Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 538 KiB  
Article
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligometastases Located in the Peritoneum or in the Abdominal Wall: Preliminary Results from a Mono-Institutional Analysis
by Francesco Cuccia, Salvatore D’Alessandro, Marina Campione, Vanessa Figlia, Gianluca Mortellaro, Antonio Spera, Giulia Musicò, Antonino Abbate, Salvatore Russo, Carlo Messina, Giuseppe Carruba, Livio Blasi and Giuseppe Ferrera
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070312 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 435
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s): Peritoneal carcinosis can occur in several gastrointestinal or gynecological malignancies and its prognosis is usually poor. With the advent of more effective systemic agents, the overall survival of metastatic patients has been revolutionized and isolated peritoneal or abdominal wall metastases might benefit [...] Read more.
Purpose/Objective(s): Peritoneal carcinosis can occur in several gastrointestinal or gynecological malignancies and its prognosis is usually poor. With the advent of more effective systemic agents, the overall survival of metastatic patients has been revolutionized and isolated peritoneal or abdominal wall metastases might benefit from local treatments; Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) might be considered in selected patients with oligometastatic presentation. Materials/Methods: Oligometastases were defined according to recent ESTRO/EORTC consensus. Inclusion criteria were as follows: ECOG PS ≤ 2, written informed consent, up to five lesions to be treated at the same time, patients treated with radiotherapy schedules applying minimum 6 Gy per fraction. The primary endpoint of the study was local control (LC); acute and late toxicity, distant progression-free survival (DPFS), time-to-next systemic treatment (TNST), polymetastatic-free survival (PMFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE criteria v5.0. Statistical associations between clinical variables and outcomes were assessed using Fisher’s exact test, and Kruskal–Wallis test, as appropriate. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Between April 2020 and September 2024 a total of 26 oligometastatic lesions located in the peritoneum or in the abdominal wall detected in 20 patients received SBRT with Helical Tomotherapy. All cases have been assessed by a multidisciplinary team. Only in three patients out of twenty did more than one lesion receive SBRT: two lesions in two patients, and five lesions in a single case of colorectal cancer with ongoing third-line systemic treatment. Median total dose was 30 Gy (27–35 Gy) in five fractions (3–5). The most frequent primary neoplasm was ovarian cancer in 14/20, endometrial in 2/20, while the remaining were colorectal, vaginal, pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer. Four lesions were located in the abdominal wall, while the remaining twenty-two were located in the peritoneum. Concurrent systemic therapy was administered in 18/20 patients. With a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 6–59), our 1-year LC was 100%, while 1-year DPFS, PMFS, TNTS and OS rates were 54%, 69%, 61% and 83%, respectively. Abdominal wall location and treatment of a subsequent oligometastatic recurrence with a second course of SBRT were both significantly associated with improved OS (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). No G ≥ 3 adverse events occurred. Conclusion: Our preliminary data support the use of SBRT in selected cases of oligometastatic disease located in the peritoneum or in the abdominal wall with excellent results in terms of tolerability and promising clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Diagnosis and Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

42 pages, 19095 KiB  
Review
Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas—Current Management
by Adam Brewczyński, Agnieszka Kolasińska-Ćwikła, Beata Jabłońska and Lucjan Wyrwicz
Cancers 2025, 17(6), 1029; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17061029 - 19 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2111
Abstract
Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are infrequent neuroendocrine hypervascular neoplasms arising within different sites of the paraganglion system. They are divided into sympathetic (including pheochromocytomas and extraadrenal paragangliomas) and parasympathetic extraadrenal tumors. These tumors are usually not malignant and grow slowly; about 90% of [...] Read more.
Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are infrequent neuroendocrine hypervascular neoplasms arising within different sites of the paraganglion system. They are divided into sympathetic (including pheochromocytomas and extraadrenal paragangliomas) and parasympathetic extraadrenal tumors. These tumors are usually not malignant and grow slowly; about 90% of them are found in the adrenal paraganglia (pheochromocytomas). Extraadrenal tumors are most frequently located in the abdominal cavity (85%), followed by the thoracic cavity (12%), and head and neck (3%). About 25% of PPGLs are related to germline mutations, which are risk factors for multifocal and metastatic disease. In PPGL diagnostics, laboratory, biochemical, and imaging (anatomical and functional) examinations are used. Surgery is the standard management choice for locoregional disease. For patients who are not candidates for surgery and who have stable, not-growing, or slow-growing tumors, active observation or other less invasive techniques (i.e., stereotactic surgery, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy) are considered. In metastatic disease, systemic therapies (tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs], mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus, immunotherapy, cold somatostatin analogs [biotherapy], and radioligand therapy) are used. The prognosis for PPGLs is quite good, and the 5-year survival rate is >90%. The goal of this paper is to review knowledge on the etiopathogenesis, current diagnostics, and therapy for PPGL patients. Our paper is particularly focused on the current management of PPGLs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1965 KiB  
Article
Synchronized Contrast-Enhanced 4DCT Simulation for Target Volume Delineation in Abdominal SBRT
by Valeria Faccenda, Denis Panizza, Rita Marina Niespolo, Riccardo Ray Colciago, Giulia Rossano, Lorenzo De Sanctis, Davide Gandola, Davide Ippolito, Stefano Arcangeli and Elena De Ponti
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 4066; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234066 - 4 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1574
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To present the technical aspects of contrast-enhanced 4DCT (ce4DCT) simulation for abdominal SBRT. Methods: Twenty-two patients underwent two sequential 4DCT scans: one baseline and one contrast-enhanced with personalized delay time (tdelay) calculated to capture the tumor in the desired [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To present the technical aspects of contrast-enhanced 4DCT (ce4DCT) simulation for abdominal SBRT. Methods: Twenty-two patients underwent two sequential 4DCT scans: one baseline and one contrast-enhanced with personalized delay time (tdelay) calculated to capture the tumor in the desired contrast phase, based on diagnostic triple-phase CT. The internal target volume (ITV) was delineated on ten contrast phases, and a panel of three experts qualitatively evaluated tumor visibility. Aortic HU values were measured to refine the tdelay for subsequent patients. The commonly used approach of combining triple-phase CT with unenhanced 4DCT was simulated, and differences in target delineation were evaluated by volume, centroid shift, Dice and Jaccard indices, and mean distance agreement (MDA). The margins required to account for motion were calculated. Results: The ce4DCT acquisitions substantially improved tumor visibility over the entire breathing cycle in 20 patients, according to the experts’ unanimous evaluation. The median contrast peak time was 54.5 s, and the washout plateau was observed at 70.3 s, with mean peak and plateau HU values of 292 ± 59 and 169 ± 25. The volumes from the commonly used procedure (ITV2) were significantly smaller than the ce4DCT volumes (ITV1) (p = 0.045). The median centroid shift was 4.7 mm. The ITV1-ITV2 overlap was 69% (Dice index), 53% (Jaccard index), and 2.89 mm (MDA), with the liver volumes showing significantly lower indices compared to the pancreatic volumes (p ≤ 0.011). The margins required to better encompass ITV1 were highly variable, with mean values ≥ 4 mm in all directions except for the left–right axis. Conclusions: The ce4DCT simulation was feasible, resulting in optimal tumor enhancement with minimal resource investment, while significantly mitigating uncertainties in SBRT planning by addressing poor visibility and respiratory motion. Triple-phase 3DCT with unenhanced 4DCT led to high variability in target delineation, making the isotropic margins ineffective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Imaging for More Precise Radiotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1245 KiB  
Article
Sharing Mono-Institutional Experience of Treating Pancreatic Cancer with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
by Asmara Waheed, Shannah Murland, Eugene Yip, Amr Heikal, Sunita Ghosh, Aswin Abraham, Kim Paulson, Keith Tankel, Nawaid Usmani, Diane Severin, Clarence Wong and Kurian Joseph
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(10), 5974-5986; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100446 - 4 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1693
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an evolving treatment for the local management of pancreatic cancer (PC). The main purpose of this study is to report our initial experience in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity for PC patients treated with SBRT. [...] Read more.
Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an evolving treatment for the local management of pancreatic cancer (PC). The main purpose of this study is to report our initial experience in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity for PC patients treated with SBRT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT using abdominal compression (AC) or an end-expiratory breath-holding (EEBH) technique. The median prescribed dose was 35 Gy, delivered in five fractions. Toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: From 2017 to 2023, 17 PC patients were offered SBRT. Their median age was 69 years. The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 22.37 months. The overall survival (OS) was 94% at 1 year and 60.9% at 2 years. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 63.1% at 6 months and 56.1% at 9 months. The median OS was 26.3 months, and the median PFS was 20.6 months. The 6-month and 1-year LC rates were 71% and 50.8%, respectively. Conclusion: We are successful in implementing the SBRT program at our centre. SBRT appears to be a promising treatment option for achieving LC with limited acute toxicities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Frontiers in Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4359 KiB  
Article
Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pancreatic and Other Intra-Abdominal Cancers
by Danny Lee, Paul Renz, Seungjong Oh, Min-Sig Hwang, Daniel Pavord, Kyung Lim Yun, Colleen Collura, Mary McCauley, Athanasios (Tom) Colonias, Mark Trombetta and Alexander Kirichenko
Cancers 2023, 15(21), 5272; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215272 - 3 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1805
Abstract
A 1.5T MRI combined with a linear accelerator (Unity®, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) is a device that shows promise in MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Previous studies utilized the manufacturer’s pre-set MRI sequences (i.e., T2 Weighted (T2W)), which limited the visualization [...] Read more.
A 1.5T MRI combined with a linear accelerator (Unity®, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) is a device that shows promise in MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Previous studies utilized the manufacturer’s pre-set MRI sequences (i.e., T2 Weighted (T2W)), which limited the visualization of pancreatic and intra-abdominal tumors and organs at risk (OAR). Here, a T1 Weighted (T1W) sequence was utilized to improve the visualization of tumors and OAR for online adapted-to-position (ATP) and adapted-to-shape (ATS) during MRI-guided SBRT. Twenty-six patients, 19 with pancreatic and 7 with intra-abdominal cancers, underwent CT and MRI simulations for SBRT planning before being treated with multi-fractionated MRI-guided SBRT. The boundary of tumors and OAR was more clearly seen on T1W image sets, resulting in fast and accurate contouring during online ATP/ATS planning. Plan quality in 26 patients was dependent on OAR proximity to the target tumor and achieved 96 ± 5% and 92 ± 9% in gross tumor volume D90% and planning target volume D90%. We utilized T1W imaging (about 120 s) to shorten imaging time by 67% compared to T2W imaging (about 360 s) and improve tumor visualization, minimizing target/OAR delineation uncertainty and the treatment margin for sparing OAR. The average time-consumption of MRI-guided SBRT for the first 21 patients was 55 ± 15 min for ATP and 79 ± 20 min for ATS. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2939 KiB  
Review
Principles of Palliative and Supportive Care in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review
by Robert Mazur and Jan Trna
Biomedicines 2023, 11(10), 2690; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102690 - 1 Oct 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3858
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well known for its poor survival time. Clinical symptoms are painless jaundice or abdominal or back pain. Less specific symptoms often appear that make diagnosis difficult, e.g., weight loss, loss of appetite, nausea and vomiting, and general weakness. Only [...] Read more.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well known for its poor survival time. Clinical symptoms are painless jaundice or abdominal or back pain. Less specific symptoms often appear that make diagnosis difficult, e.g., weight loss, loss of appetite, nausea and vomiting, and general weakness. Only 10–20% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. A cure is practically only possible with a radical surgical operation. In the case of locally advanced findings, neoadjuvant therapy is administered. Among the therapeutic options offered are chemotherapy, radiotherapy (including stereotactic radiotherapy—SBRT), targeted treatment, or immunotherapy. In the case of metastatic disease, of which more than half are present at diagnosis, the goal is to relieve the patient of problems. Metastatic PDAC can cause problems arising from the localization of distant metastases, but it also locally affects the organs it infiltrates. In our review article, we focus on the largest group of patients, those with locally advanced disease and metastatic disease—symptoms related to the infiltration or destruction of the pancreatic parenchyma and the growth of the tumor into the surrounding. Therefore, we deal with biliary or duodenal obstruction, gastric outlet syndrome, bleeding and thromboembolic diseases, pain, depression, and fatigue, as well as pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and malnutrition. Metastatic spread is most often to the liver, peritoneum, or lungs. The presented overview aims to offer current therapeutic options across disciplines. In accordance with modern oncology, a multidisciplinary approach with a procedure tailored to the specific patient remains the gold standard. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Pancreatic Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 2056 KiB  
Review
Pancreatic Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities in Locoregional Therapies
by Alaa Y. Bazeed, Candace M. Day and Sanjay Garg
Cancers 2022, 14(17), 4257; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174257 - 31 Aug 2022
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 5442
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the third in the United States, making it one of the most lethal solid malignancies. Unfortunately, the symptoms of this disease are not very apparent despite an increasing incidence rate. [...] Read more.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the third in the United States, making it one of the most lethal solid malignancies. Unfortunately, the symptoms of this disease are not very apparent despite an increasing incidence rate. Therefore, at the time of diagnosis, 45% of patients have already developed metastatic tumours. Due to the aggressive nature of the pancreatic tumours, local interventions are required in addition to first-line treatments. Locoregional interventions affect a specific area of the pancreas to minimize local tumour recurrence and reduce the side effects on surrounding healthy tissues. However, compared to the number of new studies on systemic therapy, very little research has been conducted on localised interventions for PC. To address this unbalanced focus and to shed light on the tremendous potentials of locoregional therapies, this work will provide a detailed discussion of various localised treatment strategies. Most importantly, to the best of our knowledge, the aspect of localised drug delivery systems used in PC was unprecedentedly discussed in this work. This review is meant for researchers and clinicians considering utilizing local therapy for the effective treatment of PC, providing a thorough guide on recent advancements in research and clinical trials toward locoregional interventions, together with the authors’ insight into their potential improvements. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop