Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (17)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = vertebral body tethering

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 626 KiB  
Article
Reactive Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Motion Analysis Study
by Ria Paradkar, Christina Regan, Kathie Bernhardt, Kenton R. Kaufman, Todd A. Milbrandt and A. Noelle Larson
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1715; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051715 - 4 Mar 2025
Viewed by 961
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Traditional fusion leads to a loss of spine mobility across the fused vertebrae. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) was developed with the goal of increasing flexibility and maintaining some spinal mobility. However, it is not known if the additional mobility leads to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Traditional fusion leads to a loss of spine mobility across the fused vertebrae. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) was developed with the goal of increasing flexibility and maintaining some spinal mobility. However, it is not known if the additional mobility leads to significant functional improvement. This prospective motion analysis study evaluates functional outcomes, specifically gait stability, in pre-operative, post-fusion, and post-VBT patients by using postural perturbations on a treadmill. Methods: Overall, 79 subjects underwent a computer-controlled treadmill study with postural perturbations, which simulated trips and slips. The subjects were harnessed for safety. Overall, 21 subjects were healthy controls, 18 patients were at least one-year post-VBT, 15 patients were at least one-year post-fusion, and 25 were pre-operative scoliosis patients. Subject weight, height, and treadmill acceleration were recorded and used to determine anteroposterior single (ASSTs, PSSTs) and multiple (AMSTs, PMSTs) stepping thresholds to describe the maximum torque a patient could withstand before failing to recover from the simulated trip. Independent t-tests were run to compare groups under the advice of a master statistician with expertise in orthopedic surgery. Results: Pre-operative scoliosis patients had lower PSSTs than healthy controls (uncorrected p = 0.036). No significant differences were observed between pre-operative and post-operative groups for both fusion and VBT. There was no significant difference in ASST, AMST, or PMST between any of the groups. Conclusions: The lower PSST in pre-operative scoliosis patients compared to healthy controls may reflect impaired reactive balance and potentially increased fall risk. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in reactive balance measures between pre-operative and post-operative scoliosis patients or between post-fusion and post-VBT patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 552 KiB  
Article
Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (AVBT) in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Retrospective Study
by Massimo Balsano, Andrea Vacchiano, Mauro Spina, Federico Lodi, Pietro Criveller, Fabio Zoccatelli, Alberto Corbolini, Antonio Gioele Colombini, Alessio Campisi, Riccardo Giovannetti and Maurizio Valentino Infante
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7786; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247786 - 20 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1343
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (AVBT) is a relatively novel minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) that enables deformity correction of the spine diminishing vertebral motion reduction caused by the standard posterior spinal fusion approach. This [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (AVBT) is a relatively novel minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) that enables deformity correction of the spine diminishing vertebral motion reduction caused by the standard posterior spinal fusion approach. This paper reports the introduction of a new technical variant of AVBT, with the aim of evaluating its effectiveness on the correction of both axial and coronal spinal deformity. Methods: A single-centre single-surgeon retrospective cohort study was conducted. AVBTs were performed between 2020 and 2024. Radiographical values, surgical details, and complications of 67 patients affected by AIS were compared before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at the most recent follow-up. Results: Postoperative results have revealed a statistically significant coronal curve correction of 29.85% in the main thoracic (MT) curves (from mean preoperative width of 54.81 ± 11.86° to 38.45 ± 10.19°) and of 26.93% in the thoracolumbar (TL/L) curves (from 35.15 ± 11.83° to 25.69 ± 10.50°) in line with that obtained by the standard technique. Coronal correction at the most recent follow-up was maintained. Postoperative axial rotation reduction was found to be statistically significant in the main thoracic (MT) curves (from mean Nash-Moe value of 1.84 ± 0.71 to 1.36 ± 0.73), with a further decrease at the most recent follow-up compared with preoperative values. Improvement in other radiographical measures did not reach statistical significance and the complication rate was comparable to the standard technique. Conclusions: The extent of coronal correction in patients treated with the proposed modified AVBT technique is satisfactory and in line with results from studies testing the standard AVBT technique. The findings of this study seem to suggest that this technical variant of AVBT is effective in the correction of both axial and coronal deformity, with a surgical complication rate comparable to the standard technique. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 6579 KiB  
Article
Vertebral Body Tethering for Thoracolumbar Curvatures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes at 2–6-Year Follow-Up
by Lily Eaker, Olgerta Mucollari, Noor Maza and Baron Lonner
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6330; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216330 - 23 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1747
Abstract
Background: The gold standard treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, long-term consequences of PSF can include reduced spinal flexibility, back pain, and intervertebral disc degeneration. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative that preserves motion. We [...] Read more.
Background: The gold standard treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, long-term consequences of PSF can include reduced spinal flexibility, back pain, and intervertebral disc degeneration. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion alternative that preserves motion. We investigated the outcomes of VBT for the treatment of thoracolumbar (TL) major AIS in the largest single-surgeon series with a minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center review. Inclusion criteria were AIS, Lenke 5/6 curvature, and skeletally immature Variables were compared using Student’s t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: A total of 37 consecutive patients, age 14.1 ± 1.6 years, 86.5% F, 35.9 ± 11.5-month FU, were examined. Overall, 27 patients (73%) had Lenke 5 and 10 (27%) had Lenke 6 curvatures. Instrumentation of the TL curve alone was performed in 59.5%, and thoracic (T) and TL in 40.5% of patients. Overall, 45.9% of patients had two tethers placed in the TL spine; no patients had double tethers placed at the main thoracic curves. The TL (51 ± 8° to 20 ± 11°; p < 0.0001) and T (37 ± 13° to 17 ± 10°; p < 0.0001) curvatures improved from baseline to the latest FU. Overall, 89% of patients achieved major Cobb < 35°; the three patients who did not experienced at least one cord breakage or required PSF. T5-T12 kyphosis increased (p = 0.0401) and lumbar lordosis was maintained (p = 0.9236). Both the TL inclinometer (16 ± 4º to 4 ± 2°; p < 0.0001) and T (6 ± 4° to 4 ± 3°; p = 0.0036) measurements improved. There was a 49% tether breakage rate as follows: 60% for single-cord TL constructs and 35% for double cords (p = 0.0991). There was an 8.1% re-operation rate as follows: one conversion to T PSF and revision of the TL tether; one release of the T tether and revision of the TL tether; one screw revision for radiculopathy. One patient was re-admitted for poor pain control. Conclusions: Patients with TL major curvature treated with VBT experienced a high rate of clinically successful outcomes with maintenance of lumbar lordosis and relatively low complication rates at the latest FU. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4811 KiB  
Review
Current Concepts in the Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis
by Alexandra N. Johnson and Robert K. Lark
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4472; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154472 - 31 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2618
Abstract
Despite many surgical advances in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past two decades, this condition remains a challenge to address. While otherwise healthy children can have EOS, many of these patients have complicated comorbidities making proper treatment algorithms extraordinarily [...] Read more.
Despite many surgical advances in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past two decades, this condition remains a challenge to address. While otherwise healthy children can have EOS, many of these patients have complicated comorbidities making proper treatment algorithms extraordinarily difficult. Non-operative measures can be successful when initiated early, but are many times utilized as a delay tactic until growth-friendly operative procedures can be safely performed. This article will summarize the current concepts in the treatment of EOS with a focus on the surgical advances that have recently been made. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1603 KiB  
Article
How Long Can You Delay? Curve Progression While Awaiting Vertebral Body Tethering Surgery
by Christina Regan, M. Bryant Transtrum, Bharadwaj Jilakara, Todd A. Milbrandt and A. Noelle Larson
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2209; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082209 - 11 Apr 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1235
Abstract
Background: The implications of delaying surgical intervention for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) wishing to undergo vertebral body tethering (VBT) have not yet been explored. It is important to understand how these delays can impact surgical planning and patient outcomes. Methods [...] Read more.
Background: The implications of delaying surgical intervention for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) wishing to undergo vertebral body tethering (VBT) have not yet been explored. It is important to understand how these delays can impact surgical planning and patient outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review that analyzed all AIS patients treated between 2015 and 2021 at a single tertiary center. Time to surgery from initial surgical consultation and ultimate surgical plan were assessed. Patient characteristics, potential risk factors associated with increased curve progression, and reasons for delay were also analyzed. Results: 174 patients were evaluated and 95 were scheduled for VBT. Four patients later required a change to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) due to excessive curve progression. Patients requiring PSF were shown to have significantly longer delays than those who received VBT. Additionally, longer delays, younger age, greater curve progression, and lower skeletal maturity were correlated with significant curve progression (≥5 degrees). Conclusions: Surgical delays for AIS patients awaiting VBT may lead to significant curve progression and necessitate more invasive procedures. Patients with longer delays experienced an increased risk of needing PSF instead of VBT. Of those requiring PSF, the majority were due to insurance denials. Optimizing surgical timing and shared decision-making among patients, families, and healthcare providers are essential for achieving the best outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 697 KiB  
Systematic Review
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review
by Athanasios I. Tsirikos, Kaustubh Ahuja and Mohsin Khan
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2013; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072013 - 29 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1934
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have gained popularity as a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for degenerative, traumatic, and metastatic spinal pathologies. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, MIS techniques comprise anterior thoracoscopic surgery (ATS), posterior minimally invasive surgery (PMIS), and vertebral [...] Read more.
Background: Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have gained popularity as a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for degenerative, traumatic, and metastatic spinal pathologies. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, MIS techniques comprise anterior thoracoscopic surgery (ATS), posterior minimally invasive surgery (PMIS), and vertebral body tethering (VBT). In the current systematic review, the authors collected and analyzed data from the available literature on MIS techniques in AIS. Methods: The articles were shortlisted after a thorough electronic and manual database search through PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Results: The authors included 43 studies for the review; 14 described the outcomes with ATS, 13 with PMIS, and 16 with VBT. Conclusions: While the efficacy of the ATS approach is well-established in terms of comparable coronal and sagittal correction to posterior spinal fusion, the current use of ATS for instrumented fusion has become less popular due to a steep learning curve, high pulmonary and vascular complication rates, implant failures, and increased non-union rates. PMIS is an effective alternative to the standard open posterior spinal fusion, with a steep learning curve and longer surgical time being potential disadvantages. The current evidence, albeit limited, suggests that VBT is an attractive procedure that merits consideration in terms of radiological correction and clinical outcomes, but it has a high complication and re-operation rate, while the most appropriate indications and long-term outcomes of this technique remain unclear. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 12614 KiB  
Article
Posterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Preliminary Study of a New Technique to Correct Lenke 5C Lumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
by Jean-Damien Metaizeau and Delphy Denis
Children 2024, 11(2), 157; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11020157 - 26 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2116
Abstract
Vertebral body tethering has been approved for adolescent scoliosis correction. The usual approach is anterior, which is relatively easy for the thoracic spine, but becomes much more challenging for the lumbar curves, with a higher rate of complications. The purpose of this study [...] Read more.
Vertebral body tethering has been approved for adolescent scoliosis correction. The usual approach is anterior, which is relatively easy for the thoracic spine, but becomes much more challenging for the lumbar curves, with a higher rate of complications. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the first results of a new posterior vertebral body tethering (PVBT) technique using pedicle screws through a posterolateral Wiltse approach. Twenty-two patients with 5C idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke classification) were included in this retrospective study, with a follow up of 2 years after surgery. The lumbar and thoracic curves were measured pre-operatively (POS), at first standing (FS) and at 2 years (2Y). Complications were also analysed. A significant improvement of 30.7° was observed for lumbar curve magnitude between POS and 2Y. Both the thoracic kyphosis and the lumbar lordosis remained stable. Thirteen complications were noted: three led to posterior arthrodesis, three needed a revision with a good outcome, and the seven others (overcorrections, screw breakage or pull-out) achieved a good result. PVBT seems an effective technique for the management of type 5 C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The complication rate seems high but is probably secondary to the learning curve of this new technic as it concerns only the first half of the patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Paediatric Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3065 KiB  
Article
Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with the ApiFix Minimal Invasive Dynamic Correction System—A Preliminary Report of a 24-Month Follow-Up
by Susanne Froehlich, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Biren Desai, Subash Jung Pandey, Herbert Raddatz, Bjoern Lembcke, Annett Klinder and Katrin Osmanski-Zenk
Life 2023, 13(10), 2032; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13102032 - 9 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3310
Abstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional growth disorder. Corrective surgical procedures are the recommended treatment option for a thoracic angle exceeding 50° and a lumbar major curve of 40°. Over the past few years, dynamic growth modulation implants have been developed as [...] Read more.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional growth disorder. Corrective surgical procedures are the recommended treatment option for a thoracic angle exceeding 50° and a lumbar major curve of 40°. Over the past few years, dynamic growth modulation implants have been developed as alternatives to permanent fusion. The ApiFix system was designed as a 2D “posterior dynamic device” for curve correction. After implantation in a minimally invasive procedure, it uses polyaxial joints and a self-adjusting rod to preserve the degree of motion and to accommodate the patient’s growth. It provides an effective method of controlling deformity and fills the gap between the conservative treatment of major curves that are >35° and the fusion procedure. The objective of the two-center cohort study was the analysis of the correction results of patients, who underwent surgical intervention with the ApiFix system. The inclusion criteria were AIS, Lenke type 1 or type 5, a major curve on bending films of ≤30°, and an angle of the major curve of between 35° and 60°. Postoperative radiograph data were obtained longitudinally for up to 24 months of follow-up and compared to preoperative (preop) values. For comparisons of the different time points, non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon) or paired t-tests for normally distributed values were used to analyze repeated measures. Overall, 36 patients (25 female and 11 male) were treated with the ApiFix system from April 2018 to October 2020. Lenke type 1 was identified in 21 (58%) cases and Lenke type 5 was identified in 15 (42%) cases. The average angle of the thoracic major curve for Lenke 1 was 43°. The preoperative lumbar major curve (Lenke 5) was determined to be 43°. Over a follow-up of 24 months, a correction of the major curve to an average of 20° was observed for Lenke 1 and that to an average of 15° was observed for Lenke 5. Lenke type 1 and type 5 showed significant changes in the major curve over the individual test intervals in the paired comparisons compared to the starting angle (Lenke 1: preop—24 months, 0.002; Lenke 5: preop—24 months, 0.043). Overall, 11 events were recorded in the follow-up period, that required revision surgery. We distinguished between repeated interventions required after reaching the maximum distraction length of the implant due to the continued growth of the patient (n = 4) and complications, such as infections or problems associated with the anchorage of the implant (n = 7). The results from the present cohort revealed a statistically significant improvement in the postoperatively measured angles of the major and minor curves in the follow-up after 24 months. Consequently, the results were comparable to those of the already established vertebral body tethering method. Alignment in AIS via dynamic correction systems in combination with a possible growth modulation has been a treatment alternative to surgical fusing procedures for more than a decade. However, the long-term corrective effect has to be validated in further studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4002 KiB  
Article
Posterior Vertebral Pedicular Tethering for the Treatment of Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis
by Jorge Mineiro
Healthcare 2023, 11(13), 1878; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131878 - 28 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2103
Abstract
Over the last decade, there has been a new wave of interest in non-fusion techniques for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. These are not new techniques, as they were first published and presented in the late 1950s, using compression of the convexity [...] Read more.
Over the last decade, there has been a new wave of interest in non-fusion techniques for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. These are not new techniques, as they were first published and presented in the late 1950s, using compression of the convexity or distraction of the concavity of the main curvature. More recently, anterior vertebral body tethering has raised great interest, as although it is a major procedure through the child’s chest, it seems appropriate for the thoracic curves. The main objective of this article is to describe Posterior Vertebral Pedicular Tethering (PVPT) as a “new” technique performed as a less invasive spinal procedure for the treatment of certain thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis in growing adolescents. It is an alternative growth modulation technique appropriate for thoracolumbar and lumbar curvatures where we observe reduction of the three plane deformity of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Paediatric Spinal Deformity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 249 KiB  
Article
Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Skeletally Immature Patients with AIS: Indication for Spinal Fusion at Skeletal Maturity Is Not Obviated in 60% of Cases
by Kiril V. Mladenov, Hans O. Pinnschmidt and Ralf Stücker
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(12), 3933; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123933 - 8 Jun 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1634
Abstract
The role of anterior vertebral body tethering (aVBT) in obviating the need for spinal fusion in patients with AIS remains unclear, and a large amount of variation exists in the data among different studies. The present study aims to investigate and analyze what [...] Read more.
The role of anterior vertebral body tethering (aVBT) in obviating the need for spinal fusion in patients with AIS remains unclear, and a large amount of variation exists in the data among different studies. The present study aims to investigate and analyze what factors have a potential influence on aVBT outcome. Skeletally immature patients with AIS who underwent aVBT for scoliosis correction were followed up until skeletal maturity. The mean age at the time of surgery was 13.4 ± 1.1, and the mean follow-up time was 2.5 ± 0.5 years. The Cobb angle of the main curve was 46.6 ± 9° at the time of surgery and was significantly corrected to 17.7 ± 10.4° (p < 0.001) immediately postoperatively. A significant loss of correction was observed during the latest follow-up (Cobb angle 33.8 ± 18.7°; p < 0.001). An indication for spinal fusion at skeletal maturity was not obviated in 60% of the patients. The factors identified as having an influence on the outcome were preoperative bone age and the magnitude of the major curve. Patients with advanced bone age and larger curves were more likely to reach an indication for spinal fusion at skeletal maturity. In conclusion, no general recommendation for aVBT can be made for AIS patients. The method can be discussed as a treatment option in skeletally very immature preadolescent patients (Sanders Stadium ≤ 2) with a moderate Cobb angle (≤50°) who failed previous brace therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
11 pages, 6517 KiB  
Article
Vertebral Body Tethering in AIS Management—A Preliminary Report
by Aurélien Courvoisier, Alice Baroncini, Clément Jeandel, Clémentine Barra, Yan Lefevre, Federico Solla, Richard Gouron, Jean-Damien Métaizeau, Marie-Christine Maximin and Vincent Cunin
Children 2023, 10(2), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020192 - 20 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3451
Abstract
Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a recently developed surgical technique for the treatment of progressive and severe scoliosis in patients with significant growth potential. It has been used since the first exploratory series, which showed encouraging results on the progressive correction of the [...] Read more.
Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a recently developed surgical technique for the treatment of progressive and severe scoliosis in patients with significant growth potential. It has been used since the first exploratory series, which showed encouraging results on the progressive correction of the major curves. This study reports on a retrospective series of 85 patients extracted from a French cohort, with a follow-up at a minimum of two years after a VBT with recent screws-and-tether constructs. The major and compensatory curves were measured pre-operatively, at the 1st standing X-ray, at 1 year, and at the last available follow-up. The complications were also analyzed. A significant improvement was observed in the curve magnitude after surgery. Thanks to growth modulation, both the main and the secondary curves continued to progress over time. Both the thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis remained stable over time. Overcorrection occurred in 11% of the cases. Tether breakage was observed in 2% of the cases and pulmonary complications in 3% of the cases. VBT is an effective technique for the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with residual growth potential. VBT opens an era of a more subtle and patient-specific surgical management of AIS that considers parameters such as flexibility and growth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Orthopedics & Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1524 KiB  
Review
Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Scoliosis: Historical Origins and Review of Current Techniques
by Andrew M. Block, Lisa M. Tamburini, Francine Zeng, Michael R. Mancini, Casey A. Jackson, Christopher L. Antonacci, Owen P. Karsmarski, John W. Stelzer, Ian J. Wellington and Mark C. Lee
Bioengineering 2022, 9(10), 600; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9100600 - 21 Oct 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4878
Abstract
The treatment of scoliosis has been explored and debated in medicine since the first recorded texts. Scoliosis treatment has shifted over time from external modalities, such as traction and bracing, to internal stabilization techniques that leverage surgical advances. Surgical fixation constructs can generally [...] Read more.
The treatment of scoliosis has been explored and debated in medicine since the first recorded texts. Scoliosis treatment has shifted over time from external modalities, such as traction and bracing, to internal stabilization techniques that leverage surgical advances. Surgical fixation constructs can generally be separated into two different modalities: dynamic vs. static constructs. For skeletally immature individuals with progressive deformities, surgical options range from traditional or magnetically controlled growing rods to vertebral body staples or tethering. For individuals who have reached skeletal maturity, many devices have been developed that provide static length constructs. Understanding the surgical options available is critical for the appropriate management of this varied patient population. With this article, we sought to provide a summary of past and present techniques and devices used in the treatment of scoliosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5391 KiB  
Article
Reactivation of Vertebral Growth Plate Function in Vertebral Body Tethering in an Animal Model
by Michał Latalski, Tomasz Szponder, Grzegorz Starobrat, Edward Warda, Magdalena Wójciak, Sławomir Dresler, Anna Danielewicz, Jan Sawicki and Ireneusz Sowa
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11596; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911596 - 30 Sep 2022
Viewed by 3406
Abstract
Flexible spine tethering is a relatively novel fusionless surgical technique that aims to correct scoliosis based on growth modulation due to the pressure exerted on the vertebral body epiphyseal growth plate. The correction occurs in two phases: immediate intraoperative and postoperative with growth. [...] Read more.
Flexible spine tethering is a relatively novel fusionless surgical technique that aims to correct scoliosis based on growth modulation due to the pressure exerted on the vertebral body epiphyseal growth plate. The correction occurs in two phases: immediate intraoperative and postoperative with growth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reactivation of vertebral growth plate function after applying corrective forces. The rat tail model was used. Asymmetric compression and distraction of caudal growth plates were performed using a modified external fixation apparatus. Radiological and histopathological data were analysed. After three weeks of correction, the activity of the structures increased across the entire growth plate width, and the plate was thickened. The height of the hypertrophic layer and chondrocytes on the concave side doubled in height. The height of chondrocytes and the cartilage thickness on the concave and central sides after the correction did not differ statistically significantly from the control group. Initiation of the correction of scoliosis in the growing spine, with relief of the pressure on the growth plate, allows the return of the physiological activity of the growth cartilage and restoration of the deformed vertebral body. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3060 KiB  
Article
Pulmonary Complications after Vertebral Body Tethering: Incidence, Treatment, Outcomes and Risk Factor Analysis
by Per Trobisch, Filippo Migliorini, Thomas Vanspauwen and Alice Baroncini
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(13), 3778; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133778 - 29 Jun 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 3350
Abstract
Introduction: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is gaining popularity for the management of selected AIS patients. The most frequent non-mechanical complications after VBT are pulmonary complications, with a reported incidence of up to 8% for recurrent pleural effusion. However, only trace data have been [...] Read more.
Introduction: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is gaining popularity for the management of selected AIS patients. The most frequent non-mechanical complications after VBT are pulmonary complications, with a reported incidence of up to 8% for recurrent pleural effusion. However, only trace data have been published on this topic. We aimed to analyze the incidence, timing, treatment, outcomes and risk factors of pulmonary complications after VBT. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent VBT between September 2018 and September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The rate of pulmonary complications was analyzed and the symptoms, timing of onset, treatment and outcomes were recorded. An analysis of demographic, radiographic, surgical and pulmonary function data was conducted to explore possible risk factors for pulmonary complications. Results: Data from 140 patients were available: 14 experienced a pulmonary complication 1 day to 6 weeks after VBT, with 9 presenting a recurrent pleural effusion. A total of 13 patients required invasive treatment. All recovered without sequelae. The risk factor analysis did not result in any significant observations. However, 11/14 patients had had a diaphragm split. Conclusion: Pulmonary complications were observed in 10% of patients. The timing, symptoms and required treatment were heterogeneous. Pleural effusion seems to be more common after diaphragm crossing, but evidence is not yet conclusive. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 240 KiB  
Article
Vertebral Body Tethering in 49 Adolescent Patients after Peak Height Velocity for the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: 2–5 Year Follow-Up
by James Meyers, Lily Eaker, Jessica Zhang, Theodor di Pauli von Treuheim and Baron Lonner
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(11), 3161; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113161 - 2 Jun 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4188
Abstract
Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) that elicits correction via growth modulation in skeletally immature patients. VBT after peak height velocity is controversial and is the subject of this study. A retrospective review of Risser [...] Read more.
Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) that elicits correction via growth modulation in skeletally immature patients. VBT after peak height velocity is controversial and is the subject of this study. A retrospective review of Risser 3–5 AIS patients treated with VBT, and min. 2-year FU was performed. Pre to post-op changes in clinical outcomes were compared using Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney test. A total of 49 patients met criteria, age 15.0 ± 1.9 years, FU 32.5 ± 9.1 months. For thoracic (T) major curvatures, T curvature improved from 51.1 ± 6.9° to 27.2° ± 8.1° (p < 0.01) and TL from 37.2° ± 10.7° to 19.2° ± 6.8° (p < 0.01). For thoracolumbar (TL) major curvatures, T improved from 37.2° ± 10.7° to 18.8° ± 9.4° (p < 0.01) and TL from 49.0° ± 6.4° to 20.1° ± 8.5° (p < 0.01). Major curve inclinometer measurements and SRS-22 domains, except activity, improved significantly (p ≤ 0.05). At the latest FU, one (2%) patient required fusion of the T curve and revision of the TL tether due to curve progression in the previously uninstrumented T curve and tether breakage (TB) in the TL. Twenty (41%) patients experienced TB. VBT in AIS patients with limited remaining skeletal growth resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes at the latest FU. Full article
Back to TopTop