You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .

Diabetology

Diabetology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on diabetes research published monthly online by MDPI.

Quartile Ranking JCR - Q3 (Endocrinology and Metabolism)

All Articles (340)

Implementing the Physical Activity Vital Sign in a Pediatric Diabetes Center

  • Margaret M. McCarthy,
  • Jeniece Ilkowitz and
  • Jinyu Hu
  • + 1 author

Aims: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) initiative at a pediatric diabetes center was to integrate physical activity (PA) assessment into routine clinical care. This project had two aims: (1) to collect self-reported PA in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and (2) to analyze levels of PA (none, some PA, at-goal PA, and at-goal vs. not-at-goal PA) and their relationship with demographics and clinical outcomes. PA goals were 60 min/day for youth and 150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic PA for young adults. Methods: During clinical visits, a pediatric diabetes center used a three-question Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS) to assess and document PA, which was recorded as total minutes per week with intensity (light, moderate, and vigorous). We analyzed PAVS data from January 2020 to July 2022. Clinical variables were compared across the levels of PA. Results: This was a sample of 304 youth and young adults living with T1D: 87 young adults (29%) and 217 youth (71%), with a mean age of 14.2 (4.8) years. Half had an HbA1c between 7% (53.01 mmol/mol) and 9% (74.87 mmol/mol), and 56% used both continuous glucose monitoring and an insulin pump. Overall, 78% of the sample did not meet PA goals. LDL and blood pressure were significantly different across the two groups of PA achievement (not at goal vs. at goal). Only LDL levels remained significantly different across the three groups (none, some PA, and at-goal PA). Conclusions: Implementing PA assessment is feasible in a pediatric diabetes center. Next steps may include incorporating exercise prescriptions as part of routine clinical care.

4 December 2025

Comparing two physical activity groups: at goal and not at goal.

Background: Managing Type 1 diabetes (T1D) aims to optimize glucose within the target range while minimizing hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, yet exercise complicates glycemic outcomes. Despite advances, evidence is limited on how exercise relates to glycemic variability (GV) and hypoglycemia in automated insulin delivery (AID) and non-AID users, including evidence on GV’s temporal course before and after hypoglycemia, especially following long episodes. Objective: We aimed to characterize −48 to +48 h CGM trajectories around hypoglycemia, compare commercial AID and non-AID users, and assess modifiers (exercise, episode duration/severity, gender). Methods: This study analyzes the Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise Initiative (T1DEXI) dataset, assessing GV, hypoglycemia, gender, and exercise interactions in AID (n = 222) and non-AID (n = 276) users. The study examined patterns of glycemic metrics, including time below range (TBR) and glycemic variability surrounding hypoglycemia events, focusing on the 48 h before and after these events. We further assessed the impact of different hypoglycemia levels (41–50 mg/dL, 51–60 mg/dL, and 61–70 mg/dL) on post-event glucose stability. Results: Glycemic variability increased before and after hypoglycemia for up to 48 h in both AID and non-AID users, with statistically significant differences in GV metrics. TBR elevation persisted across all groups, peaking around hypoglycemic episodes. Notably, females using AID achieved significantly improved glucose stability compared to non-AID females, which is a larger within-group difference than that observed in males. Individual-level AID analyses revealed that long-duration hypoglycemia episodes (>40 min) resulted in prolonged TBR elevation, suggesting a slower recovery period despite AID intervention. Conclusions: GV trends may aid in predicting hypoglycemia over extended time periods. Integrating GV patterns into AID systems could improve glucose stability and mitigate hypoglycemia cycles, especially with the possible evaluation of hypoglycemia duration. Future research should explore hormonal influences (e.g., menstrual cycle effects) and inter-individual variability for optimized individual diabetes management.

4 December 2025

Three-staged individual-level analysis workflow, detailing data initialization and preprocessing, statistical analysis across defined time intervals around hypoglycemic episodes, and visualization of glucose variability progression before and after hypoglycemia.

Introduction: Advancements in diabetes technology have transformed diabetes management, yet technology implementation remains inconsistent due to barriers at both the clinician and patient levels. Team-based collaborative care offers a promising strategy to bridge these gaps. Framework: The Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), which incorporates the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, was applied to identify clinician and patient-level barriers to technology implementation and guide development of team-based strategies for improvement. Application of this framework is illustrated through a rural primary care clinic implementing a remote patient monitoring program. Results: Analysis across RE-AIM domains identified team-based, interprofessional strategies for enhancing technology implementation and sustainability. Recommended strategies include structured onboarding and digital literacy support for both patients and clinicians, clear delineation of team roles and intentional integration of workflows, continuous quality improvement through feedback and huddles, and sustained organizational and policy support that ensures security, reimbursement, and equitable access. Conclusions: Application of the PRISM framework to improve diabetes technology implementation allows for translation of technological innovation into meaningful outcomes.

4 December 2025

Recommendations for Enhancing RE-AIM Outcomes in Case Scenario Example. Abbreviations: Admin = administration; CCM = chronic care management; CGM = continuous glucose monitor; DSMES = diabetes self-management and support; IT = information technology; PCP = primary care provider; RPM = remote patient monitoring. * Clinic personnel may include PCP, nurse, CCM team member, DSMES educator, pharmacist, or others.

Background/Objectives: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a substantial health burden on foreign-born Haitian Americans (FBHAs) in the United States, who experience poorer health outcomes for T2D, in particular, cardiovascular disease and diabetes nephropathy. Understanding the factors that contribute to these disparities is essential. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between demographic, clinical, diabetes self-management, and social determinants of health (SDoH) factors with continuous glucose monitor (CGM-derived) glycemic indices in adult FBHAs with T2D. Methods: A cross-sectional exploratory correlation study was conducted in two urban health clinics, focusing on FBHAs aged 21 or older who had T2D for at least one year. Data were analyzed using SAS 6.4, employing descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and multiple regression models. Results: The study included 59 participants (49.2% male; mean age = 51.7 years, SD = 9.9), with an average T2D duration of 7.7 years (SD = 6.8) and an average of 1.63 (SD = 1.30) chronic diseases. A total of 29% were overweight while 21% had obesity with a mean HbA1c of 58 mmol/mol (7.5%). A higher body weight and poorer dietary habits were associated with elevated glucose levels (standardized β ≈ 0.25 and −0.24). Greater race-related stress was correlated with greater glucose variability (β ≈ 0.46). Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of addressing SDoH, such as race-related stress and food insecurity, to improve T2D self-management among FBHAs. Assessing and mitigating these risk factors can enhance glycemic control and health outcomes. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that CGM is feasible and acceptable for this population, showing exploratory findings and preliminary effect sizes that provide a strong basis for future, large-scale investigations.

2 December 2025

Participant recruitment process.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Reprints of Collections

Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Reprint

Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Cardiorenometabolic Syndrome and Its Components
Editors: Andrej Belančić, Bojan Jelaković, Martina Matovinović
Feature Papers in Diabetology 2023
Reprint

Feature Papers in Diabetology 2023

Editors: Peter Clifton

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Diabetology - ISSN 2673-4540