to track the evolution of the green finance market in Saudi Arabia, analysing trends in green bond issuance, sustainable investment flows, and the development of green finance products over time.
By addressing these recommendations and exploring the suggested research directions, stakeholders can significantly advance the integration of sustainability into Saudi Arabia’s financial system. This concerted effort will not only contribute to Saudi’s Vision 2030 objectives but also position Saudi Arabia as a leader in sustainable finance on the global stage.

7. Limitations of the Study

This research offers insights into integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation framework. However, this study’s interpretive depth and applicability are constrained by several limitations, which are critical to acknowledge for a nuanced understanding of the findings:
Insufficient Focus on Fossil Fuels and Oil: The most conspicuous limitation is the marginal treatment of the fossil fuel sector—Saudi Arabia’s economic backbone. The underrepresentation of this sector in the analysis potentially leads to an incomplete understanding of the intricate interplay between established energy industries and nascent green finance initiatives. The absence of a detailed exploration into how fossil fuel reliance might conflict with or complement green finance policies limits this study’s ability to fully articulate the challenges and opportunities inherent in transitioning to sustainable financial practices. This oversight is particularly critical given the global environmental impact of fossil fuels and the geopolitical significance of oil in Saudi Arabia. Theoretical frameworks such as path dependency and institutional inertia could provide valuable lenses for future research to examine these dynamics more comprehensively.
  • General Limitations:
Expert Selection Bias: While methodologically justified, this study’s reliance on a purposive sample of experts introduces potential biases that may affect the findings. This selection bias might favour perspectives that align more closely with the prevailing governmental or financial narratives promoting green finance, thus overlooking critical or dissenting viewpoints that could offer deeper insights into the barriers to implementing sustainable financial practices. Future studies might benefit from incorporating a more heterogeneous expert pool or employing a Delphi method to achieve a balanced consensus among a broader range of stakeholders.
Generalisability of Findings: The research context—centred exclusively on Saudi Arabia—raises questions about the generalisability of the findings. Saudi Arabia’s unique economic structure, characterised by heavy state involvement and reliance on oil revenues, does not easily parallel other economies with different governance styles and economic bases. This limitation suggests that findings from this study should be applied cautiously to other contexts without substantive contextual adaptations. Comparative studies could enrich understanding by exploring how different national contexts influence the adoption and efficacy of green finance policies.
Scope of the Study: The scope limitation, focusing predominantly on regulatory aspects, neglects the broader socio-political and cultural factors that influence the implementation of green finance. For instance, public awareness of and attitudes towards sustainability, the political will to enforce regulations, and the social movements advocating for environmental accountability play crucial roles in shaping policy outcomes. Integrating theories from political ecology or environmental sociology could enhance future research, providing a more holistic view of how various forces converge to influence green finance.
In response to these limitations, further research should expand the theoretical and methodological approaches to include a broader spectrum of economic activities, incorporate diverse expert opinions, and apply a comparative lens to analyse how different countries integrate green finance into their financial systems. Such approaches would address the gaps identified in this study and contribute to a more robust and nuanced discourse on sustainable finance globally.

8. Conclusions and Policy Implications

The culmination of this research presents a comprehensive exploration into the integration of climate change risks and sustainability goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation framework, mainly through the lens of green finance. This investigation, rooted in an extensive literature review, expert interviews, and an in-depth analysis of Saudi Arabia’s green finance frameworks and laws, illuminates the multifaceted challenges and opportunities characterising Saudi’s journey towards sustainable finance.
This study aligns strategically with Vision 2030, underscoring a national ambition to foster inclusive and sustainable economic growth. Incorporating green finance principles into the financial sector is a pivotal element in this strategy, offering a pathway towards achieving broader sustainability objectives while addressing global environmental challenges. The analysis underscores the significance of regulatory frameworks, technological innovations, and societal engagement in facilitating this transition, highlighting Saudi Arabia’s efforts to harmonise with international standards and best practices.
Key findings from this research indicate that while Saudi Arabia has made commendable strides in establishing a foundational framework for green finance, there remain inherent challenges in fully operationalising these initiatives. These include the need for standardised metrics for evaluating environmental impacts, the complexity of aligning diverse stakeholder interests, and the imperative for cultural shifts within financial institutions towards sustainability. Despite these challenges, Saudi’s commitment to enhancing transparency, fostering technological innovation, and integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria into financial practices signals a promising future for green finance in Saudi Arabia.
The recommendations aim to refine and expand Saudi’s green finance initiatives, emphasising the importance of regulatory enhancement, educational programs, public–private partnerships, and the integration of ESG criteria. Additionally, identifying avenues for future research offers a roadmap for scholarly inquiry and policy analysis that can support the continued evolution of sustainable finance in Saudi Arabia and beyond.
This research significantly enriches both the academic and practical discourse surrounding sustainable finance. It offers profound insights into how integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals within financial regulations can be effectively realised. This study underscores Saudi Arabia’s critical position within the global sustainability framework, showcasing Saudi’s capacity to spearhead substantial shifts within the financial domain that resonate with the evolving worldwide sustainability paradigm. The progression of green finance initiatives in Saudi Arabia is not merely a step towards the fulfilment of Vision 2030 but also a meaningful contribution to the collective global pursuit of sustainable development and enhanced climate resilience.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author, Dr. Mohammad O. Alhejaili, upon reasonable request. Due to privacy and ethical restrictions, some qualitative interview data cannot be publicly available. However, anonymised transcripts and summarised data used in the analysis are available upon request. Additional documentation can also be provided to interested researchers, including the detailed coding framework and methodological notes.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khoshnava, S.M.; Rostami, R.; Zin, R.M.; Štreimikiene, D.; Yousefpour, A.; Mardani, A.; Alrasheedi, M. Contribution of green infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 320–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akomea-Frimpong, I.; Adeabah, D.; Ofosu, D.; Tenakwah, E.J. A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions. J. Sustain. Finance Investig. 2022, 12, 1241–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Public Investment Fund. PIF Green Finance Framework Preamble; Public Investment Fund: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2023.
  4. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  5. Horner, C.C. An assessment of the June 2012 Rio+ 20 UN conference on sustainable development. Fed. Soc. Engag. 2012, 13. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ministry of Finance. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Green Financing Framework. 2024. Available online: https://ndmc.gov.sa/investorsrelations/Documents/Green-Financing-Framework-KSA-28March2024.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2024).
  7. Capasso, M.; Hansen, T.; Heiberg, J.; Klitkou, A.; Steen, M. Green growth—A synthesis of scientific findings. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 146, 390–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Diyar, S.; Akparova, A.; Toktabayev, A.; Tyutunnikova, M. Green economy–innovation-based development of Kazakhstan. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 140, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Loiseau, E.; Saikku, L.; Antikainen, R.; Droste, N.; Hansjürgens, B.; Pitkänen, K.; Leskinen, P.; Kuikman, P.; Thomsen, M. Green economy and related concepts: An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Merino-Saum, A.; Baldi, M.G.; Gunderson, I.; Oberle, B. Articulating natural resources and sustainable development goals through green economy indicators: A systematic analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 139, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hafner, S.; Jones, A.; Anger-Kraavi, A.; Pohl, J. Closing the green finance gap—A systems perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2020, 34, 26–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Razzaq, A.; Sharif, A.; Ozturk, I.; Skare, M. Asymmetric influence of digital finance, and renewable energy technology innovation on green growth in China. Renew. Energy 2023, 202, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. DNV GL Business Assurance. Second-Party Opinion on the Green Finance Framework of the Public Investment Fund; DNV GL Business Assurance: Oslo, Norway, 2022. Available online: https://www.pif.gov.sa/en/our-financials/green-finance-framework/ (accessed on 12 April 2024).
  14. Cunha, F.A.F.D.S.; Meira, E.; Orsato, R.J. Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 3821–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Galanakis, C.M.; Brunori, G.; Chiaramonti, D.; Matthews, R.; Panoutsou, C.; Fritsche, U.R. Bioeconomy and green recovery in a post-COVID-19 era. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 152180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Public Investment Fund. Second Party Opinion Government of Saudi Arabia; Public Investment Fund: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2024.
  17. Nygaard, A. Green SWOT Analysis. In Green Marketing and Entrepreneurship; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 113–135. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sachs, J.D.; Kroll, C.; Lafortune, G.; Fuller, G.; Woelm, F. Sustainable Development Report 2022; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  19. Brzyska, J.; Szamrej-Baran, I. The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals: The EU Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barcellos-Paula, L.; De la Vega, I.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M. The Quintuple Helix of innovation model and the SDGs: Latin-American countries’ case and its forgotten effects. Mathematics 2021, 9, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kasztelan, A.; Sulich, A. Green Transformation of the Polish Economy. In Modeling Economic Growth in Contemporary Poland; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2023; pp. 51–73. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chaaben, N.; Elleuch, Z.; Hamdi, B.; Kahouli, B. Green economy performance and sustainable development achievement: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 549–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. AlArjani, A.; Modibbo, U.M.; Ali, I.; Sarkar, B. A new framework for the sustainable development goals of Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alwakid, W.; Aparicio, S.; Urbano, D. Cultural antecedents of green entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia: An institutional approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, B.; Zhou, Y. Measuring the green economic growth in China: Influencing factors and policy perspectives. Energy 2022, 241, 122518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Usubiaga-Liano, A.; Ekins, P. Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental sustainability index. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 132, 108281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, K. Quantitative Social Research Methods; Sage: New Delhi, India, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Grant, C.; Osanloo, A. Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your “house”. Adm. Issues J. 2014, 4, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Adeoye-Olatunde, O.A.; Olenik, N.L. Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. J. Am. Coll. Clin. Pharm. 2021, 4, 1358–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hennink, M.; Kaiser, B.N. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc. Sci. Med. 2022, 292, 114523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Castro, N.R.; Chousa, J.P. An integrated framework for the financial analysis of sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2006, 15, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nowell, L.S.; Norris, J.M.; White, D.E.; Moules, N.J. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2017, 16, 1609406917733847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amran, Y.A.; Amran, Y.M.; Alyousef, R.; Alabduljabbar, H. Renewable and sustainable energy production in Saudi Arabia according to Saudi Vision 2030; Current status and future prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 247, 119602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bengo, I.; Boni, L.; Sancino, A. EU financial regulations and social impact measurement practices: A comprehensive framework on finance for sustainable development. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2022, 29, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kemfert, C.; Schmalz, S. Sustainable finance: Political challenges of development and implementation of framework conditions. Green Financ. 2019, 1, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Falcone, P.M.; Sica, E. The role of sustainable finance during the global health crisis: Transformative innovation policies for environmental and social sustainability. In Sustainable Finance and the Global Health Crisis; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 43–54. [Google Scholar]
  37. Falcone, P.M.; Morone, P.; Sica, E. Greening of the financial system and fuelling a sustainability transition: A discursive approach to assess landscape pressures on the Italian financial system. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 127, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ziolo, M.; Filipiak, B.Z.; Bąk, I.; Cheba, K. How to design more sustainable financial systems: The roles of environmental, social, and governance factors in the decision-making process. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Busch, T.; Lewandowski, S. Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2018, 22, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vazquez-Brust, D.; Piao, R.S.; Melo, M.F.d.S.d.; Yaryd, R.T.; Carvalho, M.M. The governance of collaboration for sustainable development: Exploring the “black box”. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Scholtens, B. Why Finance Should Care about Ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2017, 32, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gerlich, M. How Short-Term Orientation Dominates Western Businesses and the Challenges They Face—An Example Using Germany, the UK, and the USA. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Epstein, M.J. The challenge of simultaneously improving social and financial performances: New research results. In Performance Measurement and Management Control: Innovative Concepts and Practices; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2010; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  44. Epstein, M.J.; Buhovac, A.R. Solving the sustainability implementation challenge. Organ. Dyn. 2010, 39, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dusík, J.; Bond, A. Environmental assessments and sustainable finance frameworks: Will the EU Taxonomy change the mindset over the contribution of EIA to sustainable development? Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2022, 40, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Berjawi, A.E.H.; Walker, S.L.; Patsios, C.; Hosseini, S.H.R. An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: A whole energy systems approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nedopil, C.; Dordi, T.; Weber, O. The Nature of Global Green Finance Standards—Evolution, Differences, and Three Models. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taghizadeh-Hesary, F.; Yoshino, N. Sustainable solutions for green financing and investment in renewable energy projects. Energies 2020, 13, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Finger, M.; Gavious, I.; Manos, R. Environmental risk management and financial performance in the banking industry: A cross-country comparison. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 2018, 52, 240–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Clark, G.L.; Feiner, A.; Viehs, M. From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. SSRN 2015, 2508281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zadek, S.; Flynn, C. South-Originating Green Finance: Exploring the Potential, The Geneva International Finance Dialogues. Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev. Swiss 2013, 30, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  52. D’amato, D.; Korhonen, J. Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 188, 107143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sullivan, A.; White, D.D.; Larson, K.L.; Wutich, A. Towards water sensitive cities in the Colorado River Basin: A comparative historical analysis to inform future urban water sustainability transitions. Sustainability 2017, 9, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhejaili, M.O. Integrating Climate Change Risks and Sustainability Goals into Saudi Arabia’s Financial Regulation: Pathways to Green Finance. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104159

AMA Style

Alhejaili MO. Integrating Climate Change Risks and Sustainability Goals into Saudi Arabia’s Financial Regulation: Pathways to Green Finance. Sustainability. 2024; 16(10):4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alhejaili, Mohammad Omar. 2024. "Integrating Climate Change Risks and Sustainability Goals into Saudi Arabia’s Financial Regulation: Pathways to Green Finance" Sustainability 16, no. 10: 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop