PT J
AU Lanza, G
   Pucci, P
   Carboni, L
AF Lanza, Giovanni
   Pucci, Paola
   Carboni, Luigi
TI Measuring accessibility by proximity for an inclusive city
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Accessibility by proximity; Accessibility tools; Walkability; Cyclability; Mobility
ID built environment; physical-activity; self-selection; walkability; walking; index; travel; transport; mobility; tool
AB Accessibility is a relevant condition for social inclusion, depending on both context (transport system, land use patterns, temporal availability) and individual features. Based on this, it may be used for measuring people's ability to participate in social life and activities that contribute to their well-being. With the aim of dealing with the accessibility by proximity concept, this paper proposes an Inclusive Accessibility by Proximity Index (IAPI), conceived as a tool for assessing accessibility levels to services and activities deemed essential for local in-habitants, while recognizing the impact of the physical and perceptual characteristics of urban spaces and paths on active mobility. By considering the needs and habits of different mobility profiles in relation to the spaces and paths they live and cross daily, IAPI can help direct the construction of planning and urban design measures aimed at promoting walkability and cyclability and improving accessibility via active modes, thus envisioning a more sustainable and inclusive city. Taking a cue from the experience conducted in the testbed of Bologna (Italy), this paper describes the methodology for constructing and applying the index, presents the results obtained, and outlines the steps to make the tool scalable and sensitive to the different contexts.
C1 [Lanza, Giovanni; Pucci, Paola; Carboni, Luigi] Politecn Milan, DAStU, Via Bonardi 3, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
C3 Polytechnic University of Milan
RP Pucci, P (通讯作者)，Politecn Milan, DAStU, Via Bonardi 3, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
EM paola.pucci@polimi.it
FU JPI Urban Europe ERA-NET; Urban Accessibility and Connectivity (ENUAC); EX-TRA project
CR Abdelfattah L, 2021, P 57 ISOCARP WORLD P, V0, P582
   Adey P, 2021, MOBILITIES-UK, V16, P1, DOI 10.1080/17450101.2021.1872871
   Adkins A, 2012, J URBAN DES, V17, P499, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2012.706365
   Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Appleyard B, 2016, J TRANSP LAND USE, V9, P121, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2016.786
   Arellana J, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V139, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.010
   Arellana J, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P183, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
   Basu R, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V163, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2022.06.007
   Beale L, 2006, CARTOGR J, V43, P68, DOI 10.1179/000870406X93517
   Blecic I, 2015, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V29, P1350, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2015.1026824
   Boeing G, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
   Borst HC, 2009, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V29, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.002
   Buck C, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P1191, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.011
   Buttner B, 2022, URBAN MOBILITY NEXT 9 15-MINUTE CITY: HUMAN-CENTRED PLANNING IN ACTION MOBILITY FOR MORE LIVEABLE URBAN SPACES EIT, V0, P0
   Caiello S, 2022, APPL MOBIL, V7, P107, DOI 10.1080/23800127.2020.1794306
   Campisi T, 2021, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V40, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100592
   Cao XY, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P487, DOI 10.1068/a4269
   Cao XY, 2006, TRANSPORTATION, V33, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11116-005-7027-2
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Chan ETH, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102949
   Clifton KJ, 2019, TRANSFERABILITY AND FORECASTING OF THE PEDESTRIAN INDEX OF THE ENVIRONMENT (PIE) FOR MODELING APPLICATIONS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.15760/trec.218
   Clifton KJ, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   Currie G, 2010, TRANSPORTATION, V37, P953, DOI 10.1007/s11116-010-9280-2
   De Vos J, 2023, TRANSPORT REV, V43, P303, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2022.2101072
   Erath A, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP51, DOI 10.3141/2661-06
   Evans G, 2009, BUILT ENV LONDON 197, V35, P366, DOI 10.2148/benv.35.3.366
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Farrington J, 2005, JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, V13, P1, DOI 10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2004.10.002
   Farrington JH, 2007, J TRANSP GEOGR, V15, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.007
   Ferreira A, 2003, SUSTAINABLE URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE: APPROACHES, V0, P123
   Ferreira A, 2017, APPL MOBIL, V2, P16, DOI 10.1080/23800127.2017.1283121
   Ferreira A, 2007, TOWN PLAN REV, V78, P429, DOI 10.3828/tpr.78.4.3
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Frank LD, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P75, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976725
   Fraser SDS, 2011, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, P738, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckq145
   Gaglione F, 2022, CITIES, V127, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103724
   Gardner K, 1996, ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION OF LAND-USE AND TRANSPORT STRATEGIES: REVIEW, V0, P0
   Geurs KT, 2004, J TRANSP GEOGR, V12, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Glazier RH, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085295
   Guo Z, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.013
   Handy S, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P55, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976724
   Handy S, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102319
   Hoogendoorn SP, 2004, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V38, P169, DOI 10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00007-9
   Iacono M, 2010, J TRANSP GEOGR, V18, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.002
   Jehle U, 2022, J URBAN MOBIL, V2, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100025
   Jian IY, 2020, HABITAT INT, V97, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102122
   Kaufmann V, 2004, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V28, P745, DOI 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x
   Kelly CE, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1500, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.001
   Kenyon A, 2019, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V9, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100461
   Kenyon S, 2002, JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, V10, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1
   King D, 2020, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D, V0, P83
   Koh PP, 2013, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V36, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.001
   Krizek KJ, 2003, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V69, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944360308978019
   Lanza G, 2022, CITIES LEARNING FROM A PANDEMIC: TOWARDS PREPAREDNESS, V0, P0
   Leslie E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
   Levine J, 2019, MOBILITY ACCESSIBILI, V0, P0
   Lowry MB, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP41, DOI 10.3141/2314-06
   Lucas K, 2012, TRANSPORT POLICY, V20, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Manzini E, 2021, ABITARE LA PROSSIMITA: IDEE PER LA CITTA DEI 15 MINUTI, V0, P0
   Martens K, 2017, TRANSPORT JUSTICE: DESIGNING FAIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, V0, P1
   Mitropoulos L, 2023, J TRANSP GEOGR, V108, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103566
   Moreno C, 2016, TRIBUNE, V0, P0
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Moura F, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Newman P, 2006, OPOLIS, V2, P35
   Nourian P, 2018, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V7, P101, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-10-2017-0058
   OSullivan F, 2020, CITYLAB. FEBRUARY 18, V0, P0
   Pajares E, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V93, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103080
   Park S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP126, DOI 10.3141/2464-16
   Porta S, 2005, URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, V10, P51, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000136
   Portegijs E, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14030333
   Pot FJ, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V94, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103090
   Preston J, 2007, J TRANSP GEOGR, V15, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
   Pucci P, 2019, SPRINGERBR APPL SCI, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-19581-6
   Pucci P, 2022, TERRITORIO, V99, P40
   Pucci P, 2019, APPL GEOGR, V107, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.04.002
   Rafiemanzelat R, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V24, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.074
   Rebecchi A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11102778
   Ribeiro AI, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15122767
   Saelens BE, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1552, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
   Scannavini R, 2020, AL CENTRO DI BOLOGNA (1965-2015) MEZZO SECOLO DI URBANISTICA, V0, P0
   Shatu F, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V74, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.005
   Silva C, 2017, TRANSPORT POLICY, V53, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.09.006
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   State Government of Victoria, 2017, MELBOURNE PLAN, V0, P0
   Talavera-Garcia R, 2015, CITIES, V45, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003
   Transport for London, 2020, ASSESSING PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY LEVEL IN LONDON (PTAL), V0, P0
   van der Veen AS, 2020, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V8, P1360, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2020.09.007
   Wenger E, 1998, COMMUNITIES PRACTICE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Witten K, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN A, V43, P205, DOI 10.1068/a43219
   Zakaria J, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V170, P642, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.066
NR 92
TC 29
Z9 35
U1 6
U2 55
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC 15
PY 2023
VL 143
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104581
EA OCT 2023
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA W4ZP1
UT WOS:001091727500001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Sargoni, OT
   Manley, E
AF Sargoni, Obi Thompson
   Manley, Ed
TI Neighbourhood-level pedestrian navigation using the construal level theory
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Construal level theory; route choice; path finding; pedestrians; agent-based model
ID crossing behavior; model; impacts; quality; design; roads
AB Pedestrian navigation decisions take place simultaneously at multiple spatial scales. Yet most models of pedestrian behaviour focus either on local physical interactions or optimisation of routes across a road network. We present a novel hierarchical pedestrian route choice framework that integrates dynamic, perceptual decisions at the street level with abstract, network-based decisions at the neighbourhood level. The framework is based on construal level theory which states that decision makers construe decisions based on their psychological distance from the object of the decision. We implement this route choice framework in a spatial agent-based model in which pedestrian and vehicle agents complete trips in an urban environment. Using global sensitivity analysis techniques, we demonstrate the interaction between route choice components representing decision making at different spatial and temporal scales. Additionally, through comparison to a least cost network model, we demonstrate the increased route heterogeneity produced by this approach. This work could form the basis of an alternative method for producing pedestrian route alternatives. The granularity and scale of the modelled pedestrian trajectories could also help improve appraisals of street infrastructure.
C1 [Sargoni, Obi Thompson] UCL, London, England.
   [Manley, Ed] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds, England.
   [Sargoni, Obi Thompson] UCL, Bartlett Ctr Adv Spatial Anal, 90 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 4TJ, England.
C3 University of London; University College London; University of Leeds; University of London; University College London
RP Sargoni, OT (通讯作者)，UCL, Bartlett Ctr Adv Spatial Anal, 90 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 4TJ, England.
EM obi.sargoni.18@ucl.ac.uk
CR Amit E, 2009, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V138, P400, DOI 10.1037/a0015835
   Anciaes P, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V134, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.003
   Anciaes PR, 2019, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V15, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2019.01.006
   Anciaes PR, 2018, TRANSPORT POLICY, V64, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.01.007
   Anciaes PR, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP39, DOI 10.3141/2586-05
   APPLEYARD D, 1972, J AM I PLANNERS, V38, P84, DOI 10.1080/01944367208977410
   Ariely D, 2001, ACTA PSYCHOL, V108, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00034-8
   Boeing G, 2019, APPL NETW SCI, V4, P0, DOI 10.1007/s41109-019-0189-1
   Bornioli A, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V123, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.006
   Cantillo V, 2015, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V32, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.008
   Coeugnet S, 2019, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V65, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.011
   Crooks A, 2018, COMPREHENSIVE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL 1: GIS METHODS AND TECHNIQUES, P218
   Dey D, 2019, AUTOMOTIVEUI19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE USER INTERFACES AND INTERACTIVE VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS, V0, PP369, DOI 10.1145/3342197.3344523
   Dijkstra EW, 1959, NUMENSCHE MATH, V1, P269, DOI 10.1007/BF01386390
   Edmonds B, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3415, P130
   Edmonds B, 2019, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V22, P0, DOI 10.18564/jasss.3993
   Feliciani C, 2017, INTELL ARTIF, V11, P117, DOI 10.3233/IA-170110
   Filomena G, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244099
   Gershenson C, 2005, MANAGING COMPLEX, V1, P47
   Golledge RG, 1999, WAYFINDING BEHAVIOR, V0, P5
   Golman R, 2020, PSYCHOL REV, V127, P477, DOI 10.1037/rev0000176
   HARRELL WA, 1991, J SOC PSYCHOL, V131, P367, DOI 10.1080/00224545.1991.9713863
   Helbing D, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN B, V28, P361, DOI 10.1068/b2697
   Heppenstall A, 2016, SYSTEMS-BASEL, V4, P0, DOI 10.3390/systems4010009
   Herman J, 2017, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V2, P97, DOI 10.21105/joss.00097
   HIRTLE SC, 1985, MEM COGNITION, V13, P208, DOI 10.3758/BF03197683
   Jiang YY, 2019, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR, V25, P2886, DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865945
   Kerstholt JH, 2002, DECISION MAKING COGN, V0, P0
   Kielar PM, 2018, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V14, P406, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2017.1309472
   Kitazawa K, 2010, PEDESTRIAN AND EVACUATION DYNAMICS 2008, V0, PP95, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04504-2_7
   KrauSS S, 1998, MICROSCOPIC MODELING OF TRAFFIC FLOW: INVESTIGATION OF COLLISION FREE VEHICLE DYNAMICS, V0, P0
   Liberman N, 1998, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V75, P5, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
   López-Lambas ME, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V22, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101133
   Macdonald E, 2018, J URBAN DES, V23, P71, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2017.1340092
   Markkula G, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P153, DOI 10.1177/0361198118792131
   Moussaïd M, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P6884, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1016507108
   North MJ, 2013, COMPLEX ADAPT SYST M, V1, P0, DOI 10.1186/2194-3206-1-3
   Papadimitriou E, 2016, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V92, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.022
   Papadimitriou E, 2012, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V15, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.007
   Passini R, 1984, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, V4, P153, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80031-6
   Saltelli A, 2008, GLOBAL SENSITIVITY A, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470725184
   Sevtsuk A, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V25, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.010
   Talen Emily, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE LAND USE URBAN PLANNING, V1, P42, DOI 10.24102/ijslup.v1i1.211
   Tianjiao Wang, 2010, 2010 13TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC 2010), V0, PP1295, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625157
   Tong YH, 2022, J R SOC INTERFACE, V19, P0, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2022.0061
   Tong YH, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V124, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102909
   Torrens PM, 2012, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V102, P35, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2011.595658
   Trope Y, 2003, PSYCHOL REV, V110, P403, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
   Trope Y, 2010, PSYCHOL REV, V117, P440, DOI 10.1037/a0018963
   Trope Yaacov, 2011, HANDBOOK OF THEORIES OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, V1, P0
   Wang, 2012, THESIS U SOUTHAMPTON, V0, P0
   Wang YJ, 2021, PHYSICA A, V562, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125327
   Willis A, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P805, DOI 10.1068/b3060
   Woodcock J, 2009, LANCET, V374, P1930, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61714-1
   Wozniak-Prus M, 2022, J PERS ASSESS, V104, P736, DOI 10.1080/00223891.2021.2014505
   Yan DF, 2016, J CONSUM RES, V43, P598, DOI 10.1093/jcr/ucw045
   Zhou RG, 2009, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V41, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.007
NR 57
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 15
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 8
BP 2151
EP 2170
DI 10.1177/23998083231158371
EA FEB 2023
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA W4GZ7
UT WOS:000939383700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Chang, M
   Lee, GB
   Lee, JH
AF Chang, Mi
   Lee, Gi-bbeum
   Lee, Ji-Hyun
TI Analysis of urban visitor walkability based on mobile data: The case of Daejeon, Korea
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban visitor; Walkability; Mobile-based data; Community detection; Spatial-temporal network
ID walk score(r); neighborhood walkability; accessibility; city; districts; health; impact
AB The walkability of destinations plays a decisive role in obtaining a sense of place for urban visitors. For an improved walkability-based visit experience, the city structure can be analyzed by dividing it into small units, starting with the destination. However, existing studies focus on the walkability of residents by administrative district and use limited contextual information and structural analysis tools. Therefore, this study aims to structurally understand walkability through network analysis with mobile-based visitor data collected from 822 point-of-interest (POI) in Daejeon. In this study, the actual walking distance between 95,817 cells with visitors and POIs was measured to calculate the edge weight and influence of cells on POI. We analyzed the POI-cell network through edge weight and extracted nine communities to understand the city context through POI analysis and derived the following findings. First, it is possible to determine the potential demand by visitors' walkability-based division. Second, our walkability measurement method follows a bottom-up approach, starting with a small unit cell, understanding the entire city as a community extraction model, and possibly extending to other cities in Korea. Third, POI-centered structural analysis is possible using the number of visitors and distance in the proposed network analysis method.
C1 [Chang, Mi; Lee, Gi-bbeum; Lee, Ji-Hyun] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Culture Technol, Daejeon, South Korea.
   [Chang, Mi] Elect & Telecommun Res Inst ETRI, Mobil UX Res Sect, Daejeon, South Korea.
C3 Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology (KAIST); Electronics & Telecommunications Research Institute - Korea (ETRI)
RP Lee, JH (通讯作者)，Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Culture Technol, Daejeon, South Korea.
EM jihyunlee@kaist.ac.kr
FU National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (NRF -PM Support Program)
CR Abdelfattah L, 2022, TEMA, V0, PP71, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/8653
   Ashworth G, 2011, TOURISM MANAGE, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.002
   Bahrainy H, 2013, CITIES, V31, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.001
   Balletto G, 2022, CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.31428/10317/10466
   Beerli A, 2004, ANN TOURISM RES, V31, P657, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.010
   Brown SC, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V45, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.021
   Budruk M, 2008, J HERIT TOUR, V3, P185, DOI 10.1080/17438730802139004
   Cerin E, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P1682, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d
   Chang M, 2023, ADV ENG INFORM, V56, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102025
   Chang M, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0260349
   Chu KKA, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP63, DOI 10.3141/2063-08
   Clave SA, 2018, INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, V0, PP195, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-89941-1_10
   Colglazier W, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P1048, DOI 10.1126/science.aad2333
   Coupland K, 2022, DOCTORAL DISSERTATION, V0, P0
   Coupland K, 2022, J FOREST, V120, P256, DOI 10.1093/jofore/fvab053
   Csurgó B, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, P0, DOI 10.3390/su14127305
   Dadashpoor H, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.06.005
   den Braver NR, 2022, ENVIRON INT, V163, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107182
   Duncan DT, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V45, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.008
   Engle S, 2020, SSRN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3565703
   Fonseca F, 2019, NO TITLE CAPTURED, V0, P125
   Forsyth A, 2015, URBAN DES INT, V20, P274, DOI 10.1057/udi.2015.22
   Freeman L, 2013, J URBAN HEALTH, V90, P575, DOI 10.1007/s11524-012-9758-7
   Gaglione F, 2021, EUR TRANSP, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.48295/ET.2021.85.5
   Griffin T, 2009, J HOSP MARKET MANAG, V18, P127, DOI 10.1080/19368620802590167
   Hall CM, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P223, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2017.1404607
   Hanibuchi T, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.015
   Helsley RW, 2007, J ECON GEOGR, V7, P119, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbl027
   Hendricks MD, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V38, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.039
   Hino K, 2022, CITIES, V123, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103614
   Hirsch JA, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V45, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.018
   Hoffman LM, 2003, CITIES AND VISITORS, V0, PP91, DOI 10.1002/9780470773673.CH5
   Hu S, 2021, CITIES, V109, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103012
   Huang RZ, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V12, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.12.002
   Joppe M, 2003, ANN TOURISM RES, V30, P275, DOI 10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00065-8
   Kim EJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11246915
   Kim H, 2018, TRANSPORT POLICY, V66, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.008
   Kissfazekas K, 2022, CITIES, V123, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103587
   Koohsari MJ, 2018, CITIES, V74, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.016
   Kothencz G, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V64, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.012
   Lee BS, 2021, ASIAN POPUL STUD, V17, P71, DOI 10.1080/17441730.2020.1781380
   Lee M, 2020, INT J HOSP MANAG, V90, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102595
   Lee WK, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V92, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.003
   Leslie E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
   Li J, 2016, 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING (ICITE), V0, PP227, DOI 10.1109/ICITE.2016.7581337
   Liao BJ, 2022, CITIES, V125, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103650
   Lo RH, 2009, J URBANISM INT RES P, V2, P145, DOI 10.1080/17549170903092867
   Maitland R, 2006, TOURISM, V0, P25, DOI 10.1079/9781845931308.0025
   Marquel O, 2020, CITIES, V106, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102926
   Marzbani M, 2020, THE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SPACE, V0, PP21, DOI 10.32891/jps.v5i1.1249
   Mayne DJ, 2013, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-12-61
   Martínez LM, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V26, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.018
   Molinillo S, 2018, TOURISM MANAGE, V65, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.021
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Russo AP, 2016, ASPECT TOURISM TEXT, V73, P1
   Pappalepore I, 2010, TOURISM CULTURE & COMMUNICATION, V10, P217, DOI 10.3727/109830410X12910355180946
   Paulino I, 2021, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V19, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100508
   Pearce DG, 1998, TOURISM MANAGE, V19, P49, DOI 10.1016/S0261-5177(97)00095-2
   Peiravian F, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V39, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.020
   Ponce-Lopez R, 2021, CITIES, V113, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103158
   Rafiemanzelat R, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V24, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.074
   Ram Y, 2018, INT J TOUR CITIES, V4, P369, DOI 10.1108/IJTC-11-2017-0066
   Rodriguez-Valencia A, 2020, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2674, P250, DOI 10.1177/0361198120914611
   ROW AT, 1962, YALE LAW J, V71, P1597, DOI 10.2307/794509
   Russo A, 2022, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V13377, P338, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-10536-4_23
   Shao H, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.010
   Shokouhyar S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102714
   Steele JE, 2017, J R SOC INTERFACE, V14, P0, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2016.0690
   Stendardi D, 2020, REVISTA ESPACIOS, V41, P0
   Sugimoto K, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11030919
   Thornton LE, 2022, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-021-01243-3
   Ujang N, 2014, ATHENS JOURNAL OF TOURISM, VX, P53, DOI 10.30958/ajt.2-1-4
   Vale DS, 2016, J TRANSP LAND USE, V9, P209, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.593
   Vertesi J, 2019, DIGITALSTS, V0, P221, DOI 10.1515/9780691190600-017
   Wise N, 2015, J URBAN AFF, V37, P662, DOI 10.1111/juaf.12130
   Xiao WY, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000638
   Yadi YE, 2021, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, V2, P1082, DOI 10.46729/ijstm.v2i4.243
   Yamu C, 2022, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V13377, P387, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-10536-4_26
   Yeh JHY, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13041799
   Zhang YX, 2022, T GIS, V26, P1399, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12909
   Zhang YR, 2021, CITIES, V112, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103157
NR 81
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 4
U2 56
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC 15
PY 2023
VL 143
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104564
EA SEP 2023
PG 15
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA U4RF0
UT WOS:001084681000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Rajabi, M
   Mohammadi, MN
   Montazerolhodjah, M
AF Rajabi, Maryam
   Mohammadi, Mohammadreza Noghsan
   Montazerolhodjah, Mahdi
TI Pedestrian accessibility in spatial gridiron organisations: a measure by regarding visual graph analysis
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Patterning; Public space; Spatial pattern; Graph theory; Spatial gridiron organisations; Walkability
ID land-use; travel behavior; walking; connectivity; environment; network; streets
AB For a walkable square, it is essential to thoroughly assess the physical environment with patterning, specifying aspects, gridiron organisations' effect evaluations, and successful relationships. This research reveals the spatial pattern of Taft City square regarding graph theory and its indicators. Given a network representation, we aggregate spatial pattern aspects and indicators into a sophisticated description of a social space in which everything may be connected to everything else in the vicinity. Then, we encode it into the adjacency matrix and attribute and organise it according to analytic skills. Extracting physical patterns helps us rearrange public spaces and make the city a better host for its users' activities, maintaining and sustaining them from ongoing destruction. This article analyses historical square typologies and their elements to form patterns for planning processes required to support the desired change or growth over time. Research indicates that smaller squares are preferable for pedestrians and walkability. Using the specified pattern and square measurements, the maximum accessibility level for walkability in each local community is 20 m in length and 15 m in width. Therefore, the square area in Taft City is seen as a public space that can be used for new gridiron subdivisions.
C1 [Rajabi, Maryam] Yazd Univ, Fac Art & Architecture, Univ Blvd, Yazd 8915893996, Iran.
   [Mohammadi, Mohammadreza Noghsan; Montazerolhodjah, Mahdi] Yazd Univ, Sch Art & Architecture, Dept Urbanism, Univ Blvd, Yazd, Iran.
C3 University of Yazd; University of Yazd
RP Rajabi, M (通讯作者)，Yazd Univ, Fac Art & Architecture, Univ Blvd, Yazd 8915893996, Iran.
EM Maryam.rajabi@stu.yazd.ac.ir; mohammadi@yazd.ac.ir; montazer@yazd.ac.ir
CR Akengin H, 2013, MARMARA COGRAFYA DER, V28, P501
   Aksoy H, 2022, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V19, P10257, DOI 10.1007/s13762-021-03847-5
   Aksoy T, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P28995, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17766-y
   Alexander, 2008, ARCHITECTURE SECRET, V0, P0
   Anderson S, 1993, SETTLEMENTS AMERICAS, V0, P0
   Batty M, 2004, A NEW THEORY OF SPACE SYNTAX, V0, P0
   Castagnoli F, 1971, ORTHOGONAL TOWN PLANNING IN ANTIQUITY, V0, P0
   Cetin M, 2015, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V22, P420, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066
   Cetin Mehmet, 2020, TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE - FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V8, P2695, DOI 10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2695-2701.3891
   Cetin M, 2020, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V13, P991, DOI 10.1007/s11869-020-00858-y
   Cetin M, 2018, ARAB J GEOSCI, V11, P0, DOI 10.1007/s12517-018-4170-6
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Farkisch, 2017, IRAN U SCI TECHNOLOG, V4, P72
   Figueiredo L, 2005, SPACE SYNTAX 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, Vol 1, Proceedings
   Figueiredo L, 2007, DECODING THE URBAN GRID: OR WHY CITIES ARE NEITHER TREES NOR PERFECT GRIDS, V0, P0
   Forsyth A, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P1973, DOI 10.1177/0042098008093386
   Frank L, 1994, TRANSPN RES REC, V1466, P44
   GARBRECHT D, 1978, EKISTICS, V45, P408
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 1987, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: USING PUBLIC SPACE, V0, P0
   GELL A, 1985, MAN, V20, P271, DOI 10.2307/2802385
   Grant Jill, 2001, PLANNINGPERSPECTIVES, V16, P219, DOI 10.1080/02665430152469575
   Gross J, 2003, HDB GRAPH THEORY, V0, P0
   Guo Z, 2009, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V14, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2009.03.007
   GUY CM, 1987, TOWN PLAN REV, V58, P63, DOI 10.3828/tpr.58.1.j133811110793027
   Habitat UN, 2013, STREETS AS PUBLIC SPACES AND DRIVERS OF URBAN PROSPERITY, V0, P0
   Hall ET, 1966, HIDDEN DIMENSION, V609, P0, DOI 10.2307/1572461
   Handy SL, 1997, ENVIRON PLANN A, V29, P1175, DOI 10.1068/a291175
   Hiller B, 2002, URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, V7, P153, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000082
   Hillier B, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3693, P475
   Hillier B, 1999, URBAN DES INT, V4, P107, DOI 10.1057/UDI.1999.19
   Hillier B, 1984, THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF SPACE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511597237
   Hillier Bill, 1996, SPACE IS MACHINE CON, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(97)89854-7
   Hoehner CM, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023
   Jacobs AB, 1993, GREAT STREETS CAMBRIDGE, V0, P0
   Jacobs J, 1992, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jiang B, 1999, COMPUTERS, V0, P0
   Onac AK, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P50847, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-14299-2
   Krier, 2005, STADTRAUM URBAN SPAC, V0, P0
   Krier L, 1984, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, V54, P43
   Krier Rob, 1979, URBAN SPACE, V0, P0
   Krizek KJ, 2003, J PLAN EDUC RES, V22, P270, DOI 10.1177/0739456X02250315
   Li Y, 2005, JOURNAL OF EASTERN ASIA SOCIETY FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES, V6, P241, DOI 10.11175/EASTS.6.241
   Marshall S, 2005, URBAN PATTERN SPECIFICATION. SUSTAINABILITY OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORT IN OUTER NEIGHBORHOODS, V0, P0
   Miller HJ, 2000, GEOINFORMATICA, V4, P141, DOI 10.1023/A:1009820006075
   Mirmoghtadaee M, 2009, J CONSTR DEV CTRIES, V14, P69
   Moudon AV, 1986, BUILT CHANGE NEIGHBO, V0, P0
   Moughtin C, 2007, URBAN DESIGN: STREET AND SQUARE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780080520278
   Newman P, 1999, SUSTAINABILITY CITIE, V0, P0
   Okabe A, 2006, GEOGR ANAL, V38, P57, DOI 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00674.x
   Okabe A, 2012, SPATIAL ANAL NETWORK, V0, P0
   Ortakavak Z, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, P0, DOI 10.1007/s10661-020-08735-y
   Ozbil A, 2011, URBAN DES INT, V16, P125, DOI 10.1057/udi.2011.2
   Panerai P, 1997, FORMES URBAINES: DE LILOT A LA BARRE, V0, P0
   Peponis J, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P881, DOI 10.1068/b33088
   Porta S, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN, V0, P0
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Pushkarev Boris, 1975, URBAN SPACE PEDESTRI, V0, P0
   Rajabi M, 2022, J IRANIAN ARCHITECTU, V8, P181
   Rajabi M, 2022, INT REV SPAT PLAN SU, V10, P111, DOI 10.14246/irspsd.10.2_111
   Reps JW, 1965, MAKING URBAN AM HIST, V0, P0
   Rismanchian O, 2010, JOURNAL OF FINE ARTS: ARCHITECTURE URBAN PLANNING, V2, P49
   ROW AT, 1962, YALE LAW J, V71, P1597, DOI 10.2307/794509
   Rundle A, 2007, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P326, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.326
   SADALLA EK, 1989, ENVIRON BEHAV, V21, P346, DOI 10.1177/0013916589213006
   Scheflen AE, 1972, BODY LANGUAGE AND THE SOCIAL ORDER: COMMUNICATION AS BEHAVIORAL CONTROL, V0, P0
   Sevtsuk A, 2016, URBAN MORPHOL, V20, P89
   Shpuza E, 2007, URBAN SHAPES URBAN G, V0, P0
   Siksna Arnis, 1998, JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, V0, PP253, DOI 10.1080/13574809808724429
   Sommer Robert, 1969, PERSONAL SPACE: THE BEHAVIORAL BASIS OF DESIGN, V0, P0
   Speck J, 2015, DOCUMENTS DAN LISI G, V61, P437
   Takeuchi D, 1977, DOBOKU GAKKAI NO YOK, V259, P91
   Thoroughfares, 2010, CONTEXT SENSITIVE AP, V215, P0
   Turner A, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN B, V28, P103, DOI 10.1068/b2684
   Turner Alasdair, 1999, PROCEEDINGS OF OF SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPACE SYNTAX, V29th March - 2rd, P103
   Xie F, 2007, GEOGR ANAL, V39, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00707.x
   Yang D, 2004, COMFORT ZONE P 21 AS, V0, P339
   Zacharias J, 2001, J PLAN LIT, V16, P3, DOI 10.1177/08854120122093249
   Zegras PC, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP175, DOI 10.3141/1898-21
NR 79
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 17
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD MAR 15
PY 2023
VL 28
IS 1
BP 70
EP 92
DI 10.1057/s41289-022-00213-w
EA DEC 2022
PG 23
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA C3IU2
UT WOS:000903842000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU de Quadros, BM
   Mizgier, MGO
AF de Quadros, Bianca Milani
   Mizgier, Martin Gabriel Ordenes
TI Urban green infrastructures to improve pedestrian thermal comfort: A systematic review
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Review
DE Pedestrian thermal comfort; Urban heat island; Heat mitigation strategies; Urban green infrastructure; Urban planning; Climate adaptation
ID island mitigation strategy; open spaces; microclimate; design; impact; climate; environment; areas; trees
AB Evidence of heat mitigation through green infrastructure has been extensively documented and quantified in the literature; however, the effectiveness of implementing these strategies regarding thermal comfort at the pedestrian level has not received the same attention. Thus, this paper aims to investigate the role of UGI strategies on pedestrian the thermal comfort in different climatic contexts. Seventy-six peer-reviewed studies were included, analysed and synthesised for their (i) methodological approaches, (ii) pedestrian-level heat mitigation effects. It is seen that there is a positive association of UGI with pedestrian thermal comfort in temperate, continental, arid and tropical climates. Concerning to heat mitigation effects, street trees, green spaces and green walls have great cooling potential. However, green roofs have a negligible effect at the pedestrian level. The evolution of the role of the UGI for pedestrian thermal comfort in different climatic zones reveals the need to develop urban projects based on choosing the "right tree in the right place". Furthermore, the challenges of evaluating the heat mitigation performance of the UGI require procedures to compensate for psychological influences on thermal perception and standardized monitoring protocols to increase the reliability of the results and allow comparisons between different studies.
C1 [de Quadros, Bianca Milani; Mizgier, Martin Gabriel Ordenes] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Lab Environm Comft LABCON, Dept Architecture & Urbanism, R Eng Agron Andrei Cristian Ferreira 662, BR-88040535 Florianopolis, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
RP de Quadros, BM (通讯作者)，Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Lab Environm Comft LABCON, Dept Architecture & Urbanism, R Eng Agron Andrei Cristian Ferreira 662, BR-88040535 Florianopolis, Brazil.
EM bianca.milani@posgrad.ufsc.br
CR Aboelata A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V166, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106407
   Antoniadis D, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P2025, DOI 10.1007/s00484-018-1612-5
   Aruninta A, 2018, INT J GEOMATE, V14, P26, DOI 10.21660/2018.44.7207
   Atwa S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V59, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102198
   Balany F, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/w12123577
   Bandurski K, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/en13112755
   Berardi U, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V747, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141300
   Brown R, 2010, DESIGN MICROCLIMATE, V0, P0
   Chatzidimitriou A, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V26, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.004
   Chatzidimitriou A, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V108, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.08.048
   Chen L, 2013, ARCHIT SCI REV, V56, P297, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2012.684871
   Chen TH, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V801, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149527
   Cheung PK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102974
   Coccolo S, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V35, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.007
   Cohen P, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V51, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.020
   Colter KR, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V44, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126429
   Coutts AM, 2013, PROG PHYS GEOG, V37, P2, DOI 10.1177/0309133312461032
   Cui LH, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13052736
   de Abreu-Harbicha LV, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.008
   Detommaso M, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13063138
   Du HY, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18115941
   Elsadek M, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V42, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.05.007
   Engineers A-C, 2013, STANDARD 169 - CLIMATIC DATA FOR BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS, V0, P0
   Erell EvyatarDavid Pearlmutter Terence Williamson, 2012, URBAN MICROCLIMATE: DESIGNING THE SPACES BETWEEN BUILDINGS, V0, P0
   Fahmy M, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, P0, DOI 10.3390/cli7010001
   Gachkar D, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103309
   GIVONI B, 1994, RENEW ENERG, V5, P1047, DOI 10.1016/0960-1481(94)90132-5
   Guo ST, 2022, ARCHIT SCI REV, V65, P72, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2021.1916427
   Irmak MA, 2017, ATMOSFERA, V30, P355, DOI 10.20937/atm.2017.30.04.06
   Jamei E, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V134, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110362
   Jamei E, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V144, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.023
   Jamei E, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V54, P1002, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.104
   Jimenez MS, 2018, ARCHIT SCI REV, V61, P48, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2017.1405789
   Karimi A, 2020, ENERGY REP, V6, P1670, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.015
   Koc CB, 2018, SOL ENERGY, V166, P486, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.008
   Kottek M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P259, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Li JW, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V170, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106614
   Li J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V271, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122555
   Lin YH, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/su9030340
   Liu ZX, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V200, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107939
   Ma X, 2019, ENERGIES, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/en12071324
   Manickathan L, 2018, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V248, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.014
   Mballo S, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V37, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100844
   Mohammad P, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V40, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100993
   Moher D, 2009, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V62, P1006, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
   Morakinyo TE, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V719, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137461
   Morakinyo TE, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.010
   Motazedian A, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V52, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126688
   Mughal MO, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100939
   Nasrollahi N, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su122310000
   Ng E, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V47, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.014
   Oke TR, 2009, BOUNDARY LAYER CLIMATES, V2nd, P0
   Oliveira S, 2014, FINISTERRA, V49, P113
   Park CY, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V141, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.058
   Peng LLH, 2013, ENERGIES, V6, P598, DOI 10.3390/en6020598
   Petralli M, 2020, MISC GEOGR, V24, P111, DOI 10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0017
   Petralli M, 2015, ITAL J AGROMETEOROL, V20, P39
   Rahman MA, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V63, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127223
   Rahman MA, 2020, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V287, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107947
   Ren ZB, 2022, J FORESTRY RES, V33, P911, DOI 10.1007/s11676-021-01361-5
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, V0, P0
   Saito K, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.003
   Salata F, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V30, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.006
   Salman AM, 2021, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V10, P838, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.002
   Santamouris M, 2020, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/buildings10120233
   Snir K, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V152, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.008
   Sodoudi S, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.002
   Speak AF, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V208, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108600
   Taleghani M, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P2011, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.010
   Taleghani M, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, P0, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/024003
   Tsoka S, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V43, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.009
   Wang YF, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V287, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124995
   Wang YF, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P87, DOI 10.1007/s00484-016-1193-0
   Wang ZH, 2016, APPL ENERG, V161, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.047
   Yang W, 2016, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V142, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000285
   Yilmaz S, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P3672, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-10555-z
   Yin S, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V49, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101571
   Yin S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11051355
   Zhao QS, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V32, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.022
   Zölch T, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V149, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.051
   Zou M, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P62640, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-15172-y
NR 81
TC 61
Z9 65
U1 18
U2 167
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 88
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128091
EA SEP 2023
PG 14
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban Studies
GA U3AN7
UT WOS:001083561800001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Chiang, YC
   Liu, HH
   Li, DY
   Ho, LC
AF Chiang, Yen-Cheng
   Liu, Ho-Hsun
   Li, Dongying
   Ho, Li-Chih
TI Quantification through deep learning of sky view factor and greenery on urban streets during hot and cool seasons
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Google street view; Streetscape; Urban greenery; Urban heat island
ID thermal comfort; heat-island; shade provision; region; trees; temperature; environment; sensation; index; summer
AB The urban heat island effect has gained attention worldwide. Built environment characteristics such as sky view factor (SVF) and green view index (GVI) can affect urban thermal environments and pedestrians' thermal comfort. With recent technological advances, Google Street View (GSV) can be used to rapidly obtain panoramic street-view images with high reliability, enabling convenient and low-cost environmental assessment of urban settings. In addition, deep learning technology for quantifying the characteristics of urban environments has advanced considerably. This study sought to (1) determine the consistency between deep learning and manual classification of urban environment characteristics and (2) investigate the effects of street-level SVF and GVI on thermal comfort, especially the differences in their effects during hot and cool seasons. The study was conducted in the West District of Taichung City, and GSV was used to capture images from which SVF and GVI were calculated. A total of 50 sample locations were selected for an onsite questionnaire and thermal comfort was measured to determine the effects of SVF and GVI. The results indicated deep learning and manual classifications of SVF and GVI to be highly correlated. With regard to effects, SVF had a significant positive effect on physio-logical equivalent temperature and thermal sensation votes. GVI also had a significant positive effect on phys-iological equivalent temperature, but no effect on thermal sensation votes. Thus, reducing SVF and implementing greening projects may improve thermal comfort of pedestrians on the streets. These results offer implications for future urban planning and large-scale urban thermal environment assessments.
C1 [Chiang, Yen-Cheng; Liu, Ho-Hsun] Natl Chiayi Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, Chiayi, Taiwan.
   [Li, Dongying] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, College Stn, TX USA.
   [Ho, Li-Chih] Tunghai Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, Taichung, Taiwan.
C3 National Chiayi University; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Tunghai University
RP Ho, LC (通讯作者)，Tunghai Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, Taichung, Taiwan.
EM lichih.ho@gmail.com
FU National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan [MOST 107-2813-C-415-009-H, MOST 107-2410-H-415-025]; Houston Methodist Hospital through the Center for Health AMP; Nature Pilot Grant; Gulf Research Program of the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
CR Unknown -, 2004, THERMAL ENV CONDITIO, V0, P0
   Argüeso D, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117066
   Bernard J, 2018, CLIMATE, V6, P0, DOI 10.3390/cli6030060
   Brown RD, 1995, MICROCLIMATIC LANDSCAPE DESIGN: CREATING THERMAL COMFORT AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY, V1, P0
   Budget Accounting and Statistics Office., 2021, 2021 STAT YB, V0, P0
   de Morais MVB, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10072183
   Campbell A, 2019, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V77, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101350
   Chatzipoulka C, 2018, SOL ENERGY, V170, P1026, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.028
   Chen L-C, 2017, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Chun B, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V71, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.05.006
   Daramola MT, 2019, REMOTE SENS APPL, V15, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100253
   Dirksen M, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V30, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100498
   Dzyuban Y, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V834, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155294
   Falfán I, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V36, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.016
   Gong FY, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V134, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.042
   Gupta K, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.003
   Hadianpour M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P751, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.003
   He BJ, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V161, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112350
   He BJ, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.01.004
   Hwang RL, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P863, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.017
   ISO, 1998, ISO 7726:1998, V0, P0
   Jamei E, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V144, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.023
   Ki D, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
   Kim SW, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V808, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152143
   Klemm W, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V83, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.013
   Kong L, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V31, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.018
   Larkin A, 2019, J EXPO SCI ENV EPID, V29, P447, DOI 10.1038/s41370-018-0017-1
   Lee DS, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V197, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107840
   Li DY, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V173, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.009
   Li GG, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V169, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106587
   Li T, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127153
   Li XJ, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V31, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.013
   Li XJ, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V169, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.011
   Li XJ, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006
   Li XY, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V209, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108646
   Li YC, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/buildings12081167
   Lin TP, 2008, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V52, P281, DOI 10.1007/s00484-007-0122-7
   Lin TP, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.011
   Lin TP, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.002
   Lin TP, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P2017, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.02.004
   Liu XL, 2019, ARTIF INTELL REV, V52, P1089, DOI 10.1007/s10462-018-9641-3
   Long Y, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0171110
   Lopez CSP, 2016, ENRGY PROCED, V91, P989, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.266
   Lumnitz S, 2021, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V175, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.016
   Matzarakis A, 1999, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V43, P76, DOI 10.1007/s004840050119
   Matzarakis A, 2010, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V54, P131, DOI 10.1007/s00484-009-0261-0
   Miao CP, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V168, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106497
   Ni J, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P3040, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3062447
   OKE TR, 1981, J CLIMATOL, V1, P237, DOI 10.1002/joc.3370010304
   Pantavou K, 2013, ADV BUILD ENERGY RES, V7, P170, DOI 10.1080/17512549.2013.865557
   Peng F, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V123, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.038
   Schweiker M, 2017, BUILD RES INF, V45, P572, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1183185
   Suppakittpaisarn P, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V40, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.007
   Svensson MK, 2004, METEOROL APPL, V11, P201, DOI 10.1017/S1350482704001288
   Venhari AA, 2019, J ARID ENVIRON, V166, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.04.009
   Wang Z, 2020, J BUILD ENG, V29, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101120
   Wu QQ, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V171, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106640
   Wu ZF, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13121217
   Xia YX, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V59, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126995
   Yang J, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V91, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.004
   Yang YJ, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.033
   Yu HY, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V286, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117582
   Yuan C, 2011, ARCHIT SCI REV, V54, P305, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2011.613644
   Zeng LY, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V135, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.009
   Zhang F, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.020
   Zhang H, 2004, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Zhang J, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V44, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126422
   Zhang L, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V130, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.014
   Zhou BL, 2019, INT J COMPUT VISION, V127, P302, DOI 10.1007/s11263-018-1140-0
NR 69
TC 88
Z9 92
U1 56
U2 395
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD APR 15
PY 2023
VL 232
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104679
EA JAN 2023
PG 11
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 8L0NH
UT WOS:000923486900001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Verma, R
   Ukkusuri, SV
AF Verma, Rajat
   Ukkusuri, Satish V.
TI A link criticality approach for pedestrian network design to promote walking
SO NPJ URBAN SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
ID physical-activity; neighborhood walkability; infrastructure
AB Measures of walkability generally do not provide a detailed quantitative assessment of pedestrian infrastructure development prioritization. In this study, a link-based composite measure of walkability and walking is introduced to overcome this limitation. This measure, called 'pednet score', is based on a weighted pedestrian network ('pednet') made of sidewalks and crosswalks whose edge weights are descriptive of their popularity. Edge popularity is derived from home-based walk trip assignments derived from simulated pedestrian demand. Properties of the pednet score are studied using three hypothetical variants of the pednet in three North American cities, each involving the addition of candidate sidewalk and/or crosswalk segments. It is shown that a strategic selection of these segments based on pednet score can substantially increase walking trips, in some cases up to 236%, and reduce current mean pedestrian trip distances by up to 340 m. A mixed development approach involving both sidewalks and crosswalks also shows considerably higher improvement than those segments considered alone. Results from marginal benefit curves strongly indicate the utility of the pednet score as a measure of link criticality for segment prioritization in pedestrian network design.
C1 [Verma, Rajat; Ukkusuri, Satish V.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, 550 Stadium Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
C3 Purdue University System; Purdue University
RP Verma, R; Ukkusuri, SV (通讯作者)，Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, 550 Stadium Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
EM verma99@purdue.edu; sukkusur@purdue.edu
CR Aghaabbasi M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.001
   Agrawal AW, 2007, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V12, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.005
   Unknown -, 2022, UNITED NATIONS THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS REPORT 2022, V0, P0
   Batista Rodrigo de Abreu, 2015, POLIBITS, V0, P85, DOI 10.17562/pb-52-9
   Bélanger P, 2007, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V22, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2006.07.005
   Böhm M, 2022, NAT SUSTAIN, V5, P699, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-00903-x
   Bolten N, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0248399
   Brandes U, 2008, SOC NETWORKS, V30, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.11.001
   Briem L, 2017, P 16 INT S EXP ALG, V0, P0
   Croese S, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, P0, DOI 10.1038/s42949-020-00006-6
   Dovey K, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P93, DOI 10.1177/0042098018819727
   Ellis G, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P130, DOI 10.1177/0265813515610672
   Ewing R, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP175, DOI 10.3141/1831-20
   Fan C, 2022, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V2, P0, DOI 10.1038/s42949-022-00051-3
   Fonseca F, 2022, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V16, P660, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2021.1914793
   Forsyth A, 2015, URBAN DES INT, V20, P274, DOI 10.1057/udi.2015.22
   Forsyth Ann, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V36, P429, DOI 10.2148/BENV.36.4.429
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   Hoehner CM, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023
   Hosseini S, 2021, COMPUT IND ENG, V159, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107522
   Hou Q, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V119, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102772
   Humberto Mateus, 2019, AMBIENT. CONSTR., V19, P23, DOI 10.1590/s1678-86212019000400341
   Hussein N, 2018, J CONT URBAN AFFAIRS, V2, P102, DOI 10.25034/ijcua.2018.3666
   Keall MD, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V65, P687, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.10.004
   Lam WHK, 1996, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM, V0, PP99, DOI 10.1109/IVS.1996.566360
   Lee S, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P368, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
   Litman TA, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP3, DOI 10.3141/1828-01
   Lo RH, 2009, J URBANISM INT RES P, V2, P145, DOI 10.1080/17549170903092867
   Maghelal Praveen K, 2011, URISA JOURNAL, V23, P5
   Mizdrak A, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0219316
   Owen A, 2014, ACCESS ACROSS AMERICA: WALKING 2014, V0, P0
   Owen N, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V33, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025
   Porta S, 2005, URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, V10, P51, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000136
   Proulx FR, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP99, DOI 10.3141/2527-11
   Rabl A, 2012, TRANSPORT POLICY, V19, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.09.008
   Root ED, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V168, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.028
   Schlossberg M, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP48, DOI 10.3141/1982-08
   Speck Jeff, 2012, WALKABLE CITY DOWNTO, V0, P0
   Talen Emily, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE LAND USE URBAN PLANNING, V1, P42, DOI 10.24102/ijslup.v1i1.211
   Telega A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13041883
   Thomas J, 2017, NATIONAL WALKABILITY INDEX USER GUIDE AND METHODOLOGY, V0, P0
   Ukkusuri SV, 2009, J TRANSP SECUR, V2, P29, DOI 10.1007/s12198-009-0025-4
   Yang Y, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V43, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015
   Zhang H, 2019, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2673, P294, DOI 10.1177/0361198119846095
   Zhao JT, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2418, DOI 10.1177/2399808320977871
NR 45
TC 4
Z9 6
U1 1
U2 6
PU SPRINGERNATURE
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 
EI 2661-8001
J9 NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN
JI npj Urban Sustain.
PD AUG 19
PY 2023
VL 3
IS 1
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1038/s42949-023-00114-z
PG 10
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA P4FU4
UT WOS:001050228000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU te Boveldt, G
   De Wilde, L
   Keseru, I
   Macharis, C
AF te Boveldt, Geert
   De Wilde, Liesbeth
   Keseru, Imre
   Macharis, Cathy
TI Pedestrianisation as a step in a societal transformation? An analysis of support and opposition in Brussels
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE pedestrianisation; open streets; car dominance; low-traffic neighbourhoods; public space; mobility regime; Brussels
ID pedestrianization; behavior; quality
AB Brussels (Belgium) is one of several major cities with a recent emblematic pedestrianisation project aiming to give public space 'back to people'. Wondering whether these initiatives represent 'cracks in the system' of car dominance, we studied how support for the pedestrianisation has evolved across society, taking into account people's socio-economic and mobility attributes as well as geographical scale. We conducted surveys before and after implementation among metropolitan area residents, people employed in the area and passers-by through online and face-to-face surveys. Findings show a strong increase in overall support, both for the pedestrianisation the central boulevards (now with a majority now in favour) as for a further roll-out. Residential location nearby the pedestrianised centre is identified as a factor of support, but most importantly, habitual car use and remain strong predictive factors of opposition, confirming the various descriptions in literature of automobility as a tenacious socio-technical system.
C1 [te Boveldt, Geert; De Wilde, Liesbeth; Keseru, Imre; Macharis, Cathy] Vrije Univ Brussel, MOBILISE Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium.
   [te Boveldt, Geert] VUB, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Vrije Universiteit Brussel
RP te Boveldt, G (通讯作者)，VUB, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
EM geert.te.boveldt@vub.be
FU Governement of the Brussels Capital Region [BMB/DS-DB/2016.1004]
CR Amistad FT, 2010, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V136, P11, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:1(11)
   APPLEYARD D, 1972, J AM I PLANNERS, V38, P84, DOI 10.1080/01944367208977410
   ASHBY D, 1989, STAT MED, V8, P1317, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780081104
   Baehler D, 2022, APPL MOBIL, V7, P280, DOI 10.1080/23800127.2020.1860513
   Batel S, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V58, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018
   Batty P, 2015, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V2, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2014.12.001
   Bertolini L, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P734, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907
   Boussauw K, 2016, PORTFOLIO #1: CADRAGES | OUVERTURES | FOCUS, V0, P0
   Brandeleer Celine, 2016, KATERNEN VAN HET KENNISCENTRUM VAN DE MOBILITEIT IN HET BRUSSELS HOOFDSTEDELIJK GEWEST, V0, P5
   Braun R, 2022, TOWARDS POST-AUTOMOBILITY: DESTITUTING AUTOMOBILITY, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1080/23800127.2022.2071664
   Brussel Mobiliteit, 2021, GEWESTELIJK MOBILITEITSPLAN 2020-2030, V0, P0
   Burden D, 2011, ITE J, V81, P36
   Carmona M, 2018, PROG PLANN, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2017.09.001
   Castillo-Manzano JI, 2014, HABITAT INT, V44, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.005
   Chiquetto S, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P133, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(96)00016-8
   DEAR M, 1992, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V58, P288, DOI 10.1080/01944369208975808
   Decroly J-M, 2016, BSI-BCO PORTFOLIO, V1, P29
   Gant R, 1997, DISABIL SOC, V12, P723, DOI 10.1080/09687599727010
   Geels FrankW, 2012, AUTOMOBILITY IN TRANSITION?: A SOCIO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Genard J-L, 2016, PORTFOLIO #1: CADRAGES | OUVERTURES | FOCUS, V0, P0
   Hagen OH, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V97, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102944
   Hass-Klau C, 2014, THE PEDESTRIAN AND THE CITY, V0, PP1, DOI 10.4324/9780203067390/PEDESTRIAN-CITY-CARMEN-HASS-KLAU
   Hass-Klau Carmen, 1993, TRANSPORT POLICY, V1, P21, DOI 10.1016/0967-070X(93)90004-7
   Hubert M, 2013, BRUSSELS STUDIES, V71, P0
   Hubert M, 2016, BRUSS STUD, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.4000/brussels.621
   Karvonen A, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P379, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   Keseru I, 2016, BSI-BCO PORTFOLIO, V1, P97
   Khoo HL, 2015, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V9, P227, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2012.757401
   Litman T, 2018, EVALUATING TRANSPORTATION EQUITY: GUIDANCE FOR INCORPORATING DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, V0, P0
   Marcheschi E, 2022, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V14, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100585
   Melia S, 2016, PEDESTRIANISATION AND POLITICS: EVIDENCE GAPS AND A CASE STUDY OF BRIGHTONS OLD TOWN, V0, P0
   Melia S, 2018, P I CIVIL ENG-TRANSP, V171, P30, DOI 10.1680/jtran.16.00104
   Melia S, 2014, TRANSP SUSTAIN, V5, P213, DOI 10.1108/S2044-994120140000005012
   Nieuwenhuijsen M, 2019, INTEGRATING HUMAN HEALTH INTO URBAN AND TRANSPORT PLANNING: A FRAMEWORK, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9
   Nilsson M, 2000, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V5, P211, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00034-6
   Oltra C, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13031168
   Özdemir D, 2017, CITIES, V65, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.008
   Panagopoulos T, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, P0, DOI 10.3390/land7030100
   Parajuli A, 2018, J URBAN DES, V23, P142, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2017.1369875
   Parkhurst G, 2003, ECON. AFF, V23, P16, DOI 10.1111/1468-0270.00410
   Schwanen T, 2016, RETHINKING RESILIENCE AS CAPACITY TO ENDURE, V20, P152, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125718
   Semple T, 2023, INT J TRANSP SCI TEC, V12, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.12.001
   Szarata A, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V27, P752, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.018
   te Boveldt G, 2022, FINAL REPORT, V0, P0
   Tessuto J, 2016, ENVIRONNEMENT URBAIN, V10, P0
   Urry J, 2016, THE "SYSTEM" OF AUTOMOBILITY, V21, P25, DOI 10.1177/0263276404046059
   Urry J, 2017, THE LITTLE BOOK OF CARFREE CITIES, V0, P0
   Van Acker V, 2010, TRANSPORT REV, V30, P219, DOI 10.1080/01441640902943453
   Vanhellemont L, 2016, BSI-BCO PORTFOLIO, V1, P43
   Whitehead T, 2006, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V80, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.029
   Wolsink M, 2018, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V46, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.034
   Xenias D, 2013, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V48, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.007
NR 54
TC 7
Z9 9
U1 0
U2 8
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC 15
PY 2023
VL 143
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104577
EA OCT 2023
PG 12
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA GA8N5
UT WOS:001150029700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Salazar-Miranda, A
   Zhang, F
   Sun, MR
   Leoni, P
   Duarte, F
   Ratti, C
AF Salazar-Miranda, Arianna
   Zhang, Fan
   Sun, Maoran
   Leoni, Pietro
   Duarte, Fabio
   Ratti, Carlo
TI Smart curbs: Measuring street activities in real-time using computer vision
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Street activity; Pedestrians; Transportation modes; Image analysis; Computer vision
ID image
AB Streets are conduits of human activity. Despite their importance, studying street activity has been obscured by a lack of data on how people use them, with most approaches limited to studying a single point in time or small geographic areas. This paper proposes a new framework to measure street activity in real-time. Our framework leverages machine learning and computer vision to classify pedestrian activities and transportation modes using images collected from moving vehicles. We apply our methodology to measure street activity in Paris for five weeks. We produce activity maps for this period showing that streets vary dramatically in their capacity to support pedestrian activity and that these differences are highly persistent. Our proposed framework can be used to measure street activities in other contexts and cities, providing urban researchers with an approach to guide planning interventions, identify infrastructural deficiencies, and inform design policies that foster active streets.
C1 [Salazar-Miranda, Arianna; Sun, Maoran; Leoni, Pietro; Duarte, Fabio; Ratti, Carlo] MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Senseable City Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
   [Zhang, Fan] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Duarte, Fabio] MIT, Ctr Real Estate, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
C3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Hong Kong University of Science & Technology; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
RP Zhang, F (通讯作者)，Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM cefzhang@ust.hk
FU LandWey; Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria; Volkswagen Group America; FAE Technology; Samoo Architects Engineers; Shell; GoAigua; ENEL Foundation
CR Appleyard D, 1964, VIEW ROAD, V0, P0
   Ben-Joseph E, 2011, ROUTL COMPANIONS, V0, P261
   Bin Tan S, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V8, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.01.002
   Bochkovskiy A, 2020, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Bongiorno C, 2021, NAT COMPUT SCI, V1, P678, DOI 10.1038/s43588-021-00130-y
   Christaller W, 1966, CENTRAL PLACES IN SOUTHERN GERMANY, V0, P0
   Cordts M, 2016, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP3213, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.350
   Duarte F, 2021, WHAT URBAN CAMERAS R, V0, P0
   Dutta A, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA (MM19), V0, PP2276, DOI 10.1145/3343031.3350535
   Gehl J, 2013, STUDY PUBLIC LIFE, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 2011, LIFE BUILDINGS USING, V0, P0
   Goel R, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0196521
   González MC, 2008, NATURE, V453, P779, DOI 10.1038/nature06958
   Heine C, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0247996
   HILLIER B, 1993, ENVIRON PLANN B, V20, P29, DOI 10.1068/b200029
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jiang S, 2016, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIG DATA, V0, P0
   Jiang S, 2012, DATA MIN KNOWL DISC, V25, P478, DOI 10.1007/s10618-012-0264-z
   Lin TY, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8693, P740, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48
   Louail T, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, P0, DOI 10.1038/srep05276
   Lynch Banerjee, 1990, TRIDIB SOUTHWORTH MI, V0, P0
   Lynch Kevin, 1964, THE IMAGE OF THE CITY, V0, P0
   Milgram S, 1977, PSYCHOL MAPS PARIS, V0, P0
   Miranda AS, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V86, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101563
   NASAR JL, 1990, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V56, P41, DOI 10.1080/01944369008975742
   Of City Transportation Officials NA, 2013, URB STREET DES GUID, V0, P0
   Ratti C, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P727, DOI 10.1068/b32047
   Schläpfer M, 2021, NATURE, V593, P522, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03480-9
   Shoval N, 2008, CITIES, V25, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2007.07.005
   Wang MS, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V97, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101858
   Whyte WH, 1980, THE SOCIAL LIFE OF SMALL URBAN SPACES, V0, P0
   Williams S, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1534, DOI 10.1177/2399808319852636
   Yang YY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101747
   Yin L, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V63, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.010
   Zhou HX, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V66, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127386
NR 35
TC 27
Z9 32
U1 5
U2 69
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 234
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104715
EA FEB 2023
PG 9
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 9X2VJ
UT WOS:000949631000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Ren, XX
   Li, Q
   Yuan, MM
   Shao, SG
AF Ren, Xinxin
   Li, Qi
   Yuan, Minmin
   Shao, Shegang
TI How visible street greenery moderates traffic noise to improve acoustic comfort in pedestrian environments
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Audio-visual; streetscape; dominant sound; Perception; Road traffic; Environmental function
ID built environment; virtual-reality; urban; perception; trees; view; soundscapes; vegetation; annoyance; recovery
AB The effects of street greenery on the perceptual response to the acoustic comfort of pedestrian streets in traffic noise environments were examined through an experimental study that considered an audio-visual environment with no/low, medium, and high street greenery, dominated by road traffic, anthropogenic, and natural sounds. The results showed that the differences in the acoustic comfort evaluations without and with medium or high greenery were statistically significant. Under the effects of greenery, the acoustic comfort evaluation of each sound type dominating the environments without greenery increased by as much as one level, based on a fivepoint ordinal category scale. Considering various greenery conditions, dominant sound sources, and environmental functions, greenery was the most significant factor affecting acoustic comfort, and evaluations of pedestrian environments without greenery increased more in leisure environments (0.65-1.42) than in transportation environments (0.45-1.29) when road traffic sounds were at lower levels (50, 55, and 60 dBA) and anthropogenic and natural sounds were predominantly heard and influenced by street greenery. However, sound levels were the most significant factor affecting acoustic comfort when road traffic at 50-70 dBA was predominantly heard. Based on the negative linear relationships between sound levels and acoustic comfort evaluations for no/low, medium, and high greenery conditions, the evaluations affected by greenery increased with the increase in road traffic sound levels in transportation environments, whereas those influenced by either high or medium greenery in leisure environments tended to decrease gradually. These audio-visual perception-based findings provide reference guidance for PE quality optimization and related urban design considering comfortable sound environments.
C1 [Ren, Xinxin; Li, Qi] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Fine Art, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.
   [Ren, Xinxin; Yuan, Minmin; Shao, Shegang] Natl Environm Protect Engn & Technol Ctr Rd Traff, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China.
   [Yuan, Minmin; Shao, Shegang] Minist Transport, Res Inst Highway, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China.
C3 Dalian University of Technology; Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China
RP Ren, XX (通讯作者)，Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Fine Art, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.; Ren, XX (通讯作者)，Natl Environm Protect Engn & Technol Ctr Rd Traff, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China.
EM Renxinxin@dlut.edu.cn
FU National Environmental Protection Engineering and Technology Center for Road Traffic Noise Control [F20221019]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908102]; Philosophy and Social Science Planning Fund of Liaoning Province [L21BGL012]; Economic and Social Development Foundation of Liaoning province [2023lslybkt-029]; Teaching Reform Project of Dalian University of Technology [ZX2022002]
CR Alvarsson JJ, 2010, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V7, P1036, DOI 10.3390/ijerph7031036
   APPLEYARD D, 1972, J AM I PLANNERS, V38, P84, DOI 10.1080/01944367208977410
   Bain L, 2012, LIVING STREETS STRAT, V0, P2012
   Bishara AJ, 2021, PSYCHON B REV, V28, P1164, DOI 10.3758/s13423-021-01879-z
   Bishop ID, 2007, RENEW ENERG, V32, P814, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2006.03.009
   Brambilla G, 2006, ACTA ACUST UNITED AC, V92, P881
   Camacho-Cervantes M, 2014, URBAN ECOSYST, V17, P761, DOI 10.1007/s11252-014-0343-6
   De Coensel B, 2011, J ACOUST SOC AM, V129, PEL148, DOI 10.1121/1.3567073
   Di GQ, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V432, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.034
   Sanchez GME, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V167, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.018
   Ewing R, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P5, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15591585
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Fernandes CO, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.014
   Fields A, 2013, DISCOVERING STATISTICS USING IBM SPSS STATISTICS, V4th, P0, DOI 10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50012-4
   Galbrun L, 2013, J ACOUST SOC AM, V133, P227, DOI 10.1121/1.4770242
   Gifi Albert, 1990, NONLINEAR MULTIVARIA, V0, P0
   Hall DA, 2013, APPL ACOUST, V74, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.03.006
   Hidalgo AK, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V63, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127226
   Hong JY, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V186, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107327
   Hong JY, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V149, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.004
   Hong JY, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.001
   Hong JY, 2013, J ACOUST SOC AM, V134, P2026, DOI 10.1121/1.4817924
   Iglesias-Merchan C, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V286, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117291
   International Organization for Standardization, 2014, ISO 12913 12014 ACOU, V0, P0
   ISO, 2018, 12913-2 ACOUSTICS-SOUNDSCAPE-PART 2: DARA COLLECTION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, V0, P0
   Jacobs AllanB, 1993, GREAT STREETS, V1, P0
   Jeon JY, 2013, J ACOUST SOC AM, V134, P803, DOI 10.1121/1.4807801
   Jiang B, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V132, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.005
   Jiang LK, 2017, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V57, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.027
   Krzywicka P, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01705
   Lee PJ, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V482, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.026
   Leung TM, 2017, J ACOUST SOC AM, V141, P2399, DOI 10.1121/1.4979336
   Li H, 2020, APPL ACOUST, V166, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107372
   Li XJ, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006
   Lindal PJ, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.001
   Liu FF, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V129, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.040
   Lu Y, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V208, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.022
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, 2012, COD DES URB ROAD ENG, V0, P0
   Nilsson ME, 2006, ACTA ACUST UNITED AC, V92, P903
   Palmer JF, 2001, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V54, P149, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00133-5
   [潘杨 Pan Yang], 2013, 声学学报 ACTA ACUSTICA, V38, P215
   Park K, 2019, CITIES, V88, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.005
   Pikora TJ, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P708, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000210189.64458.f3
   Preis A, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V523, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.128
   Ren X, 2018, J ACOUST SOC AM, V96, P171
   Ren XX, 2023, FRONT PSYCHOL, V14, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122639
   Ren XX, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V232, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104674
   [任欣欣 Ren Xinxin], 2022, 建筑科学 BUILDING SCIENCE, V38, P70
   Ren XX, 2022, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V65, P1753, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2021.1947203
   Ren XX, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V252, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109622
   Ren XX, 2018, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V70, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.03.003
   Ren XX, 2015, APPL ACOUST, V96, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.03.007
   Gozalo GR, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V624, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.148
   Rindel JH, 1998, BUILD. ACOUST, V5, P291, DOI 10.1177/1351010X9800500405
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   Schaudinischky L, 1976, SOUND MAN BUILDING, V0, P0
   Schroeder HW, 1983, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V9, P237
   Soltani A, 2014, INT J URBAN SCI, V18, P19, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2013.874546
   SOUTHWORTH M, 1969, ENVIRON BEHAV, V1, P49
   Stanners D, 1995, EUROPES ENV DOBRIS A, V0, P359
   State Standard of the Peoples Requblic of China, 2008, 30962008 GB, V0, P0
   Sun Y, 2021, THESIS DALIAN U TECH, V0, P99
   Todorova A, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.11.001
   ULRICH RS, 1984, SCIENCE, V224, P420, DOI 10.1126/science.6143402
   Van Renterghem T, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V40, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.007
   Van Renterghem T, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V148, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.018
   Viollon S, 2003, P EURONOISE NAPLES, V0, P0
   VOSS RF, 1975, NATURE, V258, P317, DOI 10.1038/258317a0
   Watts G, 1999, APPL ACOUST, V56, P39, DOI 10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00019-X
   Watts GR, 2013, APPL ACOUST, V74, P1094, DOI 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.03.007
   WEINSTEIN ND, 1978, J APPL PSYCHOL, V63, P458, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.458
   Wergles N, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V91, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.010
   Whyte WilliamH, 1988, CITY REDISCOVERING THE CENTER, VFirst, P0
   Wolf KL, 2005, J FOREST, V103, P396
   Xiong X, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V176, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105903
   Xu CY, 2021, ACOUSTICS-BASEL, V3, P11, DOI 10.3390/acoustics3010003
   Yang J, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V91, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.004
   Yang YY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101747
   Zhao JW, 2018, APPL ACOUST, V141, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.07.001
NR 79
TC 35
Z9 36
U1 26
U2 172
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 238
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104839
EA JUL 2023
PG 16
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA N8UK1
UT WOS:001039696500001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Erturan, A
   Aksel, B
AF Erturan, Arzu
   Aksel, Bahar
TI Multidimensional analyses of walkability in city centres by using mobile methodologies: Besiktas and Delft experiences
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Walking; Walkability; Mobile methodologies; Go-along; Pedestrian perception; Comparable urban studies
ID neighborhood walkability; built environment; walking behavior; urban; perceptions; city; pedestrians; place; world
AB This study is seeking an answer to the main research question of how the walkability of urban space can be analysed with a multidimensional approach considering spatial, phenomenological and perception dimensions. "Mobile Methodologies" has been the base of this research and within this scope, "Go-Along" walks with participants were conducted in the city centres of Besiktas of Istanbul, Turkey, and Delft of Netherlands as part of case studies. Based on the urban comparable studies approach, spatial and temporal comparisons of the city centres of Besiktas and Delft were made by using "replication logic". Within the framework of this research, walkability studies in the literature were studied and six indicators as security, traffic safety, accessibility, comfort, pleasure and mixed-use were identified. These main indicators were used in the evaluation phase of case studies. According to the findings, it was concluded that walkability should be studied with a multidimensional approach and a relational perspective. In addition to this major conclusion, the necessity to use mobile methods for walkability analyses was described as the second significant result of the study.
C1 [Erturan, Arzu; Aksel, Bahar] Mimar Sinan Fine Arts Univ, Fac Architecture, City & Reg Planning, Istanbul, Turkey.
C3 Mimar Sinan Guzel Sanatlar University
RP Erturan, A (通讯作者)，Mimar Sinan Fine Arts Univ, Fac Architecture, City & Reg Planning, Istanbul, Turkey.
EM arzu.erturan@msgsu.edu.tr
FU Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University [2019-43]
CR Aksümer G, 2019, MEGARON, V14, P598, DOI 10.14744/MEGARON.2019.48751
   Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Anderson J, 2004, AREA, V36, P254, DOI 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.x
   Arshad AK, 2016, MATEC WEB CONF, V47, P0, DOI 10.1051/matecconf/20164703003
   Asadi-Shekari Z, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V49, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101563
   Battista GA, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP12, DOI 10.3141/2661-02
   Blecic I, 2015, CUPUM 2015 14 INT C, V0, P0
   Brown BB, 2007, ENVIRON BEHAV, V39, P34, DOI 10.1177/0013916506295569
   Buscher M, 2011, MOBILE METHODS, V0, P0
   Carpiano RM, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003
   Clark AM, 2010, EUR J CARDIOV PREV R, V17, P261, DOI 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32833090ef
   Cubukcu E, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V168, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.228
   Cubukcu E, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V85, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.335
   de Haas M, 2020, TRANSPORTATION RES I, V0, P6
   Department of Transport, 2011, WALK AUD TOOL, V0, P0
   Duncan DT, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P4160, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8114160
   Evans J, 2011, APPL GEOGR, V31, P849, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Fincham B, 2009, MOBILE METHODOLOGIES, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1057/9780230281172
   Forsyth A, 2015, URBAN DES INT, V20, P274, DOI 10.1057/udi.2015.22
   Forsyth A, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800701816896
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Giles-Corti B, 2014, HEALTH PROMOT J AUST, V25, P160, DOI 10.1071/HE14050
   Hein JR, 2008, GEOGR COMPASS, V2, P1266, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x
   Jones P, 2008, J RES PRACT, V4, P0
   Krambeck HV, 2006, GLOBAL WALKABILITY I, V0, P0
   Kusenbach Margarethe, 2003, ETHNOGRAPHY, V4, P455, DOI 10.1177/146613810343007
   Lashua B, 2009, MOBILE METHODOLOGIES, V0, P71
   Layeb S, 2014, INVISIBLE PLACES, V0, P0
   Lee E, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V9, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.03.004
   Lee Jo, 2006, LOCATING THE FIELD: SPACE, V0, P67
   Lee S, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P368, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
   Leslie E, 2005, HEALTH PLACE, V11, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.005
   Lindelöw D, 2014, J TRANSP HEALTH, V1, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.002
   Litman TA, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP3, DOI 10.3141/1828-01
   Mehta V, 2008, JOURNAL OF URBANISM: INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON PLACEMAKING AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, V1, P217, DOI 10.1080/17549170802529480
   Merriman P, 2014, MOBILITIES-UK, V9, P167, DOI 10.1080/17450101.2013.784540
   Moura F, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Owen N, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V33, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025
   Park S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP126, DOI 10.3141/2464-16
   Riggs W, 2017, JOURNAL OF URBANISM INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON PLACEMAKING AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, V10, P125, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2015.1111926
   Robinson J, 2002, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V26, P531, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00397
   Robinson J, 2011, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V35, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
   Sheller M, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN A, V38, P207, DOI 10.1068/a37268
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Spinney J, 2015, CULT GEOGR, V22, P231, DOI 10.1177/1474474014558988
   Thibaud J, 2017, JOURNAL OF MOBILE CULTURE, V7, P1
   Ustundag K, 2002, INSAN MERKEZLI BUTUN, V0, P0
   Van der Spek S C, 2011, C WALK21 12 ANN INT, V0, P0
   Villaveces A, 2012, INJURY PREV, V18, P291, DOI 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040223
   Yazicioglu Halu Z, 2011, WALKABILITY WALKING, V10, P29
   Yin RK, 2018, CASE STUDY RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS DESIGN AND METHODS, V6th, P0
   Yusuf A, 2015, EUROPEAN TRANSPORT, V59, P1
   Zacharias J, 2001, J PLAN LIT, V16, P3, DOI 10.1177/08854120122093249
   Zhao PJ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V86, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102417
NR 55
TC 12
Z9 14
U1 2
U2 43
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD MAR 15
PY 2023
VL 28
IS 1
BP 52
EP 69
DI 10.1057/s41289-022-00209-6
EA OCT 2022
PG 18
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA C3IU2
UT WOS:000873431100001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Wang, ZY
   Ettema, D
   Helbich, M
AF Wang, Zhiyong
   Ettema, Dick
   Helbich, Marco
TI Age as effect modifier of the associations between the physical environment and adults' neighborhood walking in the Netherlands
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Recreational walking; Transportation walking; Built and natural environments; Urbanicity; The Netherlands
ID built environment; older-adults; transport; health; impact; urban; walkability; travel; behavior; weather
AB Walking contributes to people's physical activity. While the physical environment (i.e., built and natural environmental characteristics) seems to be associated with people's neighborhood walking behavior, there is little evidence how these associations are moderated by age and vary across levels of urbanicity. This study examined the moderating effects of age and urbanicity on the associations between the neighborhood physical environment and the recreational and transportation walking of adults in the Netherlands. We used data on adults aged >= 18 years (N=65,785) taken from the Dutch National Travel Survey for 2015-2017. The outcome variable was the total duration of daily walking separately for recreation and transportation. We assessed the characteristics of the natural and built environments objectively based on respondents' home addresses within 300 m, 600 m, and 1000 m buffers. Tobit regression models with interaction terms between age and the physical environment were fitted. The results showed that age significantly modified the walking-environment associations and the moderating effects differed between weekdays and weekends. We also found that environmental characteristics (like residential density) correlated with walking differently among different age groups across urban and rural areas. Interventions intended to stimulate walking should be tailored to specific places and age groups.
C1 [Wang, Zhiyong] South China Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Transportat, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
   [Ettema, Dick; Helbich, Marco] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
C3 South China University of Technology; Utrecht University
RP Wang, ZY (通讯作者)，South China Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Transportat, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
EM zwang1984@scut.edu.cn; d.f.ettema@uu.nl; m.helbich@uu.nl
FU Utrecht University; Eindhoven University of Technology; Open Data Infrastructure for Social Science and Economic Innovations (ODISSEI) in the Netherlands
CR Amagasa S, 2019, GERIATR GERONTOL INT, V19, P861, DOI 10.1111/ggi.13730
   An HY, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17134817
   Azmi DI, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V68, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.237
   Barnett DW, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z
   Barton H, 2013, HEALTHY URBAN PLANNING, V0, P0
   Besser LM, 2021, AM J PREV MED, V61, PE13, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.013
   Böcker L, 2017, TRANSPORTATION, V44, P831, DOI 10.1007/s11116-016-9680-z
   Böcker L, 2013, TRANSPORT REV, V33, P71, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2012.747114
   Brooke HL, 2014, SPORTS MED, V44, P1427, DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0215-5
   Bürgi R, 2016, SPORTS, V4, P0, DOI 10.3390/sports4030036
   Carlson JA, 2015, HEALTH PLACE, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.12.008
   Carlson SA, 2018, AM J PREV MED, V55, P887, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.008
   CBS, 2019, BEST BOD, V0, P0
   CBS, 2015, OND VERPL NED 2015, V0, P0
   Cerin E, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0493-z
   Chaix B, 2016, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V184, P579, DOI 10.1093/aje/kww071
   Cole R, 2019, J AGING PHYS ACTIV, V27, P354, DOI 10.1123/japa.2018-0009
   Collins P, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P3030, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9093030
   Dijkstra L, 2019, OECD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKING PAPERS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1787/D58CB34D-EN
   Dunn RA, 2012, J AGING PHYS ACTIV, V20, P80, DOI 10.1123/japa.20.1.80
   Etman A, 2014, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-13-7
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ferrer S, 2015, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V33, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.014
   Fishman E, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0121871
   Forsyth A, 2009, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V14, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2008.10.003
   Gao J, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102860
   Gao J, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.006
   Gao J, 2018, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V15, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-018-0715-z
   Ghani F, 2016, PREV MED REP, V4, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.05.001
   Ghani F, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V9, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.03.010
   Guan XD, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P267, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1692965
   Hahm Y, 2019, CITIES, V89, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.020
   Hajna S, 2015, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V15, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2082-x
   Haskell WL, 2007, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V39, P1423, DOI 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27
   Helbich M, 2017, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V11, P507, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2016.1275892
   Herzog TR, 2000, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V20, P29, DOI 10.1006/jevp.1999.0151
   Herzog TR, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P653, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973179
   Kang CD, 2018, CITIES, V77, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.019
   Koohsari MJ, 2017, HEALTH PLACE, V45, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.003
   Koolhaas CM, 2017, EUR J PREV CARDIOL, V24, P934, DOI 10.1177/2047487317693952
   Larrañaga AM, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V10, P332, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2014.933986
   Li FZ, 2005, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V59, P558, DOI 10.1136/jech.2004.028399
   Li J, 2021, J GEOVIS SPAT ANAL, V5, P0, DOI 10.1007/s41651-021-00074-x
   Lin L, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.002
   Maas J, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P1763, DOI 10.1068/a4196
   Mavoa S, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16091501
   McCormack GR, 2019, HEALTH PLACE, V67, P1
   Moreno-Llamas A, 2021, HEALTH PLACE, V69, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102570
   Nagel CL, 2008, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V168, P461, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwn158
   Nello-Deakin S, 2019, TRANSP RES PROC, V41, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.005
   OECD, 2019, HEAV OD OB, V0, P0
   OECD oHSEO, 2019, NETH COUNTR HLTH PRO, V0, P0
   Okoro CA, 2018, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V67, P882, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3
   Oyeyemi AL, 2019, PHYSIOTHER THEOR PR, V35, P288, DOI 10.1080/09593985.2018.1443187
   Oyeyemi Adewale L, 2011, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V25, Pe10, DOI 10.4278/ajhp.090918-QUAN-304
   Pan KY, 2021, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V8, P121, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30491-0
   Pateman T, 2011, REGIONAL TRENDS, V43, P11, DOI 10.1057/RT.2011.2
   Pelclová J, 2012, ACTA GYMNICA, V42, P49, DOI 10.5507/ag.2012.023
   Prins RG, 2015, AGE AGEING, V44, P886, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afv103
   Rietveld P, 2000, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V5, P31, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00022-X
   Santos MSR, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P1094, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.05.009
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   Saelens BE, 2012, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V44, P637, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318237fe18
   Sarkar C, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.013
   Sarkar C, 2013, HEALTH PLACE, V19, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.10.001
   Shigematsu R, 2009, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V41, P314, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318185496c
   Shimura H, 2012, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V9, P1004, DOI 10.1123/jpah.9.7.1004
   SIEGEL PZ, 1995, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V85, P706, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.85.5.706
   Szanton SL, 2015, GERIATR NURS, V36, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.12.008
   Thorell LB, 2022, EUR CHILD ADOLES PSY, V31, P649, DOI 10.1007/s00787-020-01706-1
   Thornton CM, 2017, ANN BEHAV MED, V51, P159, DOI 10.1007/s12160-016-9837-1
   TUCKER CJ, 1979, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V8, P127, DOI 10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
   Ussery EN, 2018, AM J PREV MED, V55, P533, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.027
   Van Cauwenberg J, 2012, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V9, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-85
   Van der Vlugt AL, 2022, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V27, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.11.002
   Van Dyck D, 2013, HEALTH PLACE, V19, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.09.017
   Villanueva K, 2014, HEALTH PLACE, V25, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.10.005
   Wang Y, 2016, CITIES, V50, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.004
   Wang ZY, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V194, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110591
   Whitfield GP, 2019, PREV MED, V123, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.019
   Yang YY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101747
   Yu YC, 2023, INT J ENVIRON HEAL R, V33, P768, DOI 10.1080/09603123.2022.2048803
   Yun HY, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11123253
   Zhang XH, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P3402, DOI 10.1177/0042098020902739
NR 84
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 7
U2 43
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD APR 15
PY 2023
VL 135
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104194
EA FEB 2023
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA 8X0CR
UT WOS:000931689800001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Qiao, S
   Yeh, AGO
AF Qiao, Si
   Yeh, Anthony Gar-On
TI Understanding the effects of environmental perceptions on walking behavior by integrating big data with small data
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban planning and design; Objective and perceived built environment; Big and small data; Walking behavior; Mobile phone data
ID new-york-city; physical-activity; travel behavior; built environment; objective measures; route choice; accessibility; associations; neighborhoods; attitudes
AB Human-perceived landscape and amenities are not equivalent to the objective physical world. Traditional big data research that only uses objectively measured environments based on point-of-interest data has difficulty capturing the effect of human environmental perceptions on walking behavior. We proposed a conceptual framework to examine the effect of human perception on walking behavior by integrating travel trajectories from the "big data" derived from mobile phones and "small data" obtained from a questionnaire survey of residents living in Chengdu, China. Results show that the human subjective perceived environment is inconsistent with the objectively measured built environment. The walking behavior of individuals is completely regulated by their personal perception of the surrounding environment. Moreover, enhancing the environmental design of pathways leading to retail shops, recreational areas, and shopping centers could significantly enhance perceived accessibility and foster a more pedestrian-friendly neighborhood.
C1 [Qiao, Si; Yeh, Anthony Gar-On] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Hong Kong
RP Qiao, S (通讯作者)，Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM siqiao@connect.hku.hk
FU Human Mobility Induced Social Spatial Disparities in Super Mega City Cluster; National Natural Foundation of China (NSFC) [42301224, 71961137003]; Chan To-Haan Endowed Professorship Fund of the University of Hong Kong; Sustainability, Inequality, Mobility and Accessibility in Mega-City Regions; Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) Urban Europe; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Laboratory Program of the 2020 Guangdong New Innovative Strategic Research Fund; Guangdong Science and Technology Department [2020B1212030009]
CR AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Ajzen I, 2006, CONSTRUCTING A THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR QUESTIONNAIRE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Ball K, 2008, PREV MED, V47, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.001
   Basu R, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V163, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2022.06.007
   Batty Michael, 2013, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V3, P274, DOI 10.1177/2043820613513390
   Bean CE, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P2829, DOI 10.1177/0042098008098208
   Cabrera F, 2020, PHILOSOPHY & TECHNOLOGY, V0, P1
   Carey N, 2005, KAREN ASPELIN, V0, PPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY
   Chan ETH, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P431, DOI 10.1007/s11116-019-10062-2
   Chen C, 2007, J TRANSP GEOGR, V15, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.010
   Chen C, 2016, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V68, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2016.04.005
   Cho GH, 2011, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V43, P365, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ebec3c
   DALVI MQ, 1976, TRANSPORTATION, V5, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF00165245
   Emond CR, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V20, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.008
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Gebel K, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.008
   Gebel K, 2009, ANN BEHAV MED, V37, P228, DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3
   Golob TF, 2003, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V37, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00046-7
   Government CMPs, 2021, CHENGDUS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM RANKS FIRST IN CHINA, V0, P0
   Guo Z, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.013
   Handy S, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002
   HANEY WG, 1978, HUM ECOL, V6, P201, DOI 10.1007/BF00889095
   Heath Y, 2002, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P2154, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02068.x
   Hess DB, 2012, TRANSPORTATION, V39, P247, DOI 10.1007/s11116-011-9341-1
   Hoehner CM, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023
   Hou YT, 2020, TRANSPORT POLICY, V99, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.06.017
   Joh K, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P219, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11427914
   Keller TS, 1996, CLIN BIOMECH, V11, P253, DOI 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00068-2
   Kitchin R, 2015, GEOJOURNAL, V80, P463, DOI 10.1007/s10708-014-9601-7
   Kitchin R, 2014, GEOJOURNAL, V79, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
   Kroesen M, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V101, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.013
   Lättman K, 2016, J TRANSP GEOGR, V54, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.015
   Lin L, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.002
   Liu Y, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P512, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2015.1018773
   Lynch Kevin, 1964, THE IMAGE OF THE CITY, V0, P0
   Ma L, 2019, TRANSPORTATION, V46, P175, DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9800-4
   Ma L, 2014, TRANSPORTATION, V41, P1135, DOI 10.1007/s11116-014-9520-y
   Maruyama G, 1997, BASICS OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING, V0, P0
   Mayer-Schonberger V, 2013, BIG DATA REVOLUTION, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2014.923482
   McGinn AP, 2007, J URBAN HEALTH, V84, P162, DOI 10.1007/s11524-006-9136-4
   Mehta V, 2008, J URBANISM INT RES P, V1, P217, DOI 10.1080/17549170802529480
   Miranda AS, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V86, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101563
   MITAS L, 1988, COMPUT MATH APPL, V16, P983, DOI 10.1016/0898-1221(88)90255-6
   Moura F, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Orstad SL, 2017, ENVIRON BEHAV, V49, P904, DOI 10.1177/0013916516670982
   Pohlmann JT, 2003, OHIO J SCI, V103, P118
   Preston J, 2007, J TRANSP GEOGR, V15, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
   Qiao S, 2020, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V148, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105775
   Scott MM, 2007, J URBAN HEALTH, V84, P346, DOI 10.1007/s11524-007-9179-1
   Sevtsuk A, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V25, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.010
   Shiffrin RM, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P7308, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1608845113
   Simon HerbertA, 1957, MODELS MAN SOCIAL RA, V0, P0
   Statistics CBo, 2020, CHENGDU STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, V0, P0
   Titiunik R, 2015, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V48, P75, DOI 10.1017/S1049096514001772
   Tribby CP, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P1145, DOI 10.1177/0265813516659286
   Van der Vlugt AL, 2022, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V27, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.11.002
   Van Dyck D, 2013, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-108
   van Soest D, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P160, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1575491
NR 59
TC 40
Z9 46
U1 37
U2 226
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD DEC 15
PY 2023
VL 240
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104879
EA SEP 2023
PG 11
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA W4OL1
UT WOS:001091432600001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Li, MQ
   Sheng, H
   Irvin, J
   Chung, H
   Ying, A
   Sun, T
   Ng, AY
   Rodriguez, DA
AF Li, Meiqing
   Sheng, Hao
   Irvin, Jeremy
   Chung, Heejung
   Ying, Andrew
   Sun, Tiger
   Ng, Andrew Y.
   Rodriguez, Daniel A.
TI Marked crosswalks in US transit-oriented station areas, 2007-2020: A computer vision approach using street view imagery
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Machine learning; built environment; artificial intelligence; computer vision; active transportation
ID locations
AB Improving the built environment to support walking is a popular strategy to increase urban sustainability and walkability. In the past decade alone, many US cities have implemented crosswalk visibility enhancement programs as part of road safety improvements and active transportation plans. However, there are no systematic ways of measuring and monitoring the presence of key built environment attributes that influence the safety and walkability of an area, such as marked crosswalks. Furthermore, little is known about how these attributes change over time at a national scale. In this paper, we introduce an innovative approach using a deep learning-based computer vision model on Street View images to identify changes in intersection-level marked crosswalks around more than 4,000 US transit stations over a 14-year period. We found an increase in the overall number of marked crosswalks at intersections. Furthermore, high-visibility crosswalks became more common, as they replaced existing parallel-line crosswalks. We further examine crosswalks around transit stations in New York City and San Francisco to illustrate geographic variations and compare associations with other characteristics of the built environment as reported in the Smart Location Database. Areas with increases in high-visibility crosswalks focused on high density residential areas and areas with a higher percent of zero-vehicle households. However, geographic variations exist. For example, in San Francisco, transit station areas outside downtown or major corridors (South and Southwest of the city) had the lower prevalence of marked crosswalks. This analysis confirms important gaps in crosswalk visibility that call for safety enhancements and opens the door for additional research involving these data. We conclude by discussing the limitations and future research opportunities using computer vision to automatically detect large-scale transportation infrastructure changes at a relatively low cost.
C1 [Li, Meiqing] Univ Calif Berkeley, City & Reg Planning, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
   [Sheng, Hao; Ying, Andrew; Sun, Tiger; Ng, Andrew Y.] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
   [Irvin, Jeremy; Chung, Heejung] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
   [Rodriguez, Daniel A.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept City & Reg Planning, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
   [Rodriguez, Daniel A.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Inst Transportat Studies, Berkeley, CA USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Berkeley; Stanford University; Stanford University; University of California System; University of California Berkeley; University of California System; University of California Berkeley
RP Li, MQ (通讯作者)，Univ Calif Berkeley, Coll Environm Design, Dept City & Reg Planning, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
EM meiqing@berkeley.edu
FU National Institute for Congestion Reduction (NICR)
CR Unknown -, 2021, SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE VERSION 3.0. 55, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2009, MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS, V0, P1
   ANSELIN L, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Aston L, 2021, TRANSPORT REV, V41, P73, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2020.1806941
   Berriel RF, 2017, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V14, P1513, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2719863
   Besser LM, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V29, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.010
   Boarnet MG, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.018
   Brostow GJ, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5302, P44, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_5
   Clifton KJ, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   Crooks A, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P773, DOI 10.1177/23998083221083364
   Deng J, 2009, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP248, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206848
   Earls FJ, 1997, PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): STANFORD-BINET, V0, P0
   Fan Q, 2019, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, P0
   Federal Highway Administration, 2018, CROSSW VIS ENH SAF T, V0, P0
   Federal Highway Administration, 2018, GUID IMPR PED SAF UN, V0, P0
   Fox L, 2015, TRAFFIC INJ PREV, V16, P571, DOI 10.1080/15389588.2014.976336
   Geiger A, 2013, INT J ROBOT RES, V32, P1231, DOI 10.1177/0278364913491297
   Kang J, 2018, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V145, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.02.006
   Kingma DP, 2017, P 3 INT C LEARNING R, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1412.6980
   Li M, 2021, 17 INT C COMPUTATION, V0, P08
   Li XJ, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006
   Mitman MF, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP86, DOI 10.3141/2073-10
   Mooney SJ, 2016, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V106, P462, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302978
   Moran ME, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P2250, DOI 10.1177/23998083221081530
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2019, IMPLEMENTING STRATEG, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.17226/25444
   Neuhold G, 2017, IEEE I CONF COMP VIS, V0, PP5000, DOI 10.1109/ICCV.2017.534
   Ning H, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P7, DOI 10.1177/2399808321995817
   OpenStreetMap, 2021, TAG, V0, P0
   Ren SQ, 2015, ADV NEUR IN, V28, P0, DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031
   Sheng H, 2021, P AAAI ACM C AI ETH, V0, P221
   Zegeer CV, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP56, DOI 10.3141/1773-07
   Zhang WX, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/s18082484
NR 33
TC 26
Z9 32
U1 1
U2 46
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD FEB 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 2
BP 350
EP 369
DI 10.1177/23998083221112157
EA JUL 2022
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 8Y4VB
UT WOS:000825141800001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Huang, JX
   Cui, YM
   Li, LS
   Guo, MD
   Ho, HC
   Lu, Y
   Webster, C
AF Huang, Jianxiang
   Cui, Yuming
   Li, Lishuai
   Guo, Mengdi
   Ho, Hung Chak
   Lu, Yi
   Webster, Chris
TI Re-examining Jane Jacobs' doctrine using new urban data in Hong Kong
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Jane Jacobs; urban form; social media; walking activities; vitality
ID city
AB Jane Jacobs (1961) theorized that four urban form conditions, namely, mixed use, short block, aged buildings and density, are indispensable for the 'exuberant diversity' and conducive to, or perhaps even determinant of, the success of a city district. Jacobs' theory has been used widely as a reference point in case study research and policy and design prescriptions. We found five studies that attempted to test it more formally, using various performance indicators such as mobile phone activities, walking, crime and mortality. Their findings were inconsistent and unable to settle theoretical controversies. Questions remained as what performance indicators are most strongly associated with her urban form conditions? Are these conditions independently associated with desired outcomes or in combination and what are the interaction effects? Our study aimed to test Jacobs' theory that urban form conditions contribute to the vitality and success of city districts. Jacobs' urban form conditions were measured using GIS data for each of Hong Kong's Tertiary Planning Unit. Performance outcomes were gauged using a combination of 'new urban data', comprising Twitter activities, sentiment tones and Point-Of-Interest (POI), and 'traditional data', comprising walking commute, employment and mortality. Urban context, income and demographic indicators were used as controls in fitting spatial regression models to predict measures of performances based on urban conditions. Results showed that Jacobs' urban form conditions contribute positively to 'vitality' indicators such as the density of tweets, walking trips and POI, but not with 'failure and success' indicators such as expressed sentiment on Twitter, employment, or mortality. Out findings suggest that her theory largely hold for Hong Kong, except that dwelling density should be substituted by building density, whilst tall buildings associated positively with desirable outcomes, contrary to Jacobs' observation in the American context. More generally, we demonstrate how new urban data can be used to evaluate classic planning theories at scale.
C1 [Huang, Jianxiang] Univ Hong Kong, Sustainable High Dens Cities Lab, HKUrban Lab, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Jianxiang; Guo, Mengdi] Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Inst Res & Innovat, Shenzhen Virtual Univ Pk, Shenzhen, Peoples R China.
   [Cui, Yuming] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Architecture, 7-F Knowles Bldg,Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Lishuai] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Data Sci, 16-F Lau Ming Wai Acad Bldg,83 Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Mengdi] Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, Dept Architecture, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
   [Ho, Hung Chak] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Ho, Hung Chak] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Anaesthesiol, Sch Clin Med, LKS Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Lu, Yi] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Kowloon, Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Webster, Chris] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Architecture, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Webster, Chris] Univ Hong Kong, Hlth High Dens Cities Lab, HKUrban Lab, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Hong Kong; The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Institute of Research & Innovation; University of Hong Kong; University of Hong Kong; City University of Hong Kong; Tianjin University; University of Hong Kong; University of Hong Kong; City University of Hong Kong; University of Hong Kong; University of Hong Kong
RP Huang, JX (通讯作者)，Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, 8-F Knowles Bldg,Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM jxhuang@hku.hk
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978594]
CR Anselin L, 2016, J URBANISM INT RES P, V9, P305, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2015.1080752
   Bertrand KZ, 2013, SENTIMENT IN NEW YORK CITY: A HIGH RESOLUTION SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VIEW, V0, P0
   Booth C, 1902, LIFE LABOUR PEOPLE L, V0, P0
   Bouyer J, 2011, ENERG BUILDINGS, V43, P1549, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.010
   Census of India, 2011, MIRZAPUR DISTRICT-POPULATION 2011-2024 (NO DATE) MIRZAPUR DISTRICT POPULATION CENSUS 2011-2021-2023, V0, P0
   Chau PH, 2014, J URBAN HEALTH, V91, P1048, DOI 10.1007/s11524-014-9901-8
   De Nadai M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW16), V0, PP413, DOI 10.1145/2872427.2883084
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Flyvbjerg B, 2006, QUAL INQ, V12, P219, DOI 10.1177/1077800405284363
   FOWLER EP, 1987, SOC FORCES, V66, P365, DOI 10.2307/2578745
   Glaeser E, 2010, PRESERVATION FOLLIES, V0, P0
   Glaeser E, 2011, TRIUMPH CITY URBAN S, V0, P0
   Go-Globe, 2015, SOC MED US HONG KONG, V0, P0
   Haklay M, 2010, CARTOGR J, V47, P315, DOI 10.1179/000870410X12911304958827
   Harris R, 2011, RECONSIDERING J JACO, V0, P0
   HILL DR, 1988, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V54, P302, DOI 10.1080/01944368808976491
   HKDH, 2019, DEP HLTH VIT STAT, V0, P0
   HKLD, 2016, HONG KONG LANDS DEP, V0, P0
   Hogenboom Alexander, 2013, P 28 ANN ACM S APPL, V0, P703
   Huang JX, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104469
   Huang JX, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V206, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103977
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Kahn JH, 2007, AM J PSYCHOL, V120, P263, DOI 10.2307/20445398
   Kang CG, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1180, DOI 10.1177/2399808320919771
   Katz P, 1994, THE NEW URBANISM: TOWARD AN ARCHITECTURE OF COMMUNITY, V0, P0
   Kotkin J, 2000, NEW GEOGRAPHY DIGITA, V0, P0
   Long Y, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P406, DOI 10.1177/2399808317715640
   Lu Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.029
   Marshall A, 1920, PRINCIPLES EC, V0, P0
   Marshall S, 2012, URBAN DES INT, V17, P257, DOI 10.1057/udi.2012.22
   Montgomery Charles, 2013, HAPPY CITY TRANSFORM, V0, P0
   NEWMAN O, 1975, INT J MENT HEALTH, V4, P48, DOI 10.1080/00207411.1975.11448692
   Ng, 2000, ASIAN PLANNING SCH A, V0, P169
   ODA M, 1989, JOURNAL OF HUMAN ERGOLOGY, V18, P231
   Open Street map, 2019, ABOUT US, V0, P0
   Pryor EG, 1983, HOUSING HONG KONG, V0, P0
   Quercia Daniele, 2014, P 17 ACM C COMP SUPP, V0, PP945, DOI 10.1145/2531602.2531613
   Sarkar C, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, PE277, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30119-5
   SCHMIDT CG, 1977, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V11, P53, DOI 10.1007/BF01287248
   Silva EA, 2015, THE ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK OF PLANNING RESEARCH METHODS, V0, P0
   Sung H, 2015, J PLAN EDUC RES, V35, P117, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14568021
   Traunmueller M, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8851, P396, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_29
   Trenkner T, 2011, IS IT TIME RETIRE JA, V0, P0
   Twitter I, 2021, PROGRAMMATICALLY ANA, V0, P0
   WEICHER JC, 1973, J REGIONAL SCI, V13, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1973.tb00375.x
   Xia C, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V193, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103669
   Ye Y, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P631, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1381536
   Yeung YM, 2003, 50 YEARS PUBLIC HOUS, V0, P0
   Yue Y, 2017, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V31, P658, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2016.1220561
   Yuen B, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P583, DOI 10.1080/00420980500533133
NR 50
TC 34
Z9 37
U1 8
U2 74
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD JAN 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 1
BP 76
EP 93
DI 10.1177/23998083221106186
EA JUN 2022
PG 18
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 7V4BX
UT WOS:000808676200001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Talen, E
AF Talen, Emily
TI Who can walk? An analysis of public amenity access in America's ten largest cities
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE accessibility; public services; walkability
ID neighborhood walkability; spatial-analysis; urban parks; equity; accessibility; inequity; impact
AB How uneven is the proximity to public amenities like libraries and schools among racial groups, or children and older people? This paper uses a catchment area approach to evaluate walkable proximity to four common public amenities (parks, libraries, schools, and transit stops), looking at four racial categories and a set of variables that one might reasonably expect proximity to be related to (e.g., population density). For each of the 10 largest US cities examined, location quotients for each amenity (libraries, parks, schools, and transit stops) were calculated at three distances (0.25 miles, 0.5 miles, and 1 mile). Across all amenities, the racial group whose LQ had the greatest increase when comparing net median change between distance bands (i.e., between .25 miles and 1 mile) was Black Americans. There were large differences between the location quotient means and medians in non-White racial groups for each amenity, indicating a large amount of skew. In most cities and with most amenities, the difference between mean and median was considerably smaller in White populations, indicating a more normal curve and fewer outliers. Proximity, in other words, seems to be more homogenous in White populations. The LQs were also significantly higher in White populations across cities. Further, in all cities except Los Angeles, Asian populations were generally the most under-represented group for each catchment area around each amenity. The fact that non-White residents predominantly had lower LQs and therefore lower access (with some exceptions, for example, in the case of schools) is a generalized and problematic finding that adds to the body of evidence documenting the spatial injustices that American cities continue to manifest.
C1 [Talen, Emily] Univ Chicago, Social Sci Div, Urbanism Lab, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
C3 University of Chicago
RP Talen, E (通讯作者)，Univ Chicago, Social Sci Div, Urbanism Lab, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
EM talen@uchicago.edu
CR Adkins A, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2017.1322527
   Allen J, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V78, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.102212
   Badland H, 2019, SOC SCI MED, V232, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.001
   Boisjoly G, 2017, TRANSPORT POLICY, V55, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.011
   Chen ZF, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1380, DOI 10.1177/2399808320954221
   Conderino SE, 2021, AM J PREV MED, V61, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.014
   Cromley G, 2023, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V50, P117, DOI 10.1177/23998083221108188
   Dadashpoor H, 2016, CITIES, V52, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.12.007
   Davern MT, 2010, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V5, P105, DOI 10.1007/s11482-010-9095-5
   El-Geneidy A, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P540, DOI 10.1177/0265813515617659
   Elldér E, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P120, DOI 10.1177/0042098020951001
   Gaglione F, 2022, CITIES, V127, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103724
   Grant TL, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-677
   Gunn LD, 2022, CITIES HLTH, V6, P11
   Handy SL, 1997, ENVIRON PLANN A, V29, P1175, DOI 10.1068/a291175
   Handy S, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102319
   Hidalgo CA, 2020, HABITAT INT, V106, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102205
   Hirsch Jana A, 2017, J URBAN, V10, P181, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2016.1212914
   Horak J, 2022, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijgi11050279
   Jacobs, 1961, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM, V0, P0
   JACOBS A, 1987, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V53, P112, DOI 10.1080/01944368708976642
   King KE, 2015, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V181, P17, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwu310
   Ko K, 2021, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V23, P15, DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.23.1.2
   Kochhar R, 2018, INCOME INEQUALITY US, V0, P0
   Lee J, 2017, EDUC URBAN SOC, V49, P53, DOI 10.1177/0013124516630601
   Leung CKY, 2012, J HOUS ECON, V21, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.jhe.2012.08.002
   Lima, 2022, CANADIAN DREAM COMPA, V0, P0
   Liu D, 2023, J RACIAL ETHN HEALTH, V10, P1533, DOI 10.1007/s40615-022-01339-x
   Liu D, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V59, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127029
   Logan TM, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P897, DOI 10.1177/2399808317736528
   Logan TM, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1538, DOI 10.1111/risa.13492
   Lynch K, 1981, GOOD CITY FORM, V0, P0
   Macedo J, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P1096, DOI 10.1177/0265813515603369
   Macfarlane GS, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2289, DOI 10.1177/2399808320974027
   Nesbitt L, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V181, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.007
   Rigolon A, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V153, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017
   Song Y, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P210, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976371
   Staeheli, 2016, POWER POLITICS PUBLI, V0, P0
   Talen E, 1998, ENVIRON PLANN A, V30, P595, DOI 10.1068/a300595
   Talen E, 1998, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V64, P22, DOI 10.1080/01944369808975954
   Talen E, 2014, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V24, P717, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2014.900102
   Tieken MC, 2019, REV EDUC RES, V89, P917, DOI 10.3102/0034654319877151
   Tomasiello DB, 2023, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V50, P927, DOI 10.1177/23998083221111405
   Wang H, 2019, CITIES, V93, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
   WEKERLE GR, 1985, SOCIOL FOCUS, V18, P79
   Whitehead J, 2019, J HEALTH SERV RES PO, V24, P270, DOI 10.1177/1355819619837292
   Williams TG, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V201, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103841
   Wolch J, 2005, URBAN GEOGR, V26, P4, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4
   Wu H, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P671, DOI 10.1177/2399808319887394
   2005, 1900, P1, V0, P0
NR 50
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 3
U2 18
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD SEP 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 7
BP 1775
EP 1789
DI 10.1177/23998083221142866
EA NOV 2022
PG 15
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA X0LV6
UT WOS:000912110700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Simons, G
AF Simons, Gareth
TI The cityseer Python package for pedestrian-scale network-based urban analysis
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Computation; data science; geographical information systems; land-use analysis; morphometrics; network analysis; spatial analysis; urban analytics; urban planning; urban morphology; urbanism
ID weighting values; street
AB cityseer-api is a Python package consisting of computational tools for fine-grained street-network and land-use analysis, helpful in assessing the morphological precursors to vibrant neighbourhoods. It is underpinned by network-based methods developed specifically for urban analysis at the pedestrian scale. cityseer-api computes a variety of node and segment-based network centrality methods, land-use accessibility and mixed-use measures, and statistical aggregations. Accessibilities and aggregations are computed dynamically over the street-network while taking walking distance thresholds and the direction of approach into account, and can optionally incorporate spatial impedances and network decomposition to increase spatial precision. The use of Python facilitates compatibility with popular computational tools for network manipulation (NetworkX), geospatial topology (shapely), geospatial data state management (GeoPandas), and the NumPy stack of scientific packages. The provision of robust network cleaning tools aids the use of OpenStreetMap data for network analysis. Underlying loop-intensive algorithms are implemented in Numba JIT compiled code so that the methods scale efficiently to larger cities and regions. Online documentation is available from cityseer.benchmarkurbanism.com, and the Github repository is available at github.com/benchmark-urbanism/cityseer. Example notebooks are available at cityseer.benchmarkurbanism.com/examples/
C1 [Simons, Gareth] UCL, BSEER, UCL Energy Inst, Bldg Stock Lab, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England.
C3 University of London; University College London
RP Simons, G (通讯作者)，UCL, BSEER, UCL Energy Inst, Bldg Stock Lab, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England.
EM gareth.simons@ucl.ac.uk
CR Araldi A, 2016, 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING (INPUT 2016), V0, PP32, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.001
   Araldi A, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1243, DOI 10.1177/2399808319832612
   Boeing G, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
   Chollet Francois, 2015, KERAS, V0, P0
   Cooper CHV, 2015, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V29, P1293, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2015.1018834
   Cressie N, 1998, GEODERMA, V85, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00017-2
   Csardi G, 2006, INTERJOURNAL COMPLEX, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1087.2009.02191
   depthmapX development team, 2017, DEPTHMAPX, V0, P0
   Duque JC, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207377
   Fleischmann M, 2019, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V4, P1807, DOI 10.21105/joss.01807
   FOTHERINGHAM AS, 1991, ENVIRON PLANN A, V23, P1025, DOI 10.1068/a231025
   Foti F, 2012, GEN COMPUTATIONAL FR, V0, P0
   Gillies S, 2007, SHAPELY MANIPULATION, V0, P0
   Hagberg Aric A, 2008, PROCEEDINGS_OF_THE_7TH_PYTHON_IN_SCIENCE_CONFERENCE, V0, PP11, DOI 10.25080/TCWV9851
   Harris CR, 2020, NATURE, V585, P357, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
   Hillier B, 1984, THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF SPACE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511597237
   Jordahl K, 2020, GEOPANDASGEOPANDAS V, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3946761
   Lam SK, 2015, LLVM 15 P 2 WORK LLV, V7, P1, DOI 10.1145/2833157.2833162
   Logan TM, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P897, DOI 10.1177/2399808317736528
   McKinney W, 2010, P 9 PYTH SCI C AUST, V0, PP56, DOI 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a
   Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825, DOI 10.1145/2786984.2786995
   Peixoto TP, 2014, FIGSHARE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1164194
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Reynolds HD, 1998, THESIS U TORONTO U T, V0, P0
   ROBINSON AH, 1956, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V46, P233, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1956.tb01507.x
   Robinson WS, 1950, AM SOCIOL REV, V15, P351, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyn357
   Sevtsuk A, 2012, URBAN NETWORK ANAL T, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.3166/RIG.22.287-305
   Simons GD, 2021, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Simons GD, 2022, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Simons GD, 1900, DOI ARXIV:2106.15364, V0, P0
   Simons GD, 2021, ARXIV, V0, P0
   THOMAS EN, 1965, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V55, P492, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1965.tb00530.x
   Turner A, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN B, V34, P539, DOI 10.1068/b32067
   Yamada I, 2010, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V100, P269, DOI 10.1080/00045600903550337
NR 34
TC 9
Z9 10
U1 6
U2 32
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 5
BP 1328
EP 1344
DI 10.1177/23998083221133827
EA NOV 2022
PG 17
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA K6TA3
UT WOS:000879116100001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Shartova, NV
   Mironova, EE
   Grischenko, MY
AF Shartova, N. V.
   Mironova, E. E.
   Grischenko, M. Yu.
TI Spatial disparities of street walkability in Moscow in the context of healthy urban environment
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Built environment; Heterogeneity; Urban planning; Walking accessibility
ID neighborhood walkability; city; community; evolution; megacity; walking; form
AB Urban walkability might be one of the most important indicators of a healthy city. Taking Moscow as a case study we focused on assessing the walkability through a well-known walkability index using only open data sources. The application of the walkability index to Moscow required some adjustments in its calculation, however, the methodology used has brought the results that could be expected. The strong spatial heterogeneity in walkability was clearly identified within the city. Moreover, the walkability and social differentiation within the city boundaries could have the same spatial patterns. Despite the significant changes and evolution of urban environment throughout the Moscow's history, especially in recent years, historical context is still as impactful as before in terms of walkability. Green infrastructure might be an important component of the walkability index in the context of a healthy urban environment and well-being. Although Moscow could be identified as a green city, some areas cannot adequately provide green infrastructure for all of their residents, primarily due to the remoteness of large parks. According to the results of our study, the priority should be directed towards the improvement of consistency of the green infrastructure network and diversification of land-use in the most vulnerable areas of post-industrial development.
C1 [Shartova, N. V.] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Int Lab Landscape Ecol, Moscow 101000, Russia.
   [Mironova, E. E.; Grischenko, M. Yu.] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Fac Geog, Moscow 119991, Russia.
   [Grischenko, M. Yu.] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Fac Geog & Geoinformat, Moscow 101000, Russia.
C3 HSE University (National Research University Higher School of Economics); Lomonosov Moscow State University; HSE University (National Research University Higher School of Economics)
RP Shartova, NV (通讯作者)，Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Int Lab Landscape Ecol, Moscow 101000, Russia.
EM nshartova@hse.ru
CR Adhikari B, 2021, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V237, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113820
   Al Shammas T, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16162850
   Alden J, 1998, CITIES, V15, P361, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00031-6
   Andrusaityte S, 2020, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V223, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.09.009
   ANSELIN L, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Argenbright R, 2018, EURASIAN GEOGR ECON, V59, P408, DOI 10.1080/15387216.2019.1573693
   BARBASH NB, 1980, SOV GEOGR, V21, P557, DOI 10.1080/00385417.1980.10640352
   Bardin MY, 2020, RUSS METEOROL HYDRO+, V45, P466, DOI 10.3103/S106837392007002X
   Bogomolov AV, 2014, MANAGE SCI, V2, P0
   Bondarenko Maksym, 2018, UOSIR, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.5258/SOTON/WP00665
   Braun LM, 2016, HEALTH PLACE, V39, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.02.006
   Büdenbender M, 2017, ANTIPODE, V49, P294, DOI 10.1111/anti.12266
   Cerin E, 2020, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-020-00210-8
   Coffee NT, 2013, HEALTH PLACE, V21, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.009
   Creatore MI, 2016, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V315, P2211, DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.5898
   Deng CB, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9010036
   Doiron D, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V143, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106003
   Barbosa JPDS, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16173135
   Dovey K, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P93, DOI 10.1177/0042098018819727
   Duncan DT, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P4160, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8114160
   Engelfriet L, 2018, TRANSPORTATION, V45, P1269, DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9762-6
   Eom HJ, 2015, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V40, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.07.005
   Faisal N, 2012, PAKISTAN J METEOROLO, V9, P107
   Fan PL, 2018, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V33, P323, DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0602-z
   Figurska M, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19127447
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   Gervasoni L, 2016, 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), V0, PP2147, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2016.7840844
   Ghosh PA, 2022, J ENG RES-KUWAIT, V10, P0, DOI 10.36909/jer.ACMM.16301
   Giles-Corti B, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.011
   Glazier RH, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085295
   Golan Y, 2019, J TRANSP LAND USE, V12, P501, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2019.1472
   Golubchikov O, 2004, EUR PLAN STUD, V12, P229, DOI 10.1080/0965431042000183950
   Gullón P, 2017, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V16, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-017-0095-7
   Gunko M, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, V0, PP289, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92813-5_13
   Habibian M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V42, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.005
   HOFFMANN DL, 1991, SLAVIC REV, V50, P847, DOI 10.2307/2500466
   Hu HB, 2022, ENVIRON POLLUT, V292, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118347
   Huang JG, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V82, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.010
   Kelly C, 2015, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V12, PS70, DOI 10.1123/jpah.2012-0359
   Klimanova O, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/land10121292
   Kolbowsky EY, 2015, SPRING GEOGR, V0, PP257, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13527-4_15
   Koohsari MJ, 2021, PREV MED REP, V23, P0
   Koohsari MJ, 2020, J AM HEART ASSOC, V9, P0, DOI 10.1161/JAHA.119.016152
   Kottek M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P259, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Leslie E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
   Long Y, 2015, AUTOMATED IDENTIFICA, V0, P0
   Lukmanji A, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17061910
   Macdonald L, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2994-0
   [МАХРОВА Алла Георгиевна MAKHROVA Alla G], 2020, КОНТУРЫ ГЛОБАЛЬНЫХ ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЙ: ПОЛИТИКА, V0, P0
   Mason RJ, 2011, GEOGR REV, V101, P316, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2011.00099.x
   Mayne DJ, 2013, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-12-61
   Mena C, 2017, GEOSPATIAL HEALTH, V12, P175, DOI 10.4081/gh.2017.595
   Mota DR, 2014, PROCEDIA SOC. BEHAV. SCI., V162, P477, DOI 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.12.229
   Müller-Riemenschneider F, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-755
   Nichani V, 2021, CAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V112, P166, DOI 10.17269/s41997-020-00365-8
   Pagonis T, 2000, EUR PLAN STUD, V8, P751, DOI 10.1080/713666440
   Ramakreshnan L, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P1357, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-11305-x
   Ribeiro AI, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15122767
   Samsonov TE, 2020, RUSS METEOROL HYDRO+, V45, P515, DOI 10.3103/S1068373920070079
   Stockton JC, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3012-2
   Sugiyama T, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V33, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.035
   Sugiyama T, 2013, PREV MED, V57, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.015
   Takano T, 2002, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V56, P913, DOI 10.1136/jech.56.12.913
   Tavi L, 2020, ZH FRONTIRNYKH ISSLE, V5, P54, DOI 10.24411/2500-0225-2020-10004
   Trubina E, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V83, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102655
   Tsiompras AB, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V24, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.06.001
   Wang H, 2019, CITIES, V93, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
   Wang RY, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.009
   Wang SW, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P1821, DOI 10.3390/su6041821
   Wang ZY, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0251988
   Wei YD, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, P0, DOI 10.3390/su8010065
   Westenhöfer J, 2023, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V23, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-023-15394-4
   WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016, URB GREEN SPAC HLTH, V0, P0
NR 76
TC 13
Z9 16
U1 2
U2 45
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 141
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104469
EA JUL 2023
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA N5YG2
UT WOS:001037758300001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Noland, RB
   Iacobucci, E
   Zhang, WW
AF Noland, Robert B.
   Iacobucci, Evan
   Zhang, Wenwen
TI Public Views on the Reallocation of Street Space Due to COVID-19
SO JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
LA English
DT Article
DE active travel; complete streets; COVID-19; outdoor dining; street closures
ID physical-activity
AB Problem, research strategy, and findings Many towns and cities have reallocated street space in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This was done to allow more social distancing for physical activity and to provide space for restaurants to offer outdoor dining. We used data collected via an online Qualtrics panel of New Jersey residents (n = 1,419) to evaluate how these street closures were viewed. Did people take advantage of the opportunity to dine outside? Was walking more attractive with more space? How did respondents feel about changes in traffic patterns due to the closures? Did people walk more frequently? Results suggested that there was substantial public support for these types of interventions that allowed for more walking and more lively town centers (about 40%-45% of respondents expressed support, and only 35% had negative views; a large share was neutral). Those with negative views believed that street closures increased congestion and that outdoor dining made it more difficult to walk. Takeaway for practice In New Jersey, many towns are considering making COVID-inspired street changes permanent. There is broad support for this, though transportation agencies remain an impediment. We suggest that the current groundswell of support for street changes represents a rare opportunity to implement street design changes that support pedestrians and outdoor activities.
C1 [Noland, Robert B.; Iacobucci, Evan] Rutgers State Univ, Edward J Bloustein Sch Planning & Publ Policy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.
   [Noland, Robert B.] Alan M Voorhees Transportat Ctr, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.
   [Iacobucci, Evan] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA.
   [Zhang, Wenwen] Rutgers State Univ, Edward J Bloustein Sch Planning & Publ Policy, Publ Informat, New Brunswick, NJ USA.
C3 Rutgers University System; Rutgers University New Brunswick; University of North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill; Rutgers University System; Rutgers University New Brunswick
RP Noland, RB (通讯作者)，Rutgers State Univ, Edward J Bloustein Sch Planning & Publ Policy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.; Noland, RB (通讯作者)，Alan M Voorhees Transportat Ctr, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA.
EM rnoland@rutgers.edu; evaniaco@unc.edu; wenwen.zhang@ejb.rutgers.edu
CR Abdullah M, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V8, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100255
   Aldred R, 2020, FINDINGS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.32866/001c.17128
   Aldred R, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V20, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100958
   Unknown -, 2021, THE IMPACT OF THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC ON PUBLIC TRANSIT FUNDING NEEDS IN THE U.S., V0, P0
   Baruchman, 2020, SEATTLE TIMES 0507, V0, P0
   Bernhard A, 2020, BBC, V0, P0
   Bertolini L, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P734, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907
   Combs TS, 2021, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V9, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100322
   De Vos J, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V5, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121
   Doubleday A, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0245514
   Dumbaugh E, 2005, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V71, P283, DOI 10.1080/01944360508976699
   Dumbaugh E, 2011, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V77, P69, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2011.536101
   Gilpin, 2020, TOWN TOPICS 0729, V0, P0
   Glaser M, 2020, TRANSPORTATION RES I, V7, P100199, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100199
   Glaser M, 2021, TRANSPORT POLICY, V103, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.015
   Goldbaum Christina, 2020, NEW YORK TIMES, V0, P0
   Handy S, 2014, TRANSPORT REV, V34, P4, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2013.860204
   Hess PM, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451049
   Hipp JA, 2017, PREV MED, V103, PS15, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.014
   Hunter RF, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23937-9
   Kärmeniemi M, 2018, ANN BEHAV MED, V52, P239, DOI 10.1093/abm/kax043
   Kingham S, 2020, J TRANSP HEALTH, V18, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100872
   Kingson JenniferA, 2021, AXIOS, V0, P0
   Kirk JT, 1955, OPINIONS ATTORNEY GE, V0, P108
   Kutner, 2020, DOWNTOWNS HELP BUSIN, V0, P0
   Lydon Mike, 2015, TACTICAL URBANISM, V0, PP171, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-567-0_5
   Marsden G, 2014, TRANSP SUSTAIN, V5, P11, DOI 10.1108/S2044-994120140000005016
   Mohl RA, 2012, J PLAN HIST, V11, P89, DOI 10.1177/1538513211426028
   Montacute R, 2020, SOCIAL MOBILITY AND COVID-19: IMPLICATIONS OF THE COVID-19 CRISIS FOR EDUCATIONAL INEQUALITY, V0, P0
   Noland RB, 2022, QUESTIONNAIRE BEHAV, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.7282/00000164
   Noland RB, 2015, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V3, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2015.09.002
   Norton PD, 2008, INSIDE TECHNOL, V0, P1
   Ogilvie D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V329, P763, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38216.714560.55
   Pucher J, 2016, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V106, P2089, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303507
   Qualtrics, 2022, UNL BREAKTHR INS MAR, V0, P0
   Romero, 2020, NJ 0628, V0, P0
   Teixeira JF, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V6, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166
   Tirachini A, 2020, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V22, P1, DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1
   Wang HY, 2021, TRANSPORT POLICY, V106, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.004
   Wolf SA, 2015, J URBAN HEALTH, V92, P230, DOI 10.1007/s11524-014-9925-0
NR 42
TC 19
Z9 24
U1 2
U2 20
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0194-4363
EI 1939-0130
J9 J AM PLANN ASSOC
JI J. Am. Plan. Assoc.
PD JAN 2
PY 2023
VL 89
IS 1
BP 93
EP 106
DI 10.1080/01944363.2022.2058595
EA JUN 2022
PG 14
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 9C2XP
UT WOS:000818867200001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Rui, J
AF Rui, Jin
TI Measuring streetscape perceptions from driveways and sidewalks to inform pedestrian-oriented street renewal in Dusseldorf
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Streetscape perception; Walking potential; sDNA; Semantic segmentation; Street-level imagery
ID built environment; physical-activity; livable streets; urban design; associations; greenery; walking; view
AB The measurement of urban streetscape quality facilitates the identification of street regeneration. The emerging Street View image and semantic segmentation techniques have recently proven considerable assistance for investigating urban spatial quality. However, current studies using Google Street View (GSV) cannot explicitly reflect pedestrian perceptions, as GSVs are taken from a driveway perspective, which differs significantly from the pedestrian view. This study aims to elucidate the variance in quantitative measurements of streetscape perceptual qualities under different viewpoints and to identify the priority of street renewal based on a combined analysis between street perceptual quality and walking potential. We collected GSVs and self-photographed pedestrian views in the city center of Dusseldorf. 5300 images are gathered, and their semantic information at the pixel level is extracted by the segmentation technique DeepLab V3+. The results indicate that perspective differences have varying geographic effects on street perceptions, with the most significant effect on walkability. In addition, the combined analysis identifies renewal areas and provides planning techniques and operational standards for urban functional zones, streets, and street segments, respectively. The joint spatial syntax and image segmentation-driven approach offers a feasible paradigm for identifying fine-grained street renewal. In short, this study promotes pedestrian-centered urban measurement.
C1 [Rui, Jin] Tech Univ Dortmund, Dept Spatial Planning, August-Schmidt-Str 10, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
C3 Dortmund University of Technology
RP Rui, J (通讯作者)，Tech Univ Dortmund, Dept Spatial Planning, August-Schmidt-Str 10, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
EM jin.rui@tu-dortmund.de
FU China Scholarship Council (CSC) [202108080034]
CR APPLEYARD D, 1980, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V451, P106, DOI 10.1177/000271628045100111
   Barbierato E, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs12020329
   Bargh JA, 1996, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V71, P230, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
   Beil K, 2013, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V10, P1250, DOI 10.3390/ijerph10041250
   Biljecki F, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V215, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104217
   Burrage H, 2011, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V164, P167, DOI 10.1680/muen.900030
   Cavalcante A, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087097
   Chacra DA, 2016, JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL VISION AND IMAGING SYSTEMS, V2, P0, DOI 10.15353/vsnl.v2i1.94
   Cooper C, 2019, SPATIAL DESIGN NETWORK ANALYSIS (SDNA) VERSION 4.0 MANUAL, V0, P0
   Couch C, 2011, PROG PLANN, V75, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001
   Cresswell Tim, 2014, PLACE: AN INTRODUCTION, V0, P0
   de Vries S, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V94, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030
   Dietz J, 2019, IOP C SERIES EARTH E, V0, P0
   Ewing R, 2013, METR PLANN DES, V0, PP1, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9
   Ewing Reid, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS223, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 1987, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: USING PUBLIC SPACE, V0, P0
   Hassen N, 2016, HEALTH PLACE, V41, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.005
   Huang BX, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12093618
   Hubbard P, 2010, KEY THINKERS ON SPACE AND PLACE, V0, P0
   Jacobs Jane, 2016, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM, V0, P0
   Jones P, 2008, IATSS RES, V32, P14, DOI 10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60196-5
   Kelly CM, 2013, ANN BEHAV MED, V45, PS108, DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9419-9
   Kim JH, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101626
   Lehning AJ, 2014, J AGING SOC POLICY, V26, P102, DOI 10.1080/08959420.2014.854140
   Li Q, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910174
   Li XJ, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2039, DOI 10.1177/2399808320962511
   Li XJ, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006
   Lin L, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.002
   Liu ZL, 2017, URBAN GEOGR, V38, P381, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1191796
   Lynch Kevin, 1995, CITY SENSE AND CITY DESIGN: WRITINGS AND PROJECTS OF KEVIN LYNCH, V0, P0
   Lynch Kevin, 1964, THE IMAGE OF THE CITY, V0, P0
   Ma FD, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V60, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102256
   Ma XY, 2021, CITIES, V110, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103086
   Mahmoudi M, 2015, CITIES, V43, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.016
   McGinn AP, 2007, J URBAN HEALTH, V84, P162, DOI 10.1007/s11524-006-9136-4
   Mckee P, 2017, J URBAN HEALTH, V94, P289, DOI 10.1007/s11524-016-0124-z
   Mehta V, 2008, J URBANISM INT RES P, V1, P217, DOI 10.1080/17549170802529480
   Mehta V, 2007, J PLAN EDUC RES, V27, P165, DOI 10.1177/0739456X07307947
   Naik N, 2014, IEEE COMPUT SOC CONF, V0, PP793, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2014.121
   Owen N, 2004, AM J PREV MED, V27, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006
   Qiu WS, 2023, CITIES, V132, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104037
   Qiu WS, 2022, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 DIGITALFUTURES, V0, P242, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-5983-6_23
   Quercia Daniele, 2014, P 17 ACM C COMP SUPP, V0, PP945, DOI 10.1145/2531602.2531613
   Rapoport A, 2016, URBAN ECOL, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4009(78)90046-3
   Richards D, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V115, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106342
   Rollero C, 2010, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V30, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.003
   Saelens BE, 2003, ANN BEHAV MED, V25, P80, DOI 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   Salesses P, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068400
   Sarkar C, 2013, PLANNING RES C, V0, P0
   Van Dyck D, 2013, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-108
   Wang RY, 2019, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V18, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-019-0182-z
   Xiao Y, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.013
   Ye Y, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1439, DOI 10.1177/2399808319828734
   Ye Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.028
   Zhang F, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.020
   Zhang ZX, 2021, CITIES, V109, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103006
   Zhou H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101605
NR 60
TC 69
Z9 77
U1 65
U2 299
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 141
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104472
EA JUL 2023
PG 20
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA N8FW6
UT WOS:001039318500001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Rybarczyk, G
   Ozbil, A
   Yesiltepe, D
   Argin, G
AF Rybarczyk, Greg
   Ozbil, Ayse
   Yesiltepe, Demet
   Argin, Gorsev
TI Walking alone or walking together: A spatial evaluation of children's travel behavior to school
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Children's active school travel; walking; GIS; route detour; space syntax; spatial regression; public health
ID physical-activity; neighborhood environment; independent mobility; active travel; weight status; urban form; distance; mode; attributes; parents
AB The purpose of this research is to extend our understanding of children's walking behavior to school in an understudied region of the world, Istanbul, Turkey. Children (aged 11-17) and their parents were surveyed to comprehend subjective and objective factors on walking behavior to school when alone or with someone. Using participatory mapping and GIS, a route detour index was first created to highlight differences in walking behaviors. A robust spatial analysis, consisting of spatial statistics and a hierarchical spatial error model, then signified important survey responses, urban design factors from space syntax, and neighborhood composition and contextual variables on between-group route choices. Empirical and geovisual analysis confirmed that accompanied children deviated more from GIS shortest routes to school than their unaccompanied peers, and "hot-spot" analysis showed it was dependent on where children reside. The spatial error models exhibited notable relations among route choice, children's age, health, and gender. Parent attitudes concerning greenspace positively affected children's longer route choices, while street connectivity had the opposite influence. Surprisingly, neighborhood walkability did not impact children's route choice decisions for either group. The results provide new insights on how to encourage additional walking trips to school.
C1 [Rybarczyk, Greg] Univ Michigan Flint, Geog, Flint, MI USA.
   [Ozbil, Ayse] Northumbria Univ, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.
   [Yesiltepe, Demet] Univ Sheffield, Sch Architecture, Sheffield, England.
   [Argin, Gorsev] Istanbul Tech Univ, Urban & Reg Planning, Istanbul, Turkiye.
   [Rybarczyk, Greg] Univ Michigan Flint, Coll Arts & Sci, 303 Kearsly St,Murchie Sci Bldg, Flint, MI 48502 USA.
C3 University of Michigan System; University of Michigan Flint; Northumbria University; University of Sheffield; Istanbul Technical University; University of Michigan System; University of Michigan Flint
RP Rybarczyk, G (通讯作者)，Univ Michigan Flint, Coll Arts & Sci, 303 Kearsly St,Murchie Sci Bldg, Flint, MI 48502 USA.
EM grybar@umich.edu
FU Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [113K796]
CR Ahern SM, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V4, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2016.11.001
   Alauddin M, 2010, ECON ANAL POLICY, V40, P351, DOI 10.1016/S0313-5926(10)50034-1
   Unknown -, 2007, GROWTH REFERENCE DATA FOR 5-19 YEARS, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2019, GLOBAL ACTION PLAN ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 2018-2030: MORE ACTIVE PEOPLE FOR A HEALTHIER WORLD, V0, P0
   Broach J, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP152, DOI 10.3141/2662-17
   Bucko Agnes G, 2021, HEALTH PLACE, V72, P102707, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102707
   Buliung RN, 2017, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V9, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.06.001
   Buliung RN, 2013, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V103, P1589, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301172
   Buliung R, 2021, SOC SCI MED, V284, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114237
   Carver A, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V26, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.017
   CDC, 2022, CHILDH OB FACTS PREV, V0, P0
   Cerin E, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P1682, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d
   Clark AF, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P499, DOI 10.1177/0265813515614678
   Das R, 2023, J URBAN AFF, V45, P217, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2020.1863815
   Davison Kirsten K, 2008, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V5, P0
   De Vos J, 2016, TRANSPORTATION, V43, P771, DOI 10.1007/s11116-015-9619-9
   Demirel F, 2017, WEBRAZZI, V0, P0
   Dessing D, 2016, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-016-0373-y
   Dias C, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V99, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103279
   Ding D, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V41, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.036
   Easton S, 2015, TRANSPORT POLICY, V44, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.023
   Evers C, 2014, J TRANSP HEALTH, V1, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2014.03.003
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Fraser LK, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V42, PE77, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.007
   GETIS A, 1992, GEOGR ANAL, V24, P189, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
   Golgher AB, 2016, SPAT DEMOGR, V4, P175, DOI 10.1007/s40980-015-0016-y
   Han LY, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2536, DOI 10.1177/2399808320982303
   Hillier B, 2005, P SPATIAL INFORMA, V3693, P14
   Hillman M, 1990, ONE FALSE MOVE, V0, P0
   Hino K, 2021, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V18, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-021-01202-y
   Hume C, 2006, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V3, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-3-16
   Ikeda E, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V71, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.005
   ITMPPM, 2012, IST TRANSP MAST PLAN, V0, P0
   Jones L, 2000, HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, V59, P315, DOI 10.1177/001789690005900405
   Kaplan S, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V44, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2016.02.011
   Kwan MP, 2008, APPL GEOGR, V28, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.002
   Lee S, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18137049
   Madsen KA, 2009, ARCH PEDIAT ADOL MED, V163, P1014, DOI 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.181
   Mah S K, 2017, PREV MED REP, V6, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.04.008
   Mammen G, 2012, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-862
   Marzi I, 2018, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V17, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-018-0145-9
   Mavoa S, 2018, J TRANSP LAND USE, V11, P681, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2018.1132
   Medeiros A, 2021, WELLBEING SPACE SOC, V2, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.wss.2021.100062
   Mitra R, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V36, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.002
   Mitra R, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.01.009
   Moran M, 2016, J TRANSP LAND USE, V9, P43, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.556
   Moran MR, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V65, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.001
   MORAN PAP, 1950, BIOMETRIKA, V37, P17, DOI 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
   Müller S, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102872
   Noland RB, 2014, J TRANSP LAND USE, V7, P111, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v7i2.444
   Ortegon-Sanchez A, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182010741
   Ozbil A, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18010286
   Page AS, 2010, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V7, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-7-17
   Panter JR, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V38, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.040
   Peponis J, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P881, DOI 10.1068/b33088
   Pfledderer CD, 2021, J SCHOOL HEALTH, V91, P1014, DOI 10.1111/josh.13090
   Poitras Veronica Joan, 2016, APPL PHYSIOL NUTR METAB, V41, PS197, DOI 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663
   Putra IGNE, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00859
   Ross A, 2022, J SCHOOL HEALTH, V92, P282, DOI 10.1111/josh.13125
   Ross NJ, 2007, CHILDRENS GEOGRAPHIES, V5, P373
   Sallis JF, 2016, LANCET, V388, P1325, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30581-5
   Schlossberg M, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P337, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976755
   Schoeppe S, 2013, J SCI MED SPORT, V16, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.11.001
   SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P623, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
   Smith M, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9
   Sun GB, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V8, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.009
   TUIK, 2019, GEOGR STAT PORT POP, V0, P0
   Varoudis T, 2013, P 9 INT SPACE SYNTAX, V0, P0
   Wong BYM, 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-39
   Yang XF, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V47, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.006
   Yarlagadda AK, 2008, TRANSPORTATION, V35, P201, DOI 10.1007/s11116-007-9144-6
   Zhao J, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010071
NR 72
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 7
U2 82
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD NOV 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 9
BP 2560
EP 2578
DI 10.1177/23998083231161612
EA MAR 2023
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA X3WK3
UT WOS:000946110500001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Behnamifard, F
   Shafieiyoun, Z
   Behzadfar, M
AF Behnamifard, Faezeh
   Shafieiyoun, Zohre
   Behzadfar, Mostafa
TI Associations of Perceived and Objective Neighborhood Environment Attributes with Walking in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Walking; Physical activity; Neighborhood environment; Older adults; Objective and perceived
ID physical-activity; built environment; community design; health; women; urban; perceptions; population; safety; city
AB This study explores the perceived and objective neighborhood environment (NE) attributes affecting the elderly's walking levels in Isfahan, a historical city in Iran. A total of 603 older adults out of 874 potential participants [mean age 79.27 (+/- 9.26) years; 56% women] were recruited from 124 neighborhoods-stratified by moderate socioeconomic status levels and quintiles of walkability levels-and individually interviewed. Participants were asked to report the frequency and duration of their walking in the past week. As for participants' perceptions of the NE and social dimension, valid questionnaires including Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale and multidimensional measure of neighboring were used, respectively. Five objective GIS-derived NE attributes, including land-use mix, intersection density, housing unit density, and distance to public transportation and parks, were measured in the 500-m network buffer of each participant's home. Using the multivariate logistic regression, both unadjusted and adjusted models were calculated for 150+ min/week walkers. Results indicate that the likelihood of meeting the walking recommendations is significantly greater for those who live in neighborhoods with a higher level of sociability. Also, those who lived in more dense areas closer to parks and perceived their neighborhoods as safe, diverse, accessible, facilitated, and with higher aesthetic values were significantly more engaged in adequate walking. Our findings, contributing to the literature and practice, highlight the importance of safe and activity-friendly policymaking and community design.
C1 [Behnamifard, Faezeh] Acad Ctr Educ Culture & Res ACECR, Urban Planning & Dev Res Grp, 81-83 South Neda St, Azimieh 3155666114, Alborz, Iran.
   [Behnamifard, Faezeh; Behzadfar, Mostafa] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Architecture & Environm Design, Smart City Lab, Univ St,Hengam St,Resalat Sq, Tehran 1311416846, Iran.
   [Shafieiyoun, Zohre] Univ Art, Lab Urban Morphol Studies, 58 Sakhai St,Hafez Ave, Tehran 11368, Iran.
   [Shafieiyoun, Zohre] Sheikhbahaee Univ, Dept Urban Planning, Esfahan 8143133871, Iran.
C3 Academic Center for Education, Culture & Research (ACECR); Iran University Science & Technology
RP Shafieiyoun, Z (通讯作者)，Univ Art, Lab Urban Morphol Studies, 58 Sakhai St,Hafez Ave, Tehran 11368, Iran.; Shafieiyoun, Z (通讯作者)，Sheikhbahaee Univ, Dept Urban Planning, Esfahan 8143133871, Iran.
EM f_behnami@yahoo.com; zohreshafieyoon@rocketmail.com; behzadfar@iust.ac.ir
CR Alalhesabi M, 2021, INT REV SPAT PLAN SU, V9, P31, DOI 10.14246/irspsd.9.4_31
   An HY, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17134817
   Unknown -, 2019, GLOBAL ACTION PLAN ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 2018-2030: MORE ACTIVE PEOPLE FOR A HEALTHIER WORLD, V0, P0
   Ansari NN, 2010, APPL NEUROPSYCHOL, V17, P190, DOI 10.1080/09084282.2010.499773
   Barnett A, 2016, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-016-0377-7
   Barnett DW, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z
   BehnamiFard F, 2018, J. URBAN STUD, V7, P17
   Beygzadeh ZK, 2015, SALMAND, V10, P172
   Bödeker M, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15071363
   Bohannon RW, 1997, AGE AGEING, V26, P15, DOI 10.1093/ageing/26.1.15
   Brookfield K, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13111061
   Brown SC, 2011, J AGING HEALTH, V23, P1325, DOI 10.1177/0898264311418502
   CASPERSEN CJ, 1985, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V100, P0
   Chang SH, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.552198
   Giehl MWC, 2016, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V13, P617, DOI 10.1123/jpah.2015-0355
   Cuignet T, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P383, DOI 10.1177/0042098019852033
   de Leon CFM, 2009, J AGING HEALTH, V21, P155, DOI 10.1177/0898264308328650
   Deputy of Urban Planning and Architecture, 2016, EDULEARN PROC, V0, P0
   Ding D, 2014, J AGING PHYS ACTIV, V22, P421, DOI 10.1123/japa.2012-0332
   Edwards P, 2006, PROMOTING PHYS ACTIV, V0, P0
   Feng JX, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P2020, DOI 10.1177/0042098017702827
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Frank L, 2010, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V7, PS82, DOI 10.1123/jpah.7.s1.s82
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   Gómez LF, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V38, P592, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.005
   Guthold R, 2018, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V6, PE1077, DOI 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30357-7
   Habibi M, 2016, J ARCHIT URBAN PLANN, V9, P139
   Habibi M, 2016, URBAN STUD, V6, P99
   Hakimian Pantea, 2016, MED J ISLAM REPUB IRAN, V30, P427
   Hall KS, 2010, HEALTH EDUC RES, V25, P478, DOI 10.1093/her/cyq019
   Han A, 2021, GERONTOL GERIATR MED, V7, P0, DOI 10.1177/2333721421999316
   Herbolsheimer F, 2021, J APPL GERONTOL, V40, P1697, DOI 10.1177/0733464820979258
   Hino K, 2021, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V18, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-021-01202-y
   Inoue Shigeru, 2011, J EPIDEMIOL, V21, P481, DOI 10.2188/jea.JE20110044
   Inoue S, 2010, J EPIDEMIOL, V20, P277, DOI 10.2188/jea.JE20090120
   Irans Ministry of ICT, 2018, PROT PERS DAT, V0, P0
   Joseph A, 2007, ENVIRON BEHAV, V39, P75, DOI 10.1177/0013916506295572
   Kerr J, 2014, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V11, P1070, DOI 10.1123/jpah.2012-0159
   Kerr J, 2012, J PLAN LIT, V27, P43, DOI 10.1177/0885412211415283
   Khosravi A, 2020, HLTH ENHANCING PHYS, V0, P0
   Kim Mi-Ji, 2019, J PREV MED PUBLIC HEALTH, V52, P405, DOI 10.3961/jpmph.19.166
   Klenk J, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0153779
   LaCroix AZ, 1996, J AM GERIATR SOC, V44, P113, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02425.x
   Lee C, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634751
   Lee HS, 2015, ASIAN WOMEN, V31, P1
   Lee JH, 2023, J PLAN EDUC RES, V43, P240, DOI 10.1177/0739456X19870295
   Li FZ, 2005, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V59, P558, DOI 10.1136/jech.2004.028399
   Liu YF, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1692, DOI 10.1177/0042098016630512
   Lotfi S, 2011, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V137, P402, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000085
   Manoochehry S, 2017, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE AND GLOBAL HEALTH, V5, P70, DOI 10.15171/ijtmgh.2017.14
   Mao SQ, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182111263
   McNeill LH, 2006, ANN BEHAV MED, V31, P36, DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_7
   Moeini B, 2018, KOREAN J FAM MED, V39, P260, DOI 10.4082/kjfm.17.0121
   Moghaddam MB, 2012, WORLD APPL SCI J, V18, P1073, DOI 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18
   Montazeri A, 2009, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-341
   Mooney SJ, 2017, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V26, P495, DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0827
   Moreira BD, 2021, J AGING PHYS ACTIV, V29, P431, DOI 10.1123/japa.2020-0227
   Motamedi SA, 2002, J PSYCHOL, V6, P115
   Nagel CL, 2008, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V168, P461, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwn158
   Nyunt MSZ, 2015, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-015-0276-3
   Okuyama K, 2020, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-020-00247-9
   Pelclová J, 2012, ACTA GYMNICA, V42, P49, DOI 10.5507/ag.2012.023
   Peters M, 2020, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-020-00243-z
   Phillips DR, 2004, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V0, P163
   Saelens BE, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1552, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
   Sallis JE, 2006, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V27, P297, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100
   Satariano WA, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V38, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.031
   Saxena S, 2005, J MENT HEALTH, V14, P445, DOI 10.1080/09638230500270776
   SCI (Statistical Centre of Iran), 2016, IRI CENS DAT 2016, V0, P0
   Shafieiyoun Z, 2021, SPATIAL PLANN, V11, P133
   Skjaeveland O, 1996, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V24, P413, DOI 10.1007/BF02512029
   Smith GL, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0509-8
   Soltani T, 2015, J COMMUNITY HLTH RES, V0, P0
   STOKOLS D, 1992, AM PSYCHOL, V47, P6, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.6
   Strath S, 2007, J AGING PHYS ACTIV, V15, P412, DOI 10.1123/japa.15.4.412
   Sun F, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-449
   Thompson CW, 2014, BRIT J SPORT MED, V48, P0, DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091718
   Timperio A, 2015, PREV MED, V74, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.02.012
   Towne SD, 2016, J COMMUN HEALTH, V41, P977, DOI 10.1007/s10900-016-0180-z
   Troped PJ, 2017, ANN BEHAV MED, V51, P282, DOI 10.1007/s12160-016-9852-2
   UN-Habitat, 2014, A NEW STRATEGY OF SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING: FIVE PRINCIPLES, V0, P0
   United Nations, 2019, WORLD POPULATION AGEING 2020 HIGHLIGHTS, V0, P0
   Wang RP, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7110-9
   Wen M, 2006, SOC SCI MED, V63, P2575, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.025
   Wilson-Genderson M, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V85, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.028
   Winer E, 2017, INFLUENCE BUILT ENV, V0, P0
   Yu JB, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18052699
NR 87
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 9
U2 84
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD JUN 1
PY 2023
VL 149
IS 2
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4269
PG 10
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA D8MV6
UT WOS:000971222800020
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Müller, APS
   Dorneles, VG
   Ruiz-Padillo, A
   Romano, FV
AF Muller, Ana Paula Soares
   Dorneles, Vanessa Goulart
   Ruiz-Padillo, Alejandro
   Romano, Fabiane Vieira
TI Sidewalk Assessment from the Perspective of Accessibility: A Systematic Literature Review
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID pedestrian facility; reduced mobility; individuals; perception; design; people; needs; model; city
AB Sidewalks represent a fundamental part of the infrastructure in cities, allowing equal and barrier-free access for everyone. However, while pedestrian accessibility is a frequent concern in developed countries, it receives little attention in developing regions. Regarding studies on pedestrian infrastructure, the characteristics of the sidewalk that are considered are also varied, as well as the aspects mainly focused on by such research. Moreover, the perception of the target user group, especially of people with disabilities, can be an important topic in this area. In this context, this paper presents a systematic literature review of sidewalk assessments, focusing on accessibility, to answer the following research questions. In which contexts are sidewalk assessments carried out? Which aspects and elements are usually considered? Are people with disabilities included? We noticed that sidewalk assessments have been a recent study topic, but with less focus on the Global South. Besides accessibility, walkability stands out as a research focus, and the sidewalk elements most addressed are surface conditions and width. Finally, the perceptions of people, especially with disabilities, are scarcely considered, demonstrating an important research gap.
C1 [Muller, Ana Paula Soares; Dorneles, Vanessa Goulart; Romano, Fabiane Vieira] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Postgrad Program Architecture Urbanism & Land scap, Ave Roraima 1000, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
   [Ruiz-Padillo, Alejandro] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Mobil & Logist Lab, Ave Roraima 1000, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM); Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
RP Müller, APS (通讯作者)，Univ Fed Santa Maria, Postgrad Program Architecture Urbanism & Land scap, Ave Roraima 1000, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
EM anapaulasmuller@gmail.com; vanessa.g.dorneles@ufsm.br; alejandro.ruiz-padillo@ufsm.br; fabiromano@gmail.com
FU Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brazil (CAPES) [001]; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [422635/2018-9, 310258/2021-9]
CR ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act Standards), 2010, AM DIS ACT STAND, V0, P0
   Aghaabbasi M, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V5, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.012
   Unknown -, 2013, THE BUILDING REGULATIONS 2010, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2009, SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CRDS GUIDANCE FOR UNDERTAKING REVIEWS IN HEALTH CARE, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2020, THE NEXT FRONTIER: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND ANTHROPOCENE. BRIEFING NOTE FOR COUNTRIES ON THE 2020 HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2021, TORONTO ACCESSIBILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES, V0, P0
   Arellana J, 2021, RES TRANSP ECON, V86, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101024
   Arellana J, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P183, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
   Barnes C, 2011, J ACCESSIBILITY DESI, V1, P55, DOI https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v1i1.81
   Santana-Santana SB, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V125, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102327
   Bigonnesse C, 2018, DISABIL SOC, V33, P866, DOI 10.1080/09687599.2018.1453783
   Bivina GR, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P4929, DOI 10.1007/s10668-019-00381-w
   Campisi T, 2021, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V40, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100592
   Carvalho B, 2020, IOP CONFERENCE SERIES: EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, V503, P0, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/503/1/012098
   Coppola NA, 2021, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2675, P200, DOI 10.1177/0361198121991833
   Corazza MV, 2016, J TRAFFIC TRANSP ENG, V3, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.jtte.2016.04.001
   Costa M, 2019, IEEE INT SM C CONF, V0, PP167, DOI 10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071727
   de Freitas Pereira L, 2014, PROCEDIASOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, V162, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102327
   Denyer D, 2009, THE SAGE HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, V0, PP671, DOI 10.1080/03634528709378635
   Ferreira MC, 2022, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V91, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.004
   Fiorelli MN, 2015, REV ELECTRON GEST ED, V19, P563
   Freund P, 2001, DISABIL SOC, V16, P689, DOI 10.1080/09687590120070079
   Gamache S, 2020, JOURNAL OF ACCESSIBILITY DESIGN FOR ALL, V10, P98, DOI 10.17411/JACCES.V10I1.186
   Gehl Jan, 2011, LIFE BUILDINGS USING, V0, P0
   Halabya A, 2018, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V45, P366, DOI 10.1139/cjce-2016-0598
   Hou Q, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V119, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102772
   Ignaccolo M, 2020, EUR TRANSP, V0, P0
   Iwarsson S, 2003, DISABIL REHABIL, V25, P57, DOI 10.1080/0963828021000007969
   Kaur Harsimran, 2021, IOP CONFERENCE SERIES: EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, V775, P0, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/775/1/012004
   Kim S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V30, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.005
   Kitchenham B, 2004, GUIDELINES FOR PERFORMING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (VERSION 2.3), V0, P0
   Lee S, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P368, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
   Li HY, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P1, DOI 10.1177/0361198118757981
   Li HL, 2021, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/sym13112214
   Li Y, 2013, J URBAN HEALTH, V90, P602, DOI 10.1007/s11524-012-9779-2
   Lima JP, 2019, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V7, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2019.02.007
   Lo RH, 2009, J URBANISM INT RES P, V2, P145, DOI 10.1080/17549170903092867
   Machado MH, 2015, URBE-CURITIBA, V7, P368
   Mateo-Babiano I, 2016, TRANSPORT POLICY, V45, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008
   Murwadi H, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/su9122285
   National Technical University of Athens Greece, 2020, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, V11, P157, DOI 10.48088/ejg.y.par.11.4.179.194
   Nikiforiadis A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13010361
   Bocarejo SJP, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V24, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.004
   Pembuain A, 2020, IATSS RES, V44, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.04.002
   Rajaee M, 2021, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V16, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100975
   Rangel Pablo Andrés, 2020, AMBIENT. CONSTR., V20, P171, DOI 10.1590/s1678-862120200001003
   Rocha VTD, 2019, THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCHES IN URBAN MANAGEMENT, V14, P41
   Ruiz-Padillo A, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V109, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103392
   Schreuer N, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V15, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.100630
   Sharifi MS, 2017, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V8, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.03.003
   Silva Otavio Henrique da, 2019, AMBIENT. CONSTR., V19, P221, DOI 10.1590/s1678-86212019000100303
   Smith M, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9
   Sousa N, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000362
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Sultan B, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102831
   Tajgardoon M, 2015, INT J CARTOGRAPHY, V1, P79, DOI 10.1080/23729333.2015.1055646
   Tarawneh D, 2020, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, V2, P203
   Thomé AMT, 2016, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V27, P408, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464
   Unsworth C, 2021, DISABIL REHABIL, V43, P2253, DOI 10.1080/09638288.2019.1697382
   van Eck NJ, 2013, VOSVIEWER LEIDEN U C, V0, P0
   Xiong YB, 2020, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V146, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000547
   Yilmaz M, 2018, ICONARP INT J ARCHIT, V6, P1, DOI 10.15320/ICONARP.2018.46
   Yoon H, 2022, SENSORS-BASEL, V22, P0, DOI 10.3390/s22010380
NR 63
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 7
U2 52
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD SEP 1
PY 2023
VL 149
IS 3
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4412
PG 11
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA M4PI7
UT WOS:001030041800031
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU McAndrews, C
   Schneider, RJ
   Yang, YC
   Kohn, G
   Schmitz, A
   Elliott, F
   Pittner, J
   Purisch, H
AF McAndrews, Carolyn
   Schneider, Robert J.
   Yang, Yicong
   Kohn, Genevieve
   Schmitz, Andrew
   Elliott, Forrest
   Pittner, Jessica
   Purisch, Hans
TI Toward a Gender-Inclusive Complete Streets Movement
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE
LA English
DT Review
DE gender; complete streets; transportation planning; equity; literature review
ID physical-activity; women; travel; experiences; mobility; violence; design; neighborhood; transport; transit
AB Research offers ample insights into how people of different genders could experience transportation systems in equitable ways, but gender equity is still not part of mainstream transportation practice. We propose that Complete Streets could serve as an implementation system to advance gender equity. We provide empirical information, gender concepts, and regional cases from literatures on gender and transportation, multimodal travel, and public space to support this call to action. We find that a gender-aware Complete Streets movement would: 1) implement gender-specific tools and data; 2) address social environments and infrastructure; and 3) establish a gender-inclusive agenda to reform transportation policy.
C1 [McAndrews, Carolyn; Yang, Yicong; Kohn, Genevieve; Purisch, Hans] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Planning & Landscape Architecture, Madison, WI 53705 USA.
   [Schneider, Robert J.; Schmitz, Andrew; Elliott, Forrest; Pittner, Jessica] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Urban Planning, Madison, WI USA.
C3 University of Wisconsin System; University of Wisconsin Madison; University of Wisconsin System; University of Wisconsin Madison
RP McAndrews, C (通讯作者)，Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Planning & Landscape Architecture, Madison, WI 53705 USA.
EM cmcandrews@wisc.edu
FU Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation; Center for Transportation Equity, Decisions, and Dollars, University of Wisconsin-Madison Global Health Institute
CR Akar G, 2013, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V7, P347, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2012.673694
   Al-Mosaind M, 2018, URBAN PLAN TRANSP RE, V6, P129, DOI 10.1080/21650020.2018.1547124
   American Planning Association, 2019, PLANNING FOR EQUITY POLICY GUIDE, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2018, THE ELEMENTS OF A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2014, GEND EQ MOB MIND GAP, V0, P0
   Ball K, 2006, WOMEN HEALTH, V43, P93, DOI 10.1300/J013v43n01_06
   Bhattacharyya R, 2016, ASIAN SOC WORK POLIC, V10, P311, DOI 10.1111/aswp.12099
   Boarnet MG, 2015, J URBAN ECON, V86, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2015.01.005
   Buckley Cheryl, 1986, DESIGN ISSUES, V3, P3, DOI 10.2307/1511480
   Carolyn McAndrews, 2021, GENDER ANAL CONCEPTS, V0, P0
   Chang A, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V100, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.032
   Ciocoletto A, 2016, TRIA, V9, P169, DOI 10.6092/2281-4574/5063
   Craig L, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V76, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.006
   Crenshaw Kimberle, 1989, CHI L F, V1, P139, DOI 10.3917/drs1.108.0465
   de Gregorio Hurtado Sonia, 2016, TRIA-TERRITORIO DELLA RICERCA SU INSEDIAMENTI E AMBIENTE, V17, P0
   Ding H, 2020, J PLAN LIT, V35, P267, DOI 10.1177/0885412220911129
   Doan PL, 2010, GENDER PLACE CULT, V17, P635, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2010.503121
   European Institute for Gender Equality, 2016, GEND TRANSP, V0, P0
   Fainstein SusanLisa JServon, 2005, GENDER PLANNING READ, V0, P0
   Farrow Mira, 2018, WESTERN TRIBUTARIES, V5, P1
   Martínez CF, 2015, URBE-CURITIBA, V7, P48, DOI 10.1590/2175-3369.007.001.AO03
   Garrard J, 2012, URBAN IND ENVIRON, V0, P211
   Geraghty AB, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V37, PS420, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.09.009
   Gopal K, 2019, CITIES, V88, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.008
   Gregg K, 2019, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V13, P407, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2018.1476995
   Guggenheim N, 2014, GENDER PLACE CULT, V21, P533, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2013.802670
   Hancock AM, 2007, POLIT GENDER, V3, P248, DOI 10.1017/S1743923X07000062
   Hansmann KJ, 2022, J TRANSP HEALTH, V25, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101346
   HANSON S, 1981, TRANSPORTATION, V10, P165, DOI 10.1007/BF00165264
   Hanson S, 2010, GENDER PLACE CULT, V17, P5, DOI 10.1080/09663690903498225
   HAYDEN D, 1980, SIGNS, V5, PS170, DOI 10.1086/495718
   Huang Z, 2019, J. LANDSC. RES, V11, P19, DOI 10.16785/j.issn1943-989x.2019.4.005
   Hui N, 2018, TRANSPORT REV, V38, P73, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2017.1299815
   Jensen WA, 2017, HEALTH PLACE, V48, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.007
   Johnson AM, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN A, V46, P1892, DOI 10.1068/a46292
   Jordan SW, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000684
   Keippel AE, 2017, WOMEN HEALTH ISS, V27, PS22, DOI 10.1016/j.whi.2017.09.005
   Kim ME, 2020, SOC PROBL, V67, P251, DOI 10.1093/socpro/spz013
   Kiyota Emi, 2017, URBAN SOLUTIONS, V10, P24
   LaFrombois ME, 2019, GENDER PLACE CULT, V26, P659, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555142
   LaPlante J, 2008, ITE J, V78, P24
   Law R, 1999, PROG HUM GEOG, V23, P567, DOI 10.1191/030913299666161864
   Lee RE, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.013
   Lenker JamesA, 2016, MEASURING THE IMPACT OF COMPLETE STREETS PROJECTS: PRELIMINARY FIELD TESTING, V0, P0
   Lo AWT, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V68, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.02.009
   Loukaitou-Sideris A, 2006, J PLAN LIT, V20, P219, DOI 10.1177/0885412205282770
   Loukaitou-Sideris Anastasia, 2010, NO TITLE CAPTURED, V1, P103
   Lubitow A, 2017, GENDER PLACE CULT, V24, P1398, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2017.1382451
   Maciejewska M, 2020, GENDER PLACE CULT, V27, P809, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2019.1639631
   Mahadevia D, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V44, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2016.01.002
   Mai N, 2009, MOBILITIES-UK, V4, P295, DOI 10.1080/17450100903195318
   Marsden G, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P905, DOI 10.1068/a44210
   Massey Doreen, 1994, SPACE PLACE, V0, P0
   McAndrews C, 2013, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V38, P749, DOI 10.1177/0162243913493675
   McCann Barbara, 2010, 559 PAS, V0, P0
   McLaren AT, 2015, GENDER PLACE CULT, V22, P1426, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2014.970141
   Moreland-Russell S, 2013, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V19, PS89, DOI 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182849ec2
   Payne S, 2011, SOC POLIT, V18, P515, DOI 10.1093/sp/jxr019
   Pollard TM, 2017, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4253-4
   Porter JM, 2019, J TRANSP LAND USE, V12, P619, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2019.1512
   Prati G, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V66, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.003
   Roberton J, 2016, TRIA, V9, P79, DOI 10.6092/2281-4574/3969
   Rosenbloom Sandra, 2020, 100 YEARS, V0, P0
   Sallis JF, 2008, HEALTH BEHAVIOR AND HEALTH EDUCATION: THEORY, V0, P0
   sANCHEz DE MADARIAGA I, 2004, CIUDADES: REVISTA DEL INSTITUTO UNIVERSITARIO DE URBANISTICA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID, V0, PP101, DOI 10.24197/ciudades.08.2004.101-133
   de Madariaga IS, 2013, FAIR SHARED CITIES: THE IMPACT OF GENDER PLANNING IN EUROPE, V0, P33
   SANDERCOCK L, 1992, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V58, P49, DOI 10.1080/01944369208975534
   Sansone C, 2019, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGAGEMENT IN COMPLETE STREETS INITIATIVES: EXAMPLES AND LESSONS LEARNED, V0, P0
   Sasha Costanza-Chock, 2018, P DES RES SOC U LIM, V0, P0
   Scheiner J, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V24, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.02.011
   Schneider RJ, 2018, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V108, P431, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304317
   Schulz AJ, 2015, HEALTH EDUC BEHAV, V42, P380, DOI 10.1177/1090198114560015
   Singh YJ, 2020, J GENDER STUD, V29, P832, DOI 10.1080/09589236.2019.1650728
   Siqueira LD, 2016, TRIA, V9, P37, DOI 10.6092/2281-4574/3966
   Smart Growth America, 2021, INVENTORY OF ALL COMPLETE STREETS POLICIES, V0, P0
   Smart Growth America and National Complete Streets Coalition, 2017, BEST COMPL STREETS P, V0, P0
   Smart MJ, 2017, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V6, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2016.07.001
   Song L, 2019, SINGAPORE J TROP GEO, V40, P140, DOI 10.1111/sjtg.12257
   Transportation Research Board, 2005, TECHNICAL PAPERS, V2, P0
   Rivadeneyra AT, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP187, DOI 10.3141/2531-22
   Vandegrift D, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V171, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.004
   Venter C, 2019, FROM MOBILITY TO ACCESS FOR ALL: EXPANDING URBAN TRANSPORTATION CHOICES IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH, V0, P0
   Villagrán PS, 2017, REV TRANSP TERRIT, V0, PP127, DOI 10.34096/rtt.i16.3606
   Ward BeverlyG, 2000, DOCTORAL DISSERTATION, V0, P0
   Weintrob A, 2021, MOBILITIES-UK, V16, P775, DOI 10.1080/17450101.2021.1958249
   Wittbom Eva, 2011, 4 INT C WOM ISS TRAN, V0, P264
   Wood A, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN A, V46, P2654, DOI 10.1068/a140016p
   Zavetoski Stephen, 2015, INCOMPLETE STREETS, V0, P21
NR 88
TC 9
Z9 10
U1 3
U2 36
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0885-4122
EI 1552-6593
J9 J PLAN LIT
JI J. Plan. Lit.
PD FEB 15
PY 2023
VL 38
IS 1
BP 3
EP 18
DI 10.1177/08854122221087472
EA MAR 2022
PG 16
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA Z0QD9
UT WOS:000773814000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Vale, D
   Lopes, AS
AF Vale, David
   Lopes, Andre Soares
TI Accessibility inequality across Europe: a comparison of 15-minute pedestrian accessibility in cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants
SO NPJ URBAN SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
ID social exclusion; active-transport; walk score(r); trip purpose; urban form; walkability; travel; environments; destinations; behavior
AB Active accessibility is a paramount objective of current sustainable urban development policies. Recently, the 15-minute city concept emphasized this framework by stressing proximity as a key urban feature. In this paper, we use two accessibility indicators-cumulative opportunities (total destinations) and Variety (number of different types of opportunities)-to evaluate pedestrian accessibility, using a 15-minute threshold, in a sample of European cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants, and measure within-city and between-city inequality, by calculating pseudo-Gini coefficients. Our results show not only that European cities are not 15-minute cities yet, but also that there is significant inequality within them, although less so in cities with high Variety. Our cross-city comparison found diminishing returns between both total destinations and population density and between Variety and density. Our findings suggest that European cities can increase pedestrian accessibility and reduce internal inequality by increasing the Variety of opportunities accessible by foot, along with improvements to pedestrian infrastructure.
C1 [Vale, David; Lopes, Andre Soares] Univ Lisbon, Lisbon Sch Architecture, Res Ctr Architecture Urbanism & Design, CIAUD, Rua Sa Nogueira, Lisbon, Portugal.
C3 Universidade de Lisboa
RP Vale, D; Lopes, AS (通讯作者)，Univ Lisbon, Lisbon Sch Architecture, Res Ctr Architecture Urbanism & Design, CIAUD, Rua Sa Nogueira, Lisbon, Portugal.
EM dvale@fa.ulisboa.pt; soareslopes@gmail.com
FU This work is financed by national funds through FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the Project with the reference PTDC/GES-TRA/3353/2020. [PTDC/GES-TRA/3353/2020]; national funds through FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P.
CR Adhikari P, 2017, J LAND USE SCI, V12, P105, DOI 10.1080/1747423X.2017.1280550
   Alonso William, 1964, LOCATION AND LAND USE. TOWARD A GENERAL THEORY OF LAND RENT., V0, P0
   Asher L, 2012, AGE AGEING, V41, P690, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afs076
   Banister D, 2018, INEQUALITY IN TRANSPORT, V0, P0
   Basiri A, 2019, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V33, P1588, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2019.1593422
   Boeing G, 2022, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V10, PE907, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00072-9
   Buehler R, 2017, TRANSPORT REV, V37, P4, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2016.1177799
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Cervero R, 2009, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V3, P203, DOI 10.1080/15568310802178314
   Clark A, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P284, DOI 10.1177/0042098013489742
   Da Silva DC, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12010129
   Dolega L, 2016, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V28, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.08.013
   Duncan DT, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P4160, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8114160
   EC, 2020, SUST SMART MOB STRAT, V0, P0
   Ferster C, 2020, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V14, P64, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2018.1519746
   Fina S, 2022, J TRANSP HEALTH, V27, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101486
   Foti F, 2012, NO TITLE CAPTURED, V0, P1
   Gaglione F, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V90, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102687
   Geurs KT, 2004, J TRANSP GEOGR, V12, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Gotelli NJ, 2001, ECOL LETT, V4, P379, DOI 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
   Hagerstrand T, 1970, PAPERS REGIONAL SCI, V24, P7, DOI 10.1111/J.1435-5597.1970.TB01464.X
   Hall CM, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V61, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.018
   Handy S, 2005, ACCESS TO DESTINATIONS, V0, P131
   Healey P, 2002, URBAN STUD, V39, P1777, DOI 10.1080/0042098022000002957
   Jacobs J, 1992, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Kompil M, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.047
   Larsen J, 2022, J PLAN LIT, V37, P554
   Lee C, 2006, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V11, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003
   Levinson D, 2020, TRANSFERS MAGAZINE, V5, P0
   Logan TM, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P897, DOI 10.1177/2399808317736528
   Lucas K, 2016, TRANSPORTATION, V43, P473, DOI 10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
   Lucas K, 2012, TRANSPORT POLICY, V20, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Mackett RL, 2015, J TRANSP HEALTH, V2, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2015.07.006
   Martens Karel, 2019, MEASURING TRANSPORT, V0, PP13, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-814818-1.00002-0
   Millward H, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012
   Moura F, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Mueller N, 2015, PREV MED, V76, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010
   Newman PeterJeffrey Kenworthy, 2015, THE END OF AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCE: HOW CITIES ARE MOVING BEYOND CAR-BASED PLANNING, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-613-4
   Openshaw S, 1984, MODIFIABLE AREAL UNI, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.21428/CB6AB371.5C28C076
   Perchoux C, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.04.002
   Pereira MF, 2020, J TRANSP HEALTH, V18, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100893
   Pereira RHM, 2017, TRANSPORT REV, V37, P170, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660
   Pucher J, 2006, TRANSPORT POLICY, V13, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.001
   Rey SJ, 2007, REV REG STUD, V37, P5
   Seong EY, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P834, DOI 10.1177/23998083211021870
   Shashank A, 2019, HEALTH PLACE, V55, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005
   Shatu F, 2021, FINDINGS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.32866/001c.27391
   Sorton A, 1994, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1438, P17, DOI 10.3141/1636-03
   Talavera-Garcia R, 2015, CITIES, V45, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003
   Tasseron G, 2017, J ADV TRANSPORT, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1155/2017/1812045
   Tenkanen Henrikki, 2020, ZENODO, V0, P0
   Tsai YH, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P141, DOI 10.1080/0042098042000309748
   Vale DS, 2016, J TRANSP LAND USE, V9, P209, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.593
   Vale DS, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P740, DOI 10.1177/0265813516641685
   Vale DS, 2017, J GEOGR SYST, V19, P43, DOI 10.1007/s10109-016-0240-z
   Vale DS, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V10, P730, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2016.1144836
   van Wee B, 2011, EUR J TRANSP INFRAST, V11, P350
   Weng M, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005
   Wilson AG, 1970, ENTROPY IN URBAN AND REGIONAL MODELING, V0, P0
   Winters M, 2016, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-016-0339-0
   Wu H, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, P0, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00020-2
   Yang Y, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V43, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015
NR 62
TC 52
Z9 62
U1 6
U2 59
PU SPRINGERNATURE
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 
EI 2661-8001
J9 NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN
JI npj Urban Sustain.
PD NOV 17
PY 2023
VL 3
IS 1
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1038/s42949-023-00133-w
PG 13
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA Y3FR8
UT WOS:001104166300001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Ma, FD
   Jin, YE
   Baek, S
   Yoon, H
AF Ma, Fengdi
   Jin, Yeongeun
   Baek, Seungjoo
   Yoon, Heeyeun
TI Influence of path design cooling strategies on thermal conditions and pedestrian walkability in high-rise residential complexes
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model; Agent -based Model (ABM); Cooling effects; Pedestrian walkability; Path design
ID urban heat; biometeorological assessment; skin temperature; street canyon; comfort; impact; microclimate; performance; trees; mitigation
AB Intensive urbanization exacerbates overheating in cities, leading to negative impacts on human health. Although numerous studies have investigated the improvement of pedestrian comfort through street-level treatments, few have examined the influence on pedestrian walkability, and the spatial extent of cooling effects from paths to adjacent areas remains unevaluated. This study assesses the cooling effects of different mitigation strategies on four thermal indicators-surface temperature (Tsurf), air temperature (Ta), mean radiant temperature (MRT), and physiological equivalent temperature (PET)-using ENVI-met simulations. We employ Agent-based Models (ABM) to analyze pedestrian walkability through perceived travel time (PTT). The study focuses on two high-rise residential complexes in Suwon City, South Korea, and compares reflective pavement, single-row tree planting, and clustered tree planting mitigation strategies. Results indicate that single-row planting offers more significant cooling effects across the entire site compared to other strategies, while clustered planting improves local heat conditions. Cooling effects extend from the path to the entire block, with single-row planting reducing Tsurf by up to 5.5 & DEG;C, Ta by 0.2 & DEG;C, MRT by 16.2 & DEG;C, and PET by 5.8 & DEG;C at 12.72 m away from paths during the hottest hours. ABM results suggest that single-row planting provides the best PTT reduction and can be up to 36.24 %. The proposed framework and findings provide urban designers with a data-driven approach to optimize pedestrian thermal comfort and walkability.
C1 [Ma, Fengdi] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
   [Jin, Yeongeun; Baek, Seungjoo] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture & Rural Syst Engn, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
   [Yoon, Heeyeun] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr Life Sci, Coll Agr & Life Sci Integrated Major Smart City Gl, Dept Landscape Architecture & Rural Syst Engn, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
C3 Seoul National University (SNU); Seoul National University (SNU); Seoul National University (SNU)
RP Yoon, H (通讯作者)，Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr Life Sci, Coll Agr & Life Sci Integrated Major Smart City Gl, Dept Landscape Architecture & Rural Syst Engn, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea.
EM hyyoon@snu.ac.kr
FU Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University; Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea; National Research Foundation of Korea; Knowledge-based environmental service Program and Climate Change Ramp;D Project for New Climate Regime - Ministry of Environment;  [NRF-2021S1A3A2A01087370];  [2022003570007]
CR Abdi B, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102085
   Alfakara A, 2014, P S SIM ARCH URB DES, V0, P0
   Ali-Toudert F, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.013
   Andreou E, 2013, RENEW ENERG, V55, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.040
   Unknown -, 2005, ERGONOMICS THERMAL E, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2004.11.005
   Unknown -, 1998, ISO 7726 ERGONOMICS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1111/INA.12748
   AnyLogic User Manual, 2021, MODELING SIMULATION, V0, P0
   Atwa S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V59, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102198
   Azevedo JA, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs8020153
   Barakat M, 2016, WINT SIMUL C PROC, V0, PP1328, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2016.7822187
   Bartesaghi-Koc C, 2021, SOL ENERGY, V216, P564, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.043
   Bartesaghi-Koc C, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V203, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103893
   Bohnenstengel SI, 2011, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V137, P1625, DOI 10.1002/qj.855
   Bonan G, 2015, ECOLOGICAL CLIMATOLO, V0, P0
   Chen L, 2012, CITIES, V29, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.006
   Cheng J, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V177, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108610
   Cohen P, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V37, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.001
   Conti S, 2005, ENVIRON RES, V98, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2004.10.009
   Coutts AM, 2016, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V124, P55, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1409-y
   Eliasson I, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V82, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.020
   Fanger PO, 1970, THERMAL COMFORT. ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING., V0, P0
   Feng XW, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100938
   Ferrari A, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V31, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100534
   Fonseca F, 2022, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V16, P660, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2021.1914793
   Foster S, 2021, ENVIRON BEHAV, V53, P3, DOI 10.1177/0013916519853300
   Ghaffarianhoseini A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V666, P1327, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.284
   Girling C, 2019, J URBAN INT RES PLAC, V12, P456, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2019.1626269
   Gregory J, 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, V0, P0
   Gromke C, 2008, ATMOS ENVIRON, V42, P8640, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.019
   Gromke C, 2009, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V131, P19, DOI 10.1007/s10546-008-9301-2
   Hardwick SR, 2015, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V201, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.010
   Heaviside C, 2015, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V141, P1429, DOI 10.1002/qj.2452
   Holst J, 2011, METEOROL Z, V20, P541, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0254
   Höppe P, 1999, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V43, P71, DOI 10.1007/s004840050118
   Huang JX, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V103, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.03.029
   Jeong MA, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V15, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.005
   Ji WJ, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V156, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.037
   Johansson E, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V10, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.12.002
   Kakao Map, 2021, SAT IM, V0, P0
   Kántor N, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V98, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.008
   Eun-Jung Kim, 2019, JOURNAL OF KOREAN TRADITIONAL COSTUME, V0, P0
   Konarska J, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P2379, DOI 10.1002/joc.4502
   Korean National Geographic Information Institute, 2021, AER PHOT, V0, P0
   Kosatsky T, 2005, EURO SURVEILL, V10, P3, DOI 10.2807/esm.10.07.00552-en
   Lai DY, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V77, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.026
   Lee H, 2013, ADV METEOROL, V2013, P0, DOI 10.1155/2013/312572
   Lee H, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V148, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.004
   Lee LSH, 2020, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V64, P547, DOI 10.1007/s00484-019-01840-9
   Li D, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, P0, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aau4299
   Li KM, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V133, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.013
   Li YF, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-16461-9
   Liu H, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V73, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.007
   Liu ZX, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V200, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107939
   Liu ZX, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V50, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126646
   Liu ZX, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/atmos9050198
   Macal CM, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, P2, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574234
   Mahmoud AHA, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P2641, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.06.025
   MAYER H, 1987, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V38, P43, DOI 10.1007/BF00866252
   Middel A, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, P0, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab87d4
   Morakinyo TE, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V137, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.012
   Morakinyo TE, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V115, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.01.005
   Morakinyo TE, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V103, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.025
   Ng E, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V55, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.025
   Nitschke M, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-10-42
   Ouyang WL, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V174, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106772
   Pakarnseree R, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V143, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.042
   Parsaee M, 2019, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V14, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100341
   Potchter O, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V631-632, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.276
   Qin YH, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V96, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.03.005
   Qiu GY, 2013, J INTEGR AGR, V12, P1307, DOI 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60543-2
   Rahul A, 2020, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V64, P1933, DOI 10.1007/s00484-020-01981-2
   Rakha T, 2015, TOWARDS COMFORTABLE AND WALKABLE CITIES: SPATIALLY RESOLVED OUTDOOR THERMAL COMFORT ANALYSIS LINKED TO TRAVEL SURVEY-BASED HUMAN ACTIVITY SCHEDULES, V0, P0
   Sanaieian H, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V38, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.007
   Shinzato P, 2019, ARCHIT SCI REV, V62, P112, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2018.1563522
   Su Y, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V261, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111557
   Suwon Meteorological Administration, 2019, INT MET OBS, V0, P0
   Taleghani M, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.05.007
   Thompson R, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH, V161, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.008
   Tseliou A, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V44, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101217
   Tsiompras AB, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V24, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.06.001
   Tsoka S, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V43, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.009
   Tucker P, 2007, PUBLIC HEALTH, V121, P909, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.009
   Vailshery LS, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.03.002
   Wang CH, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107593
   Wang H, 2019, CITIES, V93, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
   Wang XB, 2017, PREV MED, V100, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.04.008
   Wang Y, 2016, CITIES, V50, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.004
   Wang YP, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.013
   Whitman S, 1997, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V87, P1515, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.87.9.1515
   Wong NH, 2010, ARCHIT SCI REV, V53, P196, DOI 10.3763/asre.2009.0029
   Yang JC, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V47, P830, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.092
   Yang J, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101487
   Zhang H, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.015
   Zhang YQ, 2017, ENVIRON POLLUT, V225, P700, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.066
   Zhao QS, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V32, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.022
   Zhou M, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V82, P3582, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.102
   Zhou XF, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V635, P1467, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.091
NR 97
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 9
U2 57
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD AUG 15
PY 2023
VL 86
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127981
EA JUN 2023
PG 20
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban Studies
GA K6WS7
UT WOS:001017832800001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Lachapelle, JA
   Krayenhoff, ES
   Middel, A
   Coseo, P
   Warland, J
AF Lachapelle, Jacob A.
   Krayenhoff, E. Scott
   Middel, Ariane
   Coseo, Paul
   Warland, Jon
TI Paper Maximizing the pedestrian radiative cooling benefit per street tree
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Pedestrian thermal comfort; Urban forestry; Microclimate modelling; Radiative heat exposure; Green infrastructure design; Sidewalk shade
ID outdoor thermal comfort; climate-change; urban; vegetation; environment; strategy; city; spaces; hot
AB Outdoor heat stress is a growing problem in cities during hot weather. City planners and designers require more pedestrian-centered approaches to understand sidewalk microclimates. Radiation loading, as quantified by mean radiant temperature (TMRT), is a key factor driving poor thermal comfort. Street trees provide shade and consequently reduce pedestrian TMRT. However, placement of trees to optimize the cooling they provide is not yet well understood. We apply the newly-developed TUF-Pedestrian model to quantify the impacts of sidewalk tree coverage on pedestrian TMRT during summer for a lowrise neighbourhood in a midlatitude city. TUF-Pedestrian captures the detailed spatio-temporal variation of direct shading and directional longwave radia-tion loading on pedestrians resulting from tree shade. We conduct 190 multi-day simulations to assess a full range of sidewalk street tree coverages for five high heat exposure locations across four street orientations. We identify street directions that exhibit the largest TMRT reductions during the hottest periods of the day as a result of tree planting. Importantly, planting a shade tree on a street where none currently exist provides approximately 1.5-2 times as much radiative cooling to pedestrians as planting the same tree on a street where most of the sidewalk already benefits from tree shade. Thus, a relatively equal distribution of trees among sun-exposed pedestrian routes and sidewalks within a block or neighbourhood avoids mutual shading and therefore opti-mizes outdoor radiative heat reduction per tree during warm conditions. Ultimately, street tree planting should be a place-based decision and account for additional environmental and socio-political factors.
C1 [Lachapelle, Jacob A.; Krayenhoff, E. Scott; Warland, Jon] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Sci, Guelph, ON, Canada.
   [Middel, Ariane] Arizona State Univ, Sch Arts Media & Engn, Tempe, AZ USA.
   [Middel, Ariane] Arizona State Univ, Sch Comp & Augmented Intelligence, Tempe, AZ USA.
   [Coseo, Paul] Arizona State Univ, Design Sch, Tempe, AZ USA.
   [Krayenhoff, E. Scott] 50 Stone Rd East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
C3 University of Guelph; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe
RP Krayenhoff, ES (通讯作者)，50 Stone Rd East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
EM jlachape@uoguelph.ca; skrayenh@uoguelph.ca; ariane.middel@asu.edu; paul.coseo@asu.edu; jwarland@uoguelph.ca
FU NSERC Discovery Grant
CR Ali-Toudert F, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.013
   Ali-Toudert F, 2007, SOL ENERGY, V81, P742, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2006.10.007
   ASHRAE, 2001, ASHRAE FUNDAMENTALS, V0, P0
   Christen A, 2010, A LIDAR-BASED URBAN METABOLISM APPROACH TO NEIGHBOURHOOD SCALE ENERGY AND CARBON EMISSIONS MODELLING, V0, P0
   Coutts AM, 2016, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V124, P55, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1409-y
   Dosio A, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, P0, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab827
   Duneier M, 2001, SIDEWALK, V0, P0
   Dzyuban Y, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V834, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155294
   Forsyth A, 2015, URBAN DES INT, V20, P274, DOI 10.1057/udi.2015.22
   Gehl J, 1987, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS, V23, P0
   Gillner S, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.005
   Gulyás A, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1713, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.001
   Hamstead Z, 2019, JOURNAL OF EXTREME EVENTS, V06, P2003001, DOI 10.1142/s2345737620030013
   Hoppe P, 1992, WETTER UND LEBEN, V44, P147
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jendritzky G, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P421, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0513-7
   Johansson E, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1326, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.022
   Kántor N, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.030
   Kántor N, 2016, OPEN GEOSCI, V8, P231, DOI 10.1515/geo-2016-0021
   Karttunen S, 2020, ATMOS ENVIRON-X, V6, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100073
   Krayenhoff ES, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, P0, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abdcf1
   Krayenhoff ES, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V32, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100590
   Krayenhoff ES, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P1097, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0320-9
   Lachapelle JA, 2022, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V66, P833, DOI 10.1007/s00484-022-02241-1
   Lai DY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V661, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.062
   Lee H, 2014, METEOROL Z, V23, P315, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2014/0536
   Lindberg F, 2011, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V105, P311, DOI 10.1007/s00704-010-0382-8
   McGreevy M, 2021, URBAN POLICY RES, V39, P377, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2021.1926226
   Middel A, 2021, B AM METEOROL SOC, V102, PE1805, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0193.2
   Middel A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V687, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.085
   Middel A, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.010
   Millward AA, 2014, ENVIRON MANAGE, V53, P1043, DOI 10.1007/s00267-014-0260-8
   Morakinyo TE, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V719, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137461
   Norton BA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018
   Oke TR, 2017, URBAN CLIMATES, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781139016476
   OKE TR, 1991, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V56, P339, DOI 10.1007/BF00119211
   OKE TR, 1989, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V324, P335, DOI 10.1098/rstb.1989.0051
   Park CY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101521
   Picot X, 2004, ENERG BUILDINGS, V36, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.044
   Shashua-Bar L, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P1498, DOI 10.1002/joc.2177
   Smithers RJ, 2018, URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, V21, P851, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0761-y
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Stone B, 2019, J EXTREME EVENTS, V6, P0
   Taleghani M, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, P0, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/024003
   Thorsson S, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P324, DOI 10.1002/joc.2231
   Turner VK, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, P0, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac73a9
   Vos PEJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V183, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.10.021
   Whyte WH, 1980, THE SOCIAL LIFE OF SMALL URBAN SPACES, V0, P0
   Zheng BH, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10114192
   Ziter CD, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P7575, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1817561116
NR 50
TC 62
Z9 67
U1 6
U2 134
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD FEB 15
PY 2023
VL 230
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104608
EA OCT 2022
PG 18
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 6A6FI
UT WOS:000880748600003
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Nehiba, C
   Tyndall, J
AF Nehiba, Cody
   Tyndall, Justin
TI Highways and pedestrian deaths in US neighborhoods
SO REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Transportation; Safety; Traffic fatalities; Inequality
ID social inequality; traffic injury; externality; association; policy; trucks; roads
AB Over 100,000 pedestrians have been struck and killed by vehicles on US roadways in the first two decades of the 21st century, representing an alarming public health issue. We examine the US Interstate Highway System's legacy in contributing to local pedestrian deaths using historical Interstate Highway plans as an instrument for local Interstate construction. Operating an Interstate through a census tract increased local pedestrian deaths significantly. Among 17,000 tracts bisected by Interstates, we estimate the average tract experienced 2.5 additional pedestrian deaths between 2001-2020 due to the presence of the Interstate. We find these deaths occur disproportionately in Black communities.
C1 [Nehiba, Cody] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Econ, Washington, DC 20004 USA.
   [Tyndall, Justin] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Econ Res Org, Honolulu, HI USA.
   [Tyndall, Justin] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Econ, Honolulu, HI USA.
C3 United States Environmental Protection Agency; University of Hawaii System; University of Hawaii Manoa; University of Hawaii System; University of Hawaii Manoa
RP Nehiba, C (通讯作者)，US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Econ, Washington, DC 20004 USA.
EM Nehiba.Cody@epa.gov; jtyndall@hawaii.edu
CR Anderson M, 2008, J HEALTH ECON, V27, P973, DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.001
   Anderson ML, 2014, REV ECON STUD, V81, P535, DOI 10.1093/restud/rdt035
   Ang A, 2020, J PUBLIC ECON, V184, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104155
   Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, V0, P1
   Archer DN, 2021, IOWA LAW REV, V106, P2125
   Bauernschuster S, 2022, J PUBLIC ECON, V210, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104663
   Baum-Snow N, 2007, Q J ECON, V122, P775, DOI 10.1162/qjec.122.2.775
   Baum-Snow N, 2020, REV ECON STAT, V102, P929, DOI 10.1162/rest_a_00855
   Baum-Snow N, 2017, REV ECON STAT, V99, P435, DOI 10.1162/REST_a_00660
   Brinkman J, 2022, REV. ECON. STAT., V0, P1
   Brinkman J, 2022, EC INSIGHTS, V7, P17
   Brooks L, 2020, EVIDENCE FROM THE STATES, V0, P0
   Chen P, 2019, J SAFETY RES, V68, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.11.002
   Chen P, 2016, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V86, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.002
   Cunningham S, 2022, CAUSAL INFERENCE: THE MIXTAPE, V0, P0
   Currie J, 2011, AM ECON J-APPL ECON, V3, P65, DOI 10.1257/app.3.1.65
   de Palma A, 2008, J URBAN ECON, V64, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.005
   DiMaggio C, 2015, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V26, P247, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000222
   Dumbaugh E, 2012, EXAMINING THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENTAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CRASHES INVOLVING PEDESTRIANS, V0, P0
   Edwards M, 2022, J. SAF. RES., V0, P0
   Hansen B, 2015, AM ECON REV, V105, P1581, DOI 10.1257/aer.20130189
   Herzog I, 2021, J URBAN ECON, V122, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103316
   Hoek G, 2002, LANCET, V360, P1203, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11280-3
   Hwang J, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V6, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2017.05.003
   Jaworski T, 2023, INTERNAT. ECONOM. REV., V0, P0
   Kilpatrick JA, 2007, J REAL ESTATE RES, V29, P303
   Levitt SD, 2001, J POLIT ECON, V109, P1198, DOI 10.1086/323281
   MCCARTHY PS, 1994, J URBAN ECON, V36, P353, DOI 10.1006/juec.1994.1040
   Merlin LA, 2020, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V134, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.020
   Michaels G, 2008, REV ECON STAT, V90, P683, DOI 10.1162/rest.90.4.683
   Morency P, 2012, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V102, P1112, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300528
   Nehiba C, 2018, ECON TRANSP, V14, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.ecotra.2017.12.001
   Parry IWH, 2007, J ECON LIT, V45, P373, DOI 10.1257/jel.45.2.373
   Parry IWH, 2004, J URBAN ECON, V56, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2004.04.004
   Pirdavani A, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V4, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2016.12.001
   Roll J, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V107, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103294
   Rose Mark, 2012, INTERSTATE HIGHWAY P, V0, P0
   Ruhm CJ, 1996, J HEALTH ECON, V15, P435, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00490-0
   Sanders RL, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V107, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103298
   Singer Jessie, 2022, THERE ARE NO ACCIDENTS: THE DEADLY RISE OF INJURY AND DISASTER- WHO PROFITS AND WHO PAYS THE PRICE, V0, P0
   Taylor KY, 2019, JUST POWER POLIT, V0, P1
   Tyndall J, 2021, ECON TRANSP, V26-27, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ecotra.2021.100219
   van Benthem A, 2015, J PUBLIC ECON, V124, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.001
   VICKREY W, 1968, LAW CONTEMP PROBL, V33, P464, DOI 10.2307/1190938
   Wang J, 2020, J SAFETY RES, V74, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.04.009
   White MJ, 2004, J LAW ECON, V47, P333, DOI 10.1086/422979
   Yu CY, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P136, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18807759
NR 47
TC 6
Z9 7
U1 3
U2 8
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0166-0462
EI 1879-2308
J9 REG SCI URBAN ECON
JI Reg. Sci. Urban Econ.
PD SEP 15
PY 2023
VL 102
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2023.103938
EA SEP 2023
PG 14
WC Economics; Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA T4QI8
UT WOS:001077847300001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Liu, L
   Wang, H
   Duan, JS
AF Liu, Lun
   Wang, Hui
   Duan, Jishan
TI How streetscape affects car use: Examining unexamined features of urban environment with fine-grained data
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Travel behavior; Built environment; Street view image; Deep learning; Beijing
ID residential self-selection; built environment; travel behavior; household travel; neighborhood; design; quality; walking; lead; city
AB The urban built environment has been extensively studied as a means to reduce car use, but most of the built environment features that have been examined mostly include so-called 'D-variables', namely, density, (func-tional) diversity, (road network) design, etc. The influence of the three-dimensional street space, which cannot be directly understood from maps, is much less studied. However, characteristics of the street space are considered to influence people's travel behavior according to urban design and walkability theories. A major reason for this gap is the lack of data providing relevant information. This paper aims to fill the gap by harnessing new urban data to measure these characteristics of the urban environment and analyze their impact on travel behavior, as indicated by the amount of car use. Among the many characteristics of street space, we chose the quality of street buildings, continuity of street walls, and height-width ratio of the street valley as three key characteristics to study. Using Beijing as a case study, we found that the three street space characteristics had a statistically sig-nificant relationship with residents' car use, mainly by influencing travel mode choice. The continuity of street walls is the most influential factor in reducing car use.
C1 [Liu, Lun] Peking Univ, Sch Govt, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Lun] Peking Univ, Inst Publ Governance, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Hui] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Duan, Jishan] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Architecture Planning & Preservat, New York, NY USA.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; Tsinghua University; Columbia University
RP Wang, H (通讯作者)，Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM wh-sa@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Social Science Fund of China; Tsinghua-Toyota Joint Research Institute Cross-discipline Program;  [52008005];  [19FGLB069]
CR Ameli SH, 2015, J URBAN DES, V20, P393, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1041894
   Unknown -, 1978, J TRANSPORTATION RES, V0, P0
   Batty M, 2013, URBAN MODELLING PROG, V0, P0
   Boutell MR, 2004, PATTERN RECOGN, V37, P1757, DOI 10.1016/j.patcog.2004.03.009
   Bowman J, 2005, ACTIVITY BASED TRAVE, V0, P1
   Brownson RC, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V36, PS99, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
   Cao X, 2007, TRANSPORTATION, V34, P535, DOI 10.1007/s11116-007-9132-x
   Cao XY, 2015, URBAN GEOGR, V36, P236, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2014.956420
   Certo ST, 2016, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V37, P2639, DOI 10.1002/smj.2475
   Cervero R, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P475, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976767
   Chatman DG, 2008, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V42, P1008, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2008.02.003
   County A, 2011, COLUMBIA PIKE SPECIA, V0, P0
   Doersch C, 2012, ACM T GRAPHIC, V31, P0, DOI 10.1145/2185520.2185597
   Dubey A, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9905, P196, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_12
   Economist T, 2016, ECONOMIST, V0, P0625
   Ewing R, 2013, METR PLANN DES, V0, PP1, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9
   Ewing Reid, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS223, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
   Ewing R, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P5, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15591585
   Ewing R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P2330, DOI 10.1177/0042098014560991
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Goel A, 2012, P 8 IND C COMP VIS G, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1145/2425333.2425334
   Guerra E, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P394, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14545170
   Hamidi S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11102720
   Handy S, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P55, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976724
   Handy S, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002
   Handy Susan, 1993, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, V1400, P58
   Hara Kotaro, 2013, P SIGCHI C HUMAN FAC, V0, PP631, DOI 10.1145/2470654.2470744
   HAYWARD SC, 1974, ENVIRON BEHAV, V6, P37
   HECKMAN JJ, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P153, DOI 10.2307/1912352
   Hwang J, 2014, AM SOCIOL REV, V79, P726, DOI 10.1177/0003122414535774
   Jacobs J, 1992, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Kamruzzaman M, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V33, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.004
   Kelly CM, 2013, ANN BEHAV MED, V45, PS108, DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9419-9
   Kockelman KM, 1997, TRANSPORTATION RES R, V1607, P116, DOI 10.3141/1607-16
   Koppelman FS, 2006, A SELF INSTRUCTING COURSE IN MODE CHOICE MODELLING: MULTINOMIAL AND NESTED LOGIT MODELS, V0, P0
   Krizek KJ, 2003, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V69, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944360308978019
   Krizhevsky Alex, 2012, P ADV NEURAL INFORM, V0, PP1097, DOI 10.1145/3065386
   Lee S, 2015, P IEEE INT C COMP PH, V0, P0
   Lin J, 2008, TRANSPORTATION, V35, P739, DOI 10.1007/s11116-008-9167-7
   Litman Todd, 2017, LAND USE IMPACTS ON TRANSPORT, V0, P0
   Liu L, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.06.003
   Lo RH, 2009, J URBANISM INT RES P, V2, P145, DOI 10.1080/17549170903092867
   Lynch Kevin, 1984, GOOD CITY FORM, V0, P0
   Marcus CC, 1997, PEOPLE PLACES DESIGN, V0, P0
   Microsft, 2020, BUILD FOOTPR AI ASS, V0, P0
   Moniruzzaman M, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P1323, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.09.013
   Moughtin C, 1992, URBAN DESIGN STREET, V3rd, P0
   Naik N, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P7571, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1619003114
   Nasar JL, 1998, EVALUATIVE IMAGE CIT, V0, P0
   Nasri A, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000226
   Nasri A, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP75, DOI 10.3141/2323-09
   National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2010, THE SIXTH NATIONAL POPULATION CENSUS, V0, P0
   Ordonez V, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8694, P494, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_32
   Park K, 2019, CITIES, V88, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.005
   Pohlen T, 2017, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP3309, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2017.353
   Purciel M, 2009, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V29, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.004
   Quercia Daniele, 2014, P 17 ACM C COMP SUPP, V0, PP945, DOI 10.1145/2531602.2531613
   Sabouri S, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103797
   Salesses P, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068400
   Salon D, 2015, RES TRANSP ECON, V52, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.008
   Santayana George, 1942, REALMS BEING, V0, P0
   Stevens MR, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P7, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044
   Susilo YO, 2012, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V17, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2011.11.007
   Systematics C, 2002, SAN FRANC TRAV DEM F, V0, P0
   Szegedy C, 2015, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594
   Wang DG, 2019, TRANSPORTATION, V46, P51, DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9783-1
   Wang DG, 2014, J TRANSP LAND USE, V7, P5, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.486
   Witten K, 2012, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V120, P971, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1104584
NR 70
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 7
U2 61
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JAN 15
PY 2023
VL 132
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104096
EA NOV 2022
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA 8B3QV
UT WOS:000916841800009
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Ki, D
   Park, K
   Chen, ZH
AF Ki, Donghwan
   Park, Keundeok
   Chen, Zhenhua
TI Bridging the gap between pedestrian and street views for human-centric environment measurement: A GIS-based 3D virtual environment
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE 3D City Model; Street View Image (SVI); Pedestrian Perspective; Measurement Error; Human Centric Measurement
ID city models; canyons; trees; sky
AB Street View Image (SVI) data has gained popularity as a methodological tool for assessing pedestrian-level environments across various disciplines. Several studies in transportation and public health fields posit that environmental features measured through SVIs are similar to those perceived by pedestrians, whereas, in fact, SVIs are typically collected from vehicles. As a result, the SVI data may reflect significant differences from an actual pedestrian's view. Hence, this study investigates the errors in measuring neighborhood environmental features resulting from the difference between pedestrian and vehicle views. To accomplish this goal, a threedimensional (3D) urban model is developed, utilizing multiple Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data. This model accurately represents the spatial positioning and dimensions of various entities. From the 3D model, virtual SVIs for each perspective are collected. Subsequently, we quantify environmental features in a manner similar to semantic segmentation for the images. Our findings reveal significant measurement errors for sidewalks, greenery, and roads between pedestrian and vehicle views. These errors are more pronounced with certain environment characteristics and parameter settings for image acquisition. For example, narrow road segments with few on-street parked vehicles exhibit increased measurement errors for greenery. Overall, the study provides guidelines for researchers on utilizing SVI to achieve reliable measurement of environmental features and move toward human-centric measurements.
C1 [Ki, Donghwan; Chen, Zhenhua] Ohio State Univ, Dept City & Reg Planning, Columbus, OH USA.
   [Park, Keundeok] NYU, Dept Civil & Urban Engn, New York, NY 10012 USA.
C3 University System of Ohio; Ohio State University; New York University
RP Park, K (通讯作者)，NYU, Dept Civil & Urban Engn, New York, NY 10012 USA.
EM ki.17@osu.edu; kp2393@nyu.edu; chen.7172@osu.edu
CR Aikoh T, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V80, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127845
   Anguelov D, 2010, COMPUTER, V43, P32, DOI 10.1109/MC.2010.170
   Arellana J, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P183, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
   Babahajiani P, 2017, MACH VISION APPL, V28, P679, DOI 10.1007/s00138-017-0845-3
   Badland HM, 2010, J URBAN HEALTH, V87, P1007, DOI 10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x
   Biljecki F, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V215, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104217
   Biljecki F, 2015, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V4, P2842, DOI 10.3390/ijgi4042842
   Chen L, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P121, DOI 10.1002/joc.2243
   Crooks A, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P773, DOI 10.1177/23998083221083364
   Fry D, 2020, J URBAN HEALTH, V97, P552, DOI 10.1007/s11524-019-00408-7
   Gong FY, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V134, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.042
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Harvey C, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V142, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.007
   Hipp JR, 2022, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V38, P537, DOI 10.1007/s10940-021-09506-9
   Hua JY, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103755
   Ito K, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V132, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103371
   Jiang F, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103645
   Kelly CE, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1500, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.001
   Ki D, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
   Kim JH, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101626
   Koo BW, 2022, ENVIRON BEHAV, V54, P211, DOI 10.1177/00139165211014609
   Law S, 2020, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V34, P681, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1555832
   Li XJ, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2039, DOI 10.1177/2399808320962511
   Li XJ, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V169, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.011
   Li XJ, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006
   Lu Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.029
   Lu Y, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V208, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.022
   Nesse K, 2020, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V146, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000560
   Over M, 2010, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V34, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.05.001
   Palliwal A, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V86, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101584
   Park YJ, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101655
   Purciel M, 2009, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V29, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.004
   Qi JD, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V228, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104585
   Ranzinger M, 1997, GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION 97: FROM RESEARCH TO APPLICATION THROUGH COOPERATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1109, DOI 10.1016/S0198-9715(97)10005-9
   Rundle AG, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V40, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.034
   Rzotkiewicz A, 2018, HEALTH PLACE, V52, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.001
   Schrotter G, 2020, PFG-J PHOTOGRAMM REM, V88, P99, DOI 10.1007/s41064-020-00092-2
   Seiferling I, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V165, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.010
   Torii Akihiko, 2009, 2009 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION WORKSHOPS, V0, P2188, DOI 10.1109/ICCVW.2009.5457551
   Wang MS, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V97, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101858
   White G, 2021, CITIES, V110, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103064
   Xiao JX, 2009, ACM T GRAPHIC, V28, P0, DOI 10.1145/1618452.1618460
   Ye Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.028
NR 43
TC 30
Z9 32
U1 8
U2 86
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD DEC 15
PY 2023
VL 240
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104873
EA SEP 2023
PG 13
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA T4TP4
UT WOS:001077931900001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Tzouras, PG
   Batista, M
   Kepaptsoglou, K
   Vlahogianni, EI
   Friedrich, B
AF Tzouras, Panagiotis G.
   Batista, Mariana
   Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos
   Vlahogianni, Eleni I.
   Friedrich, Bernhard
TI Can we all coexist? An empirical analysis of drivers' and pedestrians' behavior in four different shared space road environments
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Shared space; Coexistence; Urban road; Road users' behavior; Empirical analysis
ID street designs; perceptions; speed; evaluate; elements; schemes; safety; users
AB Shared space assumes that the elimination of physical segregation and traffic control measures forces road users to become more alert, move at lower speeds, and rely on the environmental context for negotiating movement. Still, pedestrians tend to feel reluctant about sharing the space with motorized traffic triggering a coexistence problem. By investigating trajectories, shared space is informally divided into three zones: circulation, safe, and activity zone. This study attempts to answer the following research questions: can all road users coexist in the same road space? If yes, under which circumstances, this can be achieved? Three German and one Greek case, presenting different design characteristics and traffic flow compositions, are empirically investigated. Relative variables, namely: pedestrian crossing rate, speed compliance rate and speed deviations, are considered. The findings indicate that vehicle speeds are reduced when the flow of both pedestrians and vehicles is above the mean. A high pedestrian crossing rate is related to higher speed deviations and consequently to heterogeneous driving behavior. By extending the activity or safe zones, the speed compliance rate is significantly reduced, while pedestrians cross more the circulation zone. By providing a wider circulation zone, average vehicle speeds exceed the speed limit.
C1 [Tzouras, Panagiotis G.; Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Rural Surveying & Geoinformat Engn, Iroon Politech 9, Zografos 15780, Attica, Greece.
   [Batista, Mariana; Friedrich, Bernhard] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Transportat & Urban Engn, Hermann Blenk Str 2, D-38108 Braunschweig, Germany.
   [Vlahogianni, Eleni I.] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Civil Engn, Iroon Politech 9, Zografos 15780, Attica, Greece.
C3 National Technical University of Athens; Braunschweig University of Technology; National Technical University of Athens
RP Tzouras, PG (通讯作者)，Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Rural Surveying & Geoinformat Engn, Iroon Politech 9, Zografos 15780, Attica, Greece.
EM ptzouras@mail.ntua.gr
CR Akgün-Tanbay N, 2022, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2022, P0, DOI 10.1155/2022/4979496
   Alsaleh R, 2022, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V18, P828, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2021.1898487
   Anvari B, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP43, DOI 10.3141/2588-05
   Balant M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12198143
   Batista M, 2022, TRANSPORTATION RES P, V60, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.007
   Batista M, 2022, J URBAN DES, V27, P528, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2022.2042228
   Berry WD, 1993, UNDERSTANDING REGRESSION ASSUMPTIONS, V0, P0
   Best H, 2015, THE SAGE HANDBOOK OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS AND CAUSAL INFERENCE, V0, P0
   Cheng H, 2021, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V12316, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-66888-4_2
   Clarke E, 2006, TRAFFIC ENG CONTROL, V47, P290
   Creutzig F, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P711, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2020.1762795
   Curl A, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V139, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.019
   Domenichini L, 2018, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V110, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.020
   Elvik R, 2001, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V33, P327, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00046-4
   García A, 2011, PROCD SOC BEHV, V16, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.449
   Gargoum SA, 2016, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V95, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.001
   Gerlach J, 2009, ROUTESROADS, V342, P36
   Hamilton-Baillie B, 2004, J URBAN TECHNOL, V11, P43, DOI 10.1080/1063073042000341970
   Hamilton-Baillie B, 2008, BUILT ENVIRONMENT 1978, V34, P161, DOI 10.2148/BENV.34.2.161
   Hammond V, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P78, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2012.739549
   Hayes AF, 2007, BEHAV RES METHODS, V39, P709, DOI 10.3758/BF03192961
   Imrie R, 2012, DISABIL REHABIL, V34, P873, DOI 10.3109/09638288.2011.624250
   Jaredson S, 2002, UTVARDERING SKVALLER, V0, P0
   Jayakody RRJC, 2018, INT J STRATEG PROP M, V22, P278, DOI 10.3846/ijspm.2018.3685
   Johora FT, 2018, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, V0, PP3568, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569687
   Kampitakis EP, 2023, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V150, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104104
   Kaparias I, 2021, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V80, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2021.05.007
   Kaparias I, 2020, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2674, P1084, DOI 10.1177/0361198120933627
   Kaparias I, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP17, DOI 10.3141/2586-03
   Kaparias I, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP21, DOI 10.3141/2393-03
   Kaparias I, 2012, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V15, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2012.02.001
   Karndacharuk A, 2014, TRANSPORT REV, V34, P190, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2014.893038
   Karndacharuk A, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP1, DOI 10.3141/2393-01
   Knoop VL, 2018, EUR J TRANSP INFRAST, V18, P145
   Methorst R, 2007, WALK21 OCT 1 3 TOR, V0, P1
   Moody S, 2014, P I CIVIL ENG-TRANSP, V167, P384, DOI 10.1680/tran.12.00047
   Peters P, 2019, APPL MOBILITIES, V4, P66, DOI 10.1080/23800127.2017.1386850
   Rudloff C, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP44, DOI 10.3141/2390-05
   Ruiz-Apilánez B, 2017, URBAN DES INT, V22, P267, DOI 10.1057/s41289-016-0036-2
   Schönauer R, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP114, DOI 10.3141/2316-13
   Siebert FW, 2022, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V91, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.003
   Stead D, 2019, CITIES, V92, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.020
   Trifunovic A, 2021, 100 ANN M TRANSPORTA, V0, P0
   Tsigdinos S, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V102, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103158
   Tzamourani E, 2023, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V17, P333, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2022.2037793
   Tzouras PG, 2022, 101 ANN M TRANSPORTA, V0, P0
   Tzouras PG, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V7, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100205
   Tzouras PG, 2021, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V184, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.085
   Vitale Brovarone E, 2021, CITIES, V108, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102996
   von Schönfeld KC, 2017, CITIES, V68, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.012
   Wang XS, 2018, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V113, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.032
   Woodman R, 2019, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V67, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.017
   Xia YL, 2020, PROG MOL BIOL TRANSL, V171, P309, DOI 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.04.003
   Yannis G, 2014, INT J INJ CONTROL SA, V21, P181, DOI 10.1080/17457300.2013.796387
   Zhang FN, 2018, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V96, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2018.09.009
   Zheng N, 2013, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V57, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.003
   Zoika S, 2021, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V9, P1084, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.009
NR 57
TC 16
Z9 19
U1 4
U2 13
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 141
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104477
EA JUL 2023
PG 15
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA N6CP2
UT WOS:001037872100001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Wolday, F
AF Wolday, Fitwi
TI The effect of neighbourhood and urban center structures on active travel in small cities
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Built environment; Travel attitude; City -centre structure; Facility distribution
ID residential self-selection; built environment; behavior; walking; accessibility; preferences; ownership; impacts; choice; focus
AB Densification is the key intervention strategy proposed in the urban sustainability planning literature. Nevertheless, the blueprint for action is still vague, and especially so in small cities. Is, for example, the premise for and reward of densification relatively transferable between city scales? In addition, does difference in centre structures and distribution of facilities in small cities have an implication for active travel? By focusing on three Norwegian small cities, this paper addresses how built environment and attitudes influence active travel behaviour in small cities with different centre structures. Using descriptive statistics, ANOVA test and negative binomial regression on survey data, the paper finds that attitude towards active travel as well as accessibility significantly influence walk/bike trip frequency. Moreover, variation in small-city centre structure has an important implication for active travel but the effect varies between facility types.
C1 [Wolday, Fitwi] Inst Transport Econ, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway.
C3 Institute of Transport Economics
RP Wolday, F (通讯作者)，Inst Transport Econ, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway.
EM Fitwi.wolday@toi.no
FU Norwegian Public Roads Administration;  [850040]
CR Aguilera A, 2004, URBAN PUBLIC EC REV, V1, P93
   Barnes R, 2013, ANN BEHAV MED, V45, PS86, DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9429-7
   Bhaskar R, 1975, REALIST THEORY SCI, V0, P0
   Bhat CR, 2007, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V41, P506, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2005.12.005
   Boarnet MarlonGary, 2001, TRAVEL BY DESIGN THE INFLUENCE OF URBAN FORM ON TRAVEL, V0, P0
   Cao XY, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP97, DOI 10.3141/2077-13
   Cao XY, 2015, URBAN GEOGR, V36, P236, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2014.956420
   Cao XY, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P487, DOI 10.1068/a4269
   Cao XY, 2009, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V43, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2009.02.001
   Cao XY, 2009, TRANSPORT REV, V29, P359, DOI 10.1080/01441640802539195
   Cavill N, 2019, ACTIVE TRAVEL PHYS A, V0, P0
   Christaller W, 1966, CENTRAL PLACES IN SOUTHERN GERMANY, V0, P0
   Christiansen P, 2011, BYSTRUKTUR TRANSPORT, V0, P0
   Crane R, 2012, OXFORD HDB URBAN EC, V0, P522
   DAGFINN AS, 1978, ACTA SOCIOL, V21, P125
   DALVI MQ, 1976, TRANSPORTATION, V5, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF00165245
   Ding C, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V110, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.009
   Ettema D, 2017, J TRANSP GEOGR, V59, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.01.009
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Filion P, 1999, URBAN STUD, V36, P1317, DOI 10.1080/0042098993015
   Handy S, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P55, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976724
   Handy S, 2010, HLTH EQUITABLE TRANS, V0, P0
   Handy SL, 2005, CRITICAL ASSESSMENT, V0, P0
   Handy S, 2015, HANDBOOK ON TRANSPORT AND DEVELOPMENT, V0, P198
   Handy SL, 2010, TRANSPORTATION, V37, P967, DOI 10.1007/s11116-010-9269-x
   HANSEN WG, 1959, J AM I PLANNERS, V25, P73, DOI 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Harris B, 2001, J TRANSPORTATION RES, V4, P15
   Hirst D, 2020, ACTIVE TRAVEL: TRENDS, V0, Policy and Funding
   Hjorthol R, 2014, NORWEGIAN TRAVEL SUR, V0, P0
   Hu H, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V59, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.013
   Kwan MP, 2008, APPL GEOGR, V28, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.002
   Kwan MP, 2012, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V102, P958, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.687349
   Lindelöw D, 2017, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V50, P520, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.021
   Marshall W, 2015, HANDBOOK ON TRANSPORT AND DEVELOPMENT, V0, P208
   Milakis D, 2015, J TRANSP LAND USE, V8, P59, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.557
   Millward H, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012
   Mokhtarian PL, 2008, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V42, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006
   Mokhtarian PL, 2001, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V35, P695, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00013-6
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Naess P, 2006, RTPI LIB SER, V0, P1
   Næss P, 2014, J TRANSP LAND USE, V7, P57, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.491
   Næss P, 2015, TRANSPORT REV, V35, P275, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2015.1017751
   Næss P, 2013, PROG PLANN, V79, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2012.05.001
   Næss P, 2009, TRANSPORT REV, V29, P293, DOI 10.1080/01441640802710812
   Naessa P, 2019, PROG PLANN, V128, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2017.10.002
   Nass POBJensen, 2004, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, V47, P35, DOI 10.1080/0964056042000189790
   Nielsen TAS, 2013, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V22, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2013.02.017
   Næss P, 2005, PROG PLANN, V63, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2004.08.003
   Nss P, 2012, J TRANSP LAND USE, V5, P21, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.314
   Ory DT, 2005, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V39, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.006
   Pucher J, 2010, BUILT ENVIRONMENT, V36, P391, DOI 10.2148/BENV.36.4.391
   Sallis J F, 2015, HEALTH BEHAVIOR: THEORY, V0, P0
   Schwanen T, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P759, DOI 10.1068/b3039
   Statistics Norway, 2015, STAT TABL 04859, V0, P0
   Stefansdottir H, 2014, FORMAKADEMISK-FORSKNINGSTIDSSKRIFT FOR DESIGN OG DESIGNDIDAKTIKK, V7, P0
   Sun BD, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V10, P638, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2015.1042175
   Sutcliffe M, 2020, FAMOUS 15 MINUTES SM, V0, P9
   Tennoy A, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V105, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103225
   Vilhelmson B, 1999, GEOJOURNAL, V48, P177, DOI 10.1023/A:1007075524340
   Wolday F, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V66, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.12.009
NR 60
TC 14
Z9 21
U1 1
U2 37
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JAN 15
PY 2023
VL 132
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104050
EA DEC 2022
PG 12
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA 6Y2YT
UT WOS:000896966300001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Sun, Y
   Lu, W
   Gu, ZC
AF Sun, Ye
   Lu, Wei
   Gu, Zongchao
TI Analysis of spatial form and structure of commercial pedestrian blocks based on Isovist and big data
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Isovist-APP; POI; heat map; commercial pedestrian district; spatial form and structure
ID space syntax; urban space; complexity; set
AB Commercial pedestrian blocks play an indispensable role in urban life. With the development of urban commercial intensification, the construction of commercial pedestrian blocks has ushered in a period of rapid development. To explore the spatial form and structural features of commercial pedestrian blocks, we examined the Qingniwa-Tianjin Street commercial pedestrian block in Dalian, China. We developed a new quantitative research method, using Isovist-App software simulation, big data statistics and Arc GIS analysis methods to explore the spatial morphological structure characteristics of commercial districts. The results show that Tianjin Street's pedestrian axis has low spatial permeability and monotonous browsing routes. This suggests that the outdoor pedestrian space design does not attract crowds to wander around and stroll. The overall centrality of the space was relatively high, and the spatial accessibility was good. The walking route provided a wide field of vision, stimulating people's desire for exploration. The space is highly guided, and people can visit according to the designed route. There is a big difference in the spatial aggregation and dispersion of POI facilities. Transportation, sports, and leisure facilities are the most evenly distributed, while shopping and life service street facilities vary considerably. During holidays, the intensity and duration of crowd activities are the largest, followed by working days and weekends. The people in the block mainly gather in the western and southern commercial complexes, and the attractiveness of outdoor pedestrian streets is lower than that of commercial complexes. Node space B has pedestrian streets with varying spatial interfaces and inconsistent visual appeal. The results can be used to support the spatial form and structural renewal design of commercial pedestrian blocks. The methods presented in this study provide a quantitative approach for the spatial analysis of other functional areas in the city.
C1 [Sun, Ye; Lu, Wei] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Arts, Dalian 116081, Peoples R China.
   [Gu, Zongchao] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Fine Art, Dept Architecture, Ganjingzi, Peoples R China.
C3 Dalian University of Technology; Dalian University of Technology
RP Lu, W (通讯作者)，Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Architecture & Arts, Dalian 116081, Peoples R China.
EM jianyisy2019@mail.dlut.edu.cn; luweieds@dlut.edu.cn; gzc991001@hotmail.com
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808094]
CR Babicki S, 2016, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V44, PW147, DOI 10.1093/nar/gkw419
   Batty M, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN B, V28, P123, DOI 10.1068/b2725
   BENEDIKT ML, 1979, ENVIRON PLANN B, V6, P47, DOI 10.1068/b060047
   BERLYNE DE, 1970, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V8, P279, DOI 10.3758/BF03212593
   Cai L, 2019, CITIES, V93, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.011
   Du YD, 2020, IOP C SERIES EARTH E, V470, P0
   Fisher-Gewirtzman D, 2013, SURV REV, V45, P451, DOI 10.1179/1752270613Y.0000000059
   Fisher-Gewirtzman D, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN B, V30, P37, DOI 10.1068/b12861
   Fominykh M, 2015, AMB INTELL SMART ENV, V19, P298, DOI 10.3233/978-1-61499-530-2-298
   FREEMAN LC, 1977, SOCIOMETRY, V40, P35, DOI 10.2307/3033543
   Gao S, 2017, T GIS, V21, P446, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12289
   GATRELL AC, 1985, PROG HUM GEOG, V9, P468, DOI 10.1177/030913338500900320
   Guo XM, 2022, J ASIAN ARCHIT BUILD, V21, P1779, DOI 10.1080/13467581.2021.1944872
   Hiller B, 1987, ARCHITECTURE BEHAV, V3, P233
   Hillier Bill, 1996, SPACE IS MACHINE CON, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(97)89854-7
   Hillier WRG, 2012, P 8 INT SPACE SYNTAX, V0, P0
   Jia P, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V50, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.02.009
   Kim G, 2019, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V74, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.009
   Lee D, 2015, J ASIAN ARCHIT BUILD, V14, P617, DOI 10.3130/jaabe.14.617
   Lonergan C, 2016, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V43, P87, DOI 10.1080/15230406.2015.1065761
   Long Y, 2016, NEW CONSTR, V1, P52
   Lyu G, 2016, J TRANSP GEOGR, V55, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.002
   Meng JQ, 2014, APPL MECH MATER, V505-506, P656, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.505-506.656
   Montgomery R, 1998, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V64, P269, DOI 10.1080/01944369808975984
   Ostwald MJ, 2020, NEXUS NETW J, V22, P211, DOI 10.1007/s00004-018-00422-3
   Portman ME, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V54, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.05.001
   Raman I, 2014, BEHAV RES METHODS, V46, P588, DOI 10.3758/s13428-013-0376-4
   ROSENBLATT M, 1956, ANN MATH STAT, V27, P832, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177728190
   Sha, 2018, CASE STUDY TAIZHOU 2, V0, PP4, DOI 10.1109/geoinformatics.2018.8557105
   Sharifi Noorian, 2020, DETECTING CLASSIFYIN, V0, P0
   Shaw SL, 2016, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V30, P1687, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2016.1164317
   Shen Y, 2016, CITIES, V55, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.013
   Simpson M, 2017, J SPAT INF SCI, V0, PP95, DOI 10.5311/JOSIS.2017.14.292
   TEKLENBURG JAF, 1993, ENVIRON PLANN B, V20, P347, DOI 10.1068/b200347
   Turner A, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN B, V28, P103, DOI 10.1068/b2684
   Tzortzi K, 2004, ARQ, V8, P128
   Varoudis T, 2014, 2 DIMENSIONS ARCHIT, V0, P91
   Weishan C, 2016, GEOGR. RES, V35, P703, DOI 10.11821/dlyj201604009
   Wu C, 2018, CITIES, V77, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.017
   [郑至键 Zheng Zhijian], 2020, 地理与地理信息科学 GEOGRAPHY AND GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE, V36, P48
NR 40
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 15
U2 118
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 5
BP 1313
EP 1327
DI 10.1177/23998083221138571
EA NOV 2022
PG 15
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA K6TA3
UT WOS:000879571600001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Hong, J
   McArthur, DP
   Lee, J
AF Hong, Jinhyun
   McArthur, David Philip
   Lee, Jihyeon
TI Neighbourhood deprivation, changes in walking attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic and walking demand in the post-pandemic period
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; Attitude; Walking; Neighbourhood deprivation; Built environment; Travel behaviour
ID residential self-selection; travel behavior; built environment; predicting walking; decision-making; active travel; bicycle; focus; infrastructure; demographics
AB Although the Coronavirus has had substantial negative impacts on our lives, the surge in walking activities during the pandemic provides an unprecedented opportunity for planners to transform cities to be healthier and more sustainable. The changes in walking behaviour could affect attitudes towards walking, which would influence walking demand in the post-pandemic period. This impact, however, might vary across neighbourhoods with different levels of deprivation due to their own characteristics. This potential inequity issue should be examined to make more resilient cities in the future where the risk of outbreaks is high. We conducted a survey (GlaMAS) and utilised statistical methods to examine the extent to which the attitudes towards walking changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and how its effect varies across neighbourhoods with different levels of deprivation. In addition, we investigated how the changes in attitudes are related to future walking demand. Our results show that residents in less deprived areas tend to have affirmative attitudes towards walking due to the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially leading to an inequity issue. In addition, attitudinal changes are significantly associated with the future walking demand, and it could result in health inequity between neighbourhoods in the future.
C1 [Hong, Jinhyun; Lee, Jihyeon] Univ Seoul, Dept Smart Cities, Seoul, South Korea.
   [McArthur, David Philip] Univ Glasgow, Dept Urban Studies, Glasgow, Scotland.
C3 University of Seoul; University of Glasgow
RP Hong, J (通讯作者)，Univ Seoul, Dept Smart Cities, Seoul, South Korea.
EM Jinhyun.Hong@uos.ac.kr; David.Mcarthur@glasgow.ac.uk; leej1hyeon@uos.ac.kr
FU Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) as ulcorner; Innovative Talent Education Program for Smart City lrcorner;; Economic and Social Research Council-funded Urban Big Data Centre at the University of Glasgow [ES/L011921/1]; Economic and Social Research Council [ES/S007105/1, ES/L011921/1] Funding Source: researchfish
CR Alfonzo M, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P29, DOI 10.1080/13574800701803456
   Unknown -, 2020, TRANSPORT USE DURING THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC, V0, P0
   Appleyard BS, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V6, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.002
   Bird EL, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V10, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.014
   Brainard J, 2019, PREV MED, V123, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.043
   Cao XY, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P431, DOI 10.1068/b32056
   Cao XY, 2009, TRANSPORT REV, V29, P359, DOI 10.1080/01441640802539195
   Choe EY, 2022, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-14780-8
   Curl A, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V10, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.06.004
   Dadashzadeh N, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191610065
   de Haas M, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V6, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150
   De Vos J, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P2011, DOI 10.1007/s11116-020-10119-7
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Falconer CL, 2017, BMJ OPEN, V7, P0, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017132
   Frank LD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V73, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103089
   Frank LD, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V12, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.11.008
   Glasgow Centre for Population Health, 2014, EVIDENCE FOR ACTION BRIEFING: ACCESS TO GREEN SPACE, V0, P0
   Haggar P, 2019, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V64, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.022
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Hankey S, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.005
   Heinen E, 2011, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V16, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010
   Hong J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12208672
   Hong J, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V11, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.09.003
   Hong J, 2014, TRANSPORTATION, V41, P1171, DOI 10.1007/s11116-014-9535-4
   Hong JH, 2014, TRANSPORTATION, V41, P419, DOI 10.1007/s11116-013-9462-9
   Hunter RF, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23937-9
   Joh K, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P219, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11427914
   Kroesen M, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V101, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.013
   Lee S, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V68, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.024
   Levi S, 2022, INT J QUAL STUD HEAL, V17, P0, DOI 10.1080/17482631.2022.2130508
   Li SJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102752
   Lin T, 2017, J TRANSP GEOGR, V65, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.004
   McCartney G, 2012, TRANSPORT POLICY, V21, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.003
   Megahed NA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350
   Mehta V, 2008, JOURNAL OF URBANISM: INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON PLACEMAKING AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, V1, P217, DOI 10.1080/17549170802529480
   Mokhtarian PL, 2008, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V42, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006
   National Statistics, 2021, SCOTTISH VACANT AND DERELICT LAND SURVEY 2021, V0, P0
   Olsen Jonathan R, 2017, PREV MED REP, V8, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.09.008
   Piatkowski DP, 2015, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V2, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2015.02.001
   Pooley CG, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1601, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.010
   Ralph KM, 2019, TRANSPORTATION, V46, P719, DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9842-7
   Rhodes RE, 2006, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P110, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.2.110
   Sarkar C, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.013
   Scottish Government, 2020, INTRO SCOTTISH INDEX, V0, P0
   Sepúlveda-Loyola W, 2020, J NUTR HEALTH AGING, V24, P938, DOI 10.1007/s12603-020-1500-7
   Shaer A, 2021, CITIES, V115, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103255
   Singleton PA, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP47, DOI 10.3141/2430-06
   Stavrinos D, 2020, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V144, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105686
   Ta N, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V99, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103022
   Thomas FMF, 2021, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V11, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100423
   Tsai WL, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103619
   van Wee B, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V80, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102540
   Wali B, 2021, HEALTH PLACE, V71, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102659
   Walsh D, 2008, HLTH WELLBEING GLASG, V0, P0
   Wang DG, 2019, TRANSPORTATION, V46, P51, DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9783-1
   Whyte B, 2022, ACTIVE TRAVEL STUDIES, V2, P0, DOI 10.16997/ats.1120
   Yang Y, 2017, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V31, P435, DOI 10.1177/0890117116669278
   Yu CY, 2016, PREV MED, V90, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.036
   Zhang N, 2021, CITIES, V112, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103139
NR 59
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 141
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104517
EA AUG 2023
PG 8
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA FU8E4
UT WOS:001148451700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Bayar, R
   Yilmaz, M
AF Bayar, Rumeysa
   Yilmaz, Merve
TI Measuring age-friendliness based on the walkability indices of older people to urban facilities
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Walkability; Age-friendly environment; The older people; Spatial index
ID physical-activity; metropolitan-area; walking behavior; green spaces; city; health; community; adults; accessibility; neighborhood
AB This study aims to measure age-friendliness based on the walkability indices of the older people to urban facilities in the sample area of Istanbul, Turkey and the various districts within. It focuses on three key urban facilities in age-friendly cities: open public spaces, health services and basic needs; Quantitative datasets are also utilised in order to measure the age-friendliness of the urban environment. There are two main quantitative dimensions of the study: to generate accessible areas to facilities and to identify age-friendly values within the identified accessibility areas. To measure age-friendliness, new index sets were created using the Age-Friendly Approach Index and the Weighted Age-Friendly Approach Index. The results underline that the most age-friendly areas of open spaces are in the districts: Fatih, Beyoglu and uskudar; the most age-friendly areas of health services are in Kadikoy, Sisli, Beyoglu, Fatih, Bayrampasa, Gungoren and Bahcelievler; the most age-friendly areas of basic needs are in Fatih, Kadikoy, Sisli and Gaziosmanpasa. Overall, Fatih, Kadikoy, Beyoglu and Sisli districts were found to have the widest age-friendly accessible areas, whilst districts moving towards the periphery of the city decrease in terms of age-friendliness. The least accessible areas are found in Beykoz, cekmekoy, Buyukcekmece and Silivri. The results allow us to discuss, compare and better understand age-friendliness and local government policies.
C1 [Bayar, Rumeysa; Yilmaz, Merve] Erzurum Tech Univ, Dept Architecture, Erzurum, Turkey.
C3 Erzurum Technical University
RP Bayar, R (通讯作者)，Erzurum Tech Univ, Dept Architecture, Erzurum, Turkey.
EM rumeysa.bayar@erzurum.edu.tr; yilmaz.merve@itu.edu.tr
CR Abbing HR, 2016, EUR J HEALTH LAW, V23, P435, DOI 10.1163/15718093-12341427
   Age Friendly Ireland, 2019, 10 YEARS DELIVERING, V0, P0
   Aguiar B, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V25, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.309
   Aiken LR, 1995, AGING: AN INTRODUCTION TO GERONTOLOGY, V0, P0
   Aktürk Z, 2015, EUR J GEN PRACT, V21, P238, DOI 10.3109/13814788.2015.1048681
   Alves F, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13094869
   Alves F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12187360
   Unknown -, 2018, WORLDS CITIES 2018 D, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2007, GLOBAL DATABASE OF AGE-FRIENDLY PRACTICES, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2021, ADRESE DAYALI NUFUS KAYIT VERILERI, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2016, COMM BEC MOR AG FRIE, V0, P0
   Arnberger A, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V21, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.012
   2021, 1900, DOI 10.5505/ITUJFA.2021.43410, V0, P0
   Beard J, 2012, GLOBAL POPULATION AG, V0, P0
   Biando VF, 2005, ISLAM PUBLIC SPACE U, V0, P0
   BM, 2019, COMM BEC MOR AG FRIE, V0, P0
   Breyer F, 2010, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V26, P674, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grq032
   Buffel T, 2016, CITIES, V55, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.016
   Buffel T, 2014, J AGING SOC POLICY, V26, P52, DOI 10.1080/08959420.2014.855043
   Buffel T, 2012, CRIT SOC POLICY, V32, P597, DOI 10.1177/0261018311430457
   Burton EJ, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-839
   CEYLAN Harun, 2015, ISTANBULDA YASLANMAK, V0, P35
   Chan GMY, 2016, INT PERSPECT AGING, V14, P121, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_8
   Colangeli JA, 2010, PLANNING AGE FRIENDL, V0, P0
   Coleman DA, 2006, WELFARE STATE READER, V2, P298
   Cornwell EY, 2009, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V50, P31, DOI 10.1177/002214650905000103
   Dellamora M, 2013, HOW AGE FRIENDLY IS THIS CITY? STRATEGIES FOR ASSESSING AGE-FRIENDLINESS, V0, P0
   Dickens AP, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647
   Dikken J, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186867
   Fan PL, 2018, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V33, P323, DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0602-z
   Ferrer S, 2015, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V33, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.014
   Finlay JM, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V208, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.010
   Garner IW, 2020, AGE AGEING, V49, P193, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afz146
   Garon S, 2014, J AGING SOC POLICY, V26, P73, DOI 10.1080/08959420.2014.854583
   Gehl Jan, 2011, LIFE BUILDINGS USING, V0, P0
   Gibney S, 2018, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V28, P0, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/cky213.110
   Gibney S, 2020, AGING MENT HEALTH, V24, P2022, DOI 10.1080/13607863.2019.1652246
   Glicksman A, 2014, J AGING SOC POLICY, V26, P131, DOI 10.1080/08959420.2014.854142
   Green G, 2013, J URBAN HEALTH, V90, PS116, DOI 10.1007/s11524-012-9765-8
   Greenfield EA, 2015, GERONTOLOGIST, V55, P191, DOI 10.1093/geront/gnv005
   Gutman G, 2007, GLOBAL HLTH GLOBAL A, V281, P0
   Horak J, 2022, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijgi11050279
   Hudakova A, 2011, INT J NURSING MIDWIF, V3, P81
   Humpel N, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V22, P188, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00426-3
   Hunter RH, 2011, J AGING SOC POLICY, V23, P354, DOI 10.1080/08959420.2011.605642
   ICOC, 2021, OCC NACE COD AFF IST, V0, P0
   IMM, 2015, LAND US MAP IST METR, V0, P0
   ISM, 2019, IST SAGL MUD ISM CAT, V0, P0
   Iwarsson S, 2003, DISABIL REHABIL, V25, P57, DOI 10.1080/0963828021000007969
   Julius LM, 2012, PHYS THER, V92, P1268, DOI 10.2522/ptj.20110326
   Jun HJ, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V62, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.014
   Kahn EB, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V22, P73, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00434-8
   Kalache A, 2002, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION WHO, V11, P7
   Kang HG, 2008, J BIOMECH, V41, P2899, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.002
   King AC, 2010, PUBLIC HEALTH REV, V32, P401, DOI 10.1007/BF03391609
   Koh PP, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V26, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.012
   Koohsari MJ, 2015, HEALTH PLACE, V33, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009
   Lager DR, 2015, PERSPECTIVES ON AGEING IN PLACE: OLDER ADULTS EXPERIENCES OF EVERYDAY LIFE IN URBAN NEIGHBOURHOODS, V0, P0
   Landorf C, 2008, LOCAL ENVIRON, V13, P497, DOI 10.1080/13549830802259896
   Lee S, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P368, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
   Leslie E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
   Leyden KM, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1546, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
   MANC (Meteorology Authority of Northern Cyprus), 2016, AD BEL AB, V0, P0
   Menec VH, 2011, CAN J AGING, V30, P479, DOI 10.1017/S0714980811000237
   Metz DH, 2000, TRANSPORT POLICY, V7, P149, DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00004-4
   Millward H, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012
   Moulaert T, 2016, INT PERSPECT AGING, V14, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2
   Mullen N, 2022, J APPL GERONTOL, V41, P1274, DOI 10.1177/07334648211065431
   Neal MB, 2014, J AGING SOC POLICY, V26, P88, DOI 10.1080/08959420.2014.854651
   Neal MB, 2009, GENERATIONS, V33, P74
   OSM, 2021, OP STREET MAPS, V0, P0
   Ostroff E, 2001, UNIVERSAL DESIGN HDB, V0, P1.3
   Özer Z, 2023, ARCH ENVIRON OCCUP H, V78, P38, DOI 10.1080/19338244.2022.2061397
   Padeiro M, 2018, RES SOC ADMIN PHARM, V14, P653, DOI 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.07.014
   Phillipson C, 2012, HOUSING LIN, V37, P1
   Pittsb ATER, 2020, AGE FRIENDLY GREATER, V0, P0
   Plouffe L, 2010, J URBAN HEALTH, V87, P733, DOI 10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0
   Porta S, 2005, URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, V10, P51, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000136
   Ramirez LKB, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V31, P515, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.026
   Rantakokko M, 2013, EXERC SPORT SCI REV, V41, P19, DOI 10.1097/JES.0b013e3182556f1e
   Ruza J, 2012, AM SOC CIVIL ENG, V0, P196
   Saelens BE, 2003, ANN BEHAV MED, V25, P80, DOI 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   Schehl B, 2020, EUR J AGEING, V17, P291, DOI 10.1007/s10433-020-00553-y
   Senturk M, 2015, ISTANBULDA YASLANMAK: ISTANBULDA YASLILARIN MEVCUT DURUMU ARASTIRMASI, V0, P0
   Somenahalli S, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V104, P942, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.189
   Sparkes SP, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0210563
   Steels S, 2015, CITIES, V47, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.004
   Stucki G, 2007, J REHABIL MED, V39, P279, DOI 10.2340/16501977-0041
   Sugiyama T, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN A, V39, P1943, DOI 10.1068/a38226
   Sundquist K, 2011, SOC SCI MED, V72, P1266, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.004
   Todd A, 2015, BMJ OPEN, V5, P0, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007328
   United Nations, 2017, DEP EC SOC AFF PROGR, V0, P0
   Van Dijk HM, 2015, AGEING SOC, V35, P1771, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X14000622
   van Hoof J, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V199, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922
   Warth L, 2016, INT PERSPECT AGING, V14, P37, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_3
   Webb EA, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V5, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2017.02.009
   Wen C, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V38, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.023
   Woolrych R, 2017, SCOTTISH PLANNER, V169, P10
   World Health Organization, 2018, GLOBAL GUIDELINES FOR THE PREVENTION OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION, V0, P0
   Yung EHK, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V59, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.022
   Zaidi A, 2017, J EUR SOC POLICY, V27, P138, DOI 10.1177/0958928716676550
   Zhang Y, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P1076, DOI 10.3390/su6021076
NR 105
TC 20
Z9 24
U1 14
U2 130
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD MAR 15
PY 2023
VL 28
IS 1
BP 35
EP 51
DI 10.1057/s41289-022-00194-w
EA JUL 2022
PG 17
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA C3IU2
UT WOS:000825192100002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Jeon, J
   Woo, A
AF Jeon, Junehyung
   Woo, Ayoung
TI Deep learning analysis of street panorama images to evaluate the streetscape walkability of neighborhoods for subsidized families in Seoul, Korea
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Public housing; Visual walkability; Spatial equity; Semantic segmentation
ID built environment; physical-activity; residential density; visual enclosure; mental-health; urban design; walking; travel; view; transportation
AB Many studies have examined the relationship between the location of subsidized housing and a variety of socioeconomic opportunities in the surrounding neighborhoods. However, there has been little research on whether public housing promotes the subsidized population's access to walkable neighborhoods. This study fills the gap in prior literature by examining spatial patterns of public housing as classified by program attributes and the neighborhood- and eye-level environmental characteristics of the surrounding neighborhoods. In particular, this research estimated visual walkability at pedestrian eye-level using semantic segmentation techniques built on a deep learning network and Google Street View datasets. Based on these estimations, we employed binary logistic regression models to determine whether neighborhoods with public housing ensure favorable walkable environments for subsidized families in Seoul, Korea. Our findings showed that walkability differed between long-term and short-term housing. Long-term public housing was primarily located in areas with low 4-or-more leg intersection density and street pavement but a high density of crosswalks. Conversely, short-term public housing tended to be located in neighborhoods with poor greenery and openness, and having lower street intersection and crosswalk densities. These results may provide insight for housing developers and planners regarding the uneven spatial distribution of public housing and help better retrofit neighborhood walkability for subsidized families.
C1 [Jeon, Junehyung; Woo, Ayoung] Hanyang Univ, Grad Sch Urban Studies, Seoul, South Korea.
C3 Hanyang University
RP Woo, A (通讯作者)，Hanyang Univ, Grad Sch Urban Studies, Seoul, South Korea.
EM ayoungwoo@hanyang.ac.kr
FU National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT) [NRF-2020R1F1A1076872]
CR Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Bhattacharyya DB, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V96, P2737, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.307
   Biernacka M, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V73, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127585
   Carr JamesH, 2008, SEGREGATION: THE RISING COSTS FOR AMERICA, V0, P0
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Chaudhury H, 2012, J AGING STUD, V26, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jaging.2011.07.001
   Cheng L, 2017, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V6, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6090265
   Cullen Gordon, 1961, TOWNSCAPE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780080502816
   DOrso G, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V82, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102555
   Dadvand P, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V91, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029
   Durant S, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0228345
   Ellen IG, 2012, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V22, P551, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2012.697913
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Ewing R, 2009, J PLAN LIT, V23, P347, DOI 10.1177/0885412209335553
   Forsyth A, 2007, URBAN STUD, V44, P679, DOI 10.1080/00420980601184729
   Frank L, 1994, TRANSPN RES REC, V1466, P44
   Frank LD, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P75, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976725
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   GALSTER GC, 1995, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V6, P7, DOI 10.1080/10511482.1995.9521180
   Gauvin L, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.029
   Gehl Jan, 1987, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: USING PUBLIC SPACE, V0, P0
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Ji K-H, 2014, LHI J LAND HOUSING U, V5, P247
   Ki D, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
   Kim Hyeoncheol, 2017, JOURNAL OF KOREA PLANNING ASSOCIATION, V0, P0
   Kim SH, 2014, CITY, V0, P0
   Koo BW, 2022, ENVIRON BEHAV, V54, P211, DOI 10.1177/00139165211014609
   Koschinsky J, 2009, J URBAN AFF, V31, P319, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00462.x
   Lee C, 2013, J COMMUN HEALTH, V38, P12, DOI 10.1007/s10900-012-9592-6
   이형숙, 2011, JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN INSTITUTE OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 한국조경학회지, V39, P65
   Leslie E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
   Li XJ, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006
   Lotfata A, 2022, PALGRAVE ENCY URBAN, V0, P0
   Lu Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.029
   Massey DS, 2004, DU BOIS REVIEW: SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ON RACE, V1, P7, DOI 10.1017/S1742058X04040032
   McCormack GR, 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-125
   Neckerman KM, 2009, J PUBLIC HEALTH POL, V30, PS264, DOI 10.1057/jphp.2008.47
   Newman SJ, 1997, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V8, P703, DOI 10.1080/10511482.1997.9521275
   Oakley D, 2008, URBAN AFF REV, V43, P599, DOI 10.1177/1078087407309432
   Olszewski P, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1927, P38, DOI 10.3141/1927-05
   Purciel M, 2009, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V29, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.004
   Qiu WS, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V221, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104358
   Rohe WM, 2001, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V67, P279, DOI 10.1080/01944360108976236
   Ronald R, 2015, HOUSING STUD, V30, P413, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2014.970142
   Saelens BE, 2003, ANN BEHAV MED, V25, P80, DOI 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   Seoul Metropolitan Government, 2019, RES POP STAT SEOUL, V0, P0
   Squires GD, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P47, DOI 10.1080/0042098042000309694
   Statistics Korea, 2021, HOUS TYP ADM DISTR, V0, P0
   SUHUN PARK, 2021, JOURNAL OF KOREA PLANNING ASSOCIATION, V0, P0
   Talen E, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P67, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.935232
   Tang JX, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.015
   Un Seon Ki, 2018, JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN URBAN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, V0, P0
   Van Dyck D, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P971, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.04.001
   Van Zandt S, 2009, URBAN GEOGR, V30, P490, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.30.5.490
   Walk Score Professional, 2022, WALK SCOR DAT SERV, V0, P0
   Wang JD, 2021, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V43, P3349, DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2983686
   Wang RY, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.009
   Wang WL, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V44, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.009
   Won J, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V203, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103882
   Woo A, 2021, CITIES, V109, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103019
   Woo A, 2019, CITIES, V89, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.002
   Woo A, 2017, APPL GEOGR, V83, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.014
   Woo Ayoung, 2014, SITING OF SUBSIDIZED HOUSING IN NEIGHBORHOODS: ASSESSING ECONOMIC, V0, P0
   Ye Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.028
   Yin L, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V76, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.024
   Zhou BL, 2019, INT J COMPUT VISION, V127, P302, DOI 10.1007/s11263-018-1140-0
   Zhou H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101605
   Zhou J, 2022, 2022 IEEE INT VEH S, V0, P0
   Zhu XM, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V34, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.024
NR 71
TC 36
Z9 42
U1 10
U2 105
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD FEB 15
PY 2023
VL 230
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104631
EA NOV 2022
PG 13
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA L8QF9
UT WOS:001025849000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Tao, T
   Wu, XY
   Cao, J
   Fan, YL
   Das, K
   Ramaswami, A
AF Tao, Tao
   Wu, Xinyi
   Cao, Jason
   Fan, Yingling
   Das, Kirti
   Ramaswami, Anu
TI Exploring the Nonlinear Relationship between the Built Environment and Active Travel in the Twin Cities
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE machine learning; travel behavior; land use; walking; community design
ID residential self-selection; boosting decision trees; physical-activity; land-use; urban design; walking; neighborhood; transport; parks; scale
AB Active travel is important to public health and the environment. Previous studies substantiate built environment influences active travel, but they seldom assess its overall contribution. Most of the studies assume that built environment characteristics have linear associations with active travel. This study uses Gradient Boosting Decision Trees to explore nonlinear relationships between the built environment and active travel in the Twin Cities. Collectively, the built environment has more predictive power for active travel than demographics, and parks, proximity to downtown, and transit access have important influences. The threshold effects of built environment variables help inform planning practice.
C1 [Tao, Tao; Wu, Xinyi; Cao, Jason; Fan, Yingling; Das, Kirti] Univ Minnesota, Humphrey Sch Publ Affairs, 301 19th Ave South, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
   [Ramaswami, Anu] Princeton Univ, MS Chadha Ctr Global India, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
C3 University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities; Princeton University
RP Cao, J (通讯作者)，Univ Minnesota, Humphrey Sch Publ Affairs, 301 19th Ave South, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
EM cao@umn.edu
FU Sustainable Research Network project of the National Science Foundation of USA: Integrated Urban Infrastructure Solutions for Environmentally Sustainable, Healthy and Livable Cities [1444745]
CR Ainsworth BE, 2011, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V43, P1575, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12
   Unknown -, 2009, NUTR REV, V67, P114, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00136.x
   Unknown -, 2019, PACKAGE GBM, V0, P0
   Baker DM, 2019, J PLAN EDUC RES, V39, P35, DOI 10.1177/0739456X17713619
   Beenackers MA, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V42, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.021
   Boarnet MG, 2008, J PLAN EDUC RES, V27, P341, DOI 10.1177/0739456X07311073
   Breiman L, 1984, CLASSI CATION AND REGRESSION TREES, V0, P0
   Brownson RC, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V36, PS99, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
   CAO X, 2015, URBAN GEOGR, V36, P0
   Cervero R, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1478, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
   Cervero R, 2002, J PLAN EDUC RES, V22, P50, DOI 10.1177/0739456X0202200105
   Cervero R, 2004, TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: EXPERIENCES, V0, P0
   Cohen DA, 2007, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V97, P509, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447
   Cohen DA, 2010, PREV MED, V50, PS9, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.020
   Ding C, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V77, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.04.011
   Ding C, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V118, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.041
   Ding C, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V110, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.009
   Duncan MJ, 2010, J URBAN HEALTH, V87, P782, DOI 10.1007/s11524-010-9488-7
   Elith J, 2008, J ANIM ECOL, V77, P802, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Ewing R, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P19, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1245112
   Fan Y, 2015, SMARTRAC: A SMARTPHONE SOLUTION FOR CONTEXT-AWARE TRAVEL AND ACTIVITY CAPTURING, V0, P0
   FAN Y, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P0
   Frank L, 1994, TRANSPN RES REC, V1466, P44
   Friedman JH, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1189, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msy096
   Friedman JH, 2002, COMPUT STAT DATA AN, V38, P367, DOI 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2
   Giles-Corti B, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V77, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.016
   Guan XD, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P267, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1692965
   Guo Z, 2013, J PLAN EDUC RES, V33, P34, DOI 10.1177/0739456X12459360
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Heesch KC, 2015, HEALTH PLACE, V36, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.004
   Isikhan SY, 2016, COMPUT MATH METHOD M, V2016, P0, DOI 10.1155/2016/6794916
   Kitamura R, 1997, TRANSPORTATION, V24, P125, DOI 10.1023/A:1017959825565
   Litman T, 2003, ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION POLICY ISSUES, V0, P0
   Mokhtarian PL, 2008, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V42, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006
   NAESS P, 2019, J PLANNING ED RES, V0, P0
   Neves A, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V123, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.022
   Oliver LN, 2007, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V6, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-6-41
   Pushkarev B, 1975, TRANSPORT RES REC, V538, P1
   Ridgeway G, 2007, UPDATE, V1, P0, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9752.1996.TB00390.X
   Rodríguez DA, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P43, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976723
   Sallis JF, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V36, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.031
   Schoner J, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP67, DOI 10.3141/2464-09
   Singh AC, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V63, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.004
   Stead D, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN B, V28, P499, DOI 10.1068/b2677
   Stevens MR, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P7, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044
   Strath SJ, 2013, CIRCULATION, V128, P2259, DOI 10.1161/01.cir.0000435708.67487.da
   *TRANSP RES BOARD, 2005, 282 TRANSP RES BOARD, V282, P0
   United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2015, GLOB PUBL SPAC TOOLK, V0, P0
   van Wee B, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V10, P18, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2013.820998
   van Wijk DC, 2017, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V16, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-017-0083-y
   Wu XY, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V75, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.018
   Yang PY, 2010, CURR BIOINFORM, V5, P296, DOI 10.2174/157489310794072508
   Zhang L, 2012, J TRANSP LAND USE, V5, P40, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v5i3.266
   Zhang M, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P344, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976383
NR 55
TC 135
Z9 142
U1 16
U2 85
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0739-456X
EI 1552-6577
J9 J PLAN EDUC RES
JI J. Plan. Educ. Res.
PD SEP 15
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 3
BP 637
EP 652
DI 10.1177/0739456X20915765
EA MAY 2020
PG 16
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA O7XB8
UT WOS:000536619000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Alawadi, K
   Alameri, H
   Scoppa, M
AF Alawadi, Khaled
   Alameri, Hind
   Scoppa, Martin
TI Reclaiming Alleyways to Improve Network Connectivity: Lessons from Dubai's Neighborhoods
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE alleyways; connectivity; Dubai; pedestrian route directness; urban network analysis
ID urban form; physical-activity; streets; design; centrality; landscape; walking
AB This study highlights the necessity of studying both streets and alleyways when assessing network connectivity efficiency. Taking Dubai as a case, the research evaluates eleven neighborhoods with different streets and alleyways systems designed during different growth periods. The focus is placed on the efficiency of different street layouts and explores the contribution of alleys to that efficiency. A Pedestrian Route Directness (PRD) test is used to assess the efficiency of neighborhoods streets and alleys system. Findings show that alleys improved connectivity once added to the network showing an improvement in average PRD values, network densities, and plots passing the test.
C1 [Alawadi, Khaled] Khalifa Univ, Sustainable Urbanism, MSc Sustainable Crit Infrastruct Program, Masdar Campus, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates.
   [Alameri, Hind] Khalifa Univ, Sustainable Crit Infrastruct, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates.
   [Scoppa, Martin] Khalifa Univ, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates.
C3 Khalifa University of Science & Technology; Khalifa University of Science & Technology; Khalifa University of Science & Technology
RP Alawadi, K (通讯作者)，Khalifa Univ, Sustainable Crit Infrastruct Program, Masdar Campus,POB 127788, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates.
EM Khaled.alawadi@ku.ac.ae
FU Khalifa University [8474000184]
CR Alawadi K, 2019, J HOUS BUILT ENVIRON, V34, P235, DOI 10.1007/s10901-018-9622-5
   Alawadi K, 2018, CITIES, V81, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.001
   Alawadi K, 2019, J PLAN EDUC RES, V39, P18, DOI 10.1177/0739456X17720490
   Alawadi K, 2018, INT J MIDDLE E STUD, V50, P562, DOI 10.1017/S0020743818000557
   Alawadi K, 2016, JOURNAL OF URBANISM INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON PLACEMAKING AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, V9, P276, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2015.1045924
   Alawadi K, 2017, CITIES, V60, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.012
   Unknown -, 1998, URBAN DESIGN Q, V0, P0
   Batty Michael, 2004, DISTANCE IN SPACE SYNTAX, V0, P0
   Beasley E, 2006, THE ALLEYS AND BACK BUILDINGS OF GALVESTON: AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SOCIAL HISTORY, V0, P0
   Bianca S, 2000, URBAN FORM ARAB WORL, VFirst, P0
   City of Austin Downtown Commission Alley Activation Workgroup, 2013, ACT AUST DOWNT ALL P, V0, P0
   Crucitti P, 2006, PHYS REV E, V73, P0, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.036125
   Curran RaymondJ, 1983, ARCHITECTURE URBAN E, V0, P0
   Dill J, 2004, 83RD ANNUAL MEETING OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V0, P11
   Duany Andres, 2001, SUBURBAN NATION RISE, V0, P0
   Ellis G, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P130, DOI 10.1177/0265813515610672
   Elsheshtawy Y, 2009, DUBAI URBAN SPECTACL, V0, P0
   Ford LR, 2001, URBAN GEOGR, V22, P268, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.22.3.268
   FREEMAN LC, 1991, SOC NETWORKS, V13, P141, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(91)90017-N
   Furlan R, 2017, JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY & ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENCES, V1, P0, DOI 10.15406/jhaas.2017.01.00004
   Hage SaraA, 2008, ALLEYS NEGOTIATING I, V0, P0
   Handy S, 2003, APA PLANNING ADVISOR, V0, P1
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Hess P, 1999, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1674, P9, DOI 10.3141/1674-02
   Hess PM, 1997, PLACES-FORUM ENVIRON, V11, P58
   Hidenobu Jinnai, 1995, TOKYO SPATIAL ANTHR, V0, P0
   HILLIER B, 1993, ENVIRON PLANN B, V20, P29, DOI 10.1068/b200029
   Hillier Bill, 1988, THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF SPACE, V0, P0
   Imai H, 2018, ROUT RES PLAN URB, V0, P0
   Imai H, 2013, CITIES, V34, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.01.008
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Kang CD, 2017, CITIES, V71, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.005
   Kiet Anthony, 2011, FOCUS, V8, P0, DOI 10.15368/FOCUS.2011V8N1.4
   Mahy Margaret, 1987, NEW THEORY URBAN DES, V6, P0
   Marshall WE, 2012, J TRANSP LAND USE, V5, P5, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.301
   Michel Debra Lynn, 2010, THESIS, V0, P0
   Pafka Elek, 2018, ENV PLANNING B, V47, P0
   Park K, 2019, CITIES, V88, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.005
   Peponis J, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P881, DOI 10.1068/b33088
   Porta L, 2007, URBAN SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN: APPROACHES TO TIME-PEOPLE-PLACE RESPONSIVE URBAN SPACES, V0, P101
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Porta S, 2006, PHYSICA A, V369, P853, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.063
   Porta S, 2008, URBAN DES INT, V13, P41, DOI 10.1057/udi.2008.1
   Ramos Stephen J, 2012, DUBAI AMPLIFIED ENG, V0, P0
   Randall TA, 2001, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V127, P1, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2001)127:1(1)
   Ratti C, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P487, DOI 10.1068/b3019
   Saleh MAE, 1998, HABITAT INT, V22, P537, DOI 10.1016/S0197-3975(98)00015-0
   Saleh MAE, 1998, HABITAT INT, V22, P571, DOI 10.1016/S0197-3975(98)00020-4
   Scoppa M, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V130, P770, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.063
   Scoppa M, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V38, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.004
   SENNETT Richard, 1992, USES DISORDER PERSON, V0, P0
   Sevtsuk A, 2012, P 2012 S SIMULATION, V0, PP1, DOI 10.5555/2339453.2339471
   Sevtsuk A, 2010, THESIS MIT, V0, P0
   Sharifi A, 2013, HABITAT INT, V38, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.007
   Shen Yantai, 1997, JING CHENG HU TONG L, V0, P0
   Siksna D, 1997, URBAN MORPHOLOGY, V1, P19, DOI 10.51347/JUM.V1I1.4048
   Stangl P, 2012, URBAN DES INT, V17, P228, DOI 10.1057/udi.2012.14
   Stangl P, 2011, URBAN DES INT, V16, P285, DOI 10.1057/udi.2011.14
   Wang FH, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.004
   Wheeler SM, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P167, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1081567
   Wolch J, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P2874, DOI 10.1068/a42259
   Zelinka Al, 2003, PLANNING, V69, P25
NR 62
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 0
U2 13
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0739-456X
EI 1552-6577
J9 J PLAN EDUC RES
JI J. Plan. Educ. Res.
PD DEC 15
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 4
BP 917
EP 939
DI 10.1177/0739456X20931907
EA JUN 2020
PG 23
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA Y2TK9
UT WOS:000542322700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Angel, A
   Cohen, A
   Dalyot, S
   Plaut, P
AF Angel, Avital
   Cohen, Achituv
   Dalyot, Sagi
   Plaut, Pnina
TI Impact of COVID-19 policies on pedestrian traffic and walking patterns
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19 policy; pedestrian traffic; walking patterns; crowdsourced big data; Bluetooth sensor network
ID built environment; physical-activity; behavior; travel
AB The spread of COVID-19 pandemic provoked new policies and restrictions, which had an unprecedented impact on urban mobility and traffic on local and global scales. While changes in motorized traffic were investigated and monitored throughout the recent pandemic crisis in many cities around the world, not much was done on the changes in pedestrian street-traffic and walking patterns during this time. This study aims to identify, quantify, and analyze the changes in pedestrian traffic and walking patterns induced by COVID-19 policies. The "first wave" period of COVID-19 policies in Tel-Aviv, Israel, is used as a case study in this work. The analysis includes over 116 million pedestrian movement records documented by a network of 65 Bluetooth sensors, between 1.2.2020 and 26.7.2020, with a comparison to the equivalent time in 2019 that signifies "normal" pre-COVID-19 conditions. The results show clear correlation between the various COVID-19 policy restrictions and pedestrian count. The shifts to work-from-home and closure of businesses were highly correlated with changes in walking patterns during weekdays, while distinguishing changes in commercial and residential street segments. Nevertheless, while the restrictions dramatically influenced pedestrian movement volume and time of walking, it did not significantly change where people chose to walk, signifying the essentialness of attractive streets, parks and squares for citizens living in urban areas. This study shows how policy affects walking behavior in cities, demonstrating the potential of passive crowdsourced sensing technologies to provide urban planners and decision makers an efficient tool for monitoring and evaluating pedestrian infrastructure implementation in cities.
C1 [Angel, Avital; Plaut, Pnina] Technion, Israel Inst Technol, Fac Architecture & Town Planning, Haifa, Israel.
   [Cohen, Achituv; Dalyot, Sagi] Technion, Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Haifa, Israel.
C3 Technion Israel Institute of Technology; Technion Israel Institute of Technology
RP Angel, A (通讯作者)，Technion, Israel Inst Technol, Fac Architecture & Town Planning, Urban & Reg Planning Dept, Haifa, Israel.
EM avitalsch@campus.technion.ac.il
FU Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center [2029717]
CR Acs P, 2020, HEALTH PROBL CIVILIZ, V14, P174, DOI 10.5114/hpc.2020.98472
   Alomari MA, 2020, RISK MANAG HEALTHC P, V13, P1757, DOI 10.2147/RMHP.S268320
   Askarizad R, 2021, CITIES, V119, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103388
   Beck MJ, 2020, TRANSPORT POLICY, V96, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.07.001
   Bian ZL, 2021, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V145, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.019
   Bongiorno C, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V80, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102501
   Bucsky P, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V8, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100141
   Dahlberg M, 2020, EFFECTS OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON POPULATION MOBILITY UNDER MILD POLICIES: CAUSAL EVIDENCE FROM SWEDEN, V0, P0
   de Haas M, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V6, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150
   Dunton GF, 2020, PREV MED REP, V20, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101241
   Falchetta G, 2020, ENERGY FORUM, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1
   Fan WY, 2016, SCIENCE JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, V4, P181, DOI 10.11648/j.sjbm.20160405.16
   Ferrer S, 2018, TRANSPORT POLICY, V67, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.009
   Fitzpatrick K, 2007, ITE J, V77, P34
   Gov D, 2020, MONTHLY DATA LOCAL R, V0, P0
   Hong JY, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V186, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107327
   Hunter RF, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23937-9
   Jenelius E, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V8, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100242
   Jiang B, 2009, PHYS REV E, V80, P0, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.021136
   Kim S, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V123, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.003
   Kubácek L, 2012, APPL MATH-CZECH, V57, P655, DOI 10.1007/s10492-012-0040-9
   Kurkcu A, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP72, DOI 10.3141/2644-09
   Lee JM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12197863
   Lesani A, 2019, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V20, P1484, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2018.2854895
   Li S, 2014, RES APPL URBAN FUNCT, V0, P0
   Malinovskiy Y, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP137, DOI 10.3141/2299-15
   Malleson N, 2018, T GIS, V22, P616, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12336
   Mercader P, 2019, 7 S EUR ASS RES TRAN, V0, P1
   Miranda AS, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V86, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101563
   Mitra R, 2015, J AGING STUD, V35, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.07.002
   Municipality TAY, 2019, TEL AVIV YAFO STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, V0, P0
   Parady G, 2020, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, V7, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100181
   Pinna F, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10114084
   Reznik A, 2019, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V13, P235, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2018.1459971
   Shakibaei S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102619
   Shamshiripour A, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V7, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216
   Sharmin S, 2018, TRANSPORT REV, V38, P524, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2017.1365101
   Stockwell S, 2021, BMJ OPEN SPORT EXERC, V7, P0, DOI 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000960
   Yabe T, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-75033-5
   Zhang LJ, 2011, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V38-4, P87
   Zhao JX, 2019, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V100, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.007
   Zheng YN, 2016, TRANSP RES PROC, V15, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.012
NR 42
TC 27
Z9 28
U1 1
U2 35
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 5
BP 1178
EP 1193
DI 10.1177/23998083221113332
EA JUL 2022
PG 16
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA K6TA3
UT WOS:000823186600001
PM 38603178
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Wang, RH
   Lu, TS
   Wan, CW
   Sun, XK
   Jiang, WX
AF Wang, Ronghua
   Lu, Tianshu
   Wan, Chuanwei
   Sun, Xinkun
   Jiang, Wuxian
TI Measuring the Effects of Streetscape Characteristics on Perceived Safety and Aesthetic Appreciation of Pedestrians
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Streetscape characteristics; Perceived safety; Aesthetic appreciation
ID urban green spaces; human health; perceptions; landscape; crime; fear; environment; experience; preference; design
AB Streets provide necessary infrastructure in cities, but urban residents rarely have the opportunity to choose a good street and avoid a bad one. Therefore, it is crucial to construct safe and beautiful streetscapes for users, especially pedestrians. This work explores the impact of streetscape characteristics under both daylight and night-time conditions, extracted from photographs, on the perceived safety and aesthetic appreciation of pedestrians in Xuzhou, China. The results show the following. (1) Perceived safety and aesthetic appreciation in the daytime are significantly greater than at night. (2) The higher the percentage of buildings and motor vehicles in the photographs, the lower the perceived safety. The higher the percentage of vegetation, the greater the aesthetic appreciation. (3) Illuminating pedestrians' immediate surroundings is conducive to improving the perceived safety of pedestrians. Finally, this paper suggests improvements to the perceived safety and aesthetic quality of streetscapes in the daytime and at night. These can be used to facilitate improved city streetscape design. However, these results should be used cautiously as the use of photograph-based analysis may not fully reflect the in situ situation.
C1 [Wang, Ronghua; Lu, Tianshu; Wan, Chuanwei; Sun, Xinkun; Jiang, Wuxian] Jiangsu Normal Univ, Sch Geog Geomat & Planning, 101, Shanghai Rd, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
C3 Jiangsu Normal University
RP Wang, RH (通讯作者)，Jiangsu Normal Univ, Sch Geog Geomat & Planning, 101, Shanghai Rd, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM 704568481@qq.com; 1003436854@qq.com; 1823019389@qq.com; 2385080299@qq.com; 247774700@qq.com
FU Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [19KJB220007]
CR Akpinar A, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V16, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.004
   Andrews M, 2010, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V30, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.001
   Appleton Jay, 1996, THE EXPERIENCE OF LANDSCAPE, V0, P0
   Asakawa S, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V68, P167, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00158-0
   Asgarzadeh M, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.001
   Baran PK, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V35, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.009
   Blöbaum A, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P465, DOI 10.1177/0013916504269643
   Bonthoux S, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.056
   Boyce PR, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V151, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.020
   Coleman AF, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V64, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127258
   Crow T, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V75, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.002
   Dong W, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V185, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.012
   Falchi F, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P2714, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.029
   Foster S, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P1156, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.07.007
   Fotios S, 2018, LIGHT RES TECHNOL, V51, P14771535187754
   Gobster PH, 2007, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V22, P959, DOI 10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x
   Guan C, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126973
   Gulwadi GB, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V187, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.003
   Gwedla N, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V189, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.001
   Haans A, 2012, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V32, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.006
   Harvey C, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V142, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.007
   He H, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126789
   Huang DK, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V68, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127480
   Huang WJ, 2018, TOURISM MANAGE, V66, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.006
   Hur M, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V38, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.001
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jansson M, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.005
   Jiang LK, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V143, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.005
   Joglekar S, 2020, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V7, P0, DOI 10.1098/rsos.190987
   Johansson M, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V39, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.002
   Junge X, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V133, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010
   Kaplan Rachel, 1989, THE EXPERIENCE OF NATURE: A PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE, V0, P0
   Ki D, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
   Kirillova K, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V42, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.12.006
   LANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159, DOI 10.2307/2529310
   Li YR, 2016, MATEC WEB CONF, V61, P0, DOI 10.1051/matecconf/20166104009
   Lis A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11174565
   Liu J, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.003
   Lynch Kevin, 1964, THE IMAGE OF THE CITY, V0, P0
   Ma XY, 2021, CITIES, V110, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103086
   Mak BKL, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V171, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.012
   Manning R, 2015, PARK SCIENCE, V32, P9
   Maslow A, 1970, MOTIVATION PERSONALI, V3rd, P0, DOI 10.1037/H0039764
   MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development), 2019, PLANN STAND URB COMP, V0, P0
   MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development), 2009, COD LIGHT DES URB NI, V0, P0
   Mullaney J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.013
   NBS, 2021, CHINA STATISTICS YEARBOOK, V0, P0
   Rossetti T, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V181, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.020
   Semenzato P, 2011, FORESTS, V0, P245, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1_9
   Sims-Gould J, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V15, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.100620
   SMARDON RC, 1988, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V15, P85, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90018-7
   STAHLE L, 1989, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V6, P259, DOI 10.1016/0169-7439(89)80095-4
   Troy A, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.010
   Ulrich RS, 1979, LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, V4, P17, DOI 10.1080/01426397908705892
   Ulrich RS, 1983, HUMAN BEHAV ENV, V6, P85, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4
   Van den Berg AE, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V20, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.011
   Verma D, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V186, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107340
   Völker S, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V78, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.047
   Wang RH, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V66, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389
   Wang RH, 2020, LANDSCAPE RES, V45, P649, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2019.1699507
   Wang RH, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V43, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.05.018
   Wang RH, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V41, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005
   Wang RG, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V28, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.10.010
   Wang XS, 2016, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V96, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.028
   Xiao JL, 2018, CITIES, V76, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.013
   Xiao Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V181, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.013
   Xuzhou Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2021, XUZH STAT YB, V0, P0
   Zhang H, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V101, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.010
   Zhao JW, 2022, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V176, P65, DOI 10.1680/jurdp.22.00024
   Zhao JW, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000742
   Zhao JW, 2018, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V17, P1483, DOI 10.30638/eemj.2018.147
NR 71
TC 16
Z9 17
U1 9
U2 90
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD SEP 1
PY 2023
VL 149
IS 3
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4314
PG 12
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA M4PI7
UT WOS:001030041800030
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Kim, YA
   Wo, JC
AF Kim, Young-An
   Wo, James C.
TI The time-varying effects of physical environment for walkability on neighborhood crime
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Walkability; Physical environment; Time; Crime; Spatial-temporal pattern
ID violent crime; guardianship; network; places; scale
AB The current study conducts a spatial-temporal examination of physical environment for walkability and crime in block groups located across nine U.S. cities. We aggregated the crime data for each of the different crime types using the block group where the crime occurred and the 2-hour period of the 24-hour day when the crime occurred. We estimated models at each 2-hour time slot (for weekdays and weekends), separately, to look at the effect of the walkability measure on crime at different hours of the day. Our results show that the crime enhancing effect of physical environment for walkability changes across different hours of the day, and such temporal patterns vary by different types of crime. Crime-enhancing effect of physical environment for walk ability is relatively stronger during very early morning time (midnight-4 am), and the risk of crime as a result of neighborhood walkability peaks in the late afternoon (2-4 or 4-6 pm). The measure of physical environment for walkability has different effect on crime patterns across hours of the day as the usage and meaning of physical environment and routine activities of people visiting the area, and thus the structures of criminal opportunities and guardianship capability temporally vary at different time periods.
C1 [Kim, Young-An] Florida State Univ, Coll Criminol & Criminal Justice, Tallahassee, FL USA.
   [Wo, James C.] Univ Iowa, Dept Sociol & Criminol, Iowa City, IA USA.
   [Kim, Young-An] Florida State Univ, Coll Criminol & Criminal Justice, 112 South Copeland St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida State University; University of Iowa; State University System of Florida; Florida State University
RP Kim, YA (通讯作者)，Florida State Univ, Coll Criminol & Criminal Justice, Tallahassee, FL USA.; Kim, YA (通讯作者)，Florida State Univ, Coll Criminol & Criminal Justice, 112 South Copeland St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
EM youngan.kim@fsu.edu
CR Andresen MA, 2020, ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY: EVOLUTION, V0, P0
   Bernasco W, 2011, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V48, P33, DOI 10.1177/0022427810384135
   Boessen A, 2015, CRIMINOLOGY, V53, P399, DOI 10.1111/1745-9125.12074
   Brantingham P, 1993, ROUTINE ACTIVITY RAT, V0, P0
   Brantingham Pe, 1984, PATTERNS CRIME, V0, P0
   Brantingham PJ, 2016, THE GEOMETRY OF CRIME AND CRIME PATTERN THEORY. ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIME ANALYSIS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.2307/2094589
   Brantingham Patricia, 1995, EUROPEAN JOURNAL ON CRIMINAL POLICY AND RESEARCH, V3, P5, DOI 10.1007/BF02242925
   Carlson JA, 2021, SOC SCI MED, V270, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113694
   Chapman J, 2021, SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE, V0, P0
   Cowen C, 2019, SECUR J, V32, P264, DOI 10.1057/s41284-018-00161-7
   Davies T, 2015, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V31, P481, DOI 10.1007/s10940-014-9235-4
   Dong HW, 2017, J URBAN DES, V22, P59, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2016.1247644
   EPA, 2021, NATIONAL WALKABILITY INDEX METHODOLOGY AND USER GUIDE, V0, P0
   Ewing R, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P5, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15591585
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Felson MarcusRachel Boba Santos, 2010, CRIME AND EVERYDAY LIFE, V4th, P0, DOI 10.4135/9781483349299
   Frith MJ, 2017, CRIMINOLOGY, V55, P344, DOI 10.1111/1745-9125.12133
   Gilderbloom JI, 2015, CITIES, V42, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.08.001
   Groff ER, 2014, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V51, P277, DOI 10.1177/0022427813512494
   Haberman CP, 2018, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V55, P425, DOI 10.1177/0022427818758375
   Haberman CP, 2015, CRIMINOLOGY, V53, P457, DOI 10.1111/1745-9125.12076
   Hipp JR, 2021, JUSTICE Q, V38, P767, DOI 10.1080/07418825.2020.1730423
   Hipp JR, 2020, ANNU REV CRIMINOL, V3, P75, DOI 10.1146/annurev-crimino1-011419-041423
   Hipp JR, 2019, JUSTICE Q, V36, P718, DOI 10.1080/07418825.2018.1445276
   Hipp JR, 2019, J CRIM JUST, V60, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.10.005
   Hipp JR, 2016, CRIMINOLOGY, V54, P653, DOI 10.1111/1745-9125.12117
   Kim YA, 2022, BRIT J CRIMINOL, V62, P124, DOI 10.1093/bjc/azab048
   Kim YA, 2020, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V36, P725, DOI 10.1007/s10940-019-09428-7
   Lee N, 2021, ENVIRON BEHAV, V53, P753, DOI 10.1177/0013916520921843
   Lee SM, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V65, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127336
   Li N, 2023, CRIME DELINQUENCY, V69, P2303, DOI 10.1177/00111287221114803
   Mooney SJ, 2020, HEALTH PLACE, V63, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102332
   Peterson RD, 2000, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V37, P31, DOI 10.1177/0022427800037001002
   Ratcliffe JH, 2004, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V18, P61, DOI 10.1080/13658810310001596076
   Reynald DM, 2011, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V48, P110, DOI 10.1177/0022427810384138
   Reynald DM, 2010, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V47, P358, DOI 10.1177/0022427810365904
   Rossmo D, 2000, GEOGRAPHIC PROFILING, V0, P0
   Rossmo DK, 2019, JUSTICE QUARTERLY, V0, P1
   Sampson RJ, 2012, GREAT AMERICAN CITY: CHICAGO AND THE ENDURING NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECT, V0, P0
   Sampson RJ, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P918, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5328.918
   Speck Jeff, 2012, WALKABLE CITY DOWNTO, V0, P0
   Taylor RB, 1988, HUMAN TERRITORIAL FUNCTIONING, V0, P0
   Taylor RalphB, 2015, COMMUNITY CRIMINOLOG, V0, P0
   Thomas J, 2017, NATIONAL WALKABILITY INDEX USER GUIDE AND METHODOLOGY, V0, P0
   WalkScore, 2021, CIT NEIGHB, V0, P0
   Watson KB, 2020, PREV MED, V137, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106122
   Weisburd DL, 2012, THE CRIMINOLOGY OF PLACE: STREET SEGMENTS AND OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE CRIME PROBLEM, V0, P0
   Welsh BC, 2009, JUSTICE Q, V26, P716, DOI 10.1080/07418820802506206
   Wo JC, 2024, CRIME DELINQUENCY, V70, P1943, DOI 10.1177/00111287221106946
   Wo JC, 2023, BRIT J CRIMINOL, V63, P304, DOI 10.1093/bjc/azac011
   Yoon H, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V21, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101082
   Zahnow R, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P706, DOI 10.1177/2399808319890614
   Zahnow Renee, 1900, V0, V0, P0
   Zhang HX, 2022, APPL GEOGR, V140, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102666
NR 54
TC 11
Z9 13
U1 4
U2 22
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD NOV 15
PY 2023
VL 142
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104530
EA AUG 2023
PG 12
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA T3YW5
UT WOS:001077387100001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Togiti, D
   Naik, G
   Bagadi, RC
AF Togiti, Dhilip
   Naik, Gopal
   Bagadi, Ramesh Chandra
TI Investigation on Built-up, Population, and Road Network Density Dynamics Using GIS, Regression, and Causation Analysis: A Case Study of Hyderabad City, India
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID urban expansion
AB In the present study, the dynamics of built-up and population, and the distribution of the road network were investigated to assess the efficiency of land consumption in the Hyderabad Metropolitan Area (HMA) between the years 1975 and 2015. Statistical techniques, geographic information systems (GIS), and causation analysis have been adopted to quantify and study land consumption efficiency. For this purpose, the built-up and population data are obtained from the Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL) and road network maps are obtained from the OpenStreetMap (OSM) data set. To assess land use efficiency (LUE), the methodology provided in "SDG 11.3.1. Metadata" is adopted. From the results, it is evident that the average accuracy of the GHSL population layer between the years 1990 and 2015 was more than 90% and the absolute percent error of the GHSL population layer decreased with time. It was also observed that between 1990 and 2015 the HMA was stably moving toward sufficient land per person. Through correlation analysis, it was identified that there exists a very strong correlation between built-up, population, and road network density. The causation analysis using a novel coefficient of causation affirmed that changes in built-up and population are both caused equal changes on their counterpart and the built-up and population both influenced the changes in the road density of the HMA. From the findings of the current article, it is evident that the correlation and the causation analysis together give a clear understanding of the built-up and population dynamics.
C1 [Togiti, Dhilip; Naik, Gopal; Bagadi, Ramesh Chandra] Osmania Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.
C3 Osmania University
RP Togiti, D (通讯作者)，Osmania Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.
EM togitidhilip@gmail.com; mgnaikc@osmania.ac.in; rameshcbagadi@uwalumni.com
FU University Grants Commission (UGC), India; Government of India; Government of Telangana; European Commission
CR Unknown -, 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE, V1, P0
   Unknown -, 2000, MILL DEV GOALS, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2018, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL, V0, P0
   Aquilino M, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs12060950
   Bounoua L, 2020, URBAN SCI, V4, P0, DOI 10.3390/urbansci4020018
   Brul‚ J, 2017, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Chen RX, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9110637
   DAVIS K, 1965, SCI AM, V213, P41
   Dhilip T, 2022, ASIAN RES J CURR SCI, V4, P217
   Donnay JP, 2001, REMOTE SENSING AND URBAN ANALYSIS, V0, P0
   Gilani H, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/land9040123
   Gilliland M, 2010, FORECASTING FAQS, V0, P193
   Pham HM, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.009
   Harvey D, 1996, CITY, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/13604819608900022
   Melchiorri M, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8020096
   Melchiorri M, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs10050768
   Qtiashat D, 2018, MODERN APPLIED SCIENCE, V12, P128, DOI 10.5539/mas.v12n4p128
   Rui YK, 2014, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V28, P1425, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2014.893347
   Schiavina M, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11205674
   Shamshad JHK, 2012, INDIAN STREAMS RES J, V1, P1
   Soffianian A, 2010, WORLD APPL SCI J, V9, P1370
   Strollo A, 2020, J MAPS, V16, P113, DOI 10.1080/17445647.2020.1758808
   Sutthichaimethee P, 2018, RESOURCES-BASEL, V7, P0, DOI 10.3390/resources7040087
   UN-Habitat, 2018, MET SDGS IND 11 3 1, V0, P0
   Wang L, 2012, CHINESE SCI BULL, V57, P2802, DOI 10.1007/s11434-012-5235-7
   Wang YC, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs12030357
   Xu C, 2007, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V22, P925, DOI 10.1007/s10980-007-9079-5
   Zhang JX, 2020, THE INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF THE PHOTOGRAMMETRY REMOTE SENSING AND SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCES, VXLII-3/W10, P1073, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w10-1073-2020
   Zhao GL, 2017, LAND-BASEL, V6, P0, DOI 10.3390/land6020030
   Zhao SQ, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P9600, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b00065
NR 30
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 2
U2 24
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD SEP 1
PY 2023
VL 149
IS 3
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4186
PG 13
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA M4PI7
UT WOS:001030041800005
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Kapoor, SS
   Brar, TS
   Kaur, J
AF Kapoor, Sahil Singh
   Brar, Tejwant Singh
   Kaur, Jatinder
TI Decision Support System for Measuring Pedestrian Accessibility to Public Transit Nodes
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Expert questionnaire survey; Noida; Pedestrian accessibility; Spatial multiple criteria analysis; Transit-oriented development
ID oriented development; land-use; place model; integration; transport; tod
AB Worldwide, most previous studies based on the transit-oriented development (TOD) concept focused heavily on the three Ds (3Ds) application in TOD (e.g., urban density, design, and land use diversity). Along with the 3Ds, three other TOD dimensions of transportation characteristics, such as destination accessibility, local distance to metro station, and travel demand management (TDM), and sociodemographics, which is the seventh dimension, significantly contribute to decision-making in TOD policies. It is hard to infer the actual travel behavior of transit riders when assessing transit nodes on foot from the static land use distribution that is assigned in the master plan. The novelty of this study is that an aggregated TOD index equation is formulated that uses an expert questionnaire, which involves 31 respondents and a spatial multiple criteria analysis (SMCA) tool, to assign weights and ranks to three identified TOD criteria that strongly influence pedestrian accessibility to metro stations. This study has examined all seven dimensions of TOD along with the impact of seasonal variation on short-distance walking to transit stations in the grid-layout planned Indian city of Noida (Uttar Pradesh, India), which used a Global Positioning System (GPS)-based metro station survey questionnaire. The path walkability evaluation of typical pedestrian routes that use GPS devices identifies typical pedestrian barriers in the urban planning of Noida that dissuade pedestrian accessibility for all. Three suitable TOD criteria, such as distance to the metro station, pedestrian destination accessibility, and availability of two-wheeler parking areas near a metro station, have a statistically significant association with walking to transit nodes. The TOD policy for brownfield urban areas should look at improving pedestrian accessibility for all and revise pedestrian guidelines for Indian cities to address inequitable walking environments. The integration of urban development with the public transit system offers a promising approach to encourage higher transit ridership and discourage citizens from using their private automobiles, especially for daily short and medium trip lengths. The future growth in the transit system when reshaping urban development around metro stations cannot be achieved until pedestrian-accessible streets and sidewalks are enhanced to easily assess transit stations on foot. A portable GPS tracking device and a smart Android phone could be used along with other state-of-the-art technologies to analyze the travel behavior of transit users and the physical evaluation of the actual walkable routes taken by them to reach their nearest metro station. The free smart mobile apps allow researchers and nonresearchers, especially in developing nations, to conduct field surveys that use smart Android phones with GPS location facilities and cameras to capture live images.
C1 [Kapoor, Sahil Singh; Brar, Tejwant Singh] Sushant Univ, Sch Art & Architecture, Gurugram 122003, Haryana, India.
   [Kaur, Jatinder] IP Estate, Sch Planning & Architec ture, Architecture, Delhi 110002, India.
RP Kapoor, SS (通讯作者)，Sushant Univ, Sch Art & Architecture, Gurugram 122003, Haryana, India.
EM sahilkapoor.phd19@sushantuniversity.edu.in; brartejwant@yahoo.com; ar.jatinder@gmail.com
FU The study acknowledges all 31 respondents from various architecture and urban planning specializations who actively participated and filled out the expert questionnaire survey. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the p
CR Aguarón J, 2019, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V7, P0, DOI 10.3390/math7030242
   Bajaj G, 2021, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V22, P384, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2019.2958259
   Bokonda PL, 2019, INT. J. INNOV. TECHNOL. EXPLOR. ENG, V8, P4749, DOI 10.35940/ijitee.l3583.1081219
   Calthorpe P, 1993, THE NEXT AMERICAN METROPOLIS: ECOLOGY, V0, P0
   Di Leo G, 2020, EUR RADIOL EXP, V4, P0, DOI 10.1186/s41747-020-0145-y
   Evans J, 2007, TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES, V0, P1
   Huang RJ, 2018, J TRANSP LAND USE, V11, P305, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2018.1110
   Joshi R, 2017, TOWARDS AN INCLUSIVE AND LOW-CARBON TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN INDIAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Joshi R, 2020, LAP FOR TRANSIT: ILLUSTRATED HANDBOOK FOR INDIAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Kamruzzaman M, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V34, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.002
   Kapoor SS, 2022, P INT ARCH PHOT REM, V0, P0
   Kapoor SS, 2023, INNOV INFRASTRUCT SO, V8, P0, DOI 10.1007/s41062-023-01037-5
   Khare Rupali, 2021, ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, V14, P0, DOI 10.1007/s12517-021-07142-y
   Kidokoro T, 2019, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEV, V0, P0
   Kothari CR, 2004, RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: METHODS AND TECHNIQUES, V0, P0
   Kumar PP, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V78, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.015
   Li Q, 2018, J. ADV. TRANSP, V2018, P1
   Liu SQ, 2022, GEOGR ANAL, V54, P559, DOI 10.1111/gean.12290
   Maarseveen MV, 2019, GIS IN SUSTAINABLE URBAN PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE, V0, P0
   McHugh ML, 2013, BIOCHEM MEDICA, V23, P143, DOI 10.11613/BM.2013.018
   Noida Authority, 2011, NOIDA MASTER PLAN - 2031, V0, P0
   Papa E, 2018, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, V0, PP285, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_17
   Park S, 2008, DEFINING MEASURING E, V0, P0
   Patnala PK, 2020, ASIAN TRANSP. STUD, V6, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.eastsj.2020.100021
   Renne JL, 2013, UNOTI PUBLICATIONS, V0, P0
   Saaty TL, 2008, INT J SERVICES SCI, V1, P0, DOI 10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590
   Singh YJ, 2012, WIT T BUILT ENV, V128, P719, DOI 10.2495/UT120611
   Singh YJ, 2017, TRANSPORT POLICY, V56, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.013
   Singh YJ, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V35, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.014
   Su SL, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V90, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102939
   Suzuki H, 2013, TRANSFORMING CITIES, V0, P0
   Vale DS, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V69, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.004
   Vale DS, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V45, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.009
   Xiao Y, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.013
NR 34
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 6
U2 62
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD DEC 1
PY 2023
VL 149
IS 4
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4516
PG 8
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA W1RC3
UT WOS:001089465200031
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Salaheldin, HT
   Major, MD
   Ahmad, AM
   Tannous, HO
AF Salaheldin, Hadeel T.
   Major, Mark David
   Ahmad, Ahmad Mohammed
   Tannous, Heba O.
TI Analyzing walkability in the vicinity of three metro stations in Doha, Qatar
SO OPEN HOUSE INTERNATIONAL-SUSTAINABLE & SMART ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Neighborhood; Public transport; Town planning; Urban studies; Walkability
ID urban design
AB PurposeMany factors contribute to public rail transit use in an urban network. However, a dysfunctional relationship between the built environment and the transport system significantly deters such use. Architects, urban designers, town planners and policymakers must understand the factors that promote or deter pedestrian use of the urban environment.Design/methodology/approachThe paper investigates four connectivity and walkability factors for three different metro stations in Doha, Qatar: Al Aziziyah, Hamad Hospital and West Bay. The analysis includes pedestrian sheds, block sizes, ground-level land uses and connectedness in the urban spatial network based on catchment contour maps using space syntax.FindingsThe results indicate the three metro stations and neighborhoods are representative of diverse type of neighborhoods in Doha: relatively compact but expansive for the Hamad Hospital Station area, metrically and topologically restrictive due to the poor planning and the peninsular location of the reclaimed land in the West Bay area, and expansive, shallow and reliant on attraction for the Al Waab transportation corridor associated with Al Aziziyah Station.Research limitations/implicationsTime factors and temporary closure/capacity reductions due to the global pandemic restricted planned efforts to collect more pedestrian use data based on passive observations and preference choices using surveys during the study. Nonetheless, adapting the investigation to the circumstances produced significant findings.Social implicationsThe analysis can help us develop better guidelines and diagnostic tools to calibrate design and planning strategies promoting more walkable, healthy and sustainable neighborhoods.Originality/valueThe study is original due to examining stations of the new Doha Metro for the first time. However, it relies on well-established representational techniques in urban morphology and space syntax research.
C1 [Salaheldin, Hadeel T.; Major, Mark David; Ahmad, Ahmad Mohammed; Tannous, Heba O.] Qatar Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Architecture & Urban Planning, Doha, Qatar.
C3 Qatar University
RP Major, MD (通讯作者)，Qatar Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Architecture & Urban Planning, Doha, Qatar.
EM hs1000063@squ.edu.qa; m.major@qu.edu.qa; am.ahmad@qu.edu.qa; heba.tannous@qu.edu.qa
FU Qatar University [QUSDCENG-2018/2019-4, QUCG-CENG-20/21-1]
CR Abley S, 2011, PREDICTING WALKABILITY, V452, P0
   Al Saeed M, 2019, J CULT HERIT MANAG S, V9, P394, DOI 10.1108/JCHMSD-09-2018-0062
   Alfonzo M, 2014, PREV MED, V69, PS79, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.002
   Appleyard D, 1981, LIVABLE STREETS, V0, P0
   Arup, 2016, TOTAL DESIGN TIME AR, V0, P0
   Berrigan D, 2010, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V9, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-9-20
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Clifton KJ, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   De Bourdeaudhuij I, 2005, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V8, P886, DOI 10.1079/PHN2005735
   Dijkstra J, 2002, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V11, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00093-5
   Evans G, 2009, BUILT ENV LONDON 197, V35, P366, DOI 10.2148/benv.35.3.366
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Forsyth A, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800701816896
   Furlan R, 2015, ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, V06, P1, DOI 10.4172/2151-6200.1000116
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 1971, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS, V0, P0
   Ghidini, 2011, CAMINHABILIDADE MEDI, V0, P0
   Giles-Corti B, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.011
   Guo Z, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.013
   Handy S, 2005, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V28, P146, DOI 10.1177/0160017604273626
   Hass-Klau Carmen, 2015, THE PEDESTRIAN AND THE CITY, V0, P0
   Hess P, 1999, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1674, P9, DOI 10.3141/1674-02
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Krambeck HV, 2006, GLOBAL WALKABILITY I, V0, P0
   Krogstad JR, 2015, EUR J AGEING, V12, P249, DOI 10.1007/s10433-015-0340-5
   Leslie E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
   Lo RH, 2009, J URBANISM INT RES P, V2, P145, DOI 10.1080/17549170903092867
   Major MD, 2020, 56 ISOCARP VIRTUAL W, V0, P0
   MONTGOMERY C, 2013, HAPPY CITY, V0, P0
   Newman PeterJeffrey Kenworthy, 2015, THE END OF AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCE: HOW CITIES ARE MOVING BEYOND CAR-BASED PLANNING, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-613-4
   Ozbil A, 2015, A ITU J FACULTY ARCH, V12, P189
   Salama AM, 2013, DEMYSTIFYING DOHA: ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM IN AN EMERGING CITY, V0, P1
   Schmid H, 2006, DESIGN IS ATTITUDE, V0, P0
   Shaaban K, 2014, J TRAFFIC LOGISTICS, V2, P241, DOI 10.12720/jtle.2.3.241-247
   Su SL, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V67, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.005
   Tannous HO, 2020, 56 ISOCARP VIRTUAL W, V0, P0
   Weil DN, 2006, EC GROWTH, V0, P0
   Zhu W, 2011, J GEOGR SYST, V13, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10109-010-0122-8
NR 38
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 3
U2 40
PU EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
PI Leeds
PA Floor 5, Northspring 21-23 Wellington Street, Leeds, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
SN 0168-2601
EI 2633-9838
J9 OPEN HOUSE INT
JI Open House Int.
PD SEP 7
PY 2023
VL 48
IS 3
BP 487
EP 503
DI 10.1108/OHI-08-2022-0207
EA DEC 2022
PG 17
WC Architecture; Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA Q6JV8
UT WOS:000894702400001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Benton, JS
   Jennings, G
   Walker, J
   Evans, J
AF Benton, Jack S.
   Jennings, Gail
   Walker, Jim
   Evans, James
TI ?Walking is our asset?: How to retain walking as a valued mode of transport in African cities
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Walking; Active mobility; NMT; Africa; Pedestrian travel; Transport policy
ID non-motorized transport; dar-es-salaam; accessibility; walkability; challenges; congestion; city
AB Walking is the primary mode of transport in African cities. Despite a growing number of policies recognizing the need to retain and protect people walking, walking infrastructure is still lacking on the continent. There is a dearth of research about the key barriers and enablers that influence the way in which transport and urban planning policies are implemented in Africa, and international best practices lack relevance for African contexts. This study explores the political and decision-making processes in transport authorities in Africa to understand why walking receives marginal resource allocation and operationalisation. Thirteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with national-and city-level stakeholders working in transport policy and practice in Africa. Stakeholders perceived that walking is undervalued by stakeholders and by those who do not have to walk. Barriers to change include ineffective policies, and limited capacity and knowledge to affect change. Importantly, a major constraint for African city authorities to support walking is the bias of funding towards large infrastructure schemes rather than just the availability of funding. A redefinition of a successful mobility system was perceived as necessary to transform the way that walking is valued. This study has important im-plications to better support walking in African cities.
C1 [Benton, Jack S.; Evans, James] Univ Manchester, Dept Geog, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, England.
   [Jennings, Gail] Univ Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Walker, Jim] Walk21 Fdn, Cheltenham, England.
C3 University of Manchester; University of Cape Town
RP Benton, JS (通讯作者)，Univ Manchester, Dept Geog, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, England.
EM jack.benton@manchester.ac.uk
CR Acheampong RA, 2022, TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY FUTURES IN URBAN AFRICA, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-17327-11
   Acheampong RA, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V98, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103257
   Acheampong RA, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V69, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.004
   Anciaes PR, 2017, CITIES, V67, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.008
   Unknown -, 2018, TRANSPORT AND CLIMATE CHANGE GLOBAL STATUS REPORT 2018, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2013, GLOBAL REPORT ON HUMAN SETTLEMENTS, V0, P0
   Arellana J, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P183, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
   Bassett DR, 2008, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V5, P795, DOI 10.1123/jpah.5.6.795
   Behrens R, 2016, MOBILITY ACCESS SUBS, V0, P0
   Behrens R, 2005, PLAN PRACT RES, V20, P163, DOI 10.1080/02697450500414686
   Bhattacharyya DB, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V96, P2737, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.307
   Braun V, 2006, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, V3, P77, DOI 10.1037/13620-004
   Bruun E, 2015, PARATRANSIT AFRICAN, V0, P0
   Campbell KB, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V74, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.08.002
   Chikaraishi M, 2015, J E ASIA SOC TRANSPO, V11, P1328, DOI 10.11175/easts.11.1328
   Corburn J, 2004, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V94, P541, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.94.4.541
   Doan P, 2012, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V36, P1306, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01075.x
   Fabian H, 2010, WALKABILITY AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN ASIAN CITIES: STATE AND ISSUES, V0, P17
   Ferrari G, 2020, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V0, P0
   Figueroa MJ, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.02.006
   Herrmann-Lunecke MG, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P135, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2020.1712494
   Jennings G, 2019, SCOPING STUDY TRANSP, V0, P0
   Jennings G, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V5, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100117
   Jennings G, 2017, TRANSP SOC, V0, P206
   Jobanputra R, 2021, 39 ANN SO AFR TRANSP, V0, P0
   Khayesi M, 2017, TRANSP SOC, V0, P224
   Kim EJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11246915
   Loo BPY, 2019, TRANSPORT REV, V39, P181, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2018.1442889
   Lucas K, 2019, TRANSPORT AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN FIVE AFRICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Melbye DC, 2015, HABITAT INT, V46, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.12.004
   Mokitimi MM, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V25, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.491
   Moller-Jensen L, 2012, NORSK GEOGR TIDSSKR, V66, P52, DOI 10.1080/00291951.2011.644322
   Mulyadi AM, 2022, WALKABILITY IMPORTAN, V16, P0
   Njoh A, 2017, PLANNING IN CONTEMPORARY AFRICA: THE STATE, V0, P0
   Olvera LD, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V32, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.009
   Oyeyemi AL, 2013, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-12-16
   Palinkas LA, 2015, ADM POLICY MENT HLTH, V42, P533, DOI 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   Porter G, 2020, POSITION PAPER: THE STATE OF KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCH FOR VOLVO RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION (VREF) ONLINE, V0, P0
   Reis RS, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V45, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.020
   Rottingen JA, 2013, LANCET, V382, P1286, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61046-6
   Sagaris L, 2022, WALKING, V0, P0
   Satterthwaite D, 2016, BACKGROUND PAPER CUR, V5, P0
   Sectra, 2018, SECTRA ENCUESTAS DE MOVILIDAD, V0, P0
   Tiwari G, 2020, ROAD TRAFFIC INJURY, V0, P0
   Triches Lucchesi S, 2022, LIBR J, V0, P1
   UN Environment, 2016, GLOB OUTL WALK CYCL, V0, P0
   UN Environment, 2021, WALK CYCL GLOB OUTL, V0, P0
   United Nations Environment Programme and United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2022, WALK CYCL AFR EV GOO, V0, P0
   Vanderschuren M, 2017, TRANSP SOC, V0, P57
   Vanderschuren M, 2017, TRANSP SOC, V0, P11
   Vanderschuren M, 2017, TRANSP SOC, V0, P1
   Venter C, 2019, FROM MOBILITY TO ACCESS FOR ALL: EXPANDING URBAN TRANSPORTATION CHOICES IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH, V0, P0
   Walk 21, 2022, AFR NETW WALK CYCL A, V0, P0
   Wang H, 2019, CITIES, V93, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
   Wang YP, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V10, P146, DOI 10.1177/0975425319859129
   Wolfram M, 2016, CITIES, V51, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011
   Wood A, 2022, LIBR J, V0, P1
   World Bank, 2019, GUIDE FOR ROAD SAFETY OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES: LOWAND MIDDLEINCOME COUNTRIES COUNTRY PROFILES, V0, P0
   Ziervogel G, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P494, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1141-9
NR 59
TC 27
Z9 34
U1 1
U2 14
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 137
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104297
EA MAR 2023
PG 9
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA D2HS7
UT WOS:000966990700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Koo, BW
   Guhathakurta, S
   Botchwey, N
   Hipp, A
AF Koo, Bon Woo
   Guhathakurta, Subhrajit
   Botchwey, Nisha
   Hipp, Aaron
TI Can good microscale pedestrian streetscapes enhance the benefits of macroscale accessible urban form? An automated audit approach using Google street view images
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Walkability; Accessibility; Streetscapes; Google Street View; Computer vision; Interaction effects
ID physical-activity; built environment; neighborhood walkability; walk accessibility; perceived safety; crime; design; model; association; perceptions
AB While pedestrian accessibility measures have been widely used interchangeably with walkability, walkability is not just about accessibility. Microscale streetscape factors can provide qualities that pedestrians seek, including safety from crime, traffic safety, and pleasurability. These qualities can encourage walking through direct con-tributions or by enhancing the benefits of macroscale accessibility measures, or both. This study examines the main and interaction effects of microscale streetscape factors measured from street view images using computer vision in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. The correlation analysis showed that many microscale factors have moderate to strong correlations with the pedestrian accessibility measure. Binary logistic regressions demonstrated that safety from crime, pleasurability, and composite microscale index have direct contributions to walking mode choice. Regarding moderating effects, traffic safety, safety from crime, and composite microscale index enhanced the benefits of pedestrian accessibility measure. Policies designed to encourage walking can focus on streetscape features for short term efforts. Important caveats for policymakers in using machine-driven data collection are discussed.
C1 [Koo, Bon Woo; Guhathakurta, Subhrajit] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Design, Sch City & Reg Planning, Atlanta, GA USA.
   [Botchwey, Nisha] Univ Minnesota, Humphrey Sch Publ Affairs, Minneapolis, MN USA.
   [Hipp, Aaron] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, Community Hlth & Sustainabil, Raleigh, NC USA.
   [Koo, Bon Woo] Sch City & Reg Planning, 245 Fourth St NW,Suite 204, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
C3 University System of Georgia; Georgia Institute of Technology; University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities; North Carolina State University
RP Koo, BW (通讯作者)，Sch City & Reg Planning, 245 Fourth St NW,Suite 204, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
EM bkoo34@gatech.edu; subhro.guha@design.gatech.edu; botchwey@umn.edu; jahipp@ncsu.edu
CR Adams MA, 2022, TRAINING COMPUTERS S, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.20944/preprints202203.0064.v1
   Adkins A, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2017.1322527
   Adkins A, 2012, J URBAN DES, V17, P499, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2012.706365
   Aghaabbasi M, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V5, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2016.08.012
   Ortiz-Ramirez HA, 2021, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V78, P480, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.007
   Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Alfonzo M, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P29, DOI 10.1080/13574800701803456
   Annunziata A, 2020, COMPUTATIONAL SCI IT, V0, P0
   Arvidsson D, 2012, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V44, P280, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31822a9289
   Badrinarayanan V, 2016, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Ball K, 2001, PREV MED, V33, P434, DOI 10.1006/pmed.2001.0912
   Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
   Bereitschaft B, 2018, JOURNAL OF URBANISM INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON PLACEMAKING AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, V11, P412, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2018.1484795
   Bereitschaft B, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/su9071233
   Bivina GR, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V67, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.007
   Bornioli A, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V123, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.006
   Bracy NL, 2014, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V11, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-24
   Brown BB, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17041385
   Cain KL, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V116, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042
   Cerin E, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V211, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.034
   Cerin E, 2013, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-78
   Cerin E, 2013, PREV MED, V56, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.024
   Chen YL, 2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV 2021), V0, PP14960, DOI 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01471
   Cunningham GO, 2004, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P435, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.6.435
   Day K, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
   De Vos J, 2023, TRANSPORT REV, V43, P303, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2022.2101072
   Deng J, 2009, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP248, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206848
   Domencich TA, 1975, URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND, V0, P0
   Donovan GH, 2012, ENVIRON BEHAV, V44, P3, DOI 10.1177/0013916510383238
   Dumbaugh E, 2009, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V75, P309, DOI 10.1080/01944360902950349
   Duncan DT, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V45, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.008
   Ewing R, 2013, METR PLANN DES, V0, PP1, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Forsyth A, 2015, URBAN DES INT, V20, P274, DOI 10.1057/udi.2015.22
   Foster S, 2008, PREV MED, V47, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017
   Foster S, 2014, PREV MED, V62, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.011
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   Fry D, 2020, J URBAN HEALTH, V97, P552, DOI 10.1007/s11524-019-00408-7
   Gebel K, 2009, ANN BEHAV MED, V37, P228, DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3
   Harvey C, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP1, DOI 10.3141/2500-01
   Harvey C, 2016, PROF GEOGR, V68, P149, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2015.1065546
   Harvey C, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V142, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.007
   Hipp JA, 2016, ENVIRON BEHAV, V48, P1292, DOI 10.1177/0013916515598200
   Hoehner CM, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023
   Hong J, 2014, TRANSPORTATION, V41, P1171, DOI 10.1007/s11116-014-9535-4
   Jacobs J, 1992, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jacobsen PL, 2009, INJURY PREV, V15, P369, DOI 10.1136/ip.2009.022566
   Jun HJ, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V62, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.014
   Ki D, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
   Kondo MC, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.003
   Koo BW, 2021, MEASURING STREET-LEVEL WALKABILITY THROUGH BIG IMAGE DATA AND ITS ASSOCIATIONS WITH WALKING BEHAVIOR, V0, P0
   Koo BW, 2022, HEALTH PLACE, V73, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102733
   Koo BW, 2022, ENVIRON BEHAV, V54, P211, DOI 10.1177/00139165211014609
   Lee S, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P368, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
   Lee SM, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V65, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127336
   Lehmann S, 2016, FUTURE CITIES ENV, V2, P1, DOI 10.1186/s40984-016-0021-3
   Lin TY, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8693, P740, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48
   Long J, 2015, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP3431, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965
   Manaugh K, 2011, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V16, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
   McCormack GR, 2014, HEALTH PLACE, V28, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.04.001
   McCormack GR, 2012, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V9, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-92
   McDonald NC, 2008, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V22, P433, DOI 10.4278/ajhp.22.6.433
   McFadden D, 1973, FRONTIERS IN ECONOMETRICS, V0, PP105, DOI 10.1108/EB028592
   Molina-García J, 2020, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V17, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-020-01028-0
   Moudon AV, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P21, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21
   Naik N, 2014, IEEE COMPUT SOC CONF, V0, PP793, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2014.121
   Nguyen QC, 2019, PREV MED REP, V14, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100859
   OBrien DT, 2019, SOC SCI MED, V228, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.015
   Orstad SL, 2017, ENVIRON BEHAV, V49, P904, DOI 10.1177/0013916516670982
   Owen N, 2004, AM J PREV MED, V27, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006
   Owen N, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V33, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025
   Park S, 2015, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V9, P529, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2013.825036
   Pot FJ, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V94, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103090
   Nguyen QC, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17176359
   Rebecchi A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11102778
   Rees-Punia E, 2018, PREV MED, V111, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.017
   Rundle AG, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V40, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.034
   Saelens BE, 2003, ANN BEHAV MED, V25, P80, DOI 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   Saha M, 2019, CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1145/3290605.3300292
   Salesses MP, 2012, PLACE PULSE: MEASURING THE COLLABORATIVE IMAGE OF THE CITY, V0, P0
   Sallis J F, 2015, HEALTH BEHAVIOR: THEORY, V0, P0
   Sallis JF, 2022, HEALTH PLACE, V77, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102857
   Sallis JF, 2015, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V12, P0, DOI 10.5888/pcd12.150098
   Shashank A, 2019, HEALTH PLACE, V55, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005
   Sugiyama T, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V15, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.100621
   Tobin M, 2022, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-12747-3
   Toker Z, 2015, URBAN STUDIES RESEARCH, V2015, P1, DOI 10.1155/2015/919874
   Wang RY, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.009
   Wilson JS, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V42, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.029
   Zhang EJ, 2023, TRANSACTIONS IN URBAN DATA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, V2, P3, DOI 10.1177/27541231221143608
   Zhao F, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP34, DOI 10.3141/1835-05
   Zhao HS, 2017, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP6230, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2017.660
   Zhou BL, 2017, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP5122, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2017.544
NR 94
TC 36
Z9 40
U1 18
U2 114
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD SEP 15
PY 2023
VL 237
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104816
EA MAY 2023
PG 13
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA K0QP3
UT WOS:001013583200001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Boiné, K
   Demers, CMH
   Parsaee, M
   Potvin, A
AF Boine, Kevin
   Demers, Claude M. H.
   Parsaee, Mojtaba
   Potvin, Andre
TI Visualization of urban heat and light at the pedestrian level
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE Visual representation; pedestrian; urban layout; surface materials; visual and non-visual experience
ID island mitigation; shading panels; impacts; models; health; geometry; city
AB This research aims at developing a methodology for integrated visualization of diurnal/nocturnal urban heat and light exposed to pedestrians. Heat and light are major environmental qualities affecting the visual and non-visual experiences of pedestrians in urban spaces. The configuration of urban layouts, including built-up area, density, and surface features, could modify the quality of heat and light exposed to pedestrians. The pedestrian-level integrated visualization of urban heat and light still requires further studies in relation to the individual's field of view, physical elements, and spatiotemporal variations. This research combines thermography, low-dynamic range (LDR) photography, and high-dynamic range (HDR) imagery with thermometry to discuss the typologies and attributes of heat and light which are offered within a 360-degree field of view of pedestrians in two urban layouts in Quebec City, Canada. The thermographic and thermometric methods reveal the non-visual qualities of urban spaces in terms of heat. The LDR photography and HDR imagery display the visual qualities of urban spaces related to light. The selected layouts include a densely constructed fabric and a green open urban space to represent diverse spatial configurations and surface materials. As an exploratory study, a 24-hour survey during a summer day is conducted to use the combined methods to capture and discuss the physical and environmental qualities of the urban layouts. The combined image-based methods foster an enriched, comprehensive visualization and discussion of diurnal and nocturnal patterns offered by air and surface temperatures and lighting conditions. The combined image-based approach enables visualizing and comparing typologies of urban heat and light in relation to building density, trees, greenery, and surface characteristics. Overall, the proposed methodology promotes the integrated visualization approach to study urban environmental qualities which can inform local communities, designers, and decision-makers about the impact of design configuration, material choices, and retrofit solutions.
C1 [Boine, Kevin; Demers, Claude M. H.; Parsaee, Mojtaba; Potvin, Andre] Laval Univ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
   [Parsaee, Mojtaba] McGill Univ, Sch Architecture, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
C3 Laval University; McGill University
RP Parsaee, M (通讯作者)，Laval Univ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.; Parsaee, M (通讯作者)，McGill Univ, Sch Architecture, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
EM mojtaba.parsaee@mcgill.ca
CR Boiné K, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V42, P674, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.028
   Boomsma C, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V39, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.004
   Boyce PR, 2014, HUMAN FACTORS IN LIGHTING, V0, P3
   Brandi U, 2006, LIGHT CITIES LIGHTIN, V0, P0
   Chebana F, 2013, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V57, P631, DOI 10.1007/s00484-012-0590-2
   Dai ZX, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P1136, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.165
   Debbage N, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V54, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.08.002
   Debevec PE, 1997, P SIGGRAPH, V0, PP369, DOI 10.1145/1401132.1401174
   Demers CMH, 2021, EXPERIENTIAL WALKS U, V0, PP223, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-76694-8_13
   Demers CMH, 2021, EXPERIENTIAL WALKS FOR URBAN DESIGN: REVEALING, V0, P0
   Demers CM, 2016, AMBIANCES, V2, P0, DOI 10.4000/ambiances.756
   DiLaura DL, 2011, LIGHTING HDB REFEREN, V0, P0
   Gago EJ, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V25, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.057
   Green J, 2015, HEALTH PLACE, V34, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.011
   Guo GH, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V135, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.007
   Inanici MN, 2006, LIGHTING RES TECHNOL, V38, P123, DOI 10.1191/13657828061i164oa
   Inanici M, 2010, LEUKOS, V7, P69, DOI 10.1582/LEUKOS.2010.07.02001
   Jamei E, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V54, P1002, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.104
   Jamei Y, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V659, P1335, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.308
   Khan A, 2021, URBAN HEAT ISLAND MODELING FOR TROPICAL CLIMATES, V0, PP179, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819669-4.00006-4
   Lau KKL, 2018, BUILD RES INF, V46, P540, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2018.1399583
   Lebel G, 2019, SURVEILLANCE IMPACTS, V0, P0
   Liang Z, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V708, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135011
   Luusua A, 2016, HUMAN COMPU, V0, PP275, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30028-3_13
   Marsh, 2020, SOFTWARE DEV, V0, P0
   Middel A, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V25, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.05.004
   Mirzaei PA, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V19, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.04.001
   Mirzaei PA, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P2192, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.04.001
   Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V94, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.032
   Nitidara NPA, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103622
   Oke TR, 2017, URBAN CLIMATES, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781139016476
   Parsaee M, 2022, DATA BRIEF, V42, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108278
   Parsaee M, 2021, SOL ENERGY, V220, P802, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2021.03.065
   Parsaee M, 2020, SOL ENERGY, V204, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.088
   Parsaee M, 2019, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V14, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100341
   Pilechiha P, 2022, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V11, P793, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-02-2021-0020
   Radhi H, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V113, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.013
   Rizwan AM, 2008, J ENVIRON SCI, V20, P120, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60019-4
   Rodriguez F, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107591
   Scorpio M, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/en13153809
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Takebayashi H, 2012, SOL ENERGY, V86, P2255, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2012.04.019
   Unger J, 2004, CLIM RES, V27, P253, DOI 10.3354/cr027253
   Wang YP, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.013
   Wang YP, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V26, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.015
   Williams CR, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010068
   Yang F, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V111, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.047
   Yue WZ, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V671, P1036, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.421
   Zhang ZJ, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18189677
   Zhou DC, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs11010048
   Zielinska-Dabkowska KM, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, P0, DOI 10.3390/su14106062
NR 51
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 14
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1226-5934
EI 2161-6779
J9 INT J URBAN SCI
JI Int. J. Urban Sci.
PD APR 3
PY 2023
VL 27
IS 2
BP 301
EP 321
DI 10.1080/12265934.2022.2121310
EA SEP 2022
PG 21
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA F6YO6
UT WOS:000850906500001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Bereitschaft, B
AF Bereitschaft, Bradley
TI The changing ethno-racial profile of 'very walkable' urban neighbourhoods in the US (2010-2020): Are minorities under-represented?
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE ethno-racial; neighbourhood change; neighbourhood walkability; walkability; walk score
ID built environment; physical-activity; economic value; united-states; walkability; gentrification; walking; transportation; affordability; displacement
AB Neighbourhood walkability has increasingly been viewed as an amenity that may confer substantial health, social and economic benefits. As walkable neighbourhoods become increasingly desirable, there is concern that disadvantaged groups - particularly lower-income and minority households - may be displaced or excluded from these spaces. This investigation assesses whether minorities, and Black residents in particular, are increasingly under-represented in urban neighbourhoods with high walkability by examining demographic changes between 2010 and 2020 across approximately 43,000 urban census tracts. The results suggest a negative association between Black and 'other' non-White residents and neighbourhood walkability when controlling for confounding factors. Blacks were also the only major ethno-racial group to decline in absolute number within the nation's most walkable (i.e. Walk Score (R) >= 90) urban neighbourhoods between 2010 and 2020. Implications for social equity and justice are discussed.
C1 [Bereitschaft, Bradley] Univ Nebraska, Omaha, NE 68182 USA.
C3 University of Nebraska System
RP Bereitschaft, B (通讯作者)，Univ Nebraska, Dept Geog Geol, Durham Sci Ctr 263,6001 Dodge St, Omaha, NE 68182 USA.
EM bbereitschaft@unomaha.edu
CR Acevedo-Garcia D, 2016, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V26, P607, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2016.1198410
   Unknown -, 2019, 2010 CENS URB RUR CL, V0, P0
   Been V, 2019, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V29, P25, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2018.1476899
   Benjamins MR, 2017, J RACIAL ETHN HEALTH, V4, P967, DOI 10.1007/s40615-016-0300-6
   Bereitschaft B, 2019, URBAN SCI, V3, P0, DOI 10.3390/urbansci3010011
   Bereitschaft B, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V118, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102206
   Bereitschaft B, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/su9071233
   Bereitschaft B, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P859, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2017.1297390
   Bhutta N, 2020, DISPARITIES IN WEALTH BY RACE AND ETHNICITY IN THE 2019 SURVEY OF CONSUMER FINANCES, V0, P0
   Carmona M, 2019, J URBAN DES, V24, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523
   Carr LJ, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V39, P460, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.007
   Cerin E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P713, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.002
   Charles CZ, 2003, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V29, P167, DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100002
   Chiu M, 2015, HEALTH REP, V26, P3
   Clark MI, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.08.001
   Clifton K, 2005, RESEARCH ON WOMENS ISSUES IN TRANSPORTATION: REPORT OF A CONFERENCE, V2, P79, DOI 10.17226/23299
   Cutts BB, 2009, SOC SCI MED, V69, P1314, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.020
   Dawkins CJ, 2004, J URBAN AFF, V26, P379, DOI 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00205.x
   Delbosc A, 2012, TRANSPORT POLICY, V23, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.006
   Delmelle E, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P134, DOI 10.1177/0042098019836631
   DeLuca S, 2019, CITY COMMUNITY, V18, P556, DOI 10.1111/cico.12386
   Ding L, 2016, CITYSCAPE, V18, P27
   Duncan DT, 2013, GEOJOURNAL, V78, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10708-011-9444-4
   Duncan DT, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13060611
   Duncan DT, 2012, DEMOGR RES, V26, P409, DOI 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.17
   Duncan DT, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P4160, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8114160
   Ellis M, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P519, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1360039
   Ewing R, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P5, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15591585
   Falkner B, 2014, CURR HYPERTENS REP, V16, P0, DOI 10.1007/s11906-014-0449-5
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Frank LD, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V21, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2020.101005
   Frank LD, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P568, DOI 10.1177/0739456x19831064
   Freeman L, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P39, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976337
   Frumkin Howard, 2004, URBAN SPRAWL PUBLIC, V0, P0
   Gibson JM, 2015, HEALTH PLACE, V35, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.07.005
   Guthrie A, 2016, TRANSPORT POLICY, V51, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.002
   Hall CM, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P223, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2017.1404607
   Hamidi S, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P1576, DOI 10.1177/0042098018767002
   Harvey C, 2016, PROF GEOGR, V68, P149, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2015.1065546
   Hong J, 2014, TRANSPORTATION, V41, P1171, DOI 10.1007/s11116-014-9535-4
   Howell NA, 2019, J AM HEART ASSOC, V8, P0, DOI 10.1161/JAHA.119.013146
   Hwang J, 2020, AM J SOCIOL, V126, P354, DOI 10.1086/711015
   Hwang J, 2014, AM SOCIOL REV, V79, P726, DOI 10.1177/0003122414535774
   Jackson J, 2015, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V25, P353, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2014.921221
   Kang B, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182111207
   Kim EJ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12020593
   Knight J, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V92, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.01.008
   Koschinsky J, 2015, CITYSCAPE, V17, P13
   Krambeck HV, 2006, GLOBAL WALKABILITY I, V0, P0
   Krivo LJ, 1996, SOC FORCES, V75, P619, DOI 10.2307/2580416
   Lee N, 2021, ENVIRON BEHAV, V53, P753, DOI 10.1177/0013916520921843
   Levine J, 2007, TRANSPORTATION, V34, P255, DOI 10.1007/s11116-006-9104-6
   Leyden KM, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1546, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
   Litman T, 2022, EVALUATING TRANSPORTATION EQUITY: GUIDANCE FOR INCORPORATING DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS IN TRANSPORT PLANNING, V0, P0
   Litman TA, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP3, DOI 10.3141/1828-01
   Liu ST, 2021, ECON LETT, V207, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110010
   Manaugh K, 2011, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V16, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
   Manson S, 2021, IPUMS NATL HIST GEOG, V0, P0
   McGrew T, 2018, AM J ECON SOCIOL, V77, P1013, DOI 10.1111/ajes.12243
   Melstrom RT, 2022, URBAN AFF REV, V58, P1622, DOI 10.1177/10780874211041537
   Murphy AlexandraK, 2015, FOCUS, V32, P19
   Nau C, 2020, PREV MED REP, V17, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100996
   Neckerman KM, 2009, J PUBLIC HEALTH POL, V30, PS264, DOI 10.1057/jphp.2008.47
   Oakes J Michael, 2007, EPIDEMIOL PERSPECT INNOV, V4, P16, DOI 10.1186/1742-5573-4-16
   Park S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP126, DOI 10.3141/2464-16
   Ravuri ED, 2020, PAP APPL GEOGR, V6, P369
   Renne JL, 2016, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V26, P819, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2016.1193038
   Rhodes A, 2017, AM EDUC RES J, V54, P168S, DOI 10.3102/0002831216634456
   Richardson JasonBruce Mitchell Juan Franco, 2019, SHIFTING NEIGHBORHOO, V0, P0
   Riggs W, 2016, LOCAL ENVIRON, V21, P527, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2014.982080
   Rothstein R, 2015, RACE SOC PROBL, V7, P21, DOI 10.1007/s12552-014-9134-1
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   Sharkey Patrick, 2013, STUCK IN PLACE: URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE END OF PROGRESS TOWARD RACIAL EQUALITY, V0, P0
   Singer ME, 2021, CITIES, V116, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103295
   Snidal M, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P3114, DOI 10.1177/00420980211070405
   Sohn DW, 2012, URBAN DES INT, V17, P115, DOI 10.1057/udi.2012.1
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   SQUIRES GD, 1991, URBAN AFF REV, V26, P567, DOI 10.1177/004208169102600407
   Talen E, 2014, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V24, P717, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2014.900102
   Turner J, 2017, DIGITAL COMMONS @ CAL POLY, V0, P0
   US Census Bureau, 2021, Q RES VAC HOM 2 Q 20, V0, P0
   US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2017, AFF FURTH FAIR HOUS, V0, P0
   US EPA, 2021, NATL WALK IND METH U, V0, P0
   van den Berg P, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V106, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.021
   Van Dyck D, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.05.005
   Walk Score, 2021, TRANS SCOR METH, V0, P0
   Walk Score, 2021, WALK SCOR METH, V0, P0
   Walks A, 2018, TRANSPORT POLICY, V65, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.01.001
   Wright R, 2014, PROF GEOGR, V66, P173, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2012.735924
   Yan X, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V80, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102255
   Yang YY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101747
   Yencha C, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V130, P689, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.053
   Yin L, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V76, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.024
   Zhu XM, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V34, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.024
   Zuniga-Teran AA, 2017, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V6, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2016.11.005
NR 95
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 2
U2 15
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD MAR 15
PY 2023
VL 60
IS 4
BP 638
EP 654
DI 10.1177/00420980221110829
EA AUG 2022
PG 17
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA 9C3VP
UT WOS:000840159200001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Basu, N
   Oviedo-Trespalacios, O
   King, M
   Kamruzzaman, M
   Haque, MM
AF Basu, Nandita
   Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar
   King, Mark
   Kamruzzaman, Md.
   Haque, Md. Mazharul
TI What do pedestrians consider when choosing a route? The role of safety, security, and attractiveness perceptions and the built environment during day and night walking
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Pedestrian route choice analysis; Stated preference modelling; Traffic psychology; Multinomial logit model; Human factors; Risk analysis
ID choice preferences; physical-activity; impact; walkability; quality; behavior; network; travel; crime; speed
AB Increasing the use of non-motorized modes of transport, such as walking, is a worldwide objective aimed at improving the sustainability of cities. However, pedestrians may not choose to walk if the infrastructure fails to meet their needs or if they hold unfavourable perceptions regarding the built environment (BE). The current study aims to identify the significance of route attributes and perceptions of attractiveness, safety, and security at the route level, which influence pedestrians' preferences for last-mile route choices. A cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing a questionnaire comprising a stated preference (SP) experiment and a perception survey. The study considered theory-informed attributes influencing pedestrian route choice preferences, including: (1) individual-level determinants, (2) physical-level determinants, and (3) time of day. Two separate models were developed, considering the time of day, to examine the differences in trade-offs within pedestrians' route choice preferences between day and night. The results revealed that both the BE and perceptions of the BE play a crucial role in determining pedestrian route choice behaviour. Pedestrians showed a preference for routes fully encompassed by mixed or residential land uses during the daytime. The presence of vacant land along the walking route significantly decreased the likelihood of choosing a route at night. Generally, pedestrians favoured shorter walking times, lower posted speed limits, and comfortable walkway grades in their routes. Female pedestrians tended to avoid routes that were not well-lit and pleasant at night. Lowering roadway speed limits emerged as a strategy to encourage walking in suburban areas. The findings of this study hold the potential to play an essential role in the development of effective policy initiatives targeted at pedestrians in cities.
C1 [Basu, Nandita; King, Mark; Haque, Md. Mazharul] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Brisbane, Australia.
   [Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Kamruzzaman, Md.] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Australia.
C3 Queensland University of Technology (QUT); Delft University of Technology; Monash University
RP Oviedo-Trespalacios, O (通讯作者)，Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands.
EM O.OviedoTrespalacios@tudelft.nl
FU Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Award [DE200101079]
CR Alonso F, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V22, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101145
   Arellana J, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P183, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
   Ariffin RNR, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V105, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.062
   Bafatakis C, 2015, TRANSP RES BOARD 94, V0, P0
   Basu N, 2022, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V87, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.006
   Basu N, 2022, TRANSPORT REV, V42, P672, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2021.2000064
   Basu N, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V23, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101243
   Beelaerts van Blokland R, 2008, DESIGNING STATED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF AIRPORT LOCATION ON AIR PASSENGERS TRAVEL CHOICE, V0, P0
   Borst HC, 2008, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V28, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.010
   Borst HC, 2009, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V29, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.002
   Bovy PietHL, 1990, ROUTE CHOICE. WAYFINDING IN TRANSPORT NETWORKS. STUDIES IN OPERATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE, V0, P0
   Brisbane City Council, 2020, STREET TREE MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS, V0, P0
   Broach J, 2015, TRANSP RES BOARD 94, V0, P0
   Clifton K, 2005, RESEARCH ON WOMENS ISSUES IN TRANSPORTATION: REPORT OF A CONFERENCE, V2, P79, DOI 10.17226/23299
   Craig CL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P36, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00472-5
   Curtis C, 2015, TRANSPORT POLICY, V42, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.003
   Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2018, QUEENSLAND HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY 2017-2018, V0, P0
   Dessing D, 2016, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-016-0373-y
   Evers C, 2014, J TRANSP HEALTH, V1, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2014.03.003
   Ferreira IA, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V150, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.009
   Ferrer S, 2015, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V33, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.014
   Foster C, 2004, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V58, P924, DOI 10.1136/jech.2003.014068
   Foster S, 2014, ENVIRON BEHAV, V46, P698, DOI 10.1177/0013916512465176
   Galama I, 2017, TRANSP RES BOARD 96, V0, P0
   Gårder PE, 2004, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V36, P533, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00059-9
   Garrard J, 2017, YOUNG PEOPLE AND WALKING IN VICTORIA: FULL REPORT, V0, P0
   Ghorveh MG, 2017, DOES STREET QUALITY AFFECT TRANSIT USERS ROUTE CHOICE?, V0, P0
   Giles-Corti B, 2002, PREV MED, V35, P601, DOI 10.1006/pmed.2002.1115
   Gim THT, 2017, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V40, P616, DOI 10.1177/0160017615626214
   Gotschi Thomas, 2017, CURR ENVIRON HEALTH REP, V4, P286, DOI 10.1007/s40572-017-0149-9
   Guo Z, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.013
   Hasan R, 2020, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V73, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.011
   Hayes AF, 2009, COMMUN MONOGR, V76, P408, DOI 10.1080/03637750903310360
   Hirt SA, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.009
   Hussain Q, 2019, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V129, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.033
   Johansson M, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P256, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1133225
   Joseph A, 2007, ENVIRON BEHAV, V39, P75, DOI 10.1177/0013916506295572
   Keizer K, 2008, SCIENCE, V322, P1681, DOI 10.1126/science.1161405
   Koh PP, 2013, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V36, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.001
   Lee S, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18137049
   Leyden KM, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1546, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
   Liang HW, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V140, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.016
   López-Lambas ME, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V22, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101133
   Louviere JJ, 2000, STATED CHOICE METHODS, V0, P0
   Maitra B, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000205
   Majumdar BB, 2017, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V143, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000380
   Meeder M, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V27, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.095
   Moura F, 2014, 7 ANN C CITTA CTR IN, V0, P0
   Munoz-Raskin R, 2010, TRANSPORT POLICY, V17, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.11.002
   Muraleetharan T, 2007, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP7, DOI 10.3141/2002-02
   NASAR JL, 1993, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V13, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2
   Osama A, 2017, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V107, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.001
   Oviedo-Trespalacios O, 2017, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V49, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2017.06.010
   Ozbil A, 2016, INT J DES CREAT INNO, V4, P67, DOI 10.1080/21650349.2015.1123120
   Panter J, 2014, PREV MED, V67, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.033
   Phillips J, 2013, GEOFORUM, V47, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.002
   Rankavat S, 2016, SAFETY SCI, V87, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.009
   Risová K, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V85, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102723
   Rod JE, 2023, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V116, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103590
   Rod JE, 2021, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V152, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105970
   Rodríguez DA, 2015, ENVIRON BEHAV, V47, P359, DOI 10.1177/0013916513520004
   Sener IN, 2009, TRANSPORTATION, V36, P511, DOI 10.1007/s11116-009-9201-4
   Sevtsuk A, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V25, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.010
   Shatu F, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V70, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.004
   Tilahun N, 2016, J TRANSP GEOGR, V54, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.021
   Tribby CP, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P1145, DOI 10.1177/0265813516659286
   Villaveces A, 2012, INJURY PREV, V18, P291, DOI 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040223
   Wickramasinghe V, 2015, TRANSP RES BOARD 94, V0, P0
   World Health Organization, 2003, RADIATION: EFFECTS OF ULTRAVIOLET (UV) RADIATION ON THE SKIN, V0, P0
   Yamamoto T, 2018, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V11, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.006
   Zapata-Diomedi B, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0184799
NR 71
TC 48
Z9 55
U1 12
U2 94
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC 15
PY 2023
VL 143
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104551
EA SEP 2023
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA X3FG1
UT WOS:001097338100001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Lotfata, A
   Tao, R
   Su, YF
AF Lotfata, Aynaz
   Tao, Ran
   Su, Yanfang
TI Evaluating the walking accessibility of Cook County's public schools to use as open space
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE Open space; public facilities; 20 min walking transit; dual use
ID neighborhood walkability; health; design; environment; area
AB This paper evaluates hypothesized dual uses of the public schools to increase walking accessibility to open spaces as a part of the permanent urban interventions. The Two-step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) method was adopted to measure the 20 min walking accessibility of the public schools in Cook County, the home of the Chicago Metropolitan. We further used the bivariate local Moran I to examine the potential inequality issues in the spatial distribution of the school sites within walking distance. The result reveals geographically varying walking access to public schools. The lowest walking access is predominant across Cook County, including historically racially discriminated areas. This study sets an example of managing the underuse of urban facilities to benefit the neighboring communities. In addition, it provides a snapshot of the relationship between urban planning and geography. Planning should overlap with geography when it examines the spaces of everyday life, spatial relationships among its different dimensions, and the processes that create them.
C1 [Lotfata, Aynaz] Chicago State Univ, Geog Dept, Chicago, IL 60628 USA.
   [Tao, Ran; Su, Yanfang] Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL USA.
C3 Chicago State University; State University System of Florida; University of South Florida
RP Lotfata, A (通讯作者)，Chicago State Univ, Geog Dept, Chicago, IL 60628 USA.
EM alotfata@csu.edu
CR Alexander D, 2002, PRINCIPLES OF EMERGENCY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, V0, P0
   Alves A, 2021, WATER SECURITY IN ASIA: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE, V0, P429
   Unknown -, 2019, GLOBAL ACTION PLAN ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 2018-2030: MORE ACTIVE PEOPLE FOR A HEALTHIER WORLD, V0, P0
   Anselin L, 2002, NEW TOOLS SPATIAL DA, V0, P0
   Anselin L, 2019, GEODA WORKBOOK, V0, P0
   Aquino K, 2022, ANN LEIS RES, V25, P472, DOI 10.1080/11745398.2020.1859391
   Arroyo R, 2021, INT J URBAN SCI, V25, P386, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2021.1925144
   Bartholomew JB, 2005, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V37, P2032, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000178101.78322.dd
   Bell AC, 2008, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V14, P77, DOI 10.1080/13504620701843426
   Bereitschaft B, 2019, URBAN SCI, V3, P0, DOI 10.3390/urbansci3010011
   Boldemann C, 2011, SCI SPORT, V26, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.scispo.2011.01.007
   BORNSTEIN MH, 1976, NATURE, V259, P557, DOI 10.1038/259557a0
   Breuste J, 2011, URBAN ECOSYST, V14, P313, DOI 10.1007/s11252-011-0186-3
   Capasso V, 2020, NPIAP NATL PRESSURE, V0, P13
   Colding J, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, P0, DOI 10.3390/land9050162
   Croucher K, 2007, HEALTH AND THE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN NEIGHBOURHOODS: A CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW, V0, P0
   Czembrowski P, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0212277
   Ding D, 2016, LANCET, V388, P1311, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X
   Dyment JE, 2009, CHILD GEOGR, V7, P261, DOI 10.1080/14733280903024423
   Gaskin DJ, 2012, MED CARE RES REV, V69, P158, DOI 10.1177/1077558711420263
   Ghafouri A, 2020, MANZAR, V12, P34, DOI 10.22034/manzar.2020.214183.2023
   Giles-Corti B, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
   Gunn LD, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0621-9
   Hansen R, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.042
   Hogendorf M, 2020, HEALTH PLACE, V61, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102264
   Honey-Rosés J, 2021, CITIES HEALTH, V5, PS263, DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074
   Ioja CL, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.002
   Ioja IC, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.001
   Kuai X, 2017, ANN GIS, V23, P103, DOI 10.1080/19475683.2017.1304448
   Kwadwo AG, 2022, HABITAT INT, V120, P0
   Latham A, 2019, GEOGR COMPASS, V13, P0, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12444
   Lehmann S, 2016, FUTURE CITIES ENV, V2, P1, DOI 10.1186/s40984-016-0021-3
   Loo BPY, 2017, INT J URBAN SCI, V21, P54, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2016.1235488
   Lotfata A, 2022, PALGRAVE ENCY URBAN, V0, P0
   Lovell ST, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y
   Low Setha, 2016, CITY, V20, P10, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1128679
   Lyles LW, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P792, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.768973
   MADANIPOUR ALI, 2020, HDB URBAN SEGREGATIO, V0, P170
   Mazereeuw M, 2017, J ARCHIT EDUC, V71, P65, DOI 10.1080/10464883.2017.1260928
   Moore RobinC, 1992, PLAY FOR ALL GUIDELINES: PLANNING, V0, P0
   Moos M, 2018, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V84, P7, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2017.1406315
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Nardone A, 2021, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V129, P0, DOI 10.1289/EHP7495
   Nardone A, 2020, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V13, P109, DOI 10.1089/env.2020.0011
   Nelson R, 2021, MAPPING INEQUALITY, V0, P0
   Orstad SL, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17134885
   Park SH, 2013, INT J URBAN SCI, V17, P142, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2013.776283
   Polzin P, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN B, V41, P717, DOI 10.1068/b120050p
   Porebska A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11102878
   Qiu JY, 2019, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, V0, PP7490, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8898226
   Riggs W, 2016, LOCAL ENVIRON, V21, P527, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2014.982080
   Saif MA, 2018, PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, V47, P36, DOI 10.3311/pptr.12072
   Seekamp E, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V162, P41, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02812-4
   Senik B, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P1587, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04367-0
   Shaaban K, 2018, INT J URBAN SCI, V22, P382, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2017.1403363
   Shoari N, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0241102
   Soltani A, 2014, INT J URBAN SCI, V18, P19, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2013.874546
   Sustainable Development Goals, 2020, SDG IND, V0, P0
   Tao R, 2020, ANN GIS, V26, P319, DOI 10.1080/19475683.2020.1833365
   Thompson CWard, 2007, OPEN SPACE PEOPLE SP, V0, P0
   U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2021, AD PHYS IN PREV MAPS, V0, P0
   U.S. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), 2020, 2015 LAND US INV NE, V0, P0
   U.S. Environmental protection agency (EPA), 2021, REUS REC OPP DEM, V0, P0
   van Broekhoven S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10061875
   van Vliet J, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P755, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0340-0
   Viola S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11174669
   WalletHub, 2022, 2022S BEST WORST CIT, V0, P0
   Wei YX, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101813
   WHO, 2020, MEDIUM, V0, P0
   Yap JBH, 2021, PLAN PRACT RES, V36, P314, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2021.1883249
   Yilmaz S, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P3672, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-10555-z
   Zaimi R, 2022, ENVIRON PLANN D, V40, P245, DOI 10.1177/02637758211013041
NR 74
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 17
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1226-5934
EI 2161-6779
J9 INT J URBAN SCI
JI Int. J. Urban Sci.
PD JAN 2
PY 2023
VL 27
IS 1
BP 1
EP 18
DI 10.1080/12265934.2022.2072940
EA MAY 2022
PG 18
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA 8V5DG
UT WOS:000790285600001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Palominos, N
   Smith, DA
AF Palominos, Nicolas
   Smith, Duncan A.
TI Examining the geometry of streets through accessibility: new insights from streetspace allocation analysis
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE street networks; urban form; streetspace allocation; street design; London
ID space; transport; impacts; transit; city
AB This paper describes streetspace allocation analysis, a method that uses street cross-sections to measure footway and carriageway widths and quantify a key parameter of street design citywide. The resulting network-based streetspace allocation metrics are employed on a proof-of-concept study of train station service areas in London, applying shortest-path analysis under a place and walking prioritisation approach. Overall, streetspace allocation statistics for London confirm the citywide predominance of space allocated for vehicular transport over pedestrian uses. A comparison of the current distribution and proposed re-allocation of streetspace on streets near stations allows for the investigation of the effects of streetspace enhancements, which tend to be beneficial in reducing pedestrian movement impedance and extending service areas. The methods presented here can offer valuable analytical capacity for developing new transit-oriented schemes and designing place-based streets that support sustainable transport and sustainable urban development.
C1 [Palominos, Nicolas; Smith, Duncan A.] UCL, Ctr Adv Spatial Anal, London, England.
   [Palominos, Nicolas] UCL, Ctr Adv Spatial Anal, 90 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 4TJ, England.
C3 University of London; University College London; University of London; University College London
RP Palominos, N (通讯作者)，UCL, Ctr Adv Spatial Anal, 90 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 4TJ, England.
EM n.palominos@ucl.ac.uk
CR Alexander C, 1977, PATTERN LANGUAGE, V0, P0
   Alexander Christopher, 1965, ARCHITECTURAL FORUM, V122, P58, DOI 10.4324/9780203094235-18/CITY-TREECHRISTOPHER-ALEXANDER
   Anderson S, 1978, ON STREETS, V0, P0
   Appleyard D, 1981, LIVABLE STREETS, V0, P0
   Barthelemy M, 2013, SCI REP-UK, V3, P0, DOI 10.1038/srep02153
   Batty M, 2001, ENVIRON PLANN B, V28, P321, DOI 10.1068/b2803ed
   Batty M, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1533, DOI 10.1177/2399808320972506
   Buchanan Colin, 1963, TRAFFIC IN TOWNS, V0, P0
   Carmona M, 2018, PROG PLANN, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2017.09.001
   Centre for London, 2017, STREET SMARTS REP CO, V0, P0
   Creutzig F, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P711, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2020.1762795
   De Gruyter C, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V101, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103339
   Directorate-General ECE, 2004, RECL CIT STREETS PEO, V0, P0
   Etten AV, 2019, PREPRINT, V0, P0
   EYTON JR, 1984, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V74, P477, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01469.x
   Gossling S, 2020, J URBAN DES, V25, P443, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2020.1727318
   Gössling S, 2016, TRANSPORT REV, V36, P659, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2016.1147101
   Groβbritannien, 2007, MAN STREETS, V0, P0
   Gutierrez J, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P480, DOI 10.1068/b33043
   Guzman LA, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V95, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102860
   Haklay M, 2010, CARTOGR J, V47, P315, DOI 10.1179/000870410X12911304958827
   Ibraeva A, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V132, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.018
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jones P, 2007, LINK AND PLACE: A GUIDE TO STREET PLANNING AND DESIGN, V0, P0
   Kenworthy JR, 2006, ENVIRON URBAN, V18, P67, DOI 10.1177/0956247806063947
   Kenworthy JR, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P279, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00023-6
   Kimmelman M, 2020, NEW YORK TIMES, V0, P0
   Kropf K, 2009, URBAN MORPHOL, V13, P105
   Lefebvre-Ropars G, 2021, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2675, P259, DOI 10.1177/0361198121995196
   Lefebvre-Ropars G, 2021, J TRANSP LAND USE, V14, P151, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2021.1808
   Marshall S, 2018, NETW SPAT ECON, V18, P735, DOI 10.1007/s11067-018-9427-9
   Masucci AP, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069469
   Mboup Gora, 2013, STREETS AS PUBLIC SPACES AND DRIVERS OF URBAN PROSPERITY, V0, P0
   Mobasheri A, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, P0, DOI 10.3390/s18020509
   Nello-Deakin S, 2019, J URBAN DES, V24, P698, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2019.1592664
   Palominos N, 2019, QUANTIFYING MAPPING, V0, P212
   Palominos N, 2021, THESIS UCL U COLL LO, V0, P0
   Palominos N, 2021, MAPPING COVID-19 IN SPACE AND TIME: UNDERSTANDING THE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF A GLOBAL PANDEMIC, V0, P191
   Rapoport A, 1987, PUBLIC STREETS FOR PUBLIC USE, V0, P0
   Reid C, 2020, FORBES, V0, P0
   Route Plan Roll, 2020, LOND CYCL MAP GOOGL, V0, P0
   RUEDA SALVADOR, 1997, LA CIUDAD COMPACTA Y DIVERSA FRENTE A LA CONURBANIZACION DIFUSA, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_8
   Sadik-Khan Janette, 2016, STREETFIGHT: HANDBOOK FOR AN URBAN REVOLUTION, V0, P0
   Scheer BC, 2016, URBAN MORPHOL, V20, P5
   Sevtsuk A, 2019, MATH URBAN MORPHOLOG, V0, PP537, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9-29
   Southworth M, 1997, STREETS SHAPING TOWN, V0, P0
   Szell M, 2018, URBAN PLAN, V3, P1, DOI 10.17645/up.v3i1.1209
   Transport for London, 2019, TRANSP LOND BUS PLAN, V0, P0
   Transport for London, 2019, STREETSC GUID, V0, P0
   Weber J, 2006, J TRANSP GEOGR, V14, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.06.005
   Zandiatashbar A, 2018, CITIES, V81, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.005
NR 51
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 0
U2 13
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 8
BP 2203
EP 2219
DI 10.1177/23998083221139849
EA NOV 2022
PG 17
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA W4GZ7
UT WOS:000889773700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Galán, A
   Ruiz-Apilánez, B
   Garcíia-Camacha, I
AF Galan, Alicia
   Ruiz-Apilanez, Borja
   Garcia-Camacha, Irene
TI Evaluating microscale walkability: a comparative analysis of street audits
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Walkability; Street audits; Urban design; Pedestrian mobility; Public space; Street design
ID built environment; physical-activity; walking; tool; reliability; validity; implementation; features; city
AB This study investigates the reliability of microscale walkability assessment by analysing the correspondence of the evaluations obtained using three different street-auditing tools, which are similar from a methodological perspective and regarding time consumption. The comparison of the evaluation of 1314 street segments-from a wide range of urban fabrics in Toledo, Spain-shows low consensus between the three audits. This research explores the reasons behind this and offers a comparative understanding of the examined tools. The paper describes their limitations, highlights the need for further research into the relationship between the streetscape and pedestrian mobility, and calls for more context-specific auditing tools.
C1 [Galan, Alicia; Ruiz-Apilanez, Borja] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Toledo Sch Architecture, Dept Civil Engn & Built Environm, Toledo, Spain.
   [Garcia-Camacha, Irene] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real Sch Civil Engn, Dept Math, Ciudad Real, Spain.
C3 Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha; Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
RP Ruiz-Apilánez, B (通讯作者)，Univ Castilla La Mancha, Toledo Sch Architecture, Dept Civil Engn & Built Environm, Toledo, Spain.
FU Spanish Government; Proyecto de I+D+I [PID2020-119360RB-100]
CR Alfonzo M, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P29, DOI 10.1080/13574800701803456
   Unknown -, 2022, WORLD CITIES REPORT 2022, V0, P0
   Ayuntamiento de Toledo, 2022, PREDIAGNOSTICO AGENDA URBANA TOLEDO, V0, P0
   Badland HM, 2010, J URBAN HEALTH, V87, P1007, DOI 10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x
   Bartzokas-Tsiompras A, 2021, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING, V16, P413, DOI 10.18280/ijsdp.160302
   Boarnet MG, 2011, ENVIRON BEHAV, V43, P735, DOI 10.1177/0013916510379760
   Brookfield K, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13111061
   Brownson RC, 2004, J PHYS ACTIVITY HLTH, V1, P189, DOI 10.1123/JPAH.1.3.191
   Brownson RC, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V36, PS99, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
   Cain KL, 2018, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V15, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-018-0650-z
   Cain KL, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V116, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042
   Chiang YC, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14060593
   Clifton KJ, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   Day K, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
   Emery J, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P38, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.38
   Erturan A, 2022, J URBAN DES, V27, P287, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2021.1988543
   Ewing Reid, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS223, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
   Ewing R, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P5, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15591585
   Fonseca F, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, P0, DOI 10.3390/su14159089
   Forsyth A, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800701816896
   Galanis A, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V48, P3143, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1280
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Giles-Corti B, 2016, LANCET, V388, P2912, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6
   Griew P, 2013, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-103
   Gullón P, 2015, J URBAN HEALTH, V92, P923, DOI 10.1007/s11524-015-9982-z
   Handy S, 1996, TRANSP RES REC, V1552, P135, DOI 10.1177/0361198196155200119
   Hasan MM, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V22, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101241
   Kelly CE, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1500, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.001
   Kelly C, 2014, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V2, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00052
   Kelly CM, 2013, ANN BEHAV MED, V45, PS108, DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9419-9
   LANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159, DOI 10.2307/2529310
   Lin L, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.002
   Macdonald E, 2018, J URBAN DES, V23, P71, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2017.1340092
   Millington C, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.007
   Molina-García J, 2020, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V17, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-020-01028-0
   Moudon AV, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P21, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21
   Pikora TJ, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P708, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000210189.64458.f3
   Pikora TJ, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
   Ruiz-Apilánez B, 2017, URBAN DES INT, V22, P267, DOI 10.1057/s41289-016-0036-2
   Saelens BE, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1552, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
   Sallis JF, 2015, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V12, P0, DOI 10.5888/pcd12.150098
   Sdoukopoulos A, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V24, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.102
   Shatu F, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V70, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.004
   Southworth Michael, 2008, JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1061/ASCE0733-94882005131:4246
   Steinmetz-Wood M, 2020, HEALTH PLACE, V66, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102462
   Steinmetz-Wood M, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7460-3
   Tran M-C, 2018, PLANUNG GESUNDHEITSF, V0, P284
   Ussery EN, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V12, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.11.007
   Vale DS, 2016, J TRANSP LAND USE, V9, P209, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.593
   Valenzuela-Montes Luis Miguel, 2015, FACTORES Y CONDICIONANTES. EURE, V41, P5, DOI 10.4067/s0250-71612015000300001
   WHO and UN-Habitat, 2020, INTEGRATING HEALTH IN URBAN AND TERRITORIAL PLANING: A SOURCEBOOK, V0, P0
   Xu Z, 2020, LANDSC ARCHIT FRONT, V8, P52, DOI 10.15302/J-LAF-1-020025
NR 55
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 31
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD NOV 22
PY 2023
VL 0
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1057/s41289-023-00233-0
EA NOV 2023
PG 15
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA Y6AI8
UT WOS:001106060900001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Li, MS
   Xue, F
   Yeh, AGO
AF Li, Maosu
   Xue, Fan
   Yeh, Anthony G. O.
TI Bi-objective analytics of 3D visual-physical nature exposures in high-rise high-density cities for landscape and urban planning
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Nature exposure; Window view; Walkability; Pareto optimality; 3D GIS; High-rise high-density cities
ID green space; environmental justice; view; health; window
AB Urban dwellers enjoy nature exposure in the neighborhood built environment through visual and physical ways, such as window views and outdoor activities. However, existing studies and analytics examine these pathways separately, leading to underinformed urban planning practices such as difficult prioritizing urban areas with both low-level nature exposures. The underinformation problem is particularly severe for high-rise, high-density cities that embrace high-level vertical diversity. This study aims to propose bi-objective analytics of 3D visual-physical nature exposures, for holistic - rather than separated - assessments. First, a floor-level Nature Exposure Index (NEI) is defined with visual and physical components. The visual component NEIv is assessed by window view imagery and deep transfer learning, while the physical component NEIp reflects the mean time from the floor to the nearest natural sites (e.g., nature parks and seaside) through the 3D pedestrian network. Then, bi-objective optimization-based analytics is designed for (i) identifying buildings and blocks with holistically low-level visual-physical nature exposures using NEI and (ii) examining probabilistic outputs and robustness of linear weighting schemes. A case study of 519 buildings showed that the NEI-enabled bi-objective analytics is automatic, effective, and inexpensive. Interviews with field experts confirmed that the analytics provides comprehensive evidence for a holistic identification of high-rise, high-density areas in need of nature exposure for landscape management and urban planning.
C1 [Li, Maosu; Yeh, Anthony G. O.] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Xue, Fan] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Hong Kong; University of Hong Kong
RP Xue, F (通讯作者)，Univ Hong Kong, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM maosulee@connect.hku.hk; xuef@hku.hk; hdxugoy@hku.hk
FU Hong Kong Research Grant Council (RGC) [T22-504/21-R]; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Laboratory for Smart Cities of the 2020 Guangdong New Innovative Strategic Research Fund, Guangdong Science and Technology Department;  [27200520];  [2020B1212030009]
CR Andersen M, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V91, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.014
   Unknown -, 2018, CENTC 169, V0, P0
   Chen B, 2022, ENVIRON INT, V166, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107348
   Choguill CL, 2008, HABITAT INT, V32, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.06.007
   CIBSE, 2014, LIGHT GUID 10 DAYL G, V0, P0
   Coppel G, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V167, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.015
   Cox DTC, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V160, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.006
   Fan PL, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V165, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.007
   Fisher-Gewirtzman D, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V45, P345, DOI 10.1177/0265813516676486
   Hartig T, 2014, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V35, P207, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
   He DS, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104502
   He DS, 2022, CITIES, V124, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103607
   Helbich M, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V126, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.013
   HKBA, 2011, COD PRACT BUILD WORK, V0, P0
   HKEMSD, 2021, PART US PERM LIFTS, V0, P0
   HKHAD, 2021, DAT PRIV BUILD HONG, V0, P0
   HKLandsD, 2014, B1000 DIG TOP MAP, V0, P0
   HKLandsD, 2021, 3D PED NETW, V0, P0
   HKLWB, 2006, PUBL CONS REV DES MA, V0, P0
   HKPlanD, 2019, 3D PHOTO REAL MOD, V0, P0
   HKTPB, 2010, GUID SUBM VIS IMP AS, V0, P0
   Huang B, 2008, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V22, P507, DOI 10.1080/13658810701492365
   Jiang B, 2021, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V77, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101659
   Jiang B, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V132, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.005
   Kaplan R, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P507, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973115
   Keniger LE, 2013, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V10, P913, DOI 10.3390/ijerph10030913
   Kuo FE, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P343, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973025
   Labib SM, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V789, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147919
   Laovisutthichai V, 2021, P 38 INT S AUTOMATIO, V0, PP65, DOI 10.22260/ISARC2021/0011
   Li M, 2021, P 25 INT S ADV CONST, V0, PP1339, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-3587-8_91
   Li MS, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104505
   Lottrup L, 2015, LANDSCAPE RES, V40, P57, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2013.829806
   Lwin KK, 2011, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V35, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.002
   Mackenzie Craig Owen, 2019, TERTIARY BUILDING BLOCKS FOR PROTEIN DESIGN AND STRUCTURE GENERATION, V0, P0
   Malczewski J, 2015, MULTICRITERIA DECISI, V1, P0
   Malczewski J, 2006, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V20, P703, DOI 10.1080/13658810600661508
   Oh K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V82, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.014
   Park Y, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V200, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103806
   Planning Department, 2018, HONG KONG PLANNING STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, V0, P0
   Rahman MM, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103214
   Raymond CM, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V153, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.005
   Sun GB, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P60, DOI 10.1177/2399808319847204
   Tang BS, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1340, DOI 10.1177/2399808320932575
   Tara A, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103930
   Tobler W, 1993, NCGIA TECHNICAL REPORTS, V0, P0
   ULRICH RS, 1984, SCIENCE, V224, P420, DOI 10.1126/science.6143402
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Xia C, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P141, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.1919502
   Xue F, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10080561
   Xue F, 2021, ADV ENG INFORM, V47, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101245
   Yang LC, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V94, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103099
   Ye Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.028
   Zhao JT, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2418, DOI 10.1177/2399808320977871
NR 53
TC 21
Z9 23
U1 12
U2 88
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD MAY 15
PY 2023
VL 233
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104714
EA FEB 2023
PG 12
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 9S9QR
UT WOS:000946670500001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Hess, P
   Piper, M
   Sorensen, A
AF Hess, Paul
   Piper, Michael
   Sorensen, Andre
TI Can We Retrofit Suburban Arterials? Analyzing the Walkability and Retrofit Potential of Four Toronto Region Corridors
SO JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
LA English
DT Article
DE retrofitting sprawl; suburban corridors; suburban form; walkability
ID smart growth; urbanism; form; experience; struggle; compact
AB Problem, research strategy, and findings The multilane arterial roadway is a central feature of post-World War II (WWII) suburbs that challenges efforts to create more transit-oriented regions. Retrofitting suburbs is an important planning goal, but research examining the urban form of arterials and their potential for transformation has been scarce. We analyzed four suburban corridors in the Toronto (Canada) region developed during different periods of suburbanization. We found that the walkability of corridors declined as modernist planning ideas were more fully implemented, and then walkability increased as new urbanist ideas began to influence planning in the 1990s. Over time, however, the retrofit potential declined across all corridors studied, with patterns of lots and development becoming ever more static. Understanding these patterns is important to developing successful strategies for retrofitting suburban arterials. Takeaway for practice Arterial roadway corridors present potential to bring transit-oriented, walkable urban places near large areas of automobile-dependent suburbs and should be a primary focus for retrofitting research and practice. We present here a set of metrics that rely on readily available data, are not complex to carry out, and produce mapping and visualization that is legible and allows comparison across corridors. We suggest that local governments should be routinely studying and evaluating the potential for retrofit and intensification of all such corridors within their jurisdiction. Planners should seek to develop approaches to managing future corridor development to permit greater adaptability in response to future economic, transportation, and climate changes and vulnerabilities.
C1 [Hess, Paul] Univ Toronto, Dept Geog & Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   [Piper, Michael] Univ Toronto, John H Daniels Fac Architecture Landscape & Desig, Urban Design Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   [Sorensen, Andre] Univ Toronto Scarborough, Dept Human Geog, Scarborough, ON, Canada.
C3 University of Toronto; University of Toronto; University of Toronto; University Toronto Scarborough
RP Hess, P (通讯作者)，Univ Toronto, Dept Geog & Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada.
EM hess@geog.utoronto.ca; Michael.Piper@daniels.utoronto.ca; andre.sorensen@utoronto.ca
CR Unknown -, 1959, OFF PLAN METR TOR PL, V0, P0
   Appleyard B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP20, DOI 10.3141/2671-03
   Boarnet MG, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P129, DOI 10.1177/0042098010364859
   City of Mississauga City of Brampton & MMM Group, 2010, HUR MAIN STREET CORR, V0, P541
   City of Toronto, 2017, MIDR BUILD, V0, P0
   Don Mills Developments Limited, 1969, ER MILLS NEW TOWN, V0, P0
   Dovey K, 2017, URBAN POLICY RES, V35, P261, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2016.1252324
   Downs A, 2005, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V71, P367, DOI 10.1080/01944360508976707
   Dunham-Jones Ellen, 2009, RETROFITTING SUBURBI, V0, P0
   Ewing R, 2013, METR PLANN DES, V0, PP1, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9_1
   Filion P, 2012, URBAN MORPHOL, V16, P101
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Grant J, 2002, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V68, P71, DOI 10.1080/01944360208977192
   Grant JL, 2009, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V10, P11, DOI 10.1080/14649350802661683
   Gregg K, 2019, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V13, P407, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2018.1476995
   Harris R, 1996, UNPLANNED SUBURBS: TORONTOS AMERICAN TRAGEDY 1900 TO 1950, V0, P0
   Hebbert M, 2005, J URBAN DES, V10, P39, DOI 10.1080/13574800500062361
   Hess PM, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451049
   Hess PM, 2015, URBAN GEOGR, V36, P127, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2014.947859
   Houston D, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P938, DOI 10.1177/0042098014529344
   Knaap G, 2005, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V28, P107, DOI 10.1177/0160017604273621
   Lauwers B, 2012, PEDESTRIAN DEATH REV, V0, P66
   Maghelal Praveen K, 2011, URISA JOURNAL, V23, P5
   Mississauga Planning Department, 1976, OFF PLAN CIT MISS PL, V0, P0
   MOUDON AnneVernez, 1998, PETRUCCIOLI, V0, P141
   Planning Partnership, 1999, TOWN MARKH CORN COMM, V0, P0
   Porter JM, 2019, J TRANSP LAND USE, V12, P619, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2019.1512
   Scheer BC, 2010, THE EVOLUTION OF URBAN FORM: TYPOLOGY FOR PLANNERS AND ARCHITECTS, V0, P0
   Scheer BC, 2015, RETROFITTING SPRAWL: ADDRESSING SEVENTY YEARS OF FAILED URBAN FORM, V0, P31
   Schlossberg M, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP34, DOI 10.3141/1887-05
   Sewell J, 1993, SHAPE OF THE CITY: TORONTO STRUGGLES WITH MODERN PLANNING, V0, P0
   Sorensen A, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P411, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.26
   SOUTHWORTH M, 1993, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V59, P271, DOI 10.1080/01944369308975880
   Statistics Canada, 2016, POP DAT DISS BLOCK, V0, P0
   Tachieva Galina, 2010, SPRAWL REPAIR MANUAL, V0, P0
   Talen E, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P175, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2013.772883
   Taylor Z, 2008, SHAPING THE TORONTO REGION, V0, Present
   Tefft BC, 2013, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V50, P871, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.022
   Tolentino Tolentino AA, 2011, SUBURBAN TISSUE ANALYSIS RETROFITABILITY: CREATING A CATALOGUE AND SCORING SYSTEM FOR POTENTIAL RETROFIT SITES, V0, P0
   Wheeler S, 2003, LOCAL ENVIRON, V8, P317, DOI 10.1080/13549830306656
   White Richard, 2016, PLANNING TORONTO: THE PLANNERS, V0, P0
   Williams G, 1999, PROG PLANN, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0305-9006(99)90003-X
   Williamson J, 2015, RETROFITTING SPRAWL: ADDRESSING SEVENTY YEARS OF FAILED URBAN FORM, V0, P103
   Xu JL, 2017, J URBAN DES, V22, P812, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2017.1337494
NR 44
TC 1
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 22
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0194-4363
EI 1939-0130
J9 J AM PLANN ASSOC
JI J. Am. Plan. Assoc.
PD JAN 2
PY 2023
VL 89
IS 1
BP 16
EP 30
DI 10.1080/01944363.2022.2033637
EA JUN 2022
PG 15
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 9C2XP
UT WOS:000815417600001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Heroy, S
   Loaiza, I
   Pentland, A
   O'Clery, N
AF Heroy, Samuel
   Loaiza, Isabella
   Pentland, Alex
   O'Clery, Neave
TI Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but predominantly for the wealthy
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban mobility; spatial inequity; transport and the built environment; travel behaviour; neighbourhood amenities
ID sample selection bias; built environment; compact development; mixed-use; travel; accessibility; bogota; location; system; city
AB Cities are home to a vast array of amenities, from local barbers to science museums and shopping malls. But these are unequally distributed across urban space. Using Google Places data combined with trip-based mobility data for Bogota, Colombia, we shed light on the impact of neighbourhood amenities on urban mobility patterns. By deriving a new accessibility metric that explicitly takes into account spatial range, we find that a higher density of local amenities is associated with a higher likelihood of walking as well as shorter bus and car trips. Digging deeper, we use an effect modification framework to show that this relationship varies by socioeconomic status. Our main focus is walking and driving, finding that amenities within about a 1-km radius from home are robustly associated with a higher propensity to walk and shorter driving time only for the wealthiest group. These results suggest that wealthier groups may weigh the proximity of local amenities more heavily into travel decisions, perhaps based on differentiated time-money trade-offs. As cities globally aim to boost public transport and green travel, these findings enable us to better understand how commercial structure shapes urban mobility in highly income-segregated settings.
C1 [Heroy, Samuel] Fed Reserve Bank Richmond, Quantitat Supervis & Res, Charlotte, NC 28202 USA.
   [Heroy, Samuel; O'Clery, Neave] UCL, Bartlett Ctr Adv Spatial Anal, London, England.
   [Heroy, Samuel; O'Clery, Neave] Univ Oxford, Math Inst, Oxford, England.
   [Loaiza, Isabella; Pentland, Alex] MIT, MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA USA.
C3 Federal Reserve System - USA; Federal Reserve Bank - Richmond; University of London; University College London; University of Oxford; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
RP Heroy, S (通讯作者)，Fed Reserve Bank Richmond, Quantitat Supervis & Res, Charlotte, NC 28202 USA.
EM samuel.heroy@rich.frb.org
FU GCRF [ES/P011055/1] Funding Source: UKRI
CR Adler V, 2018, HOUSING WHATS NEXT T, V0, P0
   Advisors H, 2021, MONTG COUNT MIX US D, V0, P0
   Agrawal AW, 2007, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V12, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.005
   Amcoff J, 2016, SOCIALVETENSKAPLIG TIDSKRIFT, V19, P0, DOI 10.3384/svt.2012.19.2.2450
   Anguelovski I, 2019, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V43, P133, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12725
   Arellana J, 2020, TRANSPORT REV, V40, P183, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
   Ashik FR, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2019.11.004
   Bank TW,, 2015, MAST PLANN, V0, P0
   Barbosa H, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-87407-4
   Boarnet MG, 2001, TRAVEL DESIGN INFLUE, V0, P0
   Bogot┬u├ y municipios vecino, 2020, TRAFF IND 2020, V0, P0
   Bogot┬u├ y municipios vecino, 2019, RES ENC MOV BOG, V0, P0
   Cantillo-García Victor, 2019, DYNA REV.FAC.NAC.MINAS, V86, P258, DOI 10.15446/dyna.v86n211.81821
   Carlino GA, 2019, J REGIONAL SCI, V59, P369, DOI 10.1111/jors.12438
   Cherednichenko S, 2021, BEST MAP API LOCATIO, V0, P0
   Chong SK, 2020, EPJ DATA SCI, V9, P0, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00234-x
   Cooke TJ, 1999, URBAN STUD, V36, P1597, DOI 10.1080/0042098992944
   Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estad┬u┬istica (DANE), 2020, CENS NAC POBL VIV, V0, P0
   Department for Levelling Up HC, 2021, BUILD BACK BETT HIGH, V0, P0
   Duch┬u┬┐ne C, 2011, GENDER TRANSPORT, V0, P0
   Duranton G, 2016, J REGIONAL SCI, V56, P210, DOI 10.1111/jors.12239
   Elldér E, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P120, DOI 10.1177/0042098020951001
   Elldér E, 2020, J PLAN EDUC RES, V40, P432, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18774120
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Ewing R, 1997, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V63, P107, DOI 10.1080/01944369708975728
   Ewing R, 2018, CITIES, V72, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.010
   Ewing R, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P19, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1245112
   Ewing R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P2330, DOI 10.1177/0042098014560991
   Freemark Y, 2018, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V28, P1004, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2018.1506813
   Glaeser EdwardL, 2001, J ECON GEOGR, V1, P27, DOI 10.1093/JEG/1.1.27
   Grant J, 2002, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V68, P71, DOI 10.1080/01944360208977192
   Guzman LA, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V24, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008
   Guzman LA, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10113958
   Guzman LA, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V25, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.345
   Guzman LA, 2017, J TRANSP GEOGR, V58, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016
   Guzman LA, 2017, CITIES, V60, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.004
   Handy S, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002
   Handy S, 2018, TRANSPORT REV, V0, P0
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Handy S, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P26, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1246379
   Handy Susan, 1993, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, V1400, P58
   Haugen K, 2013, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V49, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.001
   HECKMAN JJ, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P153, DOI 10.2307/1912352
   Hidalgo CA, 2020, HABITAT INT, V106, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102205
   Hidalgo D, 2013, RES TRANSP ECON, V39, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.005
   Hunter RF, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-23937-9
   Koschinsky J, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P343, DOI 10.1177/0265813515625641
   Kramer MG, 2013, OUR BUILT NATURAL EN, V0, P0
   Li YL, 2021, APPL SPAT ANAL POLIC, V14, P947, DOI 10.1007/s12061-021-09387-2
   Marquet O, 2017, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V11, P186, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2016.1230804
   Medina C, 2008, BORRADORES DE ECONOMIA, V0, P0
   Molina M, 2014, CIENCIA ACAD MEXICAN, V65, P10
   Moloney A, 2015, REUTERS, V0, P0
   Mondschein A, 2021, J PLAN EDUC RES, V41, P445, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18796652
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Moss L, 2015, MEDELLINS PARQUES RI, V0, P0
   Naess P, 1995, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V38, P349, DOI 10.1080/09640569512913
   Næss P, 2014, J TRANSP LAND USE, V7, P57, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.491
   Næss P, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P627, DOI 10.1080/00420980500534677
   Nyerges T, 2011, SAGE HDB GIS SOC, V0, P0
   Öner Ö, 2017, SPAT ECON ANAL, V12, P72, DOI 10.1080/17421772.2017.1265663
   Ortego S, 2015, GUARDIAN, V0, P0
   Bocarejo JP, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V10, P308, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2014.926435
   Paul P, 2015, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V12, PS62, DOI 10.1123/jpah.2013-0519
   Quastel N, 2012, URBAN GEOGR, V33, P1055, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.33.7.1055
   Rauterkus SY, 2011, J SUSTAINABLE REAL E, V3, P23, DOI 10.1080/10835547.2011.12091815
   Safegraph, 2021, GUID POINTS INT DAT, V0, P0
   Schwanen T, 2002, ENVIRON PLANN A, V34, P1487, DOI 10.1068/a34159
   Sharkey JR, 2009, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-8-9
   Small ML, 2021, NAT HUM BEHAV, V5, P1622, DOI 10.1038/s41562-021-01153-1
   Stevens MR, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P7, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044
   Straulino D, 2021, ARXIV, V0, P0
   Vall┬u┬e J, 2021, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P1
   Willsher K, 2020, GUARDIAN, V0, P0
   Xia ZL, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10113879
   Yañez-Pagans P, 2019, LAT AM ECON REV, V28, P0, DOI 10.1186/s40503-019-0079-z
   Yeung P, 2021, BBC, V0, P0
NR 77
TC 20
Z9 20
U1 7
U2 25
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD MAY 15
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 4
BP 958
EP 982
DI 10.1177/23998083221141439
EA NOV 2022
PG 25
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA I6YU0
UT WOS:000890581700001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Tabatabaie, S
   Litt, JS
   Muller, BHF
AF Tabatabaie, Sara
   Litt, Jill S.
   Muller, Brian H. F.
TI Sidewalks, trees and shade matter: A visual landscape assessment approach to understanding people's preferences for walking
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Walking; Urban greenness; Equity planning; Streetscape design; Visual landscape assessment; Participatory evaluation method; Health behaviors
ID built environment; physical-activity; recreational walking; urban green; neighborhood; attributes; quality; associations; perception; proximity
AB Introduction: Public health professionals and urban designers consider neighborhood sidewalks as a vehicle for promoting outdoor physical activity. The design of streetscape and available greenness may also influence walking behaviors and physical activity more generally. Method: Data collection included a visual landscape assessment (VLA) survey, followed by focus groups to evaluate streetscape features that influence participants' preferences for and choice of walking routes. With the considerations of equity in access to the environmental amenities, the study was conducted in marginalized communities. Sixty-nine people from low-income neighborhoods in Denver, CO participated in this study. Data were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively, using multilevel statistical models. Results: More shade and trees, higher levels of maintenance, and the presence of a buffer between the street and sidewalk increase the likelihood of intuitively choosing a street for walking. The availability of natural surveillance, the presence of an open view, and the presence of attractive buildings increase the likelihood of cognitively choosing a street for walking. Conclusion: People's preferences for and choice of walking routes, which include desired shade and walkability, should be considered in neighborhood planning to promote walkable environments.
C1 [Tabatabaie, Sara; Muller, Brian H. F.] Univ Colorado Boulder, Program Environm Design, Boulder, CO USA.
   [Litt, Jill S.] Univ Colorado Boulder, Environm Studies Program, Boulder, CO USA.
   [Tabatabaie, Sara] 1313 Steel St,Apt 503, Denver, CO 80206 USA.
C3 University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder; University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder
RP Tabatabaie, S (通讯作者)，1313 Steel St,Apt 503, Denver, CO 80206 USA.
EM sara.tabatabaie@colorado.edu
CR Adams SA, 2005, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V161, P389, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwi054
   AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Ball K, 2001, PREV MED, V33, P434, DOI 10.1006/pmed.2001.0912
   Blacksher E, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.019
   Bock C, 2014, J SCI MED SPORT, V17, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.04.009
   Cao XY, 2006, TRANSPORTATION, V33, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11116-005-7027-2
   Cassatella C, 2011, LANDSCAPE INDICATORS: ASSESSING AND MONITORING LANDSCAPE QUALITY, V0, PP105, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0366-7_6
   Cerin E, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P1682, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d
   Chan ETH, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P431, DOI 10.1007/s11116-019-10062-2
   Coeterier JF, 1996, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V34, P27, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(95)00204-9
   Daniel TC, 2001, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V54, P267, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
   Day K, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
   Dwyer Mark C, 1999, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V25, P102
   Elmendorf William, 2008, ARBORICULTURE & URBAN FORESTRY, V34, P152
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Fayers PM, 2002, LANCET, V359, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07466-4
   Foster S, 2011, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V31, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.005
   Gobster PH, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103635
   Haber R, 2012, COMMUNITY PLANNING H, V0, P0
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Hilbert DR, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126645
   Horlings LG, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su131911006
   Kaczynski AT, 2009, LEISURE SCI, V31, P174, DOI 10.1080/01490400802686045
   Kremers SPJ, 2006, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V3, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-3-9
   Lovasi GS, 2011, J URBAN HEALTH, V88, P1143, DOI 10.1007/s11524-011-9604-3
   Marselle MR, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V150, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420
   Mehta V, 2008, J URBANISM INT RES P, V1, P217, DOI 10.1080/17549170802529480
   Millstein RA, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-403
   Nasar JL, 2016, DIRECTIONS IN PERSON-ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE (ROUTLEDGE REVIVALS), V0, PP229, DOI 10.4324/9781315542553
   Nasar Jack L, 1988, ENVIRONMENTAL AESTHETICS: THEORY, V0, P260
   Nesbitt L, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.009
   Pikora T, 2003, SOC SCI MED, V56, P1693, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6
   Polat AT, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P573, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.009
   Ramirez LKB, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V31, P515, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.026
   Rodríguez DA, 2009, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V14, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2009.06.001
   Rogge E, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V82, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006
   Root ED, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V168, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.028
   Saelens BE, 2003, ANN BEHAV MED, V25, P80, DOI 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   Sallis JF, 2009, SOC SCI MED, V68, P1285, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.017
   Sarkar C, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.013
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Sugiyama T, 2015, J URBAN HEALTH, V92, P253, DOI 10.1007/s11524-014-9932-1
   Sugiyama T, 2010, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V100, P1752, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.182006
   Van Holle V, 2014, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V69, P432, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.009
   Vaughan KB, 2013, ANN BEHAV MED, V45, PS28, DOI 10.1007/s12160-012-9425-y
   Wood L, 2008, HEALTH PLACE, V14, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.04.004
   Xiang Y, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126961
   Zhu PY, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V84, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.005
   Zijlema WL, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V47, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126523
NR 50
TC 41
Z9 47
U1 11
U2 129
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 84
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127931
EA APR 2023
PG 9
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban Studies
GA F6PH9
UT WOS:000983540400001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Masini, E
   Tomao, A
   Corona, P
   Fattorini, L
   Giuliarelli, D
   Portoghesi, L
   Agrimi, M
AF Masini, Emanuela
   Tomao, Antonio
   Corona, Piermaria
   Fattorini, Lorenzo
   Giuliarelli, Diego
   Portoghesi, Luigi
   Agrimi, Mariagrazia
TI The ecosystem disservices of trees on sidewalks: A study based on a municipality urban tree inventory in Central Italy
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban forest; Green infrastructure; Street trees; Stratified random sampling; Ecosystem services
ID north-america; green areas; benefits; services; forests; preferences; landscapes; perception; attitudes; removal
AB Urban green infrastructure, including street trees, plays a key role in providing ecosystem services to urban residents. However, to fully understand the effective role of trees in the urban context, it is also necessary to evaluate the disservices that they can produce in the development of their functions if not managed in an adequate and integrated way. This contribution aims to demonstrate an approach to assess three disservices (pavement damage, aesthetic damage, likelihood of tree failure) of street trees at the municipal level, starting from the existing municipal tree inventory. In this case study, from the street tree population, a sample of approximately 5% of the trees was drawn by stratified random sampling, where the strata were composed of groups of tree species. In particular, a sampling scheme is adapted in which the probability to select a tree in the sample is greater for bigger trees, under the assumption that the bigger the trees the greater are the disservices caused. In this way, a greater precision of the estimates of the considered disservices for the population of urban trees is expected. The results show a high variability of disservices provision among species groups. The results also confirmed a positive correlation between the considered disservices and tree diameter at breast height, while other tree attributes such as total height and crown diameter were found to be positively related only to pavement damages. Finally, severe pruning can lead to a high level of the aesthetic and functional disservices even for shorter and younger street trees.
C1 [Masini, Emanuela; Corona, Piermaria; Giuliarelli, Diego; Portoghesi, Luigi; Agrimi, Mariagrazia] Univ Tuscia, Dept Innovat Biol Agrofood & Forest Syst, via San Camillo Lellis snc, Viterbo 01100, Italy.
   [Tomao, Antonio; Corona, Piermaria] Council Agr Res & Econ, Res Ctr Forestry & Wood, Viale S Margherita 80, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy.
   [Tomao, Antonio] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
   [Fattorini, Lorenzo] Univ Siena, Dept Econ & Stat, Siena, Italy.
C3 Tuscia University; Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria (CREA); University of Udine; University of Siena
RP Tomao, A (通讯作者)，Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy.
EM antonio.tomao@uniud.it
FU MIUR;  [PRIN 20173RRN2S]
CR Andersson E, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
   ARPALAZIO, 2023, CHEMICAL DATA, V0, P0
   Asciuto A, 2015, JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE (PRAGUE), V61, P55, DOI 10.17221/86/2014-jfs
   Avolio ML, 2015, URBAN ECOSYST, V18, P73, DOI 10.1007/s11252-014-0388-6
   Baines O, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V50, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126653
   Barbierato E, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs12020329
   Bertram C, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.011
   Brown JA, 2020, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V8, P0, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.569730
   Calfapietra C, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V183, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.012
   Caneva G, 2020, REND LINCEI-SCI FIS, V31, P411, DOI 10.1007/s12210-020-00907-9
   Cannizzaro S, 2014, GEOPROGRESS JOURNAL, V1, P29
   Cariñanos P, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16081357
   Cariñanos P, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V155, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.015
   Cariñanos P, 2016, J ENVIRON QUAL, V45, P244, DOI 10.2134/jeq2015.02.0075
   Carrus G, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022
   Ciaffi M, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V69, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127506
   Ciaffi M, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.022
   Corona Piermaria, 2018, ANNALS OF SILVICULTURAL RESEARCH, V42, P1, DOI 10.12899/asr-1617
   Delshammar Tim, 2015, ARBORICULTURE & URBAN FORESTRY, V41, P187, DOI 10.48044/jauf.2015.018
   Dickinson DC, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V25, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.014
   Dobbs C, 2019, URBAN ECOSYST, V22, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3
   Escobedo FJ, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.002
   FAO, 2016, GUIDELINES ON URBAN AND PERI-URBAN FORESTRY, V0, P0
   Fares S, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P14910, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c04740
   Fares S, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V682, P494, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.109
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Hedayat A, 1991, DESIGN INFERENCE FIN, V0, P0
   Jahani A, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P955, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1665-3
   Jim CY, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.06.003
   Kane Brian, 2008, URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, V7, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.11.001
   Keller Julie Kjeldsen-Kragh, 2012, ARBORICULTURE & URBAN FORESTRY, V38, P24
   Kirkpatrick JB, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.015
   Klein RW, 2020, FORESTS, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/f11050485
   Koyata H, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126898
   Lafortezza R, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.003
   Larsen L, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P374
   Lazio region, 2018, LAND USE MAP OF LAZIO REGION, V0, P0
   Li W, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V133, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.013
   Li X, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/rs11101144
   Livesley SJ, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.09.001
   Lyytimäki J, 2017, DOI 10.4324/9781315627106.CH12, V0, P0
   Lyytimäki J, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.008
   Ma BQ, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V60, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127087
   Maes J, 2017, CONSERV LETT, V10, P121, DOI 10.1111/conl.12216
   Mattheck Claus, 1994, ARBORICULTURAL JOURNAL, V18, P1
   Mundher R, 2022, URBAN SCI, V6, P0, DOI 10.3390/urbansci6040079
   Mundher R, 2022, FORESTS, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/f13070991
   National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), 2022, MAIN DATABASE, V0, P0
   Nesbitt L, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V25, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.005
   Nowak David J, 2006, URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, V5, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007
   Ordonez-Barona C, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104466
   Östberg J, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P467, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0732-3
   Ostoic SK, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V31, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.005
   Pace R, 2021, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V65, P277, DOI 10.1007/s00484-020-02030-8
   Peel MC, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1633, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
   Pokorny JD, 1992, URBAN TREE RISK MANAGEMENT: A COMMUNITY GUIDE TO PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, V0, P1
   Portoghesi L, 2023, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V6, P0, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1155016
   Prigioniero A, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, P0, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-20992-0
   Quatrini V, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.015
   Rogers K, 2017, FUTURE CITY, V7, P283, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50280-9_21
   Roman LA, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P615, DOI 10.1007/s13280-020-01396-8
   Rossi L, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, P0, DOI 10.3390/su14031684
   Salmond JA, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V15, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12940-016-0103-6
   SAMPFORD MR, 1967, BIOMETRIKA, V54, P499, DOI 10.1093/biomet/54.3-4.499
   Sanders Jessica, 2013, ARBORICULTURE & URBAN FORESTRY, V39, P68
   Sang ÅO, 2021, URBAN ECOSYST, V24, P1343, DOI 10.1007/s11252-021-01113-7
   Shackleton CM, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS, V19, P587, DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9952-z
   Shackleton S, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V136, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.004
   Sjöman H, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.09.004
   SMARDON RC, 1988, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V15, P85, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90018-7
   Smiley T, 2012, 2012 INT SOC ARBORIC, V0, P0
   Smith IA, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0215846
   Speak AF, 2022, URBAN ECOSYST, V25, P355, DOI 10.1007/s11252-021-01158-8
   Speak A, 2021, J PLACE MANAG DEV, V14, P497, DOI 10.1108/JPMD-08-2020-0079
   Speak A, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V197, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103748
   Speak A, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V95, P544, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.048
   Suchocka M, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0256465
   Tabacchi G, 2011, EUR J FOREST RES, V130, P911, DOI 10.1007/s10342-011-0481-9
   Terho Minna, 2005, URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2004.07.002
   Theodorou A, 2022, FRONT PSYCHOL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816217
   Tian YQ, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V260, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110140
   Tomao A, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.009
   Tomao A, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V90, P594, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.051
   Tomao A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.006
   Tomao A, 2016, AGRIC AGRIC SCI PROC, V8, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.015
   Tyrvainen L, 2005, URBAN FORESTS TREES, V0, PP81, DOI 10.1007/3-540-27684-X_5
   Upreti R, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V26, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.008
   Vandermeulen V, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.010
   von Döhren P, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V67, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127440
   von Döhren P, 2019, ECOSYST SERV, V40, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101031
   Vos JWE, 1988, UNIFIED THEORY AND STRATEGIES OF SURVEY SAMPLING, V0, P0
NR 91
TC 18
Z9 20
U1 4
U2 32
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD AUG 15
PY 2023
VL 86
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128007
EA JUN 2023
PG 9
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban Studies
GA Q6EU2
UT WOS:001058442100001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Yang, C
   Qian, Z
AF Yang, Chen
   Qian, Zhu
TI Street network or functional attractors? Capturing pedestrian movement patterns and urban form with the integration of space syntax and MCDA
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban form; Pedestrian movement pattern; Space syntax; MCDA; Sensitivity analysis; Urban data
ID land-use; uncertainty analysis; openstreetmap; model; ahp; inconsistency; sensitivity; centrality; density; choice
AB The space syntax approach has been widely applied in urban studies and practices to investigate urban form and predict pedestrian movement patterns. Prior research has identified the 'circular causality' associated with the ontology of space syntax, indicating that network structure and functional attractors are mutually reinforced by movement patterns in urban spaces. Using the city of Xi'an as a case study, this research aims to deepen the understanding of urban form and human movement patterns from a new perspective that integrates the space syntax approach with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). To quantify the city's attractors and gauge their impacts on its urban form, this research uses available open urban datasets, including street networks from OpenStreetMap (OSM) and Point of Interest (POI) data. Facilitated by sensitivity analysis (SA), the findings suggest that the functional distinctiveness of districts plays a nuanced role in attracting and generating pedestrian flow. It is therefore essential to introduce a 'real-time' representation of urban spaces to supplement our conventional understanding.
C1 [Yang, Chen; Qian, Zhu] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
C3 University of Waterloo
RP Yang, C (通讯作者)，Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
EM c273yang@uwaterloo.ca
CR Al-Sayed K, 2018, SPACE SYNTAX METHODOLOGY, V0, P0
   Amenta P, 2021, EUR J OPER RES, V288, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.048
   Unknown -, 2015, SSS 2015, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2015, PROC 10 INT SPACE SY, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2016, SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT CONFERENCE-GENERAL FACT SHEET, V0, P0
   Arsanjani JJ, 2015, LECT NOTES GEOINF CA, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_1
   Azmi DI, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V68, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.237
   Batty M, 2013, NEW SCI CITIES, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.7551/mitpress/9399.001.0001
   Batty M, 2018, INVENTING FUTURE CITIES, V0, P1
   Batty M, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P403, DOI 10.1177/2399808319839494
   Brunelli M, 2015, J OPER RES SOC, V66, P1, DOI 10.1057/jors.2013.135
   Brunelli M, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V240, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.045
   Brunelli M, 2013, ANN OPER RES, V211, P493, DOI 10.1007/s10479-013-1329-0
   Burgess ErnestW, 1967, CITY, V0, PP47, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_5
   Chen, 2019, P 12 INT SPAC SYNT S, V0, P0
   Chen Y, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P1582, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.001
   Choe S, 2009, P INT C UBIQ INFORM, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1109/ICUT.2009.5405723
   Coffey L, 2021, EXPERT SYST APPL, V178, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114970
   Crooks AT, 2016, BUILT ENVIRONMENT, V42, P396, DOI 10.2148/benv.42.3.396
   Crosetto M, 2000, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V81, P71, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00169-9
   Dong QX, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V250, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.016
   Dong YC, 2010, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V49, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.003
   Emrouznejad A, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P6653, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1334976
   Fan HC, 2014, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V28, P700, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2013.867495
   Feick RD, 2000, JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH, V39, P163, DOI 10.1177/004728750003900206
   Feick RD, 2001, GEOJOURNAL, V53, P391, DOI 10.1023/A:1020137029547
   Feick RD, 2004, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V18, P815, DOI 10.1080/13658810412331280185
   Feizizadeh B, 2014, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V64, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.11.009
   Foda MA, 2010, JOURNAL OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, V13, P23, DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.13.4.2
   Foltête JC, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.12.001
   Froy F, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P2076, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1367141
   Garreau Joel, 1992, EDGE CITY: LIFE ON THE NEW FRONTIER, V1st, P0
   Gil J, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P819, DOI 10.1177/0265813516650678
   Gompf K, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13031258
   Grajewski Ted, 2001, SPACE SYNTAX OBSERVA, V0, P0
   Greene R, 2011, GEOGR COMPASS, V5, P412, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00431.x
   Gu K, 2014, URBAN MORPHOL, V18, P5
   Harris CD, 1945, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V242, P7, DOI 10.1177/000271624524200103
   HILLIER B, 1993, ENVIRON PLANN B, V20, P29, DOI 10.1068/b200029
   Hillier B, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3693, P475
   Hillier B, 1999, URBAN DES INT, V4, P107, DOI 10.1057/UDI.1999.19
   Hillier B, 2012, THE JOURNAL OF SPACE SYNTAX, V3, P155
   Hillier B, 1984, THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF SPACE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511597237
   Hillier B, 1997, INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTS, V0, PP295, DOI 10.1016/B978-044482332-8/50020-2
   Hillier B, 2016, THE JOURNAL OF SPACE SYNTAX, V6, P199
   Hillier B, 2014, ARCHIT DESIGN, V84, P100, DOI 10.1002/ad.1815
   Hölscher C, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN B, V39, P63, DOI 10.1068/b34050t
   Hoyt H, 1939, STRUCTURE GROWTH RES, V0, P0
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jiang B, 2002, TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, V6, P295, DOI 10.1111/1467-9671.00112
   Jiang B, 2009, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V23, P823, DOI 10.1080/13658810802022822
   Ker Ian, 2003, ROAD TRANSPORT RES, V12, P69
   Kim G, 2019, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V74, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.009
   Knöll M, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V45, P797, DOI 10.1177/0265813516686971
   Law S, 2014, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V4, P278, DOI 10.3390/bs4030278
   Lerman Y, 2014, GEOGR ANAL, V46, P392, DOI 10.1111/gean.12063
   Li, 2012, HUMAN CULTURE HERITA, V0, P17
   Li JG, 2019, CITIES, V86, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.008
   Li X, 2017, MULTIMED TOOLS APPL, V76, P17801, DOI 10.1007/s11042-015-3095-2
   Li Y, 2016, TOURISM MANAGE, V52, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.008
   Lin W, 2018, GEOFORUM, V89, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.005
   Liu PX, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10010221
   Liu XJ, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P341, DOI 10.1177/0265813515604767
   [龙瀛 Long Ying], 2018, 城市发展研究 URBAN STUDIES, V25, P86
   Malczewski J, 2015, MULTICRITERIA DECISI, V0, PP220, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74757-4
   Malczewski J, 2006, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V20, P703, DOI 10.1080/13658810600661508
   Mansouri M, 2017, JOURNAL OF URBANISM INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON PLACEMAKING AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, V10, P163, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2016.1213309
   Marcus K, 2010, J SPACE SYNTAX, V1, P30
   Mohamed AA, 2016, ALEX ENG J, V55, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2015.07.018
   Monokrousou K, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V223, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.312
   Mosadeghi R, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V49, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001
   Niu N, 2017, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V31, P1871, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2017.1325489
   Obeidat, 2015, INT SPAC SYNT S, V0, P207
   Oliveira V, 2016, URBAN BOOK SERIES, V0, PP1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32083-0
   Omer I, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.007
   Omer I, 2016, URBAN GEOGR, V37, P629, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2015.1101258
   Ozbil A, 2011, URBAN DES INT, V16, P125, DOI 10.1057/udi.2011.2
   Penn A, 2003, ENVIRON BEHAV, V35, P30, DOI 10.1177/0013916502238864
   Porta S, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN B, V36, P450, DOI 10.1068/b34098
   Qureshi ME, 1999, AGR SYST, V62, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00059-1
   Raford N, 2006, PEDESTRIAN VOLUME MODELING FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY AND EXPOSURE ANALYSIS: THE CASE OF BOSTON, V0, P0
   Rashid M, 2019, THE MATHEMATICS OF URBAN MORPHOLOGY, V0, PP199, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12381-910
   Ratti C, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P487, DOI 10.1068/b3019
   Saaty TL, 2000, FUNDAMENTALS OF DECISION MAKING AND PRIORITY THEORY WITH THE AHP, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-50244-64
   Saltelli A, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P1508, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.012
   Scheer BC, 2001, PLACES-FORUM ENVIRON, V14, P28
   Soja EdwardW, 2000, POSTMETROPOLIS CRITI, V0, P0
   Talav Era R, 2012, P 8 INT SPAC SYNT S, V0, P0
   Ting Lan, 2018, PROCEDIA COMPUTER SCIENCE, V131, P1260, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.343
   Turner A, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN B, V32, P425, DOI 10.1068/b31097
   Turner A, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN B, V34, P539, DOI 10.1068/b32067
   Vaughan L, 2010, J SPACE SYNTAX, V1, P77
   Wang FH, 2014, CITIES, V41, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.05.005
   Wang F, 2018, J GEOGR SCI, V28, P845, DOI 10.1007/s11442-018-1509-6
   WU Liangyong, 1986, A BRIEF HISTORY OF ANCIENT CHINESE CITY PLANNING, V0, P0
   Wu ZB, 2012, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V52, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.022
   Xu YJ, 2013, INFORM SCIENCES, V253, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.029
   Ye Y, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P631, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1381536
   Ye Y, 2017, URBAN DES INT, V22, P73, DOI 10.1057/s41289-016-0035-3
   Ye Y, 2014, URBAN MORPHOL, V18, P97
   Yigitcanlar T, 2007, AUST PLAN, V44, P30, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2007.9982586
   Zeng C, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V153, P637, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.090
   Zertuche LN, 2017, P 11 INT SPAC SYNT S, V0, P0
   Zhang YJ, 2015, J URBAN MANAG, V4, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2015.10.001
NR 105
TC 29
Z9 30
U1 8
U2 79
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD MAR 15
PY 2023
VL 28
IS 1
BP 3
EP 18
DI 10.1057/s41289-022-00178-w
EA JAN 2022
PG 16
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA C3IU2
UT WOS:000750639000001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Wang, F
   Chen, F
AF Wang, Fan
   Chen, Fei
TI Factors Affecting Neighborhood Walkability: A Pilot Empirical Study in Qingdao, China
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Neighborhood walkability; Pedestrian perception; Walking preference; Affecting factors; China
ID physical-activity; microscale audit; mode choice; walking; environment; behavior; city; level
AB As an important part of urban livable environment construction, urban streets are of great significance for daily social interaction and urban vitality. Enhancing walkability is considered an effective design measure to connect places and promote physical health. Compared with previous studies that focused on spatial physical characteristics or transportation infrastructure (such as zebra crossings) of streets, this study aims to identify and analyze walkability indicators that are closely related to subjective perception at the microscale. A questionnaire survey was conducted face to face to collect pedestrians' perception of walkability indicators, and an exploratory factor analysis was used to extract the main influencing factors. Structural equation models were constructed to verify the stability of the dominating factors and further explore the disparities in different walking intentions and different gender groups. According to the results, Access Safety, Stop Friendliness, and Visual Richness have a great impact on walkability, and women generally have a stronger perception of traffic disturbance and traffic safety than men. Ultimately, based on the results, some useful strategies are proposed for future street renewal. However, the study is limited to the geographical scope of Shinan District of Qingdao. Therefore, the longitudinal comparative analysis of other urban areas of Qingdao or intercity comparative analysis can be carried out in the future so as to provide extensive improvement recommendations.
C1 [Wang, Fan; Chen, Fei] Qingdao Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Urban Planning, 11 Fushun Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China.
C3 Qingdao University of Technology
RP Wang, F (通讯作者)，Qingdao Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Urban Planning, 11 Fushun Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China.
EM 839049074@qq.com; chenfei3913@126.com
CR Agrawal AW, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P81, DOI 10.4103/0971-9261.43034
   Althoff T, 2017, NATURE, V547, P336, DOI 10.1038/nature23018
   Asadi-Shekari Z, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V38, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.007
   Bellizzi MG, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su132212434
   Blecic I, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P895, DOI 10.1177/2399808320908294
   Cain KL, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V116, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042
   Clifton KJ, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   Conderino SE, 2021, AM J PREV MED, V61, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.014
   Day K, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
   Dong W, 2020, J APPL GERONTOL, V6, P30, DOI 10.11982/j.supr.20200605
   Fan PL, 2018, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V33, P323, DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0602-z
   Forsyth A, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800701816896
   Fuller M, 2017, AN ANALYSIS OF JANE JACOBSS THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Gebel K, 2009, ANN BEHAV MED, V37, P228, DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3
   Gehl J, 2010, HUMANIZED CITY, V0, P0
   Gerike R, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13169362
   Golan Y, 2019, J TRANSP LAND USE, V12, P501, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2019.1472
   Grasser G, 2017, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V27, P145, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckw118
   Hajna S, 2013, AM J PREV MED, V44, PE55, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.033
   Hanibuchi T, 2019, HEALTH PLACE, V59, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102203
   Hatamzadeh Y, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, P04021043, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000714
   Jensen WA, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14091014
   Jones AC, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.611895
   Kaparias I, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP17, DOI 10.3141/2586-03
   Karatas P, 2018, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V144, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000483
   Kato H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12219248
   Kim EJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11246915
   Koo BW, 2022, HEALTH PLACE, V73, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102733
   Labdaoui K, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V193, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107627
   Leather J, 2011, WALKABILITY AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN ASIAN CITIES STATE AND ISSUES, V0, P0
   Lee E, 2018, J TRANSP HEALTH, V9, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.03.004
   Leyden KM, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1546, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
   Lu YT, 2012, INT. URBAN PLANN, V27, P10
   Lu Y, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V208, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.022
   Ma H, 2019, ENVIRON SCI-NANO, V6, P16, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2019.06.003
   Mindell JS, 2017, STREET MOBILITY PROJECT: TOOLKIT, V0, P0
   Moura F, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Nyunt MSZ, 2015, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-015-0276-3
   Park S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP126, DOI 10.3141/2464-16
   Pelclová J, 2014, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V11, P527, DOI 10.3390/ijerph110100527
   Pikora TJ, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
   Qingdao Street Design Guidelines, 2019, QINGD MUN BUR NAT PL, V0, P0
   Roscoe C, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19074247
   Saelens BE, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1552, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
   Shashank A, 2019, HEALTH PLACE, V55, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Su SL, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V74, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
   Sun BD, 2017, J TRANSP GEOGR, V63, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.07.004
   Talavera-Garcia R, 2015, CITIES, V45, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003
   Talen Emily, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE LAND USE URBAN PLANNING, V1, P42, DOI 10.24102/ijslup.v1i1.211
   [田宝江 Tian Baojiang], 2017, 城市规划学刊 URBAN PLANNING FORUM, V0, P78
   Travers C, 2018, ENVIRON BEHAV, V50, P426, DOI 10.1177/0013916517707294
   Vichiensan V, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, P0, DOI 10.3390/su13126825
   Wu JS, 2014, ALZHEIMERS DEMENT, V21, P49, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2014.10.008
   Xia ZL, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, P0, DOI 10.3390/su10113879
   Xiong YB, 2020, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V146, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000547
   Yencha C, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V130, P689, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.053
   Zhang JY, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P0, DOI 10.3390/su11082205
   [周热娜 ZHOU Rena], 2011, 中国公共卫生 CHINA PUBLIC HEALTH, V27, P841
   Zhu WF, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V167, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.014
NR 60
TC 3
Z9 4
U1 2
U2 51
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD MAR 1
PY 2023
VL 149
IS 1
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4138
PG 13
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 9C7JM
UT WOS:000935589400002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Tao, S
   He, SY
   Chen, XY
   Lee, JW
   Liu, M
AF Tao, Sui
   He, Sylvia Y.
   Chen, Xueying
   Lee, Jeongwoo
   Liu, Meng
TI Walking accessibility to non-work facilities and travel patterns in suburban new towns
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Accessibility; New town; Non -work facilities; Self -containment; Active travel; Walkable city
ID spatial accessibility; built environment; public transport; urban form; community; singapore; lessons
AB Previous research on the self-containment of new towns has focused on access to employment and commute travel; little research has been documented regarding access to non-work facilities and its relation to non-work active travel, overlooking an important aspect to assessing the self-containment of new towns. Drawing on multiple sources of data in Hong Kong, we measure walking accessibility to three main types of non-work fa-cilities (markets, restaurants and parks) as major destinations for non-work travel. Through a series of statistical analysis, we investigate in detail the effects of accessibility on the probability and duration of home-based walking trips. Our findings indicate that: (1) new towns were more disadvantaged and less equitable in terms of the accessibility to non-work facilities than urban areas; and (2) accessibility increased both the likelihood and duration of new town residents' walking trips particularly for grocery-shopping and dining-out purposes. The findings indicate that enhancing accessibility to non-work facilities in new towns can be beneficial in terms of both achieving self-containment and promoting more sustainable travel behaviour. Recommendations are pro-posed accordingly to help create more pedestrian-friendly environment, and balanced provision of non-work facilities in and around new towns and other suburban developments.
C1 [Tao, Sui] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [He, Sylvia Y.; Liu, Meng] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog & Resource Management, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Xueying] Nanning Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Planning, Nanning, Peoples R China.
   [Lee, Jeongwoo] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Urban Design & Studies, Seoul, South Korea.
C3 Beijing Normal University; Chinese University of Hong Kong; Nanning Normal University; Chung Ang University
RP He, SY (通讯作者)，Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog & Resource Management, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM sylviahe@cuhk.edu.hk
FU Chinese University of Hong Kong; National Natural Science Foundation of China [42201217]
CR Agrawal AW, 2007, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V12, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.005
   ALONSO W, 1970, URBAN STUD, V7, P37, DOI 10.1080/00420987020080031
   Ariza-Alvarez A, 2021, RES TRANSP ECON, V87, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2019.100745
   Bennett J, 2005, NEW TOWNS GROWTH ARE, V0, P0
   CERVERO R, 1995, URBAN STUD, V32, P1135, DOI 10.1080/00420989550012618
   Cheng L, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V76, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.019
   Civil Engineering and Development Department of HKSAR, 2016, NEW TOWNS, V0, P0
   Clapson M, 2002, PLAN PERSPECT, V17, P145
   Clapson M, 2018, HISTOIRE URBAINE, Vn° 50, P93, DOI 10.3917/rhu.050.0093
   Delbosc A, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1252, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.008
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Forsyth A, 2002, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V68, P387, DOI 10.1080/01944360208976282
   Forsyth A, 2021, CITY 21ST CENTURY, V0, P32
   Forsyth A, 2019, TOWN PLAN REV, V90, P239, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2019.17
   GASTWIRTJL, 1972, REV ECON STAT, V54, P306, DOI 10.2307/1937992
   HANSEN WG, 1959, J AM I PLANNERS, V25, P73, DOI 10.1080/01944365908978307
   He SY, 2020, HABITAT INT, V98, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102153
   He SY, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P324, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1725602
   Hills P, 1983, BUILT ENVIRONMENT (1978-), V0, P266
   Hong Kong City Guide, 2010, 2011 HONG KONG CIT G, V0, P0
   Horner MW, 2021, URBAN FORM AND ACCESSIBILITY, V0, P13
   Hou YT, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V73, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.003
   Hui ECM, 2005, HABITAT INT, V29, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.01.001
   Jun MJ, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P2171, DOI 10.1068/a44635
   Kang CD, 2015, CITIES, V46, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.006
   Lang W, 2019, CITIES, V84, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.003
   Lau JCY, 2011, CITIES, V28, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2010.12.005
   Lee J, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V7, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2017.08.008
   Lee J, 2016, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V142, P0, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000312
   Liu JX, 2021, J TRANSP LAND USE, V14, P1129, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2021.1933
   Liu M, 2022, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V28, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.003
   Lu Y, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V14, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.100616
   Luo W, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN B, V30, P865, DOI 10.1068/b29120
   Marquet O, 2015, CITIES, V42, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.012
   Ng MK, 2018, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V19, P319, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2018.1486593
   OGILVY AA, 1968, TOWN PLAN REV, V39, P38, DOI 10.3828/tpr.39.1.p400g1212621mk35
   Osborn FredericJ, 1977, NEW TOWNS THEIR ORIG, V3rd, P0
   Páez A, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V25, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
   Reyes M, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.002
   Rowe PG, 2021, CITY 21ST CENTURY, V0, P119
   Scharoun L, 2014, AM MALL CULTURAL ROL, V0, P0
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Stopher PR, 2017, TRANSPORTATION, V44, P1069, DOI 10.1007/s11116-016-9694-6
   Tang BS, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1340, DOI 10.1177/2399808320932575
   Tao S, 2022, J TRANSP LAND USE, V15, P375, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2022.2075
   Tao S, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P1379, DOI 10.1007/s11116-020-10100-4
   Neves CET, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V93, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103064
   Wang L, 2010, RES URBAN SOCIOL, V10, P319, DOI 10.1108/S1047-0042(2010)0000010016
   Wang ZY, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V194, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110591
   Wannop, 1999, BRITISH PLANNING: 50 YEARS OF URBAN AND REGIONAL POLICY, V0, P213
   Ward S, 2005, THE GARDEN CITY: PAST, V0, Present and future
   Weng M, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005
   Widener MJ, 2017, PROF GEOGR, V69, P362, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2016.1237293
   Wu HY, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0256904
   Xia JH, 2016, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V94, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.009
   Yeh AGO, 2021, CITY 21ST CENTURY, V0, P182
   Zhu XM, 2023, J PLAN EDUC RES, V43, P538, DOI 10.1177/0739456X19900528
NR 57
TC 27
Z9 28
U1 4
U2 67
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUN 15
PY 2023
VL 137
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104324
EA APR 2023
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA G3LT2
UT WOS:000988218500001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Boakye, K
   Bovbjerg, M
   Schuna , S Jr
   Branscum, A
   Mat-Nasir, N
   Bahonar, A
   Barbarash, O
   Yusuf, R
   Lopez-Jaramillo, P
   Seron, P
   Rosengren, A
   Yeates, K
   Chifamba, J
   Alhabib, KF
   Davletov, K
   Keskinler, MV
   Diaz, M
   Kruger, L
   Li, Y
   Zhiguang, L
   Tse, LA
   Wielgosz, A
   Teo, K
   Erkin, M
   Rangarajan, S
   Lear, S
   Yusuf, S
   Hystad, P
AF Boakye, Kwadwo
   Bovbjerg, Marit
   Schuna Jr, John
   Branscum, Adam
   Mat-Nasir, Nafiza
   Bahonar, Ahmad
   Barbarash, Olga
   Yusuf, Rita
   Lopez-Jaramillo, Patricio
   Seron, Pamela
   Rosengren, Annika
   Yeates, Karen
   Chifamba, Jephat
   Alhabib, Khalid F.
   Davletov, Kairat
   Keskinler, Mirac Vural
   Diaz, Maria
   Kruger, Lanthe
   Li, Yang
   Zhiguang, Liu
   Tse, Lap Ah.
   Wielgosz, Andreas
   Teo, Koon
   Erkin, Mirrakhimov
   Rangarajan, Sumathy
   Lear, Scott
   Yusuf, Salim
   Hystad, Perry
TI Perceived built environment characteristics associated with walking and cycling across 355 communities in 21 countries
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Active transport; Leisure; Physical activity; Built environment; Global
ID physical-activity; neighborhood environment; public-health; older-adults; prevalence; transport; leisure; bicycle; scale
AB Research examining built environment (BE) characteristics and walking/cycling behaviors has been conducted primarily in high-income countries and conclusions cannot be applied directly to low-and middle-income countries. We evaluated perceived BE characteristics and walking/cycling behaviors across 355 urban commu-nities in 21 low-, middle-, and high-income countries using individual data for 39,908 adults in the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology study. The 1-week long-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to measure walking/cycling behaviors. Perceived BE characteristics were measured using the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale. Mixed effects logistic regression models examined associations between BE measures and walking for transport (>= 150 min/wk), walking for leisure (>= 150 min/wk), and any cycling for transport, controlling for individual, household, and community factors. Land-use mix diversity, land-use mix access, and street connectivity were associated with higher odds of walking for transport. Land-use mix diversity, land-use mix access, safety from traffic and safety from crime were associated with higher odds of walking for leisure. Land-use mix diversity, land-use mix access, and aesthetics were associated with higher odds of cycling. Differences in associations were observed by country-income status. Our findings can help guide policy makers globally to implement BE design to encourage walking and cycling behaviors.
C1 [Boakye, Kwadwo] Calif State Univ Chico, Dept Publ Hlth & Hlth Serv Adm, Chico, CA USA.
   [Bovbjerg, Marit; Schuna Jr, John; Branscum, Adam; Hystad, Perry] Oregon State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Human Sci, Corvallis, OR USA.
   [Mat-Nasir, Nafiza] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Med, Primary Care Med Discipline, Sungai Buloh 47000, Selangor, Malaysia.
   [Bahonar, Ahmad] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Cardiovasc Res Inst, Isfahan Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran.
   [Barbarash, Olga] Fed State Budgetary Inst Res Inst Complex Issues, Moscow, Russia.
   [Yusuf, Rita] Independent Univ, Sch Life Sci, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
   [Lopez-Jaramillo, Patricio] Univ Santander UDES, Masira Res Inst, Med Sch, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
   [Seron, Pamela] Univ La Frontera, Fac Med, Claro Solar 115, Temuco, Chile.
   [Rosengren, Annika] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   [Rosengren, Annika] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, VGR Reg, S-95929 Sahlgrenska, Sweden.
   [Yeates, Karen] Queens Univ, Dept Med, Toronoto, ON, Canada.
   [Chifamba, Jephat] Univ Zimbabwe, Dept Biomed Sci, Harare, Zimbabwe.
   [Alhabib, Khalid F.] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, King Fahad Cardiac Ctr, Dept Cardiac Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
   [Davletov, Kairat] Al Farabi Kazakh Natl Univ, Hlth Res Inst, 71 Al Farabi Avenu, Alma Ata, Kazakhstan.
   [Keskinler, Mirac Vural] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Dept Internal Med, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkiye.
   [Diaz, Maria] Inst Cardiovasc Rosario, Orono 450, Rosario, Argentina.
   [Kruger, Lanthe] North West Univ, Africa Unit Transdisciplinary Hlth Res, Potchefstroom, North West Prov, South Africa.
   [Li, Yang] Peking Union Med College& Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, Med Res & Biometr Ctr,Nat Clin Res Ctr Cardiovasc, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhiguang, Liu] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Drug Clin Trial Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Tse, Lap Ah.] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, JC Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Wielgosz, Andreas] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
   [Teo, Koon; Rangarajan, Sumathy; Yusuf, Salim] McMaster Univ, Populat Hlth Res Inst, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
   [Teo, Koon; Rangarajan, Sumathy; Yusuf, Salim] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, Canada.
   [Erkin, Mirrakhimov] Kyrgyz State Med Acad, 92 Akhunbaev St, Bishkek 720020, Kyrgyzstan.
   [Lear, Scott] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
C3 California State University System; California State University Chico; Oregon State University; Universiti Teknologi MARA; Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; Independent University Bangladesh (IUB); University of Santander; Universidad de La Frontera; University of Gothenburg; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Queens University - Canada; University of Zimbabwe; King Saud University; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; Istanbul Medeniyet University; North West University - South Africa; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College; Fu Wai Hospital - CAMS; Capital Medical University; Chinese University of Hong Kong; University of Ottawa; Population Health Research Institute; McMaster University; McMaster University; Ministry of Health - Kyrgyzstan; Kyrgyz State Medical Academy; Simon Fraser University
RP Boakye, K (通讯作者)，Calif State Univ Chico, Dept Publ Hlth & Hlth Serv Adm, Chico, CA USA.
EM kaboakye@csuchico.edu
FU Population Health Research Institute; Hamilton Health Sciences Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Heart and Stroke Foundation (ON, Canada); Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Canadian Institutes for Health Research [136893]; Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health [DP5OD019850]; AstraZeneca (Canada); Sanofi-Aventis (France and Canada); Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany); Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
CR Abasahl F, 2018, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V11, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.01.002
   American Heart Association, 2018, AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN ADULTS AND KIDS, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2021, WORLD BANK CARBON TAX DATA ASSISTANCE FROM CELINE RAMSTEIN AND OZGUR BOZCAGA, V0, P0
   Bassett DR, 2008, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V5, P795, DOI 10.1123/jpah.5.6.795
   Bauman A, 2011, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V65, P35, DOI 10.1136/jech.2008.086710
   Cerin E, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P1682, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d
   Cerin E, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-309
   Cleland C, 2018, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V18, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0642-3
   Cole Rachel, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, P164, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.2.164
   Corsi DJ, 2013, AM HEART J, V166, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.019
   Craig CL, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P1381, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
   De Bourdeaudhuij I, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P83, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.83
   Elshahat S, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0230454
   Ferrari G, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186858
   Fraser SDS, 2011, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, P738, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckq145
   Guthold R, 2018, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V6, PE1077, DOI 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30357-7
   Hallal PC, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P1894, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000093615.33774.0E
   Inoue S, 2010, J EPIDEMIOL, V20, P277, DOI 10.2188/jea.JE20090120
   Jia YN, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0090078
   Kerr J, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P290, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409466
   Leslie E, 2005, HEALTH PLACE, V11, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.005
   Marques A, 2015, PREV MED, V81, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.018
   Mertens L, 2019, HEALTH PLACE, V55, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.001
   Nang EEK, 2011, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V11, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-141
   Owen N, 2010, J URBAN HEALTH, V87, P189, DOI 10.1007/s11524-009-9424-x
   Parra DC, 2011, PREV MED, V52, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.12.008
   Pedersen MRL, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19159000
   Pucher J, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1509, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1509
   Ravensbergen L, 2019, GEOGR COMPASS, V13, P0, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12461
   Saelens BE, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1552, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
   Sakurai R, 2016, J EPIDEMIOL, V26, P307, DOI 10.2188/jea.JE20150017
   Sallis JF, 2016, LANCET, V387, P2207, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2
   Spinney JEL, 2012, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V9, P153, DOI 10.1123/jpah.9.2.153
   Teo K, 2009, AM HEART J, V158, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.019
   *TRANSP RES BOARD, 2005, 282 TRANSP RES BOARD, V0, P0
   United Nations EP, 2019, CYCL BETT MOD TRANSP, V0, P0
   Van Dyck D, 2012, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V9, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-70
   Van Holle V, 2012, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-807
   World Health Organization, 2021, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SURVEILLANCE, V0, P0
   Yusuf S, 2004, LANCET, V364, P937, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9
   Yusuf S, 2020, LANCET, V395, P795, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32008-2
   Zang P, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.775103
NR 42
TC 39
Z9 42
U1 8
U2 74
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JAN 15
PY 2023
VL 132
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104102
EA NOV 2022
PG 10
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA 8B3QV
UT WOS:000916841800010
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Liu, JK
   Ettema, D
   Helbich, M
AF Liu, Jiakun
   Ettema, Dick
   Helbich, Marco
TI Street view environments are associated with the walking duration of pedestrians: The case of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Walking; Active travel; Built and natural environment; Street view; Deep learning; Non-linearities
ID urban design quality; built environment; recreational walking; physical-activity; travel; adults; utilitarian; walkability; transport; location
AB Different aspects of the built and natural environment appear related to people's walking behavior. State-of-the-art transport studies typically incorporate built environmental measures (e.g., density, diversity, design). However, street view (SV) environments capturing how pedestrians perceived their surroundings on site are understudied. Therefore, this study examined possibly non-linear associations between multiple SV-derived environmental features and pedestrians' walking duration in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We used travel sur-vey data (N = 1,886) between 2014 and 2017. SV-derived environmental measures (e.g., cars and people) were extracted from SV images through a fully convolutional neural network. Covariate-adjusted generalized additive mixed models were fitted to the data. Our results showed that walking-SV features associations differed between weekdays and weekends. On weekdays, pedestrians walked more in neighborhoods with fewer individual standing walls and lower address density. On weekends, pedestrians' walking duration increased with more street greenery, fewer cars, higher address density, pronounced land-use diversity, and further distances to train stations. Non-linear associations were found only in the case of weekday SV-derived people, even after adjusting for other neighborhood characteristics (e.g., address density, land-use mix, and street connectivity). Our findings suggest that SV environmental features complement the typically used built environmental measures to explain pedestrians' mobility. Policy-makers and urban planners are advised to incorporate characteristics of the street environments, also should not only rely on the conventional thinking "the more, the merrier".
C1 [Liu, Jiakun; Ettema, Dick; Helbich, Marco] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
C3 Utrecht University
RP Liu, JK (通讯作者)，Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
EM j.liu5@uu.nl
FU Research IT Innovation Fund at Utrecht University; Chinese Scholarship Council [201904910425]
CR Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Alin A, 2010, WIRES COMPUT STAT, V2, P370, DOI 10.1002/wics.84
   Badland HM, 2010, J URBAN HEALTH, V87, P1007, DOI 10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x
   Barnett DW, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z
   Bhat CR, 2004, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V38, P767, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2003.10.003
   Birenboim A, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101650
   Bunds KS, 2019, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V65, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.006
   CBS (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek), 2015, CBS CENTR BUR STAT O, V0, P0
   CBS (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek), 2017, WIJKEN BUURTKAART 2017, V0, P0
   Cerin E, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V211, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.034
   Cerin E, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0493-z
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Cheng L, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102552
   Chollet F, 2017, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP1800, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120204
   Christman ZJ, 2020, GERONTOLOGIST, V60, P651, DOI 10.1093/geront/gnz093
   Cordts M, 2016, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP3213, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2016.350
   Ding C, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V77, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.04.011
   Doescher MP, 2017, J IMMIGR MINOR HEALT, V19, P237, DOI 10.1007/s10903-016-0383-5
   Elliott G, 2013, J ECONOMETRICS, V177, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.04.017
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Ewing Reid, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS223, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
   Ewing R, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P5, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15591585
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Frank LD, 1994, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1466, P37, DOI 10.1073/PNAS.1100480108
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   Gao J, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V88, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102860
   Gemeente Amsterdam, 2022, REG PAN, V0, P0
   Gim THT, 2018, EUR TRANSP RES REV, V10, P0, DOI 10.1007/s12544-018-0285-9
   Goel R, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0196521
   Grasser G, 2013, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH, V58, P615, DOI 10.1007/s00038-012-0435-0
   Gullón P, 2015, J URBAN HEALTH, V92, P923, DOI 10.1007/s11524-015-9982-z
   Hajrasouliha A, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P2483, DOI 10.1177/0042098014544763
   Handy S, 2005, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V28, P146, DOI 10.1177/0160017604273626
   Hankey S, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V90, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102651
   Hanson S, 2015, BRIT J SPORT MED, V49, P710, DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094157
   Hasan MM, 2021, C TRANSP RES BOARD 1, V0, P0
   Helbich M, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104181
   Helbich M, 2017, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V11, P507, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2016.1275892
   Hipp JR, 2022, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V38, P537, DOI 10.1007/s10940-021-09506-9
   Ho C, 2013, TRANSPORTATION, V40, P789, DOI 10.1007/s11116-013-9479-0
   HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
   HOWARD GS, 1980, EVALUATION REV, V4, P93, DOI 10.1177/0193841X8000400105
   Ibrahim MR, 2020, CITIES, V96, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102481
   Jamal S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P0, DOI 10.3390/su12198236
   Jiang YX, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V101, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103096
   Kamann C, 2020, PROC CVPR IEEE, V0, PP8825, DOI 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00885
   Kamruzzaman M, 2016, TRANSPORTATION, V43, P53, DOI 10.1007/s11116-014-9563-0
   Kang B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V57, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2017.09.026
   Kang YH, 2020, ANN GIS, V26, P261, DOI 10.1080/19475683.2020.1791954
   Kerr J, 2016, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V124, P290, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1409466
   Keskinen KE, 2020, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, P0, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.578275
   Ki D, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103920
   Koo BW, 2022, ENVIRON BEHAV, V54, P211, DOI 10.1177/00139165211014609
   Leyland A H, 2020, MULTILEVEL MODELLING FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH: HEALTH IN CONTEXT, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-34801-4
   Li XJ, 2018, T GIS, V22, P1029, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12472
   Liao BJ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V85, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102390
   Liu JX, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V92, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103034
   Lu Y, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V14, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.100616
   Lu Y, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.029
   Lu Y, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15081576
   Lu Y, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V208, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.022
   Lumley Thomas, 2024, CRAN, V0, P0
   Maas J, 2008, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-8-206
   MacCallum RC, 1999, PSYCHOL METHODS, V4, P84, DOI 10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84
   Mäki-Opas TE, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3264-x
   Makowski D, 2020, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V5, P2306, DOI 10.21105/joss.02306
   Marques A, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17031041
   Mehdizadeh M, 2017, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V102, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.020
   Mirzaei E, 2018, EUR TRANSP RES REV, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12544-018-0292-x
   Mokhtarian PL, 2001, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V35, P695, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00013-6
   Nagata S, 2020, HEALTH PLACE, V66, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428
   Park K, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P236, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2019.1692690
   Perchoux C, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.04.002
   Peters M, 2020, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-020-00243-z
   Raats MM, 1992, FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
   Raux C, 2016, EUR TRANSP RES REV, V8, P0, DOI 10.1007/s12544-016-0213-9
   Rundle AG, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V40, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.034
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   Sallis JF, 2015, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V12, P0, DOI 10.5888/pcd12.150098
   Sarker RI, 2019, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V9, P38, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-07-2017-0031
   Shigematsu R, 2009, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V41, P314, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318185496c
   Steinmetz-Wood M, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7460-3
   STOKOLS D, 1992, AM PSYCHOL, V47, P6, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.6
   Tsai WL, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103619
   van Kampen J, 2021, J AMB INTEL HUM COMP, V12, P137, DOI 10.1007/s12652-020-02856-5
   van Wee B, 2016, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V10, P18, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2013.820998
   van Wee B, 2009, TRANSPORT REV, V29, P279, DOI 10.1080/01441640902752961
   Vanwolleghem G, 2016, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V15, P0, DOI 10.1186/s12942-016-0069-1
   Wang XG, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V99, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103303
   Wang Y, 2016, CITIES, V50, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.004
   Wang ZY, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V194, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110591
   Wasfi RA, 2016, J TRANSP HEALTH, V3, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2015.08.001
   Wood SimonN, 2006, GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODELS: AN INTRODUCTION WITH R, V1st, P0, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00905_3.x
   Yang HR, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V155, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.017
   Yang LC, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V94, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103099
   Yang YY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101747
   Yin L, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.001
   Yin L, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V76, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.024
   Yin L, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V63, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.010
   Zang P, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, P0, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17176130
   Zhou H, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V227, P0, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104543
NR 102
TC 46
Z9 50
U1 18
U2 202
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD JUL 15
PY 2023
VL 235
IS 
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104752
EA MAR 2023
PG 10
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA C1LQ7
UT WOS:000959621800001
DA 2026-05-02
ER

