Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Cedar henipavirus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 14004 KiB  
Article
Ephrin B1 and B2 Mediate Cedar Virus Entry into Egyptian Fruit Bat Cells
by Lea Lenhard, Martin Müller, Sandra Diederich, Lisa Loerzer, Virginia Friedrichs, Bernd Köllner, Stefan Finke, Anca Dorhoi and Gang Pei
Viruses 2025, 17(4), 573; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17040573 - 16 Apr 2025
Viewed by 755
Abstract
Cedar virus (CedV), closely related to the Hendra and Nipah viruses, is a novel Henipavirus that was originally isolated from flying foxes in Australia in 2012. Although its glycoprotein G exhibits relatively low sequence similarity with its counterparts of the Hendra and Nipah [...] Read more.
Cedar virus (CedV), closely related to the Hendra and Nipah viruses, is a novel Henipavirus that was originally isolated from flying foxes in Australia in 2012. Although its glycoprotein G exhibits relatively low sequence similarity with its counterparts of the Hendra and Nipah viruses, CedV also uses ephrin receptors, i.e., ephrins B1, B2, A2 and A5, to enters human cells. Nevertheless, the entry mechanism of CedV into bat cells remains unexplored. Considering that Rousettus aegyptiacus (Egyptian Rousette bat, ERB) is postulated to be a reservoir host for henipaviruses, we aim to reveal the receptors utilized by CedV to enable its entry into ERB cells. To this end, we cloned the class A and B ephrins of ERB and generated CHO-K1 cells stably expressing individual ephrins. We also developed a lentivirus-based pseudovirus system containing the firefly luciferase reporter. Assessment of the luciferase activity in cells expressing single ephrins demonstrated that the ERB ephrin B1 and B2 mediated CedV pseudovirus entry. Further, we generated a recombinant CedV expressing the fluorescent protein TurboFP635 (rCedV-nTurbo635). By performing high-content microscopy and flow cytometry, we unveiled that, in addition to ephrin B1 and B2, ephrin A5 was also able to mediate rCedV-nTurbo635 entry, although to a much lesser extent. In contrast to human ephrin A2, ERB ephrin A2 failed to mediate rCedV-nTurbo635 entry. Finally, we generated ERB epithelial cells with ephrin B1 and/or ephrin B2 knockdown (KD). The entry of rCedV-nTurbo635 into ERB epithelial cells was drastically impaired by ephrin B1/B2 KD, validating the importance of ephrin B1 and B2 in its entry. Altogether, we conclude that CedV primarily employs ERB ephrin B1, B2 and, possibly, A5 for its entry into ERB cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antiviral Immune Responses of Bat)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2304 KiB  
Article
Rousettus aegyptiacus Fruit Bats Do Not Support Productive Replication of Cedar Virus upon Experimental Challenge
by Björn-Patrick Mohl, Sandra Diederich, Kerstin Fischer and Anne Balkema-Buschmann
Viruses 2024, 16(9), 1359; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16091359 - 26 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1861
Abstract
Cedar henipavirus (CedV), which was isolated from the urine of pteropodid bats in Australia, belongs to the genus Henipavirus in the family of Paramyxoviridae. It is closely related to the Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV), which have been classified at [...] Read more.
Cedar henipavirus (CedV), which was isolated from the urine of pteropodid bats in Australia, belongs to the genus Henipavirus in the family of Paramyxoviridae. It is closely related to the Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV), which have been classified at the highest biosafety level (BSL4) due to their high pathogenicity for humans. Meanwhile, CedV is apathogenic for humans and animals. As such, it is often used as a model virus for the highly pathogenic henipaviruses HeV and NiV. In this study, we challenged eight Rousettus aegyptiacus fruit bats of different age groups with CedV in order to assess their age-dependent susceptibility to a CedV infection. Upon intranasal inoculation, none of the animals developed clinical signs, and only trace amounts of viral RNA were detectable at 2 days post-inoculation in the upper respiratory tract and the kidney as well as in oral and anal swab samples. Continuous monitoring of the body temperature and locomotion activity of four animals, however, indicated minor alterations in the challenged animals, which would have remained unnoticed otherwise. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Zoonotic Paramyxoviruses)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 7004 KiB  
Article
A Recombinant Chimeric Cedar Virus-Based Surrogate Neutralization Assay Platform for Pathogenic Henipaviruses
by Moushimi Amaya, Randy Yin, Lianying Yan, Viktoriya Borisevich, Bishwo N. Adhikari, Andrew Bennett, Francisco Malagon, Regina Z. Cer, Kimberly A. Bishop-Lilly, Antony S. Dimitrov, Robert W. Cross, Thomas W. Geisbert and Christopher C. Broder
Viruses 2023, 15(5), 1077; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15051077 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3962
Abstract
The henipaviruses, Nipah virus (NiV), and Hendra virus (HeV) can cause fatal diseases in humans and animals, whereas Cedar virus is a nonpathogenic henipavirus. Here, using a recombinant Cedar virus (rCedV) reverse genetics platform, the fusion (F) and attachment (G) glycoprotein genes of [...] Read more.
The henipaviruses, Nipah virus (NiV), and Hendra virus (HeV) can cause fatal diseases in humans and animals, whereas Cedar virus is a nonpathogenic henipavirus. Here, using a recombinant Cedar virus (rCedV) reverse genetics platform, the fusion (F) and attachment (G) glycoprotein genes of rCedV were replaced with those of NiV-Bangladesh (NiV-B) or HeV, generating replication-competent chimeric viruses (rCedV-NiV-B and rCedV-HeV), both with and without green fluorescent protein (GFP) or luciferase protein genes. The rCedV chimeras induced a Type I interferon response and utilized only ephrin-B2 and ephrin-B3 as entry receptors compared to rCedV. The neutralizing potencies of well-characterized cross-reactive NiV/HeV F and G specific monoclonal antibodies against rCedV-NiV-B-GFP and rCedV-HeV-GFP highly correlated with measurements obtained using authentic NiV-B and HeV when tested in parallel by plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT). A rapid, high-throughput, and quantitative fluorescence reduction neutralization test (FRNT) using the GFP-encoding chimeras was established, and monoclonal antibody neutralization data derived by FRNT highly correlated with data derived by PRNT. The FRNT assay could also measure serum neutralization titers from henipavirus G glycoprotein immunized animals. These rCedV chimeras are an authentic henipavirus-based surrogate neutralization assay that is rapid, cost-effective, and can be utilized outside high containment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viruses and Bats 2023)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3503 KiB  
Article
Functional Analysis of the Fusion and Attachment Glycoproteins of Mojiang Henipavirus
by Sofia Cheliout Da Silva, Lianying Yan, Ha V. Dang, Kai Xu, Jonathan H. Epstein, David Veesler and Christopher C. Broder
Viruses 2021, 13(3), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030517 - 22 Mar 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 5673
Abstract
Mojiang virus (MojV) is the first henipavirus identified in a rodent and known only by sequence data, whereas all other henipaviruses have been isolated from bats (Hendra virus, Nipah virus, Cedar virus) or discovered by sequence data from material of bat origin (Ghana [...] Read more.
Mojiang virus (MojV) is the first henipavirus identified in a rodent and known only by sequence data, whereas all other henipaviruses have been isolated from bats (Hendra virus, Nipah virus, Cedar virus) or discovered by sequence data from material of bat origin (Ghana virus). Ephrin-B2 and -B3 are entry receptors for Hendra and Nipah viruses, but Cedar virus can utilize human ephrin-B1, -B2, -A2 and -A5 and mouse ephrin-A1. However, the entry receptor for MojV remains unknown, and its species tropism is not well characterized. Here, we utilized recombinant full-length and soluble forms of the MojV fusion (F) and attachment (G) glycoproteins in membrane fusion and receptor tropism studies. MojV F and G were functionally competent and mediated cell–cell fusion in primate and rattine cells, albeit with low levels and slow fusion kinetics. Although a relative instability of the pre-fusion conformation of a soluble form of MojV F was observed, MojV F displayed significantly greater fusion activity when heterotypically paired with Ghana virus G. An exhaustive investigation of A- and B-class ephrins indicated that none serve as a primary receptor for MojV. The MojV cell fusion phenotype is therefore likely the result of receptor restriction rather than functional defects in recombinant MojV F and G glycoproteins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4676 KiB  
Article
Importance of Endocytosis for the Biological Activity of Cedar Virus Fusion Protein
by Kerstin Fischer, Martin H. Groschup and Sandra Diederich
Cells 2020, 9(9), 2054; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9092054 - 8 Sep 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3828
Abstract
Endocytosis plays a particular role in the proteolytic activation of highly pathogenic henipaviruses Hendra (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) fusion (F) protein precursors. These proteins require endocytic uptake from the cell surface to be cleaved by cellular proteases within the endosomal compartment, followed [...] Read more.
Endocytosis plays a particular role in the proteolytic activation of highly pathogenic henipaviruses Hendra (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) fusion (F) protein precursors. These proteins require endocytic uptake from the cell surface to be cleaved by cellular proteases within the endosomal compartment, followed by recycling to the plasma membrane for incorporation into budding virions or mediation of cell-cell fusion. This internalization largely depends on a tyrosine-based consensus motif for endocytosis present in the cytoplasmic tail of HeV and NiV F. Given the large number of tyrosine residues present in the F protein cytoplasmic domain of Cedar virus (CedV), a closely related but low pathogenic henipavirus, we aimed to investigate whether CedV F protein undergoes signal-mediated endocytosis from the cell surface controlled by tyrosine-based motifs present in its cytoplasmic tail and whether endocytosis is relevant for its biological activity. Therefore, tyrosine-based signals were mutated, and mutations were assessed for their effect on F cell surface expression, endocytosis, and biological activity. A membrane-proximal YXXΦ motif and a C-terminal di-tyrosine motif are of particular importance for cell surface expression and endocytosis rate. Furthermore, our data strongly indicate the pivotal role of endocytosis for the biological activity of the CedV F protein. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Biology of Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1889 KiB  
Article
Differential Innate Immune Responses Elicited by Nipah Virus and Cedar Virus Correlate with Disparate In Vivo Pathogenesis in Hamsters
by Tony Schountz, Corey Campbell, Kaitlyn Wagner, Joel Rovnak, Cynthia Martellaro, Blair L DeBuysscher, Heinz Feldmann and Joseph Prescott
Viruses 2019, 11(3), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/v11030291 - 22 Mar 2019
Cited by 45 | Viewed by 6753
Abstract
Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) are a pathogenesis model for the Nipah virus (NiV), and we sought to determine if they are also susceptible to the Cedar virus (CedPV). Following intranasal inoculation with CedPV, virus replication occurred in the lungs and spleens [...] Read more.
Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) are a pathogenesis model for the Nipah virus (NiV), and we sought to determine if they are also susceptible to the Cedar virus (CedPV). Following intranasal inoculation with CedPV, virus replication occurred in the lungs and spleens of infected hamsters, a neutralizing antibody was produced in some hamsters within 8 days post-challenge, and no conspicuous signs of disease occurred. CedPV replicated to a similar magnitude as NiV-Bangladesh in type I IFN-deficient BHK-21 Syrian hamster fibroblasts but replicated 4 logs lower in type I IFN-competent primary Syrian hamster and human pulmonary endothelial cells, a principal target of henipaviruses. The coinfection of these cells with CedPV and NiV failed to rescue CedPV titers and did not diminish NiV titers, suggesting the replication machinery is virus-specific. Type I IFN response transcripts Ifna7, Ddx58, Stat1, Stat2, Ccl5, Cxcl10, Isg20, Irf7, and Iigp1 were all significantly elevated in CedPV-infected hamster endothelial cells, whereas Ifna7 and Iigp1 expression were significantly repressed during NiV infection. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that CedPV’s inability to counter the host type I IFN response may, in part, contribute to its lack of pathogenicity. Because NiV causes a fatal disease in Syrian hamsters with similarities to human disease, this model will provide valuable information about the pathogenic mechanisms of henipaviruses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viruses and Bats 2019)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1451 KiB  
Review
Henipavirus Infections: Lessons from Animal Models
by Kévin P. Dhondt and Branka Horvat
Pathogens 2013, 2(2), 264-287; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens2020264 - 9 Apr 2013
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 10677
Abstract
The Henipavirus genus contains two highly lethal viruses, the Hendra and Nipah viruses and one, recently discovered, apparently nonpathogenic member; Cedar virus. These three, negative-sense single-stranded RNA viruses, are hosted by fruit bats and use EphrinB2 receptors for entry into cells. The Hendra [...] Read more.
The Henipavirus genus contains two highly lethal viruses, the Hendra and Nipah viruses and one, recently discovered, apparently nonpathogenic member; Cedar virus. These three, negative-sense single-stranded RNA viruses, are hosted by fruit bats and use EphrinB2 receptors for entry into cells. The Hendra and Nipah viruses are zoonotic pathogens that emerged in the middle of 90s and have caused severe, and often fatal, neurologic and/or respiratory diseases in both humans and different animals; including spillover into equine and porcine species. Development of relevant models is critical for a better understanding of viral pathogenesis, generating new diagnostic tools, and assessing anti-viral therapeutics and vaccines. This review summarizes available data on several animal models where natural and/or experimental infection has been demonstrated; including pteroid bats, horses, pigs, cats, hamsters, guinea pigs, ferrets, and nonhuman primates. It recapitulates the principal features of viral pathogenesis in these animals and current knowledge on anti-viral immune responses. Lastly it describes the recently characterized murine animal model, which provides the possibility to use numerous and powerful tools available for mice to further decipher henipaviruses immunopathogenesis, prophylaxis, and treatment. The utility of different models to analyze important aspects of henipaviruses-induced disease in humans, potential routes of transmission, and therapeutic approaches are equally discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogen Infection Models)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop