Geriatric Dentistry: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions

A Special Issue of Dentistry Journal (ISSN 2304-6767).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 September 2026) | Viewed by 2367

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Interests: bone regeneration; implant dentistry; dental implantology; biomaterials; osseointegration

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The global population is aging at an unprecedented rate, and oral health has become a critical component of healthy longevity. Older adults frequently present with complex oral conditions influenced not only by tooth loss and periodontal disease but also by systemic health issues and functional decline. In particular, oral frailty—a multidimensional deterioration of oral function—has emerged as an early indicator of general frailty and future disability. Moreover, growing evidence shows that poor oral health and reduced masticatory function are closely associated with cognitive impairment, including mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and various forms of dementia. Neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease further challenge oral self-care, chewing ability, and prosthetic management.

In this population, the burden of oral disease is often underestimated due to difficulties in maintaining oral hygiene, limited access to care, polypharmacy-induced xerostomia, and functional disability. Effective oral health strategies must therefore integrate disease prevention, personalized patient management, and caregivers’ support, while considering each patient’s cognitive status, comorbidities, and social context.

Digital dentistry offers transformative opportunities to improve diagnostics, treatment planning, and long-term maintenance in geriatric patients. The use of intraoral scanners, digital occlusal analysis, artificial intelligence–assisted diagnosis, 3D-printed prostheses, and remote monitoring platforms can provide safer, faster, and more predictable care—particularly for individuals with mobility limitations or neurocognitive disorders. Advances in digital workflows are also improving the fabrication accuracy of removable prostheses, guiding minimally invasive surgical procedures, and enabling new models of home- or facility-based oral care.

Despite these advances, many challenges remain. The heterogeneity of aging, the presence of multiple chronic diseases, and variations in cognitive and functional abilities require a tailored, interdisciplinary approach. There is an urgent need for robust clinical evidence to support preventive strategies, regenerative therapies, digital applications, and innovative care models for older adults. Understanding how systemic aging, neurodegeneration, and oral disease interact will be essential to improving quality of life and reducing the global burden of age-related oral health problems.

This Special Issue invites original research, clinical studies, technological developments, and comprehensive reviews related to geriatric dentistry. Submissions focusing on oral frailty, cognitive impairment and dementia, neurodegenerative disorders, interdisciplinary care pathways, digital dentistry applications, preventive programs, prosthetic rehabilitation, regenerative strategies, and long-term maintenance in elderly patients are particularly encouraged. Contributions that bridge basic science, clinical practice, and public health perspectives will help define the future of geriatric oral healthcare.

We look forward to receiving your high-quality work that will advance our understanding of aging-related oral health and foster innovative approaches for improving dental care in older adults.

Dr. Jung-Tae Lee
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Dentistry Journal is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • periodontal diseases
  • dementia
  • geriatric dentistry
  • parkinson disease
  • frailty
  • frail elderly
  • aged

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 992 KB  
Article
Subjective Xerostomia and Chairside Salivary Dysfunction in Institutionalized Older Adults: Concordance and Exploratory Derivation of a Five-Item Short Form
by Mădălina Monica Bicheru, Andreea Zamfirescu, Elena Preoteasa, Adrian Iustin Georgevici, Nicolae Vladimir Bicheru and Cristina Teodora Preoteasa
Dent. J. 2026, 14(9), 557; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14090557 - 2 Sep 2026
Viewed by 220
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In institutionalized older adults, we examined the concordance between self-reported xerostomia and chairside salivary dysfunction and explored whether a smaller subset of Xerostomia Inventory items could retain comparable screening performance. Methods: This cross-sectional study included institutionalized older adults. The 11-item [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: In institutionalized older adults, we examined the concordance between self-reported xerostomia and chairside salivary dysfunction and explored whether a smaller subset of Xerostomia Inventory items could retain comparable screening performance. Methods: This cross-sectional study included institutionalized older adults. The 11-item Xerostomia Inventory was compared with a six-marker chairside whole-saliva panel, with all variables scaled 0 (normal) to 1 (pathological). We measured how closely symptoms tracked each objective marker, how well the questionnaire identified hyposalivation, and whether fewer questions could be comparable with the full 11-item inventory. Results: The study included 90 participants, with a mean age of 79.5 years; 55.6% were women. Symptoms tracked every marker in the expected direction (correlation τ-b 0.32 to 0.62). The questionnaire identified objective hyposalivation with an area under the ROC curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.78–0.96) and substantial chance-corrected agreement (Cohen’s κ 0.69, 95% CI 0.51–0.87). A five-item short form reproduced the objective findings as well as the full questionnaire did (cross-validated R2 0.56 ± 0.03 versus 0.56). Conclusions: In this high-prevalence institutional cohort, self-reported symptoms agreed with graded salivary function more closely than the older discordance literature would suggest, though still within the range of recent studies rather than beyond it. A five-item subset, chosen for its alignment with the objective salivary axis rather than for internal consistency, recovered as much as the full inventory, which points to a short, function-oriented score as a plausible first-stage screen. We would treat this short form as a candidate first-stage screening approach that requires external validation, rather than as a replacement for objective salivary assessment or as a validated replacement for the Xerostomia Inventory. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geriatric Dentistry: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop