Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = serrapeptase

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 4468 KB  
Article
Serrapeptase Eliminates Escherichia coli Biofilms by Targeting Curli Fibers, Lipopolysaccharides, and Phosphate Metabolism
by Georgios Katsipis, Michalis Aivaliotis and Anastasia A. Pantazaki
Microorganisms 2025, 13(8), 1875; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13081875 - 11 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2766
Abstract
Escherichia coli biofilms are implicated in the development of persistent infections and increased antibiotic resistance, posing a significant challenge in clinical settings. These biofilms enhance bacterial survival by forming protective extracellular matrices, rendering conventional treatments less effective. Serrapeptase (SPT), a proteolytic enzyme, has [...] Read more.
Escherichia coli biofilms are implicated in the development of persistent infections and increased antibiotic resistance, posing a significant challenge in clinical settings. These biofilms enhance bacterial survival by forming protective extracellular matrices, rendering conventional treatments less effective. Serrapeptase (SPT), a proteolytic enzyme, has emerged as a potential anti-biofilm agent due to its ability to degrade biofilm components and disrupt bacterial adhesion. In this study, we report the inhibitory effect of SPT against E. coli biofilm and its effect on key virulence factors. In vitro assays, including crystal violet staining, optical and fluorescence microscopy, and viability measurements, revealed the dose-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation (IC50 = 14.2 ng/mL), reduced biofilm (−92%, 500 ng/mL) and planktonic viability (−45%, 500 ng/mL), and a marked loss of amyloid curli fibers. SPT treatment also lowered the levels of key virulence factors: cellular and secreted lipopolysaccharides (−76%, 8 ng/mL; −94%, 32 ng/mL), flagellin (−63%, 8 ng/mL), and peptidoglycan (−29%, 125 ng/mL). Mechanistically, SPT induced a phosphate-dysregulating response: secreted alkaline phosphatase activity rose (+70%, 125 ng/mL) while cellular DING/PstS proteins declined (−84%, 64 ng/mL), correlating strongly with biofilm inhibition. In silico docking further suggests direct interactions between SPT and the curli subunits CsgA and CsgB, potentially blocking fiber polymerization. Together, these findings position SPT as a powerful non-antibiotic biofilm disruptor against E. coli, offering a promising strategy to undermine bacterial persistence and resistance by targeting both structural matrix components and metabolic regulatory pathways. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 6162 KB  
Article
Assessment of Healing Potential of Bombyx mori L. (Silkworm) Derivatives on Second-Degree Burns: Dose-Response and Combination Therapy Analysis
by Evrydiki Katsikari, Alexandra Kyriaki, Andreas Vitsos, Margarita Vidali, Paschalis Harizanis, Ioannis Sfiniadakis, Maria Kostaki, Dimitra Ieronymaki, Asimina Terezaki, Georgios Ladopoulos, Chara Albani, Christina Barda and Michail Christou Rallis
Medicines 2025, 12(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines12020011 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1301
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Burn injuries present significant treatment challenges due to the intricate nature of the healing process. Bombyx mori L. (silkworm) derivatives, containing healing-promoting proteins such as sericin and fibroin, as well as the anti-inflammatory enzyme serrapeptase, have shown promise as potential healing agents. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Burn injuries present significant treatment challenges due to the intricate nature of the healing process. Bombyx mori L. (silkworm) derivatives, containing healing-promoting proteins such as sericin and fibroin, as well as the anti-inflammatory enzyme serrapeptase, have shown promise as potential healing agents. This study aimed to identify the optimal dosage of silkworm body and gland extracts for burn healing, compare the selected dose’s effectiveness with that of silkworm cocoons, and assess the combined healing effects of a cocoon dressing and a silkworm body extract gel. Methods: An experimental model was employed using hairless SKH-hr2 female mice subjected to standardized second-degree burns. The mice received treatments with various formulations of silkworm body and gland extracts, silkworm cocoons, and a combined application of a cocoon dressing and silkworm body extract gel. Results: The most effective treatments were the cocoon dressing and the combination of cocoon dressing with 60% body extract gel. By Day 20, complete healing (100%) was observed in the 20% and 60% body and gland extract groups, while the cocoon and 60% gland extract groups exhibited 60% healing, significantly higher than the control group (0% healing). Wound contraction analysis showed the greatest reduction in surface area from Day 3 to Day 17 in the cocoon and 60% body extract groups (p < 0.05). Histopathological assessments revealed that the combination group exhibited the least tissue damage (score: 7), compared to the control (score: 10–13). Conclusions: The study highlights the poorly examined therapeutic potential of silkworm body and gland extracts, demonstrating their efficacy in accelerating burn healing. The effects observed by the silkworm cocoon and body extract suggests a novel and promising approach for burn wound management, warranting further clinical exploration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section New Drugs Exploration and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4235 KB  
Article
Comparative Evaluation of Wound Healing Efficacy of Bombyx mori L. Body Extracts, Gland Extracts, and Cocoon for the Treatment of Second-Degree Burns: A Pilot Study
by Alexandra Kyriaki, Margarita Vidali, Andreas Vitsos, Paschalis Harizanis, Ioannis Sfiniadakis, Christina Barda, Eleftheria Simirioti, Asimina Terezaki and Michail Christou Rallis
Processes 2024, 12(11), 2594; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112594 - 18 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1549
Abstract
Background: The silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) and its cocoon are rich in bioactive proteins like sericin and fibroin, as well as enzymes such as serrapeptase, which possess anti-inflammatory and skin-healing properties. This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo effects of various [...] Read more.
Background: The silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) and its cocoon are rich in bioactive proteins like sericin and fibroin, as well as enzymes such as serrapeptase, which possess anti-inflammatory and skin-healing properties. This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo effects of various silkworm products, including cocoon patches and extracts from the silkworm body and glands, on the healing of second-degree burns. Methods: Hairless, female SKH-2 mice were used to model second-degree burns. The study tested formulations containing 1%, 10%, or 20% silkworm body or gland extracts, as well as cocoon-derived patches. In addition to histopathological and clinical assessments, the study measured parameters including burn size, hydration, transepidermal water loss and thickness. Results: The results of this study demonstrated that, in terms of primary outcomes (complete healing), both the silkworm cocoon and the 20% body extract significantly promoted wound healing, with similar efficacy. All body extracts showed statistical significance in wound area reduction, while the gland extracts had no significant effect. Histopathological evaluation confirmed the superior healing potential of the body extracts increasing by increased concentration and cocoon. This novel insight into the therapeutic properties of silkworm body extracts opens new opportunities for the development of cost-effective, renewable second-degree burn healing treatments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research of Bioactive Synthetic and Natural Products Chemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop