Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (92)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = single crown implant

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 712 KiB  
Article
Bone Stability After Immediate Implants and Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A 15-Year Retrospective Clinical Study
by Nicola De Angelis, Paolo Pesce, Catherine Yumang, Domenico Baldi and Maria Menini
Dent. J. 2025, 13(7), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13070299 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 518
Abstract
Background: In modern dentistry, alveolar socket preservation after tooth extraction plays a critical role in maintaining the alveolar ridge for future dental implants. This retrospective clinical study evaluated bone-level changes 15 years after immediate implant placement, coupled with alveolar ridge preservation. Methods: Fifty [...] Read more.
Background: In modern dentistry, alveolar socket preservation after tooth extraction plays a critical role in maintaining the alveolar ridge for future dental implants. This retrospective clinical study evaluated bone-level changes 15 years after immediate implant placement, coupled with alveolar ridge preservation. Methods: Fifty non-smoking patients aged 25 to 75 (30 males and 20 females) who underwent single-implant rehabilitation in both anterior and posterior regions of the upper and lower jaws were included. The study examined bone levels and implant survival over time, using standardized intraoral radiographs at 1, 5, and 15 years post-loading. Implants were placed immediately after atraumatic extraction, and the residual gap was grafted with bovine hydroxyapatite and covered with a collagen membrane. The primary outcome was bone-level stability, while secondary outcomes included implant failure. No temporary crowns or removable dentures were provided during healing. Radiographs were digitized for detailed analysis. Results: The results for 50 patients with immediate implant placement showed that bone-resorption levels were significantly higher in the upper jaw than in the lower jaw. Conclusions: Posterior implants exhibited greater bone loss than anterior implants, particularly at 1 year and 15 years, while no implant failures occurred. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Oral Health Management and Disease Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2395 KiB  
Article
Immediately Placed Single Locking-Taper Implants in the Aesthetic Area of Upper Maxilla: A Short-Term Pilot Study
by Giorgio Lombardo, Annarita Signoriello, Alessandro Zangani, Alessia Pardo, Mauro Marincola, Elena Messina, Miriana Gualtieri, Giovanni Corrocher, Massimo Albanese and Paolo Faccioni
Prosthesis 2025, 7(3), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7030060 - 27 May 2025
Viewed by 551
Abstract
Background: As the rehabilitation of the upper anterior maxilla primarily requires high predictability of successful aesthetic outcomes, procedures of immediate implant placement are frequently employed. The aim of this pilot study was to retrospectively evaluate the short-term outcomes of a protocol of immediate [...] Read more.
Background: As the rehabilitation of the upper anterior maxilla primarily requires high predictability of successful aesthetic outcomes, procedures of immediate implant placement are frequently employed. The aim of this pilot study was to retrospectively evaluate the short-term outcomes of a protocol of immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets, followed by immediate non-functional provisional restorations. Methods: Patients were treated for the replacement of maxillary central or lateral incisors, or cuspid teeth with a single-crown locking-taper implant. Clinical and photographic records were retrospectively compared between the teeth prior to extraction (T0) and restorations one year after prosthetic loading (T1). Outcomes were analyzed using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), according to the patient’s phenotype (thin/thick), with or without the use of connective tissue graft (CTG). Results: The overall mean PES of 25 implants treated was 9.24 ± 2.36 at T0 and 9.60 ± 1.70 at T1. Comparison of groups between T0 and T1 revealed significant PES variations (p = 0.04), with the best and the worst scores, respectively, registered for thin + CTG group (from 7.50 ± 1.91 to 9.75 ± 2.87) and thin group (from 11.33 ± 2.33 to 10 ± 0.89); moderate increases were assessed for thick group (from 8.44 ± 2.40 to 9.44 ± 2.12) and thick + CTG group (from 9.50 ± 1.04 to 9.33 ± 0.81). Conclusions: Within the limits of a short-term analysis of a small number of patients, immediate implant rehabilitation for aesthetic areas of the upper maxilla can be assumed as a safe and predictable protocol. Concomitant use of CTG seems to provide beneficial effects in thin phenotypes, not any additional value in thick phenotypes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Prosthodontics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2404 KiB  
Systematic Review
Are Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns a Viable Alternative to Metal-Ceramics? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Liandra Constantina da Mota Fonseca, Daniele Sorgatto Faé, Beatriz Neves Fernandes, Izabela da Costa, Jean Soares Miranda and Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
Ceramics 2025, 8(2), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020063 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 771
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate prosthetic complications, implant survival rates, and marginal bone loss in implant-supported monolithic restorations compared to metal-ceramic restorations. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251022336) and conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. [...] Read more.
This study aimed to evaluate prosthetic complications, implant survival rates, and marginal bone loss in implant-supported monolithic restorations compared to metal-ceramic restorations. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251022336) and conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and ProQuest for articles published up to December 2024. The inclusion criteria comprised studies evaluating only randomized clinical trials that evaluated implant-supported monolithic restorations directly compared to metal-ceramic restorations, considering any type of ceramic material and regardless of the fixation system (screw-retained or cemented), with a minimum follow-up of one year. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software, and the risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the RoB 2.0 and GRADE tools, respectively. A total of six studies were included, all of which exclusively evaluated monolithic zirconia single crowns over follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 3 years. None of the included studies evaluated fixed partial dentures or restorative materials other than monolithic zirconia. In total, 267 patients (mean age range: 18–57 years) were analyzed, with a total of 174 implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and 165 metal-ceramic single crowns in the posterior region (premolars and molars). The meta-analysis revealed that implant-supported monolithic zirconia single crowns exhibited significantly fewer prosthetic complications compared to metal-ceramic single crowns (p < 0.0001; Risk Ratio [RR]: 0.26; Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.14–0.47). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between implant-supported monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic single crowns regarding implant survival rates (p = 0.36; RR: 1.66; CI: 0.56–4.94) or marginal bone loss (p = 0.15; Mean Difference [MD]: −0.05; CI: −0.11–0.02). The risk of bias assessment indicated that four studies had a low risk of bias. However, the certainty of evidence was classified as low for prosthetic complications and implant survival rates and very low for marginal bone loss. Within the limitations of this review, it can be concluded that implant-supported monolithic zirconia single crowns can be considered a favorable treatment option as they show comparable implant survival and bone stability to metal-ceramic crowns, with a potential reduction in short-term prosthetic complications such as screw loosening and ceramic chipping. However, due to the limited number of studies included and low certainty of evidence, further long-term research is still needed to confirm their clinical performance over time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 223 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Complications and Marginal Bone Loss Observed in Prosthetic Restorations Applied to Different Implant Abutment Connection Types: A Retrospective Study
by Elif Altinbas, Serhat Süha Türkaslan and Zeynep Başağaoğlu Demirekin
Prosthesis 2025, 7(3), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7030046 - 7 May 2025
Viewed by 652
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical results of two different implant–abutment connection types (screw-retained/Morse locking taper), marginal bone loss, and complications in prosthetic restorations. Materials and Methods: In 2017–2018, 579 implants and 242 implant-supported restorations [...] Read more.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical results of two different implant–abutment connection types (screw-retained/Morse locking taper), marginal bone loss, and complications in prosthetic restorations. Materials and Methods: In 2017–2018, 579 implants and 242 implant-supported restorations applied to 137 patients were included in the study. Patients were recalled every six months, clinical evaluations were accomplished, and complications were recorded. When examining the distribution of prosthetic restorations by type, it was determined that 38 (15.70%) were single crowns, 136 (56.19%) were fixed partial cement-retained bridge restorations, 53 (21.90%) were fixed partial screw-retained bridge restorations, and 15 (6.19%) were overdenture prostheses. Findings: Overall, complications included eighteen (21.68%) retention losses, nineteen (22.89%) instances of screw loosening, twenty-one (25.30%) veneer ceramic fractures, three (3.61%) acrylic base fractures, fourteen (16.87%) cases of peri-implantitis, and eight (9.64%) implant losses. Conclusions: Differences in complication rates were observed between implants with different implant–abutment connection designs. While no significant differences were found regarding annual mesial and distal marginal bone loss for implants with conical locking connections, a significant difference was detected in those with screw-retained connections. In both implant groups, mesial and distal marginal bone loss progressed gradually over the follow-up period. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Oral Implantology: Current Aspects and Future Perspectives)
12 pages, 2944 KiB  
Article
Comparison of the Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Implant-Supported Restorations on Titanium Base Using Various Materials: An In Vitro Study
by Oriol Cantó-Navés, Jordi Martí-Vigil, Javier de Medrano, Jiaxing Wu and Oscar Figueras-Alvarez
Materials 2025, 18(7), 1590; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071590 - 1 Apr 2025
Viewed by 556
Abstract
The adaptation of restorations to the titanium base (TiBase) abutments varies depending on the materials and methods used, playing a crucial role in implant and prosthetic success. This in vitro study aims to compare the internal and marginal fit of a titanium interface [...] Read more.
The adaptation of restorations to the titanium base (TiBase) abutments varies depending on the materials and methods used, playing a crucial role in implant and prosthetic success. This in vitro study aims to compare the internal and marginal fit of a titanium interface among three different milled materials: doped graphene PMMA, single-density zirconia, and dual-density zirconia, used for the rehabilitation of CAD-CAM implant-supported single crowns. A digital method based on the silicone replica technique was employed. The silicone reproduction of each fabricated restoration’s inner and basal parts was digitally aligned to the titanium base, measuring the space between them at three predetermined planes: basal, middle, and superior. The material with the worst overall adaptation was dual-density zirconia (0.1 ± 0.03 mm), followed by single-density zirconia (0.09 ± 0.03 mm), and doped graphene PMMA (0.06 ± 0.02 mm). No statistical differences were found in the internal fit, represented by the measurements made at the middle and superior plane, among the materials used (p > 0.05). However, the marginal fit of doped graphene PMMA restorations was statistically better than zirconia restorations (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the marginal fit of both types of zirconia (p > 0.05). Across all three materials, the superior plane showed the best fit, while the marginal plane exhibited the worst. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 226 KiB  
Article
Enhanced Patient Satisfaction with Digital Impressions Using 3Shape TRIOS 3 Move Scanner for Single-Implant Crowns
by Tran Hung Lam, Pham Minh Cuong, Nguyen Hoang Nam, Vo Huyen Bao Tran and Hoang Viet
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 2881; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062881 - 7 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1053
Abstract
Background: This study aims to compare treatment time and patient satisfaction between digital and conventional impression techniques in single-tooth implant prosthetics. Materials and Methods: A controlled study was conducted on 22 patients with single-tooth loss in the posterior arch who underwent implant replacement. [...] Read more.
Background: This study aims to compare treatment time and patient satisfaction between digital and conventional impression techniques in single-tooth implant prosthetics. Materials and Methods: A controlled study was conducted on 22 patients with single-tooth loss in the posterior arch who underwent implant replacement. Impressions were taken using both conventional techniques (polyvinyl siloxane) and digital methods (3Shape Trios 3 Move scanner). Results: The digital impression technique significantly reduced treatment time compared to the conventional method. The total procedure time and individual steps in the digital process were notably shorter than those in the conventional process (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent digital impressions reported not only significantly higher satisfaction and comfort levels but also less pain, unpleasant taste, and level of nausea (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Digital impressions can be superior in reducing treatment time and improving patient satisfaction compared to conventional methods, highlighting their advantages in single-tooth implant prosthetics. However, further research, involving different digital systems and clinical evaluations, is required to fully validate these advantages. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Operative Dentistry)
15 pages, 5866 KiB  
Article
Torque Loss, Survival, and Strain Distribution of Implant-Supported Prostheses with Zirconia and Cobalt–Chromium Hybrid Abutments
by Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Lívia Fiorin, Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria, Estevam Augusto Bonfante and Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
Medicina 2025, 61(2), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020274 - 5 Feb 2025
Viewed by 2930
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The manufacturing of single crowns using hybrid abutments is an alternative that may be interesting in clinical practice, combining the advantages of the different materials used in a personalized design for each case. The purpose of this in vitro [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The manufacturing of single crowns using hybrid abutments is an alternative that may be interesting in clinical practice, combining the advantages of the different materials used in a personalized design for each case. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the torque loss, survival, reliability, failure mode, and strain distribution of implant-supported prostheses with zirconia (Zir) and cobalt–chromium (Co-Cr) hybrid abutments. Materials and Methods: Abutments were milled by CAD/CAM and divided into two groups according to the materials used, Zir and Co-Cr, and cemented on titanium bases screwed to dental implants. Monolithic zirconia crowns were cemented on the abutments. The implant/abutment/crown sets were subjected to thermomechanical cycling (n = 10) (2 Hz, 140 N, 1 × 106 cycles, immersed in water at 5–55 °C) to evaluate the torque loss. The single load to fracture test (SLF) was performed to design the loading profiles (light, moderate, and aggressive) of the step-stress accelerated life testing (SSALT) (n = 21) to evaluate the survival and reliability. The representative fractured specimens were analyzed under optical and scanning electron microscopy. The digital image correlation (DIC) (n = 1) was performed using specimens embedded in polyurethane resin models that received static point loading, and the strain distribution was analyzed. Results: There was no difference in torque loss, survival, or reliability between zirconia and Co-Cr abutments. An analysis of the fractured surfaces showed that the abutments presented the same failure mode, where the fracture probably started in the titanium base/screw. The zirconia abutment model presented only compressive strains around the implant, while the Co-Cr abutment model showed tensile and compressive strains in the middle of the implant; however, all strains were within the clinically acceptable limits. There was a strain concentration in the titanium base close to the implant platform for both groups. Conclusions: Zirconia and Co-Cr hybrid abutments presented similar torque loss, survival, reliability, and failure modes, but the abutment material influenced the strain distribution around the implant. The titanium base screw was the weakest link in the system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry and Oral Health)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1899 KiB  
Article
Factors Influencing the Screw Stability of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Study
by Shaza Bishti, Mohamad Shams Eddin Alsagher, Martin Homa, Stefan Wolfart and Taşkın Tuna
Materials 2025, 18(3), 506; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030506 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1089
Abstract
The aim is to investigate the impact of retention type, implant/abutment angulation, and the presence of sealant/antimicrobial agents on screw loosening of implant-supported restorations. Fifty dental implants along with their respective abutments and screws were allocated to five groups (n = 10). The [...] Read more.
The aim is to investigate the impact of retention type, implant/abutment angulation, and the presence of sealant/antimicrobial agents on screw loosening of implant-supported restorations. Fifty dental implants along with their respective abutments and screws were allocated to five groups (n = 10). The groups were categorized based on type of crown retention (screw-/cement-retained), implant/abutment angulation (0°/20°), and type of disinfectant/sealant as follows: Cem_control (cemented/0°/none), Cem_GP (cemented/0°/gutta-percha), Cem_CHX (cemented/0°/chlorhexidine), Cem_Ang (cemented/20°/none), and Screw (screwed/0°/ none). Abutment screws were tightened (20 Ncm), and CAD/CAM zirconia crowns were fabricated. Glass ionomer cement was used for crown cementation in the cemented groups. Samples were subjected to dynamic loading in a chewing simulator (1,200,000 cycles/98 N). After loading, the reverse torque values (RTVs) of the abutment screws were determined (Ncm) using an electronic screwdriver, and the reverse torque difference (RTD) was subsequently calculated. The lowest RTD was reported in group Cem_GP (−2.22 ± 1.03), whereas the highest RTD was seen in group Screw (−4.65 ± 1.79). Group Screw showed a statistically significant difference from all other groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference between the cemented test groups Cem_GP, Cem_CHX, and Cem_Ang and the control group was found. Screw-retained restorations exhibited significantly greater RTD values compared to cement-retained ones. Implant/abutment angulation and the sealant/disinfectant appeared to have no notable effect on the screw stability of single-implant restorations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1625 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted–Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up
by Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Jesús Pato-Mourelo, Borja López-López, Loreto Monsalve-Guil, Jesús Moreno-Muñoz, José López-López, Enrique Núñez-Márquez, Nuno Matos Garrido, José Luis Rondón-Romero, Álvaro Jiménez-Guerra and Iván Ortiz-García
Materials 2025, 18(1), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010183 - 4 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1292
Abstract
Sandblasting and acid etching are common procedures used to treat implant surfaces, enhancing osseointegration and improving clinical success rates. This clinical study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of sandblasted and acid-etched implants. A total of 303 implants were placed in 114 partially [...] Read more.
Sandblasting and acid etching are common procedures used to treat implant surfaces, enhancing osseointegration and improving clinical success rates. This clinical study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of sandblasted and acid-etched implants. A total of 303 implants were placed in 114 partially and totally edentulous patients using a two-stage surgical technique and an early loading protocol (6–8 weeks). Clinical findings for implants and prosthetics were evaluated over a 12-year follow-up period. A total of 12 implants (3.9%) failed, with 3 failures occurring during the healing period before loading and 9 due to peri-implantitis. The cumulative survival rate for all implants was 96.1%. A total of 156 prostheses were placed on 300 implants, 87 single crowns, 45 partial fixed bridges, 9 full-arch fixed restorations, and 15 overdentures. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.18 mm. (SD. 0.64 mm.). Thirty-nine implants (13%) in twenty-four patients exhibited peri-implantitis. Technical complications, including prosthetic screw loosening or fracture, ceramic chipping, and acrylic fractures, were observed in 24 subjects (21.1%). Sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants placed in the maxilla and mandible reported favorable outcomes and stable tissue conditions with an early loading protocol. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1103 KiB  
Systematic Review
Dental Implant Failure Risk in Patients with Bruxism—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
by Josephine A. Ionfrida, Hanna L. Stiller, Peer W. Kämmerer and Christian Walter
Dent. J. 2025, 13(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13010011 - 26 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2374
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Recent research has indicated that placing dental implants in patients diagnosed with bruxism has led to higher rates of implant failure. This study aimed to provide more accurate knowledge about the relationship between bruxism and implant loss in patients (number, age, gender) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Recent research has indicated that placing dental implants in patients diagnosed with bruxism has led to higher rates of implant failure. This study aimed to provide more accurate knowledge about the relationship between bruxism and implant loss in patients (number, age, gender) with different numbers of implants and prosthetic restorations, considering the follow-up time, compared to non-bruxers. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane Library using the keyword combination “dental implant”, “bruxism”, and “implant failure”. This search had no language or time restrictions. Results: The review included 15 papers, which were divided into four groups. The first group focused on studies regarding implant loss regardless of the superstructure. In the second group, research on implant-supported removable prostheses was examined. The third group consisted of a single study specifically addressing implant-supported single crowns. Lastly, the fourth group comprised two studies investigating implant-supported single crowns and fixed partial dentures. Only three out of the fifteen studies failed to find a correlation between bruxism and implant failure. The meta-analysis shows a significant pooled effect across the included studies, with an odds ratio of 4.68. Conclusions: Bruxism is a probable risk factor for mechanical issues in implant-supported prostheses and implant-supported crowns. Additionally, elevated failure rates have been documented in patients with bruxism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Factors in Implantology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 691 KiB  
Systematic Review
Coating Materials to Prevent Screw Loosening in Single Dental Implant Crowns: A Systematic Review
by Lara Coelho, Maria-Cristina Manzanares-Céspedes, Joana Mendes, Victòria Tallón-Walton, Wilson Astudillo-Rozas, Carlos Aroso and José Manuel Mendes
Materials 2024, 17(20), 5053; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17205053 - 16 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1675
Abstract
Oral rehabilitation with dental implants has resulted in high success rates. However, some complications have been described, such as the loss of the prosthetic screw. Some manufacturers sell screws with different coatings to avoid screw loosening, but even these types of screws can [...] Read more.
Oral rehabilitation with dental implants has resulted in high success rates. However, some complications have been described, such as the loss of the prosthetic screw. Some manufacturers sell screws with different coatings to avoid screw loosening, but even these types of screws can come loose. We aimed to investigate the screw coatings that can be applied during a dental appointment to avoid screw loosening. Following PRISMA Guidelines, we searched PubMed/Medline, Embase and Web of Science for studies published up to January 2024. All studies of single dental implant crowns, in which the prosthetic screw was coated with a lubricant and the preload and/or the removal torque value (RTV) was recorded, were analyzed. We excluded studies applying the finite element method (FEM) as well as studies without a control group. The risk of bias was assessed with a tool developed by our research group. Of the 1959 records identified, 19 were selected. Ten studies were considered to have a low risk of bias, and nine were considered to have a medium risk of bias. The coatings tested were adhesives, saliva, chlorhexidine, Vaseline, silicone gel, Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape, blood, fluoride, Listerine® Mouthwash and normal saline. The preload, the RTV with and without cyclic loading and the percentage of RTV loss were recorded. Some coatings show promise, although there is no clear evidence that any option is superior in minimizing screw loosening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterials for Restorative Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5335 KiB  
Article
Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Agenesis of Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A 2-Year Prospective Clinical Study with Full Digital Workflow
by Roberto Sorrentino, Maria Irene Di Mauro, Gennaro Ruggiero, Renato Leone, Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco, Marco Annunziata, Marco Ferrari and Fernando Zarone
Prosthesis 2024, 6(4), 803-816; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040057 - 16 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1209
Abstract
The main objectives of the present prospective clinical study were to evaluate the survival and success rates of implant-supported zirconia single crowns fabricated with a full digital workflow for the rehabilitation of mono- and bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors after 2 years [...] Read more.
The main objectives of the present prospective clinical study were to evaluate the survival and success rates of implant-supported zirconia single crowns fabricated with a full digital workflow for the rehabilitation of mono- and bilateral agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors after 2 years of clinical function; biological and technical parameters affecting the prosthetic restorations were recorded, as well as the patient-satisfaction score. Twenty-two patients showing mono- or bilateral agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisors were included in this study, and a total of 30 narrow-diameter implants were inserted. Thirty screw-retained monolithic cubic zirconia single crowns with internal connections were fabricated. Objective outcome evaluations were performed by means of the Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score, whereas the patient-satisfaction score was evaluated using Visual Analog Scales. Descriptive statistics were performed and the Kaplan–Meier analysis was run to analyze time-to-event data. After 2 years of clinical function, the overall FIPS found in the present study was 9.2, whereas the average patient-satisfaction score was 8.7. The Kaplan–Meier analysis at the 2-year follow-up reported a cumulative survival rate of 100% and a cumulative success rate of 93.3%. The implant-prosthetic rehabilitation with a full digital workflow proved to be an effective and reliable procedure for the functional and aesthetic treatment of the agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors in the short-term. Clinical investigations with wider sample populations and longer observational follow-ups could be useful to validate, in the long-term, the clinical outcomes of the present prospective clinical study. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4573 KiB  
Article
Influence of CAD/CAM Manufacturing Technique and Implant Abutment Angulation on Loosening of Individual Screw-Retained Implant Crowns
by Aitana Rico-Coderch, Luis F. Félix, María Fernanda Solá-Ruiz, Michell Medina, Rubén Agustín-Panadero, Rocío Ortega, Rocío Cascos and Miguel Gómez-Polo
Metals 2024, 14(7), 816; https://doi.org/10.3390/met14070816 - 15 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1507
Abstract
Background: Dental implant abutment screw loosening is an increasingly common problem, as evidenced by multiple studies that have investigated its causes. The objective of this study was to compare the screw loosening torque values before and after cyclic loading and to determine whether [...] Read more.
Background: Dental implant abutment screw loosening is an increasingly common problem, as evidenced by multiple studies that have investigated its causes. The objective of this study was to compare the screw loosening torque values before and after cyclic loading and to determine whether they are affected by the CAD/CAM abutment manufacturing technique (machined or laser-sintered) and abutment angulation. Materials and Methods: Ninety implants were used and divided into two groups: 45 implants received machined abutments (group A) and 45 implants received laser-sintered abutments (group B). Each group was further divided into three subgroups, with 15 implants each, based on the abutment angulation involved (0°, 15° and 20°). The abutments were tightened to the torque recommended by the manufacturer, and the reverse torque value was measured before and after cyclic loading (300,000 cycles). Data analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the laser-sintered and machined groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, differences were observed between subgroups with different angulations for both machined (16.2 ± 1.75, 14.7 ± 1.74 and 13.4 ± 1.08 Ncm) and laser-sintered abutments (14.6 ± 1.25, 12.7 ± 1.2 and 11.1 ± 1.35 Ncm) (0°, 15° and 20°, respectively). Conclusions: The final screw loosening torque after cyclic loading was lower than the initial loosening torque. Both abutment angulation and the CAD/CAM manufacturing method exerted a statistically significant influence on the final loosening torque. The abutment angulation factor was estimated to have an influence of 34.5%, while the abutment manufacturing method was estimated to have an influence of 21%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Metallic Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 463 KiB  
Article
Additive Manufacturing Titanium Dental Implants Placed in Sinuses Grafted with 70HA:30-TCP: A One-Year Retrospective Study for Evaluation of Survival Rate
by Ilton José Mafra, Dimorvan Bordin, Rafael S. Siroma, Vittorio Moraschini, Leonardo P. Faverani, João Gabriel Souza, Carlos Fernando Mourão and Jamil Awad Shibli
Dent. J. 2024, 12(6), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12060181 - 13 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1873
Abstract
The present short-term retrospective study evaluated the implant survival rate and peri-implant bone loss around additive-manufactured titanium implants placed in sinuses grafted with Plenum Osshp (Plenum Bioengenharia, Jundia, SP, Brazil) (70HA:30β-TCP) material. A total of 39 implants were inserted after 23 sinus floor [...] Read more.
The present short-term retrospective study evaluated the implant survival rate and peri-implant bone loss around additive-manufactured titanium implants placed in sinuses grafted with Plenum Osshp (Plenum Bioengenharia, Jundia, SP, Brazil) (70HA:30β-TCP) material. A total of 39 implants were inserted after 23 sinus floor elevation procedures in 16 consecutive patients. Prosthetic rehabilitation included fixed partial prostheses (three units), single crowns (eleven units), and fixed full arches (three units). Clinical and radiographic parameters of implant-supported restorations were evaluated after at least one year of occlusal loading. The implant–crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility, an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact (DIB) < 1.0 mm from the initial surgery, and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant–abutment interface. The overall cumulative implant survival rate was 97.43%. No prosthetic complications at the implant–abutment interface were reported. After one year, the mean DIB was 0.23 mm ± 0.14. Within the limits of this retrospective study, it can be concluded that 70 HA:30 β-TCP allowed stable and reliable bone support to maintain healthy conditions around titanium dental implants produced by additive manufacturing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2753 KiB  
Case Report
Immediate Implant Placement at an Inflammatory Periapical Cyst Site in the Aesthetic Area
by Alexandre Perez, Mathilde Layac and Tommaso Lombardi
Oral 2024, 4(2), 263-273; https://doi.org/10.3390/oral4020021 - 4 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2758
Abstract
A healthy 47-year-old woman consulted the Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit of the University Hospitals of Geneva with a request to treat her painful tooth 11 and replace the missing tooth 21. The dental history revealed that the patient had lost teeth 21 [...] Read more.
A healthy 47-year-old woman consulted the Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit of the University Hospitals of Geneva with a request to treat her painful tooth 11 and replace the missing tooth 21. The dental history revealed that the patient had lost teeth 21 and 22 due to advanced caries. On clinical examination, tooth 11 showed an ill-fitting prosthetic crown with overhanging margins, an increased localized probing depth of 8 mm in the disto-vestibular area, and sensitivity to percussion. The edentulous site 21 showed horizontal bone atrophy. Radiological examination revealed a well-defined unilocular radiotransparent lesion surrounded by a thin radiolucent border, located at the apex of tooth 11 and measuring 10 × 8 mm. The treatment consisted of extraction of 11, enucleation of the apical lesion, and insertion of implants at sites 11 and 21 with simultaneous bone augmentation in a single surgical procedure, with aesthetic and functional results at 3-year follow-up without any complications. Our case highlights that immediate implant placement in cases of cystic periapical lesions represents a good valid alternative to standard treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop