Search Results (3,269)

Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or cause less toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with locally advanced EAC or AEGJ treated at our tertiary cancer center between January 2015 and March 2023. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (n = 36) or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy following the CROSS protocol (n = 40), followed by surgical resection and standardized follow-up. We compared survival outcomes, toxicity profiles, treatment compliance, and surgical results between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between FLOT and CROSS treatments in five-year loco-regional controls (LRC: 61.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.81), progression-free survival (PFS: 33.9% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.82), overall survival (OS: 60.2% vs. 63.4%; p = 0.91), or distant controls (DC: 42.1% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.39). High-grade hematologic toxicities did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Treatment compliance was lower in the FLOT group, with 50% (18/36) not completing all the planned chemotherapy cycles, compared to 17.5% (7/40) in the CROSS group. All the patients in the CROSS group received the full radiotherapy dose. Surgical outcomes and post-surgical tumor status were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Although perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has recently become a standard of care for locally advanced EAC and AEGJ, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy per the CROSS protocol remains a well-tolerated alternative. In appropriately selected patients, both approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes. Full article

Background and Objective: Adverse pathology to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (upgrading) poses a threat to risk stratification and treatment planning. The impact on sexual function, urinary continence, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. Methods: From 2004 to 2024, 4189 patients with preop low-/intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 6 or 7a, PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL) underwent radical prostatectomy at our department and were analyzed. Primary endpoint was HRQOL, erectile function, and urinary continence. Secondary endpoint was rate of salvage therapies and biochemical-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed using “operative time”, “robot-assisted surgery”, “blood loss”, “nerve-sparing surgery”, “age”, and “BMI” to represent comparable surgical approach. Median follow-up was 39 months (Interquartile-range (IQR) 15–60). Key Findings and Limitations: Patients who were upgraded to high-risk PCa showed a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy compared to patients who were not upgraded (21% vs. 7%, p < 0.001; 9% vs. 3%, p = 0.002). Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 68% in the upgrading group vs. 84% in the no-upgrading group (p < 0.001). We saw no difference in patient-reported HRQOL, urinary continence, or erectile function. Multivariable analysis showed that postoperative upgrading was a significant risk for not achieving good overall HRQOL (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.97, p = 0.028) during the follow-up. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Although postoperative upgrading to high-risk PCa leads to worse oncologic outcomes and higher salvage therapy rates, this study indicates that its impact on health-related quality of life is minimal and should not deter a cautious approach to radical prostatectomy. Full article

Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a common and challenging manifestation of several gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Bidirectional treatment—combining Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with systemic chemotherapy—has emerged as a strategy to enhance locoregional control while maintaining systemic coverage. Objective: This systematic review aimed to analyze the study design, characteristics, and timing of the treatments administered—including the type of systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal agents used in PIPAC, and interval between administrations—as well as the clinical outcomes, safety profile, and overall methodological quality of the available literature on bidirectional treatment for peritoneal metastases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 2025. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bidirectional treatment. Data extraction focused on survival, response assessment (PRGS, PCI), adverse events, systemic and intraperitoneal regimens, treatment interval, and study methodology. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 1015 patients (742 treated with bidirectional therapy) were included. Median overall survival ranged from 2.8 to 19.6 months, with the most favorable outcomes observed in gastric and colorectal cancer cohorts. PRGS improvement after multiple PIPAC cycles was reported in >80% of evaluable cases. High-grade adverse events (CTCAE ≥ 3) occurred in up to 17% of patients in most studies, with only one study reporting treatment-related mortality. However, methodological quality was generally moderate, with considerable heterogeneity in treatment protocols, response criteria, systemic regimens, and toxicity attribution. Conclusions: Bidirectional therapy with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy appears to be a feasible and potentially effective strategy for selected patients with peritoneal metastases. Despite encouraging outcomes, definitive conclusions are limited by the retrospective nature and heterogeneity of available studies. Prospective standardized trials are needed to confirm efficacy, clarify patient selection, and optimize treatment protocols. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pulmonary typical carcinoid (TC) is a rare type of primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the lung with indolent behavior and a good prognosis. The main treatment strategy is surgery, the extent of which is controversial given the nature of the disease. The aim of this study is to assess whether the extent of resection influences survival and recurrence in patients undergoing lung resection and lymphadenectomy for TC and to investigate negative prognostic factors for OS. Methods: A single-centre retrospective study of 15 years’ experience was conducted. Data from all patients who underwent lung resection and lymphadenectomy for TC were collected. Patients were divided into two groups: anatomical and non-anatomical resections. Perioperative and long-term oncological results were analyzed. Results: In total, 115 patients were surgically treated for TC, of whom 83 (72%) underwent anatomical resection and 32 (28%) non-anatomical resection. Univariate analyses showed that age, left lower lobe, and many comorbidities had a detrimental effect on OS, whereas on multivariate analysis, only left lower lobe location and a high Charlson–Deyo comorbidity index (CCI) were confirmed as negative prognostic factors for OS. At a median follow-up of 93 months (IQR 57-129), the OS survival curves show a slightly lower trend for non-anatomical resections (p 0.152), while no differences were found for DFS. Conclusions: The results of this study confirm that in selected patients at risk for major resections, non-anatomical resection can be used to treat TC when R0 is achievable. These data, together with evidence from the literature, highlight the importance of patient-centred care in this rare disease. Full article

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, with approximately 2100 cases diagnosed annually in the United States. The 5-year overall survival rate varies significantly depending on the node involvement status, at 79% in node-negative disease versus 51% for patients with inguinal metastasis. Inguinal lymph nodes are involved in micrometastatic disease in up to one out of four patients. Early inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) has been shown to provide a survival advantage, which is why many patients undergo inguinal lymph node dissection for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Unfortunately, ILND is associated with high morbidity rates, which have led to potential overtreatment and decreased quality of life in the penile cancer population. Several advancements have been made to mitigate these challenges, such as dynamic sentinel node dissection, modifications to the technique or surgical templates, the introduction of minimally invasive procedures, and changes to the postoperative pathway. This manuscript examines the evolution in managing the inguinal lymph nodes in penile cancer, its associated complications, and effective strategies for their prevention and management. Full article

Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a type of cancer that is difficult to diagnose and treat. Patients may have vastly varying prognoses, and prognostic factors may help guide the clinical approach. As a recently identified biomarker, the pan-Immune-Inflammation-Value (PIV) is a simple, comprehensive, and peripheral blood cell-based biomarker. Methods: The present study represents a retrospective observational analysis carried out within a single-center setting. Ninety-five patients with PM stages I–IV were enrolled in the study. We analyzed the correlation between patients’ demographic characteristics, clinicopathological factors such as histological subtypes, surgery status, tumor thickness, blood-based parameters, and treatment options with their prognoses. PIV was calculated by the following formula: (neutrophil count × monocyte count × platelet count)/lymphocyte count. Additionally, blood-based parameters were used to calculate the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII). Results: We categorized the patients into two groups, low PIV group (PIV ≤ 732.3) and high PIV group (PIV > 732.3) according to the determined cut-off value, which was defined as the median. It was revealed that high PIV was associated with poor survival outcomes. The median follow-up period was 15.8 months (interquartile range, IQR, 7.1 to 29.8 months). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients in the low PIV group (median 29.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.6 to 44) than the high PIV group (median 14.7 months, 95% CI, 10.8 to 18.6 p < 0.001). Furthermore, the study revealed that patients with low PIV, NLR, and SII values were more likely to be eligible for surgery and were diagnosed at earlier stages. Additionally, these markers were identified as potential predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in the surgical cohort and of treatment response across the entire patient population. Conclusions: In addition to well-established clinical factors such as stage, histologic subtype, resectability, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), PIV emerged as an independent and significant prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) in patients with PM. Moreover, PIV also demonstrated a remarkable independent prognostic value for disease-free survival (DFS) in this patient population. Additionally, some clues are provided for conditions such as treatment responses, staging, and suitability for surgery. As such, in this cohort, it has outperformed the other blood-based markers based on our findings. Given its ease of calculation and cost-effectiveness, PIV represents a promising and practical prognostic tool in the clinical management of pleural mesothelioma. It can be easily calculated using routinely available laboratory parameters for every cancer patient, requiring no additional cost or complex procedures, thus facilitating its integration into everyday clinical practice. Full article

Background: Breast cancer is the most common neoplasm in women. Despite effective treatments, sequelae such as decreased muscle strength, upper limb dysfunction, and tissue changes are common, highlighting the need for functional assessments during rehabilitation. This study analysed the morphofunctional profile of the upper limbs in breast cancer survivors, comparing muscle strength and ultrasound findings between groups with and without lymphoedema, as well as between ipsilateral and contralateral limbs. Methods: This cross-sectional study included female breast cancer survivors treated at an oncology physical therapy clinic. Muscle strength was measured using dynamometry (handgrip and arm flexor strength), and ultrasound assessed the thickness of the dermal–epidermal complex (DEC), subcutaneous tissue (SUB), and muscle (MT). Results: The upper limbs of 41 women were evaluated. No significant differences were observed between those with and without breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL). When comparing the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs, significant reductions were observed in arm flexor strength (p < 0.001; 95% CI: −9.77 to −2.50), handgrip strength (p < 0.001; 95% CI: −4.10 to −1.22), and tissue thickness, with increased DEC thickness on the forearm (0.20 mm; p = 0.022) and arm flexors (0.25 mm; p < 0.001) of the ipsilateral limb. Conclusion: Significant differences in muscle strength and tissue structure between ipsilateral and contralateral limbs may reflect surgical and local pathophysiological effects. A trend toward reduced values for these parameters was also noted in limbs with BCRL, reinforcing the importance of future research to elucidate underlying mechanisms and guide more effective therapeutic strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Preoperative strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring major hepatectomy remain controversial, particularly in “borderline resectable” cases. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological benefit and perioperative safety of Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients undergoing right or extended right hepatectomy for HCC. Material and Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent right or extended right hepatectomy for HCC at a single tertiary center between January 2013 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped based on whether they received preoperative TARE or underwent upfront resection. Outcomes analyzed included perioperative morbidity and long-term oncological endpoints. Results: A total of 39 patients were included, of whom 18 received preoperative TARE and 21 underwent upfront surgery. Patients in the TARE group showed significantly greater tumor necrosis at pathology (70% vs. 10%, p = 0.002) and more frequent extended resections. Five-year cancer-specific survival (80.4% vs. 33.5%, p = 0.011), recurrence-free survival (33.8% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.047), and curative-intent disease-free survival (69.3% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.0037) were significantly higher in the TARE group. Overall survival showed a favorable trend. Intraoperative outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and 90-day mortality were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Preoperative TARE is a safe and effective neoadjuvant strategy in selected patients with HCC undergoing major hepatectomy. It may enhance long-term oncological outcomes without increasing surgical risk, supporting its potential role in the management of borderline resectable HCC. Full article

Background and Objectives: There is a global rise of public interest in integrative medicine. The principles of integrative medicine combining conventional medicine with evidence-based complementary therapies have been implemented in many medical areas, including plastic surgery, to improve patient’s outcome. The aim of the present study was to systematically analyze the application and use of additional non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) of patients of a German department of plastic surgery. Materials and Methods: The present real-world data study utilized data from the Network Oncology registry between 2016 and 2021. Patients included in this study were at the age of 18 or above, stayed at the department of plastic surgery and received at least one plastic surgical procedure. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to detect associations between the acceptance of NPIs and predicting factors such as age, gender, year of admission, or length of hospital stay. Results: In total, 265 patients were enrolled in the study between January 2016 and December 2021 with a median age of 65 years (IQR: 52–80) and a male/female ratio of 0.77. Most of the patients received reconstructive surgery (90.19%), followed by hand surgery (5.68%) and aesthetic surgery (2.64%). In total, 42.5% of the enrolled patients accepted and applied NPIs. Physiotherapy, rhythmical embrocations, and compresses were the most often administered NPIs. Conclusions: This exploratory analysis provides a descriptive overview of the application and acceptance of NPIs in plastic surgery patients within a German integrative care setting. While NPIs appear to be well accepted by a subset of patients, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate their impact on clinical outcomes such as postoperative recovery, pain management, patient-reported quality of life, and overall satisfaction with care. Full article

Histotripsy is a novel, noninvasive, non-thermal technology invented in 2004 for the precise destruction of biologic tissue. It offers a powerful alternative to more conventional thermal or surgical interventions. Using short-pulse, low-duty cycle ultrasonic waves, histotripsy creates cavitation bubble clouds that selectively and precisely destroy targeted tissue in a predefined volume while sparing critical structures like bile ducts, ureters, and blood vessels. Such precision is of value when treating tumors near vital structures. The FDA has cleared histotripsy for the treatment of all liver tumors. Major medical centers are currently spearheading clinical trials, and some institutions have already integrated the technology into patient care. Histotripsy is now being studied for a host of other cancers, including primary kidney and pancreatic tumors. Preclinical murine and porcine models have already revealed promising outcomes. One of histotripsy’s primary advantages is its non-thermal mechanical actuation. This feature allows it to circumvent the limitations of heat-based techniques, including the heat sink effect and unpredictable treatment margins near sensitive tissues. In addition to its non-invasive ablative capacities, it is being preliminarily explored for its potential to induce immunomodulation and promote abscopal inhibition of distant, untreated tumors through CD8+ T cell responses. Thus, it may provide a multilayered therapeutic effect in the treatment of cancer. Histotripsy has the potential to improve precision and outcomes across a multitude of specialties, from oncology to cardiovascular medicine. Continued trials are crucial to further expand its applications and validate its long-term efficacy. Due to the speed of recent developments, the goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of histotripsy. It will explore its physics-based mechanisms, differentiating it from similar technologies, discuss its clinical applications, and examine its advantages, limitations, and future. Full article

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are diverse and particularly challenging in terms of current immunotherapy but hold great opportunity for impact given that they constitute the highest cancer incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Traditional treatment options for solid GI malignancies include surgical intervention, chemotherapy, radiation, or a combination of these treatments. Emerging modalities within immunotherapy are anticipated to extend the results with conventional therapy by stimulating the patient’s own intrinsic potential for tumor-specific immunologic rejection. Combination regimens of chemotherapy and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy in advanced colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer, autologous monocyte therapy in advanced gastric cancer, and CAR-T therapy trained against GI-selective tumor antigens such as carcinoembryonic antigen are currently being studied. Clinical trials are underway to study the combination of various chemotherapeutic agents along with immunotherapy in the management of cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and esophageal cancer. Alternative therapies are needed based on the tumor immune microenvironment, which can lead to a personalized approach to treatment. In this review, we discuss the current status of various modalities of immunotherapy in common GI malignancies, along with their mechanisms of immune activation and cancer suppression. We will also discuss the use of immunotherapy in less common solid GI malignancies and touch on recent advancements and clinical trials. Full article

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains a major clinical challenge due to its high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Although total mesorectal excision (TME) has been established as the gold standard surgical approach, high recurrence rates associated with surgery alone have driven the development of multimodal preoperative strategies, such as radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. More recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)—which integrates systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery—and non-operative management (NOM) for patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) have further expanded treatment options. These advances aim not only to improve oncologic outcomes but also to enhance quality of life (QOL) by reducing long-term morbidity and preserving organ function. However, several unresolved issues persist, including the optimal sequencing of therapies, precise risk stratification, accurate evaluation of treatment response, and effective surveillance protocols for NOM. The advent of molecular biomarkers, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence (AI) presents new opportunities for individualized treatment and more accurate prognostication. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of preoperative treatment for LARC, critically examines emerging strategies and their supporting evidence, and discusses future directions to optimize both oncological and patient-centered outcomes. By integrating clinical, molecular, and technological advances, the management of rectal cancer is moving toward truly personalized medicine. Full article

Background: The identification and clinical implementation of robust biomarkers are essential for improving diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment across a wide range of diseases. Pancreatic stone protein (PSP) has recently emerged as a promising candidate biomarker. Objective: This narrative review aims to provide an updated and comprehensive overview of the clinical applications of PSP in infectious, oncological, metabolic, and surgical contexts. Methods: We conducted a structured literature search using PubMed^®, applying the SANRA framework for narrative reviews. Boolean operators were used to retrieve relevant studies on PSP in a wide range of clinical conditions, including sepsis, gastrointestinal cancers, diabetes, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Results: PSP has shown strong diagnostic and prognostic potential in sepsis, where it may outperform traditional markers such as CRP and PCT. It has also demonstrated relevance in gastrointestinal cancers, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and perioperative infections. PSP levels appear to rise earlier than other inflammatory markers and may be less affected by sterile inflammation. Conclusion: PSP represents a versatile and clinically valuable biomarker. Its integration into diagnostic protocols could enhance early detection and risk stratification in critical care and oncology settings. However, widespread adoption is currently limited by the availability of point-of-care assay platforms. Full article

Background: Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) represents a major clinical challenge in oncology, affecting 25–50% of colorectal cancer patients and significantly impacting survival. While multimodal therapies—including surgical resection, systemic chemotherapy, and local ablative techniques—have improved outcomes, prognosis remains heterogeneous due to variations in tumor biology, patient factors, and institutional practices. Methods: This review synthesizes current evidence on prognostic factors influencing CRLM management, encompassing clinical (e.g., tumor burden, anatomic distribution, timing of metastases), biological (e.g., CEA levels, inflammatory markers), and molecular (e.g., RAS/BRAF mutations, MSI status, HER2 alterations) determinants. Results: Key findings highlight the critical role of molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic decisions, with RAS/BRAF mutations predicting resistance to anti-EGFR therapies and MSI-H status indicating potential responsiveness to immunotherapy. Emerging tools like circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and radiomics offer promise for dynamic risk stratification and early recurrence detection, while the gut microbiome is increasingly recognized as a modulator of treatment response. Conclusions: Despite advancements, challenges persist in standardizing resectability criteria and integrating multidisciplinary approaches. Current guidelines (NCCN, ESMO, ASCO) emphasize personalized strategies but lack granularity in terms of incorporating novel biomarkers. This exhaustive review underscores the imperative for the development of a unified, biomarker-integrated framework to refine CRLM management and improve long-term outcomes. Full article

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy among women, posing significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges during pregnancy. Case presentation: This case report presents the treatment of a 32-year-old pregnant woman diagnosed with cervical cancer. Following the diagnosis at 7 weeks of gestation, histological and imaging examinations were performed, leading to the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Due to the tumor progression noticed under therapy, cesarean section was performed at 29 weeks, immediately followed by radical hysterectomy. Conclusions: The management of cervical cancer during pregnancy necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, based on the patient’s condition, tumor stage, and fetal maturity. This case highlights the limitations and complexities of treating cervical cancer during pregnancy and emphasizes the importance of individualized oncological and surgical planning. Full article