Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = non-linear incremental dynamic analyses (IDA)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 7886 KB  
Article
Fragility Analysis of RC Frames Accounting for In-Plan Irregularity Using Artificially Introduced Incremental Eccentricity
by Abdelghaffar Messaoudi, Mahmoud Abd-Elwahab, Hossameldeen Mohamed, Rachid Chebili, Hany Madkour, Mohamed Zakaria and Hugo Rodrigues
Buildings 2026, 16(11), 2086; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112086 (registering DOI) - 23 May 2026
Abstract
Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings are the most common structural system in urbanising regions. In many cases, architectural constraints and uneven distribution of structural elements often create eccentricity between the centre of mass (CM) and the centre of rigidity (CR). This eccentricity may induce [...] Read more.
Reinforced concrete (RC) buildings are the most common structural system in urbanising regions. In many cases, architectural constraints and uneven distribution of structural elements often create eccentricity between the centre of mass (CM) and the centre of rigidity (CR). This eccentricity may induce torsional effects during earthquakes that can significantly influence structural response and increase seismic vulnerability. This study investigates the impact of in-plan irregularity on the seismic performance of RC buildings using nonlinear numerical analyses. Three-dimensional models of four- and six-storey RC buildings with moment resisting frames were developed in OpenSees, where different levels of irregularity were introduced by artificially shifting the lumped mass to generate controlled eccentricities without modifying the structural configuration. Seismic performance was evaluated using nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) based on forty ground motion records under bidirectional excitation. The results indicate that increasing CM–CR eccentricity amplifies inter-storey drift demands and elevates the probability of damage due to intensified torsional stresses. The adverse effect is most pronounced when eccentricity aligns with the direction of lower stiffness, whereas eccentricity in the stiffer direction has a limited impact on severe damage states, particularly for taller buildings. These findings provide valuable insights for risk-informed assessment, retrofitting, and prioritisation of existing plan-irregular RC buildings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Innovation in Structural Analysis and Dynamics for Constructions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1818 KB  
Article
Probabilistic Seismic Fragility of Arch Dam Abutments Under Uplift Pressure
by Hosein Izadi, Seyed Alireza Zareei, Niloofar Salemi and Hadi Bahmani
Buildings 2026, 16(3), 567; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16030567 - 29 Jan 2026
Viewed by 450
Abstract
Uplift pressure is a major contributor to seismic instability in arch dam abutments, particularly where jointed rock masses form wedge-shaped failure blocks. This study develops an integrated numerical framework combining nonlinear finite element analysis, the Londe limit-equilibrium method, and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) [...] Read more.
Uplift pressure is a major contributor to seismic instability in arch dam abutments, particularly where jointed rock masses form wedge-shaped failure blocks. This study develops an integrated numerical framework combining nonlinear finite element analysis, the Londe limit-equilibrium method, and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) to quantify the seismic stability of multiple abutment wedges in the Bakhtiari Arch Dam. A three-dimensional finite element model is used to compute dam–abutment thrust forces, while sixteen far-field ground motions are scaled to capture the progression of wedge instability with increasing spectral acceleration. Uplift pressures on joint planes are varied to represent different levels of grout curtain performance. The results indicate that uplift pressure is the dominant factor controlling wedge stability, substantially reducing effective normal stresses and shifting IDA and fragility curves toward lower acceleration demands. Deep wedges (WL4, WL5, WL6 located in the left abutment of the dam) exhibit the highest vulnerability, with instability probabilities exceeding 50% at spectral accelerations as low as 0.34 g under 50% uplift conditions, compared with values greater than 0.65 g for upper wedges. Parametric analyses further show that increasing the joint friction angle significantly enhances seismic resistance, whereas cohesion has a comparatively minor effect. The findings emphasize the necessity of accurate uplift characterization and wedge-specific seismic assessment, and they highlight the crucial role of grout-curtain effectiveness in ensuring the seismic safety of arch dam abutments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Solutions for Enhancing Seismic Resilience of Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 11206 KB  
Article
A Seismic Response and AdaBoost Regressor-Based Vulnerability Analysis of an ±800 kV Suspended Filter Capacitor
by Quan Zhou, Yongheng Mao, Zhongkai Yin, Chang He and Ting Yang
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 3314; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063314 - 18 Mar 2025
Viewed by 962
Abstract
Existing seismic evaluations of electrical equipment in substations mainly focus on post-type equipment, with few studies addressing the suspended equipment that exhibits significant geometric nonlinearity. Most of the vulnerability analyses on substation equipment consider only ground motion uncertainty, not processing other uncertainties including [...] Read more.
Existing seismic evaluations of electrical equipment in substations mainly focus on post-type equipment, with few studies addressing the suspended equipment that exhibits significant geometric nonlinearity. Most of the vulnerability analyses on substation equipment consider only ground motion uncertainty, not processing other uncertainties including material properties. Thus, this paper investigates the seismic responses of an ±800 kV suspended filter capacitor using a simulation model. A new approach for vulnerability assessment based on an adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) regressor is proposed considering the uncertainties of multiple material parameters of the suspension insulators. It is applied to the filter capacitor and validated by conventional incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). In addition, the influence of the pre-tension force of the bottommost suspension insulators is also discussed. The results indicate that increasing the pre-tension force can avoid pressure generation in the insulators and reduce the maximum displacements of the filter capacitor. The failure probability will significantly increase when the pre-tension force increases from 20 kN, although the growth rate continues to fall. The established AdaBoost regressors substantially lower the calculational cost while maintaining an accurate vulnerability prediction, compared to IDA. The proposed method is endorsed due to its high accuracy and low calculation cost, although its feasibility is validated by only one suspended filter capacitor in this paper. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Earthquake Engineering and Seismic Risk)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 9322 KB  
Article
Application and Validation of a Simplified Approach to Evaluate the Seismic Performances of Steel MR-Frames
by Rosario Montuori, Elide Nastri, Vincenzo Piluso, Alessandro Pisapia and Paolo Todisco
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031037 - 25 Jan 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2141
Abstract
The main aim of this work is to validate the application of a simplified performance-based method for assessing the seismic performance of steel buildings, focusing particularly on Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs) through nonlinear analyses. This simplified method defines the capacity curve of a [...] Read more.
The main aim of this work is to validate the application of a simplified performance-based method for assessing the seismic performance of steel buildings, focusing particularly on Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs) through nonlinear analyses. This simplified method defines the capacity curve of a structure through elastic and rigid-plastic analyses, calibrated by regression analyses conducted on 420 structures. To assess its accuracy, the method was compared with other analytical approaches, including incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) provided by existing codes. These analyses were performed on both real structures and simulated designs, considering recent and older codes. The comparison of capacity results derived from code-based approaches and IDA, aligned with the limit states outlined in current codes, showcased the high reliability of the proposed simplified assessment approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Performance-Based Seismic Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 13412 KB  
Article
Seismic Fragility Analysis of a High-Pier Bridge under Pulse-like Ground Motion, Based on a PCA and K-Means Approach
by Jingang Zhao, Hongyu Jia, Can Yang and Bin Du
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(15), 8721; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158721 - 28 Jul 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2516
Abstract
The objective of this study is to present a novel fragility analysis method that combines principal component analysis (PCA) and the K-means clustering algorithm for a probability assessment of seismic damage in high-pier bridges undergoing pulse-like ground motions. Firstly, the method uses the [...] Read more.
The objective of this study is to present a novel fragility analysis method that combines principal component analysis (PCA) and the K-means clustering algorithm for a probability assessment of seismic damage in high-pier bridges undergoing pulse-like ground motions. Firstly, the method uses the correlation coefficient and the condition number as judgment indices to eliminate those seismic intensity measures (IMs) with weak correlation and multicollinearity from all 29 of the initial candidate seismic IMs, the optimal combination of IMs that satisfies the requirements for the PCA method is determined. Secondly, the method utilizes PCA to reduce the dimensionality of the optimal combination of IMs to obtain the principal components, after which the K-means algorithm is applied to classify the original group of selected pulse-like ground motions into four classes. Thirdly, a 3D finite element model of the exemplary high-pier bridge is developed via OpenSees, while incremental nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses are conducted to record the maximum cross-section curvatures of high piers under the influence of various categories of ground motions. Finally, based on the analytical procedures used in the increment dynamic analysis (IDA) method, this study develops and compares the fragility curves for the various classes of pulse-like ground motions. The results indicate the necessity of utilizing the PCA and K-means approach for classifying pulse-like ground motions in the seismic fragility analysis of high-pier bridges. This approach also significantly improves the precision and accuracy of damage probability analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 8776 KB  
Article
Time-Domain Structural Damage and Loss Estimates for Wind Loads: Road to Resilience-Targeted and Smart Buildings Design
by Mihail Iancovici and George Bogdan Nica
Buildings 2023, 13(3), 734; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030734 - 10 Mar 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2799
Abstract
A time-domain wind-induced damage evaluation for the risk- and resilience-targeted design of building structures requires nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) solvers to handle long duration input loads. Moreover, post-construction damage identification based on real-time vibration monitoring depends on accurate damage simulation from the design [...] Read more.
A time-domain wind-induced damage evaluation for the risk- and resilience-targeted design of building structures requires nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) solvers to handle long duration input loads. Moreover, post-construction damage identification based on real-time vibration monitoring depends on accurate damage simulation from the design stage and available artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology. In this paper, an integrated time-domain approach for the performance-based analysis and design for wind is presented. The nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) is performed with the Force Analogy Method (FAM) and the state–space formulation to solve the nonlinear equations of motion. Then, the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is used to perform probabilistic fragility analyses for a typical reinforced concrete (RC) frame structure. The analysis also provides estimates of expected losses, gives the building owners business support data to compare, e.g., the final annual building income (FABI), the cost of repair and the function recovery duration for various wind events in an integrated resilience-based building design framework. This provides the basis for mapping structural damage on large urban scales and for straightforward quantification of wind-induced damage from available response acceleration time-series acquired from real-time vibration monitoring. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 49317 KB  
Article
IMPA versus Cloud Analysis and IDA: Different Methods to Evaluate Structural Seismic Fragility
by Carlotta Pia Contiguglia, Angelo Pelle, Bruno Briseghella and Camillo Nuti
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(7), 3687; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073687 - 6 Apr 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5300
Abstract
Well-known methods for seismic performance assessment, such as incremental dynamic analysis (IDA), multi-stripes analysis (MSA) and the cloud method, involve nonlinear response time-history analyses to characterize the relationship between the chosen damage measure versus intensity measure. Over the past two decades, many authors [...] Read more.
Well-known methods for seismic performance assessment, such as incremental dynamic analysis (IDA), multi-stripes analysis (MSA) and the cloud method, involve nonlinear response time-history analyses to characterize the relationship between the chosen damage measure versus intensity measure. Over the past two decades, many authors have proposed simplified procedures or nonlinear static approaches to develop fragility. In these procedures, the capacity of the system is evaluated by nonlinear static procedures (i.e., the capacity spectrum method (CSM), the N2 method, modal pushover analysis (MPA)) and the demand is derived by response spectra. In addition to the familiar ones, incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA) is a novel nonlinear static procedure proposed in recent years, and it is used in this research to present an IM-based fragility estimation. The accuracy and effectiveness of different methods to assess vulnerability are investigated by comparing fragility curves derived by MPA-based cloud analysis, IMPA and cloud analysis against IDA. The comparison gives valuable insights on the influence of scaling on different sets of records; however, a more extended validation is needed to confirm the obtained results and draw more general conclusions. Results arise from two relatively small bins of record motions differing by ranges of Joyner-Boore distance and scattered in a range of magnitude are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seismic Assessment and Design of Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 7049 KB  
Article
On the Use of Cloud Analysis for Structural Glass Members under Seismic Events
by Silvana Mattei, Marco Fasan and Chiara Bedon
Sustainability 2021, 13(16), 9291; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169291 - 18 Aug 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2739
Abstract
Current standards for seismic-resistant buildings provide recommendations for various structural systems, but no specific provisions are given for structural glass. As such, the seismic design of joints and members could result in improper sizing and non-efficient solutions, or even non-efficient calculation procedures. An [...] Read more.
Current standards for seismic-resistant buildings provide recommendations for various structural systems, but no specific provisions are given for structural glass. As such, the seismic design of joints and members could result in improper sizing and non-efficient solutions, or even non-efficient calculation procedures. An open issue is represented by the lack of reliable and generalized performance limit indicators (or “engineering demand parameters”, EDPs) for glass structures, which represent the basic input for seismic analyses or q-factor estimates. In this paper, special care is given to the q-factor assessment for glass frames under in-plane seismic loads. Major advantage is taken from efficient finite element (FE) numerical simulations to support the local/global analysis of mechanical behaviors. From extensive non-linear dynamic parametric calculations, numerical outcomes are discussed based on three different approaches that are deeply consolidated for ordinary structural systems. Among others, the cloud analysis is characterized by high computational efficiency, but requires the definition of specific EDPs, as well as the choice of reliable input seismic signals. In this regard, a comparative parametric study is carried out with the support of the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) approach for the herein called “dynamic” (M1) and “mixed” (M2) procedures, towards the linear regression of cloud analysis data (M3). Potential and limits of selected calculation methods are hence discussed, with a focus on sample size, computational cost, estimated mechanical phenomena, and predicted q-factor estimates for a case study glass frame. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 9787 KB  
Article
IMPAβ: Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis for Bridges
by Alessandro Vittorio Bergami, Camillo Nuti, Davide Lavorato, Gabriele Fiorentino and Bruno Briseghella
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(12), 4287; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124287 - 22 Jun 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4955
Abstract
In the present study, the incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA), a pushover-based approach already proposed and applied to buildings by the same authors, was revised and proposed for bridges (IMPAβ). Pushover analysis considers the effects of higher modes on the structural response. Bridges [...] Read more.
In the present study, the incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA), a pushover-based approach already proposed and applied to buildings by the same authors, was revised and proposed for bridges (IMPAβ). Pushover analysis considers the effects of higher modes on the structural response. Bridges are structurally very different from multi-story buildings, where multimodal pushover (MPA) has been developed and is currently used. In bridges, consideration for higher modes is often necessary: The responses of some structural elements of the bridge (e.g., piers) influence the overall bridge response. Therefore, the failure of these elements can determine the failure of the whole structure, even if they give a small contribution total base shear. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) requires input accelerograms for high intensities, which are rare in the databases, while scaling of generated accelerograms with a simple increment of the scaling acceleration is not appropriate. This fact renders IDA, which is by its nature time-consuming, not straightforward. On the contrary, the change of input spectrum required by IMPA is simple. IMPAβ also utilizes a simple complementary method coupled to MPA, to obtain bounds at very high seismic intensities. Finally, the two incremental methods based on static nonlinear and dynamic nonlinear analyses are compared. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessing and Extending the Service Life of Bridges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop