Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = previable rupture of membranes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
5 pages, 617 KiB  
Case Report
Septic Abortion at 17 Weeks Gestation after Radical Trachelectomy and Transabdominal Cerclage: A Case Report
by Lisa A. McNamee, Sharon Amir and Kiger Lau
Reprod. Med. 2024, 5(3), 181-185; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5030016 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1869
Abstract
Septic abortion can lead to severe maternal morbidity and mortality. The management of septic abortion can be complicated by a history of radical trachelectomy and transabdominal cerclage placement. A 33-year-old G1P0 at 17 weeks and 6 days gestation presented in severe septic shock [...] Read more.
Septic abortion can lead to severe maternal morbidity and mortality. The management of septic abortion can be complicated by a history of radical trachelectomy and transabdominal cerclage placement. A 33-year-old G1P0 at 17 weeks and 6 days gestation presented in severe septic shock after being diagnosed 6 days prior with previable rupture of membranes at an outside hospital and managed expectantly. History was notable for cervical adenocarcinoma status post radical trachelectomy and transabdominal cerclage placement. Due to uterine occlusion from the cerclage, the patient underwent emergent uterine evacuation via an abdominal approach. The risks and benefits of expectant management of pre-viable rupture of membranes in patients with abdominal cerclage should be weighed very cautiously. Among women with abdominal cerclage for whom uterine evacuation is indicated, a transabdominal approach may be necessary. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3163 KiB  
Review
Maternal Outcomes Following Active vs. Expectant Management of Previable Preterm Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes: A Meta-Analysis
by Megan A. Sylvester, Gabrielle Mintz and Giovanni Sisti
Children 2023, 10(8), 1347; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081347 - 4 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3182
Abstract
The diagnosis of previable preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM) is known to be associated with poor outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Following previable preterm PROM, patients are generally offered either active management through the termination of the pregnancy or [...] Read more.
The diagnosis of previable preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM) is known to be associated with poor outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Following previable preterm PROM, patients are generally offered either active management through the termination of the pregnancy or expectant management to increase the chances of fetal survival. It is difficult to counsel patients because there is a lack of data directly comparing maternal outcomes following active vs. expectant management. Using the data in the current literature, the goal of the present meta-analysis was to determine if there were any differences in terms of maternal risks when active versus elective management was chosen. PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched. We found four studies accounting for a total of 506 patients. The risk ratio (RR) of chorioamnionitis in active vs. expectant management was 0.30 (with a 95% confidence interval, CI, of 0.09–1.02). The heterogeneity of the study results was 81% (I2). A sub–analysis of two included studies revealed an RR of postpartum hemorrhage in active vs. expectant management of 0.75 (95% CI 0.27–2.07) and an RR of maternal sepsis of 0.23 (95% CI 0.04–1.28). The heterogeneity of the study results for this sub-analysis was 68% (I2) for postpartum hemorrhage and 0% (I2) for maternal sepsis. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, or maternal sepsis when active management was chosen over expectant management in previable preterm PROM at <24 weeks. The scarcity and the high heterogeneity of the available data likely contributed to the lack of statistical significance and calls for further work directly comparing maternal outcomes following active vs. expectant management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 730 KiB  
Article
Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes before Viability in Twin Pregnancies: What Can We Expect?
by Júlia Ponce, Teresa Cobo, Clara Murillo, Anna Gonce, Nadia Domínguez, Francesca Crovetto, Laura Guirado, Montse Palacio and Mar Bennasar
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(8), 2949; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082949 - 18 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3804
Abstract
Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROMs) before viability carries significant perinatal mortality and morbidity. Clinical management and prenatal counselling are a challenge, especially in twin pregnancies, due to scarce evidence on how previable PPROM affects this population. The aim of this study was [...] Read more.
Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROMs) before viability carries significant perinatal mortality and morbidity. Clinical management and prenatal counselling are a challenge, especially in twin pregnancies, due to scarce evidence on how previable PPROM affects this population. The aim of this study was to describe pregnancy outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated with previable PPROM and evaluate potential prognostic factors that may predict perinatal mortality. A retrospective cohort including dichorionic and monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies complicated with PPROM before 24 + 0 weeks of pregnancy was evaluated. Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies managed expectantly were described. Factors predicting perinatal mortality or reaching periviability (defined from 23 + 0 weeks onwards) were evaluated. Of the 45 patients included, 7 (15.6%) spontaneously delivered within the first 24 h after diagnosis. Two patients (5.3%) requested selective termination of the affected twin. In the 36 ongoing pregnancies that opted for expectant management, the overall survival rate was 35/72 (48.6%). There were 25/36 (69.4%) patients who delivered after 23 + 0 weeks of pregnancy. When periviability was achieved, neonatal survival increased up to 35/44 (79.5%). Gestational age at delivery was the only independent risk factor of perinatal mortality. The overall survival rate of twin pregnancies complicated with previable PPROM is poor but similar to singletons. No prognostic factors, apart from achieving periviability, were identified as individual predictors of perinatal mortality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Twin and Multiple Pregnancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 336 KiB  
Review
The Management of Pregnancy Complicated with the Previable Preterm and Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes: What about a Limit of Neonatal Viability?—A Review
by Stepan Feduniw, Zuzanna Gaca, Olga Malinowska, Weronika Brunets, Magdalena Zgliczyńska, Marta Włodarczyk, Anna Wójcikiewicz and Michał Ciebiera
Diagnostics 2022, 12(8), 2025; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12082025 - 22 Aug 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5682
Abstract
Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) at the limit of viability is associated with low neonatal survival rates and a high rate of neonatal complications in survivors. It carries a major risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. The limit of viability can [...] Read more.
Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) at the limit of viability is associated with low neonatal survival rates and a high rate of neonatal complications in survivors. It carries a major risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. The limit of viability can be defined as the earliest stage of fetal maturity when a fetus has a reasonable chance, although not a high likelihood, for extra-uterine survival. The study reviews available data on preventing preterm delivery caused by the previable PPROM, pregnancy latency, therapeutic options including the use of antibiotics and steroids, neonatal outcomes, and future directions and opportunities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Prenatal Diagnostics)
14 pages, 203 KiB  
Review
Economical Analysis of Different Clinical Approaches in Pre-Viability Amniorrhexis—A Case Series
by Samuel Engemise, Fiona Thompson and William Davies
J. Clin. Med. 2014, 3(1), 25-38; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm3010025 - 9 Jan 2014
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5918
Abstract
Prolonged oligohydramnios following extreme preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (EPPROM) is traditionally associated with a high morbidity and mortality to both the mother and the baby. The clinical maternal evaluation and fetal ultrasound assessment may provide important prognostic information for the clinicians and [...] Read more.
Prolonged oligohydramnios following extreme preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (EPPROM) is traditionally associated with a high morbidity and mortality to both the mother and the baby. The clinical maternal evaluation and fetal ultrasound assessment may provide important prognostic information for the clinicians and should be taken into account when counselling the patients so as to provide them with enough information to make decision of continuing or interrupting the pregnancy. Current financial constraints on the National Healthcare Service (NHS) resources make it imperative for clinical decision-makers and budgetary planners to make the right decision of continuing or terminating a second trimester pre-viability amniorrhexis for desperate parents. To assess the economic consequences following EPPROM, the risk of infection to both baby and mother, psychological impact on the parents and associated complications and further disability after delivery on this fragile group of patients to the NHS resources. We review the clinical course, outcome, and the challenges to parents and health care professionals on three pregnancies complicated by EPPROM, occurring before 24 weeks’ gestation with a membrane rupture to delivery interval (latent period) of 14 days or more. The anticipated birth of an extremely premature infant poses many challenges for parents and health care professionals. As parents are faced with difficult decisions that can have a long-term impact on the infant, family and country’s resources, it is critical to provide the type of information and support that is needed by them. Taking all these into consideration with the period of ventilation and respiratory assistance in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is essential to provide maximum chances for survival, minimizing the risk for long term sequelae of the neonate and provides the parents enough time to decide on making the right decision with the associated guidance of the healthcare provider. Full article
Back to TopTop