<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
 xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
 xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/rss/journal/glacies">
		<title>Glacies</title>
		<description>Latest open access articles published in Glacies at https://www.mdpi.com/journal/glacies</description>
		<link>https://www.mdpi.com/journal/glacies</link>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/journal/glacies"/>
		<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:support@mdpi.com"/>
		<dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY)</dc:rights>
						<prism:copyright>MDPI</prism:copyright>
		<prism:rightsAgent>support@mdpi.com</prism:rightsAgent>
		<image rdf:resource="https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo.png?13cf3b5bd783e021?1778581344"/>
				<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/5" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/4" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/3" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/2" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/1" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/16" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/15" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/14" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/13" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/12" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/11" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/10" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/9" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/8" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/7" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/6" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/5" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/4" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/3" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/2" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/1" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/8" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/7" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/6" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/5" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/4" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/3" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/2" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/1" />
                    	</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
				<cc:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" />
	</channel>

        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/5">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 5: Distinguishing Between Internal Ice Deformation, Weertman Sliding, and Coulomb Friction in Antarctic Ice Sheet Surface Speeds</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/5</link>
	<description>Future contributions to sea level rise from the Antarctic Ice Sheet due to climate change remain one of the largest uncertainties for future sea level. Improving predictions of ice mass loss is a major goal of numerical ice sheet models, but a major difficulty is that ice sheet models assume an empirical fit to modern-day observed speeds to infer sliding parameters. While this results in accurate modern-day comparisons, predictions for future or past climates that have substantially different conditions will be inaccurate if the empirical sliding law used is not appropriate. To help constrain which basal physics is most appropriate and therefore which basal parameterizations should be used in ice sheet models, here, we pursue an understanding of which physical mechanisms are most likely to explain the spatial variability in flowline speeds throughout the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Specifically, we compare observed flowline surface speeds with predictions of speeds from internal ice deformation and Weertman sliding using a conservative range of physical parameters. Despite large uncertainties, we find a number of flowlines where the predictions can be distinguished from each other and one can infer that one of the two mechanisms, or a third mechanism, Coulomb frictional failure, may likely be principally responsible. Geographic patterns in the dominant mechanism are observed. Weertman sliding appears dominant in several flowline clusters in East Antarctica, and there are regional consistencies in the estimated nearness to flotation at locations of inferred initiation of Coulomb failure. Weertman sliding at faster rates is also observed within regions of inferred Coulomb failure, consistent with theoretical expectations. The key finding that the dominant deformation mechanism varies along and between Antarctic flowlines may complicate how ice sheet models need to be parameterized if accurate predictions of future ice loss and sea level rise are to be accurate.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-23</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 5: Distinguishing Between Internal Ice Deformation, Weertman Sliding, and Coulomb Friction in Antarctic Ice Sheet Surface Speeds</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/5">doi: 10.3390/glacies3010005</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Hillel Rosenshine
		Victor C. Tsai
		</p>
	<p>Future contributions to sea level rise from the Antarctic Ice Sheet due to climate change remain one of the largest uncertainties for future sea level. Improving predictions of ice mass loss is a major goal of numerical ice sheet models, but a major difficulty is that ice sheet models assume an empirical fit to modern-day observed speeds to infer sliding parameters. While this results in accurate modern-day comparisons, predictions for future or past climates that have substantially different conditions will be inaccurate if the empirical sliding law used is not appropriate. To help constrain which basal physics is most appropriate and therefore which basal parameterizations should be used in ice sheet models, here, we pursue an understanding of which physical mechanisms are most likely to explain the spatial variability in flowline speeds throughout the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Specifically, we compare observed flowline surface speeds with predictions of speeds from internal ice deformation and Weertman sliding using a conservative range of physical parameters. Despite large uncertainties, we find a number of flowlines where the predictions can be distinguished from each other and one can infer that one of the two mechanisms, or a third mechanism, Coulomb frictional failure, may likely be principally responsible. Geographic patterns in the dominant mechanism are observed. Weertman sliding appears dominant in several flowline clusters in East Antarctica, and there are regional consistencies in the estimated nearness to flotation at locations of inferred initiation of Coulomb failure. Weertman sliding at faster rates is also observed within regions of inferred Coulomb failure, consistent with theoretical expectations. The key finding that the dominant deformation mechanism varies along and between Antarctic flowlines may complicate how ice sheet models need to be parameterized if accurate predictions of future ice loss and sea level rise are to be accurate.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Distinguishing Between Internal Ice Deformation, Weertman Sliding, and Coulomb Friction in Antarctic Ice Sheet Surface Speeds</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Hillel Rosenshine</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Victor C. Tsai</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies3010005</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-23</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies3010005</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/5</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/4">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 4: Snow Surface Roughness at a Ski Resort During Melt</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/4</link>
	<description>When snow is present, the snow surface is the interface between the atmosphere and the Earth&amp;amp;rsquo;s surface. The snowpack energy balance is dictated in part by snow surface roughness, which can be quite dynamic. At the Sierra Nevada ski resort in Spain, we measured several snow surface forms: natural, with the presence of dust, with the presence of sun cups, and groomed snow (tracked and between tracks). The snow surface was assessed in 2-dimensions from snow roughness boards and in 3-dimensions from iPad surface scanning to measure across resolutions. Both data collection methods yielded similar roughness estimates via random roughness (RR) and variogram analysis (scale break, SB, and fractal dimension, D) for each distinct surface, yet the roughness differences between the surfaces were substantial. The geometry-based aerodynamic roughness length (z0) was computed for the iPad-scanned surfaces, yielding an order-of-magnitude variability in z0. This produced an order-of-magnitude difference in modelled sublimation. This work can inform snow management at ski areas and reflects some of the snow-surface conditions encountered in a natural snowpack.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-03-05</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 4: Snow Surface Roughness at a Ski Resort During Melt</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/4">doi: 10.3390/glacies3010004</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Steven R. Fassnacht
		Javier Herrero
		Jessica E. Sanow
		</p>
	<p>When snow is present, the snow surface is the interface between the atmosphere and the Earth&amp;amp;rsquo;s surface. The snowpack energy balance is dictated in part by snow surface roughness, which can be quite dynamic. At the Sierra Nevada ski resort in Spain, we measured several snow surface forms: natural, with the presence of dust, with the presence of sun cups, and groomed snow (tracked and between tracks). The snow surface was assessed in 2-dimensions from snow roughness boards and in 3-dimensions from iPad surface scanning to measure across resolutions. Both data collection methods yielded similar roughness estimates via random roughness (RR) and variogram analysis (scale break, SB, and fractal dimension, D) for each distinct surface, yet the roughness differences between the surfaces were substantial. The geometry-based aerodynamic roughness length (z0) was computed for the iPad-scanned surfaces, yielding an order-of-magnitude variability in z0. This produced an order-of-magnitude difference in modelled sublimation. This work can inform snow management at ski areas and reflects some of the snow-surface conditions encountered in a natural snowpack.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Snow Surface Roughness at a Ski Resort During Melt</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Steven R. Fassnacht</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Javier Herrero</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jessica E. Sanow</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies3010004</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-03-05</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies3010004</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/4</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/3">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 3: Harnessing AI, Virtual Landscapes, and Anthropomorphic Imaginaries to Enhance Environmental Science Education at J&amp;ouml;kuls&amp;aacute;rl&amp;oacute;n Proglacial Lagoon, Iceland</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/3</link>
	<description>Introductory environmental science courses offer non-STEM students an entry point to address global challenges such as climate change and cryosphere preservation. Aligned with the International Year of Glacier Preservation and the Decade of Action for Cryospheric Sciences, this mixed-method, IRB-exempt study applied the Curriculum Redesign and Artificial Intelligence-Facilitated Transformation (CRAFT) model for course redesign. The project leveraged a human-centered AI approach to create anthropomorphized, place-based narratives for online learning. Generative AI is used to amend immersive virtual learning environments (VLEs) that animate glacial forces (water, rock, and elemental cycles) through narrative-driven virtual reality (VR) experiences. Students explored Iceland&amp;amp;rsquo;s J&amp;amp;ouml;kuls&amp;amp;aacute;rl&amp;amp;oacute;n Glacier Lagoon via self-guided field simulations led by an imaginary water droplet, designed to foster environmental awareness and a sense of place. Data collection included a five-point Likert-scale survey and thematic coding of student comments. Findings revealed strong positive sentiment: 87.1% enjoyment of the imaginaries, 82.5% agreement on supporting connection to places, and 82.0% endorsement of their role in reinforcing spatial and systems thinking. Thematic analysis confirmed that anthropomorphic imaginaries enhanced emotional engagement and conceptual understanding of glacial processes, situating glacier preservation within geographic and global contexts. This AI-enhanced, multimodal approach demonstrates how narrative-based VR can make complex cryospheric concepts accessible for non-STEM learners, promoting early engagement with climate science and environmental stewardship.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-02-01</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 3: Harnessing AI, Virtual Landscapes, and Anthropomorphic Imaginaries to Enhance Environmental Science Education at J&amp;ouml;kuls&amp;aacute;rl&amp;oacute;n Proglacial Lagoon, Iceland</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/3">doi: 10.3390/glacies3010003</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jacquelyn Kelly
		Dianna Gielstra
		Tomáš J. Oberding
		Jim Bruno
		Stephanie Cosentino
		</p>
	<p>Introductory environmental science courses offer non-STEM students an entry point to address global challenges such as climate change and cryosphere preservation. Aligned with the International Year of Glacier Preservation and the Decade of Action for Cryospheric Sciences, this mixed-method, IRB-exempt study applied the Curriculum Redesign and Artificial Intelligence-Facilitated Transformation (CRAFT) model for course redesign. The project leveraged a human-centered AI approach to create anthropomorphized, place-based narratives for online learning. Generative AI is used to amend immersive virtual learning environments (VLEs) that animate glacial forces (water, rock, and elemental cycles) through narrative-driven virtual reality (VR) experiences. Students explored Iceland&amp;amp;rsquo;s J&amp;amp;ouml;kuls&amp;amp;aacute;rl&amp;amp;oacute;n Glacier Lagoon via self-guided field simulations led by an imaginary water droplet, designed to foster environmental awareness and a sense of place. Data collection included a five-point Likert-scale survey and thematic coding of student comments. Findings revealed strong positive sentiment: 87.1% enjoyment of the imaginaries, 82.5% agreement on supporting connection to places, and 82.0% endorsement of their role in reinforcing spatial and systems thinking. Thematic analysis confirmed that anthropomorphic imaginaries enhanced emotional engagement and conceptual understanding of glacial processes, situating glacier preservation within geographic and global contexts. This AI-enhanced, multimodal approach demonstrates how narrative-based VR can make complex cryospheric concepts accessible for non-STEM learners, promoting early engagement with climate science and environmental stewardship.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Harnessing AI, Virtual Landscapes, and Anthropomorphic Imaginaries to Enhance Environmental Science Education at J&amp;amp;ouml;kuls&amp;amp;aacute;rl&amp;amp;oacute;n Proglacial Lagoon, Iceland</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jacquelyn Kelly</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dianna Gielstra</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tomáš J. Oberding</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jim Bruno</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stephanie Cosentino</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies3010003</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-02-01</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies3010003</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/3</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/2">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 2: Uncertainty, Experiences, and Focus</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/2</link>
	<description>As 2026 began, it was the middle of winter in much of the northern hemisphere [...]</description>
	<pubDate>2026-01-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 2: Uncertainty, Experiences, and Focus</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/2">doi: 10.3390/glacies3010002</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Steven R. Fassnacht
		</p>
	<p>As 2026 began, it was the middle of winter in much of the northern hemisphere [...]</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Uncertainty, Experiences, and Focus</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Steven R. Fassnacht</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies3010002</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-01-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies3010002</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/2</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/1">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 1: Characterising Ice Motion Variability at Helheim Glacier Front from Continuous GPS Observations</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/1</link>
	<description>Understanding short-term glacier motion is vital for assessing ice sheet dynamics in a warming climate. This study investigates the tidal and diurnal influences on the flow of Helheim Glacier, one of Greenland&amp;amp;rsquo;s fastest-flowing marine-terminating glaciers, using data from 18 high-frequency GPS sensors and a regional tide gauge collected during summer 2013. A Kalman filter was applied to separate and quantify glacier velocity, tidal admittance, and diurnal melt-driven acceleration. Results reveal a high level of tidal admittance affecting the horizontal flow speed of the glacier, especially at the centre of the glacier, which is propagated upstream. This admittance corresponds to a 0.38&amp;amp;ndash;0.68 m/day reduction from the mean at high spring tide and a comparable increase at low tide. The glacier&amp;amp;rsquo;s vertical motion showed strong tidal control close to the terminus, of 0.6&amp;amp;ndash;1.05 m during high spring tides, but this was significantly reduced more than 1 km from the terminus. Diurnal variations in horizontal speed are less spatially and temporally variable, with most nodes experiencing changes from a mean speed of &amp;amp;plusmn;0.1&amp;amp;ndash;0.3 m/day. These findings demonstrate that both tidal forcing and meltwater input to the basal system exert a significant, and potentially spatially variable, control on glacier dynamics, highlighting the need to incorporate short-period external forcing into predictive models of marine-terminating glacier behaviour.</description>
	<pubDate>2026-01-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 3, Pages 1: Characterising Ice Motion Variability at Helheim Glacier Front from Continuous GPS Observations</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/1">doi: 10.3390/glacies3010001</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Christopher Pearson
		James Colinese
		Tavi Murray
		Stuart Edwards
		</p>
	<p>Understanding short-term glacier motion is vital for assessing ice sheet dynamics in a warming climate. This study investigates the tidal and diurnal influences on the flow of Helheim Glacier, one of Greenland&amp;amp;rsquo;s fastest-flowing marine-terminating glaciers, using data from 18 high-frequency GPS sensors and a regional tide gauge collected during summer 2013. A Kalman filter was applied to separate and quantify glacier velocity, tidal admittance, and diurnal melt-driven acceleration. Results reveal a high level of tidal admittance affecting the horizontal flow speed of the glacier, especially at the centre of the glacier, which is propagated upstream. This admittance corresponds to a 0.38&amp;amp;ndash;0.68 m/day reduction from the mean at high spring tide and a comparable increase at low tide. The glacier&amp;amp;rsquo;s vertical motion showed strong tidal control close to the terminus, of 0.6&amp;amp;ndash;1.05 m during high spring tides, but this was significantly reduced more than 1 km from the terminus. Diurnal variations in horizontal speed are less spatially and temporally variable, with most nodes experiencing changes from a mean speed of &amp;amp;plusmn;0.1&amp;amp;ndash;0.3 m/day. These findings demonstrate that both tidal forcing and meltwater input to the basal system exert a significant, and potentially spatially variable, control on glacier dynamics, highlighting the need to incorporate short-period external forcing into predictive models of marine-terminating glacier behaviour.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Characterising Ice Motion Variability at Helheim Glacier Front from Continuous GPS Observations</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Pearson</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>James Colinese</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tavi Murray</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Stuart Edwards</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies3010001</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2026-01-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies3010001</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/3/1/1</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/16">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 16: Madden&amp;ndash;Julian Oscillation Modulation of Antarctic Sea Ice</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/16</link>
	<description>Convection associated with the leading mode of subseasonal variability of the tropical atmosphere, the Madden&amp;amp;ndash;Julian Oscillation (MJO), can excite Rossby wave trains that extend well into the extratropics and allow the MJO to modulate many components of the Earth system. To improve our understanding of teleconnections between the MJO and Antarctic sea ice, composite anomalies of daily change in sea ice concentration (&amp;amp;Delta;SIC) from 1989 to 2019 were binned by phase 0&amp;amp;ndash;20 days after an active MJO and compared to anomalies of surface air temperature, the meridional component of surface wind, and sea-level pressure. In May, &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies were strongest in the Indian Ocean (IO) sector, 16 days after phase 8. There, a wavenumber-three pattern in sea-level pressure anomalies associated with the MJO resulted in anomalously poleward winds and warmer temperatures over the central and eastern IO that were collocated with anomalously negative &amp;amp;Delta;SIC. Furthermore, anomalously equatorward winds and colder temperatures in the western IO were collocated with anomalously positive &amp;amp;Delta;SIC. In July, &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies were strongest in the Weddell Sea (WS) sector nine days after an active MJO in phase 2. There, a wavenumber-three pattern in sea-level pressure anomalies resulted in anomalously poleward winds and warmer temperatures over the western and central WS that were collocated with negative &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies; anomalously equatorward winds and colder temperatures over the eastern WS were collocated with positive &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies. In September, the largest &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies were observed in the IO and WS sectors six days after an active MJO in phase 8. No meaningful modulation of sea ice anomalies was found after an active MJO in November or January. These results extend our understanding of teleconnections between the MJO and Antarctic sea ice on the subseasonal time scale.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-12-13</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 16: Madden&amp;ndash;Julian Oscillation Modulation of Antarctic Sea Ice</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/16">doi: 10.3390/glacies2040016</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Bradford S. Barrett
		Donald M. Lafleur
		Gina R. Henderson
		</p>
	<p>Convection associated with the leading mode of subseasonal variability of the tropical atmosphere, the Madden&amp;amp;ndash;Julian Oscillation (MJO), can excite Rossby wave trains that extend well into the extratropics and allow the MJO to modulate many components of the Earth system. To improve our understanding of teleconnections between the MJO and Antarctic sea ice, composite anomalies of daily change in sea ice concentration (&amp;amp;Delta;SIC) from 1989 to 2019 were binned by phase 0&amp;amp;ndash;20 days after an active MJO and compared to anomalies of surface air temperature, the meridional component of surface wind, and sea-level pressure. In May, &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies were strongest in the Indian Ocean (IO) sector, 16 days after phase 8. There, a wavenumber-three pattern in sea-level pressure anomalies associated with the MJO resulted in anomalously poleward winds and warmer temperatures over the central and eastern IO that were collocated with anomalously negative &amp;amp;Delta;SIC. Furthermore, anomalously equatorward winds and colder temperatures in the western IO were collocated with anomalously positive &amp;amp;Delta;SIC. In July, &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies were strongest in the Weddell Sea (WS) sector nine days after an active MJO in phase 2. There, a wavenumber-three pattern in sea-level pressure anomalies resulted in anomalously poleward winds and warmer temperatures over the western and central WS that were collocated with negative &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies; anomalously equatorward winds and colder temperatures over the eastern WS were collocated with positive &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies. In September, the largest &amp;amp;Delta;SIC anomalies were observed in the IO and WS sectors six days after an active MJO in phase 8. No meaningful modulation of sea ice anomalies was found after an active MJO in November or January. These results extend our understanding of teleconnections between the MJO and Antarctic sea ice on the subseasonal time scale.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Madden&amp;amp;ndash;Julian Oscillation Modulation of Antarctic Sea Ice</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Bradford S. Barrett</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Donald M. Lafleur</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Gina R. Henderson</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2040016</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-12-13</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2040016</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/16</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/15">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 15: Evaluating Snow Pavement Strength in Remote Cold Environments via California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and Russian Snow Penetrometer (RSP) Combined Testing</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/15</link>
	<description>Accurate assessment of compacted snow strength is critical for ensuring the safety and performance of snow runways in cold environments. The Russian Snow Penetrometer (RSP) is widely used in snow science and engineering due to its simplicity, portability, and capability for rapid field measurements under extreme conditions. Conversely, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test remains the benchmark for evaluating the load-bearing capacity of conventional granular materials but is seldom applied to snow because of logistical constraints and the material&amp;amp;rsquo;s complex mechanical behavior. The relationship between these two pavement evaluation tools remains poorly defined. This work investigates how RSP strength indices relate to CBR measurements to determine whether the RSP can serve as a practical proxy for snow pavement load-bearing capacity. Side-by-side field measurements of snow pavement strength were collected over a 30 h period at two test section locations. Both methods captured temporal strength increases and spatial variability, with consistently higher values at the second site attributed to extended sintering. A moderate linear correlation (R2 = 0.44) between RSP and CBR results supports a quantifiable relationship between the two methods. These findings begin to bridge the gap between conventional pavement testing and snow-specific strength evaluation, demonstrating the potential of the RSP for rapid assessment of snow runways. Continued data collection and analysis will refine this relationship and strengthen its applicability for operational use.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-12-04</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 15: Evaluating Snow Pavement Strength in Remote Cold Environments via California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and Russian Snow Penetrometer (RSP) Combined Testing</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/15">doi: 10.3390/glacies2040015</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Katie L. Duggan DiDominic
		Margarita Ordaz
		Terry D. Melendy
		Chrestien M. Charlebois
		</p>
	<p>Accurate assessment of compacted snow strength is critical for ensuring the safety and performance of snow runways in cold environments. The Russian Snow Penetrometer (RSP) is widely used in snow science and engineering due to its simplicity, portability, and capability for rapid field measurements under extreme conditions. Conversely, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test remains the benchmark for evaluating the load-bearing capacity of conventional granular materials but is seldom applied to snow because of logistical constraints and the material&amp;amp;rsquo;s complex mechanical behavior. The relationship between these two pavement evaluation tools remains poorly defined. This work investigates how RSP strength indices relate to CBR measurements to determine whether the RSP can serve as a practical proxy for snow pavement load-bearing capacity. Side-by-side field measurements of snow pavement strength were collected over a 30 h period at two test section locations. Both methods captured temporal strength increases and spatial variability, with consistently higher values at the second site attributed to extended sintering. A moderate linear correlation (R2 = 0.44) between RSP and CBR results supports a quantifiable relationship between the two methods. These findings begin to bridge the gap between conventional pavement testing and snow-specific strength evaluation, demonstrating the potential of the RSP for rapid assessment of snow runways. Continued data collection and analysis will refine this relationship and strengthen its applicability for operational use.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Evaluating Snow Pavement Strength in Remote Cold Environments via California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and Russian Snow Penetrometer (RSP) Combined Testing</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Katie L. Duggan DiDominic</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Margarita Ordaz</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Terry D. Melendy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chrestien M. Charlebois</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2040015</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-12-04</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-04</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2040015</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/15</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/14">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 14: Compressed Snow Blocks: Evaluating the Feasibility of Adapting Earth Block Technology for Cold Regions</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/14</link>
	<description>Snow construction plays a crucial role in military operations in cold regions, providing tactical fortifications, thermal insulation, and emergency infrastructure in environments where conventional building materials are scarce or require extensive infrastructure for support. Current snow construction methods, including manual piling and compaction, are labor-intensive and inconsistent, limiting their use in large-scale or time-sensitive operations. This study explores the feasibility of adapting a compressed earth block (CEB) machine to produce compressed snow blocks (CSBs) as modular, uniform building units for cold-region applications. Using an AECT Impact 2001A hydraulic press, naturally occurring snow was processed with a snowblower and compacted at maximum operating pressure (i.e., 20,684 kPa) to evaluate block formation, dimensional consistency, and density. The machine successfully produced relatively consistent CSBs, but the initial 3&amp;amp;ndash;4 blocks following block height adjustment were generally unsuccessful (e.g., incorrect block height or collapsed/broke) while the machine reached its steady state cyclic condition. These blocks were discarded and excluded from the dataset. The successful CSBs had mean block heights of 7.76 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.56 cm and densities comparable to ice (i.e., 0.83 g/cm3). Variations in block height and mass may be attributed to manual snow loading and minor material impurities. While the dataset is limited, the results warrant further investigation into this technology, particularly regarding CSB strength (i.e., hardness and compressive strength) and performance under variable snow and environmental conditions. Mechanized snow compaction using existing CEB technology is technically feasible and capable of producing uniform, structurally stable CSBs but requires further investigation and modifications to reach its full potential. With design improvements such as automated snow feeding, cold-resistant components, and system winterization, this approach could enable scalable CSB production for rapid, on-site construction of snow-based structures in Arctic environments, supporting the military and civilian needs.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-11-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 14: Compressed Snow Blocks: Evaluating the Feasibility of Adapting Earth Block Technology for Cold Regions</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/14">doi: 10.3390/glacies2040014</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Katie L. Duggan DiDominic
		Terry D. Melendy
		Chrestien M. Charlebois
		</p>
	<p>Snow construction plays a crucial role in military operations in cold regions, providing tactical fortifications, thermal insulation, and emergency infrastructure in environments where conventional building materials are scarce or require extensive infrastructure for support. Current snow construction methods, including manual piling and compaction, are labor-intensive and inconsistent, limiting their use in large-scale or time-sensitive operations. This study explores the feasibility of adapting a compressed earth block (CEB) machine to produce compressed snow blocks (CSBs) as modular, uniform building units for cold-region applications. Using an AECT Impact 2001A hydraulic press, naturally occurring snow was processed with a snowblower and compacted at maximum operating pressure (i.e., 20,684 kPa) to evaluate block formation, dimensional consistency, and density. The machine successfully produced relatively consistent CSBs, but the initial 3&amp;amp;ndash;4 blocks following block height adjustment were generally unsuccessful (e.g., incorrect block height or collapsed/broke) while the machine reached its steady state cyclic condition. These blocks were discarded and excluded from the dataset. The successful CSBs had mean block heights of 7.76 &amp;amp;plusmn; 0.56 cm and densities comparable to ice (i.e., 0.83 g/cm3). Variations in block height and mass may be attributed to manual snow loading and minor material impurities. While the dataset is limited, the results warrant further investigation into this technology, particularly regarding CSB strength (i.e., hardness and compressive strength) and performance under variable snow and environmental conditions. Mechanized snow compaction using existing CEB technology is technically feasible and capable of producing uniform, structurally stable CSBs but requires further investigation and modifications to reach its full potential. With design improvements such as automated snow feeding, cold-resistant components, and system winterization, this approach could enable scalable CSB production for rapid, on-site construction of snow-based structures in Arctic environments, supporting the military and civilian needs.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Compressed Snow Blocks: Evaluating the Feasibility of Adapting Earth Block Technology for Cold Regions</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Katie L. Duggan DiDominic</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Terry D. Melendy</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Chrestien M. Charlebois</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2040014</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-11-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2040014</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/14</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/13">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 13: Mapping Glacial Lakes in the Upper Indus Basin (UIB) Using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Data</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/13</link>
	<description>Glacial lakes in the Upper Indus Basin (UIB) are rapidly evolving due to accelerated glacier retreat driven by climate change. Here we present a comprehensive inventory of glacial lakes using Sentinel-1 SAR data with adaptive backscatter thresholding, enabling consistent detection under challenging conditions and improving delineation accuracy. In August 2023, we identified 6019 glacial lakes at scales from 0.001 to 5.80 km2, covering a cumulative area of 266 km2 (~0.06% of the basin). Although more than 90% of the lakes are smaller than 0.1 km2, large lakes (&amp;amp;gt;0.1 km2) account for over 57% of the total lake area. Most lakes are concentrated between 4000 and 4600 m, coinciding with the main glacierized zone. Regional patterns reveal that the Hindu Kush and Himalayas are dominated by glacier erosion lakes (GELs) and moraine-dammed lakes (MDLs), reflecting widespread glacier retreat, whereas the Karakoram is characterized by numerous supraglacial lakes (SGLs) associated with extensive debris-covered glaciers. Compared to previous optical-based inventories, our SAR-based approach captures more lakes and better represents small and transient features such as SGLs. These findings provide a more accurate baseline for assessing cryospheric change and glacial lake hazards in one of the world&amp;amp;rsquo;s most heavily glacierized basins.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-11-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 13: Mapping Glacial Lakes in the Upper Indus Basin (UIB) Using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Data</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/13">doi: 10.3390/glacies2040013</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Imran Khan
		Jennifer M. Jacobs
		Jeremy M. Johnston
		Megan Vardaman
		</p>
	<p>Glacial lakes in the Upper Indus Basin (UIB) are rapidly evolving due to accelerated glacier retreat driven by climate change. Here we present a comprehensive inventory of glacial lakes using Sentinel-1 SAR data with adaptive backscatter thresholding, enabling consistent detection under challenging conditions and improving delineation accuracy. In August 2023, we identified 6019 glacial lakes at scales from 0.001 to 5.80 km2, covering a cumulative area of 266 km2 (~0.06% of the basin). Although more than 90% of the lakes are smaller than 0.1 km2, large lakes (&amp;amp;gt;0.1 km2) account for over 57% of the total lake area. Most lakes are concentrated between 4000 and 4600 m, coinciding with the main glacierized zone. Regional patterns reveal that the Hindu Kush and Himalayas are dominated by glacier erosion lakes (GELs) and moraine-dammed lakes (MDLs), reflecting widespread glacier retreat, whereas the Karakoram is characterized by numerous supraglacial lakes (SGLs) associated with extensive debris-covered glaciers. Compared to previous optical-based inventories, our SAR-based approach captures more lakes and better represents small and transient features such as SGLs. These findings provide a more accurate baseline for assessing cryospheric change and glacial lake hazards in one of the world&amp;amp;rsquo;s most heavily glacierized basins.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Mapping Glacial Lakes in the Upper Indus Basin (UIB) Using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Data</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Imran Khan</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jennifer M. Jacobs</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jeremy M. Johnston</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Megan Vardaman</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2040013</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-11-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2040013</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/13</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/12">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 12: Enhancing Arctic Ice Extent Predictions: Leveraging Time Series Analysis and Deep Learning Architectures</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/12</link>
	<description>With ongoing climate transformations, reliable Arctic sea ice forecasts are essential for understanding impacts on shipping, ecosystems, and climate teleconnections. This research examines physics-free neural architectures versus physics-informed statistical models for long-term Arctic projections by implementing Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) alongside a seasonal SARIMAX time series model incorporating physical predictors including temperature anomalies and ice thickness. We test whether neural models trained on historical ice data can match physics-informed SARIMAX reliability, and whether approaches exhibit systematic biases toward specific emission pathways. Using data from January 1979 to December 2024, we conducted forecasts through 2100, with SARIMAX driven by CMIP6 sea ice thickness under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Results decisively reject the first hypothesis: both neural models projected ice free Arctic summer by September 2089 regardless of emission scenario, while SARIMAX maintained physically plausible seasonal coverage throughout the century under both pathways. Neural approaches demonstrated systematic bias toward extreme warming exceeding even high-emission projections, revealing fundamental limitations in physics-free deep learning for climate forecasting where physical constraints are paramount.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-10-30</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 12: Enhancing Arctic Ice Extent Predictions: Leveraging Time Series Analysis and Deep Learning Architectures</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/12">doi: 10.3390/glacies2040012</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Benoit Ahanda
		Caleb Brinkman
		Ahmet Güler
		Türkay Yolcu
		</p>
	<p>With ongoing climate transformations, reliable Arctic sea ice forecasts are essential for understanding impacts on shipping, ecosystems, and climate teleconnections. This research examines physics-free neural architectures versus physics-informed statistical models for long-term Arctic projections by implementing Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) alongside a seasonal SARIMAX time series model incorporating physical predictors including temperature anomalies and ice thickness. We test whether neural models trained on historical ice data can match physics-informed SARIMAX reliability, and whether approaches exhibit systematic biases toward specific emission pathways. Using data from January 1979 to December 2024, we conducted forecasts through 2100, with SARIMAX driven by CMIP6 sea ice thickness under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Results decisively reject the first hypothesis: both neural models projected ice free Arctic summer by September 2089 regardless of emission scenario, while SARIMAX maintained physically plausible seasonal coverage throughout the century under both pathways. Neural approaches demonstrated systematic bias toward extreme warming exceeding even high-emission projections, revealing fundamental limitations in physics-free deep learning for climate forecasting where physical constraints are paramount.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Enhancing Arctic Ice Extent Predictions: Leveraging Time Series Analysis and Deep Learning Architectures</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Benoit Ahanda</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Caleb Brinkman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ahmet Güler</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Türkay Yolcu</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2040012</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-10-30</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2040012</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/12</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/11">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 11: Reanalyzing and Reinterpreting a Unique Set of Antarctic Acoustic Frazil Data Using River Frazil Results and Self-Validating 2-Frequency Analyses</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/11</link>
	<description>A previous analysis of Antarctic acoustic data relevant to quantifying frazil contributions to sea ice accretion is reconsidered to address inconsistencies with river frazil results acquired with similar instrumentation but augmented to suppress instrument icing. It was found that sound attenuation by consequent icing limited credible Antarctic acoustic frazil measurements to afternoon and early evening periods, which are shown to encompass daily minimums in frazil production. This reality was masked by use of an unvalidated liquid oblate spheroidal frazil characterization model, which greatly overestimated frazil concentrations. Much lower frazil contents were derived for these periods using a robust 2-frequency characterization algorithm, which incorporated a validated, alternative theory of scattering by elastic solid spheres. Physical arguments based on these results and instrument depth data were strongly suggestive of maximal but, currently, unquantified frazil presences during unanalyzed heavily iced late evening and morning time periods.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-10-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 11: Reanalyzing and Reinterpreting a Unique Set of Antarctic Acoustic Frazil Data Using River Frazil Results and Self-Validating 2-Frequency Analyses</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/11">doi: 10.3390/glacies2040011</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		John R. Marko
		David R. Topham
		David B. Fissel
		</p>
	<p>A previous analysis of Antarctic acoustic data relevant to quantifying frazil contributions to sea ice accretion is reconsidered to address inconsistencies with river frazil results acquired with similar instrumentation but augmented to suppress instrument icing. It was found that sound attenuation by consequent icing limited credible Antarctic acoustic frazil measurements to afternoon and early evening periods, which are shown to encompass daily minimums in frazil production. This reality was masked by use of an unvalidated liquid oblate spheroidal frazil characterization model, which greatly overestimated frazil concentrations. Much lower frazil contents were derived for these periods using a robust 2-frequency characterization algorithm, which incorporated a validated, alternative theory of scattering by elastic solid spheres. Physical arguments based on these results and instrument depth data were strongly suggestive of maximal but, currently, unquantified frazil presences during unanalyzed heavily iced late evening and morning time periods.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Reanalyzing and Reinterpreting a Unique Set of Antarctic Acoustic Frazil Data Using River Frazil Results and Self-Validating 2-Frequency Analyses</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>John R. Marko</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David R. Topham</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David B. Fissel</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2040011</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-10-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>4</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2040011</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/4/11</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/10">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 10: How Do Climate Change and Deglaciation Affect Runoff Formation Mechanisms in the High-Mountain River Basin of the North Caucasus?</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/10</link>
	<description>This study assesses the impact of climate change and glacier retreat on river runoff in the high-altitude Terek River Basin using the physically based ECOMAG hydrological model. Sensitivity experiments examined the influence of glaciation, precipitation, and air temperature on runoff variability. Results indicate that glacier retreat primarily affects streamflow in upper reaches during peak melt (July&amp;amp;ndash;October), while precipitation changes influence both annual runoff and peak flows (May&amp;amp;ndash;October). Rising temperatures shift snowmelt to earlier periods, increasing runoff in spring and autumn but reducing it in summer. The increase in autumn runoff is also due to the shift between solid and liquid precipitation, as warmer temperatures cause more precipitation to fall as rain, rather than snow. Scenario-based modeling incorporated projected glacier area changes (GloGEMflow-DD) and regional climate data (CORDEX) under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios. Simulated runoff changes by the end of the 21st century (2070&amp;amp;ndash;2099) compared to the historical period (1977&amp;amp;ndash;2005) ranged from &amp;amp;minus;2% to +5% under RCP2.6 and from &amp;amp;minus;8% to +14% under RCP8.5. Analysis of runoff components (snowmelt, rainfall, and glacier melt) revealed that changes in river flow are largely determined by the elevation of snow and glacier accumulation zones and the rate of their degradation. The projected trends are consistent with current observations and emphasize the need for adaptive water resource management and risk mitigation strategies in glacier-fed catchments under climate change.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-09-03</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 10: How Do Climate Change and Deglaciation Affect Runoff Formation Mechanisms in the High-Mountain River Basin of the North Caucasus?</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/10">doi: 10.3390/glacies2030010</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Ekaterina D. Pavlyukevich
		Inna N. Krylenko
		Yuri G. Motovilov
		Ekaterina P. Rets
		Irina A. Korneva
		Taisiya N. Postnikova
		Oleg O. Rybak
		</p>
	<p>This study assesses the impact of climate change and glacier retreat on river runoff in the high-altitude Terek River Basin using the physically based ECOMAG hydrological model. Sensitivity experiments examined the influence of glaciation, precipitation, and air temperature on runoff variability. Results indicate that glacier retreat primarily affects streamflow in upper reaches during peak melt (July&amp;amp;ndash;October), while precipitation changes influence both annual runoff and peak flows (May&amp;amp;ndash;October). Rising temperatures shift snowmelt to earlier periods, increasing runoff in spring and autumn but reducing it in summer. The increase in autumn runoff is also due to the shift between solid and liquid precipitation, as warmer temperatures cause more precipitation to fall as rain, rather than snow. Scenario-based modeling incorporated projected glacier area changes (GloGEMflow-DD) and regional climate data (CORDEX) under RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios. Simulated runoff changes by the end of the 21st century (2070&amp;amp;ndash;2099) compared to the historical period (1977&amp;amp;ndash;2005) ranged from &amp;amp;minus;2% to +5% under RCP2.6 and from &amp;amp;minus;8% to +14% under RCP8.5. Analysis of runoff components (snowmelt, rainfall, and glacier melt) revealed that changes in river flow are largely determined by the elevation of snow and glacier accumulation zones and the rate of their degradation. The projected trends are consistent with current observations and emphasize the need for adaptive water resource management and risk mitigation strategies in glacier-fed catchments under climate change.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>How Do Climate Change and Deglaciation Affect Runoff Formation Mechanisms in the High-Mountain River Basin of the North Caucasus?</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Ekaterina D. Pavlyukevich</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Inna N. Krylenko</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Yuri G. Motovilov</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Ekaterina P. Rets</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Irina A. Korneva</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Taisiya N. Postnikova</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Oleg O. Rybak</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2030010</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-09-03</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-09-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2030010</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/10</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/9">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 9: Glaciation in the Kuznetsky Alatau Mountains&amp;mdash;Dynamics and Current State According to Sentinel-2 Satellite Images and Field Studies</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/9</link>
	<description>Glaciers and glacierets of the Kuznetsky Alatau Mountains are distributed at altitudes of 1200&amp;amp;ndash;1500 m above sea level, which is not typical for continental areas. The main factor contributing to the persistence of glaciation here is abundant winter precipitation. According to ground surface temperature measurements, the negative annual values are typical for upper glacier boundaries only. Since intensive study during the compilation of the USSR Glacier Inventory (1965&amp;amp;ndash;1980), the glaciation of the region has undergone notable changes. To assess the current state of glaciation, Sentinel-2 satellite images were used; contours of the glaciers were traced on the basis of images from 2021 to 2023. In total, 78 glaciers and 57 glacierets were identified. UAV imagery and field inspection were used for validation. The total glaciated area has reduced from 8.5 to 3.1 km2, which is 50&amp;amp;ndash;75% for selected river basins, with slope morphological types decreasing the most. According to our opinion, the morphological classification requires clarification due to absence of hanging glaciers, described previously.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-08-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 9: Glaciation in the Kuznetsky Alatau Mountains&amp;mdash;Dynamics and Current State According to Sentinel-2 Satellite Images and Field Studies</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/9">doi: 10.3390/glacies2030009</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Maria Ananicheva
		Marina Adamenko
		Andrey Abramov
		</p>
	<p>Glaciers and glacierets of the Kuznetsky Alatau Mountains are distributed at altitudes of 1200&amp;amp;ndash;1500 m above sea level, which is not typical for continental areas. The main factor contributing to the persistence of glaciation here is abundant winter precipitation. According to ground surface temperature measurements, the negative annual values are typical for upper glacier boundaries only. Since intensive study during the compilation of the USSR Glacier Inventory (1965&amp;amp;ndash;1980), the glaciation of the region has undergone notable changes. To assess the current state of glaciation, Sentinel-2 satellite images were used; contours of the glaciers were traced on the basis of images from 2021 to 2023. In total, 78 glaciers and 57 glacierets were identified. UAV imagery and field inspection were used for validation. The total glaciated area has reduced from 8.5 to 3.1 km2, which is 50&amp;amp;ndash;75% for selected river basins, with slope morphological types decreasing the most. According to our opinion, the morphological classification requires clarification due to absence of hanging glaciers, described previously.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Glaciation in the Kuznetsky Alatau Mountains&amp;amp;mdash;Dynamics and Current State According to Sentinel-2 Satellite Images and Field Studies</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Maria Ananicheva</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Marina Adamenko</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Andrey Abramov</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2030009</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-08-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2030009</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/9</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/8">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 8: The Identification and Diagnosis of &amp;lsquo;Hidden Ice&amp;rsquo; in the Mountain Domain</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/8</link>
	<description>Morphological problems for distinguishing between glacier ice, glacier ice with a debris cover (debris-covered glaciers), and rock glaciers are outlined with respect to recognising and mapping these features. Decimal latitude&amp;amp;ndash;longitude [dLL] values are used for geolocation. One model for rock glacier formation and flow discusses the idea that they consist of &amp;amp;lsquo;mountain permafrost&amp;amp;rsquo;. However, signs of permafrost-derived ice, such as flow features, have not been identified in these landsystems; talus slopes in the neighbourhoods of glaciers and rock glaciers. An alternative view, whereby rock glaciers are derived from glacier ice rather than permafrost, is demonstrated with examples from various locations in the mountain domain, &amp;amp;#120123;&amp;amp;#120158;. A Google Earth and field examination of many rock glaciers shows glacier ice exposed below a rock debris mantle. Ice exposure sites provide ground truth for observations and interpretations stating that rock glaciers are indeed formed from glacier ice. Exposure sites include bare ice at the headwalls of cirques and above debris-covered glaciers; additionally, ice cliffs on the sides of meltwater pools are visible at various locations along the lengths of rock glaciers. Inspection using Google Earth shows that these pools can be traced downslope and their sizes can be monitored between images. Meltwater pools occur in rock glaciers that have been previously identified in inventories as being indictive of permafrost in the mountain domain. Glaciers with a thick rock debris cover exhibit &amp;amp;lsquo;hidden ice&amp;amp;rsquo; and are shown to be geomorphological units mapped as rock glaciers.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-07-15</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 8: The Identification and Diagnosis of &amp;lsquo;Hidden Ice&amp;rsquo; in the Mountain Domain</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/8">doi: 10.3390/glacies2030008</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Brian Whalley
		</p>
	<p>Morphological problems for distinguishing between glacier ice, glacier ice with a debris cover (debris-covered glaciers), and rock glaciers are outlined with respect to recognising and mapping these features. Decimal latitude&amp;amp;ndash;longitude [dLL] values are used for geolocation. One model for rock glacier formation and flow discusses the idea that they consist of &amp;amp;lsquo;mountain permafrost&amp;amp;rsquo;. However, signs of permafrost-derived ice, such as flow features, have not been identified in these landsystems; talus slopes in the neighbourhoods of glaciers and rock glaciers. An alternative view, whereby rock glaciers are derived from glacier ice rather than permafrost, is demonstrated with examples from various locations in the mountain domain, &amp;amp;#120123;&amp;amp;#120158;. A Google Earth and field examination of many rock glaciers shows glacier ice exposed below a rock debris mantle. Ice exposure sites provide ground truth for observations and interpretations stating that rock glaciers are indeed formed from glacier ice. Exposure sites include bare ice at the headwalls of cirques and above debris-covered glaciers; additionally, ice cliffs on the sides of meltwater pools are visible at various locations along the lengths of rock glaciers. Inspection using Google Earth shows that these pools can be traced downslope and their sizes can be monitored between images. Meltwater pools occur in rock glaciers that have been previously identified in inventories as being indictive of permafrost in the mountain domain. Glaciers with a thick rock debris cover exhibit &amp;amp;lsquo;hidden ice&amp;amp;rsquo; and are shown to be geomorphological units mapped as rock glaciers.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>The Identification and Diagnosis of &amp;amp;lsquo;Hidden Ice&amp;amp;rsquo; in the Mountain Domain</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Brian Whalley</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2030008</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-07-15</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2030008</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/8</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/7">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 7: Freshwater Thin Ice Sheet Monitoring and Imaging with Fiber Optic Distributed Acoustic Sensing</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/7</link>
	<description>Fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology can monitor vibrational strain of vast areas with fine spatial resolution at high sampling rates. The fiber optic cable portion of DAS may directly monitor, measure, and map potentially unsafe areas such as thin ice sheets. Once the fiber optic cable is emplaced, DAS can provide &amp;amp;ldquo;rapid-response&amp;amp;rdquo; information along the cable&amp;amp;rsquo;s length through remote sampling. A field campaign was performed to test the sensitivity of DAS to spatial variations within thin ice sheets. A pilot field study was conducted in the northeastern United States in which fiber-optic cable was deployed on the surface of a freshwater pond. Phase velocity transformations were used to analyze the DAS response to strike testing on the thin ice sheet. The study results indicated that the ice sheet was about 5 cm thick generally, tapering to about 3.5 cm within 2 m of the pond&amp;amp;rsquo;s edge and then disappearing at the margins. After validation of the pilot study&amp;amp;rsquo;s methodology, a follow-up experiment using DAS to collect on a rapidly deployed, surface-laid cable atop a larger freshwater pond was conducted. Using phase velocity transformations, the ice thickness along the fiber optic cable was estimated to be between 25.5 and 28 cm and confirmed via ice auger measurements along the fiber optic cable. This field campaign demonstrates the feasibility of employing DAS systems to remotely assess spatially variable properties on thin freshwater ice sheets.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-06-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 7: Freshwater Thin Ice Sheet Monitoring and Imaging with Fiber Optic Distributed Acoustic Sensing</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/7">doi: 10.3390/glacies2030007</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Meghan Quinn
		Adrian K. Doran
		Constantine Coclin
		Levi Cass
		Heath Turner
		</p>
	<p>Fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology can monitor vibrational strain of vast areas with fine spatial resolution at high sampling rates. The fiber optic cable portion of DAS may directly monitor, measure, and map potentially unsafe areas such as thin ice sheets. Once the fiber optic cable is emplaced, DAS can provide &amp;amp;ldquo;rapid-response&amp;amp;rdquo; information along the cable&amp;amp;rsquo;s length through remote sampling. A field campaign was performed to test the sensitivity of DAS to spatial variations within thin ice sheets. A pilot field study was conducted in the northeastern United States in which fiber-optic cable was deployed on the surface of a freshwater pond. Phase velocity transformations were used to analyze the DAS response to strike testing on the thin ice sheet. The study results indicated that the ice sheet was about 5 cm thick generally, tapering to about 3.5 cm within 2 m of the pond&amp;amp;rsquo;s edge and then disappearing at the margins. After validation of the pilot study&amp;amp;rsquo;s methodology, a follow-up experiment using DAS to collect on a rapidly deployed, surface-laid cable atop a larger freshwater pond was conducted. Using phase velocity transformations, the ice thickness along the fiber optic cable was estimated to be between 25.5 and 28 cm and confirmed via ice auger measurements along the fiber optic cable. This field campaign demonstrates the feasibility of employing DAS systems to remotely assess spatially variable properties on thin freshwater ice sheets.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Freshwater Thin Ice Sheet Monitoring and Imaging with Fiber Optic Distributed Acoustic Sensing</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Meghan Quinn</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Adrian K. Doran</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Constantine Coclin</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Levi Cass</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Heath Turner</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2030007</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-06-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-06-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>3</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2030007</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/3/7</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/6">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 6: Surface Water Extent Extraction in Prairie Environments Using Sentinel-1 Image-Pair Coherence</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/6</link>
	<description>Knowledge of surface water extent is critical for ecological and disaster monitoring. However, surface water extraction from optical satellite imagery is challenging due to the impact of weather. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) can penetrate cloud cover and has significant advantages for surface water mapping, but the classification accuracy might be limited by SAR&amp;amp;rsquo;s inherent properties and land cover, which have similar backscatter to surface water. This study finds that the accuracy of surface water extraction at the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) can be improved by combining interferometric coherence and backscatter for machine learning classification. This study performs time-series analysis on surface water and land to investigate their discrimination at different seasonal periods. The accuracy improvement of this method on Sentinel-1 images reached 10% during the seasons of fall and winter, where the combination of backscatter and coherence was proven to be efficient for separating water and land. Hence, our approaches of combining backscatter and coherence provide new insights for surface water extraction from SAR images in future studies.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-05-19</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 6: Surface Water Extent Extraction in Prairie Environments Using Sentinel-1 Image-Pair Coherence</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/6">doi: 10.3390/glacies2020006</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Peilin Chen
		Grant Gunn
		</p>
	<p>Knowledge of surface water extent is critical for ecological and disaster monitoring. However, surface water extraction from optical satellite imagery is challenging due to the impact of weather. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) can penetrate cloud cover and has significant advantages for surface water mapping, but the classification accuracy might be limited by SAR&amp;amp;rsquo;s inherent properties and land cover, which have similar backscatter to surface water. This study finds that the accuracy of surface water extraction at the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) can be improved by combining interferometric coherence and backscatter for machine learning classification. This study performs time-series analysis on surface water and land to investigate their discrimination at different seasonal periods. The accuracy improvement of this method on Sentinel-1 images reached 10% during the seasons of fall and winter, where the combination of backscatter and coherence was proven to be efficient for separating water and land. Hence, our approaches of combining backscatter and coherence provide new insights for surface water extraction from SAR images in future studies.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Surface Water Extent Extraction in Prairie Environments Using Sentinel-1 Image-Pair Coherence</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Peilin Chen</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Grant Gunn</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2020006</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-05-19</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2020006</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/6</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/5">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 5: Time Domain Vibration Analysis of Cracked Ice Shelf</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/5</link>
	<description>Understanding the effect of cracks on ice shelf vibrations is crucial for assessing their structural integrity, predicting possible breakup events, and understanding their interactions with the surrounding environment. In this work, a novel approach to modelling the simulation of cracked ice shelf vibrations using thin beam approximation along with cracked beam boundary conditions is proposed. A simplified model was used in which the ice shelf was modelled as a thin elastic plate floating on water of a constant depth. The crack was modelled as a connected spring condition, a model which is standard in other fields but which has not been applied to ice shelves. The boundary conditions assumed that there was no flow of energy into the open water, and two possible boundary conditions were considered: no pressure and no flux. The focus of this work is to show how we can simulate the motion of an ice shelf with a crack, and this is the first step towards modelling the effect of crack and crack propagation on ice shelf breakup.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-04-02</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 5: Time Domain Vibration Analysis of Cracked Ice Shelf</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/5">doi: 10.3390/glacies2020005</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Alyah Alshammari
		Michael H. Meylan
		</p>
	<p>Understanding the effect of cracks on ice shelf vibrations is crucial for assessing their structural integrity, predicting possible breakup events, and understanding their interactions with the surrounding environment. In this work, a novel approach to modelling the simulation of cracked ice shelf vibrations using thin beam approximation along with cracked beam boundary conditions is proposed. A simplified model was used in which the ice shelf was modelled as a thin elastic plate floating on water of a constant depth. The crack was modelled as a connected spring condition, a model which is standard in other fields but which has not been applied to ice shelves. The boundary conditions assumed that there was no flow of energy into the open water, and two possible boundary conditions were considered: no pressure and no flux. The focus of this work is to show how we can simulate the motion of an ice shelf with a crack, and this is the first step towards modelling the effect of crack and crack propagation on ice shelf breakup.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Time Domain Vibration Analysis of Cracked Ice Shelf</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Alyah Alshammari</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Michael H. Meylan</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2020005</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-04-02</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2020005</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/2/5</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/4">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 4: Glacial Thrusts: Implications for the Crustal Deformation of the Icy Satellites</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/4</link>
	<description>The icy satellites of the outer Solar System show surfaces strongly deformed by tectonic activity, which mostly shows wide strike-slip zones. The structural pattern recognized on such regions can be ascribed to the deformation observed on terrestrial analogs identified in glaciers, whose flow produces deformation structures that bear key information to compare and better understand the surface and subsurface development of the structures identified on icy satellites. Multiscale analysis is used to acquire local- and regional-scale datasets that are compared with icy satellite data. Glacier deformation structures are compared with those identified in a unique regional-scale investigation of the icy satellites. In this work, we present a review of the approach used for the comparison between glacial and icy satellite shear zone deformation. The comparison concerns the deformation styles observed in these bodies, with a particular emphasis on compressional structures, called thrusts, which are hardly detected on icy satellites. Thrusts occur on glaciers and are important for glacial flow, deformation compensation and fluid circulation. Here, we report the occurrence of glacial thrust to better understand the icy environment under deformation and make inferences on icy satellite shear zones. Thanks to fieldwork and remote sensing analyses, we can infer the potential location and development of such compressional structures on icy satellites, which are pivotal for the compensation of their tectonics. We analyze glacial deformation by considering the icy satellite context and we discuss their potential detection with data from current and future planetary missions. A total of five categories of thrusts are presented to understand the best method for their detection, and a conceptual model on icy satellite surface and subsurface structural pattern is proposed.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-03-10</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 4: Glacial Thrusts: Implications for the Crustal Deformation of the Icy Satellites</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/4">doi: 10.3390/glacies2010004</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Costanza Rossi
		Riccardo Pozzobon
		Mateo Martini
		Eliseo Flores
		Alice Lucchetti
		Maurizio Pajola
		Luca Penasa
		Giovanni Munaretto
		Filippo Tusberti
		Joel Beccarelli
		</p>
	<p>The icy satellites of the outer Solar System show surfaces strongly deformed by tectonic activity, which mostly shows wide strike-slip zones. The structural pattern recognized on such regions can be ascribed to the deformation observed on terrestrial analogs identified in glaciers, whose flow produces deformation structures that bear key information to compare and better understand the surface and subsurface development of the structures identified on icy satellites. Multiscale analysis is used to acquire local- and regional-scale datasets that are compared with icy satellite data. Glacier deformation structures are compared with those identified in a unique regional-scale investigation of the icy satellites. In this work, we present a review of the approach used for the comparison between glacial and icy satellite shear zone deformation. The comparison concerns the deformation styles observed in these bodies, with a particular emphasis on compressional structures, called thrusts, which are hardly detected on icy satellites. Thrusts occur on glaciers and are important for glacial flow, deformation compensation and fluid circulation. Here, we report the occurrence of glacial thrust to better understand the icy environment under deformation and make inferences on icy satellite shear zones. Thanks to fieldwork and remote sensing analyses, we can infer the potential location and development of such compressional structures on icy satellites, which are pivotal for the compensation of their tectonics. We analyze glacial deformation by considering the icy satellite context and we discuss their potential detection with data from current and future planetary missions. A total of five categories of thrusts are presented to understand the best method for their detection, and a conceptual model on icy satellite surface and subsurface structural pattern is proposed.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Glacial Thrusts: Implications for the Crustal Deformation of the Icy Satellites</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Costanza Rossi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Riccardo Pozzobon</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Mateo Martini</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Eliseo Flores</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Alice Lucchetti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Maurizio Pajola</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Luca Penasa</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Giovanni Munaretto</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Filippo Tusberti</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Joel Beccarelli</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2010004</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-03-10</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-03-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2010004</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/4</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/3">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 3: Computation of the Digital Elevation Model and Ice Dynamics of Talos Dome and the Frontier Mountain Region (North Victoria Land/Antarctica) by Synthetic-Aperture Radar (SAR) Interferometry</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/3</link>
	<description>In Antarctica, SAR interferometry has largely been used in coastal glacial areas, while in rare cases this method has been used on the Antarctic plateau. In this paper, the authors present a digital elevation and ice flow map based on SAR interferometry for an area encompassing Talos Dome (TD) and the Frontier Mountain (FM) meteorite site in North Victoria Land/Antarctica. A digital elevation model (DEM) was calculated using a double SAR interferometry method. The DEM of the region was calculated by extracting approximately 100 control points from the Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica (REMA). The two DEMs differ slightly in some areas, probably due to the penetration of the SAR-C band signal into the cold firn. The largest differences are found in the western area of TD, where the radar penetration is more pronounced and fits well with the layer structures calculated by the georadar and the snow accumulation observations. By differentiating a 70-day interferogram with the calculated DEM, a displacement interferogram was calculated that represents the ice dynamics. The resulting ice flow pattern clearly shows the catchment areas of the Priestley and Rennick Glaciers as well as the ice flow from the west towards Wilkes Basin. The ice velocity field was analysed in the area of FM. This area has become well known due to the search for meteorites. The velocity field in combination with the calculated DEM confirms the generally accepted theories about the accumulation of meteorites over the Antarctic Plateau.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-02-12</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 3: Computation of the Digital Elevation Model and Ice Dynamics of Talos Dome and the Frontier Mountain Region (North Victoria Land/Antarctica) by Synthetic-Aperture Radar (SAR) Interferometry</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/3">doi: 10.3390/glacies2010003</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Paolo Sterzai
		Nicola Creati
		Antonio Zanutta
		</p>
	<p>In Antarctica, SAR interferometry has largely been used in coastal glacial areas, while in rare cases this method has been used on the Antarctic plateau. In this paper, the authors present a digital elevation and ice flow map based on SAR interferometry for an area encompassing Talos Dome (TD) and the Frontier Mountain (FM) meteorite site in North Victoria Land/Antarctica. A digital elevation model (DEM) was calculated using a double SAR interferometry method. The DEM of the region was calculated by extracting approximately 100 control points from the Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica (REMA). The two DEMs differ slightly in some areas, probably due to the penetration of the SAR-C band signal into the cold firn. The largest differences are found in the western area of TD, where the radar penetration is more pronounced and fits well with the layer structures calculated by the georadar and the snow accumulation observations. By differentiating a 70-day interferogram with the calculated DEM, a displacement interferogram was calculated that represents the ice dynamics. The resulting ice flow pattern clearly shows the catchment areas of the Priestley and Rennick Glaciers as well as the ice flow from the west towards Wilkes Basin. The ice velocity field was analysed in the area of FM. This area has become well known due to the search for meteorites. The velocity field in combination with the calculated DEM confirms the generally accepted theories about the accumulation of meteorites over the Antarctic Plateau.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Computation of the Digital Elevation Model and Ice Dynamics of Talos Dome and the Frontier Mountain Region (North Victoria Land/Antarctica) by Synthetic-Aperture Radar (SAR) Interferometry</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Paolo Sterzai</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Nicola Creati</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Antonio Zanutta</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2010003</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-02-12</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2010003</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/3</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/2">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 2: River Ice Effects on Sediment Transport and Channel Morphology&amp;mdash;Progress and Research Needs</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/2</link>
	<description>Sediment transport in alluvial channels has a long history of intensive research. River ice could affect sediment transport and channel morphology through the impact of various dynamic and thermal ice processes. However, studies on sediment transport under the influence of ice have been minimal until recent years. This phenomenon was partially due to the complicated interactions between ice, flow, and sediment dynamics, which require a good understanding of the river ice process, in addition to the difficult field data collection conditions. This paper reviews the progress and needs of river ice-related research on sediment transport and channel morphology, including the influence of ice cover and surface ice runs on sediment transport, the effects of frazil ice, anchor ice, and bank stability with freeze-thaw effects.</description>
	<pubDate>2025-01-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 2: River Ice Effects on Sediment Transport and Channel Morphology&amp;mdash;Progress and Research Needs</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/2">doi: 10.3390/glacies2010002</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Hung Tao Shen
		</p>
	<p>Sediment transport in alluvial channels has a long history of intensive research. River ice could affect sediment transport and channel morphology through the impact of various dynamic and thermal ice processes. However, studies on sediment transport under the influence of ice have been minimal until recent years. This phenomenon was partially due to the complicated interactions between ice, flow, and sediment dynamics, which require a good understanding of the river ice process, in addition to the difficult field data collection conditions. This paper reviews the progress and needs of river ice-related research on sediment transport and channel morphology, including the influence of ice cover and surface ice runs on sediment transport, the effects of frazil ice, anchor ice, and bank stability with freeze-thaw effects.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>River Ice Effects on Sediment Transport and Channel Morphology&amp;amp;mdash;Progress and Research Needs</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Hung Tao Shen</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2010002</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-01-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2010002</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/2</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/1">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 1: Ice and Snow Scholarship: Challenges and Opportunities</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/1</link>
	<description>The issues that ice and snow scholars are defining and addressing are becoming more urgent, coupled with the increasing scope of such issues [...]</description>
	<pubDate>2025-01-22</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 2, Pages 1: Ice and Snow Scholarship: Challenges and Opportunities</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/1">doi: 10.3390/glacies2010001</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Steven R. Fassnacht
		</p>
	<p>The issues that ice and snow scholars are defining and addressing are becoming more urgent, coupled with the increasing scope of such issues [...]</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Ice and Snow Scholarship: Challenges and Opportunities</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Steven R. Fassnacht</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies2010001</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2025-01-22</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2025-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies2010001</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/2/1/1</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/8">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 111-129: Limitations of Drawdown Doline Development on Mountainous Glaciokarst</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/8</link>
	<description>In this study, we look for a relationship between the lack of drawdown dolines and the karren formation taking place on the bare surfaces of glaciokarsts. Along the profiles, the specific width and density of the most common karren such as rinnenkarren, grikes, and pits were studied, while in three mapped areas, the depth and depth change in rinnenkarren were investigated in various environments. Mainly, carbonate dissolution of a low degree takes place at atmospheric CO2. Therefore, in the case of carbonate dissolution taking place on the bare surfaces of glaciokarsts, the chance of cavity formation in the epikarst is analysed at karren of percolation origin (grike, pit) and at karren of flow origin (rinnenkarren). Vertical infiltration and local cavity formation are only possible at pits (the CO2 quantity increases due to the soil effect in them). Therefore, below the bare surfaces of glaciokarsts, as a result of low dissolution capacity and infiltration of low degree, there is no cavity formation, or it is weakly developed. The piezometric surface is absent or it is local, its surface is not deflected. Drainage is not heterogeneous, but it is local, which does not favour drawdown doline development since drawdown dolines develop in the case of epikarst with well-developed, heterogeneous cavitation and deflected piezometric surface.</description>
	<pubDate>2024-12-16</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 111-129: Limitations of Drawdown Doline Development on Mountainous Glaciokarst</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/8">doi: 10.3390/glacies1020008</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Márton Veress
		</p>
	<p>In this study, we look for a relationship between the lack of drawdown dolines and the karren formation taking place on the bare surfaces of glaciokarsts. Along the profiles, the specific width and density of the most common karren such as rinnenkarren, grikes, and pits were studied, while in three mapped areas, the depth and depth change in rinnenkarren were investigated in various environments. Mainly, carbonate dissolution of a low degree takes place at atmospheric CO2. Therefore, in the case of carbonate dissolution taking place on the bare surfaces of glaciokarsts, the chance of cavity formation in the epikarst is analysed at karren of percolation origin (grike, pit) and at karren of flow origin (rinnenkarren). Vertical infiltration and local cavity formation are only possible at pits (the CO2 quantity increases due to the soil effect in them). Therefore, below the bare surfaces of glaciokarsts, as a result of low dissolution capacity and infiltration of low degree, there is no cavity formation, or it is weakly developed. The piezometric surface is absent or it is local, its surface is not deflected. Drainage is not heterogeneous, but it is local, which does not favour drawdown doline development since drawdown dolines develop in the case of epikarst with well-developed, heterogeneous cavitation and deflected piezometric surface.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Limitations of Drawdown Doline Development on Mountainous Glaciokarst</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Márton Veress</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1020008</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-12-16</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-12-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1020008</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/8</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/7">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 92-110: Comparison of Multiple Methods for Supraglacial Melt-Lake Volume Estimation in Western Greenland During the 2021 Summer Melt Season</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/7</link>
	<description>Supraglacial melt-lakes form and evolve along the western edge of the Greenland Ice Sheet and have proven to play a significant role in ice sheet surface hydrology and mass balance. Prior methods to quantify melt-lake volume have relied upon Landsat-8 optical imagery, available at 30 m spatial resolution but with temporal resolution limited by satellite overpass times and cloud cover. We propose two novel methods to quantify the volume of meltwater stored in these lakes, including a high-resolution surface DEM (ArcticDEM) and an ablation model using daily averaged automated weather station data. We compare our methods to the depth-reflectance method for five supraglacial melt-lakes during the 2021 summer melt season. We find agreement between the depth-reflectance and DEM lake infilling methods, within +/&amp;amp;minus;15% for most cases, but our ablation model underproduces by 0.5&amp;amp;ndash;2 orders of magnitude the volumetric melt needed to match our other methods, and with a significant lag in meltwater onset for routing into the lake basin. Further information regarding energy balance parameters, including insolation and liquid precipitation amounts, is needed for adequate ablation modelling. Despite the differences in melt-lake volume estimates, our approach in combining remote sensing and meteorological methods provides a framework for analysis of seasonal melt-lake evolution at significantly higher spatial and temporal scales, to understand the drivers of meltwater production and its influence on the spatial distribution and extent of meltwater volume stored on the ice sheet surface.</description>
	<pubDate>2024-11-06</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 92-110: Comparison of Multiple Methods for Supraglacial Melt-Lake Volume Estimation in Western Greenland During the 2021 Summer Melt Season</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/7">doi: 10.3390/glacies1020007</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Nathan Rowley
		Wesley Rancher
		Christopher Karmosky
		</p>
	<p>Supraglacial melt-lakes form and evolve along the western edge of the Greenland Ice Sheet and have proven to play a significant role in ice sheet surface hydrology and mass balance. Prior methods to quantify melt-lake volume have relied upon Landsat-8 optical imagery, available at 30 m spatial resolution but with temporal resolution limited by satellite overpass times and cloud cover. We propose two novel methods to quantify the volume of meltwater stored in these lakes, including a high-resolution surface DEM (ArcticDEM) and an ablation model using daily averaged automated weather station data. We compare our methods to the depth-reflectance method for five supraglacial melt-lakes during the 2021 summer melt season. We find agreement between the depth-reflectance and DEM lake infilling methods, within +/&amp;amp;minus;15% for most cases, but our ablation model underproduces by 0.5&amp;amp;ndash;2 orders of magnitude the volumetric melt needed to match our other methods, and with a significant lag in meltwater onset for routing into the lake basin. Further information regarding energy balance parameters, including insolation and liquid precipitation amounts, is needed for adequate ablation modelling. Despite the differences in melt-lake volume estimates, our approach in combining remote sensing and meteorological methods provides a framework for analysis of seasonal melt-lake evolution at significantly higher spatial and temporal scales, to understand the drivers of meltwater production and its influence on the spatial distribution and extent of meltwater volume stored on the ice sheet surface.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Comparison of Multiple Methods for Supraglacial Melt-Lake Volume Estimation in Western Greenland During the 2021 Summer Melt Season</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Nathan Rowley</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Wesley Rancher</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Christopher Karmosky</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1020007</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-11-06</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-11-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1020007</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/7</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/6">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 80-91: Two-Step Glaciation of Antarctica: Its Tectonic Origin in Seaway Opening and West Antarctica Uplift</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/6</link>
	<description>The Cenozoic glaciation of Antarctica proceeded through two distinct steps around 35 and 15 million years ago. The first icing was attributed to thermal isolation due to the opening of the Drake/Tasman passages and the development of the Antarctic circumpolar current. I also subscribe to this &amp;amp;ldquo;thermal isolation&amp;amp;rdquo; but posit that, although the snowline was lowered below the Antarctic plateau for it to be iced over, the glacial line remains above sea level to confine the ice sheet to the plateau, a &amp;amp;ldquo;partial&amp;amp;rdquo; glaciation that would be sustained over time. The origin of the second icing remains unknown, but based on the sedimentary evidence, I posit that it was triggered when the isostatic rebound of West Antarctica caused by heightened erosion rose above the glacial line to be iced over by the expanding plateau ice, and the ensuing cooling lowered the glacial line to sea level to cause the &amp;amp;ldquo;full&amp;amp;rdquo; glaciation of Antarctica. To test these hypotheses, I formulate a minimal box model, which is nonetheless subjected to thermodynamic closure that allows a prognosis of the Miocene climate. Applying representative parameter values, the model reproduces the observed two-step icing followed by the stabilized temperature level, in support of the model physics.</description>
	<pubDate>2024-10-12</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 80-91: Two-Step Glaciation of Antarctica: Its Tectonic Origin in Seaway Opening and West Antarctica Uplift</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/6">doi: 10.3390/glacies1020006</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Hsien-Wang Ou
		</p>
	<p>The Cenozoic glaciation of Antarctica proceeded through two distinct steps around 35 and 15 million years ago. The first icing was attributed to thermal isolation due to the opening of the Drake/Tasman passages and the development of the Antarctic circumpolar current. I also subscribe to this &amp;amp;ldquo;thermal isolation&amp;amp;rdquo; but posit that, although the snowline was lowered below the Antarctic plateau for it to be iced over, the glacial line remains above sea level to confine the ice sheet to the plateau, a &amp;amp;ldquo;partial&amp;amp;rdquo; glaciation that would be sustained over time. The origin of the second icing remains unknown, but based on the sedimentary evidence, I posit that it was triggered when the isostatic rebound of West Antarctica caused by heightened erosion rose above the glacial line to be iced over by the expanding plateau ice, and the ensuing cooling lowered the glacial line to sea level to cause the &amp;amp;ldquo;full&amp;amp;rdquo; glaciation of Antarctica. To test these hypotheses, I formulate a minimal box model, which is nonetheless subjected to thermodynamic closure that allows a prognosis of the Miocene climate. Applying representative parameter values, the model reproduces the observed two-step icing followed by the stabilized temperature level, in support of the model physics.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Two-Step Glaciation of Antarctica: Its Tectonic Origin in Seaway Opening and West Antarctica Uplift</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Hsien-Wang Ou</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1020006</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-10-12</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-10-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>80</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1020006</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/2/6</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/5">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 57-79: Crafting Glacial Narratives: Virtual Exploration of Alpine Glacial and Periglacial Features in Preston Park, Glacier National Park, Montana, USA</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/5</link>
	<description>Virtual learning environments (VLEs) in physical geography education offer significant potential to aid students in acquiring the essential skills for the environmental interpretation of glacial and periglacial environments for geoscience careers. Simulated real-world field experiences aim to help the student evaluate landscapes for natural hazards, assess their intensity, and translate and communicate this information to various stakeholders in human systems. The TREE-PG framework and VRUI model provide a philosophical and practical foundation for VLE architects, aiming to cultivate students&amp;amp;rsquo; knowledge, skills, and identity as geoscientists, specifically as physical geographers and geomorphologists. These frameworks emphasize the importance of translating scientific knowledge from physical features into engaging, accessible online lessons, exemplified by landscapes like those in Glacier National Park, Montana. Open-source software and open educational resources (OERs) can broaden access and incorporate diverse perspectives in these experiences, which are necessary to address the impacts of vulnerable communities to global deglaciation. Designing and creating virtual proxies of field-based education may help address issues associated with inclusion and belonging within geoscience disciplines to connect all students with dynamic physical environments beyond the classroom. Ethical AI approaches and discipline-specific repositories are needed to ensure high-quality, contextually accurate VLEs. AI&amp;amp;rsquo;s tendency to produce output necessitates using domain-specific guardrails to maintain relevance and precision in virtual educational content.</description>
	<pubDate>2024-09-06</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 57-79: Crafting Glacial Narratives: Virtual Exploration of Alpine Glacial and Periglacial Features in Preston Park, Glacier National Park, Montana, USA</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/5">doi: 10.3390/glacies1010005</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Jacquelyn Kelly
		Dianna Gielstra
		Lynn Moorman
		Uwe Schulze
		Niccole V. Cerveny
		Johan Gielstra
		Rohana J. Swihart
		Scott Ramsey
		Tomáš J. Oberding
		David R. Butler
		Karen Guerrero
		</p>
	<p>Virtual learning environments (VLEs) in physical geography education offer significant potential to aid students in acquiring the essential skills for the environmental interpretation of glacial and periglacial environments for geoscience careers. Simulated real-world field experiences aim to help the student evaluate landscapes for natural hazards, assess their intensity, and translate and communicate this information to various stakeholders in human systems. The TREE-PG framework and VRUI model provide a philosophical and practical foundation for VLE architects, aiming to cultivate students&amp;amp;rsquo; knowledge, skills, and identity as geoscientists, specifically as physical geographers and geomorphologists. These frameworks emphasize the importance of translating scientific knowledge from physical features into engaging, accessible online lessons, exemplified by landscapes like those in Glacier National Park, Montana. Open-source software and open educational resources (OERs) can broaden access and incorporate diverse perspectives in these experiences, which are necessary to address the impacts of vulnerable communities to global deglaciation. Designing and creating virtual proxies of field-based education may help address issues associated with inclusion and belonging within geoscience disciplines to connect all students with dynamic physical environments beyond the classroom. Ethical AI approaches and discipline-specific repositories are needed to ensure high-quality, contextually accurate VLEs. AI&amp;amp;rsquo;s tendency to produce output necessitates using domain-specific guardrails to maintain relevance and precision in virtual educational content.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Crafting Glacial Narratives: Virtual Exploration of Alpine Glacial and Periglacial Features in Preston Park, Glacier National Park, Montana, USA</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Jacquelyn Kelly</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Dianna Gielstra</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Lynn Moorman</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Uwe Schulze</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Niccole V. Cerveny</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Johan Gielstra</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Rohana J. Swihart</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Scott Ramsey</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Tomáš J. Oberding</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>David R. Butler</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Karen Guerrero</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1010005</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-09-06</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-09-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1010005</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/5</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/4">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 35-56: Bootstrap Methods for Bias-Correcting Probability Distribution Parameters Characterizing Extreme Snow Accumulations</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/4</link>
	<description>Accurately quantifying the threat of collapse due to the weight of settled snow on the roof of a structure is crucial for ensuring structural safety. This quantification relies upon direct measurements of the snow water equivalent (SWE) of settled snow, though most weather stations in the United States only measure snow depth. The absence of direct load measurements necessitates the use of modeled estimates of SWE, which often results in the underestimation of the scale/variance parameter of the distribution of annual maximum SWE. This paper introduces a novel bias correction method that employs a bootstrap technique with regression-based models to calibrate the variance parameter of the distribution. The efficacy of this approach is demonstrated on real and simulated datasets. The findings reveal varied levels of success, with the efficacy of the proposed approach being inherently dependent on the quality of the selected regression-based model. These findings demonstrate that integrating our approach with a suitable regression-based model can produce unbiased or nearly unbiased annual maximum SWE distribution parameters in the absence of direct SWE measurements.</description>
	<pubDate>2024-08-07</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 35-56: Bootstrap Methods for Bias-Correcting Probability Distribution Parameters Characterizing Extreme Snow Accumulations</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/4">doi: 10.3390/glacies1010004</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Kenneth Pomeyie
		Brennan Bean
		</p>
	<p>Accurately quantifying the threat of collapse due to the weight of settled snow on the roof of a structure is crucial for ensuring structural safety. This quantification relies upon direct measurements of the snow water equivalent (SWE) of settled snow, though most weather stations in the United States only measure snow depth. The absence of direct load measurements necessitates the use of modeled estimates of SWE, which often results in the underestimation of the scale/variance parameter of the distribution of annual maximum SWE. This paper introduces a novel bias correction method that employs a bootstrap technique with regression-based models to calibrate the variance parameter of the distribution. The efficacy of this approach is demonstrated on real and simulated datasets. The findings reveal varied levels of success, with the efficacy of the proposed approach being inherently dependent on the quality of the selected regression-based model. These findings demonstrate that integrating our approach with a suitable regression-based model can produce unbiased or nearly unbiased annual maximum SWE distribution parameters in the absence of direct SWE measurements.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Bootstrap Methods for Bias-Correcting Probability Distribution Parameters Characterizing Extreme Snow Accumulations</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Kenneth Pomeyie</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Brennan Bean</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1010004</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-08-07</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1010004</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/4</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/3">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 19-34: Northern Hemisphere Glaciation: Its Tectonic Origin in the Neogene Uplift</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/3</link>
	<description>The Earth has cooled since the early Pliocene, which was punctuated by accelerated cooling indicative of thresholds. I posit that the cooling was initiated when the Neogene uplift of the Tibetan highland caused it to ice over, augmenting the albedo. I formulate a minimal warm/cold/Arctic box model to test this hypothesis and prognose the Pliocene climate. In particular, based on model physics, I discern three thermal thresholds as Pliocene cools: (1) when the Arctic temperature falls below the marking temperature of the ice front, the East Greenland ice sheet would descend to the sea level and calve into the Nordic Seas; (2) when the Arctic temperature cools to the freezing point, the ice sheet would form and expand over circum-Arctic lowlands to cause a massive deposition of ice-rafted debris marking Northern Hemisphere glaciation (NHG); (3) when glacial state persists through low eccentricity, it would cause a transition from obliquity- to eccentricity-dominated glacial cycles. Aligning these thresholds with the observed ones around 3.5, 2.7, and 1 million years ago, the model produces a temporal evolution of the Pliocene temperature as well as its driving albedo change. Since the latter can be accommodated by the observed one, it supports the Neogene uplift as the tectonic origin of NHG.</description>
	<pubDate>2024-07-21</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 19-34: Northern Hemisphere Glaciation: Its Tectonic Origin in the Neogene Uplift</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/3">doi: 10.3390/glacies1010003</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Hsien-Wang Ou
		</p>
	<p>The Earth has cooled since the early Pliocene, which was punctuated by accelerated cooling indicative of thresholds. I posit that the cooling was initiated when the Neogene uplift of the Tibetan highland caused it to ice over, augmenting the albedo. I formulate a minimal warm/cold/Arctic box model to test this hypothesis and prognose the Pliocene climate. In particular, based on model physics, I discern three thermal thresholds as Pliocene cools: (1) when the Arctic temperature falls below the marking temperature of the ice front, the East Greenland ice sheet would descend to the sea level and calve into the Nordic Seas; (2) when the Arctic temperature cools to the freezing point, the ice sheet would form and expand over circum-Arctic lowlands to cause a massive deposition of ice-rafted debris marking Northern Hemisphere glaciation (NHG); (3) when glacial state persists through low eccentricity, it would cause a transition from obliquity- to eccentricity-dominated glacial cycles. Aligning these thresholds with the observed ones around 3.5, 2.7, and 1 million years ago, the model produces a temporal evolution of the Pliocene temperature as well as its driving albedo change. Since the latter can be accommodated by the observed one, it supports the Neogene uplift as the tectonic origin of NHG.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Northern Hemisphere Glaciation: Its Tectonic Origin in the Neogene Uplift</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Hsien-Wang Ou</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1010003</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-07-21</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-07-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1010003</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/3</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/2">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 17-18: Glacies&amp;mdash;A New Open Access Journal</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/2</link>
	<description>Glacies means &amp;amp;ldquo;the ice&amp;amp;rdquo; in Latin [...]</description>
	<pubDate>2024-06-06</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 17-18: Glacies&amp;mdash;A New Open Access Journal</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/2">doi: 10.3390/glacies1010002</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Steven R. Fassnacht
		</p>
	<p>Glacies means &amp;amp;ldquo;the ice&amp;amp;rdquo; in Latin [...]</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Glacies&amp;amp;mdash;A New Open Access Journal</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Steven R. Fassnacht</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1010002</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-06-06</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-06-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1010002</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/2</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
        <item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/1">

	<title>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 1-16: Location Dictates Snow Aerodynamic Roughness</title>
	<link>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/1</link>
	<description>We conducted an experiment comparing wind speeds and aerodynamic roughness length (z0) values over three snow surface conditions, including a flat smooth surface, a wavy smooth surface, and a wavy surface with fresh snow added, using the wind simulation tunnel at the Shinjo Cryospheric Laboratory in Shinjo, Japan. The results indicate that the measurement location impacts the computed z0 values up to a certain measurement height. When we created small (4 cm high) snow bedforms as waves with a 50 cm period, the computed z0 values varied by up to 35% based on the horizontal sampling location over the wave (furrow versus trough). These computed z0 values for the smooth snow waves were not significantly different than those for the smooth flat snow surface. Fresh snow was then blown over the snow waves. Here, for three of four horizontal sampling locations, the computed z0 values were significantly different over the fresh snow-covered waves as compared to those over the smooth snow waves. Since meteorological stations are usually established over flat land surfaces, a smooth snow surface texture may seem to be an appropriate assumption when calculating z0, but the snowpack surface can vary substantially in space and time. Therefore, the nature of the snow surface geometry should be considered variable when estimating a z0 value, especially for modeling purposes.</description>
	<pubDate>2024-03-29</pubDate>

	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
	<p><b>Glacies, Vol. 1, Pages 1-16: Location Dictates Snow Aerodynamic Roughness</b></p>
	<p>Glacies <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/1">doi: 10.3390/glacies1010001</a></p>
	<p>Authors:
		Steven R. Fassnacht
		Kazuyoshi Suzuki
		Masaki Nemoto
		Jessica E. Sanow
		Kenji Kosugi
		Molly E. Tedesche
		Markus M. Frey
		</p>
	<p>We conducted an experiment comparing wind speeds and aerodynamic roughness length (z0) values over three snow surface conditions, including a flat smooth surface, a wavy smooth surface, and a wavy surface with fresh snow added, using the wind simulation tunnel at the Shinjo Cryospheric Laboratory in Shinjo, Japan. The results indicate that the measurement location impacts the computed z0 values up to a certain measurement height. When we created small (4 cm high) snow bedforms as waves with a 50 cm period, the computed z0 values varied by up to 35% based on the horizontal sampling location over the wave (furrow versus trough). These computed z0 values for the smooth snow waves were not significantly different than those for the smooth flat snow surface. Fresh snow was then blown over the snow waves. Here, for three of four horizontal sampling locations, the computed z0 values were significantly different over the fresh snow-covered waves as compared to those over the smooth snow waves. Since meteorological stations are usually established over flat land surfaces, a smooth snow surface texture may seem to be an appropriate assumption when calculating z0, but the snowpack surface can vary substantially in space and time. Therefore, the nature of the snow surface geometry should be considered variable when estimating a z0 value, especially for modeling purposes.</p>
	]]></content:encoded>

	<dc:title>Location Dictates Snow Aerodynamic Roughness</dc:title>
			<dc:creator>Steven R. Fassnacht</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kazuyoshi Suzuki</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Masaki Nemoto</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Jessica E. Sanow</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Kenji Kosugi</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Molly E. Tedesche</dc:creator>
			<dc:creator>Markus M. Frey</dc:creator>
		<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/glacies1010001</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source>Glacies</dc:source>
	<dc:date>2024-03-29</dc:date>

	<prism:publicationName>Glacies</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2024-03-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:doi>10.3390/glacies1010001</prism:doi>
	<prism:url>https://www.mdpi.com/2813-8740/1/1/1</prism:url>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="CC BY 4.0"/>
</item>
    
<cc:License rdf:about="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
</cc:License>

</rdf:RDF>
