Search Results (61)

Background/Objectives: Antibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention strategies. This study aimed to evaluate whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influences the incidence of HAIs in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 278 adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery at a single tertiary care center. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis: one day or more than one day. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, perioperative variables, and infection outcomes were collected. Results: The overall incidence of HAIs was 16.9%, with no significant difference between patients receiving one-day versus extended antibiotic prophylaxis. However, traditional multivariate analysis showed that prophylaxis lasting more than one day was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of HAI (RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12–0.75, p = 0.010) and surgical site infections (RR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.72, p = 0.011). After adjusting for confounders using propensity score matching, this association was no longer statistically significant. No significant association was found between prophylaxis duration and urinary tract infections. Regarding antibiotic selection, first-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly used agents, accounting for 78.8% of prophylactic prescriptions. This was followed by fluoroquinolones (14.4%) and third-generation cephalosporins (5.0%). All patients received metronidazole, a nitroimidazole-class antimicrobial, in combination with the above agents. Conclusions: One day of prophylactic antibiotics may be sufficient in SSI prevention in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The use of extended antibiotic prophylaxis beyond one day should be considered for high-risk patients at high risk of infection, particularly those requiring ICU care. Full article

Infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among liver transplant recipients, despite advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive therapy. This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of targeted perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis against MDR Gram-negative bacteria on postoperative infections and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Seventy-nine adult patients who underwent liver transplantation and were admitted to the ICU for more than 24 h postoperatively were included. Demographics, disease severity scores, comorbidities, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay were recorded. Colonization with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria was assessed via preoperative and postoperative cultures from the blood, urine, rectum, and tracheal secretions. Patients were divided into two groups: those with MDR colonization or infection who received targeted prophylaxis and controls who received standard prophylaxis. Infectious complications (30.4%) occurred significantly less frequently than non-infectious ones (62.0%, p = 0.005). The most common infections were bacteremia (22.7%), pneumonia (17.7%), and surgical site infections (2.5%), with most events occurring within 15 days post-transplant. MDR pathogens isolated included Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although overall complication and mortality rates at 30 days and 3 months did not differ significantly between groups, the targeted prophylaxis group had fewer infectious complications (22.8% vs. 68.5%, p = 0.008), particularly bacteremia (p = 0.007). Infection-related mortality was also significantly reduced in this group (p = 0.039). These findings suggest that identification of MDR colonization and administration of targeted perioperative antibiotics may reduce septic complications in liver transplant patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm benefits on outcomes and resource utilization. Full article

Background/Objectives: Caesarean section (CS) accounts for over 20% of global births and routinely involves perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) to reduce surgical site infections. While the impact of such prophylaxis on neonatal microbiome development is well described, effects on the maternal gut microbiome remain underexplored. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on how antibiotic prophylaxis during CS affects maternal gut microbiome composition and diversity—an underrepresented, but clinically relevant aspect of maternal–fetal medicine. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) through November 2024. Inclusion criteria were defined according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies used molecular techniques to report maternal gut microbiome outcomes (alpha- and beta-diversity). The search concentrated on beta-lactam antibiotics. Reference lists were screened, but no additional grey literature was searched. Synthesis followed the Synthesis Without meta-analysis (SWiM) approach. No review protocol was registered. The review received no external funding. Results: Out of 1011 records, three studies (total 286 mothers) met the inclusion criteria. All reported maternal microbiome outcomes secondarily to infant-focused research. Only one study provided pre- and post-birth stool samples. Applied antibiotic regimens, sequencing methods, and reported microbiome metrics for alpha- and beta-diversity varied considerably, thus limiting comparability of results. Due to high heterogeneity, no formal risk of bias was assessed. While taxonomic diversity changes were inconsistent, significant shifts in functional diversity metrics were observed postpartum. Conclusions: Evidence on maternal microbiome disruption following perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in CS is methodologically fragmented and limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent antibiotic protocols. Nonetheless, functional diversity appears sensitive to antibiotic exposure. To improve clinical understanding and safety, maternal-focused studies using standardized protocols are urgently needed. The maternal microbiome may play a key role in both recovery and shaping the newborn’s early microbial environment. Full article

Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a critical orthopaedic emergency with a high morbidity and mortality prevalence, particularly in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLWHIV). A combination of HIV infection, combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), and compromised bone health further increases the risk of fragility fractures. Additionally, HIV-related immune dysfunction, cART-induced osteoporosis, and perioperative infection risks further pose challenges in ongoing surgical management. Despite the rising global prevalence of PLWHIV, no specific guidelines exist for the perioperative and post-operative care of PLWHIV undergoing NOF fracture surgery. This narrative review synthesises the current literature on the surgical management of NOF fractures in PLWHIV, focusing on pre-operative considerations, intraoperative strategies, post-operative complications, and long-term outcomes. It also explores infection control, fracture healing dynamics, and ART’s impact on surgical outcomes while identifying key research gaps. A systematic database search (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) identified relevant studies published up to February 2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies on incidence, risk factors, ART impact, and NOF fracture outcomes in PLWHIV. Data were analysed to summarise findings and highlight knowledge gaps. Pre-operative care: Optimisation involves assessing immune status (namely, CD4 counts and HIV-1 viral loads), bone health, and cART to minimise surgical risk. Immunodeficiency increases surgical site and periprosthetic infection risks, necessitating potential enhanced antibiotic prophylaxis and close monitoring of potential start/switch/stopping of such therapies. Surgical management of neck of femur (NOF) fractures in PLWHIV should be individualised based on fracture type (intracapsular or extracapsular), age, immune status, bone quality, and functional status. Extracapsular fractures are generally managed with internal fixation using dynamic hip screws or intramedullary nails. For intracapsular fractures, internal fixation may be appropriate for younger patients with good bone quality, though there is an increased risk of non-union in this group. Hemiarthroplasty is typically favoured in older or frailer individuals, offering reduced surgical stress and lower operative time. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered for active patients or those with pre-existing hip joint disease but carries a higher infection risk in immunocompromised individuals. Multidisciplinary evaluation is critical in guiding the most suitable surgical approach for PLWHIV. Importantly, post-operative care carries the risk of higher infection rates, requiring prolonged antibiotic use and wound surveillance. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) contributes to bone demineralisation and chronic inflammation, increasing delayed union healing and non-union risk. HIV-related frailty, neurocognitive impairment, and socioeconomic barriers hinder rehabilitation, affecting recovery. The management of NOF fractures in PLWHIV requires a multidisciplinary, patient-centred approach ideally comprising a team of Orthopaedic surgeon, HIV Physician, Orthogeriatric care, Physiotherapy, Occupational Health, Dietitian, Pharmacist, Psychologist, and related Social Care. Optimising cART, tailoring surgical strategies, and enforcing strict infection control can improve outcomes. Further high-quality studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential to develop evidence-based guidelines. Full article

Background: The misuse of antibiotics in dental practice significantly contributes to the escalation of antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of final-year dental students regarding perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in oral surgery and to identify potential curricular improvements based on the findings. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 117 final-year students at Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry in December 2024. The survey presented clinical scenarios related to common oral surgical procedures, evaluating participants’ antibiotic prescribing behaviors. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics and a One-Sample Chi-Square Test. Results: Students demonstrated a general tendency toward rational antibiotic use in routine clinical scenarios, with statistically significant response patterns favoring the avoidance of unnecessary prescriptions (p < 0.05). However, in complex or borderline cases such as impacted third molar extraction and dental implant placement, response variability was observed. Post hoc analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between closely distributed options, indicating inconsistencies in decision-making in more challenging scenarios. Conclusions: While final-year dental students exhibited a satisfactory level of knowledge regarding appropriate antibiotic use in standard surgical procedures, the variability observed in complex cases underscores the necessity for enhanced educational interventions. Incorporating updated, evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship principles and promoting clinical decision-making through case-based learning are essential to prepare future dental practitioners for responsible antibiotic prescribing, contributing to global efforts to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Full article

This umbrella review synthesizes international guidelines on the surgical management of rectal cancer to provide unified recommendations tailored to local healthcare organizations. This review emphasizes the importance of surgical centralization in high-volume centers, which maximizes outcomes, reduces morbidity, and increases survival rates. Minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery, are highlighted for their perioperative benefits, although careful patient selection and surgical expertise are required. Mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics is recommended to effectively reduce complications, including surgical site infections and anastomotic leakage. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols have been shown to significantly improve postoperative recovery and reduce hospital stay duration. Comprehensive perioperative care, including venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and infection control, is essential for optimal patient outcomes. This review underscores the need for structured training, certification, and regular audits for advanced techniques such as robotic surgery and transanal total mesorectal excision. Implementation of a national database is recommended to support ongoing improvements in rectal cancer surgery. This review centralizes evidence-based recommendations to guide surgical decision-making and harmonize the multidisciplinary care for patients with rectal cancer. Full article

Background and Objectives: Surgical site infections (SSIs) significantly impact pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Considering the increased risk of Gram-negative infections in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS), broader antibiotic coverage could be advantageous. Some studies suggest extending this approach to all scoliosis etiologies to reduce SSI rates. This study evaluates whether a dual antibiotic prophylaxis with cephalosporin and aminoglycoside reduces SSI incidence within 90 days postsurgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), NMS, and syndromic scoliosis (SS) patients. Materials and Methods: This study included pediatric patients with AIS, NMS, or SS curves, treated with posterior spinal fusion between January 2019 and December 2022, with a minimum two-year follow-up. The primary outcome was early SSI incidence and its correlation with dual antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric scoliosis surgery. Secondary outcomes included operative data, blood loss, hemoglobin levels, hospital stay, complications, pelvic fixation, and radiographic correction and how these factors could be identified as potential risk factors for SSIs. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze antibiotic regimen, SSI risk, and perioperative variables using chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA, and Cox regression. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The study included 296 patients: 222 with AIS, 46 with NMS, and 28 with SS. Ninety days postsurgery, SSI rates were 1.2% in AIS (0.8% deep, 0.4% superficial), 6.5% in NMS (all superficial), and 3.5% in SS (all superficial). Deep SSIs in AIS were associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). None of the cases required implant removal. Univariate Cox regression did not reveal any statistically significant predictors for SSIs. However, older age at surgery showed a protective trend, while higher preoperative ASA scores seemed to be a negative prognostic factor (respectively p = 0.051 and p = 0.08). Conclusions: Dual antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin and amikacin was associated with a lower SSI rate after posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis, with no adverse events. Further studies are needed to refine dosage, timing, and duration. Full article

Background and Objectives: The transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy-vestibular approach (TOETVA) and parathyroidectomy-vestibular approach (TOEPVA) are scar-free alternatives to conventional surgery but are classified as clean-contaminated due to the oral incision, raising concerns about surgical site infections (SSIs). This study evaluates whether perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (pABX) alone is sufficient compared to extended antibiotic prophylaxis (eABX) in preventing SSIs in TOET/PVA, particularly considering the surgical learning curve. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 162 patients undergoing TOET/PVA at a single center from January 2018 to June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 82 received eABX (intravenous cefazolin preoperatively plus 7 days of oral amoxicillin/clavulanate), and 80 received pABX alone (intravenous cefazolin). The inclusion criteria included complete postoperative hemogram and C-reactive protein (CRP) records; exclusions comprised other surgical approaches or missing data. Outcomes included postoperative white blood cell (WBC) count, CRP levels, and complications (seroma, cellulitis, and flap perforation), defined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. The statistical analysis comprised t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression, adjusting for confounders like age and sex. Results: The postoperative WBC and CRP levels were significantly higher in the pABX group (p = 0.001), but all values remained within the laboratory normal limits. Complications were observed in 14 patients: seroma in 11, cellulitis in 2, and flap perforation in 1. Complications occurred more frequently in the eABX group but without statistical significance (p = 0.103). The duration of surgery was longer in the eABX group (117.93 ± 52.35 vs. 72.44 ± 22.54 min, p = 0.001) and was an independent predictor of complications (OR = 1.018, 95% CI: 1.006–1.031, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis alone does not increase the risk of SSIs compared to extended prophylaxis in TOETVA. However, eABX may be prudent during the learning curve due to longer operative times and higher complication risks. Future prospective, randomized trials are needed to standardize prophylaxis regimens. Full article

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a veterinary enhanced recovery after surgery (Vet-ERAS) protocol in dogs undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL). The protocol, adapted from human medicine, encompassed a multidisciplinary approach and interventions such as early goal-directed fluid resuscitation, antibiotic prophylaxis, anti-emetic therapy, multimodal analgesia, and early enteral nutrition. A prospective observational study compared outcomes between dogs managed with the Vet-ERAS protocol (n = 59) and historical controls (n = 82). Implementation of the Vet-ERAS protocol resulted in a significant reduction in perioperative complication rates (p = 0.003) and 15-day mortality (5% vs. 20.7%). Intraoperative complications, including tachycardia and hypothermia, were significantly lower in the Vet-ERAS group. Compliance with the protocol improved over time (p = 0.01). These findings suggest that integrating the Vet-ERAS protocol into perioperative management can improve outcomes in dogs undergoing EL. Full article

(1) Background: Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) is controversial. We evaluated the effect of perioperative antibiotic administration on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and bone healing in dogs that underwent TPLO procedures and compared this protocol with cases that received prolonged postoperative antibiotic treatment. (2) Methods: Two different antibiotic treatment protocols were used. In group A, cefazolin (22 mg/kg IV) was administered preoperatively 30–60 min before skin incision and repeated every 90–120 min intraoperatively. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was extended in the postoperative period with oral cefazolin (22 mg/kg BID) for 10 days after surgery. In group B, dogs only received perioperative treatment, at the same dose used in group A. Dogs were considered to have SSI in cases of incisional drainage, wound dehiscence, positive bacterial culture, or evidence of radiographic signs of infection. (3) Results: In group A, SSI was observed in 3/61 TPLOs (4.9%). In group B, SSI was present in 3/51 TPLOs (5.9%). There was no difference between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: Our results indicate that perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in TPLO procedures is sufficient to maintain overall low rates of SSI. The incidence of SSI was similarly low compared to the rate observed in dogs that also received postoperative antibiotic treatment. Full article

Introduction: Data about compliance with perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) guidelines in the pediatric population are limited. This study aims to evaluate PAP adherence in pediatric surgical subspecialty departments. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from September 2023 to October 2024 at “Aghia Sophia” Children’s Hospital, Athens, Greece. Children <16 years old undergoing surgical procedures in the neurosurgery (NS), orthopedics (OP), and otolaryngology (ORL) departments were included. Data on demographics, surgical characteristics, and PAP practices (timing, agent, duration, and redosing) were collected and compliance with the international guidelines was evaluated. Results: A total of 301 children were included, with a median age (IQR) of 7 (8) years. PAP was received by 249/301 (82.7%) children (100% in the OP and NS, and 48% in the ORL). However, indications for PAP had 50.8% of children: 102/103 (99%) in the NS, 47/98 (47.9%) in the OP, and 4/48 (8.3%) in the ORL. Most children received broad-spectrum or combination of antimicrobials and/or antibiotics for longer duration. Appropriate PAP according to the guidelines was administered in 0% children in NS, 2% in OP, and 2.1% in ORL. Multivariable analysis in the ORL regarding the use of PAP revealed that shorter procedures (≤60 min; OR: 22.9, p = 0.003) and clean wounds (OR: 33.4, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with not using PAP. Conclusions: This study highlights gaps in the PAP guideline adherence in pediatric surgical departments, and the need for educational interventions to improve compliance and reduce antimicrobial use. Based on these findings, we plan to implement an educational intervention in order to optimize PAP practices in the pediatric population. Full article

Background/Objectives: A positive intraoperative bile culture (bacterobilia) is considered to be a risk factor for increased morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of our study was to describe the frequency of bacterobilia with a special emphasis on antibiotic resistance and to analyze the association of these findings with postoperative complications, in particular with postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods: From a prospective database, patients with available intraoperative bile cultures (n = 95) were selected and analyzed. Microbiological test results reported the type of bacteria as well as sensitivity and resistance patterns. Associations between culture results, antibiotic resistance, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Results: Among 95 patients that were included in this trial, 71 (74.7%) had a positive bile culture. A total of 29.6% (21/71) of patients with positive bile cultures developed POPF grade B/C compared to 8.3% (2/24) of patients with negative bile cultures (p = 0.052). The difference in CR-POPF became statistically significant when at least one of the isolated microorganisms was resistant to ampicillin/sulbactam, the perioperative antibiotic administered for prophylaxis. CR-POPF was diagnosed in 38.5% (15/39) of patients with antibiotic resistance vs. 14.3% (8/56) of patients without resistant microorganisms (p = 0.007). We also identified the isolation of Enterococcus spp. (p = 0.006), resistant Enterobacter (p = 0.031), or resistant Escherichia coli (p = 0.027) as risk factors for pancreatic fistula. Conclusions: The isolation of antibiotic-resistant strains in a positive bile culture is a major risk factor for the development of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. The most relevant bacteria in our study were Enterococcus spp., Enterobacter cloacae, and Escherichia coli. Thus, broad-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis with efficacy against these microorganisms and with low resistance rates should be routinely administered perioperatively. Full article

Background/Objectives: Surgical site infections are a serious public health concern, representing a significant burden on healthcare systems and society. Their occurrence is influenced by several factors, including patient demographics, healthcare facilities and the specific circumstances surrounding surgery. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in this context carries both potential benefits and risks. The aim of this study is to investigate potential risk factors that may adversely affect the development of SSIs, as well as to assess the appropriateness and adherence to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: This observational study was conducted from October 2023 to October 2024 at the University Hospital of Messina, Italy, a hospital performing both thoracic and vascular surgery. Data were collected using a questionnaire regarding socio-demographic data, risk factors, clinical and surgical data and details regarding the administration of antibiotics. Results: This study included 117 patients with an average age of 63 ± 12.36 SD years, 70.9% from the Thoracic Surgery Unit and 29.1% from the Vascular Surgery Unit. The most administered antibiotic was cefazolin, and antibiotic administration time was in compliance with the guidelines. Conclusions: Our data show that the implementation of evidence-based guidelines, healthcare professionals’ education and correct antibiotic use can reduce the burden of SSIs by improving patient care. Full article

Surgical site infections (SSIs) refer to infections in the incision, organ, or postoperative space. As common healthcare-associated infections, SSIs correlate with prolonged hospital stay, additional procedures, ICU stay, and higher mortality rates. Around 8–10% of gynecologic surgery patients may experience infectious complications, influenced by microbial contamination, surgical nature, and patient factors. The goal of this narrative review is to compare and merge recommendations from globally published guidelines concerning the utilization of antibiotics in the perioperative phase. A comparative descriptive/narrative review of the guidelines issued by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RANZCOG), European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO), Société Française d’ Anésthesie et de Réanimation (SFAR), Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), and Hellenic Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (HSOG) was conducted. For hysterectomy, first/second-generation cephalosporins are suggested, with metronidazole as an option. Laparoscopy without entering the bowel or vagina typically does not require prophylaxis. Uterine evacuation and hysteroscopy may involve doxycycline or azithromycin based on risk factors, whereas, for vulvectomy, cefazolin is recommended. Urogynecology procedures may include cefazolin with metronidazole. In cases of penicillin allergy, cephalosporins are suggested, and, for obese patients, adjusted doses are advised. Additional doses may be needed for prolonged procedures or excessive blood loss. Timing recommendations are 15–60 min before incision, adjusting for specific antibiotics. Clear indications exist for certain surgeries like hysterectomy, termination of pregnancy, and urogynecologic procedures. Conversely, procedures such as intrauterine device insertion, hysteroscopy, and laparoscopy typically do not necessitate antibiotic prophylaxis. For several other procedures, the evidence is inconclusive, while considering dose, timing, and indications can mitigate infectious complications and provide benefits for the healthcare system. Full article

The selection of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is challenging in patients with a history of penicillin allergy; as such, we present a literature review exploring current best practices and the associated supporting evidence, as well as areas for future research. Guidelines recommend the use of alternative agents in patients with an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction, but those alternative agents are associated with worse outcomes, including an increased risk of surgical site infection, and higher cost. More recent data suggest that the risk of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins, particularly cefazolin, is extremely low, and that cefazolin can be used safely in most penicillin-allergic patients. Studies have therefore explored how best to implement first-line cefazolin use in patients with a penicillin allergy label. A variety of interventions, including preoperative allergy de-labeling with incorporation of penicillin skin testing, use of patient risk-stratification questionnaires, and utilization of clinician algorithms to guide antibiotic selection intraoperatively, have all been shown to significantly increase cefazolin utilization without a corresponding increase in adverse events. Further studies are needed to clarify the most effective interventions and implementation strategies, as well as to evaluate whether patients with severe delayed hypersensitivity reactions to penicillin should continue to be excluded from receipt of other beta-lactams. Full article