<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/rss/journal/peacestud">
		<title>Peace Studies</title>
		<description>Latest open access articles published in Peace Stud. at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/peacestud</description>
		<link>https://www.mdpi.com/journal/peacestud</link>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/journal/peacestud"/>
		<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:support@mdpi.com"/>
		<dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY)</dc:rights>
						<prism:copyright>MDPI</prism:copyright>
		<prism:rightsAgent>support@mdpi.com</prism:rightsAgent>
		<image rdf:resource="https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo.png?13cf3b5bd783e021?1783907519"/>
				<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/7" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/6" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/5" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/4" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/3" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/2" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/1" />
                    	</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
				<cc:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" />
	</channel>

        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/7">

	<title>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 7: A Political Ceiling on Escalation: Peace Governance and Non-Aligned Mediation in the 1962 India&amp;ndash;China Crisis</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/7</link>
	<description>This article examines the Colombo Conference Proposals of December 1962 as an instance of non-aligned mediation in the aftermath of the India&amp;amp;ndash;China border war. Based on a close reading of the Proposals and related diplomatic materials, it argues that the initiative did not seek to resolve the dispute but to structure restraint through ceasefire consolidation, disengagement, and demilitarized arrangements. In doing so, it conceptualized peace as a form of procedural governance&amp;amp;mdash;a political ceiling on escalation rather than a comprehensive settlement. Situating the case within existing scholarship on mediation, failed peace processes, and middle-power diplomacy, this article shows how non-aligned states contributed to conflict management through appeal, regional legitimacy, and sovereign consent. The Colombo episode illustrates both the possibilities and limits of such mediation: it could shape conduct and contain escalation, but it remained dependent on voluntary compliance and shared interpretation.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-05-08</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 7: A Political Ceiling on Escalation: Peace Governance and Non-Aligned Mediation in the 1962 India&amp;ndash;China Crisis</b></p>
	<p>Peace Studies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/7">doi: 10.3390/peacestud1020007</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Nishant Upadhyay
		</p>
	<p>This article examines the Colombo Conference Proposals of December 1962 as an instance of non-aligned mediation in the aftermath of the India&amp;amp;ndash;China border war. Based on a close reading of the Proposals and related diplomatic materials, it argues that the initiative did not seek to resolve the dispute but to structure restraint through ceasefire consolidation, disengagement, and demilitarized arrangements. In doing so, it conceptualized peace as a form of procedural governance&amp;amp;mdash;a political ceiling on escalation rather than a comprehensive settlement. Situating the case within existing scholarship on mediation, failed peace processes, and middle-power diplomacy, this article shows how non-aligned states contributed to conflict management through appeal, regional legitimacy, and sovereign consent. The Colombo episode illustrates both the possibilities and limits of such mediation: it could shape conduct and contain escalation, but it remained dependent on voluntary compliance and shared interpretation.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>A Political Ceiling on Escalation: Peace Governance and Non-Aligned Mediation in the 1962 India&amp;amp;ndash;China Crisis</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Nishant Upadhyay</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/peacestud1020007</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Peace Studies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-05-08</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Peace Studies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/peacestud1020007</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/7</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/6">

	<title>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 6: Gandhi&amp;rsquo;s Homespun Pluralism: Toward the Goal of Sarvodaya (Uplift of All) and Sustainable Peace</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/6</link>
	<description>Mohandas K. Gandhi (popularly known as Mahatma Gandhi) has primarily been recognized for his work in developing the theory and practice of nonviolence (ahimsa) for the purpose of building a culture of sustainable peace. Although Gandhi&amp;amp;rsquo;s writings do not explicitly engage such categories as negative and positive peace, peace and international relations, or pacifism and nonviolence, scholars in peace studies have nonetheless assessed his contributions to the evolution of the field. This article advances the study of peace by emphasizing the dynamic nature of nonviolence (ahimsa), which is inextricably connected to Gandhi&amp;amp;rsquo;s vision of sarvodaya (uplift of all). It further argues that his approach to peacebuilding, grounded in the upholding of pluralism across civic life, offers a conceptual framework for disrupting hegemonic monolithic systems. Gandhi lived in a time when the concept of pluralism had not gained currency; however, his vision, rooted in the values of diversity and tolerance, can appropriately be understood under the now widely accepted concept of pluralism. Gandhi thus uniquely connected nonviolence, peace, pluralism, and sarvodaya. For him, peaceful co-existence mandates attention to diversity&amp;amp;mdash;an approach that can enrich contemporary conversations in a divided political, social, and religious landscape. As a political leader and social reformer, he promoted indigenous languages, diverse village industries, local economies, and multi-faith religious education. In his later life, he also advocated for inter-caste and interreligious marriages in order to mitigate communal tensions. Such attention to diversity offers a promising path toward realizing the goal of sustainable peace and sarvodaya in a contemporary landscape increasingly prone to monolithic systems. Sarvodaya inherently requires a commitment to pluralistic, dialogical, dialectical, and nonviolent engagement in all spheres of life. By emphasizing shared humanity and committing to diversity, Gandhi offers a social philosophy of respect for all life as well as uplift of all trades, languages, and belief systems grounded in the vision of welfare of all. His practical methods of engaging diverse actors, along with his radical efforts to disrupt autocratic, authoritative, and centralized systems, affirm that the objectives of sarvodaya and sustainable peace can be realized only through a radical pluralism.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-04-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 6: Gandhi&amp;rsquo;s Homespun Pluralism: Toward the Goal of Sarvodaya (Uplift of All) and Sustainable Peace</b></p>
	<p>Peace Studies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/6">doi: 10.3390/peacestud1020006</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Veena R. Howard
		</p>
	<p>Mohandas K. Gandhi (popularly known as Mahatma Gandhi) has primarily been recognized for his work in developing the theory and practice of nonviolence (ahimsa) for the purpose of building a culture of sustainable peace. Although Gandhi&amp;amp;rsquo;s writings do not explicitly engage such categories as negative and positive peace, peace and international relations, or pacifism and nonviolence, scholars in peace studies have nonetheless assessed his contributions to the evolution of the field. This article advances the study of peace by emphasizing the dynamic nature of nonviolence (ahimsa), which is inextricably connected to Gandhi&amp;amp;rsquo;s vision of sarvodaya (uplift of all). It further argues that his approach to peacebuilding, grounded in the upholding of pluralism across civic life, offers a conceptual framework for disrupting hegemonic monolithic systems. Gandhi lived in a time when the concept of pluralism had not gained currency; however, his vision, rooted in the values of diversity and tolerance, can appropriately be understood under the now widely accepted concept of pluralism. Gandhi thus uniquely connected nonviolence, peace, pluralism, and sarvodaya. For him, peaceful co-existence mandates attention to diversity&amp;amp;mdash;an approach that can enrich contemporary conversations in a divided political, social, and religious landscape. As a political leader and social reformer, he promoted indigenous languages, diverse village industries, local economies, and multi-faith religious education. In his later life, he also advocated for inter-caste and interreligious marriages in order to mitigate communal tensions. Such attention to diversity offers a promising path toward realizing the goal of sustainable peace and sarvodaya in a contemporary landscape increasingly prone to monolithic systems. Sarvodaya inherently requires a commitment to pluralistic, dialogical, dialectical, and nonviolent engagement in all spheres of life. By emphasizing shared humanity and committing to diversity, Gandhi offers a social philosophy of respect for all life as well as uplift of all trades, languages, and belief systems grounded in the vision of welfare of all. His practical methods of engaging diverse actors, along with his radical efforts to disrupt autocratic, authoritative, and centralized systems, affirm that the objectives of sarvodaya and sustainable peace can be realized only through a radical pluralism.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Gandhi&amp;amp;rsquo;s Homespun Pluralism: Toward the Goal of Sarvodaya (Uplift of All) and Sustainable Peace</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Veena R. Howard</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/peacestud1020006</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Peace Studies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-04-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Peace Studies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/peacestud1020006</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/2/6</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/5">

	<title>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 5: Navigating the Indus Waters Treaty and Peacebuilding: The Growing Case of Strategic Militarization in Pakistan&amp;rsquo;s Indus Basin Region</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/5</link>
	<description>Scholars and policymakers have recognized that collaborating on transboundary water resources is a significant way to promote peace and stability in conflict-prone areas. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960 between India and Pakistan remains one of the few enduring agreements on water management between the two countries. It has persisted through numerous wars and periods of political hostility. However, the treaty&amp;amp;rsquo;s resilience and relevance are increasingly challenged by growing water shortages, changing weather patterns, and varying development plans. Besides these challenges, the militarization of Pakistan&amp;amp;rsquo;s Indus Basin region also exemplifies significant resource challenges in South Asia. This paper examines the IWT both as a growing case of militarization in Pakistan&amp;amp;rsquo;s Indus Basin Region and as a potential source of the broader environmental peacebuilding framework. Using a qualitative and conceptualization of the issue based on an environmental peacebuilding framework, the paper concludes that strengthening the IWT requires collaborative environmental peacebuilding strategies to transform the Indus Basin from a zone of militarization into a foundation for sustainable water peace and regional water security stability in South Asia.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-11</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 5: Navigating the Indus Waters Treaty and Peacebuilding: The Growing Case of Strategic Militarization in Pakistan&amp;rsquo;s Indus Basin Region</b></p>
	<p>Peace Studies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/5">doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010005</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Pintu Kumar Mahla
		</p>
	<p>Scholars and policymakers have recognized that collaborating on transboundary water resources is a significant way to promote peace and stability in conflict-prone areas. The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960 between India and Pakistan remains one of the few enduring agreements on water management between the two countries. It has persisted through numerous wars and periods of political hostility. However, the treaty&amp;amp;rsquo;s resilience and relevance are increasingly challenged by growing water shortages, changing weather patterns, and varying development plans. Besides these challenges, the militarization of Pakistan&amp;amp;rsquo;s Indus Basin region also exemplifies significant resource challenges in South Asia. This paper examines the IWT both as a growing case of militarization in Pakistan&amp;amp;rsquo;s Indus Basin Region and as a potential source of the broader environmental peacebuilding framework. Using a qualitative and conceptualization of the issue based on an environmental peacebuilding framework, the paper concludes that strengthening the IWT requires collaborative environmental peacebuilding strategies to transform the Indus Basin from a zone of militarization into a foundation for sustainable water peace and regional water security stability in South Asia.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Navigating the Indus Waters Treaty and Peacebuilding: The Growing Case of Strategic Militarization in Pakistan&amp;amp;rsquo;s Indus Basin Region</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Pintu Kumar Mahla</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010005</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Peace Studies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-11</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Peace Studies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/peacestud1010005</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/5</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/4">

	<title>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 4: Mitigating Ethnic Violent Conflicts: A Sociotechnical Framework</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/4</link>
	<description>This study presents a sociotechnical framework for mitigating ethnic violent conflicts by integrating information and communication technologies (ICTs) with community-based social capital. Drawing on longitudinal case studies from three conflict-prone regions in Kenya, Mt. Elgon, Muhoroni, and the Turkana&amp;amp;ndash;West Pokot borderlands, the research examines how ICT-enabled peace networks, particularly the Early Warning and Early Response System (EWERS), mobilize bonding, bridging, and linking social capital to reduce violence. The study employs a multi-phase qualitative design, combining retrospective analysis, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, action participation, and thematic coding of EWERS data collected between 2009 and 2021. This approach enabled the reconstruction of system evolution, stakeholder dynamics, and community responses across diverse socio-political contexts. Findings demonstrate that embedding ICTs within trusted social structures fosters inter-ethnic collaboration, inclusive decision-making, and trust-building. EWERS facilitated confidential reporting, timely alerts, and coordinated interventions, leading to reductions in livestock theft, improved leadership accountability, emergence of inter-ethnic business networks, and enhanced visibility and response to gender-based violence. The system&amp;amp;rsquo;s effectiveness was amplified by faith-based legitimacy, local governance integration, and adaptive training strategies. The study argues that ICTs can become effective enablers of peace when sensitively contextualized within local norms, relationships, and community trust. Operationalizing social capital through digital infrastructure strengthens community resilience and supports inclusive, sustainale peacebuilding. These insights offer a scalable model for ICT-integrated violence mitigation in low- and middle-income countries. This is among the first studies to operationalize bonding, bridging, and linking social capital within ICT-enabled peace networks in rural African contexts. By embedding digital infrastructure into trusted community relationships, the framework offers an analytical approach that can inform inclusive violence mitigation strategies across low- and middle-income settings. While the framework demonstrates potential for scalability, its outcomes depend on contextual adaptation and cannot be assumed to replicate uniformly across all environments.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-12-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 4: Mitigating Ethnic Violent Conflicts: A Sociotechnical Framework</b></p>
	<p>Peace Studies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/4">doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010004</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Festus Mukoya
		</p>
	<p>This study presents a sociotechnical framework for mitigating ethnic violent conflicts by integrating information and communication technologies (ICTs) with community-based social capital. Drawing on longitudinal case studies from three conflict-prone regions in Kenya, Mt. Elgon, Muhoroni, and the Turkana&amp;amp;ndash;West Pokot borderlands, the research examines how ICT-enabled peace networks, particularly the Early Warning and Early Response System (EWERS), mobilize bonding, bridging, and linking social capital to reduce violence. The study employs a multi-phase qualitative design, combining retrospective analysis, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, action participation, and thematic coding of EWERS data collected between 2009 and 2021. This approach enabled the reconstruction of system evolution, stakeholder dynamics, and community responses across diverse socio-political contexts. Findings demonstrate that embedding ICTs within trusted social structures fosters inter-ethnic collaboration, inclusive decision-making, and trust-building. EWERS facilitated confidential reporting, timely alerts, and coordinated interventions, leading to reductions in livestock theft, improved leadership accountability, emergence of inter-ethnic business networks, and enhanced visibility and response to gender-based violence. The system&amp;amp;rsquo;s effectiveness was amplified by faith-based legitimacy, local governance integration, and adaptive training strategies. The study argues that ICTs can become effective enablers of peace when sensitively contextualized within local norms, relationships, and community trust. Operationalizing social capital through digital infrastructure strengthens community resilience and supports inclusive, sustainale peacebuilding. These insights offer a scalable model for ICT-integrated violence mitigation in low- and middle-income countries. This is among the first studies to operationalize bonding, bridging, and linking social capital within ICT-enabled peace networks in rural African contexts. By embedding digital infrastructure into trusted community relationships, the framework offers an analytical approach that can inform inclusive violence mitigation strategies across low- and middle-income settings. While the framework demonstrates potential for scalability, its outcomes depend on contextual adaptation and cannot be assumed to replicate uniformly across all environments.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Mitigating Ethnic Violent Conflicts: A Sociotechnical Framework</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Festus Mukoya</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010004</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Peace Studies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-12-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Peace Studies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/peacestud1010004</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/4</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/3">

	<title>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 3: Exploring Social Identity Theory: A Case Study of the Taliban in Afghanistan</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/3</link>
	<description>The motivations behind terrorism have emerged from debates on armed conflict. This article seeks to explore the membership status of the Taliban that maintained a positive social identity as an in-group to fight vigorously against the international community and seize Afghanistan in August 2021. With a range of semi-structured interviews with key security and justice stakeholders and civil society groups in Kabul from 2010 to 2016, opinions are based on efforts that engaged with Security Sector Reform (SSR) and fighting the resilience of the Taliban. It was found that the Taliban continued its fight and growth in membership and partial civic support due to its strong social identity (as an in-group) fighting an undesired, illegitimate, and corrupt state, judiciary, and police force supported by the international community. As part of social identity theory, poverty, unemployment, corruption and immorality are seen to serve a strategic and tactical purpose in aiding the socioeconomic, political and religious motives for recruitment towards the Taliban. However, after reseizing power, sanctions, a reduction in international aid, poverty and civic discontent with strict governance have resulted in other rival terrorist and resistance groups posing a threat to the Taliban, losing its positive social identity.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-10-16</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 3: Exploring Social Identity Theory: A Case Study of the Taliban in Afghanistan</b></p>
	<p>Peace Studies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/3">doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010003</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Danny Singh
		</p>
	<p>The motivations behind terrorism have emerged from debates on armed conflict. This article seeks to explore the membership status of the Taliban that maintained a positive social identity as an in-group to fight vigorously against the international community and seize Afghanistan in August 2021. With a range of semi-structured interviews with key security and justice stakeholders and civil society groups in Kabul from 2010 to 2016, opinions are based on efforts that engaged with Security Sector Reform (SSR) and fighting the resilience of the Taliban. It was found that the Taliban continued its fight and growth in membership and partial civic support due to its strong social identity (as an in-group) fighting an undesired, illegitimate, and corrupt state, judiciary, and police force supported by the international community. As part of social identity theory, poverty, unemployment, corruption and immorality are seen to serve a strategic and tactical purpose in aiding the socioeconomic, political and religious motives for recruitment towards the Taliban. However, after reseizing power, sanctions, a reduction in international aid, poverty and civic discontent with strict governance have resulted in other rival terrorist and resistance groups posing a threat to the Taliban, losing its positive social identity.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Exploring Social Identity Theory: A Case Study of the Taliban in Afghanistan</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Danny Singh</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010003</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Peace Studies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-10-16</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Peace Studies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/peacestud1010003</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/3</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/2">

	<title>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 2: Peace Ethics in Islam: The Contribution of Wahiduddin Khan (1925&amp;ndash;2021)</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/2</link>
	<description>Muslim theologian and well-known Indian peace activist Wahiduddin Khan (1925&amp;amp;ndash;2021) had a significant impact on the development of peace ethics in Islam. In addition to writing several books and essays on peace and non-violence, he also took part in Indian political debates and engaged in global issues related to Islam and the Middle East. He is one of the most prolific Muslim thinkers on peace and non-violence, having crafted a systematic approach to peace in his eleven books on the subject. This article discusses his contributions to Islamic peace ethics along with an applied case of his non-violence principles to the Israeli&amp;amp;ndash;Palestinian conflict. Furthermore, this article critically examines the consistency, applicability, and effects of his theory of peace.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-09-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 2: Peace Ethics in Islam: The Contribution of Wahiduddin Khan (1925&amp;ndash;2021)</b></p>
	<p>Peace Studies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/2">doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010002</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Abdessamad Belhaj
		</p>
	<p>Muslim theologian and well-known Indian peace activist Wahiduddin Khan (1925&amp;amp;ndash;2021) had a significant impact on the development of peace ethics in Islam. In addition to writing several books and essays on peace and non-violence, he also took part in Indian political debates and engaged in global issues related to Islam and the Middle East. He is one of the most prolific Muslim thinkers on peace and non-violence, having crafted a systematic approach to peace in his eleven books on the subject. This article discusses his contributions to Islamic peace ethics along with an applied case of his non-violence principles to the Israeli&amp;amp;ndash;Palestinian conflict. Furthermore, this article critically examines the consistency, applicability, and effects of his theory of peace.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Peace Ethics in Islam: The Contribution of Wahiduddin Khan (1925&amp;amp;ndash;2021)</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Abdessamad Belhaj</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010002</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Peace Studies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-09-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Peace Studies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/peacestud1010002</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/2</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/1">

	<title>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 1: Peace Studies: A New Open Access Journal Dedicated to Multidisciplinary Research and Evidence-Driven Policy and Practice</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/1</link>
	<description>The times we live in call for robust discussions for and about peace [...]</description>
	<pubDate>2025-09-28</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Peace Studies, Vol. 1, Pages 1: Peace Studies: A New Open Access Journal Dedicated to Multidisciplinary Research and Evidence-Driven Policy and Practice</b></p>
	<p>Peace Studies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/1">doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010001</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Stacey L. Connaughton
		</p>
	<p>The times we live in call for robust discussions for and about peace [...]</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Peace Studies: A New Open Access Journal Dedicated to Multidisciplinary Research and Evidence-Driven Policy and Practice</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Stacey L. Connaughton</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/peacestud1010001</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Peace Studies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-09-28</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Peace Studies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/peacestud1010001</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6529/1/1/1</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
    
<cc:License rdf:about="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
</cc:License>

</rdf:RDF>
