Search Results (37)

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by memory loss and cognitive decline. In addition to its two major pathological hallmarks, extracellular amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), recent evidence highlights the critical roles of mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in disease progression. Aβ impairs mitochondrial function, which, in part, can subsequently trigger inflammatory cascades, creating a vicious cycle of neuronal damage. Estrogen receptors (ERs) are widely expressed throughout the brain, and the sex hormone 17β-estradiol (E2) exerts neuroprotection through both anti-inflammatory and mitochondrial mechanisms. While E2 exhibits neuroprotective properties, its mechanisms against Aβ toxicity remain incompletely understood. In this study, we investigated the neuroprotective effects of E2 against Aβ-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in primary cortical neurons, with a particular focus on the role of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). We found that E2 treatment significantly increased phosphorylated AMPK and upregulated the expression of mitochondrial biogenesis regulator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 α (PGC-1α), leading to improved mitochondrial respiration. In contrast, Aβ suppressed AMPK and PGC-1α signaling, impaired mitochondrial function, activated the pro-inflammatory nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), and reduced neuronal viability. E2 pretreatment also rescued Aβ-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, suppressed NF-κB activation, and, importantly, prevented the decline in neuronal viability. However, the pharmacological inhibition of AMPK using Compound C (CC) abolished these protective effects, resulting in mitochondrial collapse, elevated inflammation, and cell death, highlighting AMPK’s critical role in mediating E2’s actions. Interestingly, while NF-κB inhibition using BAY 11-7082 partially restored mitochondrial respiration, it failed to prevent Aβ-induced cytotoxicity, suggesting that E2’s full neuroprotective effects rely on broader AMPK-dependent mechanisms beyond NF-κB suppression alone. Together, these findings establish AMPK as a key mediator of E2’s protective effects against Aβ-driven mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation, providing new insights into estrogen-based therapeutic strategies for AD. Full article

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by the formation of neurotoxic beta-amyloid (Aβ) oligomers in the central nervous system. One of the earliest pathological effects of Aβ is the induction of oxidative stress in brain tissue, mediated by NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2). This study aimed to determine whether short-term inhibition of NOX2 could disrupt the pathological cascade and prevent the development of Aβ-induced pathology. We demonstrated that suppressing NOX2 activity by GSK2795039 during the first three days after intracerebral Aβ administration prevented the development of the pathological process in mice. Two weeks after the induction of Aβ pathology, animals treated with GSK2795039 showed no neuropsychiatric-like behavioral changes, which correlated with the absence of chronic oxidative damage in brain tissue. Moreover, GSK2795039 prevented microglial activation and reduced microglia-associated neuroinflammation. These findings indicate that short-term NOX2 inhibition effectively suppresses the development of Aβ-induced pathology, suggesting that NOX2 is a potential target for treatment and prevention of AD pathology. Full article

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), such as tau, beta-amyloid (Aβ), and alpha-synuclein (αSyn), are prone to misfolding, resulting in pathological aggregation and propagation that drive neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Misfolded IDPs are prone to aggregate into oligomers and fibrils, exacerbating disease progression by disrupting cellular functions in the central nervous system, triggering neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Furthermore, aggregated IDPs exhibit prion-like behavior, acting as seeds that are released into the extracellular space, taken up by neighboring cells, and have a propagating pathology across different regions of the brain. Conventional inhibitors, such as small molecules, peptides, and antibodies, face challenges in stability and blood–brain barrier penetration, limiting their efficacy. In recent years, nanotechnology-based strategies, such as multifunctional nanoplatforms or nanoparticles, have emerged as promising tools to address these challenges. These nanoplatforms leverage tailored designs to prevent or remodel the aggregation of IDPs and reduce associated neurotoxicity. This review discusses recent advances in nanoplatforms designed to target tau, Aβ, and αSyn aggregation, with a focus on their roles in reducing neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. We examine critical aspects of nanoplatform design, including the choice of material backbone and targeting moieties, which influence interactions with IDPs. We also highlight key mechanisms including the interaction between nanoplatforms and IDPs to inhibit their aggregation, redirect aggregation cascade towards nontoxic, off-pathway species, and disrupt fibrillar structures into soluble forms. We further outline future directions for enhancing IDP clearance, achieving spatiotemporal control, and improving cell-specific targeting. These nanomedicine strategies offer compelling paths forward for developing more effective and targeted therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Full article

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder predominantly affecting the elderly, characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and functional impairment. While hallmark pathological features include extracellular amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau protein, increasing evidence points to chronic neuroinflammation as a key driver of disease progression. Among inflammatory mechanisms, the activation of the NLRP3 (nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome in microglia plays a pivotal role by amplifying neuroinflammatory cascades, exacerbating synaptic dysfunction, and accelerating neuronal loss. This review examines the molecular underpinnings of AD with a focus on NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation, detailing the crosstalk between Aβ, tau pathology, and innate immune responses. Finally, we highlight emerging therapeutic strategies targeting NLRP3 inflammasome activation as promising avenues for mitigating neuroinflammation and slowing AD progression. Full article

The present Perspective analyzes the remarkable evolution of the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis 2.0 (ACH2.0) theory of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) since its inception a few years ago, as reflected in the diminishing role of amyloid-beta (Aβ) in the disease. In the initial iteration of the ACH2.0, Aβ-protein-precursor (AβPP)-derived intraneuronal Aβ (iAβ), accumulated to neuronal integrated stress response (ISR)-eliciting levels, triggers AD. The neuronal ISR, in turn, activates the AβPP-independent production of its C99 fragment that is processed into iAβ, which drives the disease. The second iteration of the ACH2.0 stemmed from the realization that AD is, in fact, a disease of the sustained neuronal ISR. It introduced two categories of AD—conventional and unconventional—differing mainly in the manner of their causation. The former is caused by the neuronal ISR triggered by AβPP-derived iAβ, whereas in the latter, the neuronal ISR is elicited by stressors distinct from AβPP-derived iAβ and arising from brain trauma, viral and bacterial infections, and various types of inflammation. Moreover, conventional AD always contains an unconventional component, and in both forms, the disease is driven by iAβ generated independently of AβPP. In its third, the current, iteration, the ACH2.0 posits that proteolytic production of Aβ is suppressed in AD-affected neurons and that the disease is driven by C99 generated independently of AβPP. Suppression of Aβ production in AD seems an oxymoron: Aβ is equated with AD, and the later is inconceivable without the former in an ingrained Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (ACH)-based notion. But suppression of Aβ production in AD-affected neurons is where the logic leads, and to follow it we only need to overcome the inertia of the preexisting assumptions. Moreover, not only is the generation of Aβ suppressed, so is the production of all components of the AβPP proteolytic pathway. This assertion is not a quantum leap (unless overcoming the inertia counts as such): the global cellular protein synthesis is severely suppressed under the neuronal ISR conditions, and there is no reason for constituents of the AβPP proteolytic pathway to be exempted, and they, apparently, are not, as indicated by the empirical data. In contrast, tau protein translation persists in AD-affected neurons under ISR conditions because the human tau mRNA contains an internal ribosomal entry site in its 5′UTR. In current mouse models, iAβ derived from AβPP expressed exogenously from human transgenes elicits the neuronal ISR and thus suppresses its own production. Its levels cannot principally reach AD pathology-causing levels regardless of the number of transgenes or the types of FAD mutations that they (or additional transgenes) carry. Since the AβPP-independent C99 production pathway is inoperative in mice, the current transgenic models have no potential for developing the full spectrum of AD pathology. What they display are only effects of the AβPP-derived iAβ-elicited neuronal ISR. The paper describes strategies to construct adequate transgenic AD models. It also details the utilization of human neuronal cells as the only adequate model system currently available for conventional and unconventional AD. The final alteration of the ACH2.0, introduced in the present Perspective, is that AβPP, which supports neuronal functionality and viability, is, after all, potentially produced in AD-affected neurons, albeit not conventionally but in an ISR-driven and -compatible process. Thus, the present narrative begins with the “omnipotent” Aβ capable of both triggering and driving the disease and ends up with this peptide largely dislodged from its pedestal and retaining its central role in triggering the disease in only one, although prevalent (conventional), category of AD (and driving it in none). Among interesting inferences of the present Perspective is the determination that “sporadic AD” is not sporadic at all (“non-familial” would be a much better designation). The term has fatalistic connotations, implying that the disease can strike at random. This is patently not the case: The conventional disease affects a distinct subpopulation, and the basis for unconventional AD is well understood. Another conclusion is that, unless prevented, the occurrence of conventional AD is inevitable given a sufficiently long lifespan. This Perspective also defines therapeutic directions not to be taken as well as auspicious ways forward. The former category includes ACH-based drugs (those interfering with the proteolytic production of Aβ and/or depleting extracellular Aβ). They are legitimate (albeit inefficient) preventive agents for conventional AD. There is, however, a proverbial snowball’s chance in hell of them being effective in symptomatic AD, lecanemab, donanemab, and any other “…mab” or “…stat” notwithstanding. They comprise Aβ-specific antibodies, inhibitors of beta- and gamma-secretase, and modulators of the latter. In the latter category, among ways to go are the following: (1) Depletion of iAβ, which, if sufficiently “deep”, opens up a tantalizing possibility of once-in-a-lifetime preventive transient treatment for conventional AD and aging-associated cognitive decline, AACD. (2) Composite therapy comprising the degradation of C99/iAβ and concurrent inhibition of the neuronal ISR. A single transient treatment could be sufficient to arrest the progression of conventional AD and prevent its recurrence for life. Multiple recurrent treatments would achieve the same outcome in unconventional AD. Alternatively, the sustained reduction/removal of unconventional neuronal ISR-eliciting stressors through the elimination of their source would convert unconventional AD into conventional one, preventable/treatable by a single transient administration of the composite C99/iAβ depletion/ISR suppression therapy. Efficient and suitable ISR inhibitors are available, and it is explicitly clear where to look for C99/iAβ-specific targeted degradation agents—activators of BACE1 and, especially, BACE2. Directly acting C99/iAβ-specific degradation agents such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) and molecular-glue degraders (MGDs) are also viable options. (3) A circumscribed shift (either upstream or downstream) of the position of transcription start site (TSS) of the human AβPP gene, or, alternatively, a gene editing-mediated excision or replacement of a small, defined segment of its portion encoding 5′-untranslated region of AβPP mRNA; targeting AβPP RNA with anti-antisense oligonucleotides is another possibility. If properly executed, these RNA-based strategies would not interfere with the protein-coding potential of AβPP mRNA, and each would be capable of both preventing and stopping the AβPP-independent generation of C99 and thus of either preventing AD or arresting the progression of the disease in its conventional and unconventional forms. The paper is interspersed with “validation” sections: every conceptually significant notion is either validated by the existing data or an experimental procedure validating it is proposed. Full article

Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs) are critical modulators of immune and inflammatory responses, yet their roles in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders remain incompletely understood. While IRFs are recognized for their regulatory functions in neuroinflammation, microglial activation, and neuronal survival, their dual roles as both drivers of pathological inflammation and mediators of neuroprotective pathways underscore a sophisticated regulatory paradox in neurodegenerative disorders. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on IRF-mediated neuroinflammation in AD and related diseases, focusing on the multifaceted functions of key IRF family members, including IRF1, IRF3, and IRF7. We critically evaluate their divergent roles: IRF1 and IRF3, for instance, exacerbate neuroinflammatory cascades and amyloid-beta (Aβ) pathology in AD, whereas IRF7 may paradoxically suppress inflammation under specific conditions. Additionally, we explore IRF dysregulation in Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington’s disease, emphasizing shared and distinct mechanisms across neurodegenerative disorders. Restoring IRF balance through genetic manipulation, small-molecule inhibitors, or microbiome-derived modulators could attenuate neuroinflammation, enhance Aβ clearance, and protect neuronal integrity. Ultimately, this work provides a framework for future research to harness IRF signaling pathways in the development of precision therapies for AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. Full article

The amyloid hypothesis is the predominant model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis, suggesting that amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide is the primary driver of neurotoxicity and a cascade of pathological events in the central nervous system. Aβ aggregation into oligomers and deposits triggers various processes, such as vascular damage, inflammation-induced astrocyte and microglia activation, disrupted neuronal ionic homeostasis, oxidative stress, abnormal kinase and phosphatase activity, tau phosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangle formation, cognitive dysfunction, synaptic loss, cell death, and, ultimately, dementia. Molecular dynamics (MD) is a powerful structure-based drug design (SBDD) approach that aids in understanding the properties, functions, and mechanisms of action or inhibition of biomolecules. As the only method capable of simulating atomic-level internal motions, MD provides unique insights that cannot be obtained through other techniques. Integrating experimental data with MD simulations allows for a more comprehensive understanding of biological processes and molecular interactions. This review summarizes and evaluates MD studies from the past decade on small molecules, including endogenous compounds and repurposed drugs, that inhibit amyloid beta. Furthermore, it outlines key considerations for future MD simulations of amyloid inhibitors, offering a potential framework for studies aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of amyloid beta inhibition by small molecules. Full article

For decades, Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) research has focused on the amyloid cascade hypothesis, which identifies amyloid-beta (Aβ) as the primary driver of the disease. However, the consistent failure of Aβ-targeted therapies to demonstrate efficacy, coupled with significant safety concerns, underscores the need to rethink our approach to AD treatment. Emerging evidence points to microbial infections as environmental factors in AD pathoetiology. Although a definitive causal link remains unestablished, the collective evidence is compelling. This review explores unconventional perspectives and emerging paradigms regarding microbial involvement in AD pathogenesis, emphasizing the gut–brain axis, brain biofilms, the oral microbiome, and viral infections. Transgenic mouse models show that gut microbiota dysregulation precedes brain Aβ accumulation, emphasizing gut–brain signaling pathways. Viral infections like Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may lead to AD by modulating host processes like the immune system. Aβ peptide’s antimicrobial function as a response to microbial infection might inadvertently promote AD. We discuss potential microbiome-based therapies as promising strategies for managing and potentially preventing AD progression. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) restores gut microbial balance, reduces Aβ accumulation, and improves cognition in preclinical models. Probiotics and prebiotics reduce neuroinflammation and Aβ plaques, while antiviral therapies targeting HSV-1 and vaccines like the shingles vaccine show potential to mitigate AD pathology. Developing effective treatments requires standardized methods to identify and measure microbial infections in AD patients, enabling personalized therapies that address individual microbial contributions to AD pathogenesis. Further research is needed to clarify the interactions between microbes and Aβ, explore bacterial and viral interplay, and understand their broader effects on host processes to translate these insights into clinical interventions. Full article

The disorder and heterogeneity of low-molecular-weight amyloid-beta oligomers (AβOs) underlie their participation in multiple modes of cellular dysfunction associated with the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The lack of specified conformational states in these species complicates efforts to select or design small molecules to targeting discrete pathogenic states. Furthermore, targeting AβOs alone may be therapeutically insufficient, as AD progresses as a multifactorial, self-amplifying cascade. To address these challenges, we have screened the activity of seven new candidates that serve as Paramagnetic Amyloid Ligand (PAL) candidates. PALs are bifunctional small molecules that both remodel the AβO structure and localize a potent antioxidant that mimics the activity of SOD within live cells. The candidates are built from either a stilbene or curcumin scaffold with nitroxyl moiety to serve as catalytic antioxidants. Measurements of PAL AβO binding and remolding along with assessments of bioactivity allow for the extraction of useful SAR information from screening data. One candidate (HO-4450; PMT-307), with a six-membered nitroxyl ring attached to a stilbene ring, displays the highest potency in protecting against cell-derived Aβ. A preliminary low-dose evaluation in AD model mice provides evidence of modest treatment effects by HO-4450. The results for the curcumin PALs demonstrate that the retention of the native curcumin phenolic groups is advantageous to the design of the hybrid PAL candidates. Finally, the PAL remodeling of AβO secondary structures shows a reasonable correlation between a candidate’s bioactivity and its ability to reduce the fraction of antiparallel β-strand. Full article

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) presents a public health challenge due to its progressive neurodegeneration, cognitive decline, and memory loss. The amyloid cascade hypothesis, which postulates that the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides initiates a cascade leading to AD, has dominated research and therapeutic strategies. The failure of recent Aβ-targeted therapies to yield conclusive benefits necessitates further exploration of AD pathology. This review proposes the Mitochondrial–Neurovascular–Metabolic (MNM) hypothesis, which integrates mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired neurovascular regulation, and systemic metabolic disturbances as interrelated contributors to AD pathogenesis. Mitochondrial dysfunction, a hallmark of AD, leads to oxidative stress and bioenergetic failure. Concurrently, the breakdown of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and impaired cerebral blood flow, which characterize neurovascular dysregulation, accelerate neurodegeneration. Metabolic disturbances such as glucose hypometabolism and insulin resistance further impair neuronal function and survival. This hypothesis highlights the interconnectedness of these pathways and suggests that therapeutic strategies targeting mitochondrial health, neurovascular integrity, and metabolic regulation may offer more effective interventions. The MNM hypothesis addresses these multifaceted aspects of AD, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding disease progression and developing novel therapeutic approaches. This approach paves the way for developing innovative therapeutic strategies that could significantly improve outcomes for millions affected worldwide. Full article

Although Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is traditionally viewed as a central nervous system disorder driven by the cerebral accumulation of toxic beta-amyloid (Aβ) peptide, new interpretations of the amyloid cascade hypothesis have led to the recognition of the dynamic equilibrium in which Aβ resides and the importance of peripheral Aβ production and degradation in maintaining healthy Aβ levels. Our review sheds light on the critical role of peripheral organs, particularly the liver, in the metabolism and clearance of circulating Aβ. We explore the mechanisms of Aβ transport across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) via transport proteins such as LRP1 and P-glycoprotein. We also examine how peripheral clearance mechanisms, including enzymatic degradation and phagocytic activity, impact Aβ homeostasis. Our review also discusses potential therapeutic strategies targeting peripheral Aβ clearance pathways. By enhancing these pathways, we propose a novel approach to reducing cerebral Aβ burden, potentially slowing AD progression. Full article

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that comprises amyloid-beta protein (Aβ) as a main component of neuritic plaques. Its deposition is considered a trigger for AD pathogenesis, progression, and the clinical symptoms of cognitive impairment. Some distinct pathological features of AD include phosphorylation of tau protein, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. These pathological consequences tend to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in the dysregulation of various signaling pathways of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. The relationship between the Aβ cascade and oxidative stress in AD pathogenesis is like a “chicken and egg” story, with the etiology of the disease regarding these two factors remaining a question of “which comes first.” However, in this review, we have tried our best to clarify the interconnection between these two mechanisms and to show the precise cause-and-effect relationship. Based on the above hallmarks of AD, several therapeutic strategies using natural antioxidants, monoclonal antibodies, and vaccines are employed as anti-Aβ therapy to decrease ROS, Aβ burden, chronic neuroinflammation, and synaptic failure. These natural antioxidants and immunotherapeutics have demonstrated significant neuroprotective effects and symptomatic relief in various in vitro and in vivo models, as well as in clinical trials for AD. However, none of them have received final approval to enter the drug market for mitigating AD. In this review, we extensively elaborate on the pitfalls, assurances, and important crosstalk between oxidative stress and Aβ concerning current anti-Aβ therapy. Additionally, we discuss future strategies for the development of more Aβ-targeted approaches and the optimization of AD treatment and mitigation. Full article

The centrality of amyloid-beta (Aβ) is an indisputable tenet of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). It was initially indicated by the detection (1991) of a mutation within Aβ protein precursor (AβPP) segregating with the disease, which served as a basis for the long-standing Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (ACH) theory of AD. In the intervening three decades, this notion was affirmed and substantiated by the discovery of numerous AD-causing and AD-protective mutations with all, without an exception, affecting the structure, production, and intraneuronal degradation of Aβ. The ACH postulated that the disease is caused and driven by extracellular Aβ. When it became clear that this is not the case, and the ACH was largely discredited, a new theory of AD, dubbed ACH2.0 to re-emphasize the centrality of Aβ, was formulated. In the ACH2.0, AD is caused by physiologically accumulated intraneuronal Aβ (iAβ) derived from AβPP. Upon reaching the critical threshold, it triggers activation of the autonomous AβPP-independent iAβ generation pathway; its output is retained intraneuronally and drives the AD pathology. The bridge between iAβ derived from AβPP and that generated independently of AβPP is the neuronal integrated stress response (ISR) elicited by the former. The ISR severely suppresses cellular protein synthesis; concurrently, it activates the production of a small subset of proteins, which apparently includes components necessary for operation of the AβPP-independent iAβ generation pathway that are absent under regular circumstances. The above sequence of events defines “conventional” AD, which is both caused and driven by differentially derived iAβ. Since the ISR can be elicited by a multitude of stressors, the logic of the ACH2.0 mandates that another class of AD, referred to as “unconventional”, has to occur. Unconventional AD is defined as a disease where a stressor distinct from AβPP-derived iAβ elicits the neuronal ISR. Thus, the essence of both, conventional and unconventional, forms of AD is one and the same, namely autonomous, self-sustainable, AβPP-independent production of iAβ. What distinguishes them is the manner of activation of this pathway, i.e., the mode of causation of the disease. In unconventional AD, processes occurring at locations as distant from and seemingly as unrelated to the brain as, say, the knee can potentially trigger the disease. The present study asserts that these processes include traumatic brain injury (TBI), chronic traumatic encephalopathy, viral and bacterial infections, and a wide array of inflammatory conditions. It considers the pathways which are common to all these occurrences and culminate in the elicitation of the neuronal ISR, analyzes the dynamics of conventional versus unconventional AD, shows how the former can morph into the latter, explains how a single TBI can hasten the occurrence of AD and why it takes multiple TBIs to trigger the disease, and proposes the appropriate therapeutic strategies. It posits that yet another class of unconventional AD may occur where the autonomous AβPP-independent iAβ production pathway is initiated by an ISR-unrelated activator, and consolidates the above notions in a theory of AD, designated ACH2.0/E (for expanded ACH2.0), which incorporates the ACH2.0 as its special case and retains the centrality of iAβ produced independently of AβPP as the driving agent of the disease. Full article

An improved understanding of the pathobiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) should lead ultimately to an earlier and more accurate diagnosis of AD, providing the opportunity to intervene earlier in the disease process and to improve outcomes. The known hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease include amyloid-β plaques and neurofibrillary tau tangles. It is now clear that an imbalance between production and clearance of the amyloid beta protein and related Aβ peptides, especially Aβ42, is a very early, initiating factor in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis, leading to aggregates of hyperphosphorylation and misfolded tau protein, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. In this article, we review how the AD diagnostic process has been transformed in recent decades by our ability to measure these various elements of the pathological cascade through the use of imaging and fluid biomarkers. The more recently developed plasma biomarkers, especially phosphorylated-tau217 (p-tau217), have utility for screening and diagnosis of the earliest stages of AD. These biomarkers can also be used to measure target engagement by disease-modifying therapies and the response to treatment. Full article

New data suggest that the aggregation of misfolded native proteins initiates and drives the pathogenic cascade that leads to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other age-related neurodegenerative disorders. We propose a unifying single toxin theory of brain neurodegeneration that identifies new targets and approaches to the development of disease-modifying treatments. An extensive body of genetic evidence suggests soluble aggregates of beta-amyloid (Aβ) as the primary neurotoxin in the pathogenesis of AD. New insights from fluid biomarkers, imaging, and clinical studies provide further evidence for the decisive impact of toxic Aβ species in the initiation and progression of AD. Understanding the distinct roles of soluble and insoluble amyloid aggregates on AD pathogenesis has been the key missing piece of the Alzheimer’s puzzle. Data from clinical trials with anti-amyloid agents and recent advances in the diagnosis of AD demonstrate that the driving insult in biologically defined AD is the neurotoxicity of soluble Aβ aggregates, called oligomers and protofibrils, rather than the relatively inert insoluble mature fibrils and amyloid plaques. Amyloid oligomers appear to be the primary factor causing the synaptic impairment, neuronal stress, spreading of tau pathology, and eventual cell death that lead to the clinical syndrome of AD dementia. All other biochemical effects and neurodegenerative changes in the brain that are observed in AD are a response to or a downstream effect of this initial toxic insult by oligomers. Other neurodegenerative disorders follow a similar pattern of pathogenesis, in which normal brain proteins with important biological functions become trapped in the aging brain due to impaired clearance and then misfold and aggregate into neurotoxic species that exhibit prion-like behavior. These aggregates then spread through the brain and cause disease-specific neurodegeneration. Targeting the inhibition of this initial step in neurodegeneration by blocking the misfolding and aggregation of healthy proteins has the potential to slow or arrest disease progression, and if treatment is administered early in the course of AD and other neurodegenerative disorders, it may delay or prevent the onset of clinical symptoms. Full article