Benchmark Models in Time Series Forecasting

A Special Issue of Forecasting (ISSN 2571-9394).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2027 | Viewed by 1226

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, Agricultural University of Athens, 1st Km of Old National Road Thebes-Elefsis, 32200 Thebes, Greece
Interests: benchmark; adaptive and parsimonious forecasting methods; forecasting in financial and economic time series; quantitative trading and Investment strategies

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Political Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
Interests: theoretical and applied econometrics; time series analysis and forecasting; adaptive learning forecasting; forecasting non-stationary time series; empirical finance; quantitative investment strategies; international macroeconomics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, Athens University of Economics and Business, 10434 Athens, Greece
Interests: mathematical economics; econometrics; statistics; probability theory
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Forecasting practice has long been shaped by a simple but powerful insight: uncomplicated methods often perform best in real-world, out-of-sample settings. Across disciplines such as economics, finance, energy, and operations, benchmark approaches—such as naive forecasts, exponential smoothing, and low-order autoregressive models—have consistently demonstrated robustness, transparency, and scalability. These methods succeed not despite their simplicity, but because of it: they adapt more effectively to structural change, avoid overfitting, and remain usable in practice.

This Special Issue is motivated by the view that simple benchmark forecasting methods often perform well in practice and builds on recent developments in the literature on benchmark methods in univariate time series forecasting. Our aim is to bring together contributions that extend, refine, or apply benchmark methods in modern forecasting environments.

We welcome submissions including, but not limited to:

  • The development of new benchmark methods or refinements of existing ones;
  • Predictive complexity and model selection in simple forecasting frameworks;
  • Comparative studies of benchmark versus complex models;
  • Applications in finance, economics, energy, and operations;
  • Robustness, structural change, and model stability;
  • Computationally efficient and scalable forecasting techniques.

Both methodological contributions and empirical applications are encouraged.

The goal of this Special Issue is to collect original research and review papers that provide new insights into univariate time series forecasting, with emphasis on methods that balance theoretical soundness with practical relevance. The topic aligns closely with the journal’s scope, focusing on mathematically grounded approaches that are also interpretable, scalable, and operational.

We look forward to receiving your original research articles and reviews.

Dr. Foteini Kyriazi
Prof. Dr. Dimitrios D. Thomakos
Dr. Stelios Arvanitis
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forecasting is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • benchmark models
  • new methodologies
  • forecasting
  • simplicity
  • parsimony

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 6578 KB  
Article
Forecasting Demand Under Limited Data: Benchmark Models for Workforce Capacity Planning in Translation Services
by Lorena Hernández-Mastrapa, Daniel René Tasé-Velázquez, Renato Máximo-Sátiro, Gelmar García-Vidal, Alexander Sánchez-Rodríguez and Reyner Pérez-Campdesuñer
Forecasting 2026, 8(5), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8050085 - 13 Sep 2026
Viewed by 158
Abstract
Demand variability complicates workforce capacity planning in knowledge-intensive services, particularly when only short historical records are available. This study evaluates parsimonious benchmark models for forecasting translation-service demand and translating the resulting forecasts into staffing requirements. The empirical analysis used 122 daily observations collected [...] Read more.
Demand variability complicates workforce capacity planning in knowledge-intensive services, particularly when only short historical records are available. This study evaluates parsimonious benchmark models for forecasting translation-service demand and translating the resulting forecasts into staffing requirements. The empirical analysis used 122 daily observations collected over six months from a translation team providing services in English and Spanish. Demand was measured as the number of words requested per working day, while nominal individual capacity was operationalized as 2000 translated words per day. Three benchmark forecasting methods—Naive, Mean, and Drift—were compared through expanding-window rolling-origin evaluation using ME, MAE, RMSE, MASE, and sMAPE. At the one-working-day horizon, the Mean benchmark achieved the lowest MAE (3221.66 words), RMSE (4424.81 words), MASE (0.845), and sMAPE (58.14%), and it maintained the lowest values for these measures at five- and twenty-working-day horizons. Re-estimated using all 122 observations, the Mean benchmark generated a point forecast of 5472.12 words per working day, equivalent to 2.74 translator-equivalents and a baseline requirement of three translators under the nominal productivity assumption. However, observed demand exceeded three-translator capacity on 34.43% of working days, indicating the need for flexible contingency capacity. The study provides a transparent framework connecting benchmark forecast evaluation with workforce-capacity decisions under limited temporal coverage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Benchmark Models in Time Series Forecasting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 454 KB  
Article
Does Machine Learning Improve Wind Power Forecasting? An Experimental Investigation
by Zhimin Li, Yu Chen, Tingzhao Yu, Ruyi Yang, Yan Huang, Kuoyin Wang, Yongyan Su, Jinbing Gao and Bin Yuan
Forecasting 2026, 8(5), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8050079 - 7 Sep 2026
Viewed by 197
Abstract
Accurate wind power forecasting is essential for the stable and economic operation of power systems with high renewable penetration. Although machine learning models have been widely adopted for this task, the assumption that greater model complexity invariably yields superior forecasting accuracy has received [...] Read more.
Accurate wind power forecasting is essential for the stable and economic operation of power systems with high renewable penetration. Although machine learning models have been widely adopted for this task, the assumption that greater model complexity invariably yields superior forecasting accuracy has received insufficient scrutiny. This paper presents a systematic experimental investigation that covers two complementary stages, i.e., wind speed correction and wind power forecasting. For wind speed correction, we compare 10 machine learning methods, including spanning linear, instance-based, and tree-based ensemble learners, under four newly proposed progressively enriched feature configurations. For wind power forecasting, we benchmark 20 methods spanning traditional machine learning, time-series deep learning, and Transformer-based architectures on two geographically distinct wind farms. Our results reveal a clear task-dependent pattern. In wind speed correction, tree-based ensemble methods, particularly gradient boosting variants, consistently dominate, and feature engineering contributes more to accuracy gains than model selection. In wind power forecasting, deep learning architectures substantially and consistently outperform traditional methods, with attention-based models generalizing the most robustly across regimes and recurrent networks proving to be the most sensitive to regime shifts. These findings provide actionable task-specific guidance for model selection in operational wind power forecasting systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Benchmark Models in Time Series Forecasting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1515 KB  
Article
Simulator-Grounded Benchmarking and a Corpus-Distilled Physics-Informed Forecaster for Fire Hazard-State and Damage Forecasting
by Dohun Kim, Seonghee Lee and In-Hwan Lee
Forecasting 2026, 8(4), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8040071 - 11 Aug 2026
Viewed by 403
Abstract
Forecasting research repeatedly finds that simple methods can match or beat complex ones out of sample. We test this in a safety-critical domain, near-real-time prediction of fire hazard state and structural damage, using a simulator-grounded benchmark: high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (Fire Dynamics Simulator, [...] Read more.
Forecasting research repeatedly finds that simple methods can match or beat complex ones out of sample. We test this in a safety-critical domain, near-real-time prediction of fire hazard state and structural damage, using a simulator-grounded benchmark: high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (Fire Dynamics Simulator, FDS) provides reference data, an FDS-calibrated zone model (CFAST) generates a large corpus cheaply, and the temperature trajectories drive a finite-element model (OpenSees) and a HAZUS/Eurocode-informed damage rule. Under one protocol we compare simple, deep (PatchTST, TimesNet), and physics-informed (PINN, PIKAN) forecasters. Complex models do not dominate: a small corpus lets parsimonious models approach best accuracy, and physics helps mainly when data are scarce (crossover near twenty scenarios). We propose CD-PINN, which identifies a data-optimal reduced-order physics residual from the corpus by physics-guided regression over a candidate library and uses it as the physics constraint. This lifts a per-event physics model to the accuracy of corpus-trained forecasters while staying interpretable. On 26 laboratory-fire experiments, however, in-distribution rankings do not transfer: the large accuracy spread collapses to near-parity, so a leaderboard poorly predicts laboratory-fire accuracy. For downstream damage, we further show that the label definition, not the model class, sets the achievable ceiling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Benchmark Models in Time Series Forecasting)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop