Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Mogollon Highlands

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 1176 KiB  
Article
Vertebrate Skeletal Remains as Paleohydrologic Proxies: Complex Hydrologic Setting in the Upper Cretaceous Kaiparowits Formation
by Daigo Yamamura and Celina Suarez
Geosciences 2025, 15(7), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15070262 - 8 Jul 2025
Viewed by 780
Abstract
The Kaiparowits Formation preserves one of the best fossil records of Cretaceous North America, which provides great insight into the paleoecology. In an effort to investigate the paleohydrology of the Kaiparowits Formation, stable isotope compositions (δ13C, δ18O-carbonate, δ18 [...] Read more.
The Kaiparowits Formation preserves one of the best fossil records of Cretaceous North America, which provides great insight into the paleoecology. In an effort to investigate the paleohydrology of the Kaiparowits Formation, stable isotope compositions (δ13C, δ18O-carbonate, δ18O-phosphate) of 41 hadrosaur teeth, 27 crocodile teeth, and 35 turtle shell fragments were analyzed. The mean O-isotope compositions of drinking water (δ18Ow) calculated from the O-isotope of bioapatite (phosphate-δ18Op) are −13.76 ± 2.08‰ (SMOW) for hadrosaur, −8.88 ± 2.76‰ (SMOW) for crocodile, and −10.14 ± 2.62‰ (SMOW) for turtle, which strongly reflect niche partitioning. The Kaiparowits formation does not fit the global trend in isotopic compositions of vertebrate skeletal remains from previous studies, which suggests a unique hydrological setting of the Kaiparowits basin. High-elevation runoff from the Mogollon Highlands and sea level fluctuation may have contributed to such a unique paleohydrology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Palaeontology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 21200 KiB  
Article
An Ecoregional Conservation Assessment for Forests and Woodlands of the Mogollon Highlands Ecoregion, Northcentral Arizona and Southwestern New Mexico, USA
by Dominick A. DellaSala, Andréa L. Kuchy, Marni Koopman, Kurt Menke, Thomas L. Fleischner and M. Lisa Floyd
Land 2023, 12(12), 2112; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12122112 - 27 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2863
Abstract
The Mogollon Highlands, Arizona/New Mexico, USA, spans a large biogeographical region of 11 biotic communities, 63 land cover types, and 7 ecoregions. This 11.3 M ha region has high levels of beta diversity across topo-edaphic gradients that span deserts to mountain tops. The [...] Read more.
The Mogollon Highlands, Arizona/New Mexico, USA, spans a large biogeographical region of 11 biotic communities, 63 land cover types, and 7 ecoregions. This 11.3 M ha region has high levels of beta diversity across topo-edaphic gradients that span deserts to mountain tops. The main stressors affecting the region’s forests and woodlands include climate change, livestock grazing, and frequent mechanical removals of large amounts of forest biomass for fire concerns. We present an ecoregion conservation assessment for robust conservation area design that factors in appropriate wildfire response to protect communities from increasing threats of climate-induced wildfires spreading into urban areas. We focused mainly on maintaining connectivity for endangered focal species (grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) and Mexican wolf (Canis lupus baileyi)) along with protecting mature and old-growth (MOG) forests, Piñon (Pinus spp.)–Juniper (Juniperus spp.) Woodlands, and riparian areas. Over half the region is managed by federal agencies where new protected areas can be integrated with tribal co-management and prescribed burning, defensible space, and home hardening to protect communities from the growing threat of climate-induced wildfires. However, just 9% of the study area is currently protected, and even with the inclusion of proposed protected areas, only 24% would be protected, which is below 30 × 30 targets. The potential grizzly bear habitat, wolf habitat connectivity, and MOG forests (1.6 M ha (14.2%) of the study area; 18% protected) are concentrated mainly in the central and eastern portions of the MHE. There were 824 fires (2 to 228,065 ha) from 1984–2021, with 24% overlapping the wildland–urban interface. Regional temperatures have increased by 1.5 °C, with a 16% reduction in precipitation and stream flow since 1970 that under worst-case emission scenarios may increase temperatures another 3 to 8 °C by the century’s end. The unique biodiversity of the MHE can be better maintained in a rapidly changing climate via at least a three-fold increase in protected areas, co-management of focal species with tribes, and strategic use of fuel treatments nearest communities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Land, Biodiversity, and Human Wellbeing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop