Special Issue "Observation and Modeling of Ionosphere: Recent Trends, Current Progress and Future Directions"

A special issue of Atmosphere (ISSN 2073-4433). This special issue belongs to the section "Atmospheric Techniques, Instruments, and Modeling".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 February 2023) | Viewed by 1512

Special Issue Editors

Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China
Interests: Ionospheric modelling; space weather monitoring; seismic–ionospheric effect; deep learning
College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266510, China
Interests: GNSS TEC; ionosphere anomaly; seismology–ionosphere coupling; GNSS atmosphere; space geodesy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Key Laboratory of Land Environment and Disaster Monitoring, Ministry of Natural Resources, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Interests: GNSS; Ionospheric scintillation; positioning and navigation
School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
Interests: GNSS; ionospheric delay; digital construction; geospatial
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The ionosphere reflects and modifies radio waves used for communication and the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of its variation. It contains day-to-day spatial/temporal variabilities and small-scale plasma disturbances, e.g., traveling ionospheric disturbance, ionospheric irregularities, and plasma bubbles. Hence, the development of high-accuracy ionospheric models remains challenging.

Rapid development of the cutting-edge multi-GNSS systems and low-orbit radio occultation systems, e.g., COSMIC-1/2, FY-3C/D, massive ground and spaceborne geodetic observations, provides unprecedented opportunities for high-accuracy ionospheric monitoring, modeling, and other associated applications. Taking advantage of these multi-source data, this Special Issue aims to present new studies on these topics, including (but not limited to):

  • Ground and spaceborne GNSS observation processing.
  • Ionospheric monitoring.
  • Ionospheric modeling.
  • Ionospheric irregularity and scintillation.
  • Ionospheric response to severe space events and natural disasters, e.g., earthquakes, typhoons, tsunamis, etc.
  • Other ionosphere-associated studies.

Dr. Wang Li
Prof. Dr. Jinyun Guo
Dr. Dongsheng Zhao
Dr. Craig M. Hancock
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Atmosphere is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • GNSS
  • ionospheric monitoring
  • ionospheric modeling
  • ionospheric irregularities
  • ionospheric scintillation
  • ionospheric radio occultation
  • geomagnetic storm
  • ionospheric response to natural disasters

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Article
An Ionospheric Total Electron Content Model with a Storm Option over Japan Based on a Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network
Atmosphere 2023, 14(4), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14040634 - 27 Mar 2023
Viewed by 283
Abstract
Ionospheric delay has a severe effect on reducing the accuracy of positioning and navigation of single-frequency receivers. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a precise regional ionospheric model for real-time Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications. The total electron contents (TECs) of 839 [...] Read more.
Ionospheric delay has a severe effect on reducing the accuracy of positioning and navigation of single-frequency receivers. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a precise regional ionospheric model for real-time Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications. The total electron contents (TECs) of 839 GNSS stations affiliated with the GPS Earth Observation Network were used to build a Japanese ionospheric model (JIM) based on a multi-layer perceptron neural network. During quiet space conditions, the correlation coefficient between the targets and the predictions of the JIM was about 0.98, and the root-mean square error (RMSE) of TEC residuals was ~1.5TECU, while under severe space events, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.99, and the corresponding RMSE dropped to 0.96 TECU. Moreover, the JIM model successfully reconstructed the two-dimensional (time vs latitude) TEC maps, and the TEC maps had evident hourly and seasonal variations. Most of TEC residuals accumulated between universal time 01–06 with an averaged magnitude of 1-2TECU. Furthermore, the JIM model had a perfect prediction performance under various kinds of complex space environments. In the quiet days, the prediction accuracy of the JIM was nearly equal to the global ionosphere map (GIM), and in some moments, the JIM was more competitive than the GIM. In the disturbed days, the RMSEs of TEC residuals were proportional to the solar wind speed and were inversely proportional to the geomagnetic Dst value. The maximum RMSE of the JIM was lower than 2TECU, while the corresponding RMSEs for the IRI and TIE-GCM exceeded 5TECU. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Article
Integrated Analysis of Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionospheric Coupling Associated with the 2021 Mw 7.2 Haiti Earthquake
Atmosphere 2023, 14(2), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020347 - 09 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 811
Abstract
The search for Earthquake (EQ) precursors in the ionosphere and atmosphere from satellite data has provided significant information about the upcoming main shock. This study presents the abnormal atmospheric and ionospheric perturbations associated with the Mw 7.2 Haiti EQ on 14 August [...] Read more.
The search for Earthquake (EQ) precursors in the ionosphere and atmosphere from satellite data has provided significant information about the upcoming main shock. This study presents the abnormal atmospheric and ionospheric perturbations associated with the Mw 7.2 Haiti EQ on 14 August 2021 at geographical coordinates (18° N, 73° W) and shallow hypocentral depth of 10 km from the data of permanent Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations near the epicenter, followed by Swarm satellites data. The total vertical electron (VTEC) anomalies occur within a 5-day window before the main shock in the analysis of nearby operation stations, followed by Swarm (A and C satellites) ionospheric anomalies in the same 5-day window before the main shock. Moreover, the geomagnetic activities are completely quiet within 10 days before and 10 days after the main shock. Similarly, the atmospheric parameters endorse the EQ anomalies within 5 days before the main shock day. The evolution of gases from the lithosphere at the epicentral region possessed significant atmospheric and ionospheric perturbations within the EQ preparation period of 5-day before the main shock under the hypothesis of Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop