Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = active middle ear implant

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 1629 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Proteomic Landscape of Cochlear Implant Trauma: An iTRAQ-Based Quantitative Analysis Utilizing an Ex Vivo Model
by Jake Langlie, Rahul Mittal, David H. Elisha, Jaimee Cooper, Hannah Marwede, Julian Purrinos, Maria-Pia Tuset, Keelin McKenna, Max Zalta, Jeenu Mittal and Adrien A. Eshraghi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5115; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145115 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 330
Abstract
Background: Cochlear implantation is widely used to provide auditory rehabilitation to individuals with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, electrode insertion during cochlear implantation leads to inner ear trauma, damage to sensory structures, and consequently, loss of residual hearing. There is very limited information [...] Read more.
Background: Cochlear implantation is widely used to provide auditory rehabilitation to individuals with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, electrode insertion during cochlear implantation leads to inner ear trauma, damage to sensory structures, and consequently, loss of residual hearing. There is very limited information regarding the target proteins involved in electrode insertion trauma (EIT) following cochlear implantation. Methods: The aim of our study was to identify target proteins and host molecular pathways involved in cochlear damage following EIT utilizing the iTRAQ™ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification) technique using our ex vivo model. The organ of Corti (OC) explants were dissected from postnatal day 3 rats and subjected to EIT or left untreated (control). The proteins were extracted, labelled, and subjected to ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Results: We identified distinct molecular pathways involved in EIT-induced cochlear damage. Confocal microscopy confirmed the expression of these identified proteins in OC explants subjected to EIT. By separating the apical, middle, and basal cochlear turns, we deciphered a topographic array of host molecular pathways that extend from the base to the apex of the cochlea, which are activated post-trauma following cochlear implantation. Conclusions: The identification of target proteins involved in cochlear damage will provide novel therapeutic targets for the development of effective treatment modalities for the preservation of residual hearing in implanted individuals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3652 KiB  
Article
Outcomes of Active Middle Ear Implants: Speech Perception and Quality of Life
by Marzouqi Salamah, Athair Alradhi, Farid Alzhrani and Medhat Yousef
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(8), 883; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080883 - 21 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1233
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate audiological outcomes, quality of life, and complications in patients implanted with Active middle ear implants (AMEI). The secondary objective is to investigate the required duration after implantation to reach satisfactory outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included 31 patients implanted with [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate audiological outcomes, quality of life, and complications in patients implanted with Active middle ear implants (AMEI). The secondary objective is to investigate the required duration after implantation to reach satisfactory outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included 31 patients implanted with Active middle ear implants (AMEI) with different methods of floating mass transducer attachment. Patients with incomplete medical records and those who did not respond to postoperative follow-up were excluded. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and at one, three, and six months postoperatively. The assessment included Pure Tone Average (PTA4), speech reception threshold (SRT), and speech discrimination score (SDS). The Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) was also used to evaluate levels of satisfaction. Result: There are no significant differences found in PTA and SRT between the 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits. The speech reception threshold (SRT) showed a statistically significant improvement at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operative measures compared to pre-operative. Additionally, the SDS exhibited a significant increase only after 12 months, compared to the 3-month time point. However, satisfaction levels did not significantly differ between the 6-month and 12-month measurements following surgery. Conclusion: The Vibrant Soundbridge improves subjective satisfaction scores and audiological test scores in patients with different types of hearing loss. AMEI has a low risk of medical or surgical complications, the ease of using a hearing implant, and the social benefits of good hearing and communication. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2766 KiB  
Article
Middle Ear Active Implant Indications, Comparative Audiometric Results from Different Approaches, and Coupling with the Vibrant Soundbridge®: A Single Center Experience over More Than 20 Years
by Joan Lorente-Piera, Raquel Manrique-Huarte, Janaina P. Lima, Diego Calavia and Manuel Manrique
Audiol. Res. 2024, 14(4), 721-735; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres14040061 - 21 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1510
Abstract
Background: Middle ear active implants, such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB), offer an alternative to reconstructive surgery and other implantable hearing aid systems for patients with conductive, mixed, or sensorineural hearing loss. The primary objective of this work is to describe the auditory [...] Read more.
Background: Middle ear active implants, such as the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB), offer an alternative to reconstructive surgery and other implantable hearing aid systems for patients with conductive, mixed, or sensorineural hearing loss. The primary objective of this work is to describe the auditory results obtained with VSB in our patient cohort, measuring the auditory gain in terms of average tonal thresholds and spoken word discrimination at 65 dB. Secondly, auditory gain differences between different types of hearing loss, coupling to the ossicular chain compared to round and oval windows, and the impact of open versus more conservative surgical approaches, were analyzed. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study, with retrospective data collection, was conducted at a tertiary care center. Clinical and audiometric data pre- and post-implantation were included, from patients who underwent VSB device placement surgery between 2001 and 2024. Results: 55 patients with an average age of 62.58 ± 17.83 years and a slight preference in terms of the female gender (52.72%) were included in the study. The average gain in the PTA for all types of hearing loss was 41.56 ± 22.63 dB, while for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) the gain was 31.04 ± 8.80 dB. For mixed-conductive hearing loss (C-MHL) a gain of 42.96 ± 17.70 was achieved, notably, in terms of absolute values, at frequencies of 4000 and 6000 Hz, with gains reaching 49.25 ± 20.26 dB at 4 K and 51.16 ± 17.48 dB at 6 K. In terms of spoken word discrimination, for all types of hearing loss, an improvement of 75.20 ± 10.11% was achieved. However, patients with C-MHL exhibited an approximately 13% higher gain compared to those with SNHL (69.32 ± 24.58% vs. 57.79 ± 15.28%). No significant differences in auditory gain were found between open and closed surgical techniques, nor in the proportion of adverse effects, when comparing one technique with the other. Conclusions: The VSB is effective in improving hearing in patients with mixed, conductive, and sensorineural hearing loss, with significant gains at high frequencies, especially through the round window membrane approach. The choice of surgical technique should consider the patient’s anatomical characteristics and specific needs in order to optimize auditory outcomes and minimize postoperative complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hearing Loss: Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1470 KiB  
Article
Cochlear Implantation: Long-Term Effect of Early Activation on Electrode Impedance
by Asma Alahmadi, Yassin Abdelsamad, Medhat Yousef, Fida Almuhawas, Ahmed Hafez, Farid Alzhrani and Abdulrahman Hagr
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3299; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113299 - 3 Jun 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1563
Abstract
Objectives: The growing adoption of cochlear implants (CIs) necessitates understanding the factors influencing long-term performance and improved outcomes. This work investigated the long-term effect of early activation of CIs on electrode impedance in a large sample of CI users at different time [...] Read more.
Objectives: The growing adoption of cochlear implants (CIs) necessitates understanding the factors influencing long-term performance and improved outcomes. This work investigated the long-term effect of early activation of CIs on electrode impedance in a large sample of CI users at different time points. Methods: A retrospective study on 915 ears from CI patients who were implanted between 2015 and 2020. According to their CI audio processor activation time, the patients were categorized into early activation (activated 1 day after surgery, n = 481) and classical activation (activated 4 weeks after surgery, n = 434) groups. Then, the impact of the activation times on the electrode impedance values, along the electrode array contacts, at different time points up to two years was studied and analyzed. Results: The early activation group demonstrated lower impedance values across all the electrode array sections compared to the classical activation at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years post-implantation. At 1 month, early activation was associated with a reduction of 0.34 kΩ, 0.46 kΩ, and 0.37 kΩ in the apical, middle, and basal sections, respectively. These differences persisted at subsequent intervals. Conclusions: Early activation leads to sustained reductions in the electrode impedance compared to classical activation (CA), suggesting that earlier activation might positively affect long-term CI outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1320 KiB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review of Current Audiological Treatment Options for Patients with Treacher Collins Syndrome (TCS) and Surgical and Audiological Experiences of an Otorhinolaryngologist with TCS
by Ivana Marinac, Robert Trotić and Andro Košec
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(1), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010081 - 10 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2714
Abstract
Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) is a rare congenital craniofacial condition that affects approximately one out of fifty thousand births. Different ratios of TCS patients have conductive hearing loss: 88%1 vs. 91.4–100.00%2. For this reason, it was examined which hearing solutions [...] Read more.
Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) is a rare congenital craniofacial condition that affects approximately one out of fifty thousand births. Different ratios of TCS patients have conductive hearing loss: 88%1 vs. 91.4–100.00%2. For this reason, it was examined which hearing solutions can be used with this condition and how effective they are. A systematic literature review was conducted, which showed that the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, OSIA), the bone conduction implant (Bonebridge) or the active implant of the middle ear (Soundbridge) are reliable methods for the treatment of conductive hearing loss in TCS patients. After the implantation of all available hearing solutions, improved hearing and speech comprehension were observed. Additionally, a statement regarding the treatment of TCS and a personalized point of view of a clinical expert with TCS were provided. However, due to the small amount of data, no general recommendations can be given for the treatment of hearing loss in TCS patients; therefore, it is advised to collect more data on hearing solutions for TCS patients in future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Medicine in Otolaryngology: Special Topic Otology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2410 KiB  
Article
Is Age a Limiting Factor for Audiological Results in Active Middle Ear Implants?
by J. Manuel Morales-Puebla, Luis Lassaletta, Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado, Miryam Calvino and Javier Gavilán
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(12), 1650; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13121650 - 26 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1933
Abstract
Active middle ear implants (AMEI) are implantable options for patients with sensorineural, conductive, or mixed hearing loss who are not good candidates for hearing aids. The aim of this study was to compare audiological, surgical, quality of life, and sound quality outcomes in [...] Read more.
Active middle ear implants (AMEI) are implantable options for patients with sensorineural, conductive, or mixed hearing loss who are not good candidates for hearing aids. The aim of this study was to compare audiological, surgical, quality of life, and sound quality outcomes in adults <60 and ≥60 years receiving an AMEI. Twenty adult patients who underwent AMEI implantation were divided into two groups, <60 and ≥60 y. Preoperative tests included pure-tone average and speech discrimination score (SDS) at 65 dB for disyllabic words in quiet. Postoperative measures included AMEI-aided bone conduction threshold, free-field warble-tone threshold, and SDS at 65 dB for disyllabic words in quiet 12 months after the AMEI fitting. Subjective benefit was evaluated using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19). Mean functional gain was 32 and 30 dB, and SDS at 65 dB improved from 19 to 95% and from 31 to 84% in the <60 and ≥60 y groups, respectively. All NCIQ domains improved following surgery, and all patients had a positive overall GBI score. The mean HISQUI19 score was 97 in both age groups. AMEIs are an effective hearing restoration method for older adults suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Medicine in Otolaryngology: Special Topic Otology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 995 KiB  
Article
Medical Safety and Device Reliability of Active Transcutaneous Middle Ear and Bone Conducting Implants: A Long-Term Multi-Centre Observational Study
by Deborah Vickers, John Briggs, Wiebke Lamping, Rachel Andrew, Mina Bingham, Joseph Toner, Stacey Cooper, Patrick Spielman, Hashmat Ghulam, Terry Nunn, Abi Asher, Susan Eitutis, Mark Chung, Anna Skibinska, Robert Gardner, Francesca Routh, Tom Wilson, Lisa Kennedy, Shakeel Saeed and VERS Clinical Support Team
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(14), 8279; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148279 - 18 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1631
Abstract
Active bone-conducting hearing devices (aBCHD; e.g., MEDEL Bonebridge® (BB)) and active middle ear implants (aMEI; e.g., MEDEL Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB)) use radio frequency transmission to send information from an external microphone and sound processor to an internally implanted transducer. These devices [...] Read more.
Active bone-conducting hearing devices (aBCHD; e.g., MEDEL Bonebridge® (BB)) and active middle ear implants (aMEI; e.g., MEDEL Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB)) use radio frequency transmission to send information from an external microphone and sound processor to an internally implanted transducer. These devices potentially have an advantage over devices with percutaneous links because the skin is closed over the implantable components, which should reduce the risk of skin problems and infection. On the other hand, surgical procedures are more complex, with a greater risk of damage due to surgery. The objectives of this research were to quantify the reliability and long-term survival of MEDEL VSB and BB devices, determine the adverse and serious adverse device-related complications, and consider associated causes. A multi-center observational retrospective and prospective study was conducted at eleven auditory implant centers in the United Kingdom. Data was collected using a surgical questionnaire and audiological reports. Data were obtained from patient notes or from prospective cases that had a minimum follow-up of one year post-implant. Consecutive patient records were reviewed. Datasets from 109 BB and 163 VSB were reviewed. Of these, 205 were retrospective case note reviews, and 67 were prospective cases. The mean follow-up was 4 and 6 years, respectively, for BB and VSB. Kaplan–Meier Survival analyses indicated that the BB survival was 97% and 93.3% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, and the VSB was 92.1% and 87% at the same time points. This is a large cohort study for the field and has indicated that BB and VSB are safe interventions. Care should be taken to monitor magnet strength in the first few months. For the majority of device-related effects, there was no apparent association with etiology. However, an interesting pattern emerged for individuals who exhibited an inflammatory response, e.g., adhesions or device extrusion, and those with a history of chronic suppurative otitis media. This should be considered in future work and is not surprising given that many VSB recipients have a complicated hearing history, often associated with otitis media. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hearing Loss: From Pathophysiology to Therapies and Habilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 722 KiB  
Article
Battery Lifespan of an Implantable Middle Ear Device
by Luca Bruschini, Francesca Forli, Giacomo Fiacchini, Rachele Canelli, Stefano Berrettini and Francesco Lazzerini
Audiol. Res. 2022, 12(5), 485-492; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12050049 - 7 Sep 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2992
Abstract
Background: The Carina system (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia) is a totally implantable device providing acoustic amplification in adult patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural or mixed hearing loss. One of the main concerns about such a totally implantable device has been represented by the subcutaneous [...] Read more.
Background: The Carina system (Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia) is a totally implantable device providing acoustic amplification in adult patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural or mixed hearing loss. One of the main concerns about such a totally implantable device has been represented by the subcutaneous battery lifespan. The aim of this article is to report the analysis of battery performances in a series of Carina-implanted patients after a long follow up. Methods: In this retrospective study, the technical data of a series of patients implanted with the Carina middle ear implant in our clinic have been analysed, extracting the data from the log of telemetric measures. Results: The mean lifespan cutback was 0.43 h/years (from 0 to 0.71 h/year), with a strong negative significant correlation between the follow-up period and the percentage of battery residual lifespan. Conclusion: The lifespan of the Carina’s battery seems consistent with the manufacturer statement of a pluri-decennial lifespan, avoiding the need of an early surgical substitution and providing a full day of use of the system even after up to 12 years from the implantation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1011 KiB  
Article
Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study
by Luis Lassaletta, Miryam Calvino, Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Katarzyna B. Cywka, Natalia Czajka, Justyna Kutyba, Dayse Tavora-Vieira, Paul van de Heyning, Griet Mertens, Hinrich Staecker, Bryan Humphrey, Mario Zernotti, Maximo Zernotti, Astrid Magele, Marlene Ploder and Julia Speranza Zabeu
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(5), 2503; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052503 - 22 Feb 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3040
Abstract
The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of hearing implant (HI) use on quality of life (QoL) and to determine which QoL measure(s) quantify QoL with greater sensitivity in users of different types of HIs. Participants were adult cochlear [...] Read more.
The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of hearing implant (HI) use on quality of life (QoL) and to determine which QoL measure(s) quantify QoL with greater sensitivity in users of different types of HIs. Participants were adult cochlear implant (CI), active middle ear implant (VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE (VSB)), or active transcutaneous bone conduction implant (the BONEBRIDGE (BB)) recipients. Generic QoL and disease-specific QoL were assessed at three intervals: pre-activation, 6 months of device use, and 12 months of device use. 169 participants completed the study (110 CI, 18VSB, and 41BB). CI users’ QoL significantly increased from 0–6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. On some device-specific measures, their QoL also significantly increased between 6 and 12 m device use. VSB users’ QoL significantly increased between all tested intervals with the disease-specific measure but not the generic measure. BB users’ QoL significantly increased from 0–6 m device use on both the generic- and the disease-specific measures. In sum, HI users experienced significant postoperative increases in QoL within their first 12 m of device use, especially when disease-specific measures were used. Disease-specific QoL measures appeared to be more sensitive than their generic counterparts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2021 KiB  
Article
The Bonebridge BCI 602 Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant in Children: Objective and Subjective Benefits
by Katarzyna B. Cywka, Henryk Skarżyński, Bartłomiej Król and Piotr H. Skarżyński
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(24), 5916; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245916 - 16 Dec 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3577
Abstract
Background: the Bonebridge hearing implant is an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant suitable for various types of hearing loss. It was first launched in 2012 as the BCI 601, with a newer internal part (BCI 602) released in 2019. With the new size [...] Read more.
Background: the Bonebridge hearing implant is an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant suitable for various types of hearing loss. It was first launched in 2012 as the BCI 601, with a newer internal part (BCI 602) released in 2019. With the new size and shape, the BCI 602 can be used in patients previously excluded due to insufficient anatomical conditions, especially in patients with congenital defects of the outer and middle ear. Objectives: the purpose of this study is to evaluate the objective and subjective benefits of the new Bonebridge BCI 602 in children who have hearing impairment due to conductive or mixed hearing loss. Safety and effectiveness of the device was assessed. Methods: the study group included 22 children aged 8–18 years (mean age 14.7 years) who had either conductive or mixed hearing loss. All patients were implanted unilaterally with the new Bonebridge BCI 602 implant. Pure tone audiometry, speech recognition tests (in quiet and noise), and free-field audiometry were performed before and after implantation. Word recognition scores were evaluated using the Demenko and Pruszewicz Polish Monosyllabic Word Test, and speech reception thresholds in noise were assessed using the Polish Sentence Matrix Test. The subjective assessment of benefits was carried outusing the APHAB (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) questionnaire. Results: after implantation of the Bonebridge BCI 602 all patients showed a statistically significant improvement in hearing and speech understanding. The mean word recognition score (WRS) changed from 12.1% before implantation to 87.3% after 6 months. Mean speech reception threshold (SRT) before implantation was +4.79 dB SNR and improved to −1.29 dB SNR after 6 months. All patients showed stable postoperative results. The APHAB questionnaire showed that difficulties in hearing decreased after implantation, with a statistically significant improvement in global score. Pre-operative scores (M = 35.7) were significantly worse than post-operative scores at 6 months (M = 25.7). Conclusions: the present study confirms that the Bonebridge BCI 602 is an innovative and effective solution, especially for patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss due to anatomical ear defects. The Bonebridge BCI 602 system provides valuable and stable audiological and surgical benefits. Subjective assessment also confirms the effectiveness of the BCI 602. The BCI 602 offers the same amplification as the BCI601, but with a smaller size. The smaller dimensions make it an effective treatment option for a wider group of patients, especially children with congenital defects of the outer and middle ear. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5534 KiB  
Article
A Miniature, Fiber-Optic Vibrometer for Measuring Unintended Acoustic Output of Active Hearing Implants during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by Guy Fierens, Joris Walraevens, Ronald Peeters, Nicolas Verhaert and Christ Glorieux
Sensors 2021, 21(19), 6589; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196589 - 2 Oct 2021
Viewed by 2864
Abstract
Making use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostics on patients with implanted medical devices requires caution due to mutual interactions between the device and the electromagnetic fields used by the scanner that can cause a number of adverse events. The presented study [...] Read more.
Making use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostics on patients with implanted medical devices requires caution due to mutual interactions between the device and the electromagnetic fields used by the scanner that can cause a number of adverse events. The presented study offers a novel test method to quantify the risk of unintended output of acoustically stimulating hearing implants. The design and operating principle of an all-optical, MRI safe vibrometer is outlined, followed by an experimental verification of a prototype. Results obtained in an MRI environment indicate that the system can detect peak displacements down to 8 pm for audible frequencies. Feasibility testing was performed with an active middle ear implant that was exposed to several pulse sequences in a 1.5 Tesla MRI environment. Magnetic field induced actuator vibrations, measured during scanning, turned out to be equivalent to estimated sound pressure levels between 25 and 85 dB SPL, depending on the signal frequency. These sound pressure levels are situated well below ambient sound pressure levels generated by the MRI scanning process. The presented case study therefore indicates a limited risk of audible unintended output for the examined hearing implant during MRI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Medical Applications of Sensor Systems and Devices)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5181 KiB  
Communication
Design Study of a Round Window Piezoelectric Transducer for Active Middle Ear Implants
by Dong Ho Shin
Sensors 2021, 21(3), 946; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030946 - 31 Jan 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3364
Abstract
This report describes the design of a new piezoelectric transducer for round window (RW)-driven middle ear implants. The transducer consists of a piezoelectric element, gold-coated copper bellows, silicone elastomer (polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS), metal cylinder (tungsten), and titanium housing. The piezoelectric element is fixed to [...] Read more.
This report describes the design of a new piezoelectric transducer for round window (RW)-driven middle ear implants. The transducer consists of a piezoelectric element, gold-coated copper bellows, silicone elastomer (polydimethylsiloxane, PDMS), metal cylinder (tungsten), and titanium housing. The piezoelectric element is fixed to the titanium housing and mechanical resonance is generated by the interaction of the bellows, PDMS, and tungsten cylinder. The dimensions of PDMS and the tungsten cylinder with output characteristics suitable for compensation of sensorineural hearing loss were derived by mechanical vibrational analysis (equivalent mechanical model and finite element analysis (FEA)). Based on the results of FEA, the RW piezoelectric transducer was implemented, and bench tests were performed under no-load conditions to confirm the output characteristics. The transducer generates an average displacement of 219.6 nm in the flat band (0.1–1 kHz); the resonance frequency is 2.3 kHz. To evaluate the output characteristics, the response was compared to that of an earlier transducer. When driven by the same voltage (6 Vp), the flat band displacement averaged 30 nm larger than that of the other transducer, and no anti-resonance was noted. Therefore, we expect that the new transducer can serve as an output device for hearing aids, and that it will improve speech recognition and treat high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss more effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2268 KiB  
Article
Biomechanics of the Human Middle Ear with Viscoelasticity of the Maxwell and the Kelvin–Voigt Type and Relaxation Effect
by Rafal Rusinek, Marcin Szymanski and Robert Zablotni
Materials 2020, 13(17), 3779; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173779 - 27 Aug 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3425
Abstract
The middle ear is one of the smallest biomechanical systems in the human body and is responsible for the hearing process. Hearing is modelled in different ways and by various methods. In this paper, three-degree-of-freedom models of the human middle ear with different [...] Read more.
The middle ear is one of the smallest biomechanical systems in the human body and is responsible for the hearing process. Hearing is modelled in different ways and by various methods. In this paper, three-degree-of-freedom models of the human middle ear with different viscoelastic properties are proposed. Model 1 uses the Maxwell type viscoelasticity, Model 2 is based on the Kelvin–Voigt viscoelasticity, and Model 3 uses the Kelvin–Voigt viscoelasticity with relaxation effect. The primary aim of the study is to compare the models and their dynamic responses to a voice excitation. The novelty of this study lies in using different models of viscoelasticity and relaxation effect that has been previously unstudied. First, mathematical models of the middle ear were built, then they were solved numerically by the Runge–Kutta procedure and finally, numerical results were compared with those obtained from experiments carried out on the temporal bone with the Laser Doppler Vibrometer. The models exhibit differences in the natural frequency and amplitudes near the second resonance. All analysed models can be used for modelling the rapidly changing processes that occur in the ear and to control active middle ear implants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Materials Modeling, Analysis and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

4 pages, 414 KiB  
Case Report
Simultaneous Vibrant Soundbridge Implantation and 2nd Stage Auricular Reconstruction for Microtia with Aural Atresia
by Lynne Hsueh Yee Lim, Ling Xiang, Jocelynne del Prado, Ee Ling Chin and Millo Achille Beltrame
Audiol. Res. 2011, 1(2), e28; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2011.e28 - 23 Sep 2011
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1
Abstract
Aural atresia and severe microtia are associated malformations that result in problems with hearing and cosmesis, associated speech and language difficulties and diminished self-esteem. In cases where middle ear ossiculoplasty and aural atresia canalplasty are expected to give poor hearing outcomes that would [...] Read more.
Aural atresia and severe microtia are associated malformations that result in problems with hearing and cosmesis, associated speech and language difficulties and diminished self-esteem. In cases where middle ear ossiculoplasty and aural atresia canalplasty are expected to give poor hearing outcomes that would eventually require the use of hearing aids, bone anchored hearing aids or active middle ear implants may be better options. This case report describes a simultaneous Vibrant Soundbridge implantation and 2nd stage auricular reconstruction with rib graft cartilage for an 11-year-old boy with grade III microtia and aural atresia 8 months after the 1st stage reconstruction. Audiometric results of the Vibrant Soundbridge aided ear were comparable to that of the contralateral hearing aid aided ear. Full article
Back to TopTop