Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = SOCIA III appliance

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 763 KB  
Article
Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects of the SOCIA III Appliance in Patients with Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion
by Mauro Lorusso, Giovanna Jie Wang, Michele Tepedino, Angela Pia Cazzolla, Fariba Esperouz, Lucio Lo Russo and Domenico Ciavarella
Dent. J. 2025, 13(9), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090427 - 15 Sep 2025
Viewed by 772
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the dentoskeletal and postural modifications induced by treatment with the Swallowing Occlusal Contact Intercept Appliance (SOCIA III) in patients with pseudo-Class III malocclusion. The main hypothesis was that treatment with the SOCIA appliance induces significant skeletal and [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the dentoskeletal and postural modifications induced by treatment with the Swallowing Occlusal Contact Intercept Appliance (SOCIA III) in patients with pseudo-Class III malocclusion. The main hypothesis was that treatment with the SOCIA appliance induces significant skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in growing patients with pseudo-Class III malocclusion. Methods: Fifty-two pseudo-Class III malocclusion patients with a mean age of 8.5 were analyzed and compared with fifty-two untreated patients. Cephalometric evaluations were carried out at baseline (T0) and at the end of treatment. The cephalometric analysis comprised sagittal measurements (SNA, ANB, WITS, CB, ACB), dental variables (UI-PP, LI-MP, OVERJET, OVERBITE), and postural parameters (SNBa and cranio-cervical angle of the maxilla). Within-group comparisons at baseline (T0) and post-treatment (T1) were performed using the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Inter-group comparisons were based on the differences in variables between the two time points (ΔT1–T0), using the independent samples t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: At the end of treatment with the SOCIA appliance, significant improvements were observed in the ANB angle (0.61° to 2.06°, p = 0.001), SNA (81.56° to 83.26°, p = 0.006), WITS appraisal (−0.75 mm to 1.24 mm, p = 0.001), ACB angle (9.35 mm to 11.45 mm, p = 0.05), CB (64.78 mm to 65.51 mm, p = 0.03), and SNBa angle (127.57° to 129.14°, p = 0.01), as well as in overjet (0.62 mm to 3.60 mm, p = 0.001) and overbite (0.29 mm to 1.82 mm, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The SOCIA III appliance is effective in correcting pseudo-Class III malocclusion in growing patients by improving skeletal and dentoalveolar relationships. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop