Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (11)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = telavancin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 637 KiB  
Review
Structural Innovations in Vancomycin: Overcoming Resistance and Expanding the Antibacterial Spectrum
by Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez, Felipe Morales-León, Franco Valdebenito-Maturana, Pablo Sáez-Riquelme, Nicolás Rodríguez-Ortíz and Hernán Carrillo-Bestagno
Organics 2025, 6(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/org6030028 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 837
Abstract
Vancomycin, a cornerstone antibiotic against severe Gram-positive infections, is increasingly challenged by resistance in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin Enterococcus spp. (VRE), necessitating the development of novel therapeutic strategies. This review examines how structural modifications to vancomycin can enhance its antibacterial activity [...] Read more.
Vancomycin, a cornerstone antibiotic against severe Gram-positive infections, is increasingly challenged by resistance in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin Enterococcus spp. (VRE), necessitating the development of novel therapeutic strategies. This review examines how structural modifications to vancomycin can enhance its antibacterial activity and explores the critical role of computational approaches in designing the next generation of analogs. By analyzing the existing literature, we highlight how strategic alterations, such as the introduction of lipophilic side chains, substitutions on the sugar moieties, and modifications to the aglycone core, have yielded derivatives with improved antibacterial potency. Notably, certain analogs (e.g., Vanc-83, Dipi-Van-Zn) have demonstrated expanded activity against Gram-negative bacteria and exhibited enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles, including prolonged half-lives and improved tissue penetration, crucial for effective treatment. Semisynthetic glycopeptides like telavancin, dalbavancin, and oritavancin exemplify successful translation of structural modifications, offering sustained plasma concentrations and simplified dosing regimens that improve patient compliance. Complementing these experimental efforts, computational methods, including molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations, provide valuable insights into drug–target interactions, guiding the rational design of more effective analogs. Furthermore, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling aids in predicting the in vivo behavior and optimizing the pharmacokinetic properties of these novel compounds. This review highlights a critical path forward in the fight against multidrug-resistant infections. By meticulously examining the previously carried out structural refinement of vancomycin, guided by computational predictions and validated through rigorous experimental testing, we underscore its immense potential. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2759 KiB  
Systematic Review
Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotics in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
by Qi Liu, Dongxia He, Lei Wang, Yuewei Wu, Xian Liu, Yahan Yang, Zhizhi Chen, Zhan Dong, Ying Luo and Yuzhu Song
Antibiotics 2024, 13(9), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090866 - 10 Sep 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4871
Abstract
Background: Vancomycin is a first-line drug for the treatment of MRSA infection. However, overuse of vancomycin can cause bacteria to become resistant, forming resistant strains and making infections more difficult to treat. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different [...] Read more.
Background: Vancomycin is a first-line drug for the treatment of MRSA infection. However, overuse of vancomycin can cause bacteria to become resistant, forming resistant strains and making infections more difficult to treat. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different antibiotics in the treatment of MRSA infections and to compare them, mainly with vancomycin, to find better vancomycin alternatives. Methods: All studies were obtained from the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to 13 April 2023. The three comprehensive indicators of clinical cure success rate, clinical microbiological success rate, and adverse reactions were evaluated, and the clinical cure success rates of three disease types, complex skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs), complex skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs), and pneumonia, were analyzed in subgroups. All statistical analyses were performed using R and STATA 14.0 software for network meta-analysis. Results: A total of 38 trials with 6281 patients were included, and 13 drug treatments were evaluated. For MRSA infections, the results of network meta-analysis showed that the clinical success rates of linezolid, the combination of vancomycin and rifampin, and the combination of minocycline and rifampin were better than that of vancomycin (RR 1.71; 95%-CI 1.45–2.02), (RR 2.46; 95%-CI 1.10–5.49) (RR, 2.77; 95%-CI 1.06–7.21). The success rate of clinical microbiological treatment with vancomycin was inferior to that with telavancin (RR 0.74; 95%-CI 0.55–0.99). Linezolid had a higher rate of adverse reactions than teicoplanin (RR 5.35; 95%-CI 1.10–25.98). Subgroup analysis showed that vancomycin had a lower clinical success rate than linezolid in the treatment of MRSA-induced cSSSIs, cSSTIs, and pneumonia (RR 0.59; 95%-CI 0.44–0.80) (RR 0.55; 95%-CI 0.35–0.89) (RR 0.55; 95%-CI 0.32–0.93). Conclusions: This systematic review and NMA provide a new comparison framework for the clinical treatment of MRSA infection. The NMA suggests that linezolid may be the antibiotic of choice for the treatment of MRSA infections, with the ability to improve clinical and microbiological success rates despite its disadvantage in terms of adverse effects. At the same time, the combination of minocycline and rifampicin may be the most effective drug to treat MRSA-induced cSSSIs, tedizolid may be the best drug to treat MRSA-induced cSSTIs, and the combination of vancomycin and rifampicin may be the most effective treatment for MRSA-induced pneumonia. More high-quality studies are still needed in the future to further identify alternatives to vancomycin. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42023416788. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 554 KiB  
Article
Genomic Insights into Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Exhibiting Diminished Daptomycin Susceptibility
by Natalia Gómez-Casanova, Mª Nieves Gutiérrez-Zufiaurre, Ana Mª Blázquez de Castro and Juan Luis Muñoz-Bellido
Pathogens 2024, 13(3), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13030206 - 26 Feb 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2207
Abstract
Daptomycin is one of the last therapeutic resources for multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. Despite its structural similarities with glycopeptides, its mechanisms of action and resistance are different and in some respects are not completely understood. Mutations in several genes have been associated with daptomycin [...] Read more.
Daptomycin is one of the last therapeutic resources for multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria. Despite its structural similarities with glycopeptides, its mechanisms of action and resistance are different and in some respects are not completely understood. Mutations in several genes have been associated with daptomycin resistance, especially in mprF, walkR, rpoB and rpoC, but their role and importance remain to be elucidated. We have studied mutations in 11 genes, which have been previously associated with daptomycin non-susceptibility, in nine daptomycin-non-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates (daptomycin MIC: >1 mg/L). Susceptibility to daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, oxacillin, telavancin and dalbavancin was studied. walkR, agrA, cls1, cls2, fakA, pnpA, clpP, prs, rpoB, rpoC and mprF were amplified by PCR and sequenced. The sequences were compared with the S. aureus ATCC 25923 complete genome (GenBank gi: 685631213) by using BLAST® software. We did not find any changes in walkR, pnpA, prs and clpP. All isolates excepting isolate MSa5 showed a high number of significant mutations (between 13 and 25 amino acid changes) in mprF. Most isolates also showed mutations in the rpo genes, the cls genes and fakA. Daptomycin non-susceptibility in S. aureus clinical isolates seems to be reached through different mutation combinations when compared to S. aureus ATCC 25293. Especially mprF and cls1 showed very high polymorphism in most isolates. Meanwhile, one isolate, MSa5, showed only single mutation in mprF (P314T). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 545 KiB  
Review
New Antibiotics for the Treatment of Nosocomial Central Nervous System Infections
by Roland Nau, Jana Seele and Helmut Eiffert
Antibiotics 2024, 13(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13010058 - 7 Jan 2024
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 7622
Abstract
Nosocomial central nervous system (CNS) infections with carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Gram-negative and vancomycin-resistant Gram-positive bacteria are an increasing therapeutic challenge. Here, we review pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and clinical experiences with new antibiotics administered intravenously for the treatment of CNS infections by multi-resistant [...] Read more.
Nosocomial central nervous system (CNS) infections with carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Gram-negative and vancomycin-resistant Gram-positive bacteria are an increasing therapeutic challenge. Here, we review pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and clinical experiences with new antibiotics administered intravenously for the treatment of CNS infections by multi-resistant bacteria. Cefiderocol, a new siderophore extended-spectrum cephalosporin, pharmacokinetically behaves similar to established cephalosporins and at high doses will probably be a valuable addition in our therapeutic armamentarium for CNS infections. The new glycopeptides dalbavancin, telavancin, and oritavancin are highly bound to plasma proteins. Although effective in animal models of meningitis, it is unlikely that they reach effective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations after intravenous administration alone. The β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have the principal problem that both compounds must achieve adequate CSF concentrations. In the commercially available combinations, the dose of the β-lactamase inhibitor tends to be too low to achieve adequate CSF concentrations. The oxazolidinone tedizolid has a broader spectrum but a less suitable pharmacokinetic profile than linezolid. The halogenated tetracycline eravacycline does not reach CSF concentrations sufficient to treat colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with usual intravenous dosing. Generally, treatment of CNS infections should be intravenous, whenever possible, to avoid adverse effects of intraventricular therapy (IVT). An additional IVT can overcome the limited penetration of many new antibiotics into CSF. It should be considered for patients in which the CNS infection responds poorly to systemic antimicrobial therapy alone. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3243 KiB  
Article
Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus Resistance to Vancomycin and Daptomycin: Mutation Patterns and Cross-Resistance
by Vladimir Gostev, Olga Kalinogorskaya, Julia Sopova, Ofelia Sulian, Polina Chulkova, Maria Velizhanina, Irina Tsvetkova, Irina Ageevets, Vladimir Ageevets and Sergey Sidorenko
Antibiotics 2023, 12(5), 928; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050928 - 18 May 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3738
Abstract
Vancomycin and daptomycin are first-line drugs for the treatment of complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, including bacteremia. However, their effectiveness is limited not only by their resistance to each antibiotic but also by their associated resistance to both drugs. It is unknown [...] Read more.
Vancomycin and daptomycin are first-line drugs for the treatment of complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, including bacteremia. However, their effectiveness is limited not only by their resistance to each antibiotic but also by their associated resistance to both drugs. It is unknown whether novel lipoglycopeptides can overcome this associated resistance. Resistant derivatives from five S. aureus strains were obtained during adaptive laboratory evolution with vancomycin and daptomycin. Both parental and derivative strains were subjected to susceptibility testing, population analysis profiles, measurements of growth rate and autolytic activity, and whole-genome sequencing. Regardless of whether vancomycin or daptomycin was selected, most of the derivatives were characterized by a reduced susceptibility to daptomycin, vancomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, and oritavancin. Resistance to induced autolysis was observed in all derivatives. Daptomycin resistance was associated with a significant reduction in growth rate. Resistance to vancomycin was mainly associated with mutations in the genes responsible for cell wall biosynthesis, and resistance to daptomycin was associated with mutations in the genes responsible for phospholipid biosynthesis and glycerol metabolism. However, mutations in walK and mprF were detected in derivatives selected for both antibiotics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanism and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1958 KiB  
Review
Staphylococcus Infection: Relapsing Atopic Dermatitis and Microbial Restoration
by John Hulme
Antibiotics 2023, 12(2), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020222 - 20 Jan 2023
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 6464
Abstract
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) skin is susceptible to Staphylococcus aureus (SA) infection, potentially exposing it to a plethora of toxins and virulent determinants, including Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) (α-hemolysin (Hla) and phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs)), and superantigens. Depending on the degree of infection (superficial or invasive), [...] Read more.
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) skin is susceptible to Staphylococcus aureus (SA) infection, potentially exposing it to a plethora of toxins and virulent determinants, including Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) (α-hemolysin (Hla) and phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs)), and superantigens. Depending on the degree of infection (superficial or invasive), clinical treatments may encompass permanganate (aq) and bleach solutions coupled with intravenous/oral antibiotics such as amoxicillin, vancomycin, doxycycline, clindamycin, daptomycin, telavancin, linezolid, or tigecycline. However, when the skin is significantly traumatized (sheathing of epidermal sections), an SA infection can rapidly ensue, impairing the immune system, and inducing local and systemic AD presentations in susceptible areas. Furthermore, when AD presents systemically, desensitization can be long (years) and intertwined with periods of relapse. In such circumstances, the identification of triggers (stress or infection) and severity of the flare need careful monitoring (preferably in real-time) so that tailored treatments targeting the underlying pathological mechanisms (SA toxins, elevated immunoglobulins, impaired healing) can be modified, permitting rapid resolution of symptoms. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 617 KiB  
Article
Resistance to Critical Important Antibacterials in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Strains of Veterinary Origin
by Alessandro Bellato, Patrizia Robino, Maria Cristina Stella, Laura Scarrone, Daniela Scalas and Patrizia Nebbia
Antibiotics 2022, 11(12), 1758; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121758 - 5 Dec 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2097
Abstract
Staphylococcal infections represent a challenge in companion animals and hospitalized patients. This study aimed to assess the resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates, against a broad panel of antibacterials, including exclusive to human medicine. A total of 40 S. pseudintermedius were collected from clinical [...] Read more.
Staphylococcal infections represent a challenge in companion animals and hospitalized patients. This study aimed to assess the resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates, against a broad panel of antibacterials, including exclusive to human medicine. A total of 40 S. pseudintermedius were collected from clinical specimens of dogs (n = 31) and cats (n = 5). All strains were tested for 20 antibacterials, namely 14 Critical Important and eight Highly Important Antibacterials (CIA and HIA, respectively), indicative for 18 antimicrobial classes. All strains were susceptible to seven antibiotics (daptomycin, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, teicoplanin/vancomycin, tigecycline). The highest resistance was against penicillin (97.5% Confidence Interval [CI]: 83.8–100.0), whereas the lowest against telavancin (2.5%, CI: 0.0–16.2). Resistance versus Highest Priority CIA was observed, namely against macrolides (70.0, CI: 52.1–84.3), quinolones (62.5, CI: 44.5–78.3), 5th generation cephalosporins (7.5, CI: 1.3–21.6), and glycopeptides (2.5%, CI: 0.0–14.2). Among High Priority CIA, strains were resistant only to aminoglycosides (65.0, CI: 47.0–80.4) and ansamycins (12.5, CI: 3.8–28.1). We observed the highest resistance against veterinary medicine antibacterials, but there was also resistance against antibacterials exclusive to human medicine, namely ceftaroline (7.5, CI: 1.0–23.8) and telavancin. S. pseudintermedius zoonotic potential and its rate of acquisition of new resistance should encourage surveillance on a broad spectrum of antibacterials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance: A One-Health Approach, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 330 KiB  
Review
New-Generation Antibiotics for Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections: A Review with Focus on Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis
by Annemieke Bloem, Hannelore I. Bax, Erlangga Yusuf and Nelianne J. Verkaik
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(8), 1743; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081743 - 17 Apr 2021
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 8806
Abstract
Infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. They are often difficult to treat and are associated with a poor prognosis. In the past 20 years, nine antibiotic drugs with predominant activity against Gram-positive bacteria have been introduced and [...] Read more.
Infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. They are often difficult to treat and are associated with a poor prognosis. In the past 20 years, nine antibiotic drugs with predominant activity against Gram-positive bacteria have been introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency: ceftaroline, daptomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and omadacycline. This narrative review aims to provide an overview on these antibiotics with a special focus on their use in infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections. Although some of these approved antibiotics are promising, they should not be used as first- or second-line therapy, awaiting more clinical data. Full article
39 pages, 1880 KiB  
Review
Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Era of Multidrug-Resistance: Updates in Diagnosis and Management
by Elena Xu, David Pérez-Torres, Paraskevi C. Fragkou, Jean-Ralph Zahar and Despoina Koulenti
Microorganisms 2021, 9(3), 534; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9030534 - 5 Mar 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 7771
Abstract
Nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-intubated patients and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most frequent hospital-acquired infections, especially in the intensive care unit. NP has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and health care costs, especially when the implicated pathogens [...] Read more.
Nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including hospital-acquired pneumonia in non-intubated patients and ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most frequent hospital-acquired infections, especially in the intensive care unit. NP has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and health care costs, especially when the implicated pathogens are multidrug-resistant ones. This narrative review aims to critically review what is new in the field of NP, specifically, diagnosis and antibiotic treatment. Regarding novel imaging modalities, the current role of lung ultrasound and low radiation computed tomography are discussed, while regarding etiological diagnosis, recent developments in rapid microbiological confirmation, such as syndromic rapid multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction panels are presented and compared with conventional cultures. Additionally, the volatile compounds/electronic nose, a promising diagnostic tool for the future is briefly presented. With respect to NP management, antibiotics approved for the indication of NP during the last decade are discussed, namely, ceftobiprole medocaril, telavancin, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Infectious Issues in Critically Ill Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 281 KiB  
Review
Glycopeptide Hypersensitivity and Adverse Reactions
by Vanthida Huang, Nicola A. Clayton and Kimberly H. Welker
Pharmacy 2020, 8(2), 70; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020070 - 21 Apr 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 7235
Abstract
Glycopeptides, such as vancomycin and teicoplanin, are primarily used in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, such as cellulitis, endocarditis, meningitis, pneumonia, and septicemia, and are some of the most commonly prescribed parenteral antimicrobials. Parenteral glycopeptides are first-line therapy for severe [...] Read more.
Glycopeptides, such as vancomycin and teicoplanin, are primarily used in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, such as cellulitis, endocarditis, meningitis, pneumonia, and septicemia, and are some of the most commonly prescribed parenteral antimicrobials. Parenteral glycopeptides are first-line therapy for severe MRSA infections; however, oral vancomycin is used as a first-line treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections. Also, we currently have the longer-acting lipoglycopeptides, such as dalbavancin, oritavancin, and telavancin to our armamentarium for the treatment of MRSA infections. Lastly, vancomycin is often used as an alternative treatment for patients with β-lactam hypersensitivity. Common adverse effects associated with glycopeptide use include nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and Redman Syndrome (RMS). The RMS is often mistaken for a true allergy; however, it is a histamine-related infusion reaction rather than a true immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic reaction. Although hypersensitivity to glycopeptides is rare, both immune-mediated and delayed reactions have been reported in the literature. We describe the various types of glycopeptide hypersensitivity reactions associated with glycopeptides and lipoglycopeptides, including IgE-mediated reactions, RMS, and linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis, as well as describe cross-reactivity with other glycopeptides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Allergies)
24 pages, 409 KiB  
Review
Novel Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms
by Despoina Koulenti, Elena Xu, Isaac Yin Sum Mok, Andrew Song, Drosos E. Karageorgopoulos, Apostolos Armaganidis, Jeffrey Lipman and Sotirios Tsiodras
Microorganisms 2019, 7(8), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080270 - 18 Aug 2019
Cited by 78 | Viewed by 10061
Abstract
Increasing multidrug-resistance to Gram-positive pathogens, particularly to staphylococci, enterococci and streptococci, is a major problem, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In recent years, only a small number of novel antibiotics effective against Gram-positive bacteria has been approved. This review will [...] Read more.
Increasing multidrug-resistance to Gram-positive pathogens, particularly to staphylococci, enterococci and streptococci, is a major problem, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In recent years, only a small number of novel antibiotics effective against Gram-positive bacteria has been approved. This review will discuss the current evidence for novel branded antibiotics that are highly effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections by Gram-positive pathogens, namely ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, telavancin, oritavancin, dalbavancin, tedizolid, besifloxacin, delafloxacin, ozenoxacin, and omadacycline. The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, microbiological spectrum, efficacy and safety profile will be concisely presented. As for any emerging antibiotic agent, resistance is likely to develop against these highly effective antibiotics. Only through appropriate dosing, utilization and careful resistance development monitoring will these novel antibiotics continue to treat Gram-positive pathogens in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens)
Back to TopTop