Search Results (22)

The role of soft tissue reconstruction in infection control of knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with a two-stage exchange strategy remains controversial. This retrospective observational study analysed consecutive patients with chronic knee PJI managed with a two-stage protocol between 2010 and 2023, comparing outcomes between cases requiring flap-based soft tissue reconstruction and those achieving primary closure. A total of 118 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. Forty patients (33.9%) required soft tissue reconstruction (STR), including 25 pedicled medial gastrocnemius flaps and 15 anterolateral thigh (ALT) microsurgical free flaps. Patients requiring STR showed greater baseline complexity, with a higher number of previous surgical procedures (3.03 vs. 2.08; p = 0.0057) and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and sinus tracts. Despite this, infection control was superior compared with non-reconstructed cases (100% vs. 88.5%; p = 0.029). Within the STR group, both pedicled and microsurgical techniques achieved complete infection eradication; however, ALT flaps were associated with higher complication rates (46.7%), with partial flap necrosis being the most frequent event. The use of microsurgical reconstruction increased progressively over time, reflecting growing reconstructive complexity. Formal soft tissue reconstruction does not compromise and may facilitate infection control within a multidisciplinary pathway. Full article

Background/Objectives: The optimal duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy for bone and orthopaedic implant infections remains undefined. The SALATIO Trials are prospective randomised trials investigating whether shorter antibiotic courses are non-inferior to standard durations across different infection strata. This report presents the second interim analysis. Methods: Two unblinded non-inferiority RCTs were conducted (intention-to-treat population). Primary outcomes were remission, clinical failure, and microbiologically identical recurrence. In SALATIO 1 (material arm), participants with infected implants, retained or replaced during initial surgery, were randomised to short-course (six weeks) or long-course (twelve weeks) targeted systemic antibiotic therapy following debridement. In SALATIO 2 (non-material arm), participants undergoing implant removal or two-stage exchange were randomised to either a short-course (three weeks) or a long-course (six weeks) of antibiotic therapy. Results: We analysed 175 infections with a minimum follow-up period of one-year from October 2022 until July 2025: 69 (39%) in the material arm (38 short-course [55%], 31 long-course [45%]) and 106 (61%) in the non-material arm (44 short-course [42%], 62 long-course [58%]). No significant differences in clinical failure (19% overall) or microbiological recurrence (7%) were observed between treatment arms in either stratum. Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus and number of debridements—but not antibiotic duration—as independent risk factors for clinical failure. Patients receiving short-course therapy experienced significantly fewer adverse events (median 0 versus 1; p = 0.01). Formal non-inferiority has not yet been achieved due to limited statistical power; the current analysis includes 175 of the 280 episodes (62.5%) required for the final analysis. Conclusions: This interim analysis suggests no disadvantage of shorter antibiotic regimens in surgically treated orthopaedic infections, whilst reducing adverse events. Patient comorbidities and surgical factors appear to be more relevant to treatment outcomes than antibiotic duration. The SALATIO Trials are ongoing and may support improved antibiotic stewardship without compromising outcomes. Trials Registration: NCT05499481. Full article

Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following limb salvage surgery with tumor megaprosthetic reconstruction, leading to high morbidity and complex management. Despite advancements in prosthesis design and materials, infection rates are notably higher than in conventional arthroplasty. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the etiology, diagnosis, and management of PJIs in this unique setting. Methods: We conducted narrative review of literature from PubMed and Embase using keywords related to PJIs and tumor megaprostheses, aiming to summarize risk factors, diagnostic criteria, pathogen profiles, and treatment outcomes. Results: Key findings indicate that the risk of PJI is multifactorial, involving patient-related, disease-related, and treatment-related factors. Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical presentation, serological markers, imaging, and microbiological studies, though established criteria for conventional PJI may require adaptation for tumor cases. Treatment strategies include irrigation and debridement (I&D), debridement, antibiotics, implant retention with modular component exchange (DAIR), one-stage or two-stage revision, and amputation. Success rates vary, and optimal management requires a multidisciplinary, individualized approach. However, two-stage revision is considered the gold standard for chronic PJIs. Conclusions: PJIs after tumor megaprosthetic reconstruction presents distinct challenges. Management requires a multidisciplinary, individualized approach. Future research should focus on validated diagnostic criteria for this population, novel anti-biofilm strategies, and standardized treatment protocols. Full article

Background/Objectives: The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for bacterial prosthetic joint infections (PJI) remains a topic of considerable debate. Current recommendations are often based on limited evidence and expert consensus. Emerging data suggest that shorter antibiotic courses may be as effective as prolonged treatments in select cases. Shortening the duration of therapy offers several advantages, including a reduced risk of bacterial resistance, fewer adverse events, and cost savings. However, this approach must be carefully balanced with the individual patient’s risk of treatment failure. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy in PJIs, according to surgical strategies—DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), one-stage exchange, two-stage exchange, and resection without reimplantation—and to identify parameters that may guide individualized and potentially shortened regimens. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through January 2025, including observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and international guidelines. Reference lists of key articles were also screened. Results: Studies on DAIR suggest that longer regimens (e.g., 8–12 weeks) are necessary, especially in staphylococcal infections, as confirmed by the DATIPO trial, which showed higher failure rates with 6 weeks compared to 12 weeks. Evidence on one-stage exchange is limited but increasingly suggests that 6 weeks may be sufficient in selected patients; however, no dedicated trial has confirmed this. In two-stage exchange, small retrospective series report successful outcomes with short antibiotic therapy combined with local antibiotics, but randomized trials show trends favoring longer regimens. For patients treated with permanent resection arthroplasty, arthrodesis, or amputation, antibiotic durations are highly variable, with few robust data. Across all strategies, most studies are limited by methodological weaknesses, including small sample sizes, retrospective design, lack of microbiological stratification, and heterogeneous outcome definitions. Conclusions: Despite growing interest in shortening antibiotic durations in PJIs, high-quality evidence remains limited. Until additional randomized trials are available—particularly in one- and two-stage exchange settings—12 weeks remains the safest reference duration for most patients, especially those with retained hardware. Future studies should incorporate stratification by infection type, causative organism, and host factors to define tailored and evidence-based antibiotic strategies. Full article

Introduction: Two-stage revision with an antibiotic-loaded, temporary static cement spacer is a common treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee. However, limited data exists on in vivo antibiotic elution kinetics after spacer implantation. This pilot study uses the technique of microdialysis (MD) to collect intra-articular knee samples. The aim was to evaluate MD as an intra-articular sampling method to detect spacer-eluted antibiotics within 72 h after surgery and to determine whether they show specific elution kinetics. Methods: Ten patients (six male, four female; age median 71.5 years) undergoing two-stage revision for knee PJI were included. A MD catheter was inserted into the joint during explantation of the infected inlying implant and implantation of a custom-made static spacer coated with COPAL cement (0.5 g gentamicin (G) and 2 g vancomycin (V)). Over 72 h postoperatively, samples were collected and analyzed for spacer-eluted antibiotics, intravenously administered antibiotics (e.g., cefazolin and cefuroxime), metabolic markers (glucose and lactate), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6). Local and systemic levels were compared. Results: All catheters were positioned successfully and well tolerated for 72 h. Antibiotic concentrations in MD samples peaked within the first 24 h (G: median 9.55 µg/mL [95% CI: 0.4–17.36]; V: 37.57 µg/mL [95% CI: 3.26–81.6]) and decreased significantly over 72 h (for both p < 0.05, G: 4.27 µg/mL [95% CI: 2.26–7.2]; V: 9.69 µg/mL [95% CI: 3.86–24]). MD concentrations consistently exceeded blood levels (p < 0.05), while intravenously administered antibiotics showed higher blood concentrations. Glucose in MD samples decreased from 17.71 mg/dL to 0.89 mg/dL (p < 0.05). IL-6 and lactate concentrations showed no difference between MD and blood samples. Conclusions: Monitoring antibiotics eluted by a static spacer with intra-articular MD for 72 h is feasible. Gentamicin and vancomycin levels remained above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Differentiating infection from surgical response using metabolic and immunological markers remains challenging. Prolonged in vivo studies with MD are required to evaluate extended antibiotic release in two-stage exchanges. Full article

Background: The two-stage septic exchange is the most common therapy concept in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee infections. However, before the second-stage reimplantation can be carried out, the physician has to assess whether or not the eradication of the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been successful. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate possible predictive parameters for the successful treatment of PJI before and at the time of reimplantation. Methods: This study investigated a total of 145 patients with periprosthetic hip infection and 93 patients with periprosthetic knee infection, who all underwent a two-stage septic exchange between 2017 and 2021. In order to identify possible risk factors for reinfections, the patients underwent preoperative examination of serological inflammatory parameters, microbiological and histological examination of the periprosthetic membrane at the time of reimplantation, as well as postoperative evaluations at regular intervals for a period of at least 24 months. Results: During the follow-up period, reinfection occurred in 11.3% of cases after the two-stage septic revision. None of the serological, microbiological, or histological parameters were able to significantly predict the risk of reinfection. Risk factors associated with reinfection were BMI and previous revision surgery. Conclusions: Currently, there is no reliable predictive factor indicating the risk of reinfection at the time of reimplantation. New diagnostic methods need to be developed to evaluate the possibility and timing of endoprosthesis reimplantation. Full article

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The number of cases is increasing among young women, and consequently, breast reconstructions are performed more often. Postoperative complications, wound healing, and the quality of scars influence the final cosmetic outcomes. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of using a negative-pressure therapy compared to a standard dressing on two postoperative wounds in the same woman, after bilateral tissue expander replacement surgery—when identical healing conditions occur. Methods: This study includes a single-center evaluation of the application of two different dressings during bilateral exchanges of tissue expanders with breast implants. The study included 22 patients with a history of breast cancer after bilateral mastectomy with two-stage reconstruction. During the second stage, a sNPWT was applied to one breast and a standard dressing to the other. Results: A statistically significant difference in skin elasticity in favor of sNPWT was visible after 7 days, while the greatest difference was visible in the evaluation after 6 months (mean of 0.806 vs. 0.607). A difference in temperature measurements was shown 7 days after the procedure. However, after 30 days, these measurements were similar. There was also a reduced incidence of postoperative complications as well as seroma accumulation in the breasts with negative pressure. Conclusions: The results indicate faster healing, better scar quality, and improved skin elasticity in breasts with sNPWT compared to the standard dressing. The number of postoperative complications were also reduced, which is especially important in high-risk patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study explores the long-term clinical outcomes of antibiotic-impregnated calcium hydroxyapatite (CHA) as an antibiotic delivery system in treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 12 patients (13 hips) who were treated with antibiotic-impregnated CHA for PJI after THA and followed for more than 10 years at our institution between 1999 and 2011. The study group comprised six men (seven hips) and six women, with a mean age of 61.4 years. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 13.8 years. After irrigation and debridement with modular component exchange, seven hips in six patients underwent revision surgery; however, PJI relapsed in two hips of two patients with a history of diabetes. Two-stage revision surgery was performed on the two relapsed hips and six scheduled hips with antibiotic-impregnated CHA used to treat all cases of PJI. Infection control (100% rate) was achieved in all joints, and revision surgeries were completed. Two patients died 12 years after the initial procedure, and one died 14 years after the first procedure due to unrelated internal diseases; no infection recurrence was observed. No complications related to antibiotic-impregnated CHA were observed. Conclusions: Our results indicate that antibiotic-impregnated CHA is associated with high success rates in treating PJI after THA, even in cases with advanced disease, and yields satisfactory functional outcomes postoperatively. Full article

Introduction: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are difficult to treat and represent a significant burden to the healthcare system. Two-stage revision surgery with placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer is currently the gold standard for treatment in the United States for late-onset infections. We evaluate the efficacy of varying doses of vancomycin added to antibiotic-containing acrylic cement spacers and discuss the biomechanical and antimicrobial properties of using high versus low doses of vancomycin in cement spacers in the hip and knee. Materials and Methods: Commercially available Copal cement containing either gentamicin and clindamycin (G + C) or gentamicin and vancomycin (G + V) was prepared with the manual addition of low (2 g) and high (6 g) doses of vancomycin. In vitro mechanical testing was then carried out according to ISO 5833 and DIN 53435, as well as inhibition zone assays against common PJI pathogens. Additionally, inhibition zone assays were conducted on two commercially available prefabricated spacers containing gentamicin: Copal Exchange G and Cemex Spacer-K. Results: In biomechanical testing, Copal G + V with the addition of 6 g of vancomycin failed to meet the ISO standard. Copal G + C and Copal G + V with low and high dosages of vancomycin were all effective against the tested pathogens and displayed constant efficacy for a duration of 42 days. High doses of vancomycin showed significantly lower mechanical stability. Moreover, Copal Exchange G showed significantly larger inhibition zones across 42 days. Discussion: While higher concentrations of vancomycin appear to improve the antimicrobial efficacy of cement, they also reduce its mechanical stability. Despite its smoother surface, the Copal Exchange G spacer exhibits large inhibition zones after 1 day and maintains consistently large inhibition zones over 6 weeks. Thus, it may be preferred for use in two-stage revision surgery. Conclusion: Copal Exchange G is more effective than Cemex Spacer K against S. aureus and E. coli. The manual addition of vancomycin to cement containing double antibiotics is very effective. The influence on ISO compression is low, the ISO bending modulus is increased, and ISO bending, DIN bending, and DIN impact, are reduced. Full article

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty is a serious complication lacking evidence-based diagnostic and treatment protocols, particularly in ruling out persisting infection before reimplantation. Methods: This retrospective analysis assessed the mid-term outcomes of 66 patients undergoing septic two-stage knee revision surgeries from 2007 to 2013, diagnosed as per the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. After implant removal and antibiotic treatment, reimplantation decisions were based on either joint aspiration, blood counts, and clinical examination (group A) or an open biopsy (group B). Both groups underwent meticulous debridement and spacer exchange during the interim period. Results: Late re-infection occurred in 12.1% of all patients. In group A, 13.8% experienced late re-infection, with 14.3% in subgroup A1 and 13.3% in subgroup A2. In group B, 10% had a late re-infection. No significant difference in re-infection or complication rates was found between the groups. Conclusions: The study did not demonstrate the superiority of group B’s approach of open biopsy over group A’s joint aspiration, clinical examination, and blood counts in preventing re-infection or reducing complications. Full article

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that develops after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), whose incidence is expected to increase over the years. Traditionally, surgical treatment of PJI has been based on algorithms, where early infections are preferably treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and late infections with two-stage revision surgery. Two-stage revision is considered the “gold standard” for treatment of chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as it enables local delivery of antibiotics, maintenance of limb-length and mobility, and easier reimplantation. Many studies have attempted to identify potential predicting factors for early diagnosis of PJI, but its management remains challenging. In this observational retrospective study, we investigated the potential role of inflammatory blood markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI)) as prognostic factors in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted, collecting clinical data and laboratory parameters from patients submitted to prosthetic explantation (EP) for chronic PJI. Laboratory parameters (PCR, NLR, MLR, PLR, SIRI, SII, and AISI) were evaluated at the explantation time; at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery; and at reimplantation time. The correlation between laboratory parameters and surgery success was evaluated and defined as infection absence/resolution at the last follow-up. Results: A total of 57 patients with PJI were evaluated (62% males; average age 70 years, SD 12.14). Fifty-three patients with chronic PJI were included. Nine patients underwent DAIR revision surgery and chronic suppressive therapy; two patients died. Nineteen patients completed the two-stage revision process (prosthetic removal, spacer placement, and subsequent replanting). Among them, none showed signs of reinfection or persistence of infection at the last available follow-up. The other twenty-three patients did not replant due to persistent infection: among them, some (the most) underwent spacer retention; others (fewer in number) were submitted to resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis (Girdlestone technique) or chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy; the remaining were, over time, lost to follow-up. Of the patients who concluded the two-stage revision, the ones with high SIRI values (mean 3.08 SD 1.7 and p-value 0.04) and MLR values (mean 0.4 SD 0.2 and p-value 0.02) at the explantation time were associated with a higher probability of infection resolution. Moreover, higher variation in the SIRI and PCR, also defined, respectively, as delta-SIRI (mean −2.3 SD 1.8 and p-value 0.03) and delta-PCR (mean −46 SD 35.7 and p-value 0.03), were associated with favorable outcomes. Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that, in patients with PJI undergoing EP, the SIRI and MLR values and delta-SIRI and delta-PCR values could be predictive of a favorable outcome. The evaluation of these laboratory indices, especially their determination at 4 weeks after removal, could therefore help to determine which patients could be successfully replanted and to identify the best time to replant. More studies analyzing a wider cohort of patients with chronic PJI are needed to validate the promising results of this study. Full article

This study aimed to compare functional outcomes after two-stage revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with the results of primary RSA. Patients affected by PJI and treated by means of two-stage revision RSA were 1:1 matched with a group of patients who were treated electively with RSA without developing any complications. Out of 1477 RSAs performed between 2009 and 2021, 16 patients developed a PJI. Each matched cohort comprised 16 patients (3 females, 13 males). The mean age was 69.13 ± 5.43 years old in the PJI group and 70.28 ± 5.04 (p = 0.543) in the matched cohort. The mean follow-up was 41.23 ± 26.9 months in the PJI group and 28.5 ± 20.2 (p = 0.142) in the matched group. Only one patient showed recurrent PJI five years after revision RSA. Comparison between the PJI patients and matched patients did not show any significant differences at the latest follow-up, nor for subjective shoulder value (SSV) (p = 0.101) or Constant score (p = 0.134). Two-stage exchange RSA for PJI allows for appropriate control of the disease and good functional outcomes. Comparison with an age- and sex-matched cohort of uninfected patients showed no significant differences, thus confirming the idea that revision surgeries may lead to satisfactory functional outcomes, as expected after primary surgery. Full article

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common mode of failure of megaprostheses, yet the literature on the topic is scarce, and studies report conflicting data regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Patients with megaprostheses PJI are often immunosuppressed, and surgeons must balance the trade-off between treatment efficacy and morbidity associated with the surgery aiming for infection eradication. Our review on megaprostheses PJI focuses on two axes: (1) risk factors and preventative strategies; and (2) surgical strategies to manage this condition. Risk factors were classified as either unmodifiable or modifiable. Attempts to decrease the risk of PJI should target the latter group. Strategies to prevent PJI include the use of silver-coated implants, timely discontinuation of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and adequate soft tissue coverage to diminish the amount of dead space. Regarding surgical treatment, main strategies include debridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR), DAIR with modular component exchange, stem retention (DAIR plus), one-stage, and two-stage revision. Two-stage revision is the “gold standard” for PJI in conventional implants; however, its success hinges on adequate soft tissue coverage and willingness of patients to tolerate a spacer for a minimum of 6 weeks. DAIR plus and one-stage revisions may be appropriate for a select group of patients who cannot endure the morbidity of two surgeries. Moreover, whenever DAIR is considered, exchange of the modular components should be performed (DAIR plus). Due to the low volume of megaprostheses implanted, studies assessing PJI should be conducted in a multi-institutional fashion. This would allow for more meaningful comparison of groups, with sufficient statistical power. Level of evidence: IV. Full article

(1) Background: In the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), the individual host status and previous surgical procedures appear to have a relevant influence on success rates and clinical outcome of knee revision surgery. Current data about the predictive value are limited in this subgroup of patients. (2) Methods: Retrospectively, 107 patients (109 knees) undergoing two-stage exchange knee arthroplasty for PJI using a rotating-hinge design with at least two years follow-up. The cumulative incidence (CI) for different endpoints was estimated with death as competing risk. Univariate and multivariate analyses for potential predictive factors were performed. Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical outcome were evaluated. (3) Results: At 8 years, the CI of any revision was 29.6%, and of any reoperation was 38.9%. Significant predictors for risk of re-revision were the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the number of previous surgical procedures prior to explanation of the infected implant. The functional and clinical outcome demonstrated acceptable results in the present cohort with a high comorbidity level. (4) Conclusions: A compromised host status and multiple previous surgical procedures were identified as negative predictors for re-revision knee surgery in the treatment of PJI. Reinfection remained the major reason for re-revision. Overall mortality was high. Full article

Background: Two-stage exchange (TSE) arthroplasty is currently considered the gold standard for chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), despite a failure rate reported in up to 10% of patients. Little is known about the risk factors that may compromise successful TSE arthroplasty management in such patients. The main purpose of the current study was to highlight the potential risk factors of patients with chronic PJIs after THA managed by implant removal, outlining the differences between reimplanted patients and those that were never reimplanted because of a non-eradicated infection. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patient candidates for TSE arthroplasty surgery, managed at the authors’ institution, over a four-year timeframe. The data were retrieved from the hospital’s information database. The enrolled population was divided into two Groups: A, reimplanted; B, non-reimplanted because of a non-eradicated infection within one year. For each Group, demographic information, PJI-related risk factors, type of pathogen and presence of single or polymicrobial infection, were collected and analyzed. Results: In total, 21 patients were included in the study, 14 patients in Group A and 7 in Group B. Major Depression (p = 0.049) and polymicrobial infection (p = 0.04) were more commonly observed in patients that were not reimplanted in the study period. No differences between the two groups were observed when other characteristics were compared. Conclusions: Patients with major depression, or those hosting polymicrobial periprosthetic hip infections, are more susceptible to failure of TSE arthroplasty procedures for chronic PJIs, hampering THA reimplantation. Current findings may drive further research and contribute to the understanding of the role of these risk factors in chronic PJI patients. Full article