PT J
AU Sarkar, C
   Webster, C
   Pryor, M
   Tang, D
   Melbourne, S
   Zhang, XH
   Liu, JZ
AF Sarkar, Chinmoy
   Webster, Chris
   Pryor, Matthew
   Tang, Dorothy
   Melbourne, Scott
   Zhang, Xiaohu
   Liu Jianzheng
TI Exploring associations between urban green, street design and walking: Results from the Greater London boroughs
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban green; NDVI; Street trees; Urban morphology; sDNA; Walking; LTDS
ID body-mass index; built environment configuration; physical-activity; neighborhood greenness; health inequality; possible mechanism; public-health; mental-health; land-use; space
AB In recent years, a series of studies have highlighted the positive effects of urban green on individual activity behaviour and health. In this paper, we examine salutogenic environment effects of urban green upon walking behaviour and how such effects are mediated by built environment configuration and street-level physical accessibility. The dwelling locations of N = 15,354 respondents of the London Travel Demand Survey were geocoded and individual walking behaviour was extracted from the travel diary. A 0.5-m resolution normalized difference vegetation (NDVI) index derived from spectral reflectance measurements in remotely sensed colour infrared data was employed as an objective measure of greenness, while density of street trees acted as proxy of perceived environmental quality in street corridors. A network model of street-level physical accessibility was developed using spatial Design Network Analysis (sDNA). Logistic regression models reported a significant association of odds of walking with density of street trees and street-level betweenness (a measure of street network connectivity), while sensitivity analyses with continuous regression models for participants doing some walking indicated beneficial associations of distance walked with NDVI greenness and street trees. The results illustrate the necessity for targeted intervention strategies in activity-friendly planning via greening and optimized physical design of urban built environments. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Sarkar, Chinmoy; Webster, Chris; Pryor, Matthew; Tang, Dorothy; Melbourne, Scott; Zhang, Xiaohu; Liu Jianzheng] Univ Hong Kong, HKUrban Lab, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Hong Kong
RP Sarkar, C (通讯作者)，Univ Hong Kong, HKUrban Lab, Knowles Bldg,Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM csarkar@hku.hk
FU UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [ES/L003201/1]; Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L003201/1] Funding Source: researchfish; ESRC [ES/L003201/1] Funding Source: UKRI
CR Almanza E, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.003
   ANDERSON LM, 1988, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V15, P153, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90023-0
   Unknown -, 2015, LANDSC ARCHIT FRONT, V3, P8, DOI 10.1007/slaf-0008-0301-xx
   Unknown -, 2010, URB GREEN NAT BUILD, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2012, WALK CYCL LOC MEAS P, V0, P0
   Appleyard D, 1981, LIVABLE STREETS, V0, P0
   Astell-Burt T, 2014, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V68, P578, DOI 10.1136/jech-2013-203767
   Bates Andy, 2006, POPUL TRENDS, V0, P30
   Bedimo-Rung AL, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
   Bell JF, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V35, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.07.006
   Boer R, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V32, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.012
   Cerin E, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P713, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.002
   Chiaradia A, 2012, SDNA A SOFTWARE FOR SPATIAL DESIGN NETWORK ANALYSIS, V0, P0
   Cooper CHV, 2014, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-13-11
   Cummins S, 2007, SOC SCI MED, V65, P1825, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.036
   Davis A, 2002, PHYS ACTIVE LIFE EVE, V0, P0
   de Vries S, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN A, V35, P1717, DOI 10.1068/a35111
   Eyler AA, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P1529, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000084622.39122.0C
   Flint E, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V349, P0, DOI 10.1136/bmj.g4887
   Forsyth A, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P1973, DOI 10.1177/0042098008093386
   Foster J, 2009, EMOTION, V0, P97
   Giles-Corti B, 2002, SOC SCI MED, V54, P1793, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2
   Gómez LF, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V38, P592, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.005
   Grahn Patrik, 2003, URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, V2, P001, DOI 10.1078/1618-8667-00019
   Grey G, 1986, URBAN FORESTRY, V2nd, P0
   Grigsby-Toussaint DS, 2011, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-10-66
   Hale J, 2011, SOC SCI MED, V72, P1853, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.044
   Hartig T, 2003, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V23, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
   Hartig T, 2014, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V35, P207, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
   Hillier B, 2005, SPATIAL INFORM THEOR, V3693, P553, DOI 10.1007/11556114_30
   Jarrett J, 2012, LANCET, V379, P2198, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60766-1
   King WC, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P74, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.74
   Koohsari MJ, 2013, ENVIRON BEHAV, V45, P706, DOI 10.1177/0013916512440876
   Kweon BS, 1998, ENVIRON BEHAV, V30, P832, DOI 10.1177/001391659803000605
   Lansstyrelsen, 1996, ENV AN 1996 STOCKH C, V0, P0
   Lawrence HenryW, 2008, CITY TREES HIST GEOG, V0, P0
   Lee ACK, 2011, J PUBLIC HEALTH-UK, V33, P212, DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
   Lee C, 2006, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V11, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003
   Lee IM, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS512, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0
   Leslie E, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V95, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.002
   Li FZ, 2005, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V59, P558, DOI 10.1136/jech.2004.028399
   Liu GC, 2007, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P317, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.317
   Loughner CP, 2012, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V51, P1775, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0228.1
   Lovasi GS, 2008, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V62, P647, DOI 10.1136/jech.2007.071894
   Lovasi GS, 2013, PREV MED, V57, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.012
   Lovasi GS, 2011, J URBAN HEALTH, V88, P1143, DOI 10.1007/s11524-011-9604-3
   Maas J, 2008, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-8-206
   Maas J, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006
   Manley AF, 1996, PHYS ACT HLTH REP SU, V0, P0
   Mayor of London, 2008, OP SPAC STRAT BEST P, V0, P0
   Mindell JS, 2012, J URBAN HEALTH, V89, P232, DOI 10.1007/s11524-011-9637-7
   Mitchell R, 2008, LANCET, V372, P1655, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X
   MOLL G, 1989, SHADING OUR CITIES, V0, P0
   Nagel CL, 2008, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V168, P461, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwn158
   Nowak David J, 2006, URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, V5, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007
   Owen N, 2004, AM J PREV MED, V27, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006
   PATE RR, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V273, P402, DOI 10.1001/jama.273.5.402
   Pauleit S, 2005, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V71, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.009
   Pearce JR, 2010, T I BRIT GEOGR, V35, P522, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00399.x
   Pereira G, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-12-49
   Pereira G, 2012, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-466
   Pikora TJ, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P708, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000210189.64458.f3
   Porta S, 2014, URBAN STUD, V0, P0
   Rhew IC, 2011, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V21, P946, DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.09.001
   Saelens BE, 2003, ANN BEHAV MED, V25, P80, DOI 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   Sallis JF, 2004, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V38, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2003.11.003
   Sarkar C, 2014, HEALTHY CITIES: PUBLIC HEALTH THROUGH URBAN PLANNING, V0, P0
   Sarkar C, 2014, MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT IN UK BIOBANK: DATA ANALYSES AND SPECIFICATION MANUAL, V0, P0
   Sarkar C, 2015, ANN GIS, V21, P135, DOI 10.1080/19475683.2015.1027791
   Sarkar C, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-695
   Sarkar C, 2013, HEALTH PLACE, V19, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.10.001
   Shashua-Bar L, 2000, ENERG BUILDINGS, V31, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
   Shortt NK, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN A, V46, P1479, DOI 10.1068/a46113
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Sugiyama T, 2008, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V62, P0, DOI 10.1136/jech.2007.064287
   Sullivan WC, 2004, ENVIRON BEHAV, V36, P678, DOI 10.1177/0193841x04264945
   Suminski RR, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.009
   Takano T, 2002, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V56, P913, DOI 10.1136/jech.56.12.913
   The Marmot Review, 2010, FAIR SOCIETY, V0, P0
   Thompson CW, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
   Tilt JH, 2007, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P371, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.371
   Troped PJ, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V38, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.032
   Tsourou C, 1998, URBAN PLANNING HLTH, V0, P0
   Tyrväinen L, 2000, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V39, P205, DOI 10.1006/jeem.1999.1097
   Warburton DER, 2006, CAN MED ASSOC J, V174, P801, DOI 10.1503/cmaj.051351
   Wendel-Vos GCW, 2004, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V36, P725, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000121955.03461.0A
   Woo J, 2009, LANCET, V373, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60094-5
NR 91
TC 224
Z9 249
U1 25
U2 462
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD NOV 15
PY 2015
VL 143
IS 
BP 112
EP 125
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.013
PG 14
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CT2EN
UT WOS:000362614900012
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU North, EA
   Johnson, GR
   Burk, TE
AF North, Eric A.
   Johnson, Gary R.
   Burk, Thomas E.
TI Trunk flare diameter predictions as an infrastructure planning tool to reduce tree and sidewalk conflicts
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Green infrastructure; Sidewalk damage; Street tree; Trunk flare diameter; Urban infrastructure
AB Research has shown urban trees have numerous benefits for society, many of which are not realized until trees have grown to a mature size. However, many trees are removed every year due to their negative impacts on urban infrastructure before their benefits are fully realized. Trunk flares and roots damage sidewalks and other urban infrastructure. This study's intent was to create predictive models for two tree genera commonly planted as street trees in Minnesota landscapes. Linear regression techniques were used to create predictive equations using diameter at breast height (DBH) as the primary predictive variable. Predictive models of trunk flare diameter at ground line (TFD) have potential to provide urban foresters and urban planners with a practical method for predicting TFD in order to aid infrastructure plans that reduce conflicts between urban trees and urban infrastructure. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
C1 [North, Eric A.; Johnson, Gary R.; Burk, Thomas E.] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
C3 University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities
RP North, EA (通讯作者)，Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
FU University of Minnesota's Natural Resources Science and Management graduate program
CR Akbari H, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
   Unknown -, 2014, MSOR CONNECT, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1998, TREE ROOTS INFRASTRU, V0, P0
   Brack CL, 2002, ENVIRON POLLUT, V116, PS195, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00251-2
   Cappiella K, 2005, URBAN WATERSHED FORESTRY MANUAL PART 1: METHODS FOR INCREASING FOREST COVER IN A WATERSHED, V0, P0
   Costello LR, 2003, REDUCING INFRASTRUCT, V0, P0
   Donovan GH, 2012, ENVIRON BEHAV, V44, P3, DOI 10.1177/0013916510383238
   Ek AR, 1974, DIMENSIONAL RELATIONSHIP OF FOREST AND OPEN GROWN TREES IN WISCONSIN, V0, P0
   Frelich LE, 1992, PREDICTING DIMENSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS FOR TWIN CITIES SHADE TREES, V0, P0
   GILMAN E F, 1990, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HORTICULTURE, V8, P215
   Gouin FR, 1983, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HORTICULTURE, V1, P48
   HAMILTON W D, 1988, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V14, P288
   Hauer Richard J, 1994, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V20, P94
   Jackson LE, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V64, P191, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00230-X
   JAENSON R, 1992, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V18, P171
   Johnson GR, 2000, A PRACTITIONERS GUIDE TO STEM GIRDLING ROOTS OF TREES: IMPACTS ON TREES, V0, P0
   Kim S, 2011, KSCE J CIV ENG, V15, P883, DOI 10.1007/s12205-011-1173-1
   Lee BJ, 2009, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V135, P133, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000013
   Madlener R, 2011, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V1, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.006
   Nowak David J, 2006, URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, V4, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007
   Peper Paula J, 2001, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V27, P306
   Randrup TB, 2001, URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, V5, P209, DOI 10.1023/A:1024046004731
   Sander H, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1646, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.011
   Sanders Jessica, 2013, ARBORICULTURE & URBAN FORESTRY, V39, P68
   Scott JL, 2000, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V26, P69
   Sydnor TDavis, 2000, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V26, P20
   Wagar JA, 1983, JOURNAL OF ARBORICULTURE, V9, P177
   Watson Gary W, 1997, ARBORICULTURAL JOURNAL, V21, P347
NR 38
TC 16
Z9 19
U1 0
U2 27
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD JUN 15
PY 2015
VL 14
IS 1
BP 65
EP 71
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.009
PG 7
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban Studies
GA CD8HU
UT WOS:000351336600008
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Shi, X
   Zhu, YY
   Duan, J
   Shao, RQ
   Wang, JG
AF Shi, Xing
   Zhu, Yiyu
   Duan, Jin
   Shao, Runqing
   Wang, Jianguo
TI Assessment of pedestrian wind environment in urban planning design
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Pedestrian; Wind; Urban planning; CFD; Assessment
ID comfort; simulation
AB Pedestrian wind environment is one of the urban physical environments that have a significant impact on the overall wellbeing of a city and its dwellers. It is important to be able to assess pedestrian wind environment in the urban planning design stage. Such assessment is intrinsically an in-design assessment and should be based on spatial analysis. The methodology developed considers the probabilistic nature of the assessment by determining an 80-percentile ambient wind speed as the boundary condition for wind environment simulation. The assessing criteria include mechanical comfort, safety, and amplification factor. Their threshold values are based on comparisons of existing criteria. In addition, the concept of tolerance factor, which takes into account the psychological effects of different urban spaces on people, is integrated into the assessment system. The assessment methodology can be used by urban planners in parallel with the process of designing urban physical spaces. A case study of the downtown area of an urban planning project near Lake Tai in China is conducted to demonstrate the application of the assessment methodology. Two limitations of the methodology need to be noted. First, it relies on CFD techniques to obtain the wind environment and therefore, the simulation must be conducted with considerable care and circumspection. Secondly, the methodology does not include the thermal and ventilation effects of pedestrian wind. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Shi, Xing; Wang, Jianguo] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Xing; Wang, Jianguo] Minist Educ, Key Lab Urban & Architectural Heritage Conservat, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Duan, Jin; Shao, Runqing] Southeast Univ, Res Inst Urban Planning & Spaces, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Zhu, Yiyu] Zhejiang Acad Bldg Res & Design Co, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
C3 Southeast University - China; Southeast University - China
RP Shi, X (通讯作者)，Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM shixing_seu@163.com; zhuyiyu@vip.qq.com; seduanjin@263.net; haorunqing@qq.com; wjg-cw@seu.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51138002]
CR Aplin KL, 2012, ATMOS ENVIRON, V50, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.053
   Blocken B, 2008, WIND STRUCT, V11, P51, DOI 10.12989/was.2008.11.1.051
   Blocken B, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V30, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.009
   BLOCKEN B, 2004, J THERMAL ENVELOPE B, V28, P107, DOI 10.1177/1097196304044396
   Bottema M, 1993, THESIS TU EINDHOVEN, V0, P0
   City Population, 1900, ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS, V0, P0
   Davenport AG, 1975, P 4 INT C WIND EFF B, V0, P0
   Davenport AG, 1961, PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS, V19, P449, DOI 10.1680/iicep.1961.11304
   Fowler Kimberly M, 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT, V0, P0
   Franke J, 2011, INT J ENVIRON POLLUT, V44, P419, DOI 10.1504/IJEP.2011.038443
   Gou Z, 2013, FACILITIES, V31, P0
   Gu C, 2012, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V1, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2012.02.013
   Harms F, 2011, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V99, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.007
   Hes D, 2011, 12 C INT BUILD PERF, V0, P0
   Hokoi S, 2013, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V2, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2013.03.001
   Hunt J, 1976, BUILD ENVIRON, V11, P15, DOI 10.1016/0360-1323(76)90015-9
   Janssen WD, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V59, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.012
   Koss HH, 2006, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V94, P781, DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2006.06.005
   LAWSON TV, 1978, J IND AERODYNAM, V3, P93, DOI 10.1016/0167-6105(78)90002-8
   Lawson TV, 1975, P 4 INT C WIND EFF B, V0, P0
   Lefebvre Henri, 2012, THE PRODUCTION OF SPACE, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203124291-13
   Marshall M, 2013, NEW SCI, V217, P8
   MELBOURNE WH, 1978, J IND AERODYNAM, V3, P241, DOI 10.1016/0167-6105(78)90013-2
   Menezes AC, 2012, APPL ENERG, V97, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.075
   Nakayama H, 2012, ATMOS SCI LETT, V13, P180, DOI 10.1002/asl.377
   Penwarden A, 1975, WIND ENVIRONMENT AROUND BUILDINGS. BUILDING RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT REPORT, V0, P0
   Penwarden AD, 1973, BUILDING SCIENCE, V8, P259, DOI 10.1016/0007-3628(73)90008-X
   RATCLIFF MA, 1990, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V36, P791
   Software CRADLE CoLtd, 2013, STREAM, V0, P0
   Soligo MJ, 1998, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V77-8, P753, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00189-5
   Szucs A, 2013, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V2, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2012.12.002
   Tominaga Y, 2008, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V96, P1749, DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058
   U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Office, 2012, ENERGYPLUS ENERGY SIMULATION SOFTWARE-WEATHER DATA, V0, P0
   Wilcox DC, 2006, TURBULENCE MODELLING FOR CFD, V0, P0
   WILLIAMS CJ, 1992, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V44, P2389, DOI 10.1016/0167-6105(92)90029-A
   ZIMRING CM, 1980, ENVIRON BEHAV, V12, P429, DOI 10.1177/0013916580124002
NR 39
TC 60
Z9 65
U1 4
U2 144
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD AUG 15
PY 2015
VL 140
IS 
BP 17
EP 28
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.013
PG 12
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CK3KX
UT WOS:000356116100003
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Koschinsky, J
   Talen, E
AF Koschinsky, Julia
   Talen, Emily
TI From Sprawl to Walkable How Far Is That?
SO RETROFITTING SPRAWL: ADDRESSING SEVENTY YEARS OF FAILED URBAN FORM
LA English
DT Proceedings Paper
ID sustainable neighborhoods evidence; built environment; physical-activity; obesity
C1 [Koschinsky, Julia] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning SGSUP, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Koschinsky, Julia] SGSUPS, GeoDa Ctr Geospatial Anal & Computat, Tempe, AZ USA.
   [Talen, Emily] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Talen, Emily] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe
RP Koschinsky, J (通讯作者)，Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning SGSUP, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
CR Adkins Arlie, 2013, COMMUNICATION 0607, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2010, CHALLENGES POLICY OP, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2014, MONTHLY BULLETIN, V0, P17
   Unknown -, 2010, WALK SCOR METH, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2013, SOFTWARE B NELSON, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2009, NAT HOUS TRAV SURV, V0, P0
   Been Vicki, 2010, BUILDING ENV SUSTAIN, V0, P0
   Brownson RC, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V36, PS99, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
   Ding D, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.021
   Dunton GF, 2009, OBES REV, V10, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00572.x
   Durand CP, 2011, OBES REV, V12, Pe173, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00826.x
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Feng J, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.008
   Foster S, 2008, PREV MED, V47, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017
   Frank LD, 2000, J PLAN EDUC RES, V20, P6, DOI 10.1177/073945600128992564
   Goetz Edward, 2013, AESOP ACSP JOINT C 2, V0, P0
   Harrell Rodney, 2009, PRESERVING AFFORDABILITY AND ACCESS IN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES: SUBSIDIZED HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES NEAR TRANSIT AND THE 50+ POPULATION, V0, P0
   Heath Gregory W, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS55, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s55
   Institute on Race and Poverty, 2007, ACC OPP TWIN CIT MET, V0, P0
   Kneebone E, 2013, CONFRONTING SUBURBAN POVERTY IN AMERICA, V0, P1
   Leinberger CB, 2008, THE OPTION OF URBANISM: INVESTING IN A NEW AMERICAN DREAM, V0, P0
   Leinberger ChristopherB, 2012, WALK THIS WAY: THE ECONOMIC PROMISE OF WALKABLE PLACES IN METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON, V0, P0
   Lipman B, 2006, A HEAVY LOAD: THE COMBINED HOUSING AND TRANSPORTATION BURDENS OF WORKING FAMILIES, V0, P0
   National Association of Realtors, 2011, 2011 COMM PREF SURV, V0, P0
   National Household Travel Survey, 2011, NAT HOUS TRAV SURV, V0, P0
   Pendall R, 2011, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V21, P33, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2010.534388
   PolicyLink, 2002, PROM REG EQ FRAM PAP, V0, P0
   Quigley L, 2010, PRESERVING AFFORDABL, V0, P0
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   Song Y, 2003, J URBAN ECON, V54, P218, DOI 10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00059-7
   Speck Jeff, 2012, WALKABLE CITY DOWNTO, V0, P0
   Talen E, 2011, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V21, P1, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2010.533618
   Talen E, 2010, J URBAN AFF, V32, P489, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00518.x
   Talen Emily, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE LAND USE URBAN PLANNING, V1, P42, DOI 10.24102/ijslup.v1i1.211
   Tu CC, 2001, REAL ESTATE ECON, V29, P485, DOI 10.1111/1080-8620.00019
NR 36
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 1
PU UNIV GEORGIA PRESS
PI ATHENS
PA ATHENS, GA 30602 USA
SN 
EI 
J9 
PD JUN 15
PY 2015
VL 0
IS 
BP 11
EP 29
DI 
PG 19
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA BE9IA
UT WOS:000377581500002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Talavera-Garcia, R
   Soria-Lara, JA
AF Talavera-Garcia, Ruben
   Soria-Lara, Julio A.
TI Q-PLOS, developing an alternative walking index. A method based on urban design quality
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Pedestrian accessibility; Urban design; Design qualities; Public transport; Granada
ID pedestrian level; service; comfort; walkability; environment; hierarchy; street; model
AB The Level of Service (LOS) is a measure to evaluate the degree of accommodation of different transport modes in a given infrastructure (road, railway, street, etc.). While the last decades have seen a growing interest regarding the use of level of service for managing and planning private and public transport infrastructures, shortcomings appear when it is used in the context of pedestrian mobility (i.e. the complexity of pedestrian mobility in terms of behaviour and the consideration of urban design factors associated with pedestrianisation). This paper aims to gain insight into the abovementioned issues by developing an alternative walking index, the Quality of Pedestrian Level of Service (Q-PLOS) method. This novel method is based on the quality of urban design for pedestrian and its relationship with walking needs. The city of Granada (Spain) provided the empirical focus. The paper found that the Q-PLOS was a more accurate measurement of pedestrian mobility characteristics. This was based on the relevance of specific factors linked to urban design together with public preferences about them. Finally, the obtained high-detailed outputs provide a platform to increment the effectiveness of level of service specifically for pedestrians that want to access to a public transport stop. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Talavera-Garcia, Ruben] Univ Granada, Dept Urban & Spatial Planning, E-18071 Granada, Spain.
   [Soria-Lara, Julio A.] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C3 University of Granada; University of Amsterdam
RP Talavera-Garcia, R (通讯作者)，Sch Civil Engn, Dept Urban & Spatial Planning, Campus Fuentenueva SN, Granada 18071, Spain.
EM rtalaverag@ugr.es
FU Regional Government of Andalusia; FEDER [P09-RNM-5394]
CR Adkins A, 2012, J URBAN DES, V17, P499, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2012.706365
   Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Unknown -, 2003, SOC SCI MED, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6
   Unknown -, 2007, MANUAL FOR STREETS, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1996, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2008, J URBAN DES, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1080/13574800701804074
   Asadi-Shekari Z, 2013, TRANSPORT REV, V33, P166, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2013.775613
   Baltes MR, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP125, DOI 10.3141/1818-19
   Cerin E, 2007, CITIES, V24, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.002
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   FRUIN JJ, 1971, METROPOLITAN ASSOCIATION OF URBAN DESIGNERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNERS, V0, P0
   Gallin N, 2001, ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH, V10, P0, DOI 10.1007/S11116-006-9107-3
   Gehl Jan, 1971, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS, V0, P0
   Hickman R, 2010, TRANSPORT POLICY, V17, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.12.002
   Jacobs AllanB, 1993, GREAT STREETS, V1, P0
   Landis BW, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP82, DOI 10.3141/1773-10
   Lee S, 2013, CITIES, V35, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.010
   Manchon LF, 1995, RECOMENDACIONES PARA EL PROYECTO Y DISENO DEL VIARIO URBANO, V0, P0
   MORI M, 1987, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V21, P223, DOI 10.1016/0191-2607(87)90016-1
   Muraleetharan T, 2005, JOURNAL OF THE EASTERN ASIA SOCIETY FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES, V6, P127, DOI 10.11175/EASTS.6.127
   Niemeijer D, 2008, ECOL INDIC, V8, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.11.012
   Nikolopoulou M, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1455, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.031
   Olszewski P, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1927, P38, DOI 10.3141/1927-05
   Peters P, 1981, LA CIUDAD PEATONAL, V0, P0
   Petritsch TA, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP84, DOI 10.3141/1982-12
   Pozueta J, 2009, LA CIUDAD PASEABLE: RECOMENDACIONES PARA UN PLANEAMIENTO, V0, P0
   Salingaros NA, 2005, PRINCIPLES URBAN STR, V0, P0
   Sanz A, 2008, CALMAR EL TRAFICO. PASOS PARA UNA NUEVA CULTURA DE LA MOVILIDAD URBANA, V0, P0
   Sarkar S, 2003, TRANSPORT Q, V57, P39
   Shashua-Bar L, 2000, ENERG BUILDINGS, V31, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
   Stathopoulos T, 2004, BUILD ENVIRON, V39, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.001
   Talavera-Garcia R, 2014, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V60, P161, DOI 10.5565/rev/dag.55
   Transportation Research Board (TRB), 2003, 100 TRB TCRP, V0, P0
   TRB (Transportation Research Board), 2016, HIGHWAY CAPACITY MAN, V0, P0
   Venturi Robert, 1977, LEARNING LAS VEGAS F, V0, P0
NR 42
TC 117
Z9 138
U1 0
U2 63
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUN 15
PY 2015
VL 45
IS 
BP 7
EP 17
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA CI9AP
UT WOS:000355063100002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Stoker, P
   Garfinkel-Castro, A
   Khayesi, M
   Odero, W
   Mwangi, MN
   Peden, M
   Ewing, R
AF Stoker, Philip
   Garfinkel-Castro, Andrea
   Khayesi, Meleckidzedeck
   Odero, Wilson
   Mwangi, Martin N.
   Peden, Margie
   Ewing, Reid
TI Pedestrian Safety and the Built Environment: A Review of the Risk Factors
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE
LA English
DT Article
DE pedestrian safety; risk factors; built environment
ID road traffic injury; walking school bus; individual-differences; developing-country; physical-activity; backpack load; crashes; accidents; children; design
AB Urban and regional planning has a contribution to make toward improving pedestrian safety, particularly in view of the fact that about 273,000 pedestrians were killed in road traffic crashes in 2010. The road is a built environments that should enhance safety and security for pedestrians, but this ideal is not always the case. This article presents an overview of the evidence on the risks that pedestrians face in the built environment. This article shows that design of the roadway and development of different land uses can either increase or reduce pedestrian road traffic injury. Planners need to design or modify the built environment to minimize risk for pedestrians.
C1 [Stoker, Philip; Garfinkel-Castro, Andrea; Ewing, Reid] Univ Utah, City & Metropolitan Planning, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA.
   [Khayesi, Meleckidzedeck; Peden, Margie] World Hlth Org, Dept Violence & Injury Prevent, Geneva, Switzerland.
   [Odero, Wilson] Maseno Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Kisumu, Kenya.
   [Mwangi, Martin N.] Wageningen Univ, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands.
C3 Utah System of Higher Education; University of Utah; World Health Organization; Maseno University; Wageningen University & Research
RP Stoker, P (通讯作者)，Univ Utah, City & Metropolitan Planning, 375 S 1530 E 235 AAC, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA.
EM philip.a.stoker@gmail.com
FU Bloomberg Philanthropies; US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
CR Ackaah W, 2011, INT J INJ CONTROL SA, V18, P21, DOI 10.1080/17457300.2010.487157
   Afukaar Francis K, 2003, INJ CONTROL SAF PROMOT, V10, P69, DOI 10.1076/icsp.10.1.69.14107
   Agran P F, 1998, INJ PREV, V4, P188
   Agran PF, 1996, PEDIATRICS, V98, P1096
   Al-Madani H, 2006, SAFETY SCI, V44, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.10.009
   Anderson RWG, 1997, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V29, P667, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00036-5
   Unknown -, 2008, CHILD-PARENT INTERACTION IN RELATION TO ROAD SAFETY EDUCATION: PART 2-MAIN REPORT, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2005, THESIS GEORGIA I TEC, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2002, PEDESTRIAN FACILITIE, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2004, SURVEILLANCE FOR FATAL AND NONFATAL INJURIES-UNITED STATES, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1998, P C PEDESTRIAN SAFET, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2013, WHO GLOBAL STATUS REPORT ON ROAD SAFETY 2013: SUPPORTING A DECADE OF ACTION, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2009, GLOB STAT REP ROAD S, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1999, POLICE ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES TO REDUCE TRAFFIC CASUALTIES IN EUROPE, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2009, GLOBAL STATUS REPORT ON ROAD SAFELY: TIME FOR ACTION, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2006, RESIDENTIAL STREET T, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2010, 358 COST, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2013, PEDESTRIAN SAFETY RO, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2013, WORLD HLTH REPORT 20, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1900, DOI 10.1016/J, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2010, ROAD CRASH RISK VULN, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1999, 6 I TRANSP ENG INT C, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2003, TRL REPORT TRL 579, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2002, MEASURING SPRAWL ITS, V0, P0
   Assailly JP, 1997, J APPL DEV PSYCHOL, V18, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0193-3973(97)90039-3
   Avineri E, 2012, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V44, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.028
   Azetsop J, 2010, PUBLIC HEALTH ETH-UK, V3, P115, DOI 10.1093/phe/phq013
   Bartels D, 2010, INT J INJ CONTROL SA, V17, P169, DOI 10.1080/17457300903564553
   Barton BK, 2007, J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, V32, P343, DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsl009
   Berger L R, 1996, INJURY CONTROL: A GLOBAL VIEW, V0, P0
   Bhalla K, 2009, INJURY PREV, V15, P150, DOI 10.1136/ip.2008.020826
   Bhatia R, 2011, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V43, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.015
   Bishai D, 2006, HEALTH ECON, V15, P65, DOI 10.1002/hec.1020
   Boarnet MG, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.026
   Branche C, 2008, WORLD REPORT ON CHILD INJURY PREVENTION, V0, P0
   Burden Dan, 1999, ROAD DIETS FIXING THE BIG ROADS, V0, P0
   Campbell BJ, 2004, REV PEDESTRIAN SAFET, V0, P0
   Chakravarthy B, 2010, TRAFFIC INJ PREV, V11, P508, DOI 10.1080/15389588.2010.497546
   Chow DHK, 2005, ERGONOMICS, V48, P642, DOI 10.1080/00140130500070921
   Clifton KJ, 2007, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V39, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2006.11.003
   Collins DCA, 2005, SOC SCI MED, V60, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.015
   Constant A, 2010, PLOS MED, V7, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000228
   Cubbin C, 2002, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V23, P349, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140548
   Dandona R, 2008, INJURY PREV, V14, P354, DOI 10.1136/ip.2008.019620
   Davies D, 1999, RES DEV IMPLEMENTATI, V0, P0
   Delmelle EC, 2012, TRANSPORTATION, V39, P433, DOI 10.1007/s11116-011-9363-8
   Demetriades D, 2004, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V199, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.03.027
   Dumbaugh E, 2011, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V77, P69, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2011.536101
   Durak D, 2008, INJURY, V39, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2007.07.013
   Elvik R, 2009, HANDBOOK OF ROAD SAFETY MEASURES, V0, P1
   Ewing R, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1541, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1541
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Ewing R, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP29, DOI 10.3141/2364-04
   Ewing R, 2009, J PLAN LIT, V23, P347, DOI 10.1177/0885412209335553
   Fitzpatrick K, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, P18
   Gårder PE, 2004, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V36, P533, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00059-9
   Gawryszewski Vilma Pinheiro, 2006, SAO PAULO MED. J., V124, P208, DOI 10.1590/S1516-31802006000400007
   Goren S, 2005, SAUDI MED J, V26, P1116
   Griswold J, 2011, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V43, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.028
   Grundy C, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, P0, DOI 10.1136/bmj.b4469
   Guth D, 2005, HUM FACTORS, V47, P314, DOI 10.1518/0018720054679533
   Harwood DW, 2008, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NCHRP, V0, P17
   Hatfield J, 2007, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V39, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.001
   Hauer Ezra, 1999, SAFETY GEOMETRIC DES, V0, P0
   Heelan KA, 2009, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V6, P560, DOI 10.1123/jpah.6.5.560
   Heimbach C, 1983, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 923, V0, P0
   Híjar M, 2003, SOC SCI MED, V57, P2149, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00067-4
   Hijar Martha, 2003, INJ CONTROL SAF PROMOT, V10, P37, DOI 10.1076/icsp.10.1.37.14108
   Hilton J, 2006, RACE AND ETHNICITY IN FATAL MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC CRASHES 1999-2004, V0, P0
   HOLUBOWYCZ OT, 1995, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V27, P417, DOI 10.1016/0001-4575(94)00064-S
   Huang HF, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, P80
   Ibrahim Jehan M, 2012, J INJ VIOLENCE RES, V4, P65, DOI 10.5249/jivr.v4i2.112
   Ibrahim SE, 2011, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V43, P2153, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2011.06.006
   Jacobsen PL, 2015, INJURY PREV, V21, P271, DOI 10.1136/ip.9.3.205rep
   Kearns RA, 2003, AREA, V35, P285, DOI 10.1111/1475-4762.00177
   Kerr J, 2012, J PLAN LIT, V27, P43, DOI 10.1177/0885412211415283
   Khayesi M, 2010, ANTIPODE, V42, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00733.x
   Kim JK, 2010, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V42, P1751, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.016
   LaFiandra M, 2003, J BIOMECH, V36, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00243-9
   Lamm R, 1999, HIGHWAY DESIGN AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ENGINEERING HANDBOOK, V0, P0
   Langlois JA, 1997, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V87, P393, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.87.3.393
   LaScala E A, 2001, PREV SCI, V2, P123, DOI 10.1023/A:1011547831475
   Li Changcheng, 2010, PROCEEDINGS 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPTOELECTRONICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ICOIP 2010), V0, PP565, DOI 10.1109/ICOIP.2010.113
   Litman T, 2005, SAFE TRAVELS - EVALUATING MOBILITY MANAGEMENT TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPACTS, V0, P0
   Lonero LP, 2006, INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION: BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE THEORIES, V0, P0
   Ma WJ, 2010, SAFETY SCI, V48, P823, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.021
   Marcin JP, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P461, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.3.461
   Marshall WE, 2011, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V43, P769, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.024
   Mead J, 2014, EVALUATION OF PEDESTRIAN-RELATED ROADWAY MEASURES: A SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE RESEARCH, V0, P115
   Mendoza JA, 2009, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-122
   Milton J, 1998, TRANSPORTATION, V25, P395, DOI 10.1023/A:1005095725001
   Moe H, 2008, JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, V11, P22, DOI 10.22452/JUMMEC.VOL11NO1.6
   Mohan D, 1998, REFLECTIONS OF THE TRANSFER OF TRAFFIC SAFETY KNOWLEDGE TO MOTORISING NATIONS, V0, P27
   MUELLER BA, 1988, J TRAUMA, V28, P91, DOI 10.1097/00005373-198801000-00013
   Mutabazi M, 2010, SAFETY SCI, V48, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.10.003
   Nakitto MT, 2008, AFR HEALTH SCI, V8, P156
   Nasar J, 2008, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V40, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.005
   Negrini S, 2002, SPINE, V27, P187, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00014
   Neider MB, 2010, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V42, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.004
   Noland RB, 2004, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V36, P525, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00058-7
   Odero W, 1997, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V2, P445, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1997.d01-296.x
   Odero Wilson, 2003, INJ CONTROL SAF PROMOT, V10, P53, DOI 10.1076/icsp.10.1.53.14103
   Owens DA, 1996, HUM FACTORS, V38, P680, DOI 10.1518/001872096778827233
   Peden M, 2002, BRIT MED J, V324, P1153, DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7346.1153
   Peden M, 2004, WORLD REPORT ROAD TR, V0, P0
   Petch RO, 2000, J TRANSP GEOGR, V8, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00006-5
   Pitcairn TK, 2000, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V91, P391, DOI 10.1348/000712600161899
   PLESS IB, 1989, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V79, P995, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.79.8.995
   Porter G, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P285, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00106-1
   Porter G, 2008, PROGRESS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, V8, P281, DOI 10.1177/146499340800800306
   Retting RA, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1456, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1456
   RIVARA FP, 1985, PEDIATRICS, V76, P375
   ROBERTS I, 1995, BRIT MED J, V310, P91, DOI 10.1136/bmj.310.6972.91
   Roberts I, 1995, INJ PREV, V1, P242, DOI 10.1136/ip.1.4.242
   Rosenbloom S, 2011, WOMENS ISSUES IN TRANSPORTATION: SUMMARY OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, Volum e 1: Conference Overview and Plenary Papers, P63, DOI 10.17226/22901
   Sawalha Z, 2001, J TRANSP ENG-ASCE, V127, P151, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:2(151)
   Schwebel DC, 2012, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V45, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.011
   Seedat M, 2006, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V9, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2005.09.005
   Shah Syed Ghulam Sarwar, 2007, INT J INJ CONTR SAF PROMOT, V14, P231
   SHARPLES PM, 1990, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V301, P1193, DOI 10.1136/bmj.301.6762.1193
   Siram SM, 2011, J SURG RES, V167, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2010.10.007
   Sleet DA, 2011, MAKING HLTH PLACES, V0, P77
   Small TJ, 2006, ANZ J SURG, V76, P43, DOI 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03646.x
   Stavrinos D, 2009, PEDIATRICS, V123, PE179, DOI 10.1542/peds.2008-1382
   Sullivan JM, 2002, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V34, P487, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00046-X
   Tarko A, 2011, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V43, P1689, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.027
   Tom A, 2011, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V43, P1794, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.012
   Ulfarsson GF, 2010, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V42, P1805, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.001
   United Nations, 2013, WORLD POP AG 2013, V0, P0
   VITALIANO DF, 1991, APPL ECON, V23, P373, DOI 10.1080/00036849100000146
   Walker EJ, 2012, SAFETY SCI, V50, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.011
   Wang YT, 2001, ERGONOMICS, V44, P858, DOI 10.1080/00140130110060427
   Whitelegg J, 1993, TRANSPORT SUSTAINABL, V0, P0
   Xiang HY, 2006, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V38, P1064, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.010
   Zahabi SAH, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP81, DOI 10.3141/2247-10
   Zegeer CV, 2012, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V44, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.007
   Zhao H, 2010, INT J CRASHWORTHINES, V15, P313, DOI 10.1080/13588260903335290
NR 170
TC 166
Z9 205
U1 3
U2 141
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0885-4122
EI 1552-6593
J9 J PLAN LIT
JI J. Plan. Lit.
PD NOV 15
PY 2015
VL 30
IS 4
BP 377
EP 392
DI 10.1177/0885412215595438
PG 16
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CU9XI
UT WOS:000363899800002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Forsyth, A
AF Forsyth, Ann
TI What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE walkability; pedestrian; vitality
ID childrens physical-activity; irvine-minnesota inventory; measure built environments; neighborhood walkability; smart growth; body-weight; walking; community; transport; health
AB What exactly is meant by the term 'walkability'? In professional, research and public debates the term is used to refer to several quite different kinds of phenomena. Some discussions focus on environmental features or means of making walkable environments, including areas being traversable, compact, physically enticing and safe. Others deal with outcomes potentially fostered by such environments, such as making places lively, enhancing sustainable transportation options and inducing exercise. Finally some use the term walkability as a proxy for better design whether composed of multiple, measurable dimensions or providing a holistic solution to urban problems. This review both problematizes the idea of walkability and proposes a conceptual framework distinguishing these definitions. This matters for urban design, because what is considered a walkable place varies substantially between definitions leading to substantially different designs. By mapping the range of definitions, this review highlights potential conflicts been forms of walkability.
C1 Harvard Univ, Harvard Grad Sch Design, UPD, Harvard GSD, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
C3 Harvard University
RP Forsyth, A (通讯作者)，Harvard Univ, Harvard Grad Sch Design, UPD, Harvard GSD, 48 Quincy St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
CR Addison C, 2013, J PLAN LIT, V28, P215, DOI 10.1177/0885412212471563
   Al-Hagla KS, 2009, URBAN DES INT, V14, P139, DOI 10.1057/udi.2009.8
   Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Unknown -, 2009, METHODS SYNTHESIS QU, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2010, PEDESTRIANS QUALITY NEEDS PQN; ACTION 358, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1991, IRISH TIMES, V0, P0
   Baranowski T, 2003, OBES RES, V11, P23S, DOI 10.1038/oby.2003.222
   Barton J, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P3947, DOI 10.1021/es903183r
   Bauman AE, 2012, LANCET, V380, P258, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1
   Bentley I, 1985, RESPONSIVE ENV MANUA, V0, P0
   Berke EM, 2007, J AM GERIATR SOC, V55, P526, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01108.x
   Boarnet MG, 2011, ENVIRON BEHAV, V43, P735, DOI 10.1177/0013916510379760
   Boarnet MG, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.018
   Booth A, 2012, SYSTEMATIC APPROACHES TO A SUCCESSFUL REVIEW, V0, P0
   Bowler Diana E, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, P456, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
   Brownson RC, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V36, PS99, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
   Callahan JL, 2014, HUM RESOUR DEV REV, V13, P271, DOI 10.1177/1534484314536705
   Cao XY, 2009, TRANSPORT REV, V29, P359, DOI 10.1080/01441640802539195
   CAPLAN N, 1973, AM PSYCHOL, V28, P199, DOI 10.1037/h0034433
   Carr LJ, 2011, BRIT J SPORT MED, V45, P1144, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.069609
   Carver A, 2008, HEALTH PLACE, V14, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.06.004
   Van Cauwenberg J, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.11.010
   Cerin E, 2006, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V38, P1682, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000227639.83607.4d
   Chaskin RJ, 1997, SOC SERV REV, V71, P521, DOI 10.1086/604277
   Day K, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
   Ding D, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V41, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.036
   Dixon-Woods Mary, 2006, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V6, P35, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
   Durand CP, 2011, OBES REV, V12, Pe173, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00826.x
   Evans D, 2000, AUST J ADV NURS, V18, P33
   Ewing R, 2013, METR PLANN DES, V0, PP1, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9
   Ewing Reid, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS223, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Faulkner GEJ, 2009, PREV MED, V48, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.017
   Forsyth A, 2010, BUILT ENVIRONMENT, V36, P429, DOI 10.2148/BENV.36.4.429
   Forsyth A, 2012, J PLAN LIT, V27, P270, DOI 10.1177/0885412212448101
   Forsyth A, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800701816896
   Foster S, 2008, PREV MED, V47, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Gebel K, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.008
   Gebel K, 2009, ANN BEHAV MED, V37, P228, DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3
   Gehl Jan, 1987, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: USING PUBLIC SPACE, V0, P0
   Giles-Corti B, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
   Giles-Corti B, 2009, SPORTS MED, V39, P995, DOI 10.2165/11319620-000000000-00000
   Grammenos F, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P163, DOI 10.1080/13574800801965643
   Greenberg MR, 2005, J URBAN HEALTH, V82, P90, DOI 10.1093/jurban/jti011
   Hillery GA, 1955, RURAL SOCIOL, V20, P111
   Hodge DR, 2011, J SOC WORK EDUC, V47, P579, DOI 10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000024
   Jacobs J, 1992, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   KAPLAN S, 1995, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V15, P169, DOI 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
   Kerr J, 2012, J PLAN LIT, V27, P43, DOI 10.1177/0885412211415283
   Krambeck HV, 2006, GLOBAL WALKABILITY I, V0, P0
   Lee CM, 2003, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V69, P50, DOI 10.1080/01944360308976293
   Lee MC, 2008, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V5, P930, DOI 10.1123/jpah.5.6.930
   Leinberger ChristopherB, 2012, WALK THIS WAY: THE ECONOMIC PROMISE OF WALKABLE PLACES IN METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON, V0, P0
   Leslie E, 2007, ENVIRON BEHAV, V39, P557, DOI 10.1177/0013916506287358
   Lo RH, 2009, J URBANISM INT RES P, V2, P145, DOI 10.1080/17549170903092867
   Lorenc T, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.001
   Lovasi GS, 2009, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V99, P279, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2008.138230
   Lubans DR, 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-5
   Lyons W, 2012, METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR HEALTHY COMMUNITIES, V0, P0
   Maller C, 2006, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V21, P45, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dai032
   Manaugh K, 2011, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V16, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
   McCormack GR, 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-125
   Mehta V, 2008, J URBANISM INT RES P, V1, P217, DOI 10.1080/17549170802529480
   Miller HJ, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V26, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.007
   Moudon Anne Vernez, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS99, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s99
   Ozbil A, 2011, URBAN DES INT, V16, P125, DOI 10.1057/udi.2011.2
   Pivo G, 2011, REAL ESTATE ECON, V39, P185, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00296.x
   Porta S, 2005, URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, V10, P51, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000136
   Rattan A, 2012, MODELING WALKABILITY, V0, P0
   Rogers SH, 2011, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V6, P201, DOI 10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4
   Rosenberg D, 2009, PREV MED, V49, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.011
   Saelens BE, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1552, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
   Samarasekara GN, 2011, ENVIRON BEHAV, V43, P501, DOI 10.1177/0013916510379350
   Sohn DW, 2012, URBAN DES INT, V17, P115, DOI 10.1057/udi.2012.1
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Southworth M, 1997, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V63, P28, DOI 10.1080/01944369708975722
   Speck Jeff, 2012, WALKABLE CITY, V0, P0
   Stewart O, 2011, J PLAN LIT, V26, P127, DOI 10.1177/0885412210385911
   Sugiyama T, 2012, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V44, P1275, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318247d286
   Talen Emily, 2013, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE LAND USE URBAN PLANNING, V1, P42, DOI 10.24102/ijslup.v1i1.211
   Dyck D, 2009, PREV MED, V48, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.03.005
   van Stralen MM, 2009, HEALTH PSYCHOL REV, V3, P147, DOI 10.1080/17437190903229462
   Wanner M, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V42, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.030
   Wells NM, 2007, ENVIRON BEHAV, V39, P6, DOI 10.1177/0013916506295570
   Whyte W, 2001, SOCIAL LIFE SMALL UR, V0, P0
   Williams Raymond, 1976, KEYWORDS, V0, P0
   Wilson EO, 1975, P1, V0, P0
   Xu F, 2010, J URBAN HEALTH, V87, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11524-009-9409-9
   Zook JB, 2012, ENVIRON BEHAV, V44, P216, DOI 10.1177/0013916511402060
NR 115
TC 350
Z9 479
U1 11
U2 366
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD WIN 15
PY 2015
VL 20
IS 4
BP 274
EP 292
DI 10.1057/udi.2015.22
PG 19
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CW1BV
UT WOS:000364725500002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Cui, JQ
   Allan, A
   Lin, D
AF Cui, Jianqiang
   Allan, Andrew
   Lin, Dong
TI Assessing grade separation pedestrian systems: Planning, design and operation
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Grade separation pedestrian system; skywalk; underground pedestrian system; planning; design; operation
ID underground space; strategy; skywalks; city
AB Grade separation pedestrian systems (GSPS), including skywalk systems and underground pedestrian systems (UPS), have been an emerging phenomenon in the city centres of megacities since early last century. Despite the examples of many successful GSPS in operation around the world, the application and performance of GSPS are not yet well understood by local authorities. This review discusses the functionality of GSPS through an examination of the performance of GSPS in terms of opening hours, facilities for vulnerable populations, signage systems, spatial structure, arrangement of entrances/exits, transportation, safety issues, comfort and amenities. Issues that have emerged from previous discussions in relation to their negative impacts on street life, social inequality of their usage and the privatisation of public spaces of GSPS are also discussed. The review concludes that GSPS have a diversity of functionality in varied urban settings. It also reveals shortcomings in the performance of GSPS. The literature review suggests research aspects that need to be updated, including the lack of empirically based studies, particularly studies from the perspective of the pedestrians using the systems, and a lack of investigation of the functionality of GSPS in cities other than North American cities, in particular, cities with UPS in developing countries.
C1 [Cui, Jianqiang] Griffith Univ, Urban Res Program, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
   [Allan, Andrew; Lin, Dong] Univ S Australia, Sch Nat & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
C3 Griffith University; Adelaide University; University of South Australia
RP Cui, JQ (通讯作者)，Griffith Univ, Urban Res Program, Bldg N78,Room 3-10,170 Kessels Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
EM jj.cui@griffith.edu.au; Andrew.Allan@unisa.edu.au; Dong.Lin@mymail.unisa.edu.au
CR Unknown -, 2005, UNDERGROUND SPACE DE, V0, P0
   Barker M, 1986, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V1, P145, DOI 10.1016/0886-7798(86)90052-0
   Bélanger P, 2007, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V22, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2006.07.005
   BENZ GP, 1983, J TRANSP ENG, V109, P487, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1983)109:4(487)
   Besner J, 2007, 11 ACUUS C 10 13 SEP, V0, P0
   BHALLA MK, 1985, J TRANSP ENG-ASCE, V111, P95, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1985)111:2(95)
   Boisvert M, 2007, 11 ACUUS C 10 13 SEP, V0, P0
   BOIVIN DJ, 1991, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V6, P83, DOI 10.1016/0886-7798(91)90007-Q
   Brown D, 1985, PLANNING, V51, P16
   Byers J, 1998, J PLAN EDUC RES, V17, P189, DOI 10.1177/0739456X9801700301
   Byers J, 1998, THESIS U MINNESOTA, V0, P0
   Corbett MJ, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN B, V36, P711, DOI 10.1068/b34066
   Cui JQ, 2015, INT PLAN STUD, V20, P209, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2014.984662
   Cui JQ, 2013, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V38, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2013.06.004
   Cui JQ, 2012, INT J URBAN SCI, V16, P301, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2012.743744
   Cui JQ, 2013, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V35, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2012.12.009
   Daniels E, 2005, THE NEXT AMERICAN CITY, V9, P8
   Durmisevic S, 2001, CITIES, V18, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00050-0
   Eady RM, 1990, THESIS U MANITOBA WI, V0, P0
   El-Geneidy A M, 2011, J TRANSP LAND USE, V4, P0, DOI 10.5198/JTLU.V4I2.176
   Forusz HN, 1980, THE CINCINNATI SKYWALK, V0, P0
   Fruin JohnJ, 1987, PEDESTRIAN PLANNING AND DESIGN, V0, P0
   Gosling David, 1992, CITIES, V9, P34
   GRAVA S, 2002, URBAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, V0, P0
   He L, 2012, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V32, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.008
   Itabashi H, 2007, 11 ACUUS C 10 13 SEP, V0, P0
   Kaufman S, 1985, THE SKYWAY CITIES, V0, P0
   Maitland B, 1992, CITIES, V9, P162, DOI 10.1016/0264-2751(92)90012-T
   Montgomery MR, 1999, PUBLIC CHOICE, V99, P403, DOI 10.1023/A:1018301628084
   Mumford Lewis, 1961, THE CITY IN HISTORY: ITS ORIGINS, V0, P0
   Newman P, 1999, SUSTAINABILITY CITIE, V0, P0
   Robertson KA, 1987, CITIES, V4, P207, DOI 10.1016/0264-2751(87)90029-1
   Robertson KA, 1993, TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, V64, P273
   ROBERTSON KA, 1993, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V59, P361, DOI 10.1080/01944369308975887
   ROBERTSON KA, 1988, TRANSPORT Q, V42, P457
   ROBERTSON KA, 1995, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V61, P429, DOI 10.1080/01944369508975655
   ROBERTSON KA, 1987, LANDSCAPE, V29, P43
   Ronka K, 1998, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V13, P39, DOI 10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00029-7
   Sijpkes P, 1997, 7 ACUUS C 29 SEPT 3, V0, P0
   Sterling R, 1997, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V12, P479, DOI 10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00007-8
   Sterling RL, 1996, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V11, P263, DOI 10.1016/0886-7798(96)00021-1
   Terranova CN, 2009, URBAN HIST REV, V37, P18, DOI 10.7202/029574ar
   Tong L, 1998, UNDERGROUND SHOPPING, V0, P0
   Toronto City Council, 2009, TOR WALK STRAT, V0, P0
   Toronto City Council, 2009, STEPS WALK CIT PROP, V0, P0
   Wan SW-S, 2007, ANN M ASS AM GEOGR 1, V0, P0
   Wang Y, 2010, URBAN PLANNING INTERNATIONAL, V25, P95, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2010.01.017
   Warkentin J, 2010, PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES, V13, P58
   Xu LQ, 2000, NEW ARCHITECTURE, V04, P18
   Zacharias J, 2004, UNDERGROUND SPACE, V24, P268
   Zacharias J, 2007, URBAN PLAN. INT, V6, P35
NR 54
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 0
U2 32
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD AUG 15
PY 2015
VL 20
IS 3
BP 241
EP 252
DI 10.1057/udi.2015.8
PG 12
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CO9PT
UT WOS:000359508400004
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Parthasarathi, P
   Hochmair, H
   Levinson, D
AF Parthasarathi, Pavithra
   Hochmair, Hartwig
   Levinson, David
TI Street network structure and household activity spaces
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE activity spaces; household spatial patterns; network structure; space-time framework; travel behaviour
ID spatial structure; time; road; travel; behavior
AB This research analyses the influence of street network structure on household travel patterns, as measured by activity spaces. The analysis uses street network and travel survey data from the Minneapolis - St. Paul (Twin Cities) and Miami - Ft. Lauderdale (South Florida) metropolitan areas. Various measures of street network structure are used to quantify street network structure. The activity space polygon for each household in the travel survey data set is identified by combining the destinations reached by all household members on the given travel day including the household location. Statistical regression models are then estimated for each study area to test the relationship between street network structure and household activity space. The results show that network structure has a significant influence on household travel patterns, after controlling for other non-network variables such as accessibility to jobs and shops, and car ownership.
C1 [Parthasarathi, Pavithra] CDM Smith, New Haven, CT 06510 USA.
   [Hochmair, Hartwig] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
   [Levinson, David] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; University of Florida; University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities
RP Parthasarathi, P (通讯作者)，CDM Smith, 900 Chapel St Suite 1450, New Haven, CT 06510 USA.
EM pavi0006@umn.edu
CR Anderson P, 2013, T GIS, V17, P683, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12024
   Unknown -, 2006, ACCESS TO DESTINATIONS: DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES, V0, P0
   Cerda A, 2009, 89 ANN M TRANSP RES, V0, P0
   Cox W, 2013, CHINA FREEWAYS CONTI, V0, P0
   Daganzo CF, 2010, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V44, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2009.11.001
   de Smith MJ, 2007, GEOSPATIAL ANAL COMP, V0, P0
   Erath A, 2009, NETW SPAT ECON, V9, P379, DOI 10.1007/s11067-008-9074-7
   Fan YL, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP98, DOI 10.3141/2082-12
   Faulkner W, 1961, REIVERS REMINISCENCE, V0, P0
   Florida Department of Transportation, 1999, SE FLOR TRAV SURV, V0, P0
   Gastner MT, 2006, EUR PHYS J B, V49, P247, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00046-8
   Gauthier, 1966, THESIS NW U, V0, P0
   Hagerstrand T, 1970, ANDSOILMEASUREMENT DATA, V24, P6, DOI 10.1007/BF01936872
   Haggett P, 1969, NETWORK ANAL GEOGRAP, V0, P0
   Harding C, 2013, 92 ANN M TRANSP RES, V0, P0
   Hochmair HH, 2015, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V9, P15, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2012.719998
   HORTON FE, 1971, ECON GEOGR, V47, P36, DOI 10.2307/143224
   Jacques C, 2013, TRANSPORTATION, V40, P625, DOI 10.1007/s11116-012-9437-2
   Jenelius E, 2009, J TRANSP GEOGR, V17, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.06.002
   Jiang B, 2007, PHYSICA A, V384, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2007.05.064
   JOHNSTON RJ, 1972, ECON GEOGR, V48, P199, DOI 10.2307/142876
   Kansky K, 1963, RESEARCH PAPER NO. 84, V0, P0
   KISSLING CC, 1969, CAN GEOGR, V13, P113, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1969.tb00501.x
   Kwan MP, 2000, AREA, V32, P145, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2000.tb00125.x
   LECLAIR SW, 1981, PERS GUID J, V59, P643, DOI 10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00494.x
   Levinson D, 2010, 201009 MN RC, V0, P0
   Levinson D, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029721
   Levinson D, 2009, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V39, P732, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.07.003
   Levinson David, 2013, ACCESS ACROSS AMERICA: ACCESS TO DESTINATIONS: REPORT #13, V0, P0
   Lleras Christy, 2005, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SOCIAL MOVEMENT, V3, P25, DOI 10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00483-7
   Marshall S, 2005, STREETS AND PATTERNS, V0, P0
   Marshall WE, 2010, URBAN DES INT, V15, P133, DOI 10.1057/udi.2009.31
   Metropolitan Council, 2003, 2000 TRAV BEH INV HO, V0, P0
   Miller HJ, 2005, GEOGR ANAL, V37, P17, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2005.00575.x
   Newsome TH, 1998, TRANSPORTATION, V25, P357, DOI 10.1023/A:1005082827030
   Parthasarathi P, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077718
   Parthasarathi P, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN B, V39, P137, DOI 10.1068/b36139
   Patuelli R, 2010, JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE, V2, P5, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.v2i3.23
   Rodrigue J, 2012, LENGTH INTERSTATE HI, V0, P0
   Rodrigue Jean-Paul, 2006, GEOGRAPHY TRANSPORT, V3rd, P0
   Schonfelder S, 2004, ARBEITSBERICHTE VERKEHRS-UND RAUMPLANUNG, V0, P258
   Schonfelder S, 2003, ACTIVITY SPACES: MEASURES OF SOCIAL EXCLUSION?, V10, P273, DOI 10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2003.07.002
   Schrank D, 2012, 2012 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT, V0, P0
   Sherman Jill E, 2005, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V4, P24, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-4-24
   Smith MS, 2011, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V45, P1846, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.003
   Stopher PR, 2010, 12 WORLD C TRANSP RE, V0, P0
   Swanson K, 2012, BICYCLING AND WALKING IN THE UNITED STATES: 2012 BENCHMARKING REPORT, V0, P0
   Taaffe E, 1996, GEOGRAPHY TRANSPORTA, V2nd, P0
   Timmermans HJP, 2009, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V43, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.004
   USEPA, 2013, TRANSP CLIM, V0, P0
   United States Census Bureau, 2010, AM COMM SURV 2010, V0, P0
   Urry J, 2003, BRIT J SOCIOL, V54, P155, DOI 10.1080/0007131032000080186
   *US CENS BUR, 2008, TOP INT GEOGR ENC RE, V0, P0
   Vallée J, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P838, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.009
   Wright S, 1934, ANN MATH STAT, V5, P161, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177732676
   Xie F, 2007, SIMULATOR ULTRA CONN, V0, P0
   Xie F, 2007, GEOGR ANAL, V39, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00707.x
   Xie F, 2011, TRANSP RES ECON POL, V0, PP3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9804-0
   Yang C, 2009, P 2 INT C TRANSP ENG, V0, P3639
NR 60
TC 30
Z9 37
U1 2
U2 54
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD MAY 15
PY 2015
VL 52
IS 6
BP 1090
EP 1112
DI 10.1177/0042098014537956
PG 23
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA CE5EG
UT WOS:000351852700006
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Cho, GH
   Rodriguez, D
AF Cho, Gi-Hyoug
   Rodriguez, Daniel
TI Location or design? Associations between neighbourhood location, built environment and walking
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE neighbourhood location; obesity; physical activity; transport; walking
ID physical-activity; land-use; residential density; urban design; travel; health; behavior; impacts; choice; form
AB In examining the association between environmental exposures and walking, conducting research on a neighbourhood scale has been the dominant approach whereas the association of the regional-scale environment with behaviours has rarely been explored. Because regional location and neighbourhood built environment attributes are likely to be correlated, the findings in neighbourhood-scale studies may be biased. In contrast to existing literature, this study is based on the assumption that a neighbourhood's location may be associated with walking or physical activity and that this association may be separately identifiable from the influence of the neighbourhood built environment on behaviours. The findings indicated that residing in a highly urban location had a consistently positive association with walking and transportation-purpose physical activity when the neighbourhood built environment and individuals' socio-demographic factors were controlled. Meanwhile the inclusion of the neighbourhood location variable did not result in significant changes to the models for recreation-purpose activity.
C1 [Cho, Gi-Hyoug] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol, Ulsan 689798, South Korea.
   [Rodriguez, Daniel] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA.
C3 Ulsan National Institute of Science & Technology (UNIST); University of North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
RP Cho, GH (通讯作者)，Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol, Urban & Environm Engn, 801-7,50 UNIST Gil, Ulsan 689798, South Korea.
EM gicho@unist.ac.kr
FU Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Active Living Research program [049862]
CR Ainsworth BE, 2000, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V32, PS498, DOI 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009
   Aytur SA, 2007, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P397, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.397
   Badland H, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2004.12.001
   Banerjee T, 1984, BEYOND NEIGHBOURHOOD, V0, P0
   Baradran S, 2001, J TRANSPORTATION STA, V0, P31
   Boarnet MG, 2008, J PLAN EDUC RES, V27, P341, DOI 10.1177/0739456X07311073
   Brown BB, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V33, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.06.002
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Cervero R, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P475, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976767
   Chatman DG, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P1072, DOI 10.1068/a4114
   Cho E, 2008, J TRANSP LAND USE, V1, P121, DOI 10.5198/JTLU.V1I2.65
   Cho GH, 2011, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V43, P365, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ebec3c
   Congress for the New Urbanism Natural Resources Defense Council and the USGreen Building Council, 2009, LEED 2009 NEIGHB DEV, V0, P0
   Coogan MA, 2007, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P363, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.363
   Duany Andres, 1991, TOWNS AND TOWN-MAKING PRINCIPLES, V0, P0
   Ewing R, 2009, MEASURING THE IMPACT OF URBAN FORM AND TRANSIT ACCESS ON MIXED USE SITE TRIP GENERATION RATES-PORTLAND PILOT STUDY, V0, P0
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Forsyth A, 2007, ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY: GIS PROTOCOLS. VOLUME VERSION 4.1, V0, P0
   Forsyth A, 2007, URBAN STUD, V44, P679, DOI 10.1080/00420980601184729
   Frank LD, 2001, J PLAN LIT, V16, P202, DOI 10.1177/08854120122093339
   Giles-Corti B, 2002, PREV MED, V35, P601, DOI 10.1006/pmed.2002.1115
   Grant J, 2006, PLANNING THE GOOD COMMUNITY: NEW URBANISM IN THEORY AND PRACTICE, V0, P0
   Guo Z, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P461, DOI 10.1068/b33074
   Handy S, 1993, REGIONAL VERSUS LOCAL ACCESSIBILITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR NON-WORK TRAVEL, V0, P0
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Hillier B, 2002, URBAN DES INT, V7, P181
   Kitamura R, 1997, TRANSPORTATION, V24, P125, DOI 10.1023/A:1017959825565
   Lee C, 2004, J PLAN LIT, V19, P147, DOI 10.1177/0885412204267680
   Lee C, 2007, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P293, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.293
   Lee C, 2006, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V16, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.03.003
   Leyden KM, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1546, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
   McDonald NC, 2008, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V22, P433, DOI 10.4278/ajhp.22.6.433
   Mertes JD, 1995, PARK, V0, P0
   Metropolitan Council, 2006, 2030 METR FRAM, V0, P0
   Næss P, 2005, PROG PLANN, V63, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2004.08.003
   Nunnally JC, 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, V2nd, P0
   Oakes J Michael, 2007, EPIDEMIOL PERSPECT INNOV, V4, P16, DOI 10.1186/1742-5573-4-16
   Owen N, 2004, AM J PREV MED, V27, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006
   Rodríguez DA, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P43, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976723
   Rodríguez DA, 2004, TRANSPORT REV, V24, P587, DOI 10.1080/0144164042000195081
   Rodríguez DA, 2008, PREV MED, V47, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.028
   Rodríguez DA, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V37, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.008
   Rodríguez DA, 2009, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V43, P560, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2009.02.003
   Rutt CD, 2005, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, P257, DOI 10.1123/JPAH.2.3.257
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   SMALL KA, 1994, J URBAN ECON, V36, P292, DOI 10.1006/juec.1994.1037
   Song Y, 2007, J URBAN DES, V12, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574800601072640
   Southworth M, 1997, STREETS SHAPING TOWN, V0, P0
   Suminski RR, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.009
   Targa F, 2005, J. TRANSP. STAT, V8, P55
   Troped PJ, 2003, PREV MED, V37, P304, DOI 10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00137-3
   United States Department of Transportation, 2008, TRANSP STAT ANN REP, V0, P0
   Van Acker V, 2007, TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN, V30, P331, DOI 10.1080/03081060701461675
   van Wee B, 2002, EUROPEAN J TRANSPORT, V2, P305, DOI 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
NR 54
TC 21
Z9 25
U1 0
U2 55
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD JUN 15
PY 2015
VL 52
IS 8
BP 1434
EP 1453
DI 10.1177/0042098014537691
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA CG6MP
UT WOS:000353415700005
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Abulibdeh, AO
   Zaidan, E
   Abuelgasim, A
AF Abulibdeh, Ammar O.
   Zaidan, Esmat
   Abuelgasim, Abdelgadir
TI Urban Form and Travel Behavior as Tools to Assess Sustainable Transportation in the Greater Toronto Area
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
ID policy
AB The objective of this study is to examine whether the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) is moving toward or away from sustainable transportation through exploring the spatial and temporal changes of urban form and travel behavior, related policies and responses to these changes during the period between 1986 and 2006. Transportation services and infrastructure in the GTA are regulated by different governing bodies and at different scales and levels. Support for sustainable transportation initiatives has varied across governments and over time. It is important at this point to review the main initiatives taken by different governing bodies over the last several decades to achieve sustainable transportation in the GTA. By analyzing the Transportation Tomorrow Survey data through the last two decades, it can be determined whether these initiatives have been successful in making transportation in the GTA more sustainable or, alternatively, whether more measures should be taken to achieve transportation sustainability. The major finding of this study is that, overall, the GTA is not moving in the direction of sustainable transportation, and gives credence to the idea that demand-management interventions are needed as a transport policy to make transportation systems more sustainable in this area. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
C1 [Abulibdeh, Ammar O.] Univ Waterloo, Dept Geog & Environm Management, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
   [Zaidan, Esmat; Abuelgasim, Abdelgadir] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Geog, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates.
C3 University of Waterloo; United Arab Emirates University
RP Abulibdeh, AO (通讯作者)，Univ Waterloo, Dept Geog & Environm Management, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
EM ammar_abulibdeh@hotmail.com; esmat.zaidan@uaeu.ac.ae; a.abuelgasim@uaeu.ac.ae
CR Unknown -, 2008, 2006, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE, V1, P0
   Black, 2010, SUSTAINABLE TRANSPOR, V0, P0
   Centre for Sustainable Transportation, 2005, DEF SUST TRANSP, V0, P0
   City of Toronto, 2009, COM NEXT GEN TRANSP, V0, P0
   Data Management Group, 2008, VERS 1 0 DAT GUID, V0, P0
   Dudson Brian, 1998, TRANSPORTATION QUARTERLY, V52, P103
   Filion P, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN A, V38, P1367, DOI 10.1068/a37414
   Geurs K, 2004, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH, V4, P333, DOI 10.18757/EJTIR.2004.4.3.4272
   Gordon D, 1991, STEERING NEW COURSE, V0, P0
   Government of Ontario, 2006, SO ONT HIGHW PROGR 2, V0, P0
   Hatzopoulou M, 2008, TRANSPORT POLICY, V15, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.12.002
   IBI, 2007, TRANSP TRENDS OUTL G, V0, P0
   Jeon CM, 2006, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V132, P172, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:3(172)
   Kennedy CA, 2002, TRANSPORTATION, V29, P459, DOI 10.1023/A:1016302913909
   Lindsey R, 2008, BROOKINGS WHARTON PA, V3, P235
   Litman T, 2017, INTRODUCTION TO MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING: PRINCIPLE AND PRACTICES, V0, P0
   Lo L, 2011, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V137, P470, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000080
   MacKenzie James J, 1994, THE KEYS TO THE CAR: ELECTRIC AND HYDROGEN VEHICLES FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, V0, P0
   Maoh H, 2009, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V33, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.10.004
   Metrolinx, 2008, DEV REG TRANSP PLAN, V0, P0
   Metrolinx, 2008, COST ROAD CONG GREAT, V0, P0
   Metrolinx, 2008, 4 METR, V0, P0
   MetroLinx, 2008, BIG MOV TRANSF TRANS, V0, P0
   Meyer MD, 1999, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V33, P575, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00008-7
   Miller EJ, 2003, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V129, P1, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2003)129:1(1)
   Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal, 2008, BUILT BOUND GROWTH P, V0, P0
   Newman PWG, 1996, LAND USE POLICY, V13, P1, DOI 10.1016/0264-8377(95)00027-5
   OECD, 1996, OECD P VANC C GOV CA, V0, P0
   Pushkarev B, 1997, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATIO, V0, P0
   Sperling Daniel, 1995, FUTURE DRIVE ELECT V, V0, P0
   Spinney JEL, 2009, TRANSPORT POLICY, V16, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.01.002
   Stewart G, 1997, ENERG POLICY, V25, P1203, DOI 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00122-5
   Taylor Z, 2008, SHAPING THE TORONTO REGION, V0, Present
   Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS), 2006, DAT MAN GROUP, V0, P0
   Urban Strategies, 2005, APPL LAND US INT TAR, V0, P0
   Weaver R, 1965, PLANNED COMMUNITIES, V0, P1
   Wheeler S, 2003, LOCAL ENVIRON, V8, P317, DOI 10.1080/13549830306656
NR 38
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 0
U2 35
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD SEP 15
PY 2015
VL 141
IS 3
BP 
EP 
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000227
PG 16
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CP5TG
UT WOS:000359946800010
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Kim, H
AF Kim, Hyungkyoo
TI Walking distance, route choice, and activities while walking: A record of following pedestrians from transit stations in the San Francisco Bay area
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE walking distance; route choice; pedestrian activities; transit station area; following pedestrians
ID built environment; trip purpose; path choice; land-use; travel; behavior; features; streets; demand; city
AB With the goal of making more walkable urban environments, studies on pedestrian behavior heavily rely on surveys or are increasingly using global positioning system tracking as the main vehicle of collecting data. Alternatively, this study adopts following pedestrians, a direct observation method, to examine pedestrians' walking distance, route choice, and activities while walking from transit stations. Following 139 pedestrians from Glen Park and Rockridge BART stations in the San Francisco Bay Area to their final destinations on weekday afternoons suggests three major findings. Pedestrians walked 548 m on average and up to 1100 m, exceeding 1/4 mile (400 m), a rule-of-thumb distance frequently implemented in practice. Seventy-five per cent of the pedestrians walked along the main streets and twenty-nine per cent chose to walk longer routes. Seventy-four per cent of them engaged in various activities while walking, including shopping, window shopping, conversing with others and using street furniture. This study provides not only quantitative findings that are consistent with those from similar studies, but also descriptive information about pedestrian behavior, which they rarely do.
C1 Singapore Univ Technol & Design, Lee Kuan Yew Ctr Innovat Cities, Singapore 487372, Singapore.
C3 Singapore University of Technology & Design
RP Kim, H (通讯作者)，Singapore Univ Technol & Design, Lee Kuan Yew Ctr Innovat Cities, 8 Somapah Rd, Singapore 487372, Singapore.
EM gusailsang@gmail.com
CR Agrawal AW, 2007, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V12, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.005
   Alfonzo M, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P29, DOI 10.1080/13574800701803456
   Unknown -, 2008, J URBAN DES, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1080/13574800701804074
   Appleyard D, 1981, LIVABLE STREETS, V0, P0
   Asakura Y, 2007, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V41, P684, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2006.07.003
   BORGERS A, 1986, GEOGR ANAL, V18, P115
   Borst HC, 2009, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V29, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.002
   Bosselmann P, 1999, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V65, P168, DOI 10.1080/01944369908976045
   Brown BB, 2007, ENVIRON BEHAV, V39, P34, DOI 10.1177/0013916506295569
   Buchanan C, 1963, TRAFFIC TOWNS STUDY, V0, P0
   Calthorpe P, 1993, THE NEXT AMERICAN METROPOLIS: ECOLOGY, V0, P0
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Cho GH, 2011, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V43, P365, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ebec3c
   Creswell JohnW, 2018, JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, V0, P0
   Dittmar H, 2003, THE NEW TRANSIT TOWN: BEST PRACTICES IN TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT, V0, P0
   Dumbaugh E, 2005, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V71, P283, DOI 10.1080/01944360508976699
   Duncan MJ, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V33, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.042
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   FRUIN JJ, 1971, METROPOLITAN ASSOCIATION OF URBAN DESIGNERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNERS, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 2004, PUBLIC SPACES, V0, PPUBLIC LIFE
   Gehl Jan, 1987, LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: USING PUBLIC SPACE, V0, P0
   Guo Z, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P461, DOI 10.1068/b33074
   Guo Z, 2013, J TRANSP GEOGR, V28, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.013
   Guo Z, 2009, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V14, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2009.03.007
   Hess P, 1999, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1674, P9, DOI 10.3141/1674-02
   Hillier B, 2004, URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, V9, P31, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000079
   JACOBS A, 1987, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V53, P112, DOI 10.1080/01944368708976642
   Jacobs AllanB, 2002, THE BOULEVARD BOOK: HISTORY, V0, P0
   Jacobs J, 1992, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Kelbaugh D, 1989, PEDESTRIAN POCKET BO, V0, P0
   Lee C, 2006, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V11, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003
   Macdonald Elizabeth, 2002, JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, V7, P117, DOI 10.1080/1357480022000012203
   Marcus ClareC, 1998, PEOPLE PLACES DESIGN, V0, P0
   Moiseeva A, 2010, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V17, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.03.011
   OSullivan S, 1996, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, V1538, P19, DOI 10.3141/1538-03
   Park S, 2008, THESIS U CALIFORNIA, V0, P0
   Perry Clarence, 1929, REGIONAL PLAN NEW YO, V7, P22
   Pushkarev Boris, 1975, URBAN SPACE PEDESTRI, V0, P0
   Rudofsky Bernard, 1969, STREETS PEOPLE PRIME, V0, P0
   Seneviratne PN, 1985, TRANSPORT PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, V10, P147, DOI 10.1080/03081068508717309
   Shoval N, 2006, PROF GEOGR, V58, P172, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00524.x
   Sisiopiku VP, 2003, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F, V6, P249, DOI 10.1016/J.TRF.2003.06.001
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Southworth M, 1997, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V63, P28, DOI 10.1080/01944369708975722
   Southworth M, 1997, STREETS SHAPING TOWN, V0, P0
   Speck Jeff, 2012, WALKABLE CITY DOWNTO, V0, P0
   TIMMERMANS H, 1992, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V26, P45, DOI 10.1016/0191-2615(92)90019-S
   Tuan Yi-Fu, 1977, SPACE AND PLACE: THE PERSPECTIVE OF EXPERIENCE, V0, P0
   Untermann R, 1984, ACCOMMODATING PEDEST, V0, P0
   Whyte W, 2001, SOCIAL LIFE SMALL UR, V0, P0
   Wiehe SE, 2008, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V7, P0, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-7-22
   Wolf J, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, P125
   Yang Y, 2012, AM J PREV MED, V43, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015
   Yin RK, 2009, CASE STUDIES DESIGN, V4th, P0
NR 62
TC 33
Z9 39
U1 0
U2 60
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD SUM 15
PY 2015
VL 20
IS 2
BP 144
EP 157
DI 10.1057/udi.2015.2
PG 14
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CJ1KC
UT WOS:000355241500005
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Curl, A
   Thompson, CW
   Aspinall, P
AF Curl, Angela
   Thompson, Catharine Ward
   Aspinall, Peter
TI The effectiveness of 'shared space' residential street interventions on self-reported activity levels and quality of life for older people
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Shared space; Older people; Quality of life; Physical activity
ID environment; model; health; well; age
AB The role of the built environment in facilitating physical activity is well recognised. However, longitudinal studies into the effects of changes to the built environment on levels of activity and quality of life outcomes are lacking, especially for older people. This paper presents results from a longitudinal study of 'home zone' style changes to residential streets, designed to make streets more 'liveable' by reducing the dominance of vehicular traffic and creating shared space. The interventions were focused in deprived areas, where the changes followed an inclusive, community-led approach. The intervention sites were matched with comparison sites receiving no intervention. Whilst existing studies into the outcomes of home zone type interventions have tended to focus on tangible measures such as road casualties or traffic speeds, this study examines broader, self-reported behavioural (i.e. activity levels and perceptions), health and quality of life outcomes. Results were gathered pre-intervention in 2008 and then, post-intervention, in 2010 or 2011 for participants aged 65 or older. They show that interventions are associated with a significant improvement in perceptions of how easy it is to walk on the street near home. Participants also considered that they were significantly more active post-intervention. However, there was less evidence of positive change in health, quality of life, frequency of activities outdoors, time spent outdoors, or better social connectedness. One potential reason is that a greater time period post-implementation is needed for such outcomes to become manifest. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Curl, Angela; Thompson, Catharine Ward] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Coll Art, OPENSPACE Res Ctr, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland.
   [Aspinall, Peter] Heriot Watt Univ, OPENSPACE Res Ctr, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland.
   [Aspinall, Peter] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Built Environm, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland.
C3 Edinburgh College of Art; University of Edinburgh; Heriot Watt University; Heriot Watt University
RP Curl, A (通讯作者)，Univ Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RS, Lanark, Scotland.
EM angela.curl@glasgow.ac.uk; c.ward-thompson@ed.ac.uk; p.a.aspinall@hw.ac.uk
FU UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D079861/1]; EPSRC [EP/D079861/1] Funding Source: UKRI; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D079861/1] Funding Source: researchfish
CR Andel J Van, 1985, CHILDRENS ENVIRONMENT QUARTERLY, V1, P46
   Unknown -, 2010, AM STAT ASS PROC, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2009, SCOTTISH INDEX OF MULTIPLE DEPRIVATION: 2009 GENERAL REPORT, V0, P0
   BENJOSEPH E, 1995, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V61, P504, DOI 10.1080/01944369508975661
   Biddulph M, 2003, JOURNAL OF URBAN DESIGN, V8, P217
   Biddulph M, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P199, DOI 10.1080/01944361003622688
   Biddulph M, 2008, URBAN DES INT, V13, P121, DOI 10.1057/udi.2008.11
   Van Cauwenberg J, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.11.010
   Clayden A, 2006, J URBAN DES, V11, P55, DOI 10.1080/13574800500490307
   Day R, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P2658, DOI 10.1068/a43109
   Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), 2007, IND DEPR 2007, V0, P0
   Department for Transport (Dff), 2005, HOM ZON CHALL FUT OU, V0, P0
   Gill Tim, 2006, CHILDREN, V0, P0
   Hamilton-Baillie B, 2008, BUILT ENV, V34, P21
   Hyde M, 2003, AGING MENT HEALTH, V7, P186, DOI 10.1080/1360786031000101157
   Imrie R, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P2260, DOI 10.1068/a44595
   JETTE AM, 1986, J GEN INTERN MED, V1, P143, DOI 10.1007/BF02602324
   Lawton MP, 1973, PSYCHOLOGY OF ADULT DEVELOPMENT AND AGING, V0, PP619, DOI 10.1037/10044-020
   Magidson J, 2013, NEW PERSPECTIVES PAR, V0, P0
   MARCUS BH, 1994, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V26, P1400
   Morrison DS, 2004, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V58, P837, DOI 10.1136/jech.2003.017509
   Nordbakke S, 2014, MOBILITIES-UK, V9, P104, DOI 10.1080/17450101.2013.784542
   Nuzzo R, 2014, NATURE, V506, P150, DOI 10.1038/506150a
   Ogilvie D, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, P0, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-703
   Saelens BE, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, PS550, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   Schwanen T, 2011, AGEING SOC, V31, P719, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X10001467
   Ståhl A, 2013, TRANSPORT POLICY, V27, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.015
   Sugiyama T, 2009, ENVIRON BEHAV, V41, P3, DOI 10.1177/0013916507311688
   Sustrans, 2013, WHAT IS DIY STREETS, V0, P0
   Tabachnick BG, 2007, USING MULTIVARIABLE STATISTICS, V5th, P0
   Thompson CW, 2014, BRIT J SPORT MED, V48, P0, DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091718
   Wahl HW, 2012, GERONTOLOGIST, V52, P306, DOI 10.1093/geront/gnr154
   Ward Thompson C, 2013, J ENV PSYCHOL, V0, P0
   Webster D, 2006, TRL654 DEP TRANSP TR, V0, P0
   Welsh Assembly Government, 2005, WELSH IND MULT DEPR, V0, P0
   Yaffe K, 2001, ARCH INTERN MED, V161, P1703, DOI 10.1001/archinte.161.14.1703
NR 37
TC 43
Z9 56
U1 2
U2 96
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD JUL 15
PY 2015
VL 139
IS 
BP 117
EP 125
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.019
PG 9
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CJ2ZM
UT WOS:000355353200010
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Yu, CY
AF Yu, Chia-Yuan
TI How Differences in Roadways Affect School Travel Safety
SO JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
LA English
DT Article
DE school travel safety; built environment; school siting; traffic safety; neighborhood planning
ID urban form; new-york; active transportation; built environment; injury severity; motor-vehicle; neighborhood; routes; crashes; collisions
AB Problem, research strategy, and findings: Three children 14 and younger are killed daily in the United States and almost 500 more are injured in traffic crashes, often while traveling to or from school. Previous studies examine the effect of built environmental characteristics on school travel safety, but are limited. I simultaneously evaluate the impact of street segment-level and neighborhood-level design characteristics on crashes involving elementary school-aged child pedestrians during school travel time around 78 elementary schools in Austin (TX). I find that more school travel-related collisions happen on highways and interstates and arterial roads and where there are traffic-generating land uses and transit stops. Fewer crashes occur on local roads and when there are connected sidewalks. Unfortunately, I do not consider microlevel features of the built environment; more-over, the crash data may include children's crashes not related to school travel.Takeaway for practice: Planners should collaborate with a wide variety of agencies and organizations at different levels of government as well as with parents and neighborhood residents to create pedestrian-friendly schools that reduce or overcome current barriers to safe, human-powered school travel. Planners should address both current school safety problems at existing schools and help ensure better school siting and complementary planning and transportation decisions in the future.
C1 Univ Cent Florida, Urban & Reg Planning Program, Orlando, FL 32816 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; University of Central Florida
RP Yu, CY (通讯作者)，Univ Cent Florida, Urban & Reg Planning Program, Orlando, FL 32816 USA.
EM Chia-Yuan.Yu@ucf.edu
CR Abdel-Aty M, 2007, J SAFETY RES, V38, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.04.006
   Aiken L S, 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2012, TRAFF SAF FACTS 2010, V0, P0
   Aziz HMA, 2013, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V50, P1298, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.034
   Bennet SA, 2015, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V78, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.001
   Boarnet MG, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.026
   Box PC, 1969, PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEM, V34, P18
   Chen L, 2012, 92 ANN M TRANSP RES, V0, P0
   Clifton KJ, 2007, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V39, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2006.11.003
   Clifton KJ, 2009, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V14, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2009.01.001
   Cooner SA, 2003, TRAFFIC OPERATIONS S, V0, P0
   DHaese S, 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V8, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-88
   Dai DJ, 2010, WEST J EMERG MED, V11, P294
   Desapriya E, 2011, INJURY PREV, V17, P4, DOI 10.1136/ip.2010.026914
   DiMaggio C, 2013, PEDIATRICS, V131, P290, DOI 10.1542/peds.2012-2182
   Elias W, 2014, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V62, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.035
   Ewing R, 2009, J PLAN LIT, V23, P347, DOI 10.1177/0885412209335553
   Federal Highway Administration, 2011, FHWAHRT11039, V0, P0
   Federal Highway Administration, 2010, FHWASA10020, V0, P0
   Federal Highway Administration, 2013, FHWAHRT13099, V0, P0
   Gattis JL, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP38, DOI 10.3141/2348-05
   Haleem K, 2015, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V81, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.025
   Helai H, 2008, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V40, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.002
   Hussein M, 2015, 94 ANN M TRANSP RES, V0, P0
   Jermprapai K, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP109, DOI 10.3141/2464-14
   Kim DG, 2007, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V39, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.011
   Koopmans JM, 2015, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V77, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.005
   LaScala EA, 2000, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V32, P651, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00100-1
   LaScala EA, 2004, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V36, P569, DOI 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00063-0
   Lawhon LL, 2009, J PLAN HIST, V8, P111, DOI 10.1177/1538513208327072
   Maas CJM, 2005, METHODOLOGY, V1, P86, DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
   Mannering F, 2014, ANAL METHODS ACCID R, V1, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.amar.2013.09.001
   McDonald NC, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P153, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.956654
   McDonald NC, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V41, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.006
   McDonald NC, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P184, DOI 10.1080/01944361003595991
   McDonald NC, 2009, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V75, P331, DOI 10.1080/01944360902988794
   McMillan TE, 2005, J PLAN LIT, V19, P440, DOI 10.1177/0885412204274173
   McMillan TE, 2007, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V41, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.011
   Mitra R, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V20, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.009
   Mohamed MG, 2013, SAFETY SCI, V54, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.11.001
   National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, 2007, INT SCH HLTH COMM DE, V0, P0
   National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2014, 811888 DOT HS NAT HI, V0, P0
   National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2015, HS812514 DOT NAT HIG, V0, P0
   National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2014, 811813 DOT HS NAT HI, V0, P0
   Neckerman KM, 2009, J PUBLIC HEALTH POL, V30, PS264, DOI 10.1057/jphp.2008.47
   Nelson NM, 2010, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V7, P257, DOI 10.1123/jpah.7.2.257
   Orenstein MR, 2007, SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL SAFETY AND MOBILITY ANALYSIS, V0, P0
   PERRY CA, 1929, MONOGRAPH COMMITTEE, V1, P0
   Samuel S, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP139, DOI 10.3141/2393-16
   Shawky MA, 2014, ADVANCES IN TRANSPORTATION STUDIES, V1, P27
   Snijders TA, 2011, MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS: AN INTRODUCTION TO BASIC AND ADVANCED MULTILEVEL MODELING, V0, P0
   Stewart O, 2011, J PLAN LIT, V26, P127, DOI 10.1177/0885412210385911
   Talen E, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P121, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1067573
   Texas Department of Transportation, 2014, ROADW DES MAN, V0, P0
   Texas Transportation Institute, 2014, FHWATX13067021 TEX T, V0, P0
   Timperio A, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.047
   Trapp GSA, 2012, HEALTH EDUC BEHAV, V39, P172, DOI 10.1177/1090198111423272
   Ukkusuri S, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP98, DOI 10.3141/2237-11
   Vasudevan V, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP44, DOI 10.3141/2264-06
   Warsh J, 2009, INJURY PREV, V15, P226, DOI 10.1136/ip.2008.020446
   Zhao Y, 2013, 92 ANN M TRANSP RES, V0, P0
   Zhu XM, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V34, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.024
NR 63
TC 39
Z9 53
U1 2
U2 57
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0194-4363
EI 1939-0130
J9 J AM PLANN ASSOC
JI J. Am. Plan. Assoc.
PD JUL 3
PY 2015
VL 81
IS 3
BP 203
EP 220
DI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1080599
PG 18
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CS5PE
UT WOS:000362129400004
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Kang, CD
AF Kang, Chang-Deok
TI The effects of spatial accessibility and centrality to land use on walking in Seoul, Korea
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Spatial accessibility; Centrality; Land use; Walking; Seoul
ID urban form; space syntax; travel; density; choice; environment; prices; retail; market; model
AB The debate on pedestrian-friendly urban structures has increased interest in the connections among land use, accessibility, and pedestrian volume. Most econometric models have focused on the individual and separate effects of density, land-use patterns, and street connectivity on the spatial variation of walking. This study investigates the effects of spatial accessibility and centrality by land-use types on pedestrian presence in Seoul in 2009. The model employs four newly developed accessibility indices and identifies the differentiated effects of land-use accessibility and centrality on pedestrian volume, controlling for street features, location and transportation characteristics, and neighborhood land-use attributes. The model results confirm that the effects of land-use accessibility and centrality vary with the spatial distribution of pedestrians. This analysis highlights the importance of investigating accessibility effects by land-use volume. Indeed, policies on pedestrian-friendly urban structures should consider local contexts as well as the complex relationship between land-use accessibility and walking. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 Chung Ang Univ, Dept Urban Planning & Real Estate, Seoul 156756, South Korea.
C3 Chung Ang University
RP Kang, CD (通讯作者)，Chung Ang Univ, Dept Urban Planning & Real Estate, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 156756, South Korea.
EM cdkang@cau.ac.kr
CR Adair A, 2000, HOUSING STUD, V15, P699, DOI 10.1080/02673030050134565
   Agrawal AW, 2007, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V12, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.005
   Baran PK, 2008, J URBAN DES, V13, P5, DOI 10.1080/13574800701803498
   Barthélemy M, 2009, NETW SPAT ECON, V9, P401, DOI 10.1007/s11067-008-9068-5
   Bhat C, 2000, URBAN ACCESSIBILITY, V0, P0
   Boarnet MarlonGary, 2001, TRAVEL BY DESIGN THE INFLUENCE OF URBAN FORM ON TRAVEL, V0, P0
   Caschili S, 2013, CITIES, V30, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.007
   CASSEL E, 1985, J URBAN ECON, V18, P135, DOI 10.1016/0094-1190(85)90012-9
   Cerin E, 2007, CITIES, V24, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.002
   Cervero R, 1996, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V30, P361, DOI 10.1016/0965-8564(95)00033-X
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Cervero R, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1478, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
   Cervero R, 2005, ACCESSIBLE CITIES RE, V0, P0
   Cervero R, 2009, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V3, P203, DOI 10.1080/15568310802178314
   Chiaradia A, 2013, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V166, P176, DOI 10.1680/udap.10.00030
   Crane R, 1998, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V3, P225, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-7
   Duncan M, 2010, URBAN STUD, V48, P1
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP87, DOI 10.3141/1780-10
   Ewing R, 1995, TRANSPORT Q, V49, P15
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Frank LD, 1994, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1466, P37, DOI 10.1073/PNAS.1100480108
   Franklin JP, 2003, P TRANSP RES BOARD 8, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 2011, LIFE BUILDINGS USING, V0, P0
   Geurs KT, 2004, J TRANSP GEOGR, V12, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Giles-Corti B, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
   Handy SL, 1997, ENVIRON PLANN A, V29, P1175, DOI 10.1068/a291175
   Handy Susan, 2003, PLANNING STREET CONN, V0, P0
   HANSEN WG, 1959, J AM I PLANNERS, V25, P73, DOI 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Hess P, 1999, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1674, P9, DOI 10.3141/1674-02
   Hillier B, 2007, SPACE IS MACHINE, V0, P0
   Holtzclaw J, 1994, USING RESIDENTIAL PA, V0, P0
   HUFF DL, 1963, LAND ECON, V39, P81, DOI 10.2307/3144521
   Lee C, 2006, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V11, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003
   Lopez-Zetina J, 2006, HEALTH PLACE, V12, P656, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.09.001
   McConville ME, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V40, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.023
   Moudon AV, 1997, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP48, DOI 10.3141/1578-07
   Newman MEJ, 2004, PHYS REV E, V69, P0, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133
   Osland L, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN A, V40, P2490, DOI 10.1068/a39305
   Ozbil A, 2011, URBAN DES INT, V16, P125, DOI 10.1057/udi.2011.2
   PEPONIS J, 1989, EKISTICS, V56, P43
   Peponis J, 2002, HDB ENV PSYCHOL, V0, P271
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Porta S, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN B, V36, P450, DOI 10.1068/b34098
   Rabe-Hesketh S, 2008, MULTILEVEL LONGITUDI, V0, P0
   Reggiani A, 2011, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V34, P230, DOI 10.1177/0160017610387296
   Sevtsuk A, 2012, URBAN NETWORK ANAL T, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.3166/RIG.22.287-305
   Sevtsuk A, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P374, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14550401
   Sevtsuk Andres, 2010, PATH PLACE STUDY URB, V0, P0
   Shyr O, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P2553, DOI 10.1177/0042098012474510
   Song Y, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P210, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976371
   Song Y, 2007, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V14, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.07.002
   Srour IM, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, P25
   Sung HG, 2013, CITIES, V35, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.010
   Tierney S, 2005, NASACR2005213522, V0, P0
   Turner A, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN B, V34, P539, DOI 10.1068/b32067
   Waddell P, 2003, 82 ANN M TRANSP RES, V63, P0
   Wang FH, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.004
   Xiao Y, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P112, DOI 10.1177/0042098014560500
NR 66
TC 78
Z9 90
U1 1
U2 92
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD AUG 15
PY 2015
VL 46
IS 
BP 94
EP 103
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.006
PG 10
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA CL1VY
UT WOS:000356734200011
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Tiwari, R
AF Tiwari, Reena
TI Designing a safe walkable city
SO URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE safety against crime; walkability; built form design; sustainable transport
ID crime; fear
AB This article presents findings of a pilot study conducted by Curtin University Australia and EMBARQ India, with an objective of exploring safety concerns of people while accessing metro stations. Increasingly, the notion of improved walkability to increase public transport patronage has been gaining momentum. Some physical-environmental features such as providing Accessibility and Safety against crime are fundamental in contributing to walkability.
C1 Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Perth 6485, WA, Australia.
C3 Curtin University
RP Tiwari, R (通讯作者)，Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Bentley Campus, Perth 6485, WA, Australia.
EM r.tiwari@curtin.edu.au
CR Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Foster S, 2010, HEALTH PLACE, V16, P1156, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.07.007
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Hillier Bill, 1988, THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF SPACE, V0, P0
   Kearns RA, 2003, SPACE POLITY., V7, P193, DOI 10.1080/1356257032000133937
   Kelling GeorgeL, 1996, FIXING BROKEN WINDOWS: RESTORING ORDER AND REDUCING CRIME IN OUR COMMUNITIES, V0, P0
   Kumar P, 2007, THE VALUE OF DESIGN A STUDY OF PEDESTRIAN PERCEPTION IN NEW DELHI, V0, P0
   Li FZ, 2005, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V59, P558, DOI 10.1136/jech.2004.028399
   Litman ToddAlexander, 2011, EC VALUE WALKABILITY, V0, P0
   Mehta V, 2008, JOURNAL OF URBANISM: INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ON PLACEMAKING AND URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, V1, P217, DOI 10.1080/17549170802529480
   MERRY SE, 1981, URBAN AFF REV, V16, P397, DOI 10.1177/107808748101600401
   NASAR JL, 1993, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V13, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2
   Newman Oscar, 1972, DEFENSIBLE SPACE CRI, V0, P0
   Newton AD, 2004, W CRIMINOLOGY REV, V5, P25
   Peponis J, 2002, HDB ENV PSYCHOL, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.1002/hipo.20298
   Southworth M, 2003, STREETS SHAPING TOWN, V0, P0
   White GF, 1990, JUSTICE Q, V7, P57, DOI 10.1080/07418829000090471
NR 25
TC 14
Z9 20
U1 0
U2 50
PU PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
PI BASINGSTOKE
PA BRUNEL RD BLDG, HOUNDMILLS, BASINGSTOKE RG21 6XS, HANTS, ENGLAND
SN 1357-5317
EI 1468-4519
J9 URBAN DES INT
JI Urban Des. Int.
PD SPR 15
PY 2015
VL 20
IS 1
BP 12
EP 27
DI 10.1057/udi.2013.33
PG 16
WC Architecture; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Architecture; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CA4PN
UT WOS:000348887200002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Hajrasouliha, A
   Yin, L
AF Hajrasouliha, Amir
   Yin, Li
TI The impact of street network connectivity on pedestrian volume
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE physical connectivity; space syntax; visual connectivity; walkability
ID physical-activity; built environment; travel behavior; urban form; space syntax; walking; rejoinder; design; audit
AB This paper investigates the impact of street network connectivity on pedestrian volume. Street network connectivity measured in most current studies captures only the metric characteristics of streets or physical connectivity. A whole different type of connectivity, visual connectivity, is largely ignored. Described in basic terms, higher physical connectivity means shorter travel time to reach the same number of destinations while higher visual connectivity means fewer turns to see the same number of destinations. Despite the correlation of these two connectivity constructs, studying both physical and visual connectivity is essential to better understand the role of street network on pedestrian activity. Using pedestrian counts of 302 street segments in Buffalo, New York, structural equation modelling highlights the multiple relationships between street network connectivity, built environment characteristics, and pedestrian volumes. Our findings suggest that both the conventional metric-based measure of physical connectivity and geometric-based measure of visual connectivity have significant positive impacts on pedestrian volumes, together with job density and land use mix. This outcome can encourage practitioners to pay attention to both the geometry of street network and its metric characteristics in order to create a pedestrian-friendly environment.
C1 [Hajrasouliha, Amir] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
   [Yin, Li] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA.
C3 Utah System of Higher Education; University of Utah; State University of New York (SUNY) System; University at Buffalo, SUNY
RP Hajrasouliha, A (通讯作者)，Univ Utah, City & Metropolitan Planning, 375 S 1530 E RM 235, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
EM a.hajrasouliha@utah.edu
CR Byrne BM, 2010, STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING: OPERATION AND APPLICATION OF AMOS, V2nd, P0, DOI 10.4324/9781410600219
   Cao X, 2007, TRANSPORTATION, V34, P535, DOI 10.1007/s11116-007-9132-x
   Carmona M, 2010, PUBLIC PLACES URBAN, VSecond, P0
   Carr LJ, 2011, BRIT J SPORT MED, V45, P1144, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.069609
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Cervero R, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1478, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
   Cervero R, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P400, DOI 10.1068/a4236
   Clifton KJ, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   Conzen MRG, 1960, ALNWICK, V0, P0
   Ewing R, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP175, DOI 10.3141/1831-20
   Ewing R, 2000, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, P75
   Ewing R, 2001, TRANSPORTATION RES P, V35, P823, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00019-7
   Ewing R, 2013, TRANSP RES BOARD 92, V0, P0
   Ewing Reid, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS223, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Frank LD, 1994, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD: JOURNAL OF THE TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD, V1466, P37, DOI 10.1073/PNAS.1100480108
   Frank LD, 2008, PREV MED, V47, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.04.004
   Frank LD, 2004, AM J PREV MED, V27, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   Handy S, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002
   Handy SL, 1992, BUILD ENVIRON, V18, P253
   Handy SL, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P64, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
   Handy Susan, 2003, PLANNING STREET CONN, V0, P0
   Heath Gregory W, 2006, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V3, PS55, DOI 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s55
   Hillier B, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3693, P475
   Hillier B, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P501, DOI 10.1068/b3019a
   Hillier B, 2010, J. SPACE SYNTAX, V2, P258
   Hillier B, 2009, C COMPL THEOR CIT HA, V0, P0
   Hillier B, 1996, URBAN DES INT, V1, P41, DOI 10.1057/udi.1996.5
   Hillier Bill, 2007, PROGRESSIN PLANNING, V67, P205, DOI 10.1016/J.PROGRESS.2007.03.001
   Hillier Bill, 1988, THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF SPACE, V0, P0
   Hoyle RH, 2012, HANDBOOK OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING, V0, P0
   Kerr J, 2007, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V12, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2007.01.006
   Khattak AJ, 2005, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V39, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.009
   Lee C, 2006, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V11, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2006.02.003
   Lee S, 2013, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V7, P238, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2013.710146
   Maghelal Praveen K, 2011, URISA JOURNAL, V23, P5
   Moudon AV, 2007, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V21, P448, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-21.5.448
   Moudon AV, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P21, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21
   Pivo G, 2011, REAL ESTATE ECON, V39, P185, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00296.x
   Raford N, 2010, THE JOURNAL OF SPACE SYNTAX, V1, P230
   Rajamani J, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP158, DOI 10.3141/1831-18
   Ratti C, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P487, DOI 10.1068/b3019
   Ratti C, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P513, DOI 10.1068/b3019b
   Rutt CD, 2005, PREV MED, V40, P831, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.035
   Shriver K, 1996, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1578, P64, DOI 10.3141/1578-09
   Turner A, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN B, V34, P539, DOI 10.1068/b32067
   Ullman JB, 2001, HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY, VSecond, P0
   Yin L, 2013, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V139, P166, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000147
NR 53
TC 135
Z9 160
U1 2
U2 121
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD OCT 15
PY 2015
VL 52
IS 13
BP 2483
EP 2497
DI 10.1177/0042098014544763
PG 15
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA CR1WY
UT WOS:000361117200011
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Babb, C
   Curtis, C
AF Babb, Courtney
   Curtis, Carey
TI Institutional practices and planning for walking: A focus on built environment audits
SO PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE
LA English
DT Article
DE walking; built environment audits; audit culture; automobility
ID behavior-change; physical-environment; climate-change; mobility; transportation; construction; society; culture; policy; world
AB Built environment audits, part of the "toolbox" for planning multi-modal urban transport systems, are used to evaluate the walkability of streets. Whereas the methodological features of audits have attracted attention from planning research, little attention has been paid to the institutional contexts where audits are developed and used. Drawing on literature on audit culture in contemporary institutions and on expert interviews with audit developers and professionals in Australia and New Zealand working with walking audits, three questions are addressed: Who uses walkability audits? How are they used? What substantive changes emerge from auditing practice? The knowledge of practice of auditing the built environment for walking is underdeveloped. While planners, engineers and advocates consider built environment audits useful in different ways, of concern is the use of audits to rationalise limited resources already devoted to infrastructure for walking, rather than produce substantive changes to the quality of the built environment for walking.
C1 [Babb, Courtney; Curtis, Carey] Curtin Univ, Dept Geog & Planning, Perth, WA, Australia.
C3 Curtin University
RP Babb, C (通讯作者)，Curtin Univ, Dept Geog & Planning, Perth, WA, Australia.
EM C.Babb@curtin.edu.au
FU Australian Research Council [DP1094495]; Australian Research Council [DP1094495] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
CR Alfonzo MA, 2005, ENVIRON BEHAV, V37, P808, DOI 10.1177/0013916504274016
   Unknown -, 2012, INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS FOR SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT, V0, P0
   Unknown -, 2010, RIGHTS PASSAGE SIDEW, V0, P0
   Banister D, 2002, TRANSPORT PLANNING, V0, P0
   Banister D, 2008, TRANSPORT POLICY, V15, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Beckmann J, 2004, THEOR CULT SOC, V21, P81, DOI 10.1177/0263276404046062
   Blomley N, 2007, URBAN STUD, V44, P1697, DOI 10.1080/00420980701427507
   Booth C, 2001, TRANSPORT POLICY, V8, P141, DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00004-X
   Boyatzis RE, 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITATIVE INFORMATION: THEMATIC ANALYSIS AND CODE DEVELOPMENT, V0, P0
   Brög W, 2009, TRANSPORT POLICY, V16, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.003
   Christian H, 2013, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V103, P1219, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301230
   Clifton KJ, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   Curtis C, 2008, URBAN DES INT, V13, P105, DOI 10.1057/udi.2008.10
   Day K, 2006, AM J PREV MED, V30, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
   Dudley G, 1996, JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, V3, P63, DOI 10.1080/13501769608407018
   Fischer F, 2003, REFRAMING PUBLIC POLICY: DISCURSIVE POLITICS AND DELIBERATIVE PRACTICES, V0, P0
   Gehl Jan, 2010, CITIES FOR PEOPLE, V0, P0
   Giles-Corti B, 2002, SOC SCI MED, V54, P1793, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00150-2
   Gleeson B, 2000, URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, V18, P7, DOI 10.1080/08111140008727821
   Gray R, 2002, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V27, P687, DOI 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00003-9
   HAAS PM, 1992, INT ORGAN, V46, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Hagman O, 2006, MOBILITIES, V1, P63, DOI 10.1080/17450100500489247
   Hoehner CM, 2006, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V12, P270
   Ingold T, 2011, BEING ALIVE: ESSAYS ON MOVEMENT, V0, P1
   Kent JL, 2014, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V65, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.009
   Kim S, 2013, INT J URBAN SCI, V17, P304
   Lewis F, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P44, DOI 10.1177/1473095211408056
   Lyons RA, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, P0, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060158
   MacCallum D, 2008, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V9, P325, DOI 10.1080/14649350802277852
   Martin George, 2002, CAPITALISM NATURE SOCIALISM, V13, P3
   McMillan TE, 2010, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V7, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-7-20
   Mees P, 2014, AUST PLAN, V51, P66, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2013.795179
   Mees Paul, 2010, TRANSPORT SUBURBIA A, V0, P0, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781849774659
   Mitra R, 2013, TRANSPORT REV, V33, P21, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2012.743490
   Moudon AV, 2003, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P21, DOI 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21
   Patton JW, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN A, V39, P928, DOI 10.1068/a389
   Pikora TJ, 2002, AM J PREV MED, V23, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
   Porter L, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P529, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2013.853470
   Porter TheodoreM, 1995, TRUST NUMBERS, Vfirst, P0, DOI 10.23943/princeton/9780691208411.001.0001
   Power M, 2004, HUM RELAT, V57, P765, DOI 10.1177/0018726704044955
   Power M, 1997, ACCOUNT ORG SOC, V22, P123, DOI 10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00037-2
   Power M, 1995, CRIT PERSPECT ACCOUN, V6, P317, DOI 10.1006/CPAC.1995.1029
   Richards R, 2010, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V7, P0, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-7-5
   RIETVELD P, 2004, BARRIERS SUSTAINABLE, V0, P0
   Rose E, 2009, KOTUITUI, V4, P191, DOI 10.1080/1177083X.2009.9522454
   Rydin Y, 2007, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V8, P363, DOI 10.1080/14649350701514686
   Saladana J, 2012, THE CODING MANUAL FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCHERS, V0, P0
   Schwanen T, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V24, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.003
   Shore C, 1999, J ROY ANTHROPOL INST, V5, P557, DOI 10.2307/2661148
   Shore C, 2008, ANTHROPOL THEOR, V8, P278, DOI 10.1177/1463499608093815
   Shoup DonaldC, 2011, THE HIGH COST OF FREE PARKING, V0, P0
   Shove E, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P1273, DOI 10.1068/a42282
   Southworth M, 2005, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V131, P246, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
   Spence C, 2009, CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, V20, P205, DOI 10.1016/J.CPA.2007.06.003
   Steg L, 2005, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V39, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
   Taylor MAP, 2003, TRANSPORT POLICY, V10, P165, DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00018-0
   Tiesdell S, 2011, URBAN DESIGN IN THE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, V0, P0
   Urry J, 2004, THEOR CULT SOC, V21, P25, DOI 10.1177/0263276404046059
   Webb J, 2012, SOCIOLOGY, V46, P109, DOI 10.1177/0038038511419196
   Whitelegg John, 1997, CRITICAL MASS TRANSP, V0, P0
NR 65
TC 7
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 26
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1464-9357
EI 1470-000X
J9 PLAN THEORY PRACT
JI Plan. Theory Pract.
PD JUN 15
PY 2015
VL 16
IS 4
BP 517
EP 534
DI 10.1080/14649357.2015.1084361
PG 18
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA V69MS
UT WOS:000211443700005
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Wang, YP
   Zacharias, J
AF Wang, Yupeng
   Zacharias, John
TI Landscape modification for ambient environmental improvement in central business districts - A case from Beijing
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Mega-projects; Simulation; Traffic volume; Urban environment; Urban vegetation
ID urban heat-island; induced travel; air-quality; land-use; model; transportation; urbanization; vegetation; capacity; surfaces
AB Hundreds of large central business district (CBD) developments are in planning or development in China and other developing countries. Poor environmental performance in these large projects is thought to result from a lack of understanding of basic engineering requirements, especially transport-related. Large energy demand and air pollution are the obvious consequences. While many studies have focused on functional, symbolic and aesthetic requirements of these developments, environmental engineering has in general been neglected. In this study, a typical large-scale planned CBD in Beijing was investigated just several years after its completion and occupancy. The current transportation requirements of the development were measured. It was found that the road traffic provision exceeded demand. Redesign of road infrastructure and urban greening were evaluated for their contribution to alleviating heat stress in summer, providing a comfortable walking and living environment. Reducing the under-used road infrastructure, without affecting the traffic flow, would allow more space for urban vegetation. In particular, the thermal environment for pedestrians in the whole area could be substantially improved through the redesign of ground-level space. Using ENVI-met microclimate fluid dynamic model to measure the impact of greater green landscape area, it was found that the median air temperature (T-a) could be reduced by as much as 0.5 degrees C. The environmental advantages increase with time, as the tree canopies grow. In the micro-scaled simulation (300 x 600 m), the T-a was reduced by 1 degrees C. That is to say, urban summer T-a mitigation could be achieved if such effective modification schemes were expanded from the micro-scale urban community to the whole city. This research provides support for the use of urban landscape greening as a means to improve environmental conditions and energy demands in large-scale commercial urban development. Reducing redundant road infrastructure and improving the walking environment with urban greening could potentially suppress motorized traffic demand growth and contribute to a more sustainable urban environment. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
C1 [Wang, Yupeng; Zacharias, John] Peking Univ, Lab Urban Proc Modeling & Applicat, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University
RP Wang, YP (通讯作者)，1350 Rue DuFort,Apt 1201, Montreal, PQ H3H 2R7, Canada.
EM wangyupeng0628@gmail.com
CR Akbari H, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
   Akbari H, 2009, COOLING OUR COMMUNIT, V0, P0
   Amirjamshidi G, 2013, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V18, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2012.08.003
   [白志鹏 Bai Zhipeng], 2006, 环境污染与防治 ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION & CONTROL, V28, P198
   Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry, 2000, GEN INV LANDSC GREEN, V0, P0
   Boyce D, 2007, NETW SPAT ECON, V7, P99, DOI 10.1007/s11067-006-9009-0
   Bruse Michael, 2004, ENVI MET 30 UPDATED, V0, P0
   Buchanan Colin, 1963, TRAFFIC IN TOWNS, V0, P0
   Cairns S, 2002, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V151, P13
   Cairns S, 1998, TRAFFIC IMPACT HIGHW, V0, P0
   Cervero R, 2003, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V69, P145, DOI 10.1080/01944360308976303
   Dannecker RKW, 2002, WIND ENERGY JOURNAL, V5, P53, DOI 10.1002/WE.60
   DeFries R, 2010, LAND USE POLICY, V27, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.003
   Dimoudi A, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P69, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00081-6
   ENO Transportation Foundation, 2002, P FOR WASH DC, V0, P0
   Gellert PK, 2003, INT SOC SCI J, V55, P15, DOI 10.1111/1468-2451.5501002
   Gill SE, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V33, P115, DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115
   Goodwin P, 2003, APPL ECON, V35, P1451, DOI 10.1080/0003684032000089872
   Goodwin PB, 1996, TRANSPORTATION, V23, P35
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Hung T, 2006, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V8, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2005.05.003
   Jie Z, 2003, CITY PLANN REV, V2003, P40
   Kalnay E, 2003, NATURE, V423, P528, DOI 10.1038/nature01675
   Kaplan R, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P507, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973115
   KAPLAN R, 1993, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V26, P193, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90016-7
   Kataoka K, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P3112, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.015
   Leng PS, 2004, J. BEIJING AGRIC. COLL, V0, P25
   Li X, 2011, RES CONT OPEN SPACE, V0, P0
   Li Y, 2004, CHIN LANDSC ARCHIT, V1, P72
   Matzka J, 1999, ATMOS ENVIRON, V33, P4565, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00229-0
   McDonald AG, 2007, ATMOS ENVIRON, V41, P8455, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.025
   Mokhtarian PL, 2002, TRANSPORTATION, V29, P193, DOI 10.1023/A:1014221024304
   Noland RB, 2001, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V35, P47, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00047-6
   Noland RB, 2002, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V7, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00009-8
   Nowak DJ, 2007, URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY IN THE NORTHEAST, V0, PP25, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-4289-8_2
   Nowak DJ, 1994, CHICAGOS URBAN FORES, V0, P63
   Ozkeresteci I, 2003, P 21 INT CART C ICC, V0, P402
   Park M, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V56, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.015
   Park RobertE, 1984, THE CITY: SUGGESTIONS FOR THE STUDY OF HUMAN NATURE IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT, V0, P0
   Peng SS, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P696, DOI 10.1021/es2030438
   Pianuan K, 1994, TDRI Q. REV., V9, P20
   Prakash AB, 2001, APPL ECON, V33, P1579, DOI 10.1080/00036840010013617
   Qing S, 2008, BEIJING LANDSCAPE, V2, P26
   Rao PC, 2014, BEIJING NEWS 0109, V0, P0
   Ren GY, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, P0, DOI 10.1029/2006GL027927
   SACTRA, 1994, TRUNKS ROADS GEN TRA, V0, P0
   Sassen S, 2001, THE NEW LONDON CITY JESTER, V0, P0
   Schoner J, 2014, TRB 2014 ANN M, V0, P0
   Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM), 2013, TRANSP CIT, V0, P0
   Smargiassi A, 2005, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V338, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.07.013
   Streutker DR, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V85, P282, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00007-5
   Sun H, 2014, RESOUR DEV MARKET, V30, P687
   Taha H, 1997, ATMOS ENVIRON, V31, P1667, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00336-6
   Takano T, 2002, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V56, P913, DOI 10.1136/jech.56.12.913
   Takebayashi H, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P2971, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.017
   Tam ML, 2000, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V34, P145, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00070-6
   Tennoy A, 2010, TRANSPORT POLICY, V17, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.011
   Transportation Research Board, 2000, HIGHW CAP MAN, V0, P0
   Ulrich RS, 2001, DESIGN HLTH P 2 INT, V0, P49
   VERDERBER S, 1986, ENVIRON BEHAV, V18, P450, DOI 10.1177/0013916586184002
   Wey WM, 2013, HABITAT INT, V38, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.004
   Wier M, 2009, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V41, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2008.10.001
   Xiao RB, 2007, J ENVIRON SCI-CHINA, V19, P250, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60041-2
   Yang J, 2005, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V3, P65
   Yeh AGO, 2002, ENVIRON PLANN B, V29, P431, DOI 10.1068/b1288
   Yu E, 2007, J ENV HLTH, V24, P999, DOI 10.16241/j.cnki.1001-5914.2007.12.034
   Zacharias J, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P296, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973007
   Zhan WJ, 2013, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V27, P353, DOI 10.1007/s00477-012-0603-z
   [张自银 Zhang Ziyin], 2011, 应用气象学报 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLGICAL SCIENCE, V22, P760
   Zhou LM, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P9540, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0400357101
NR 70
TC 68
Z9 77
U1 2
U2 134
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD JUN 15
PY 2015
VL 14
IS 1
BP 8
EP 18
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.005
PG 11
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban Studies
GA CD8HU
UT WOS:000351336600002
DA 2026-05-02
ER

PT J
AU Marquet, O
   Miralles-Guasch, C
AF Marquet, Oriol
   Miralles-Guasch, Carme
TI The Walkable city and the importance of the proximity environments for Barcelona's everyday mobility
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Proximity; Everyday mobility; Pedestrians; Neighborhood; Walkability
ID built environment; social exclusion; transport; distance; population; density; design; travel; trips; life
AB To evaluate the importance of walkable environments and neighborhood's vitality in people's everyday life, this paper analyzes proximity travel in Barcelona. Data were taken from one of the major mobility surveys in Spain, which offers the depth required to identify short walking journeys that take place within the neighborhood scale. By analyzing people's mobility patterns, we get a more accurate approach to proximity and inner-neighborhood dynamics. The analysis focuses on the frequency and purpose of these short walking trips, along with the urban settings that foster them. The study also evaluates how proximity trips are unequally distributed throughout the city and how income and population density levels can effectively promote this kind of traveling behavior. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Marquet, Oriol; Miralles-Guasch, Carme] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Geog, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain.
   [Miralles-Guasch, Carme] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain.
C3 Autonomous University of Barcelona; Autonomous University of Barcelona
RP Marquet, O (通讯作者)，Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Geog, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain.
EM Oriol.marquet@uab.cat; carme.miralles@uab.cat
CR Alshalalfah BW, 2007, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V133, P114, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2007)133:2(114)
   Autoritat de Transport Metropolita and Generalitat de Catalunya, 2006, ENQ MOB QUOT CAT 200, V0, P0
   Banister D, 2006, IET PROCEEDINGS INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, V153, P276, DOI 10.1049/ip-its:20060009
   Banister D, 2008, TRANSPORT POLICY, V15, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Banister D, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P950, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.12.004
   Bissell D, 2013, MOBILITIES-UK, V8, P349, DOI 10.1080/17450101.2012.696343
   Boer R, 2007, AM J PREV MED, V32, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.012
   Boyko CT, 2011, PROG PLANN, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2011.07.001
   Brennan J, 2012, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V70, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.08.006
   Brownstone D, 2009, J URBAN ECON, V65, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.002
   Busquets J, 2004, BARCELONA URBAN CONS, V0, P0
   García-Palomares JC, 2010, J TRANSP GEOGR, V18, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.012
   CERA M, 2003, LAND USE TRANSPORT E, V0, P0
   de Nazelle A, 2010, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V15, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.012
   Delbosc A, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1130, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.04.005
   Dempsey N, 2012, PROG PLANN, V77, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001
   Dempsey N, 2010, BUILT ENVIRONMENT, V0, PP116, DOI 10.2148/BENV.36.1.116
   Dura-Guimera A, 2003, CITIES, V20, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2003.08.004
   Ewing R, 2002, MEASURING SPRAWL ITS, V0, P0
   Ewing R, 2011, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V137, P248, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000068
   Frank L, 1994, TRANSPN RES REC, V1466, P44
   Geurs KT, 2004, J TRANSP GEOGR, V12, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   GIMENEZ-NADAL J, 2011, TIME CRUNCH PARADOX, V0, P0
   Greenwald MJ, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V0, PP33, DOI 10.3141/1780-05
   Hanson S, 2010, GENDER PLACE CULT, V17, P5, DOI 10.1080/09663690903498225
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIES, V0, P0
   Jensen OB, 2009, MOBILITIES-UK, V4, P139, DOI 10.1080/17450100802658002
   Kaido K, 2008, WORLD CITIES URBAN F, V0, P0
   Kockelman KM, 1997, TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, V1607, P117
   Koohsari MJ, 2013, CITIES, V35, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.001
   Litman T, 2009, LAND USE IMPACTS TRA, V0, P0
   Loo BPY, 2006, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V132, P76, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:2(76)
   Martori Canas JC, 2010, SCRIPTA NOVA, VXIV, P0
   Mendez R, 2009, PERSPECTIVA GEOGRAFI, V0, P199
   Miralles-Guasch C, 2008, SOCIAL USE TIME METR, V0, P0
   Miralles-Guasch C, 2011, ANALES GEOGRAFIA U C, V31, P0
   Miralles-Guasch C, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V36, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.009
   Miralles-Guasch C, 2010, TRANSPORT POLICY, V17, P454, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.012
   Muckenberger U, 2008, PAPERS REGIO METROPO, V49, P32
   Muñiz I, 2013, EURE, V39, P189, DOI 10.4067/S0250-71612013000100008
   Newman P, 1989, CITIES AND AUTOMOBILE DEPENDENCE: AN INTERNATIONAL SOURCEBOOK, V0, P0
   Næss P, 2005, PROG PLANN, V63, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2004.08.003
   Nss P, 2013, EUROPEAN PLANNING ST, V0, P1
   OECD, 2012, COMP CIT POL, V0, P0
   Pallares-Barbera Montserrat, 2011, URBANI IZZIV, V22, P122, DOI 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2011-22-02-005
   Peters P, 2010, MOBILITIES-UK, V5, P349, DOI 10.1080/17450101.2010.494840
   Poli C, 2009, CITTA FLESSIBILI RIV, V0, P0
   [Portner H-OIPCC IPCC], 2019, CLIMATE CHANGE 2022-IMPACTS, V0, P0, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844
   Rietveld P, 2000, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V5, P31, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00022-X
   Robert J, 1992, TEMPO RUBATO USO AUT, V0, P0
   Rodrigue Jean-Paul, 2006, GEOGRAPHY TRANSPORT, V3rd, P0
   Ryley TJ, 2008, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V42, P620, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.005
   Scheiner J, 2010, J TRANSP GEOGR, V18, P679, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.002
   Sung HG, 2013, CITIES, V35, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.010
   Timmermans H, 2002, TRANSPORT POLICY, V9, P79, DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00003-3
   *TRANSP RES BOARD, 2005, 282 TRANSP RES BOARD, V0, P0
   TRB, 2009, DRIV BUILT ENV EFF C, V0, P0
   Ureta S, 2008, MOBILITIES-UK, V3, P269, DOI 10.1080/17450100802095338
NR 58
TC 135
Z9 155
U1 0
U2 86
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD FEB 15
PY 2015
VL 42
IS 
BP 258
EP 266
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.012
PG 9
WC Urban Studies
SC Urban Studies
GA AY7QP
UT WOS:000347754500011
DA 2026-05-02
ER

