Lymphoid neoplasms such as multiple myeloma (MM), indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia are increasingly managed as chronic, relapsing conditions characterized by prolonged surveillance, repeated treatment transitions, and cumulative self-management demands. These trajectories expose patients and caregivers to persistent illness uncertainty, fluctuating
[...] Read more.
Lymphoid neoplasms such as multiple myeloma (MM), indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia are increasingly managed as chronic, relapsing conditions characterized by prolonged surveillance, repeated treatment transitions, and cumulative self-management demands. These trajectories expose patients and caregivers to persistent illness uncertainty, fluctuating fear of progression, symptom and comorbidity burden, communication challenges, and treatment-related workload. This theory-informed framework development paper uses an overview of selected psycho-oncological, hematological, nursing, theoretical, and patient-reported outcome literature to propose the LUMINA framework: Longitudinal illness trajectory, Uncertainty fields, Multidimensional symptom and comorbidity load, Information and interaction context, Navigation work and self-management load, and Adaptive outcomes and alignment. LUMINA is intended as a hypothesis-generating conceptual structure to organize clinically relevant domains, clarify potential relationships among uncertainty, symptom burden, communication, navigation work, and adaptive outcomes, and guide future assessment, validation, and intervention research in chronic lymphoid neoplasms. The framework builds on prior theories of illness uncertainty, treatment burden, workload–capacity balance, fear of recurrence/progression, and lymphoma-specific qualitative work on uncertainty management and psychosocial adaptation. Potential research applications include structured assessment, shared decision-making research, and domain-matched supportive-care concepts; however, these applications remain theoretical and require empirical testing. Future studies should evaluate feasibility, acceptability, construct validity, domain overlap, predictive validity beyond quality of life, and the clinical utility of LUMINA-informed research profiles. Until such validation is available, LUMINA should be interpreted as a conceptual model rather than a validated clinical tool or care pathway.
Full article