Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = septic abortion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
5 pages, 617 KiB  
Case Report
Septic Abortion at 17 Weeks Gestation after Radical Trachelectomy and Transabdominal Cerclage: A Case Report
by Lisa A. McNamee, Sharon Amir and Kiger Lau
Reprod. Med. 2024, 5(3), 181-185; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5030016 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1869
Abstract
Septic abortion can lead to severe maternal morbidity and mortality. The management of septic abortion can be complicated by a history of radical trachelectomy and transabdominal cerclage placement. A 33-year-old G1P0 at 17 weeks and 6 days gestation presented in severe septic shock [...] Read more.
Septic abortion can lead to severe maternal morbidity and mortality. The management of septic abortion can be complicated by a history of radical trachelectomy and transabdominal cerclage placement. A 33-year-old G1P0 at 17 weeks and 6 days gestation presented in severe septic shock after being diagnosed 6 days prior with previable rupture of membranes at an outside hospital and managed expectantly. History was notable for cervical adenocarcinoma status post radical trachelectomy and transabdominal cerclage placement. Due to uterine occlusion from the cerclage, the patient underwent emergent uterine evacuation via an abdominal approach. The risks and benefits of expectant management of pre-viable rupture of membranes in patients with abdominal cerclage should be weighed very cautiously. Among women with abdominal cerclage for whom uterine evacuation is indicated, a transabdominal approach may be necessary. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 886 KiB  
Article
Failure Rate of Medical Treatment for Miscarriage Correlated with the Difference between Gestational Age According to Last Menstrual Period and Gestational Size Calculated via Ultrasound
by Ohad Gluck, Elad Barber, Matan Friedman, Ohad Feldstein, Ori Tal, Ehud Grinstein, Yossi Mizrachi, Ram Kerner, Michal Saidian, Mai Menasherof and Ron Sagiv
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(19), 6112; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196112 - 22 Sep 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1895
Abstract
Objective: To study whether the interval between gestational age calculated using the last menstrual period (GA-LMP) and gestational age calculated via ultrasound (GA-US) is correlated with the success rate of medical treatment in cases of miscarriages. Methods: This was a retrospective [...] Read more.
Objective: To study whether the interval between gestational age calculated using the last menstrual period (GA-LMP) and gestational age calculated via ultrasound (GA-US) is correlated with the success rate of medical treatment in cases of miscarriages. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a gynecology unit in a tertiary medical center. Women who underwent medical treatment with Misoprostol for miscarriage at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center between 07/2015 and 12/2020 were included. Incomplete or septic miscarriages, multiple pregnancies, patients with irregular periods, and cases of missing data were excluded. Failure of medical treatment was defined as the need for surgical intervention due to a retained gestational sac, severe bleeding or retained products of conception. The cohort study was divided into two groups: patients with successful treatment and patients for whom surgical intervention was eventually needed. We performed both a univariate and multivariate analysis in order to identify whether a correlation between GA-LMP and GA-US interval is indeed a factor in the success rate of a medical abortion. Results: Overall, 778 patients were included in the study. From this cohort 582 (74.9%) had undergone a successful medical treatment, while 196 (25.1%) required surgical intervention due to the failure of medical treatment, as defined above. The GA-LMP to GA-US interval (in weeks) was 2.6 ± 1.4 in the success group, while the GA in the failure group was 3.1 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001). After performing a multivariant regression analysis, we were able to show that the GA-LMP to GA-US interval was found to be independently correlated with an increase in the treatment failure rate (aOR = 1.24, CI 95% (1.01–1.51), p = 0.03). Conclusions: In cases of miscarriage, longer GA-LMP to GA-US interval has been shown to be an independently correlated factor to lower success rate of the medical treatment option. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Pregnancy Complications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop