Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (19)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1262 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Role of Somatostatin Therapy in Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding
by Magnus Chun, Tahne Vongsavath, Sneh Sonaiya, Lily Liu, Kyaw Min Tun, Kavita Batra and Robert G. Gish
Gastroenterol. Insights 2025, 16(2), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent16020018 - 13 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1200
Abstract
Background and Aims: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common cause of hospitalizations, with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) being the mainstay treatment. However, there is a lack of high-level evidence to show if adjunctive medical therapy (somatostatin and its analogs) can improve [...] Read more.
Background and Aims: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common cause of hospitalizations, with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) being the mainstay treatment. However, there is a lack of high-level evidence to show if adjunctive medical therapy (somatostatin and its analogs) can improve outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the outcomes of PPIs with adjunctive therapy versus PPI monotherapy in treating NVUGIB in an in-patient setting. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, major databases were systematically searched to retrieve English-only, original studies, published from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023, investigating NVUGIB only. The primary outcomes included the mortality rate within 7 days of therapy, rebleeding rate within 7 days of therapy, and length of hospital stay. Results: Seven studies with 789 patients had a pooled mortality rate of 2.0% (95% CI, 0–4.0%), and the pooled risk ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.50–2.48; p = 0.79) between PPI monotherapy and PPIs with adjunctive medical therapy. The pooled rebleeding rate was 13% (95% CI, 6–20%) and the risk ratio was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.73–1.48; p = 0.83). The pooled average length of stay in the hospital was 5.47 days (95% CI, 3.72–7.21 days), with insignificant weighted differences between the two groups. No statistically significant differences were noted in surgical management risk ratios or amount of blood transfusion. Conclusions: Among patients with NVUGIB, adjunctive medical therapy offered no clinical benefits given the statistically insignificant differences in the primary outcomes. However, this conclusion is limited by the considerable variability in treatment protocols, weak control of confounding variables, and missing clinical information in the original studies. Therefore, better-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed, ideally using standardized somatostatin dosing, timing, delivery routes, and clearly defined inclusion criteria to more accurately evaluate the role of somatostatin in NVUGIB management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 1527 KiB  
Case Report
Multidisciplinary Management of Acute Esophageal Necrosis Secondary to Alcoholic Lactic Acidosis: A Case Report
by Luigi Orsini, Alberto Martino, Ornella Picascia, Marco Di Serafino and Giovanni Lombardi
Reports 2025, 8(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8010025 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 541
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN), or black esophagus, is an extraordinary rare source of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Its pathogenesis is still poorly understood, whereas etiology seems to be multifactorial, mainly involving esophageal ischemia, increased acid reflux, and reduced [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN), or black esophagus, is an extraordinary rare source of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Its pathogenesis is still poorly understood, whereas etiology seems to be multifactorial, mainly involving esophageal ischemia, increased acid reflux, and reduced mucosal defenses. Although alcohol abuse has been reported to be a common trigger factor, only one case of AEN due to severe alcoholic lactic acidosis has been described up to date. Case Presentation: Herein, we describe a case of a non-cirrhotic 61-year-old lady with a history of chronic alcohol abuse, who was admitted to the Emergency Room due to upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. AEN caused by severe alcoholic lactic acidosis was promptly diagnosed by subsequent investigations, including blood test, urinalysis, computed tomography, and upper GI endoscopy. The treatment involved a multidisciplinary, aggressive medical approach, which included one hemodialysis session. Conclusions: This is the second documented case of AEN secondary to alcoholic lactic acidosis, successfully treated with a previously unreported aggressive multidisciplinary approach, involving one hemodialysis session. It highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach in managing such complex and rare conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 237 KiB  
Article
Clinical and Biochemical Differences in Patients Having Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding on NSAIDs, Oral Anticoagulants, and Antiplatelet Therapy
by Melania Ardelean, Roxana Buzas, Ovidiu Ardelean, Marius Preda, Stelian Ion Morariu, Codrina Mihaela Levai, Ciprian Ilie Rosca, Daniel Florin Lighezan and Nilima Rajpal Kundnani
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5622; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185622 - 22 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1473
Abstract
Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is among the most common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for major resource allocation and increasing incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the severity of non-variceal bleeding in patients at risk of bleeding through the use [...] Read more.
Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is among the most common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for major resource allocation and increasing incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the severity of non-variceal bleeding in patients at risk of bleeding through the use of NSAIDs, oral anticoagulants, and antiplatelet therapy. Material and Method: The study included 296 patients admitted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Municipal County Emergency University Hospital, Timisoara, between 01.01.2018 and 01.04.2020, and diagnosed via gastroscopy with non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding. The patients were divided among four groups based on their use of different drugs known to induce UGIB, i.e., aspirin and clopidogrel, NOACs, NSAIDs, and anti-vitamin K drugs, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed based on ANOVA one-way tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables with pairwise comparisons based on Bonferroni adjusted significance tests. Results: The results showed several parameters having statistical significance among the different groups of patients. Patients on NOACs had statistically significant lower hemoglobin levels, lower hematocrit values, lower erythrocytes, lower RDW and higher fibrinogen levels compared to patients on VKA. Discussion: Surprisingly, the results from our study suggest that the use of NOACs was associated with a higher risk of bleeding when compared to VKA, which differs from the existing literature. Conclusions: One of the important factors causing upper non-variceal bleeding can be iatrogenic, either due to antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants, to which NSAID treatment is additionally associated for various reasons. In our study, the use of NOACs seemed to have a more severe bleeding spectrum with higher morbidity compared to VKA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
9 pages, 808 KiB  
Article
Platelet Count/Spleen Diameter Ratio as a Non-Invasive Predictor of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhotic Patients: A Single-Center Experience
by Srinith Patil, Swarup Kumar Patnaik, Manjit Kanungo, Kanishka Uthansingh, Jimmy Narayan, Subhasis Pradhan, Debakanta Mishra, Manoj Kumar Sahu and Girish Kumar Pati
Gastroenterol. Insights 2024, 15(1), 98-106; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent15010007 - 26 Jan 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3000
Abstract
(1) Background: The current study examined the correlations between platelet count (PC), spleen diameter (SD), and their ratio to establish a non-invasive technique for predicting the presence of oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. (2) Methods: The current study was an observational study conducted [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The current study examined the correlations between platelet count (PC), spleen diameter (SD), and their ratio to establish a non-invasive technique for predicting the presence of oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. (2) Methods: The current study was an observational study conducted in the Gastroenterology Department at IMS and SUM Hospital from November 2019 to November 2021. Consecutive cirrhotic patients without a history of gastrointestinal bleeding were enrolled in the study, and the esophageal varices were assessed. The patients underwent the necessary tests, including upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, liver function testing, abdominal ultrasonography, and full hemograms. All these parameters were analyzed statistically through SPSS version 23, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. (3) Results: There were significant differences between cases with and without esophageal varices in the following parameters: PC, SD and their ratio, hemoglobin, and ALT level. The PC/SD ratio of ≤ 1400 was associated with a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 80.8%, and a positive predictive value of 82.56% in predicting the presence of oesophageal varices, as per receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis in our study. (4) Conclusions: Esophageal varices can be predicted non-invasively using the platelet count, spleen diameter, and PC/SD ratio. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Liver)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2950 KiB  
Systematic Review
Esophageal Stent in Acute Refractory Variceal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
by Busara Songtanin, Chanaka Kahathuduwa and Kenneth Nugent
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 357; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020357 - 9 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3194
Abstract
Background: Acute esophageal variceal bleeding accounts for up to 70% of upper-gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. About 10–20% of patients with acute variceal bleeding have refractory bleeding that is not controlled by medical or endoscopic therapy, and this condition can be life-threatening. Balloon [...] Read more.
Background: Acute esophageal variceal bleeding accounts for up to 70% of upper-gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. About 10–20% of patients with acute variceal bleeding have refractory bleeding that is not controlled by medical or endoscopic therapy, and this condition can be life-threatening. Balloon tamponade is a long-standing therapy which is only effective temporarily and has several complications, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and liver transplantation may not be readily available at some centers. The use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) in refractory esophageal variceal bleeding has been studied for effectiveness and adverse events and has been recommended for use as a bridge to a more definitive treatment. Aim: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of SEMSs in managing refractory variceal bleeding. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases was performed from inception to October 2022 using the following terms: “esophageal stent”, “self-expandable metal stents”, “endoscopic hemostasis”, “refractory esophageal varices”, and “esophageal variceal bleeding”. Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they met the following criteria: (1) patients’ age older than 18 and (2) a study (or case series) that has at least 10 patients in the study. Exclusion criteria included (1) non-English publications, (2) in case of overlapping cohorts, data from the most recent and/or most appropriate comprehensive report were collected. DerSimonian–Laird random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the meta package in R statistical software(version 4.2.2). Results: Twelve studies involving 225 patients with 228 stents were included in the analyses. The mean age and/or median age ranged from 49.4 to 69 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 4.4 to 1. The median follow-up period was 42 days. The mean SEMS dwell time was 9.4 days. The most common cause of acute refractory variceal bleeding in chronic liver disease patients included alcohol use followed by viral hepatitis. The pooled rate of immediate bleeding control was 91% (95% CI 82–95%, I2 = 0). The pooled rate of rebleeding was 17% (95% CI 8–32%, I2 = 69). The pooled rate of stent ulceration was 7% (95% CI 3–13%, I2 = 0), and the pooled rate of stent migration was 18% (95% CI 9–32%, I2 = 38). The pooled rate of all-cause mortality was 38% (95% CI 30–47%, I2 = 34). Conclusions: SEMSs should be primarily considered as salvage therapy when endoscopic band ligation and sclerotherapy fail and can be used as a bridge to emergent TIPS or definitive therapy, such as liver transplantation. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 532 KiB  
Article
Recurrent Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding among Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy
by Ah Young Yoo, Moon Kyung Joo, Jong-Jae Park, Beom Jae Lee, Seung Han Kim, Won Shik Kim and Hoon Jai Chun
Diagnostics 2023, 13(22), 3444; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13223444 - 14 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1788
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may experience recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We investigated the clinical characteristics and risk factors for recurrent non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in patients who had experienced NVUGIB while receiving DAPT. Methods: We enrolled patients diagnosed with [...] Read more.
Background: Patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may experience recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We investigated the clinical characteristics and risk factors for recurrent non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in patients who had experienced NVUGIB while receiving DAPT. Methods: We enrolled patients diagnosed with NVUGIB while receiving DAPT between 2006 and 2020. Definite bleeding was confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy in all NVUGIB patients. Results: A total of 124 patients were diagnosed with NVUGIB while receiving DAPT. They were predominantly male (n = 103, 83.1%), bleeding mostly from the stomach (n = 94, 75.8%) and had peptic ulcers (n = 72, 58.1%). After the successful hemostasis of NVUGIB, 36 patients (29.0%) experienced at least one episode of recurrent upper GIB, 19 patients (15.3%) died, and 7 (5.6%) patients had a bleeding-related death. Multivariate analysis showed that age was a significant factor for re-bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 1.050; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001–1.102; p-value: 0.047), all-cause mortality (OR, 1.096; 95% CI: 1.020–1.178, p = 0.013), and re-bleeding-related mortality (OR, 1.187; 95% CI: 1.032–1.364, p-value: 0.016). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, the cumulative probabilities of re-bleeding, death, and bleeding-related death were significantly higher in patients aged 70 and older (p = 0.008, <0.001, and 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: Clinicians should be cautious about re-bleeding and mortality in elderly patients who experience NVUGIB while receiving DAPT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 862 KiB  
Review
Endoscopic Management of Bleeding in Altered Anatomy after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery
by Giulia Gibiino, Cecilia Binda, Matteo Secco, Paolo Giuffrida, Chiara Coluccio, Barbara Perini, Stefano Fabbri, Elisa Liverani, Carlo Felix Maria Jung and Carlo Fabbri
Medicina 2023, 59(11), 1941; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111941 - 2 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2695
Abstract
Postoperative non variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage may occur early or late and affect a variable percentage of patients—up to about 2%. Most cases of intraluminal bleeding are an indication for urgent Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and require endoscopic haemostatic treatment. In addition to the approach [...] Read more.
Postoperative non variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage may occur early or late and affect a variable percentage of patients—up to about 2%. Most cases of intraluminal bleeding are an indication for urgent Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and require endoscopic haemostatic treatment. In addition to the approach usually adopted in non-variceal upper haemorrhages, these cases may be burdened with difficulties in terms of anastomotic tissue, angled positions, and the risk of further complications. There is also extreme variability related to the type of surgery performed, in the context of oncological disease or bariatric surgery. At the same time, the world of haemostatic devices available in digestive endoscopy is increasing, meeting high efficacy rates and attempting to treat even the most complex cases. Our narrative review summarises the current evidence in terms of different approaches to endoscopic haemostasis in upper bleeding in altered anatomy after surgery, proposing an up-to-date guidance for endoscopic clinicians and at the same time, highlighting areas of future scientific research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Interventions in Gastric Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1888 KiB  
Article
The Importance of Arterial Blood Flow Detection for Risk Stratification and Eradication to Achieve Definitive Hemostasis of Severe Non-Variceal UGI Hemorrhage
by Dennis M. Jensen
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(20), 6473; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206473 - 11 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2705
Abstract
Background: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common medical problem worldwide. Independent endoscopic risk factors for rebleeding and mortality of NVUGIB that are treatable are stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) and arterial blood flow underneath SRH. The specific aims of this paper [...] Read more.
Background: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common medical problem worldwide. Independent endoscopic risk factors for rebleeding and mortality of NVUGIB that are treatable are stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) and arterial blood flow underneath SRH. The specific aims of this paper are to describe the importance of arterial blood flow detection for risk stratification and as a guide to definitive hemostasis of severe NVUGIB. Methods: This is a review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort study methodologies and results which utilized a Doppler endoscopic probe (DEP) for the detection of arterial blood underneath SRH, for risk stratification, and as a guide to definitive hemostasis. The results are compared to visually guided hemostasis based upon SRH. Results: Although SRH have been utilized to guide endoscopic hemostasis of NVUGIB for 50 years, when most visually guided treatments are applied to lesions with major SRH, arterial blood flow underneath SRH is not obliterated in 25–30% of patients and results in rebleeding. Definitive hemostasis, significantly lower rebleeding rates, and improvements in other clinical outcomes resulted when DEP was used for risk stratification and as a guide to obliteration of arterial blood flow underneath SRH. Conclusions: DEP-guided endoscopic hemostasis is a very effective and safe new method to improve patient outcomes for NVUGIB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 579 KiB  
Article
Intermittent Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Low-Risk Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding May Be Significantly Cost-Saving
by Yang Lei, Jennifer Halasz, Kerri L. Novak and Stephen E. Congly
Medicines 2023, 10(7), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines10070044 - 20 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3763
Abstract
Background: High-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, given either intermittently or continuously for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NV-UGIB), is efficacious. Using intermittent PPI for low-risk patients may be cost-saving. Our objective was to estimate the annual cost savings if all low-risk NV-UGIB patients [...] Read more.
Background: High-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, given either intermittently or continuously for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NV-UGIB), is efficacious. Using intermittent PPI for low-risk patients may be cost-saving. Our objective was to estimate the annual cost savings if all low-risk NV-UGIB patients received intermittent PPI therapy. Methods: Patients who presented to hospital in Calgary, Alberta, who received a PPI for NV-UGIB from July 2015 to March 2017 were identified using ICD-10 codes. Patients were stratified into no endoscopy, high-risk, and low-risk lesion groups and further subdivided into no PPI, oral PPI, intermittent intravenous (IV), and continuous IV subgroups. Average length of stay (LOS) in each subgroup and costs were calculated. Results: We identified 4141 patients with NV-UGIBs, (median age 61, 57.4% male). One-thousand two-hundred and thirty-one low-risk patients received continuous IV PPI, with an average LOS of 6.8 days (95% CI 6.2–7.3) versus 4.9 days (95% CI 3.9–5.9) for intermittent IV patients. If continuous IV PPI patients instead received intermittent IV PPI, 3852 patient days and CAD 11,714,390 (2017 CAD)/year could be saved. Conclusions: Using real-world administrative data, we demonstrate that a sizable portion of low-risk patients with NV-UGIB who were given continuous IV PPI if switched to intermittent IV therapy could generate significant potential cost savings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 812 KiB  
Review
A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
by Josh Orpen-Palmer and Adrian J. Stanley
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(11), 3678; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113678 - 26 May 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 8242
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. Thorough initial assessment and appropriate resuscitation are essential to stabilise the patient. Risk scores provide an important tool to discriminate between lower- and higher-risk patients. Very low-risk patients can be safely discharged for out-patient management, [...] Read more.
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. Thorough initial assessment and appropriate resuscitation are essential to stabilise the patient. Risk scores provide an important tool to discriminate between lower- and higher-risk patients. Very low-risk patients can be safely discharged for out-patient management, while higher-risk patients can receive appropriate in-patient care. The Glasgow Blatchford Score, with a score of 0–1, performs best in the identification of very low-risk patients who will not require hospital based intervention or die, and is recommended by most guidelines to facilitate safe out-patient management. The performance of risk scores in the identification of specific adverse events to define high-risk patients is less accurate, with no individual score performing consistently well. Ongoing developments in the use of machine learning models and artificial intelligence in predicting poor outcomes in UGIB appear promising and will likely form the basis of dynamic risk assessment in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 453 KiB  
Article
Are Short-Stay Units Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
by Marcello Candelli, Maria Lumare, Maria Elena Riccioni, Antonio Mestice, Veronica Ojetti, Giulia Pignataro, Giuseppe Merra, Andrea Piccioni, Maurizio Gabrielli, Antonio Gasbarrini and Francesco Franceschi
Medicina 2023, 59(6), 1021; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061021 - 25 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1972
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a health, political, and economic problem of concern worldwide. The causes of overcrowding are an aging population, an increase in chronic diseases, a lack of access to primary care, and a lack of resources in communities. [...] Read more.
Introduction: Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a health, political, and economic problem of concern worldwide. The causes of overcrowding are an aging population, an increase in chronic diseases, a lack of access to primary care, and a lack of resources in communities. Overcrowding has been associated with an increased risk of mortality. The establishment of a Short Stay Unit (SSU) for conditions that cannot be treated at home but require treatment and hospitalization for up to 72 h may be a solution. SSU can significantly reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) for certain conditions but does not appear to be useful for other diseases. Currently, there are no studies addressing the efficacy of SSU in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of SSU in reducing the need for hospitalization, LOS, hospital readmission, and mortality in patients with NVUGIB compared with admission to the regular ward. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. Medical records of patients presenting with NVUGIB to ED between 1 April 2021, and 30 September 2022, were analyzed. We included patients aged >18 years who presented to ED with acute upper gastrointestinal tract blood loss. The test population was divided into two groups: Patients admitted to a normal inpatient ward (control) and patients treated at SSU (intervention). Clinical and medical history data were collected for both groups. The hospital LOS was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were time to endoscopy, number of blood units transfused, readmission to the hospital at 30 days, and in-hospital mortality. Results: The analysis included 120 patients with a mean age of 70 years, 54% of whom were men. Sixty patients were admitted to SSU. Patients admitted to the medical ward had a higher mean age. The Glasgow-Blatchford score, used to assess bleeding risk, mortality, and hospital readmission were similar in the study groups. Multivariate analysis after adjustment for confounders found that the only factor independently associated with shorter LOS was admission to SSU (p < 0.0001). Admission to SSU was also independently and significantly associated with a shorter time to endoscopy (p < 0.001). The only other factor associated with a shorter time to EGDS was creatinine level (p = 0.05), while home treatment with PPI was associated with a longer time to endoscopy. LOS, time to endoscopy, number of patients requiring transfusion, and number of units of blood transfused were significantly lower in patients admitted to SSU than in the control group. Conclusions: The results of the study show that treatment of NVUGIB in SSU can significantly reduce the time required for endoscopy, the hospital LOS, and the number of transfused blood units without increasing mortality and hospital readmission. Treatment of NVUGIB at SSU may therefore help to reduce ED overcrowding but multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these data Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 877 KiB  
Article
The Accuracy of Pre-Endoscopic Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Upper GI Bleeding and No Endoscopy Performed
by Sergiu Marian Cazacu, Dragoș Ovidiu Alexandru, Răzvan-Cristian Statie, Sevastița Iordache, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu, Vlad Florin Iovănescu, Petrică Popa, Victor Mihai Sacerdoțianu, Carmen Daniela Neagoe and Mirela Marinela Florescu
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1188; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061188 - 21 Mar 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3368
Abstract
(1) Background: The assessment of mortality and rebleeding rate in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is essential, and several prognostic scores have been proposed. Some patients with UGIB did not undergo endoscopy, either because they refused the procedure, suffered from alcohol withdrawal symptoms or [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The assessment of mortality and rebleeding rate in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is essential, and several prognostic scores have been proposed. Some patients with UGIB did not undergo endoscopy, either because they refused the procedure, suffered from alcohol withdrawal symptoms or altered general status, or because the bleeding was severe enough to cause death before the endoscopy. The mortality risk in the subgroup of patients without endoscopy is poorly evaluated in the literature. (2) Methods: The purpose of the study was to identify the most useful scores for the assessment of in-hospital mortality in patients with UGIB with no endoscopy performed and no known etiology. A total of 198 patients with UGIB and no endoscopy performed were admitted between January 2017 and December 2021 and the accuracy of 12 prognostic scores and the Charlson comorbidity index for in-hospital mortality prediction were analyzed, as well as Child–Pugh Turcotte (CPT) and Meld scores in patients with cirrhosis. (3) Results: The mortality rate was 37.9%, higher than in variceal (21.9%, p < 0.0001) and non-variceal bleeding (7.4%, p < 0.0001). The most accurate scores by AUC were the International Bleeding score (INBS, 0.844), Glasgow Blatchford (0.783), MAP score (0.78), Iino (0.766), AIM65 and modified N-score (0.745 each), modified Glasgow-Blatchford (0.73), H3B2 and N-score (0.701); Rockall, Baylor, and T-score had an AUC below 0.7. MELD score was superior to CPT in patients with cirrhosis (AUC 0.811 versus 0.670). (4) Conclusions: The mortality rate in UGIB with no endoscopy was higher than in both variceal and non-variceal bleeding and was higher in the pandemic period but with no statistical significance (45.3% versus 32.14%, p = 0.0586), mainly because of positive cases. Only one case of rebleeding was noted; the hospitalization period was significantly shorter. The most accurate score was International Bleeding Score; the MELD score had a higher but moderate accuracy compared with CPT in patients with cirrhosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1182 KiB  
Review
Hemostatic Powders in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: The Open Questions
by Omero Alessandro Paoluzi, Edoardo Troncone, Elena De Cristofaro, Mezia Sibilia, Giovanni Monteleone and Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco
Medicina 2023, 59(1), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010143 - 11 Jan 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5214
Abstract
Hemostatic powder (HP) is a relatively recent addition to the arsenal of hemostatic endoscopic procedures (HEPs) for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to benign and malignant lesions. Five types of HP are currently available: TC-325 (Hemospray™), EndoClot™, Ankaferd Blood Stopper®, and, more [...] Read more.
Hemostatic powder (HP) is a relatively recent addition to the arsenal of hemostatic endoscopic procedures (HEPs) for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to benign and malignant lesions. Five types of HP are currently available: TC-325 (Hemospray™), EndoClot™, Ankaferd Blood Stopper®, and, more recently, UI-EWD (NexpowderTM) and CEGP-003 (CGBio™). HP acts as a mechanical barrier and/or promotes platelet activation and coagulation cascade. HP may be used in combination with or as rescue therapy in case of failure of conventional HEPs (CHEPs) and also as monotherapy in large, poorly accessible lesions with multiple bleeding sources. Although the literature on HP is abundant, randomized controlled trials are scant, and some questions remain open. While HP is highly effective in inducing immediate hemostasis in GIB, the rates of rebleeding reported in different studies are very variable, and conditions affecting the stability of hemostasis have not yet been fully elucidated. It is not established whether HP as monotherapy is appropriate in severe GIB, such as spurting peptic ulcers, or should be used only as rescue or adjunctive therapy. Finally, as it can be sprayed on large areas, HP could become the gold standard in malignancy-related GIB, which is often nonresponsive or not amenable to treatment with CHEPs as a result of multiple bleeding points and friable surfaces. This is a narrative review that provides an overview of currently available data and the open questions regarding the use of HP in the management of non-variceal upper GIB due to benign and malignant diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digestive Endoscopy: Inside the Evidence and Outside)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 748 KiB  
Article
Child-Pugh Score, MELD Score and Glasgow Blatchford Score to Predict the In-Hospital Outcome of Portal Hypertensive Patients Presenting with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Experience from Tertiary Healthcare System
by Zubia Jamil, Shahida Perveen, Samreen Khalid, Mohammed Aljuaid, Memoona Shahzad, Bashir Ahmad and Yasir Waheed
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(22), 6654; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226654 - 9 Nov 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3264
Abstract
The two most familiar scores used for prognostication of liver cirrhosis are the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), while the Glasgow-Blatchford (GB) score is used for sorting non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage into high- or low-risk categories. This study evaluates [...] Read more.
The two most familiar scores used for prognostication of liver cirrhosis are the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), while the Glasgow-Blatchford (GB) score is used for sorting non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage into high- or low-risk categories. This study evaluates the validity of the CTP, MELD, and GB scoring systems in prognosticating the in-hospital outcome of bleeding portal hypertensive patients. In this study, the ROC curve and Younden index determine the efficacy of three scoring systems. The results indicate that CTP was the most efficient score as the predictor of outcome (AUC = 0.9, cut-off value > 7); followed by MELD (AUC = 0.8, cut-off value > 18) and then the GB score (AUC = 0.64, cut-off value > 14) (p < 0.05). In pair-wise comparison, the difference between CTP and MELD was insignificant (p > 0.05). Patients with a CTP score of >7 had notably higher in-hospital mortality (19.8% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.0001). Similarly, mortality with a MELD score > 18 was significant (14.8% vs. 5.9% (p < 0.0001). The GB score was not a good indicator of the outcome. Platelets, albumin, CTP, and MELD scores were the independent contributors to mortality. Thus, as liver cirrhosis prognosticators, CTP and MELD scores can also both be used as predictive scores of the in-hospital outcomes of bleeding patients due to portal hypertension. Compared to the GB score, CTP and MELD scores are fairly efficient predictors in these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2258 KiB  
Article
Prediction of Adverse Events in Stable Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Machine Learning
by Dong-Woo Seo, Hahn Yi, Beomhee Park, Youn-Jung Kim, Dae Ho Jung, Ilsang Woo, Chang Hwan Sohn, Byuk Sung Ko, Namkug Kim and Won Young Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2603; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082603 - 11 Aug 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 2938
Abstract
Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML). Using prospective [...] Read more.
Clinical risk-scoring systems are important for identifying patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who are at a high risk of hemodynamic instability. We developed an algorithm that predicts adverse events in patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB using machine learning (ML). Using prospective observational registry, 1439 out of 3363 consecutive patients were enrolled. Primary outcomes included adverse events such as mortality, hypotension, and rebleeding within 7 days. Four machine learning algorithms, namely, logistic regression with regularization (LR), random forest classifier (RF), gradient boosting classifier (GB), and voting classifier (VC), were compared with the Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) and Rockall scores. The RF model showed the highest accuracies and significant improvement over conventional methods for predicting mortality (area under the curve: RF 0.917 vs. GBS 0.710), but the performance of the VC model was best in hypotension (VC 0.757 vs. GBS 0.668) and rebleeding within 7 days (VC 0.733 vs. GBS 0.694). Clinically significant variables including blood urea nitrogen, albumin, hemoglobin, platelet, prothrombin time, age, and lactate were identified by the global feature importance analysis. These results suggest that ML models will be useful early predictive tools for identifying high-risk patients with initially stable non-variceal UGIB admitted at an emergency department. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI in Medical Practice/Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop