Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = jus post bellum

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 274 KiB  
Article
Post-Intervention Reconstruction and the Responsibility to Rebuild
by Athanasios Stathopoulos
Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(8), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080368 - 17 Aug 2022
Viewed by 3553
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between the responsibility to rebuild and post-intervention reconstruction. It aims to determine whether the current interpretation of the responsibility to rebuild is the appropriate framework for attaining the goals of post-intervention reconstruction. The article argues that, despite the [...] Read more.
This article examines the relationship between the responsibility to rebuild and post-intervention reconstruction. It aims to determine whether the current interpretation of the responsibility to rebuild is the appropriate framework for attaining the goals of post-intervention reconstruction. The article argues that, despite the urgent need for a post-intervention strategy in the aftermath of humanitarian interventions, the responsibility to rebuild, as it is currently being framed, can end up undermining the goals of post-conflict reconstruction by dissuading states from participating in atrocity prevention, inadvertently increasing atrocity crimes and delegitimizing military humanitarian interventions. The analysis identifies the need for the responsibility to rebuild to incorporate an increased respect for post bellum proportionality and self-determination. Full article
21 pages, 1044 KiB  
Article
Attaining Post-Conflict Peace Using the jus post bellum Concept
by Albert W. Klein
Religions 2020, 11(4), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11040173 - 8 Apr 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4908
Abstract
To attain peace after state-on-state war, there must be a belligerent occupation to establish control and security of a defeated state—but that is not enough. There is the concept of jus post bellum concerning the vanquished, which is critically necessary in practice, yet [...] Read more.
To attain peace after state-on-state war, there must be a belligerent occupation to establish control and security of a defeated state—but that is not enough. There is the concept of jus post bellum concerning the vanquished, which is critically necessary in practice, yet insufficiently developed and understood. Providing the history and tentatively trying to determine the elements that are contained in this concept are the present article’s purpose. Tracing the concept from the earliest Christian writers to the more secular present-day authors will aid in the prospective application of jus post bellum. Scholars, military officers, statesmen, religious leaders, and humanitarians need to understand and accept the basic elements of the concept. A clear understanding of the largely religious history behind these elements should assist in their acceptance and future practical application, once these are agreed upon. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion’s Role in Contemporary Public Policy Controversies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop