Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = COVID-19 orthopaedic

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1533 KB  
Article
Identifying the Patterns of Orthopaedic Trauma During the Victorian COVID-19 Lockdowns: An Interrupted Time Series Study
by Lucas R. Neumaier, Joanna F. Dipnall, Susan Liew and Belinda J. Gabbe
Trauma Care 2025, 5(2), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare5020005 - 22 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1108
Abstract
Objectives: this study aimed to compare the admission volume and characteristics of patients with traumatic orthopaedic injuries before, during, between, and after the COVID-19 lockdowns in metropolitan Victoria, Australia. Methods: A multi-centre, registry-based cohort study with an interrupted time series analysis was conducted [...] Read more.
Objectives: this study aimed to compare the admission volume and characteristics of patients with traumatic orthopaedic injuries before, during, between, and after the COVID-19 lockdowns in metropolitan Victoria, Australia. Methods: A multi-centre, registry-based cohort study with an interrupted time series analysis was conducted using data from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR) for patients with a date of injury from January 2017 to June 2022. Weekly admission volume, injury event characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes were analysed before, during, between, and after the two periods of COVID-19 lockdowns in metropolitan Melbourne (i.e., five periods). Results: During the first week of lockdown in Victoria (L1), the number of weekly orthopaedic trauma admissions declined by 24% relative to the preceding week, IRR 0.76 (95%CI 0.67, 0.87). However, the volume of admissions during the subsequent lockdown (L2) approximated pre-COVID levels. An immediate increase in orthopaedic trauma admissions occurred during the intermission (time between lockdowns) and post-COVID periods by 33% and 20%, respectively, compared to the preceding week. During periods of lockdown, patients were older (61 versus 58 years old), and a higher proportion were injured at home (38% versus 28%); fewer due to motor vehicle collisions (8% versus 11%). The pattern of injury by intent, body region injured, injury severity, and in-hospital mortality were unchanged. Conclusions: the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on the volume and characteristics of hospitalised orthopaedic trauma was not uniform across consecutive lockdowns, but favoured injuries that occurred at home. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 214 KB  
Article
High Levels of Incidental COVID-19 Infection in Emergency Urology Admissions: A Propensity Score-Matched Real World Data Analysis across Surgical Specialties
by Alex Qinyang Liu, Eric Ka-Ho Choy, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Chi-Hang Yee, Chi-Fai Ng and Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Viruses 2024, 16(9), 1402; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16091402 - 31 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1652
Abstract
Background: An incidental COVID-19 infection is often found in patients admitted for non-COVID-19-related conditions. This study aims to investigate the incidence of COVID-19 infections across surgical specialties including urology, general surgery, and orthopaedic surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study based on [...] Read more.
Background: An incidental COVID-19 infection is often found in patients admitted for non-COVID-19-related conditions. This study aims to investigate the incidence of COVID-19 infections across surgical specialties including urology, general surgery, and orthopaedic surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study based on a territory-wide electronic database in Hong Kong. All emergency in-hospital admissions under the urology, general surgery, and orthopaedic surgery divisions in the public healthcare system in Hong Kong from January to September 2022 were included. All patients were routinely screened for SARS-CoV-2, based on admission protocols during the investigation period. Baseline characteristics were retrieved, with 1:1:1 propensity score matching being performed. Incidental COVID-19 rates were then compared across specialties. Results: A total of 126,034 patients were included. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics were well balanced, and 8535 patients in each group were analysed. Urology admission was noted to have a statistically significant higher incidence of incidental COVID-19 at 9.3%, compared to general surgery (5.4%) or orthopaedic surgery (5.6%). Amongst urology patients with incidental COVID-19 infection, 35.8% were admitted for retention of urine, 27.9% for haematuria, and 8.6% for a urinary tract infection. Conclusions: This large-scale cohort study demonstrated that incidental COVID-19 rates differ between surgical specialties, with urology having the highest proportion of incidental COVID-19 infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 Complications and Co-infections)
12 pages, 870 KB  
Article
Nursing Leadership in a Post-Pandemic Elective Orthopaedic Theatre Department: A Detailed Thematic Analysis of an Open-Ended Qualitative Survey
by Carlo Biz, Lisa Buffon, Davide Scapinello, Sean Semple, Elisa Belluzzi, Ron Batash and Pietro Ruggieri
Nurs. Rep. 2024, 14(3), 1541-1552; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14030116 - 24 Jun 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2242
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted nursing theatre staff, departmental activity, and delivery of services to patients. This work-based project aimed to investigate the challenges of nursing leadership in an elective orthopaedic department at current times. Methods: The study collected qualitative data exploring [...] Read more.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted nursing theatre staff, departmental activity, and delivery of services to patients. This work-based project aimed to investigate the challenges of nursing leadership in an elective orthopaedic department at current times. Methods: The study collected qualitative data exploring theatre staff’s expectations from leadership, offering insight on how the pandemic has influenced the way of working and exploring how the future in this unit may look. The answers from 20 practitioners to an anonymised open-ended survey were examined using thematic analysis. Results: The participants described a leader as a good communicator who focuses on empowering others and supporting the team, identified by the majority as a senior team member. From the findings, three topics were identified: immediate changes, delayed changes, and pre-existing conditions. The answers painted a reality that is complex and multifaceted, where numerous variables play a part in the physical and mental health of each candidate, impacting their performance as well as their work/life balance. Overall, the strongest subjects recurring in the findings were the need for nursing leadership to focus on supporting staff with training opportunities, to actively plan for a reduction in staffing shortages, and to be constantly mindful of staff well-being. Conclusions: This study pointed out that the need for constant communication with their staff, building honest relationships, and being a reliable leader, focused on empowering others and supporting the team were important factors for the nursing management during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-COVID-19 era. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Nursing Care)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 1533 KB  
Case Report
Corynebacterium striatum Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection: An Uncommon Pathogen of Concern?
by Athanasios Galanis, Spyridon Karampitianis, John Vlamis, Panagiotis Karampinas, Michail Vavourakis, Christos Vlachos, Eftychios Papagrigorakis, Dimitrios Zachariou, Evangelos Sakellariou, Iordanis Varsamos, Christos Patilas, Sofia Tsiplakou, Vasiliki Papaioannou and Spyridon Kamariotis
Healthcare 2024, 12(2), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12020273 - 21 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2564
Abstract
Background: Total hip arthroplasty is indubitably a dominant elective surgery in orthopaedics, contributing to prodigious improvement in the quality of life of patients with osteoarthritis. One of the most potentially devastating complications of this operation is periprosthetic joint infection. Immunocompromised patients might be [...] Read more.
Background: Total hip arthroplasty is indubitably a dominant elective surgery in orthopaedics, contributing to prodigious improvement in the quality of life of patients with osteoarthritis. One of the most potentially devastating complications of this operation is periprosthetic joint infection. Immunocompromised patients might be afflicted by infrequent low-virulence organisms not typically detected with conventional procedures. Consequently, employing advanced identification methods, such as the circumstantial sonication of orthopaedic implants, could be crucial to managing such cases. Case Presentation: We present a peculiar case of a 72-year-old female patient suffering from a chronic periprosthetic hip infection due to Corynebacterium striatum. The pathogen was only identified after rigorous sonication of the extracted implants. The overall management of this case was immensely exacting, primarily because of the patient’s impaired immune system, and was finally treated with two-stage revision in our Institution. Literature Review: Although copious literature exists concerning managing periprosthetic hip infections, no concrete guidelines are available for such infections in multimorbid or immunocompromised patients with rare low-virulence microorganisms. Hence, a diagnostic work-up, antibiotic treatment and appropriate revision timeline must be determined. Sonication of extracted implants could be a powerful tool in the diagnostic arsenal, as it can aid in identifying rare microbes, such as Corynebacterium spp. Pertinent antibiotic treatment based on antibiogram analysis and apposite final revision-surgery timing are the pillars for effective therapy of such infections. Clinical Relevance: Corynebacterium striatum has been increasingly recognized as an emerging cause of periprosthetic hip infection in the last decade. A conspicuous rise in such reports has been observed in multimorbid or immunocompromised patients after the COVID-19 pandemic. This case is the first report of Corynebacterium striatum periprosthetic hip infection diagnosed solely after the sonication of extracted implants. This paper aims to increase awareness surrounding Corynebacterium spp. prosthetic joint infections, while highlighting the fields for further apposite research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1926 KB  
Article
Long- and Short-Term Trends in Outpatient Attendance by Speciality in Japan: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Asuka Takeda, Yuichi Ando and Jun Tomio
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(23), 7133; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20237133 - 1 Dec 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2672
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decline in outpatient attendance. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify long- and short-term clinic attendance trends by speciality in Japan between 2009 and 2021. A retrospective observational study of Japan’s claims between 2009 and 2021 was conducted [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decline in outpatient attendance. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify long- and short-term clinic attendance trends by speciality in Japan between 2009 and 2021. A retrospective observational study of Japan’s claims between 2009 and 2021 was conducted using the Estimated Medical Expenses Database. The number of monthly outpatient claims in clinics was used as a proxy indicator for monthly outpatient attendance, and specialities were categorised into internal medicine, paediatrics, surgery, orthopaedics, dermatology, obstetrics and gynaecology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and dentistry. The annually summarised age-standardised proportions and the percentage of change were calculated. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to evaluate long-term secular trends. The data set included 4,975,464,894 outpatient claims. A long-term statistically significant decrease was observed in outpatient attendance in internal medicine, paediatrics, surgery, ophthalmology, and otolaryngology during the pandemic. From March 2020 to December 2021, which includes the COVID-19 pandemic period, outpatient attendance in paediatrics, surgery, and otolaryngology decreased in all months compared with that of the corresponding months in 2019. For some specialities, the impact of the pandemic was substantial, even in the context of long-term trends. Speciality-specific preparedness is required to ensure essential outpatient services in future public health emergencies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health Care Sciences & Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 2201 KB  
Article
Three Years of COVID-19 on Orthopaedic Trauma; Are We Going Back to Normality?
by Vittorio Candela, Riccardo Proietti, Giuseppe Polizzotti, Marco Rionero and Stefano Gumina
Medicina 2023, 59(8), 1464; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081464 - 16 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1786
Abstract
Background and Objective: On March 2020, our country became a protected area due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The consequences of COVID-19 on trauma surgery were great. We aimed to evaluate the activity of the Trauma Centre of a highly populated suburban area over [...] Read more.
Background and Objective: On March 2020, our country became a protected area due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The consequences of COVID-19 on trauma surgery were great. We aimed to evaluate the activity of the Trauma Centre of a highly populated suburban area over 30 days starting from the first day of restrictions, to compare it with the same period of 2019 and 2022 and to evaluate whether a progressive return to normality has taken place. Materials and Methods: All patients older than 18 years managed in our Trauma Unit between 8 March 2020 and 8 April 2020 (the first COVID-19 period) were compared to the same period of 2019 (a COVID-19 free period) and 2022 (the second COVID-19 period). Clinical records were examined. Five categories of diagnoses and six mechanisms of injury were distinguished. Results: There were 1351 patients [M:719–F:632; mean age (SD):49.9 (18.7)], 451 [M:228–F:223; mean age (SD):55.9 (18.4)] and 894 [M:423–F:471;mean age (SD):54.1 (16.7)] in the COVID-19 free and in the first and second COVID-19 periods, respectively (p < 0.05). In 2020, the most significant decrease was registered for sprains/subluxations (80%); contusions decrease by 77% while fractures decrease only by 37%. The lowest reduction was found for dislocations (26%). In 2022, dislocations decreased by only 16% and both fractures and sprains decreased by about 30% with respect to the pre-pandemic period. Patients with minor trauma (contusions) were half compared to 2019. Accidental falls remain the most frequent mechanism of injury. The incidence of proximal femur, proximal humerus and distal radius fractures remained almost unchanged during both pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Conclusions: COVID-19 has markedly altered orthopaedic trauma. Injuries related to sports and high energy trauma/traffic accidents drastically reduced in 2020; however, we are slowly going back to normality: the same injuries increased in 2022 due to the progressive easing of restrictions. Elderly fractures related to accidental falls remained unchanged. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 894 KB  
Article
The Burnout and Professional Deformation of Latvian Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic at the Traumatology and Orthopaedics Hospital
by Evija Nagle, Olga Cerela-Boltunova, Solveiga Blumberga, Sandra Mihailova and Inguna Griskevica
Soc. Sci. 2023, 12(3), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030175 - 14 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3690
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, which has created an additional burden on the healthcare system and has caused enormous stress and emotional burnout among healthcare workers (HCWs). The purpose of the study is to investigate the phenomena of emotional burnout [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, which has created an additional burden on the healthcare system and has caused enormous stress and emotional burnout among healthcare workers (HCWs). The purpose of the study is to investigate the phenomena of emotional burnout and the professional deformation of HCWs. The emotional burnout phenomenon of the HCWs was studied using the Maslach Burnout Inventory–Human Services Survey. In addition, the Professional Deformation Survey, based on scientific literature and research works, was developed. The survey consisted of 4 subscales distinguishing: aggression, authoritarianism, demonstrativeness, and conservatism. The survey results showed a high level of emotional exhaustion, a medium level of depersonalization, and a low level of personal achievement reduction. The Professional Deformation Survey showed good reliability for the whole sample in all four subscales. Results of the professional deformation study revealed that 29% of respondents manifest aggression while performing their professional activities. Authoritarianism can be observed in 18% of respondents, demonstrativeness in—31%, and professional deformation manifested as conservatism in—22% of HCWs. Data obtained on burnout and the professional deformation of the HCWs proves that the healthcare system and health organizations have reason to be concerned about the mental well-being of HCWs and the quality of healthcare service provision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Work, Employment and the Labor Market)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4178 KB  
Review
Technological Advancements and Elucidation Gadgets for Healthcare Applications: An Exhaustive Methodological Review-Part-I (AI, Big Data, Block Chain, Open-Source Technologies, and Cloud Computing)
by Sridhar Siripurapu, Naresh K. Darimireddy, Abdellah Chehri, B. Sridhar and A. V. Paramkusam
Electronics 2023, 12(3), 750; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030750 - 2 Feb 2023
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4667
Abstract
In the realm of the emergence and spread of infectious diseases with pandemic potential throughout the history, plenty of pandemics (and epidemics), from the plague to AIDS (1981) and SARS (in 2003) to the bunch of COVID variants, have tormented mankind. Though plenty [...] Read more.
In the realm of the emergence and spread of infectious diseases with pandemic potential throughout the history, plenty of pandemics (and epidemics), from the plague to AIDS (1981) and SARS (in 2003) to the bunch of COVID variants, have tormented mankind. Though plenty of technological innovations are overwhelmingly progressing to curb them—a significant number of such pandemics astounded the world, impacting billions of lives and posing uncovered challenges to healthcare organizations and clinical pathologists globally. In view of addressing these limitations, a critically exhaustive review is performed to signify the prospective role of technological advancements and highlight the implicit problems associated with rendering best quality lifesaving treatments to the patient community. The proposed review work is conducted in two parts. Part 1 is essentially focused upon discussion of advanced technologies akin to artificial intelligence, Big Data, block chain technology, open-source technology, cloud computing, etc. Research works governing applicability of these technologies in solving many uncovered healthcare issues prominently faced by doctors and surgeons in the fields of cardiology, medicine, neurology, orthopaedics, paediatrics, gynaecology, psychiatry, plastic surgery, etc., as well as their role in curtailing the spread of numerous infectious, pathological, neurotic maladies is thrown light off. Boundary conditions and implicitly associated challenges substantiated by remedies coupled with future directions are presented at the end. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in "Networks" Section)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 576 KB  
Review
Telemedicine Interventions as an Attempt to Improve the Mental Health of Populations during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Narrative Review
by Anna Rutkowska
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(22), 14945; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214945 - 13 Nov 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3882
Abstract
Published reports indicate the need for psychological interventions and the integration of psychiatric care into crisis management plans in people with mental health issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It seems crucial to identify the root causes of the health-social-economic crisis and identify [...] Read more.
Published reports indicate the need for psychological interventions and the integration of psychiatric care into crisis management plans in people with mental health issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It seems crucial to identify the root causes of the health-social-economic crisis and identify potential opportunities for widely implemented psychological assistance. This narrative literature review aims to identify the types of interventions deployed as telemedicine-based mental health support and their effectiveness. The PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases were searched. From a total of 48 articles, 46 were analysed after removing duplicates. From these, thirty-seven records were excluded according to the inclusion criteria and nine (eight RCT and one cross-over) were assessed as full texts. The included publications were randomised clinical trials or cross-over studies focused on remote mental support interventions. In all studies, participants represented both sexes and had an average age range of 6–64. Studies included participants from seven countries and the overall number of participants in the included studies was 687. The content of these intervention programmes includes both established psychotherapeutic programmes, as well as new interventions. Remote support was implemented through three approaches: phone/video calls, mobile applications, and internet-based programs. The results of the included studies indicate a higher or equal efficacy of telemedicine interventions compared to traditional forms. The review also revealed a relatively wide range of targeted research groups: from children with social anxiety through to their caregivers; adolescents with neurological disorders; and from college students to adults with psychiatric or orthopaedic disorders. Analysis of the included papers found that telemedicine interventions show promising results as an attempt to improve population mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 931 KB  
Article
A Retrospective Study of the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Related Administrative Restrictions on Spine Surgery Practice and Outcomes in an Urban Healthcare System
by Bahar Attaripour, Selena Xiang, Brendon Mitchell, Matthew Siow, Jesal Parekh and Bahar Shahidi
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(17), 10573; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710573 - 25 Aug 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1978
Abstract
The study objective is to characterize the impact of COVID-19 related hospital administrative restrictions on patient demographics, surgical care, logistics, and patient outcomes in spine surgery. This was a retrospective study of 331 spine surgery patients at UCSD conducted during 1 March 2019–31 [...] Read more.
The study objective is to characterize the impact of COVID-19 related hospital administrative restrictions on patient demographics, surgical care, logistics, and patient outcomes in spine surgery. This was a retrospective study of 331 spine surgery patients at UCSD conducted during 1 March 2019–31 May 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 1 March 2020–31 May 2020 (first COVID-19 surge). All variables were collected through RedCap and compared between pre- and during-COVID groups. There were no significant differences in patient demographics, operating room duration, and skin-to-skin time. However, length of stay was 4.7 days shorter during COVID-19 (p = 0.03) and more cases were classified as ‘urgent’ (p = 0.04). Preoperative pain scores did not differ between groups (p = 0.51). However, pain levels at discharge were significantly higher during COVID (p = 0.04) and trended towards remaining higher in the short- (p = 0.05) but not long-term (p = 0.17) after surgery. There was no significant difference in the number of post-operative complications, but there was an increase in the use of the emergency room and telemedicine to address complications when they arose. Overall, the pandemic resulted in a greater proportion of ‘urgent’ spine surgery cases and shorter length of hospital stay. Pain levels upon discharge and at short-term timepoints were higher following surgery but did not persist in the long term. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Back and Neck Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 398 KB  
Article
Orthopedic Telemedicine Outpatient Practice Diagnoses Set during the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown—Individual Observation
by Wojciech Michał Glinkowski
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5418; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095418 - 29 Apr 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3558
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a substantial intensification of the telemedicine transformation process in orthopedics since 2020. In the light of the legal regulations introduced in Poland, from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, physicians, including orthopedic surgeons, have had the opportunity to [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a substantial intensification of the telemedicine transformation process in orthopedics since 2020. In the light of the legal regulations introduced in Poland, from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, physicians, including orthopedic surgeons, have had the opportunity to conduct specialist teleconsultations. Teleconsultations increase epidemiological safety and significantly reduce the exposure of patients and medical staff to direct transmission of the viral vector and the spread of infections. The study aimed to describe diagnoses and clinical aspects of consecutive orthopedic teleconsultations (TC) during the pandemic lockdown. The diagnoses were set according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Hybrid teleconsultations used smartphones and obligatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) with supplemental voice, SMS, MMS, Medical images, documents, and video conferencing if necessary. One hundred ninety-eight consecutive orthopedic teleconsultations were served for 615 women and 683 men (mean age 41.82 years ± 11.47 years). The most frequently diagnosed diseases were non-acute orthopedic disorders “M” (65.3%) and injuries “S” (26.3%). Back pain (M54) was the most frequent diagnosis (25.5%). Although virtual orthopedic consultation cannot replace an entire personal visit to a specialist orthopedic surgeon, in many cases, teleconsultation enables medical staff to continue to participate in providing medical services at a sufficiently high medical level to ensure patient and physician. The unified approach to TC diagnoses using ICD-10 or ICD-11 may improve further research on telemedicine-related orthopedics repeatability. Future research directions should address orthopedic teleconsultations’ practical aspects and highlight legal, organizational, and technological issues with their implementations. Full article
8 pages, 380 KB  
Article
Course of Treatment and Short-Term Outcome of Surgically Treated Paediatric Upper Limb Fractures during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Experiences of a Level 1 Trauma Centre in Central Europe
by Stephan Payr, Theresia Dangl, Andrea Schuller, Philipp Scheider, Britta Chocholka, Manuela Jaindl, Elisabeth Schwendenwein and Thomas M. Tiefenboeck
Children 2022, 9(2), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020172 - 31 Jan 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2366
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting restrictions led to a reduced number of surgeries. This study examines its impact on the course of treatment and clinical outcome of surgically treated paediatric upper limb fractures during that specific period. This retrospective cohort study evaluated [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting restrictions led to a reduced number of surgeries. This study examines its impact on the course of treatment and clinical outcome of surgically treated paediatric upper limb fractures during that specific period. This retrospective cohort study evaluated all children aged 0–18 years presenting with an upper limb fracture treated surgically at the level 1 trauma centre of the University Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of Vienna within lockdown from 16 March to 29 May 2020 (definition applied through corresponding legislation) compared to the same period from 2015 to 2019. A total number of 127 children (m:63; f:44) were included. The lockdown did not lead to a significant increase in complications during and after initial surgery. Time until removal of implant was not significantly prolonged (p = 0.068; p = 0.46). The clinical outcome did not significantly differ compared to previous years. The experience of a level 1 trauma centre showed that despite reduced surgical capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic, no negative differences concerning course of treatment and clinical outcome of surgically treated paediatric upper limb fractures were present. These findings are still of importance since the COVID-19 pandemic continues and several countries in Central Europe are currently under their fourth lockdown. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Orthopedics & Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1039 KB  
Article
The Impact of the Second Wave of COVID-19 on Outcomes in Hip Fracture Patients: An Observational Study
by Mattia Morri, Cristiana Forni, Andrea Evangelista, Tania Broggian, Elisa Ambrosi, Antonella Magli Orlandi and Annella Mingazzini
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(24), 11589; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411589 - 7 Dec 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1988
Abstract
The aim of this work was to measure the healthcare outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for femur fractures during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic within a context of orthopaedic surgery units and living with the pandemic and compare them with pre-pandemic [...] Read more.
The aim of this work was to measure the healthcare outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for femur fractures during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic within a context of orthopaedic surgery units and living with the pandemic and compare them with pre-pandemic outcomes. A retrospective observational study was conducted. The incidence of pressure ulcers and deambulation recovery time were the main outcome. The pre-pandemic group consisted of 108 patients and the second wave pandemic group included 194 patients. The incidence of pressure ulcers increased from 10% in the pre-pandemic period to 21% in the second wave (p = 0.016) and the crude relative risk (RR) was 2.06 (p = 0.023). The recovery of deambulation showed no significant difference in the recovery time in terms of days needed to walk the first time (3 days vs. 2 days; p = 0.44). During the second wave of COVID-19, the risk of pressure ulcers for patients undergoing femur fracture surgery increased significantly. This variation could be explained by the absence of a caregiver for these patients and the increased average complexity of the patients managed in the orthopaedic setting. The hospital management should take into account these aspects when restoring the hospital’s normal surgical activities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 4588 KB  
Article
Maintaining Medical Resources to Treat Paediatric Injuries during COVID-19 Lockdown Is Essential—An Epidemiological Analysis of a Level 1 Trauma Centre in Central Europe
by Stephan Payr, Andrea Schuller, Theresia Dangl, Philipp Scheider, Thomas Sator, Britta Chocholka, Manuela Jaindl, Elisabeth Schwendenwein and Thomas M. Tiefenboeck
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 5829; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115829 - 28 May 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2870
Abstract
Background: This study examined the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting decrease in the incidence of various categories of injuries, with the main focus on fractures and mild traumatic brain injuries in a paediatric population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated [...] Read more.
Background: This study examined the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting decrease in the incidence of various categories of injuries, with the main focus on fractures and mild traumatic brain injuries in a paediatric population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated all children from 0 to 18 years of age presenting with an injury at the level 1 trauma centre of the University Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery in Vienna during the lockdown from 16 March to 29 May 2020 compared to records over the same timeframe from 2015 to 2019. Results: In total, 14,707 patients with injuries were included. The lockdown did not lead to a significant decrease in fractures but, instead, yielded a highly significant increase in mild traumatic brain injuries when compared to all injuries that occurred (p = 0.082 and p = 0.0001) as well as acute injuries (excluding contusions, distortions and miscellaneous non-acute injuries) (p = 0.309 and p = 0.034). Conclusions: The percentage of paediatric fractures did not decrease at the level 1 trauma centre, and a highly significant proportional increase in paediatric patients with mild traumatic brain injuries was observed during the COVID-19 lockdown. Therefore, medical resources should be maintained to treat paediatric trauma patients and provide neurological monitoring during pandemic lockdowns. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop