Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (27)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = preoperative breast localization

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 5614 KiB  
Review
Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: The Value of a Two Team Approach
by Amanda Fazzalari, Ryoko Hamaguchi, Candice Leach, Justin Broyles and Anna Weiss
Lymphatics 2025, 3(3), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics3030018 - 8 Jul 2025
Viewed by 241
Abstract
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating complication in breast cancer survivors, with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as the greatest independent risk factor. Beyond non-surgical therapies such as complete decongestive and compression therapy, there has been increased interest in immediate microsurgical reconstruction [...] Read more.
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating complication in breast cancer survivors, with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as the greatest independent risk factor. Beyond non-surgical therapies such as complete decongestive and compression therapy, there has been increased interest in immediate microsurgical reconstruction via immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) anastomosing transected lymphatic vessels to a local venous recipient at the time of ALND to mitigate the risks of BCRL. This work provides a scoping review of the landscape surrounding ILR, spanning the updated literature investigating patient outcomes, current accepted best practices, and critical components of surgical techniques for a successful multidisciplinary approach. While limited by heterogeneity in the methods of lymphedema detection, a growing body of work demonstrates the protective effects of ILR. From the pioneering work by Boccardo et al. in 2009 and his introduction of Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA) using an intussusception-type end-to-end microanastmosis, to the first randomized control trial by Coriddi in 2023, which importantly employed relative upper extremity volume change as an outcome measure to circumvent the confounding effects of body size and BMI, the current literature supports ILR following ALND in the prevention of BCRL. Collaboration between the oncologic breast surgeon and reconstructive microsurgeon are central to the success of ILR. Critical components for operative success include preoperative and intraoperative lymphatic mapping, preservation of suitable venous targets, availability of supermicrosurgical instruments and sutures, as well as aptitude with a variety of microsurgical anastomotic techniques. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 4333 KiB  
Article
Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound Mapping of the Superficial Circumflex Iliac and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Vessels: An Anatomical Study
by Spencer Chia-Hao Kuo, Ryo Karakawa, Hirofumi Imai, Shintaro Kagimoto, Yukio Seki, Nobuko Suesada, Hidehiko Yoshimatsu and Tomoyuki Yano
Diagnostics 2025, 15(10), 1210; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101210 - 11 May 2025
Viewed by 524
Abstract
Background: The superficial vessel system in the lower abdomen, including the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA), is widely used in reconstructive microsurgery. Preoperative ultrasonography, particularly ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS), enhances surgical planning by providing high-resolution imaging. This study [...] Read more.
Background: The superficial vessel system in the lower abdomen, including the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA), is widely used in reconstructive microsurgery. Preoperative ultrasonography, particularly ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS), enhances surgical planning by providing high-resolution imaging. This study aimed to utilize UHFUS to examine the SCIA, SCIV, SIEA, and SIEV for reconstructive surgery planning. Methods: This prospective study included 25 patients undergoing free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Patients with horizontal lower abdominal scars were excluded. Preoperative UHFUS, using a 48 MHz transducer, was performed to map and measure the superficial branch of SCIA (sSCIA), SCIV, SIEA, and SIEV. The vessel location, diameter, depth, and course were documented and analyzed. Results: Twenty-five female patients (50 hemiabdomens) aged 41 to 66 were included. The mean BMI was 21.6 kg/m2 (range: 18.4–30.4 kg/m2). At the ASIS level, the mean diameter of the sSCIA, SIEA, SCIV, and SIEV were 0.76 mm, 0.63 mm, 1.72 mm, and 2.18 mm, respectively. A superior lateral pedicle course was observed in 98% of the sSCIA. All patients had at least one detectable superficial artery, with 96% showing detectable arteries on both sides of the lower abdomen. Conclusions: UHFUS effectively maps superficial vessels in the lower abdomen for reconstructive surgery. The SCIA and SCIV are reliably detectable, while the SIEA is less consistently identified. UHFUS enhances flap design by providing precise vessel localization and sizing, leading to safer and more efficient surgeries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2046 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Hologic LOCalizer™ RFID Tags for Preoperative Localization of Breast Lesions: A Single-Center Experience
by Charlotte Munday, Anmol Malhotra, Sawsan Taif, Adeola Omotade, Arathi Menon and Kefah Mokbel
Diagnostics 2025, 15(6), 746; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060746 - 17 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 786
Abstract
Background: The increasing detection of non-palpable breast lesions necessitates accurate preoperative localization to ensure complete excision while preserving healthy tissue and optimizing cosmetic outcomes. Traditional wire-guided localization (WL) has been the gold standard; however, it has several drawbacks, including patient discomfort and [...] Read more.
Background: The increasing detection of non-palpable breast lesions necessitates accurate preoperative localization to ensure complete excision while preserving healthy tissue and optimizing cosmetic outcomes. Traditional wire-guided localization (WL) has been the gold standard; however, it has several drawbacks, including patient discomfort and scheduling challenges. This study evaluates the accuracy and feasibility of radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag localization using the Hologic LOCalizer™ system as an alternative technique. Methods: This retrospective study included 258 consecutive patients who underwent image-guided RFID tag localization from March 2021 to February 2023 from a single-center London breast unit. The primary outcome measured was the accuracy of RFID tag placement, defined as within 10 mm of the target lesion on post-clip mammograms. Secondary outcomes included type and size of lesions, re-excision rates, review of post-operative specimen radiographs, and patient demographics. Results: A total of 297 RFID tags were placed, with 95.6% accurately positioned within the target range. The median target size was 29 mm, with the most common abnormalities being mass lesions (64%). Among the 13 inaccurately placed RFID tags (4.4%), all were identified preoperatively, with two requiring additional wire placements. RFID tags were successfully identified in 92% of specimen radiographs, and 8% of patients required re-excision due to positive or close margins. Notably, patients with multiple RFID tags showed a higher incidence of re-excision. Conclusions: The LOCalizer™ RFID system demonstrated a high accuracy rate for preoperative localization of breast lesions, presenting a viable alternative to WL. This technique improves surgical scheduling flexibility and enhances patient comfort. Comparative studies with other wire-free localization technologies, such as magnetic seeds and radar reflectors, are needed to determine the optimal approach for clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 611 KiB  
Review
Borderline Phyllodes Breast Tumors: A Comprehensive Review of Recurrence, Histopathological Characteristics, and Treatment Modalities
by Fulvio Borella, Mauro Porpiglia, Niccolò Gallio, Chiara Cito, Lorenzo Boriglione, Giulia Capella, Paola Cassoni and Isabella Castellano
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(2), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020066 - 26 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2933
Abstract
Phyllodes tumors account for 2–3% of all fibroepithelial breast tumors and less than 1% of all breast cancers. These tumors are categorized into benign, borderline, or malignant based on cellular atypia, mitotic activity, and stromal overgrowth. Surgical excision with clear margins, ideally greater [...] Read more.
Phyllodes tumors account for 2–3% of all fibroepithelial breast tumors and less than 1% of all breast cancers. These tumors are categorized into benign, borderline, or malignant based on cellular atypia, mitotic activity, and stromal overgrowth. Surgical excision with clear margins, ideally greater than 1 cm, is the primary treatment for phyllodes tumors to ensure effective local control. Preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to the clinical and radiological similarities between phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas. The efficacy and role of adjuvant treatments remain subjects of ongoing debate and investigation. Borderline phyllodes tumors exhibit biological characteristics that straddle the line between benign and malignant, presenting significant clinical and surgical management challenges. Given the rarity of this specific subgroup and the ambiguity of the risk of recurrence or progression to malignant phyllodes, this narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the recurrence risk associated with these tumors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 445 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
by Farhad Ghasemi and Muriel Brackstone
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(10), 6007-6016; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100448 - 8 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2592
Abstract
The utility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is expanding in the treatment of breast cancer. Although individual trials have shown comparable survival between patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, large-scale data analyses for outcomes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) are lacking. We [...] Read more.
The utility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is expanding in the treatment of breast cancer. Although individual trials have shown comparable survival between patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, large-scale data analyses for outcomes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) are lacking. We conducted an individual-level statistical analysis using patients from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating survival outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by abstracting and analyzing only the patients with LABC. Individual patient data for 779 patients with LABC were collected from six RCTs. Overall and disease-free survival rates were compared between patients receiving neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy with the Cox hazard model and log-rank statistics. Since chemotoxicity causing delays to surgical care is a potential drawback of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, local cohort data were then employed to assess the actual incidence of this, along with the causes behind any delays to surgery in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A time interval from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery of >8 weeks was investigated in a local cohort of 563 patients, representing all locally treated patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2006 and 2019. The statistical analysis demonstrated no overall or disease-free survival differences in LABC patients receiving neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.96 and 0.74, respectively). Within our cohort, 31 (5.5%) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced a delay of >8 weeks to surgery, with only 13 (2.3%) attributed to chemotherapy-related complications. Our study provides further support for the paradigm shift towards delivering chemotherapy for breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1026 KiB  
Article
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Concurrent Letrozole for Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Nonrandomized Phase II Study (NeoCHAI)
by Heejung Chae, Sung Hoon Sim, Youngmi Kwon, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Jai Hong Han, So-Youn Jung, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, Yeon-Joo Kim, Tae Hyun Kim and Keun Seok Lee
Cancers 2024, 16(18), 3122; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183122 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1871
Abstract
The role of combining neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with conventional chemotherapy remains unclear; therefore, we conducted an open-label, single-center, nonrandomized phase II trial to assess the effect of this combination. Patients with previously untreated stage II or III HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer received concurrent [...] Read more.
The role of combining neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with conventional chemotherapy remains unclear; therefore, we conducted an open-label, single-center, nonrandomized phase II trial to assess the effect of this combination. Patients with previously untreated stage II or III HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer received concurrent letrozole 2.5 mg with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery. We used Simon’s minimax two-stage design; a pCR rate > 6% was necessary at the first stage to continue. Between November 2017 and November 2020, 53 women were enrolled in the first stage of the trial. Their median age was 49 years (range, 33–63), and 60% of them were premenopausal. Subsequently, 66% and 34% of patients with clinical stages II and III, respectively, were included; 93% had clinically node-positive disease. Two patients (4%) achieved pCR after neoadjuvant chemo–endocrine treatment, which did not satisfy the criteria for continuing to the second stage. The overall response rate was 83%. During the median follow-up of 53.7 months, the 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 87% and 98%, respectively. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 adverse event (40%), but rarely led to febrile neutropenic episodes (4%). Myalgia (32%), nausea (19%), constipation (17%), heartburn (11%), oral mucositis (9%), and sensory neuropathy (9%) were frequently observed, but classified as grade 1 or 2. No deaths occurred during preoperative treatment. The addition of letrozole to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy was safe and beneficial in terms of overall response rate, but did not provide a higher pCR rate in locally advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Further research is needed to enhance neoadjuvant treatment strategies for this cancer subtype. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 8064 KiB  
Article
Wirelessly Powered Visible Light-Emitting Implant for Surgical Guidance during Lumpectomy
by Sunghoon Rho, Roy A. Stillwell, Kedi Yan, Ana Flavia Borges de Almeida Barreto, Joshua R. Smith, Patrick Fay, Alice M. Police and Thomas D. O’Sullivan
Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5639; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175639 - 30 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1716
Abstract
Achieving negative surgical margins, defined as no tumor found on the edges of the resected tissue, during lumpectomy for breast cancer is critical for mitigating the risk of local recurrence. To identify nonpalpable tumors that cannot be felt, pre-operative placements of wire and [...] Read more.
Achieving negative surgical margins, defined as no tumor found on the edges of the resected tissue, during lumpectomy for breast cancer is critical for mitigating the risk of local recurrence. To identify nonpalpable tumors that cannot be felt, pre-operative placements of wire and wire-free localization devices are typically employed. Wire-free localization approaches have significant practical advantages over wired techniques. In this study, we introduce an innovative localization system comprising a light-emitting diode (LED)-based implantable device and handheld system. The device, which is needle injectable and wire free, utilizes multiple wirelessly powered LEDs to provide direct visual guidance for lumpectomy. Two distinct colors, red and blue, provide a clear indication of tissue depth: blue light is absorbed strongly in tissue, visible within a close range of <1 cm, while red light remains visible through several centimeters of tissue. The LEDs, integrated with an impedance-matching circuit and receiver coil, are encapsulated in biocompatible epoxy for injection with a 12 G needle. Our findings demonstrate that the implant exhibits clearly perceivable depth-dependent color changes and remains visible through >2 cm of ex vivo chicken breast and bovine muscle tissue using less than 4 W of transmitted power from a handheld antenna. These miniaturized needle-injectable localization devices show promise for improving surgical guidance of nonpalpable breast tumors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 238 KiB  
Article
Retrieval of the Clipped Axillary Lymph Node and Its Impact on Treatment Decisions
by David Detz Jr., Diego Hanssen, Junmin Whiting, Weihong Sun, Brian Czerniecki, Susan Hoover, Nazanin Khakpour, John Kiluk, Christine Laronga, Melissa Mallory, M. Catherine Lee and Laura Kruper
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 3001; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173001 - 29 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1188
Abstract
We examined clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and clipped lymph node (CLN) localization to determine the rate of CLN = non-sentinel lymph node (SLN), the factors associated with cN+ to pN0 conversion, and the treatment impact. We conducted a [...] Read more.
We examined clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and clipped lymph node (CLN) localization to determine the rate of CLN = non-sentinel lymph node (SLN), the factors associated with cN+ to pN0 conversion, and the treatment impact. We conducted a single institution review of cN+ patients receiving NAC from 2016 to 2022 with preoperative CLN localization (N = 81). Demographics, hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status, time to surgery, staging, chemotherapy regimen, localization method, pathology, and adjuvant therapy were analyzed. Pathologic complete response (pCR) of the CLN was observed in 41 patients (50.6%): 18.8% HR+/HER2−, 75% HR+/HER2+, 75% HR−/HER2+, and 62.5% triple-negative breast cancer (p-value = 0.006). CLN = SLN in 68 (84%) patients, while CLN = non-SLN in 13 (16%). In 14 (17.3%) patients, the final treatment was altered based on +CLN status: 11 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and 3 had systemic treatment changes. pCR rates varied, with the highest conversion rates observed in HER2+ disease and the lowest in HR+/HER2− disease. In 2 (2.5%) patients, adjuvant therapy changes were made based on a non-sentinel CLN, while in 97.5% of patients, a SLN biopsy alone represented the status of the axilla. This demonstrates that a +CLN often alters final plans and that, despite also being a SLN in most cases, a subset of patients will be undertreated by SLN biopsy alone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
17 pages, 1499 KiB  
Review
Escalation and De-Escalation of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: Strategies for Risk-Adapted Optimization
by Guenther Gruber
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 2946; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172946 - 23 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2688
Abstract
Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy (with risk factors). Consideration of pros and cons, including potential side effects, demands the optimization of adjuvant RT and a risk-adapted approach. There is clear de-escalation in fractionation—hypofractionation should be considered standard. For [...] Read more.
Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy (with risk factors). Consideration of pros and cons, including potential side effects, demands the optimization of adjuvant RT and a risk-adapted approach. There is clear de-escalation in fractionation—hypofractionation should be considered standard. For selected low-risk situations, PBI only or even the omission of RT might be appropriate. In contrast, tendencies toward escalating RT are obvious. Preoperative RT seems attractive for patients in whom breast reconstruction is planned or for defining the tumor location more precisely with the potential of giving ablative doses. Dose escalation by a (simultaneous integrated) boost or the combination with new compounds/systemic treatments may increase antitumor efficacy but also toxicity. Despite low evidence, RT for oligometastatic disease is becoming increasingly popular. The omission of axillary dissection in node-positive disease led to an escalation of regional RT. Studies are ongoing to test if any axillary treatment can be omitted and which oligometastatic patients do really benefit from RT. Besides technical improvements, the incorporation of molecular risk profiles and also the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy have the potential to optimize the decision-making concerning if and how local and/or regional RT should be administered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research and Progress in the Treatment of Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 719 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer—Retrospective Analysis
by Rares Georgescu, Flavian Tutuianu, Orsolya Bauer, Anca Toganel, Zalan Benedek, Eugeniu Darii, Sabin Turdean and Cristina Tutuianu Radoi
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 2930; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172930 - 23 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1684
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to identify preoperative factors that could be associated with positive resection margins. We also tried to analyze the local recurrence and overall survival in patients who received conservative treatment for early-stage breast cancer and correlate these [...] Read more.
The primary objective of this study was to identify preoperative factors that could be associated with positive resection margins. We also tried to analyze the local recurrence and overall survival in patients who received conservative treatment for early-stage breast cancer and correlate these parameters with preoperative factors. A retrospective examination was conducted on the medical records and pathological reports of 143 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer in our department from 2009 to 2017. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through phone contact and statistical analyses, including GraphPad Prism, and Fisher’s exact test, the Chi-square test, and the log-rank test were employed. The results revealed positive resection margins in 7.69% (11 cases) of the 143 patients, with an overall mortality rate of 16.66% for those with positive margins and 6.59% for those with negative margins. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in the overall (p = 0.5) or specific (p = 0.53) survival between the positive and negative margin groups. The positive margins were significantly associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) and the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (p = 0.01). Among the analyzed factors, two out of sixteen were significantly linked to positive resection margins in BCS, emphasizing their importance in surgical management planning for early-stage breast cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Management and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 790 KiB  
Article
Characteristics and Outcome of Surgically Treated Patients with Intradural Extra- and Intramedullary Spinal Metastasis—A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series and Review
by Hanna Veronika Salvotti, Alexander Lein, Martin Proescholdt, Nils-Ole Schmidt and Sebastian Siller
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(7), 4079-4092; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31070304 - 19 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1851
Abstract
Objective: Intradural spinal metastases are considered rare. At present, limited information is available on incidence, surgical management, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective patient chart review from 2002 to 2024, identifying all patients surgically treated for intradural spinal metastases. Clinical, surgical and [...] Read more.
Objective: Intradural spinal metastases are considered rare. At present, limited information is available on incidence, surgical management, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective patient chart review from 2002 to 2024, identifying all patients surgically treated for intradural spinal metastases. Clinical, surgical and survival data were collected and compared to literature data for patients surgically treated for extradural spinal metastases. Results: A total of 172 patients with spinal metastases were identified with 13 patients meeting inclusion criteria (7.6%). The mean age at diagnosis of intradural spinal metastases was 52 ± 22 years, with diverse primaries including lung (n = 3), breast (n = 2), sarcoma (n = 2), and six unique entities. Intradural spinal metastasis was diagnosed on average of 3.3 years after primary diagnosis. In total, we observed five (38%) intradural-extramedullary and eight (62%) intramedullary metastases, located in the cervical (38.5%), thoracic (46.1%) and lumbar spine (15.4%). The most common preoperative symptoms were pain, sensory changes, and gait ataxia (each 76.9%). Gross total resection was achieved in 54%, and local tumor control in 85%. Postoperatively, 92% exhibited clinical improvement or stability. Most frequent adjuvant treatment was radio- and/or chemotherapy in 85%. The average survival after operation for spinal intradural metastases was 5 months, ranging from 1 month to 120 months. The location of the intradural metastasis in the cervical spine was associated with a significantly more favorable survival outcome (compared to thoracic/lumbar location, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Intradural location of spinal metastases is rare (7.6%). Even so, surgical resection is safe and effective for neurological improvement, and survival appears lower compared to the reported survival of extradural spinal metastases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuro-Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 873 KiB  
Article
Acute and Long-Term Toxicity after Planned Intraoperative Boost and Whole Breast Irradiation in High-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer—Results from the Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy Boost Quality Registry (TARGIT BQR)
by Lukas Goerdt, Robert Schnaubelt, Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher, Viktoria Brück, Lelia Bauer, Stefan Dinges, Albert von der Assen, Heidrun Meye, Christina Kaiser, Christel Weiss, Sven Clausen, Frank Schneider, Yasser Abo-Madyan, Katharina Fleckenstein, Sebastian Berlit, Benjamin Tuschy, Marc Sütterlin, Frederik Wenz and Elena Sperk
Cancers 2024, 16(11), 2067; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112067 - 30 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1757
Abstract
In the context of breast cancer treatment optimization, this study prospectively examines the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in combination with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk patients. Different guidelines recommend such a tumor bed boost [...] Read more.
In the context of breast cancer treatment optimization, this study prospectively examines the feasibility and outcomes of utilizing intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in combination with standard external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk patients. Different guidelines recommend such a tumor bed boost in addition to whole breast irradiation with EBRT for patients with risk factors for local breast cancer recurrence. The TARGIT BQR (NCT01440010) is a prospective, multicenter registry study aimed at ensuring the quality of clinical outcomes. It provides, for the first time, data from a large cohort with a detailed assessment of acute and long-term toxicity following an IORT boost using low-energy X-rays. Inclusion criteria encompassed tumors up to 3.5 cm in size and preoperative indications for a boost. The IORT boost, administered immediately after tumor resection, delivered a single dose of 20 Gy. EBRT and systemic therapy adhered to local tumor board recommendations. Follow-up for toxicity assessment (LENT SOMA criteria: fibrosis, teleangiectasia, retraction, pain, breast edema, lymphedema, hyperpigmentation, ulceration) took place before surgery, 6 weeks to 90 days after EBRT, 6 months after IORT, and then annually using standardized case report forms (CRFs). Between 2011 and 2020, 1133 patients from 10 centers were preoperatively enrolled. The planned IORT boost was conducted in 90%, and EBRT in 97% of cases. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 1–120, 20.4% dropped out), with a median age of 61 years (range 30–90). No acute grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Acute side effects included erythema grade 1 or 2 in 4.4%, palpable seroma in 9.1%, punctured seroma in 0.3%, and wound healing disorders in 2.1%. Overall, chronic teleangiectasia of any grade occurred in 16.2%, fibrosis grade ≥ 2 in 14.3%, pain grade ≥ 2 in 3.4%, and hyperpigmentation in 1.1%. In conclusion, a tumor bed boost through IORT using low-energy X-rays is a swift and feasible method that demonstrates low rates in terms of acute or long-term toxicity profiles in combination with whole breast irradiation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Radiotherapy for Improved Clinical Benefit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3241 KiB  
Article
Machine Learning Predicts Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for ER+HER2- Breast Cancer: Integrating Tumoral and Peritumoral MRI Radiomic Features
by Jiwoo Park, Min Jung Kim, Jong-Hyun Yoon, Kyunghwa Han, Eun-Kyung Kim, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Young Han Lee and Yangmo Yoo
Diagnostics 2023, 13(19), 3031; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13193031 - 23 Sep 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2195
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ER+HER2- locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), a subtype with limited treatment response. Methods: We included 265 ER+HER2- LABC patients (2010–2020) with pre-treatment MRI, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and confirmed pathology. Using [...] Read more.
Background: This study aimed to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ER+HER2- locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), a subtype with limited treatment response. Methods: We included 265 ER+HER2- LABC patients (2010–2020) with pre-treatment MRI, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and confirmed pathology. Using data from January 2016, we divided them into training and validation cohorts. Volumes of interest (VOI) for the tumoral and peritumoral regions were segmented on preoperative MRI from three sequences: T1-weighted early and delayed contrast-enhanced sequences and T2-weighted fat-suppressed sequence (T2FS). We constructed seven machine learning models using tumoral, peritumoral, and combined texture features within and across the sequences, and evaluated their pCR prediction performance using AUC values. Results: The best single sequence model was SVM using a 1 mm tumor-to-peritumor VOI in the early contrast-enhanced phase (AUC = 0.9447). Among the combinations, the top-performing model was K-Nearest Neighbor, using 1 mm tumor-to-peritumor VOI in the early contrast-enhanced phase and 3 mm peritumoral VOI in T2FS (AUC = 0.9631). Conclusions: We suggest that a combined machine learning model that integrates tumoral and peritumoral radiomic features across different MRI sequences can provide a more accurate pretreatment pCR prediction for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+HER2- LABC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2981 KiB  
Article
Ultrasound Guided Arthroscopic Removal of Calcific Tendonitis: A Minimum of 2-Year Followup
by Syed Mohammed Taif Rizvi, David Qiu, Patrick Lam, Lisa Hackett, Judie Walton and George A. C. Murrell
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(9), 3114; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093114 - 25 Apr 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2872
Abstract
Background: We have developed a novel technique for managing rotator cuff calcific tendonitis, involving arthroscopic debridement of calcific tendonitis with localization assistance from a breast biopsy needle under ultrasound guidance. While we have demonstrated encouraging results at six-month follow-up, the medium-term outcomes and [...] Read more.
Background: We have developed a novel technique for managing rotator cuff calcific tendonitis, involving arthroscopic debridement of calcific tendonitis with localization assistance from a breast biopsy needle under ultrasound guidance. While we have demonstrated encouraging results at six-month follow-up, the medium-term outcomes and the long-term outcomes of this technique at 2 years or beyond are unknown. The aim of this paper was to determine if this technique was successful in resolving symptoms after two years and beyond. Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement of calcific tendonitis with localization assistance from a breast biopsy needle under ultrasound guidance by a senior surgeon were evaluated using patient-rated pain scores and functional status with the use of the Likert scales and via examiner-rated shoulder range-of-motion and strength at the pre-operative visit, at 1, 6, 12, and 24 weeks post-operatively, and long-term at a mean of 249 weeks after surgery. Results: At a mean follow-up period of 4.8 years (range, 2–10 years), 31 patients (33 shoulders) experienced significant improvement in the severity of pain at rest, with overhead activities, and during sleep compared to their pre-operative presentation (p < 0.001). The patient experienced less frequent pain during activities and sleep, and a decreased frequency of extreme pain (p < 0.001). Passive range of abduction (p = 0.003), forward flexion (p < 0.001), and supraspinatus strength (p = 0.018) improved compared to the presurgical presentation. Out of 27 patients, 24 patients (89%) had complete resolution of calcific tendonitis, and 26 patients (96%) had an intact rotator cuff. Conclusion: Arthroscopic debridement of calcific tendonitis with localization assistance from a breast biopsy needle under ultrasound guidance was very effective. Patients had significant pain relief, improved range of motion, and a reduction in stiffness at a mean post-operative period of 4.8 years. Patients had a significant reduction in residual calcification, and rotator cuff integrity was largely preserved by long-term follow-up. What is known about this subject: Calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff is one of the most painful and debilitating disorders of the shoulder. This condition is characterized by the deposition of calcium-phosphate crystals within the rotator cuff tendons. Arthroscopic debridement and excision of rotator cuff calcifications have proven to be efficacious treatments with regards to clinical and functional outcomes in the short and medium term. Identifying the calcific lesion intra-operatively, however, can prove to be challenging. Furthermore, inadequate excision of the calcific deposit has been shown to have poorer clinical outcomes. We designed a technique that utilizes the assistance of ultrasound to guide a localization-biopsy wire to the calcific lesion. This technique aids in precisely identifying the location of the lesion intra-operatively to optimize accuracy in removing the maximum amount of calcific deposit possible. A short-term follow-up study by us has demonstrated successful outcomes with regards to the return of function and relief of pain. However, there have been no studies evaluating the effectiveness of this particular technique beyond six months. What this study adds to current knowledge: At a mean of 4.8 years, arthroscopic debridement of calcific tendonitis, using our technique, was successful in relieving the severity and frequency of pain with overhead activities, pain at rest, and pain during sleep, as well as improving range of motion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 491 KiB  
Systematic Review
Safety and Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone in Clinically Node-Positive Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
by Olivia Lovrics, Brendan Tao and Elena Parvez
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(3), 3102-3110; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30030235 - 7 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3018
Abstract
Landmark trials (Z0011 and AMAROS) have demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be safely omitted in patients with breast cancer and 1–2 positive sentinel nodes. Extrapolating from these and other cardinal studies such as NSABP B-04, guidelines state that patients with [...] Read more.
Landmark trials (Z0011 and AMAROS) have demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be safely omitted in patients with breast cancer and 1–2 positive sentinel nodes. Extrapolating from these and other cardinal studies such as NSABP B-04, guidelines state that patients with 1–2 needle biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes undergoing upfront surgery can have sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature to identify studies examining the direct application of SLNB in such patients. EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE were searched from inception to 3 May 2022. Studies including patients with nodal involvement confirmed on pre-operative biopsy and undergoing SLNB were identified. Studies with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Search resulted in 2518 records, of which 68 full-text studies were reviewed, ultimately yielding only 2 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Both studies used targeted axillary surgery (TAS) with pre-operative localization of the biopsy-proven positive node in addition to standard SLNB techniques. In a non-randomized single-center prospective study, Lee et al. report no regional recurrences in patients undergoing TAS or ALND, and no difference in distant recurrence or mortality at 5 years. In the prospective multicenter TAXIS trial by Webber et al., the median number of positive nodes retrieved with TAS in patients undergoing upfront surgery was 2 (1, 4 IQR). Within the subset of patients who underwent subsequent ALND, 61 (70.9%) had additional positive nodes, with 26 (30.2%) patients having ≥4 additional positive nodes. Our review demonstrates that there is limited direct evidence for SLNB alone in clinically node-positive patients undergoing upfront surgery. Available data suggest a high proportion of patients with residual disease in this setting. While the totality of the data, mostly indirect evidence, suggests SLNB alone may be safe, we call on clinicians and researchers to prospectively collect data on this patient population to better inform decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop