Airplane Emergency Landing Due to Quick Development of Mesoscale Convective Complexes

: Some meteorological phenomena in South America develop quickly and take on large dimensions. These phenomena cause disasters for aviation, such as incidents and accidents. Mesoscale convective complexes (MCCs) forced a commercial airplane into an emergency landing at Ezeiza International Airport in Buenos Aires (Argentina) in October 2018. The airplane took off from S ã o Paulo (Brazil) to Santiago (Chile) and had to alternate to Ezeiza after encountering unanticipated agglomerations of MCCs along the ﬂight route; its structure was seriously damaged, which affected the safety of the ﬂight. A synoptic and thermodynamic analysis of the atmosphere, prior to the event, was made based on GOES16 infrared satellite data, radiosonde data, maps of several variables such as stream lines, temperature advection, surface synoptic maps and layer thickness from CPTEC/INPE and NCEP reanalysis data. The main observed processes that inﬂuenced the formation and development of conglomerates of MCCs were the following: (1) the cyclogenesis of a baroclinic cyclone on the cold front; (2) the coupling of subtropical and polar jet streams; (3) the advection of warm and humid air along a low-level jet stream. Recommendations for meteorologists in weather forecasting and for aviators in ﬂight safety were prepared.


Introduction
Applied meteorology for the purpose of flight safety is still in its infancy in South America. Most of the information is captured by North American studies and adapted to the region. The low temporal and spatial frequency of surface and upper-air data in South America makes it difficult to use numerical atmosphere models and to provide meteorologists with real-time or updated information, leading to a decrease in flight safety. In addition, numerical models have difficulty in representing the convective processes associated with low-level jets, especially those located in the Planetary Boundary Layer [1]. These jets are of great importance and influence the development of convective clouds and mesoscale convective complexes (MCCs) in Southern Brazil and adjacent regions [2][3][4][5][6]. The term mesoscale convective complexes (MCCs) was given by   [3]. The detailed climatology of MCCs in South America was described by   [4]. The MCC structure, formation processes, and development stages were presented by Fedorova (2008b) [5]. The formation processes and forecasting methods of MCCs in northeastern Brazil were described in detail by Fedorova, Pontes da Silva and Levit (2019) [2][3][4][5][6]. The gradual formation of a cyclonic vorticity center at low and middle levels is likely responsible for the round shape of the MCC and was confirmed by simulations by Rocha (1992) [7] as well as by observational studies such as that of Cotton et al. (1989) [8].
The upper-level jet stream is associated with frontal zones of baroclinic cyclones and cyclogenetic processes [6]. The low-level jet stream transports heat and moisture from low to higher latitudes and has a great influence on frontogenesis and MCC formation, especially at night due to its speed increment [9].
Meteorology 2023, 2 2 According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), meteorology is the fastest growing factor causing undesirable events in aviation: while in the United States in 1967 it was responsible for 40% of events, in 2010, at least 50% of aircraft accidents had it as a major contributing or determining factor. In Brazil, about 21% of air occurrences have meteorology as a contributing factor and an even higher percentage have meteorological phenomena as the main or determinant cause of the occurrences [10]. The incorrect analysis of meteorological phenomena, especially adverse ones, is the most contributing factor to the pilot making an erroneous decision [11].
In the case of commercial aircraft operations by national airlines, the last 10 years have seen a significant frequency and persistence of accidents and incidents where meteorology has been a determining factor [12].
Among them was one that attracted the most attention. This happened in October 2018, involving an Airbus 320 model aircraft that encountered hail on the route between the Guarulhos International Airport in São Paulo, Brazil (SBGR) and Arturo Menizes International Airport in Santiago, Chile (SCEL). The intended flight route and the exact location where the aircraft encountered severe hail are shown in Figure 1. In this case, serious damage to the aircraft structure, including the fuselage, occurred, and due to this, an emergency landing was required (Figure 2a,b). This episode occurred in a region in southern Brazil, which is highly frontogenetic and cyclogenetic, fed by low-level jets from the Amazon region. cially at night due to its speed increment [9].
According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), meteorology is the fastest growing factor causing undesirable events in aviation: while in the United States in 1967 it was responsible for 40% of events, in 2010, at least 50% of aircraft accidents had it as a major contributing or determining factor. In Brazil, about 21% of air occurrences have meteorology as a contributing factor and an even higher percentage have meteorological phenomena as the main or determinant cause of the occurrences [10]. The incorrect analysis of meteorological phenomena, especially adverse ones, is the most contributing factor to the pilot making an erroneous decision [11].
In the case of commercial aircraft operations by national airlines, the last 10 years have seen a significant frequency and persistence of accidents and incidents where meteorology has been a determining factor [12].
Among them was one that attracted the most attention. This happened in October 2018, involving an Airbus 320 model aircraft that encountered hail on the route between the Guarulhos International Airport in São Paulo, Brazil (SBGR) and Arturo Menizes International Airport in Santiago, Chile (SCEL). The intended flight route and the exact location where the aircraft encountered severe hail are shown in Figure 1. In this case, serious damage to the aircraft structure, including the fuselage, occurred, and due to this, an emergency landing was required (Figure 2a,b). This episode occurred in a region in southern Brazil, which is highly frontogenetic and cyclogenetic, fed by low-level jets from the Amazon region.
The aim of this work was to analyze the meteorological conditions that cause the very fast and strong formation and development of adverse meteorological phenomena, including hail, which was responsible for the flight episode on 31th of October 2018. As a result, we prepared recommendations for meteorologists on forecasting these phenomena and recommendations on flight safety for aviators.
The flight episode occurred in the early morning of 31 October 2018 at 06 UTC. In green, the departure airport (Guarulhos International Airport in Brazil-SBGR). In red, the intended destination (Arturo Menizes International Airport in Santiago-SCEL). In black, the flight plan route. In purple, the airport where the emergency landing was performed (Ezeiza International Airport in Argentina-SAEZ). In orange, the approximate position of the hail strike. As a triangle (▲), the airports with weather messages available s METAR, SPECI or radiosonde. Figure 1. Intended flight route. In green, the departure airport (Guarulhos International Airport in Brazil-SBGR). In red, the intended destination (Arturo Menizes International Airport in Santiago-SCEL). In black, the flight plan route. In purple, the airport where the emergency landing was performed (Ezeiza International Airport in Argentina-SAEZ). In orange, the approximate position of the hail strike. As a triangle ( ), the airports with weather messages available s METAR, SPECI or radiosonde.
The aim of this work was to analyze the meteorological conditions that cause the very fast and strong formation and development of adverse meteorological phenomena, including hail, which was responsible for the flight episode on 31th of October 2018. As a result, we prepared recommendations for meteorologists on forecasting these phenomena and recommendations on flight safety for aviators.
The flight episode occurred in the early morning of 31 October 2018 at 06 UTC.

Materials and Methods
The flight episode occurred in the early morning of 31 October 2018, at 06 UTC (Universal Time Coordinated). Detailed synoptic and thermodynamic conditions were Meteorology 2023, 2 3 analyzed 24 h before the aircraft collision with the MCC with heavy hail. Therefore, the analyzed period was from 30 to 31 October until 6 UTC.
The following synoptic and thermodynamic available variables were used:  [15].
The evolution and displacement of meteorological systems that influenced the creation, development and subsequent conglomeration of MCCs over South America, the oceans and adjacent areas were analyzed. The role of baroclinic and barotropic systems, frontal zone displacements, upper-level jet streams and cyclogenetic processes in the formation of MCC conglomeration and its evaluation were studied in detail. The specific topographic conditions of South America, such as the Andes Mountain range, were also analyzed. It plays a fundamental role in the establishment of flow from the north, at low levels, on its eastern slope, in the presence of heat sources in the Amazon, which are typical for summer [16,17].
Seasonal barometric systems such as Bolivian High and South Atlantic Subtropical High were also part of the study.
Meteorological data for international airports located along the intended flight route and adjacent areas to the place where the episode occurred were recorded on the METAR and SPECI database (message to the pilot and special weather report) ( Figure 1). The meteorological data were obtained from databases and websites of official meteorological data-capture agencies such as: Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies of the National Institute for Space Research (CPTEC/INPE), Meteorology Network of the Aeronautics Command (REDEMET), National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) [15][16][17][18].

Materials and Methods
The flight episode occurred in the early morning of 31 October 2018, at 06 UTC (Universal Time Coordinated). Detailed synoptic and thermodynamic conditions were analyzed 24 h before the aircraft collision with the MCC with heavy hail. Therefore, the analyzed period was from 30 to 31 October until 6 UTC.
The following synoptic and thermodynamic available variables were used:  [15]. The evolution and displacement of meteorological systems that influenced the creation, development and subsequent conglomeration of MCCs over South America, the oceans and adjacent areas were analyzed. The role of baroclinic and barotropic systems, frontal zone displacements, upper-level jet streams and cyclogenetic processes in the formation of MCC conglomeration and its evaluation were studied in detail. The specific topographic conditions of South America, such as the Andes Mountain range, were also analyzed. It plays a fundamental role in the establishment of flow from the north, at low levels, on its eastern slope, in the presence of heat sources in the Amazon, which are typical for summer [16,17].
Seasonal barometric systems such as Bolivian High and South Atlantic Subtropical High were also part of the study.
Meteorological data for international airports located along the intended flight route and adjacent areas to the place where the episode occurred were recorded on the METAR and SPECI database (message to the pilot and special weather report) ( Figure 1). The meteorological data were obtained from databases and websites of official meteorological data-capture agencies such as: External view [19].

Results and Discussion
Satellite images ( Figure 3) confirmed that the episode occurred within the large area of cumulonimbus clouds (Cb), which were created by the conglomeration of MCCs. The stages of development of these MCCs and their agglomeration are described below.

Results and Discussion
Satellite images ( Figure 3) confirmed that the episode occurred within the large area of cumulonimbus clouds (Cb), which were created by the conglomeration of MCCs. The stages of development of these MCCs and their agglomeration are described below.

Episode Overview
The stages of evolution, formation and development of the MCCs that affected the flight trajectory in the period of time preceding the impact are as follows (

Episode Overview
The stages of evolution, formation and development of the MCCs that affected the flight trajectory in the period of time preceding the impact are as follows ( The sequence of satellite images (Figure 3) showed the speed of development, size and evolution of the MCCs and their subsequent union. Up to three hours before takeoff (Figure 3c), there was no need for significant meteorological deviations; therefore, little additional fuel was required for the route. At this time, all the flight planning had already been prepared, and all the fuel needed for meteorological deviations was planned.
Two hours after takeoff, the aircraft encountered extremely large and dangerous meteorological formations, covering Uruguay, southern South America, northwest Argentina and Paraguay. Cloud top temperature reached −100 • C. Large lateral deviations should have been made, but the aircraft did not have such a large supply of fuel. It should be noted that the favorable place for the beginning of the MCC was located northwest of the center of maximum speed, at upper levels [20,21], as can be seen from Figures 3d and A2e.
In addition, it should be noted that the meteorological radar used in such an aircraft does not see hail [22]. Cloud tops with a temperature of −100 • C and with hail cannot be detected by radars. Such a convective system showed signs of dissipation only 3 h after the event. According to Machado and Rossow (1993), as this type of convective system reaches its mature phase, a large number of stratus and cirrus clouds form, reaching about 80% of the total area [23]. This maturity could only be seen at 09:00 GMT, as shown in Figure 4. Consequently, at the moment of impact between the aircraft and hail coming from the MCC at 06:00 GMT, this MCC was in full convective activity.
Meteorology 2023, 3, FOR PEER REVIEW clouds, detached from the end of the cold front, formed a well-defined conglomera tion. The temperature of the cloud top quickly dropped and reached −60 °C (high troposphere). It was no longer possible to fly over the tops of MCC formations, and deviations from the flight path due to weather conditions were necessary.
• Time of the event and 2 h after takeoff: cold front moved towards the Atlantic Ocean (Figure 3d). End of the front with clusters of MCCs joined, forming a large conglom eration of MCCs, covering several countries in South America, such as southern Bra zil, Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay. The temperature of the cloud top reached −9 °C to −100 °C. The sequence of satellite images (Figure 3) showed the speed of development, siz and evolution of the MCCs and their subsequent union. Up to three hours before takeof (Figure 3c), there was no need for significant meteorological deviations; therefore, littl additional fuel was required for the route. At this time, all the flight planning had already been prepared, and all the fuel needed for meteorological deviations was planned.
Two hours after takeoff, the aircraft encountered extremely large and dangerous me teorological formations, covering Uruguay, southern South America, northwest Argen tina and Paraguay. Cloud top temperature reached −100 °C. Large lateral deviation should have been made, but the aircraft did not have such a large supply of fuel. It should be noted that the favorable place for the beginning of the MCC was located northwest o the center of maximum speed, at upper levels [20,21], as can be seen from Figures 3d and A2e.
In addition, it should be noted that the meteorological radar used in such an aircraf does not see hail [22]. Cloud tops with a temperature of −100 °C and with hail cannot b detected by radars. Such a convective system showed signs of dissipation only 3 h after the event. Ac cording to Machado and Rossow (1993), as this type of convective system reaches its ma ture phase, a large number of stratus and cirrus clouds form, reaching about 80% of th total area [23]. This maturity could only be seen at 09:00 GMT, as shown in Figure 4. Con sequently, at the moment of impact between the aircraft and hail coming from the MCC at 06:00 GMT, this MCC was in full convective activity.

METAR and SPECI Analysis
METAR and SPECI messages were received from international aerodromes cleared for emergency landings along the intended and ongoing flight route shown in Figure 1. These aerodromes were selected for analysis because they are close to the study area and because they have minimal operational requirements and capabilities to accommodate medium-size aircraft on an international flight. Such aerodromes are indicated by a symbol , in Figure 1. They are: Porto Alegre-RS (SBPA) in Brazil; Ezeiza (SAEZ), Cordoba (SACO) and Resistencia (SARE) in Argentina; Montevideo (SUMU) in Uruguay, and Asuncion (SGAS) in Paraguay. From the weather reports from these airports, shown in Table 1, it was possible to check the current weather 6 and 4 h before the episode. Thus, the following times were analyzed: 00:00 UTC, 03:00 UTC and 06:00 UTC (the exact time of the event). In general, on the surface at most of the airports shown, one can observe a change in the quadrant of the direction of the wind and a decrease in temperature as the cold front passes.
Rain and post-frontal fog were found as typical synoptic characteristics during the passage of a cold front. It should be noted that on the end of the cold front, in the area of the Resistencia Airport, in addition to METAR messages, it became necessary to develop SPECI messages due to sudden changes in the weather. It was exactly in this region, at a cold frontal end, where large thermodynamic and synoptic characteristics were confirmed (Table 2), which favored the formation and development of the MCCs and their subsequent junction. It is around the Resistencia Airport, through the analysis of SPECI reports, that the magnitude of the effects of MCCs, such as heavy rain, thunderstorms, cumulonimbus clouds and gusts of wind, can be observed.

24 h before the Event and 22 h before Taking off
The cold front of a baroclinic cyclone in the south Atlantic (53 °S) was observed at low levels (925 hPa) by the convergence with the air of an anticyclone located near the southeast of Brazil (30 °S) ( Figure A1b in Appendix A). The high values of wind speed (reaching 18 m/s) were recorded along this front. The low-level jets crossing northern Argentina and Paraguay were weak (~13 m/s) and presented convergent flow in these regions. The airflow in this stream was directed towards west central Argentina. This baroclinic cyclone with a frontal zone was located below the leading edge of the trough at 700 hPa ( Figure A1c). The polar and subtropical jet streams at 200 hPa were located in northern and southern Argentina (Figure A1e), respectively. The core of the jet stream was located far from the MCC formation zone. Therefore, 24 h before the event, cyclogenetic factors were absent.

At the Event Time (06h00 UTC)
The cyclogenetic process was observed on the cold front, in the vicinity of Uruguay and Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). This process occurred below the leading edge of the trough at 700 hPa, as was already mentioned in the previous part ( Figure A2c). The speed of the low-level jet streams increased (up to 20 m/s) and their direction changed to the southeast ( Figure A2b); therefore, these jet streams entered the periphery of the cold front. These low-level jets supply hot air to the leading edge of the frontal zone and are one of the main factors of cyclogenesis. This entry of hot air at low levels was responsible for creating a very strong instability. Six hours before the impact, according to the radiosonde data of Porto Alegre Airport-RS, Brazil ( Figure 5), there was a well-defined temperature inversion at low levels (temperature brought by the low-level jets) and soon after that, at 925 hPa, a weak atmospheric instability with an increase in CAPE to 537.4 J/kg. The Lifted

24 h before the Event and 22 h before Taking off
The cold front of a baroclinic cyclone in the south Atlantic (53 • S) was observed at low levels (925 hPa) by the convergence with the air of an anticyclone located near the southeast of Brazil (30 • S) ( Figure A1b in Appendix A). The high values of wind speed (reaching 18 m/s) were recorded along this front. The low-level jets crossing northern Argentina and Paraguay were weak (~13 m/s) and presented convergent flow in these regions. The airflow in this stream was directed towards west central Argentina. This baroclinic cyclone with a frontal zone was located below the leading edge of the trough at 700 hPa ( Figure A1c). The polar and subtropical jet streams at 200 hPa were located in northern and southern Argentina (Figure A1e), respectively. The core of the jet stream was located far from the MCC formation zone. Therefore, 24 h before the event, cyclogenetic factors were absent.

At the Event Time (06h00 UTC)
The cyclogenetic process was observed on the cold front, in the vicinity of Uruguay and Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). This process occurred below the leading edge of the trough at 700 hPa, as was already mentioned in the previous part ( Figure A2c). The speed of the low-level jet streams increased (up to 20 m/s) and their direction changed to the southeast ( Figure A2b); therefore, these jet streams entered the periphery of the cold front. These low-level jets supply hot air to the leading edge of the frontal zone and are one of the main factors of cyclogenesis. This entry of hot air at low levels was responsible for creating a very strong instability. Six hours before the impact, according to the radiosonde data of Porto Alegre Airport-RS, Brazil ( Figure 5), there was a well-defined temperature inversion at low levels (temperature brought by the low-level jets) and soon after that, at 925 hPa, a weak atmospheric instability with an increase in CAPE to 537.4 J/kg. The Lifted Condensation Level (LCL) can be detected close to 800 hPa together with atmospheric humidification (between 750 hPa and 580 hPa). Between 600 hPa and 230 hPa (aircraft flight levels), the atmosphere remained relatively dry. Hail is more likely to be detected in a dry atmosphere, as the moisture in the air acts as a heat conductor, helping to melt the ice [22]. Meteorology 2023, 3, FOR PEER REVIEW Condensation Level (LCL) can be detected close to 800 hPa together with atmospheri humidification (between 750 hPa and 580 hPa). Between 600 hPa and 230 hPa (aircraf flight levels), the atmosphere remained relatively dry. Hail is more likely to be detected in a dry atmosphere, as the moisture in the air acts as a heat conductor, helping to mel the ice [22]. The deepening of the trough at middle levels of 500 hPa ( Figure A2d) and at uppe levels of 200 hPa ( Figure A2e) was accompanied by the union of subtropical and polar je streams. The region of the union of these currents was observed close to the impact region this union occurred due to the strong difluence of winds in the Pacific Ocean, west of th Andes, in the high-pressure zone [24]. The formation of MCC clusters occurred in the en try zone of the jet stream core at upper levels ( Figure A2e). This region is typical for up ward movements and in this case the polar and subtropical jet streams that combined i a single core created the very intense upward movements shown in Figure A1f, with ver strong negative Omega values.

Review of Meteorological Processes That Caused the Air Episode
Summarizing all the characteristics of the troposphere and the meteorological pro cesses that caused the air episode, Table 2 was compiled.
The area of the event has the following favorable climatological characteristics fo MCC development.
• Spring and summer are the most favorable months of the year for MCC developmen • The night period is most favorable for MCC formation. At low levels (925, 850 and 700 hPa): • A baroclinic trough over the Atlantic Ocean joined with the low-pressure center, lo cated east of Uruguay. Therefore, the trough from Chaco Low towards the baroclini cyclone east of Uruguay was extended. There was a confluence and significant in crease in the speed of the low-level jets from the northern region of South America t the area of the frontal extremity (925 and 850 hPa). Such low-level jets bring laten heat and air humidity to the area. Therefore, the next processes at low levels wer observed: The deepening of the trough at middle levels of 500 hPa ( Figure A2d) and at upper levels of 200 hPa ( Figure A2e) was accompanied by the union of subtropical and polar jet streams. The region of the union of these currents was observed close to the impact region; this union occurred due to the strong difluence of winds in the Pacific Ocean, west of the Andes, in the high-pressure zone [24]. The formation of MCC clusters occurred in the entry zone of the jet stream core at upper levels ( Figure A2e). This region is typical for upward movements and in this case the polar and subtropical jet streams that combined in a single core created the very intense upward movements shown in Figure A1f, with very strong negative Omega values.

Review of Meteorological Processes That Caused the Air Episode
Summarizing all the characteristics of the troposphere and the meteorological processes that caused the air episode, Table 2 was compiled.
The area of the event has the following favorable climatological characteristics for MCC development.

•
Spring and summer are the most favorable months of the year for MCC development.

•
The night period is most favorable for MCC formation.
At low levels (925, 850 and 700 hPa): • A baroclinic trough over the Atlantic Ocean joined with the low-pressure center, located east of Uruguay. Therefore, the trough from Chaco Low towards the baroclinic cyclone east of Uruguay was extended. There was a confluence and significant increase in the speed of the low-level jets from the northern region of South America to the area of the frontal extremity (925 and 850 hPa). Such low-level jets bring latent heat and air humidity to the area. Therefore, the next processes at low levels were observed: • Cold front end around the event area; Figure A2a.
• Confluence of the low-level jets, coming from the north of South America to the baroclinic cyclone over the study area; Figure A1b. • Displacement of the barotropic low-pressure center (known as low of the Chaco) to the baroclinic low-pressure center located in the study area. • Union of the trough over the Atlantic Ocean with the baroclinic low-pressure center over the study area; Figure A2b. • High pressure over the Atlantic Ocean that prevented the displacement of the cold front to the northeast, as shown in Figure A2b.
Therefore, mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) with sequential propagation (Figure 3c) occurred under the conditions of strong warm advection at low levels ( Figures A1g and A2g) and strong wet advection in the layer between the surface and 700 hPa. This advection transported heat and moisture from the Amazon region towards southern South America. A pattern affecting low-level flow was a strong anticyclone, located off the coast of Brazil ( Figure A1b,c and Figure A2b,c) which mainly acted in the MCS previous development [25].
At the middle levels (500 hPa): • The MCC formation area was found between the ridge in the vanguard and trough at the rear; this is typical behavior of the middle atmosphere at the beginning of the cyclogenetic process, as shown in Figure A2d [5].

•
Negative Omega values at and around the study area, which means that there were significant convective movements as shown in Figure A2f.

Limitations
There were operational and meteorological limitations for the study of such an event. Among them: • A lack of approved ground-based meteorological radars to provide flight controllers with real-time images to assist pilots in making necessary meteorological deviations en route, as well as during takeoffs and approaches, and to obtain data on cold front displacement in the region. Therefore, the entire interpretation of the atmosphere and the solution of meteorological deviations are left to the discretion of the pilots.

•
There is an under-reporting of such events in the aviation environment. Typically, such events are limited to the airline safety sector and are therefore not reported. Thus, it is impossible to calculate the true number of such events occurring in the region during this period of the year. Additionally, there is no way to access the operational data such as damage, injuries, etc.

•
There is no regulation requiring the presence of meteorologists in airlines. Consequently, scientific and more accurate data cannot be obtained and turned into scientific research. This explains the low level or complete absence of previous studies related to such cases. • MCCs take place predominantly at night, when there are some operational restrictions, among them: • At night, at airports close to the impact area, indicated by the symbol ( ) in Figure 1, as well as at origin (SBGR), destination (SCEL) and alternative (SAEZ) airports, there were no radiosonde data in the morning. Therefore, the actual data of radio sounding were not recorded. Only Porto Alegre RS Airport, Brazil (SBPA) had radiosonde data at 00 GMT on the 31st, i.e., 6 h before the event ( Figure 5). • At night, it is impossible for pilots to visualize convective systems and their dimensions with the naked eye, and, in addition, airborne meteorological radars do not detect ice [22] (the cloud top temperature reached -100 • C, as shown in Figure A1a). Therefore, phenomena such as hail may be invisible to pilots.

Flight Plan Recommendations
In addition to the operational and meteorological limitations shown in 3.5, to minimize negative impacts on air operations at work, proposals for the preparation of a flight plan were created. Some modifications to a flight plan have been proposed that minimize, firstly, human losses, secondly, material losses and thirdly, increase flight safety. The proposals are based on climatological characteristics that have a synoptic and thermodynamic analysis. The proposals are presented in Table 3. Table 3. Operational proposals of minimize the negative MCC impacts on aircrafts.
Development of flight routes that do not cross climatologically potential MCC areas.
If it is impossible to carry out a flight that does not pass through an area with synoptic and cyclogenetic climatological characteristics, in certain seasons and time of the day, then it is proposed to add fuel to the flight, covering at least 480 km of lateral deviations, at flight level intended, since the average radius of MCCs is 240 km (average radius of MCCs in South America) [27].
Implementation of a meteorologist in the airline safety area. This professional will help the flight operational crew to develop a safe flight plan and make the right decisions in developing a flight plan.
Courses, developed by meteorologists, for target audiences such as pilots, flight dispatchers and flight controllers on cyclogenetic processes and MCCs.
Implementation and approval of ground meteorological radars to help lateral and vertical deviations of aircraft that encounter convective systems of this magnitude.
Development of meteorological radars on board the aircraft that are able to predict convective cells, MCCs and ice.

Conclusions and Recommendation
According to previous studies [27], the life cycle of convective systems with a radius of 240 km for the middle latitudes of South America in summer has an average lifetime of 15 h and a maximum development at the beginning of the night. From Figures 3, 4, A1 and A2, it can be concluded that the peak of convection and the subsequent union of the MCCs occurred at dawn, when the aircraft was close to the system at its cruising level.
The aircraft's encounter with agglomerations of MCCs and severe hail forced an intermediate emergency landing of the aircraft with severe structural damage.
The synoptic and thermodynamic analysis concluded that there were cyclogenetic processes allowing the development and further union of the MCCs, creating a significant coverage and intense convective movements.
As a result of this research, a table was prepared with a summary of the meteorological processes observed on the day of the event, throughout the atmosphere, around the area of the aircraft's impact with the strong hail, due to the development and subsequent union of the MCCs. The table will serve meteorologists and the public involved in flight safety.
The table warns that flights that pass through the area under study, with the synoptic characteristics observed and described in Table 2, can follow the recommendations given in Table 3. This facilitates and speeds up the preparation of flight plans, mitigates aeronautical accidents and incidents, and serves as an input for new meteorological research aimed at flight safety. Therefore, if synoptic processes similar to those presented in Table 2