Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = rolling and flying locomotion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 10358 KB  
Article
Design and Control of a Reconfigurable Robot with Rolling and Flying Locomotion
by Qing Chang, Biao Yu, Hongwei Ji, Haifeng Li, Tiantian Yuan, Xiangyun Zhao, Hongsheng Ren and Jinhao Zhan
Actuators 2024, 13(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/act13010027 - 9 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2629
Abstract
Given the continual rise in mission diversity and environmental complexity, the adept integration of a robot’s aerial and terrestrial locomotion modes to address diverse application scenarios has evolved into a formidable challenge. In this paper, we design a reconfigurable airframe robot endowed with [...] Read more.
Given the continual rise in mission diversity and environmental complexity, the adept integration of a robot’s aerial and terrestrial locomotion modes to address diverse application scenarios has evolved into a formidable challenge. In this paper, we design a reconfigurable airframe robot endowed with the dual functionalities of rolling and flying. This innovative design not only ensures a lightweight structure but also incorporates morphing capabilities facilitated by a slider-crank mechanism. Subsequently, a land-to-air transformation strategy for the robot is introduced, achieved through the coordinated movement of the robotic arm and the servo motor. To ensure stable control of the robot amid external wind disturbances, we leverage the collaboration between a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)and a Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) controller. After the wind force magnitude is predicted through the neural network, the robot’s adeptness in flexible trajectory tracking is verified. Under simulated wind conditions of 12.1 m/s, the trajectory error consistently remains within the range of 10–15 cm, affirming the effectiveness of this control method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Actuators for Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4212 KB  
Article
Orientation Control System: Enhancing Aerial Maneuvers for Quadruped Robots
by Francesco Roscia, Andrea Cumerlotti, Andrea Del Prete, Claudio Semini and Michele Focchi
Sensors 2023, 23(3), 1234; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031234 - 20 Jan 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6349
Abstract
For legged robots, aerial motions are the only option to overpass obstacles that cannot be circumvented with standard locomotion gaits. In these cases, the robot must perform a leap to either jump onto the obstacle or fly over it. However, these movements represent [...] Read more.
For legged robots, aerial motions are the only option to overpass obstacles that cannot be circumvented with standard locomotion gaits. In these cases, the robot must perform a leap to either jump onto the obstacle or fly over it. However, these movements represent a challenge, because, during the flight phase, the Center of Mass (CoM) cannot be controlled, and there is limited controllability over the orientation of the robot. This paper focuses on the latter issue and proposes an Orientation Control System (OCS), consisting of two rotating and actuated masses (flywheels or reaction wheels), to gain control authority on the orientation of the robot. Due to the conservation of angular momentum, the rotational velocity if the robot can be adjusted to steer the robot’s orientation, even when the robot has no contact with the ground. The axes of rotation of the flywheels are designed to be incident, leading to a compact orientation control system that is capable of controlling both roll and pitch angles, considering the different moments of inertia in the two directions. The concept was tested by means of simulations on the robot Solo12. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Intelligent Systems and Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop