Search Results (2)

This study examines the relevance of the Fraud Pentagon Theory in detecting fraudulent financial reporting among companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. While financial reporting is essential for informed stakeholder decisions, requiring information to be accurate, reliable, and fairly presented and pressure to meet expectations can lead to manipulation. The Fraud Pentagon Theory identifies five potential drivers of such behavior: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, and arrogance. This research contributes to the literature by empirically testing the theory in the Romanian context, an emerging market with limited prior analysis, using a sample of 62 listed companies over the 2017–2021 period. Regression analysis was applied, using the Dechow F-score, which combines accrual quality and financial performance to assess the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. The findings reveal that not all dimensions of the theory significantly affect the likelihood of fraudulent reporting. Specifically, pressure-related factors (financial performance and financial stability) were found to be statistically significant, while external pressure, opportunity (external auditor quality and nature of industry), rationalization (change of auditor), capability (change of director), and arrogance (number of CEO’s pictures) did not show significant influence in the Romanian framework. These results highlight the importance of contextual factors such as market structure, governance practices, and stakeholder expectations, suggesting that fraudulent reporting risk indicators may vary across different economic environments. Full article

The fraud triangle has long served as a fundamental model for understanding corporate fraud, emphasizing opportunity, pressure, and rationalization. Over time, this framework evolved with the fraud diamond, which introduced capability; the fraud pentagon, which added arrogance; and the fraud hexagon, which incorporated collusion and reshaped arrogance. Building on these developments, this study proposes a seventh dimension: the pleasure and thrill of risk-taking. This psychological factor highlights the gratification that some individuals derive from engaging in fraud as a high-stakes game. Through a qualitative analysis of five major corporate fraud cases—Société Générale, Enron, Wirecard, Parmalat, and Theranos—this study highlights the presence of this additional motivational factor. By introducing the fraud polygon, this research provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding corporate fraud’s multifaceted nature. This model has significant implications for both academic research and practical fraud prevention, offering insights into the interplay between systemic vulnerabilities and intrinsic motivations. Full article