Search Results (37)

This study evaluated how varying calcium silicate (30–50%) and radiopacifier (45–65%) ratios affected the physicochemical properties of experimental sealers (P1–P3) compared to Bio-C Sealer, AH Plus Bioceramic, and AH Plus Jet. Properties such as flowability, solubility, and radiopacity were assessed per ISO 6876/2012, and setting time followed ASTM C266-2008. pH and volumetric changes were measured in acrylic teeth (n = 10) filled with each sealer, with pH evaluated at 3, 24, 72, and 168 h, and volume changes assessed via micro-CT at baseline and after 7 days. P1 showed setting time similar to AH Plus Bioceramic (p > 0.05). All calcium silicate-based sealers had greater solubility than AH Plus Jet (p < 0.05), with only P3 meeting ISO standards. P1 and AH Plus Jet exhibited higher radiopacity (p < 0.05). Bio-C Sealer and AH Plus Bioceramic had more volume change than P2 (p < 0.05). All experimental sealers showed stable volume and increasing alkalinity, peaking at 72h. Bio-C Sealer showed a consistent pH rise, except between 24 and 168 h (p > 0.05). Sealer properties were strongly influenced by the composition. P1 (30% calcium silicate/65% radiopacifier) had superior flowability and radiopacity, while P3 (50% calcium silicate/45% radiopacifier) was the only one to meet solubility standards. Full article

The adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin may be influenced both by the chemical composition of the sealer and the final irrigation protocol. The aim of this study was to examine the push-out bond strength of three differently formulated bioceramic sealers to root canal dentin, after different irrigation protocols. Four cavities were prepared in dentine discs obtained from middle thirds of third molars with fused roots. Discs were randomly divided into three groups (n = 8). Group 1: specimens were immersed in 2.5% NaOCl; group 2: in 2.5% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA; and group 3: in a solution of 2.5% NaOCl with 9% etidronic acid (HEDP). The cavities on each disk were filled with four tested sealers: AH Plus Bioceramic, Bio C Angelus, BioRoot RCS, and AH Plus (n = 8 per sealer). The push-out bond strength test was performed after 7 days. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni post hoc test (α = 0.05). Irrigation with NaOCl resulted in significantly lower bond strength values of the sealers in comparison to NaOCl/EDTA and NaOCl/HEDP groups. In the NaOCl and NaOCl/HEDP groups, BioRoot RCS showed similar push-out bond strength compared to AH Plus and significantly higher compared to Bio-C and AH Plus Bioceramic. In the NaOCl/EDTA group, bioceramic sealers achieved a significantly weaker bond strength compared to AH Plus. The bond strength of BioRoot RCS was significantly higher compared to Bio-C and AH Plus Bioceramic. The irrigation protocols and the chemical composition of the sealers significantly influenced their bond strength to dentin. Epoxy resin-based sealer achieved the strongest bond strength, while within bioceramic sealers, the highest values were obtained for BioRoot RCS and the lowest for AH Plus Bioceramic. Full article

The development of bioactive materials in endodontics has advanced tissue regeneration by enhancing the biological responses of periradicular tissues. Recently, calcium silicate-based sealers have gained attention for their superior biological properties, including biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and cementogenic potential. This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and bioactivity of EndoSequence BC Sealer (ES BC) and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (AHP BC) using human periodontal ligament stromal cells (hPDLSCs). Biocompatibility was assessed using MTT, Live/Dead, and wound healing assays. ES BC and AHP BC demonstrated significantly higher cell viability and proliferation compared to AH Plus used as a control. Gene expression analysis via real-time quantitative PCR demonstrated that ES BC, especially in set form, significantly upregulated osteogenic markers—alkaline phosphatase (2.49 ± 0.10, p < 0.01), runt-related transcription factor 2 (2.33 ± 0.13), and collagen type I alpha 1 chain (2.85 ± 0.40, p < 0.001)—more than cementogenic markers (cementum protein 1, cementum attachment protein, and cementum protein 23). This differential response may reflect the fibroblast-dominant nature of hPDLSCs, which contain limited cementoblast-like cells. This study supports the superior biocompatibility and regenerative capacity of ES BC and AHP BC compared to AH Plus. While in vitro models provide foundational insights, advanced ex vivo approaches are crucial for translating findings to clinical practice. Full article

This study compared the efficacy of different solutions in achieving patency in teeth filled with AH Plus Bioceramic sealer. Eighty-five premolars with a straight canal were prepared. After sealer placement, a master gutta-percha cone was introduced 2 mm short of the working length. The teeth were stored at 37 °C and 100% humidity for five weeks before retreatment. Filling materials were removed up to the gutta-percha cone’s length. The canals were then randomly assigned to groups: G1 (control, no solution), G2 (5.25% NaOCl), G3 (17% EDTA), G4 (10% citric acid), and G5 (10% formic acid). The apical patency was attempted with a 10 K file within a period of 10 min, by a blinded operator. Additionally, sealer samples were immersed in the solutions, followed by scanning electron microscopy analysis. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. Patency was achieved in all canals except one in the control and one in the NaOCl groups. No significant differences were found in the time required to achieve patency. Acid solutions had a greater impact on the sealer’s structural integrity, and a decalcifying effect of EDTA and citric acid was registered. Apical patency in straight canals obturated with AH Plus Bioceramic sealer was consistently achieved regardless of the solution used. Full article

Calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBS) vary in chemical composition, which can influence treatment outcomes. Therefore, the study aimed at comparing several commercially available CSBS regarding microstructure and elemental characterization. Four CSBS (AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer, BioRoot RCS, BioRoot Flow, TotalFill BC Sealer) and a control resin-based sealer (AH Plus) were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRD). The specimens were analyzed after setting (SEM, EDX, XRD), as well as after 7 (SEM) and 28 days (SEM, EDX) of incubation in Hank’s balanced salt solution. AH Plus exhibited a uniform matrix and small amounts of calcium (Ca), significantly decreasing after incubation. In contrast, CSBSs exhibited crystalline forms on the surface and increased Ca content, significantly increasing after 28 days of incubation. The main crystalline phase for all tested CSBS was zirconium oxide, while for ERBS it was calcium tungstate. In conclusion, the amount of calcium increased on the surface of CSBSs after incubation, which alkalinized the pH, promoting mineralization, apatite formation, and antibacterial potential. Despite this, the formation of a hydroxyapatite layer was not demonstrated, possibly due to the high dissolution potential of CSBSs. Full article

Background: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of calcium silicate-based sealers (BioRoot RCS and MTA Fillapex) compared to an epoxy-based sealer (AH Plus). Materials and methods: The study was conducted in vitro with the cell lines HepG2 and V79 to evaluate cytotoxicity and genotoxicity using the comet and micronucleus assays. Eluates of the materials were tested at two different concentrations (3 cm²/mL and 0.5 cm²/mL) after an exposure time of 72 h. Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests (p < 0.05). Results: At lower concentrations in both cell lines, MTA Fillapex showed no significant difference in the measured comet assay parameters compared to the negative control (p > 0.05). In addition, it showed significantly lower genotoxic effects compared to AH Plus for all comet assay parameters, concentrations, and cell lines (p ≤ 0.001). BioRoot RCS showed lower primary DNA damage (p ≤ 0.001) than AH Plus, only at higher concentrations and in the HepG2 cell line. Concerning the two tested bioceramic sealers, BioRoot RCS showed higher tail intensity values compared to MTA Fillapex (p < 0.05). In contrast to the results of the comet assay, BioRoot RCS significantly reduced the number of nuclear buds and nucleoplasmic bridges in the HepG2 cell line compared to MTA Fillapex, whereas reduction in the V79 cell line was only observed for nuclear buds (p < 0.05). Both materials increased the number of apoptotic cells compared to the negative control (p < 0.05). In comparison to AH Plus, BioRoot RCS and MTA Fillapex significantly reduced the number of cells with micronuclei and increased the number of cells with undamaged chromatin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings suggest that MTA Fillapex and BioRoot RCS exhibit superior biocompatibility over AH Plus, as evidenced by their lower cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in vitro. These results support the use of calcium silicate-based sealers in clinical practice, highlighting the need for further studies to evaluate their performance in vivo and their implications for patient safety. Full article

Apical periodontitis is a common inflammatory condition associated with root canal treatment (RCT) failure. The quality of the three-dimensional root canal seal is critical to the success of the treatment. Bioceramic sealants, such as Neosealer Flo, offer biological advantages such as osteoconduction, biocompatibility and sustained calcium ion release, which may improve apical healing. The aim of this study was to compare AH Plus and Neosealer Flo in terms of postoperative pain, extrusion and periapical healing. A single-blind, randomised clinical trial was conducted with 60 patients divided into AH Plus and Neosealer Flo groups. Post-operative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 24 and 48 h and at 7 days. Seal quality and periapical healing were assessed at 6 months using the AAE success criteria by clinical and radiographic evaluation. Neosealer Flo resulted in less postoperative pain at 24 h and 7 days compared to AH Plus. Extrusion did not significantly affect pain or correlate with the type of sealer used. Both materials achieved similar periapical healing rates. Neosealer Flo demonstrated advantages in pain reduction, while both sealants showed comparable efficacy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Since biomineralization by calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs) was reported, retrieving canal filling materials may be challenging during endodontic retreatment due to their adhesion to dentin. This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of removing residual mineral deposits from two kinds of CSBSs compared to the AH Plus Jet (AHJ). Methods: Root canals of mandibular premolars were prepared, obturated with the sealer-based obturation method using a WOG medium gutta-percha cone and one of the following sealers: AHJ, AH Plus Bioceramic (AHB), and Ceraseal (CER) (n = 12/group). After 3 weeks, endodontic retreatment was conducted with the WOG files, followed by instrumentation with XP-endo Finisher (XPF). Micro-computed tomography scanning was obtained after canal filling, after retreatment with WOG, and after the use of XPF. The percentage of the removed filling volume was calculated. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test and a non-parametric test with Bonferroni’s correction were performed. Root canal dentin after retreatment was examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: After supplementary instrumentation with XPF, the mean residual filling volumes for the AHJ, AHB, and CER groups were 1.35 mm³, 0.55 mm³, and 0.82 mm³, respectively. The AHJ group showed greater residual volume compared to the AHB group (p < 0.05). The AHB and CER groups demonstrated higher mean percentages of removed filling volume at 94.8%, and 92.5%, respectively, compared to 87.1% for the AHJ group (p < 0.05). More mineral deposits were observed in the CER group with SEM. Conclusions: AHB and CER are retrievable during endodontic retreatment, with CER preferable due to greater mineral deposits in dentinal tubules. Full article

This study assessed the biocompatibility and chemical properties of two bioceramic root canal sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer (EBC) and Nishika Canal Sealer BG (NBG), using a sealer extrusion model. Eight-week-old male Wistar rats were used. The mesial root canals of the upper first molars were pulpectomized and overfilled with EBC, NBG, or, as reference, epoxy resin-based AH Plus (AHP). After 28 days, periapical tissue reactions were assessed using microcomputed tomography and histological staining. The elemental composition and chemical composition of the extruded EBC and NBG were analyzed at Day 1 and 28 using an electron probe microanalyzer and micro-Raman spectroscopy. No periapical lesions were observed with the sealer extrusion. Additionally, inflammation around the extruded EBC and NBG was minimal to mild on Day 28, whereas moderate inflammation was found around the extruded AHP. Silicon concentration in the extruded EBC and NBG decreased significantly from Day 1 to 28, with almost no silicon present on Day 28. Furthermore, the extruded EBC and NBG became calcium- and phosphorus-rich, showing a Raman band for hydroxyapatite on Day 28. In conclusion, EBC and NBG demonstrated favorable biocompatibility and the ability to release silicon elements and produce hydroxyapatite when extruded into the periapical tissues. AHP showed moderate periapical tissue irritancy. Full article

In recent decades, there has been significant growth in research focused on biocompatible materials, particularly in the field of materials science and engineering. The primary advantages of these materials are their biocompatibility, bioactivity, and antibacterial properties. Consequently, there has been a growing utilization of bioceramic sealers in the field of endodontics. This study investigated the amounts of bioactive elements in dentin in contact with the AH Plus^® Bioceramic Sealer (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany). The results were qualitatively evaluated by examining scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and elemental mapping and quantitatively by determining element weight (wt%) and atomic (at%) percentages obtained from EDX analysis. The AH Plus^® Bioceramic Sealer demonstrated notable bioactivity through its dynamic contact with dentin at the root level. Full article

Background: Adhesion within endodontic obturation material and root canal walls improves the efficacy of the endodontic treatment by establishing a barrier that inhibits reinfection and entombs residual bacteria. This study evaluates the push-out bond strength (POBS) of calcium silicate sealers compared to an epoxy-resin-based sealer. Methods: A total of 36 extracted mono-radicular teeth were prepared with Pro Taper Ultimate and irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. The specimens were randomly split into three groups (n = 12) according to the endodontic sealer and filling technique used as follows: Ah Plus with the continuous wave condensation technique (CWC), Ah Bioceramic (Ah Bio) with the single-cone technique, and Total Fill Hi-Flow (FKG Hi-Flow) with the CWC technique. The material was allowed to set for 4 weeks, and afterwards, the roots were placed in acrylic resin and sectioned into 1 mm transverse slices. A POBS test was conducted using a universal testing machine, and the mode of bond failure was assessed at 4× magnification using a stereomicroscope. Six specimens from each group were selected for SEM-EDX examination to evaluate dentinal tubule penetration. The data were analysed using analysis of variance and Tukey and Bonferroni post hoc tests. Results: The POBS tests revealed higher values for Ah Plus in comparison to both calcium silicate sealers (p < 0.001), while FKG Hi-Flow showed superior results to Ah Bio (p < 0.001). The cohesive mode of failure was prevalent in all three groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, the resin-based sealer showed higher bond strength and better dentinal tubule penetration than the two calcium silicate sealers tested, while FKG Hi-Flow outperformed AH Bio. Full article

This study compared the push-out bond strength and adaptation of the recently developed AH Plus bioceramic (AHP-Bio) root canal sealer with Bioceramic Endosequence (BC) and AH Plus (AHP) sealers when exposed to simulated body fluid for inducing bioactivity. Cross-section discs of 1 mm thick slices from obturated root canals were prepared and either kept dry or immersed in serum for 30 days. All discs were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and then subjected to a push-out test. The failure modes were also determined. The data were statistically analyzed using an ANOVA test at p < 0.05. In both environments, the BC sealer recorded the greatest bond strength, while the AHP-Bio sealer recorded the lowest mean values. However, bond strength was significantly improved after immersion in serum (p < 0.001). The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test revealed a significant difference in failure mode among the tested groups at p < 0.001. The predominant failure mode was cohesive failure in both bioceramic sealers, with the greatest value for AHP-Bio (70%), and adhesive failure for AHP/gutta-percha (60%, 80%) in both environments. SEM revealed good dentin adaptation of the three sealers, with marked decreases in gaps at the bioceramic/dentin interface after immersion in serum. In conclusion, although BC exhibited greater push-out bond strength than AHP-Bio, the latter achieved good displacement resistance that increased when the sealer was exposed to simulated body fluid (serum). Full article

Background: Using endodontic sealers with long-term antimicrobial properties can increase the success of endodontic treatment. This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial activity over time of two calcium silicate (CS)-based sealers, AH Plus Bioceramic and BioRoot RCS, and to compare them with an epoxy resin-based sealer, AH Plus Jet, against mature polymicrobial biofilms grown on human radicular dentin. Methods: The antimicrobial activity of the sealers was tested using a direct contact test after 1 and 6 weeks of contact with the biofilms. Cell viability was determined by the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) method and flow cytometry (FC). The results of the ATP test were analyzed using an ANOVA with Welch’s correction, followed by the Games–Howell test. The number of cells with damaged membranes obtained by FC in each period was compared by means of an ANOVA and Duncan’s test. For the comparison between times, a Student’s t-test was used. Results: Globally, after a week of contact, the epoxy resin-based sealer obtained the best results. However, at 6 weeks, the two CSs showed the highest antimicrobial efficacy, with a significant increase in this activity over time. Conclusions: Calcium silicate-based sealers exert long-term antimicrobial activity against endodontic biofilms. Full article

This study aimed to assess the adaptability and penetration depth capacity of recent bioceramic systems, including regular EndoSequence (BC) versus HiFlow (BCH) sealers in the presence of BC points. A total of 54 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and obturated with either the cold or warm compaction technique (n = 9), using either BC, BCH, or AH Plus (AHP) combined with BC points. The adaptation, film thickness, and gaps/voids were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The sealer/dentin interface was evaluated by Raman spectroscopy, and depth penetration was evaluated by a confocal laser scanning microscope. According to the normality test, the data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests at p < 0.05. BCH sealer showed the significantly thinnest film with the greatest flow (p > 0.001), with further improvement when subjected to the warm compaction technique. Moreover, it exhibited close adaptation with deep penetration into radicular dentin, forming a tag-like structure. The Raman spectra also indicated close contact with the dentin surface. The use of BC sealer with BC points exhibited homogenous, single-unit obturation, either with a cold or warm technique. Furthermore, the use of the warm compaction technique with BCH sealer achieved a gap-free interface associated with tag-like structures, which exhibit the monoblock phenomenon. Full article

Introduction: We compared the effects of heat on the physicochemical properties of recently developed calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs), including BioRoot Flow, BioRoot RCS, and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer, with those of the epoxy-resin-based sealer (ERBS) AH Plus. Methods: The flow, film thickness, setting time, and solubility of sealers were evaluated at 37 °C and 100 °C using ISO 6876/2012. Furthermore, pH and calcium ion release were evaluated at these temperatures. In addition, the mass change in sealers at a high temperature was assessed via thermogravimetric analysis. Then, the chemical composition and components of the sealers were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Results: BioRoot Flow, AH Plus Bioceramic, and AH Plus complied with ISO standards in terms of flow and film thickness, both before and after heat application. However, BioRoot RCS exhibited significantly increased film thickness at 100 °C. The setting times of all sealers were significantly reduced at 100 °C. The solubility of CSBS was >3%, exceeding the ISO 6876/2012 standard, both before and after heat exposure. Conversely, the solubility of AH Plus complied with the standard, regardless of the thermal condition. For 4 weeks, CSBS showed a significantly higher pH than AH Plus at both 37 °C and 100 °C. After heat treatment, calcium release decreased in Bioroot RCS and BioRoot Flow, while AH Plus showed no significant differences before and after treatment. However, CSBS consistently exhibited significantly higher calcium release than AH Plus at both temperatures. An FTIR analysis revealed that the chemical composition of the sealers did not change at the high temperature, whereas a thermogravimetric analysis demonstrated a >5% weight reduction in CSBS and a 0.005% weight reduction in AH Plus at 100 °C. Conclusions: BioRoot Flow, AH Plus Bioceramic, and AH Plus possess favorable physicochemical properties, which make them suitable for application under thermal conditions. At a high temperature, BioRoot RCS did not exhibit changes in its chemical composition. However, its film thickness was increased, and pH and solubility were reduced. Therefore, caution is needed when it is applied at high temperatures, such as during the warm obturation technique. Full article