Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = falling and level sonority

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
32 pages, 1985 KB  
Article
Cluster Development and the Veiled Rise in Sonority
by Elena Babatsouli and Eleftheria Geronikou
Languages 2025, 10(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10020031 - 12 Feb 2025
Viewed by 8037
Abstract
Children’s consonant cluster productions in typical and atypical phonological development were investigated for different languages reporting developmental productions that are universal, language-specific, and/or child-specific. These patterns are often interpreted considering sonority hierarchy effects. Quantitative norms on developmental cluster productions are less prevalent in [...] Read more.
Children’s consonant cluster productions in typical and atypical phonological development were investigated for different languages reporting developmental productions that are universal, language-specific, and/or child-specific. These patterns are often interpreted considering sonority hierarchy effects. Quantitative norms on developmental cluster productions are less prevalent in the literature cross-linguistically, as are investigations on the development of less frequent cluster types in the world’s languages, like those involving falling and level sonority two-member onsets. Our study contributes to these investigations, focusing on Greek-specific onsets: falling sonority obstruents [ft, xt], level sonority obstruents [fθ, fç, ðʝ, xθ, ɣð], and level sonority nasals [mɲ]. We present cross-sectional, longitudinal data from 90 monolingual children, aged 2;0–4;0, based on the word elicitation task, Phonological Assessment for Greek (PAel). As only [ft] 89%, [fç] 80%, [mɲ] 88% are acquired by 3;6–4;0, the data provide evidence that [ft, xt, fθ, xθ, ɣð] reduce to C2, [mɲ] reduces to C1, and [fç], [ðʝ] show the most variability in reduction/simplification patterns. Reduction patterns largely reflect individual cluster acquisition paths longitudinally; the relative reduction to a member changes with age, but the preference to the member does not, except for [ðʝ]. The data facilitate the establishment of quantitative markers for cluster development and qualitative interpretations in terms of featural and structural prominence, including a veiled sonority effect not previously reported in the literature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Facets of Greek Language)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop