Determination of the Best Digestion and Extraction Methods for the Quantification of Microplastics in Landfill Leachate

Abstract

Microplastics (MP) in landfill leachate represent an analytical challenge due to matrix complexity and the need for methods that remove interferents without degrading polymers. This study evaluated the efficiency of four digestion methods (30% H₂O₂, Fenton, 10% NaOH, and 20% HCl) and three density separation solutions (CaCl₂, NaI, and ZnCl₂) for MP quantification in leachate from the Zinacantepec Sanitary Landfill, Mexico. Samples were spiked with seven polymer types (polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and polyamide (PA)). Results analyzed by ANOVA (p < 0.05) showed that Fenton reagent was the most efficient digestion method, achieving 99% MP recovery, whereas alkaline and acid digestions caused degradation of PET, PS, and PA. Regarding density separation, ZnCl₂ (1.7 g/cm³) achieved recovery exceeding 99% for all polymers. The proposed protocol enables effective isolation and identification of degraded microplastics, contributing to advance the understanding of degradation processes and transformation pathways of MP in complex environmental matrices. The combination of Fenton digestion and ZnCl₂ separation showed the highest overall performance, with an efficiency greater than 96%, supporting its use as a reliable protocol for MP quantification in leachate and contributing to methodological standardization in this field.

1. Introduction

Microplastics (MP) have become pollutants of increasing environmental concern worldwide, due to their persistence, bioaccumulation capacity, and potential impacts on ecosystems and human health [1,2]. Their proliferation has led to their detection in diverse environmental matrices, including bodies of water, soils, sediments, and living organisms. In this context, the leachate generated at final disposal sites (FDS) in municipal solid waste (MSW) and special handling waste (SHW) landfills represent a significant potential source and transport pathway for MP to the environment, acting as a vector that mobilize these particles from FDS to surrounding soils and water bodies. However, the high load of organic and inorganic matter present in the leachates complicates their analysis, since these interferents can mask the particles or make their identification difficult, which requires the optimization of protocols that allow the isolation of MP without altering their physicochemical properties.

Among the most employed methods for the digestion of organic matter are chemical processes, such as acid, alkaline, and oxidative digestions, as well as enzymatic techniques. Recent studies have evaluated the effectiveness of advanced oxidation processes such as Fenton, photo-Fenton, and similar processes in the degradation of common MP such as PE, PP, and PVC [3]. On the other hand, MP extraction typically employs high-density solutions, such as CaCl₂, ZnCl₂, or NaI, to separate MP by flotation from wastewater and sediments. Rani et al. [4] provides a comprehensive guide on methods for extracting MP from complex environmental matrices, highlighting the importance of organic matter removal and density separation. Vázquez-Morillas et al. [5] evaluated five extraction protocols on the fine fraction of urban solid waste, finding that digestion with KOH followed by flotation and centrifugation achieved optimal results.

However, the effectiveness of these methods varies depending on the sample type [6]. Studies such as those by Hurley et al. [7] and Wang et al. [8] emphasize the need to validate these methods in leachates, where the presence of interferents can lead to an underestimation of actual concentrations of MP. Kabir et al. [9] highlights the importance of selecting methods that do not degrade MP in leachates and that maximize the removal of organic interferents to ensure accurate results.

The study of MP in environmental matrices in Mexico is still in its early stages, with research mainly focused on coastal ecosystems and bodies of water, while the analysis of landfill leachate remains an unexplored area of research. Regional studies have documented the presence of MP in beach sediments in Tamaulipas [10,11], in the digestive tract of sea lions in the Gulf of California [12], and in the karst aquifer of Yucatán [13], demonstrating the widespread distribution of these pollutants in diverse ecosystems across the country. A recent analysis by Dueñas-Moreno et al. [14] evaluated the potential ecological risk of MP in different environments in Mexico, underscoring the need for further research to the extent of this pollution nationwide.

The identification of degraded microplastics in complex matrices such as landfill leachate presents additional challenges, since their altered surfaces and chemical modifications can be masked by organic interferents or further degraded by aggressive analytical protocols. The methods validated in this work are especially suitable for the isolation and subsequent identification of degraded microplastics, as they preserve the physicochemical integrity of weathered particles. This enables more accurate assessments of their abundance, transformation state, and potential environmental fate.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of different methods for digesting and extracting MP from leachate, comparing their ability to degrade organic matter without affecting MP and their recovery efficiency. The results presented allow for the identification of the most suitable techniques, contributing to the development of an analytical protocol for quantifying MP in leachate and improving reliability for future research in the field of pollution and health risks.

2. Materials and Methods

Leachate generated at FDS contains a complex mixture of contaminants, including high levels of organic matter, heavy metals, and salts, as well as MP, whose detection and quantification require specific techniques [8,15]. Figure 1 shows the methodological steps followed in this study to evaluate the efficiency of different MP digestion and extraction methods in leachate, comparing their ability to degrade organic matter without damaging the MP.

2.1. Sample Preparation

To triplicate 25 mL samples of leachate obtained from the lagoon of the Zinacantepec Sanitary Landfill, Estado de México, 10 MP of each of the plastic types PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP, PS, and PA (Figure 2) were added. These MP had been previously characterized (number, size, mass, and morphology). The addition of a diverse polymer matrix is crucial, as studies such as that by Enenche et al. [16] have shown that MP recovery can vary significantly depending on the polymer type, its density, and morphology, especially in complex matrices such as sediments or, in this case, leachate. The inclusion of microfibers is particularly relevant, since recent research indicates that fibers are the predominant morphology in landfill leachates [17,18].

2.2. Sample Digestion

Leachate samples containing MP were subjected to four digestion methods for 24 h in an oven at 50 °C to degrade organic matter with the exception of Fenton digestion, which was carried out for only 30 min at 50 °C. (Figure 3): (1) oxidative digestion with 30% H₂O₂, using a 2:1 ratio (v/v) of leachate sample to H₂O₂ (12.5 mL H₂O₂ per 25 mL sample); (2) Fenton reagent (H₂O₂ + FeSO₄) for catalyzed oxidation, using a 5:2 ratio (v/v) of leachate sample to digestion reagents (5 mL H₂O₂ (30%) + 5 mL FeSO₄ (0.05 M) per 25 mL sample), before Fenton digestion, the pH sample was adjusted to ~3 with 0.1 N H₂SO₄ to promote hydroxyl radical formation and avoid iron precipitation in the form of ferric hydroxide; (3) alkaline digestion with 10% NaOH, using a 10:1 ratio (v/v) of leachate sample to NaOH (2.5 mL NaOH per 25 mL sample); and (4) acid digestion with 20% HCl to additionally dissolve inorganic fractions, using a 5:1 ratio (v/v) of leachate sample to HCl (5 mL HCl per 25 mL sample). The conditions for each treatment were selected based on those reported elsewhere [3,4,5,6,8,15]. The efficiency of the four digestion methods was evaluated by measuring the reduction in chemical oxygen demand (COD).

2.3. Filtration and Primary Recovery

After digestion, the samples were filtered through 0.45 μm cellulose nitrate membranes to retain the MP, followed by washing with distilled water (1:1) to remove reagent residues. This step ensured the separation of plastic particles from the digested matrix, and the integrity of the MP was verified by preliminary microscopic observation.

2.4. Density Flotation Extraction

The recovered MP were subjected to density separation using three solutions recommended in previous studies for wastewater and leachates [4,5,6,8,15]: CaCl₂ (1.47 g/cm³), ZnCl₂ (1.70 g/cm³), and NaI (1.60 g/cm³). Figure 4 shows the extraction process using NaI. Each solution was mixed with the sample in a 1:5 ratio, vigorously stirred, and allowed to stand for 1 h to permit differential flotation of the MP.

2.5. Decantation and Final Filtration

The floating phase, enriched with MP, was carefully decanted and filtered through 0.45 μm cellulose nitrate membranes. The filters were washed with 70% ethanol (1:1) to remove residual salts and dried at room temperature under controlled humidity conditions.

2.6. Physicochemical Characterization

The extracted MP were characterized by optical microscopy to determine their number and morphology, complemented by FTIR spectroscopy for chemical identification. The efficiency of each digestion and density solution method was compared in terms of recovery (%) and preservation of MP properties, using polymer standards as controls. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA to assess significant differences between protocols. The main objective was to identify possible alterations in the characteristic bands of each polymer, such as peak shifts, the appearance of new bands (indicative of oxidation or incorporation of functional groups), or a decrease in intensity (suggestive of polymer chain degradation). This would allow for qualitative corroboration of the quantitative recovery results and determine whether the evaluated methods preserve not only the physical integrity but also the original chemical composition of the MP [16,19].

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was employed as a complementary technique to evaluate the chemical integrity of MP after undergoing different digestion and extraction processes. The spectra of seven polymer types (LDPE, HDPE, PET, PP, PS, PVC, and PA) were analyzed in their pristine (untreated) state and after each combination of the four digestion methods (Fenton, H₂O₂, NaOH, and HCl) with the three extraction solutions (ZnCl₂, NaI, and CaCl₂).

Finally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed to qualitatively evaluate the surface morphology and potential structural damage induced in MP by the different digestion treatments. Representative samples of polymers subjected to the different digestion were selected to compare the effect of these methods on the physical integrity of the particles.

3. Results and Discussion

The results are presented and discussed according to the structure of the stages described in the methodology section, comparing the effectiveness of each technique and with the specialized literature.

3.1. Sample Preparation

The sample preparation stage established a baseline to evaluate the recovery efficiency of subsequent processes. A total of 70 particles per sample (10 particles of each of the seven polymer types: PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP, PS, and nylon 6 microfiber) were added to the leachate samples. This initial count served as a reference for calculating the recovery percentages reported below. No polymer damage was observed before the treatments, confirming the validity of the initial conditions.

The physicochemical characteristics of the leachate sample collected from the Zinacantepec Sanitary Landfill are summarized in

Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of the leachate sample.

Parameter	Ambient Conditions Temperature/Relative Humidity (°C/% RH)	Standard or Method	Units	Value
Temperature (in situ)	24.10/31	NMX-AA-007-SCFI-2000	°C	20.10
pH (in situ)	24.10/31	NMX-AA-008-SCFI-2011	-	8.40
Electrical Conductivity (in situ)	24.10/31	NMX-AA-093-SCFI-2000	mS/cm	6.90
TS	22.6/28	NMX-AA-034-SCFI-2001	mg/L	21,600.00
VS	21.9/21	NMX-AA-034-SCFI-2001	mg/L	9033.33
COD	22.6/30	NMX-AA-030-SCFI-2001	mg/L	6300.00
TOC	22.9/26	NMX-AA-187-SCFI-2021	mg/L	1738.33
NH3-N	22.0/24	NMX-AA-026-SCFI-2001	mg/L	229.82
SO42−	21.1/22	NMX-AA-074-SCFI-2014	mg/L	42.91

. These parameters provide a baseline characterization of the matrix used in the digestion and extraction experiments.

3.2. Sample Digestion

The efficiency of the four digestion methods was evaluated based on their ability to reduce interfering organic matter without degrading the polymers. The results are described below:

Oxidative Digestion (30% H₂O₂): This method demonstrated high efficiency in organic matter reduction, obtaining MP recovery of 95.24% in the final residue. This result is consistent with the study by Sun et al. [19], who, in their evaluation of leachate processing methods, found that 30% H₂O₂ offered the best digestion performance, achieving up to 95% MP recovery in the filter, with an MP recovery rate of up to 95.71 ± 0.82%. The action of hydrogen peroxide allowed the oxidation of organic labile matter without causing significant damage to most polymers.

Fenton’s Reagent Digestion (H₂O₂ + FeSO₄): Fenton-catalyzed digestion proved to be the most effective method for organic matter removal, achieving the cleanest filter appearance and the highest proportion of MP (up to 100%) in the final residue. This finding coincides with that reported by Enenche et al. [16], who, in their search for a consensus method for sediments, concluded that Fenton’s reagent is the most recommended method for organic matter removal, with digestion efficiencies ranging from 69% to 99%, significantly surpassing alkaline (NaOH) or acid (HNO₃) methods. The generation of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals in the Fenton reaction allows a more aggressive and complete oxidation of recalcitrant organic compounds [6].

Alkaline Digestion (10% NaOH): This treatment showed moderate efficiency in the removal of organic matter (81.90% MP recovery in the final residue). However, surface deterioration and color changes were observed in susceptible polymers such as PET and PVC. This chemical degradation is a critical limitation [6,8]. Enenche et al. [16] documented that NaOH digestion exhibited low digestion efficiencies (4–45%) compared to Fenton and can compromise the integrity of certain polymers, leading to an underestimation of their concentration or misidentification.

Acid Digestion (20% HCl): Digestion with HCl proved ineffective for organic matter removal (only 67.62% MP recovery in the final residue) and caused the complete degradation of polymers such as PA (nylon 6) and the softening of PET particles. Enenche et al. [16] also reported that digestion with HNO₃ (another strong acid) presented low organic matter removal efficiencies (6–78%) and could damage polymers, confirming that strong acid treatments are not suitable for matrices with common polymer mixtures in leachates.

The efficiency of the four digestion methods was evaluated by measuring the reduction in the initial COD concentration (6300.00 mg/L) to determine their capacity to reduce interfering organic matter.

Table 2. Efficiency of digestion methods.

Digestion Method	Replica	Final COD (mg/L)	Percentage Reduction of COD (%)	Recovered Parts	Percentage of MP Recovered (%)	Average
H2O2 (30%)	R1	1260.00	80.00	67	95.71	95.24 ± 0.82
	R2	1271.00	79.83	66	94.29
	R3	1255.00	80.08	67	95.71
Fenton	R1	252.00	96.00	69	98.57	99.05 ± 0.82
	R2	246.00	96.10	70	100.00
	R3	255.00	95.95	69	98.57
NaOH (10%)	R1	3780.00	40.00	58	82.86	81.90 ± 0.82
	R2	3822.00	39.33	57	81.43
	R3	3750.00	40.48	57	81.43
HCl (20%)	R1	4788.00	24.00	48	68.57	67.62 ± 0.82
	R2	4830.00	23.33	47	67.14
	R3	4725.00	25.00	47	67.14

presents these results, expressed as the percentage of the 10 MP of each polymer type (70 pieces) recovered after digestion, where higher percentages indicated lower polymer degradation, as well as the percentage of COD reduction.

The pH of the landfill leachate samples was measured at the beginning and end of each digestion method using a calibrated pH meter to monitor potential acid or alkaline shifts that could affect the stability of the polymers. The pH values obtained for each digestion are presented in the Supplementary Material.

Statistical analyses confirmed significant differences (p < 0.05) among the four digestion protocols, with the Fenton method being the most efficient for leachate digestion, followed by H₂O₂. These results highlight the importance of selecting a mild yet powerful oxidative method to preserve the integrity of MP and minimize interferences (Figure 5).

3.3. Filtration and Primary Recovery

Post-digestion filtration using 0.45 μm membranes allowed for the recovery of most plastic particles. Preliminary microscopic observation at this stage revealed that samples digested with Fenton and H₂O₂ produced filtrates with easily distinguishable MP particles and fewer adhering organic residues, facilitating subsequent steps. In contrast, the filters from samples digested with NaOH and, especially, with HCl signs of polymer damage (Figure 6) or showed interfering organic matter particles (Figure 7), which could complicate their quantification and identification, as Sun et al. [19] warned, highlighting the importance of reducing the time and difficulty of subsequent qualitative analyses.

When analyzing the samples treated with alkaline digestion, surface degradation was observed in PET, PVC, and PS, and in those treated with acid digestion, significant degradation was observed in PET, PVC, and PS, as well as complete degradation of PA (nylon 6 microfiber).

3.4. Density Flotation Extraction

The efficiency of the three dense solutions was evaluated in combination with each digestion method.

Table 3. Global recovery efficiency.

Digestion Methods	CaCl2 (1.47 g/cm3)	NaI (1.60 g/cm3)	ZnCl2 (1.70 g/cm3)
H2O2 (30%)	78.30 ± 2.10	89.70 ± 1.80	92.40 ± 1.50
Fenton	85.60 ± 1.90	94.80 ± 1.20	96.70 ± 1.10
NaOH (10%)	52.40 ± 3.50	61.20 ± 2.90	63.80 ± 2.70
HCl (20%)	31.50 ± 4.20	38.60 ± 3.80	40.20 ± 3.60

presents the overall recovery results for each digestion-extraction combination. The most relevant findings were as follows:

• CaCl₂ (1.47 g/cm³): It showed high recovery efficiency for low-density polymers (PP, HDPE, LDPE) and for PA (nylon 6 microfiber), but its efficiency decreased slightly for high-density polymers such as PET and PVC. This is because the density of these particles approaches or exceeds that of the solution, preventing complete flotation.
• NaI (1.60 g/cm³): It offered excellent recoveries for all polymers, including PET and PVC, due to its higher density.
• ZnCl₂ (1.7 g/cm³): It was the most effective solution, achieving almost quantitative recovery (>99%) for all polymer types.

Table 4. Compatibility and recovery efficiency by polymer type.

Digestion/Extraction	PET	HDPE	PVC	LDPE	PP	PS	OTHER
H2O2 (30%) + CaCl2	65%	92%	58%	94%	95%	82%	88%
H2O2 (30%) + NaI	88%	96%	85%	97%	98%	91%	94%
H2O2 (30%) + ZnCl2	92%	98%	90%	98%	99%	94%	96%
Fenton + CaCl2	78%	95%	72%	96%	97%	88%	92%
Fenton + NaI	96%	99%	94%	99%	99%	97%	98%
Fenton + ZnCl2	99%	99%	98%	99%	99%	99%	99%
NaOH (10%) + CaCl2	38% *	75%	28% *	78%	80%	42% *	10% **
NaOH (10%) + NaI	45% *	86%	35% *	88%	89%	50% *	12% **
NaOH (10%) + ZnCl2	48% *	88%	38% *	90%	91%	52% *	15% **
HCl (20%) + CaCl2	18% **	68%	12% **	70%	72%	25% **	0% ***
HCl (20%) + NaI	22% **	75%	16% **	77%	78%	28% **	0% ***
HCl (20%) + ZnCl2	24% **	78%	18% **	80%	81%	30% **	0% ***

* = Surface degradation observable by microscopy. ** = Significant degradation with changes in FTIR spectrum. *** = Complete degradation (unidentifiable polymer).

presents detailed recovery results by polymer type for all combinations evaluated, including observations of polymer degradation.

These results are consistent with the findings of Enenche et al. [16], who reported that only NaI (1.6 g/cm³) allowed for the quantitative recovery of all polymer types in their sediment study, while ZnCl₂ and CaCl₂ recovered all polymers except those with very high density (such as PVC and HDPE). Yatim et al. [17] also used ZnCl₂ (1.7 g/cm³) for MP extraction from landfill soils, validating its use for a wide range of polymers. However, the study by Enenche et al. [16] adds a layer of complexity by noting that particle size influences flotation; different size fractions of the same polymer can exhibit different flotation patterns, indicating that density is not the sole determining factor and that optimization should also consider particle size distribution.

Figure 8 shows the comparison between the extraction methods and the recovery of MP using different types of salts for polymer flotation.

Regarding the removal of organic matter, the Fenton method achieved the highest percentage (99%), closely followed by H₂O₂ (95%), while NaOH showed moderate efficiency (82%) and HCl the lowest yield (68%). It is important to note that these removal values are significantly higher than those typically reported for alkaline and acid methods, suggesting that the leachate samples used may have had a predominantly labile organic load or that digestion times were prolonged. Concerning the density extraction solutions, ZnCl₂ (1.70 g/cm³) consistently demonstrated the highest recovery percentages in all digestions: 95% with H₂O₂, 99% with Fenton, 64% with NaOH, and 40% with HCl, followed closely by NaI with values of 90%, 99%, 61%, and 38% respectively. CaCl₂ (1.47 g/cm³) showed the lowest recoveries: 79%, 85%, 53%, and 32%. The optimal combination was clearly Fenton + ZnCl₂ (or Fenton + NaI), which achieved the highest percentage of organic matter removal (97–98%) and the highest recovery of MP (98–99%), validating these protocols as the most suitable methods for quantifying MP in leachates.

3.5. Decantation and Final Filtration

Decantation and final filtration with 0.45 μm cellulose nitrate membranes enabled efficient recovery of the MP-rich floating phase. Washing with 70% ethanol effectively removed residual salts (CaCl₂, ZnCl₂, NaI) without damaging the polymers, as verified by visual inspection and preliminary FTIR analysis. The choice of cellulose nitrate filters was appropriate, as their flat surface facilitates microscopic observation and subsequent spectroscopic analysis; furthermore, the grid pattern on the surface facilitated particle counting.

3.6. Physicochemical Characterization

The FTIR spectra of polymers subjected to oxidative digestions (Fenton and H₂O₂) preserved the characteristic bands very well in all types of MP evaluated, regardless of the extraction solution employed (ZnCl₂, NaI, or CaCl₂). For LDPE and HDPE, the C-H stretching bands at ~2915 and ~2848 cm⁻¹ and the CH₂ deformation bands at ~1465 cm⁻¹ were sharp, with no evidence of carbonyl bands (~1715 cm⁻¹) indicating oxidation. In the case of PET, the characteristic ester group bands (C=O at ~1715 cm⁻¹ and C-O at ~1240 cm⁻¹) remained unchanged, while in PP the CH₃ stretching bands at ~1375 cm⁻¹ were preserved without shifts. This behavior confirms that oxidative methods, particularly Fenton’s reagent (which achieved 99.0% recovery), do not alter the chemical structure of the polymers, thus confirming their use for precise quantitative analysis. This finding is consistent with the findings of Hurley et al. [7], who demonstrated that Fenton digestion does not induce detectable spectral changes.

Alkaline (NaOH) and acidic (HCl) digestions caused significant alterations in the FTIR spectra of the most susceptible polymers, correlating with lower quantitative recoveries (82.0% and 68.0%, respectively). In PET digested with NaOH, a decrease in the intensity of the C=O band (~1715 cm⁻¹) and the appearance of a broad band between 3200 and 3500 cm⁻¹ were observed, which could be attributed to hydroxyl groups (-OH) formed by the alkaline hydrolysis of ester bonds [20]. Furthermore, PVC exposed to HCl showed a weakening of the C-Cl stretching bands (~600–700 cm⁻¹) and the appearance of bands associated with C=C double bonds (~1650 cm⁻¹). The most extreme case was that of PA (nylon 6 microfiber) with HCl, where the spectra showed the almost complete disappearance of the amide I (~1640 cm⁻¹) and amide II (~1540 cm⁻¹) bands. These findings demonstrated that, unlike oxidative methods, aggressive digestions irreversibly compromise the chemical structure of MP, which not only reduce recovery rates but also make it impossible to accurately identify the polymer type in subsequent analyses, reinforcing the recommendation to avoid NaOH and HCl for the analysis of MP in leachates. All spectra obtained in the FTIR analysis can be found in the Supplementary Material.

Optical microscopy and FTIR analysis of extracted MP confirmed the trends observed in previous stages. The combination of digestion with Fenton’s reagent followed by extraction with ZnCl₂ (or NaI as a less toxic but more expensive alternative) proved to be the best option. This combination maximized the recovery of all seven types of MP (overall recovery efficiency > 96% with ZnCl₂) and produced mostly clean particles, with surfaces free of apparent damage and suitable for more precise chemical identification.

The recovery efficiency obtained with this optimized method is comparable to that reported by Dubey & Thalla [21], who, using a Fenton reagent pretreatment followed by a density separation process, achieved MP recovery rates of 94.3% in leachate samples. This validates the reproducibility of the methodological approach. Furthermore, the obtained FTIR spectra showed well-defined characteristic bands, which facilitated the identification of polymers such as PE, PP, PET, and PS, which have been consistently reported as the most abundant in leachates worldwide [18]. Conversely, the use of alkaline or acid digestions, as evaluated in this study and elsewhere [5,16,19], carries a high risk of polymer degradation, especially for the most susceptible polymers, such as PET, PVC, PS, and PA, which would result in a significant underestimation of MP pollution in leachates.

Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the differences in MP surface preservation, confirming the quantitative recovery results and the FTIR analyses presented. These findings demonstrate that the selection of the digestion method not only affects the efficiency of interfering material removal but also the preservation of particles for subsequent identification and quantification.

Micrographs of polymers subjected to oxidative digestion revealed remarkably smooth and homogeneous surfaces, without severe erosion. Both LDPE and HDPE retained their characteristic morphology (Figure 9), with no evidence of cracks, fractures, or plastic deformation, indicating that the hydroxyl radicals generated in the Fenton reaction and peroxidation with H₂O₂ act selectively on the organic matter without compromising the integrity of the polymer chains. In PS digested using the oxidative method, a preserved surface was observed, even retaining the original manufacturing marks (Figure 10a), in contrast to PS recovered with acid digestion, where surface deterioration is observed (Figure 10b).

On the other hand, PET (oxidative digestion) exhibits well-defined edges and a surface texture without signs of hydrolysis or chemical attack (Figure 11a), characteristics that can be observed in this particle (acid digestion), where defibrillation is seen at the edges of the fragment (Figure 11b). These observations are consistent with those reported by Hurley et al. [7], who demonstrated that oxidative methods do not induce detectable morphological modifications in a wide range of polymers.

The obtained results demonstrate the need to adopt standardized protocols for the analysis of MP in leachate, a particularly complex matrix due to its high organic and inorganic matter content. The implementation of non-validated methods, such as alkaline or acid digestions under harsh conditions, can lead to a significant underestimation of actual MP concentrations, compromising the comparability of leachate studies and the accurate assessment of environmental risk, corroborating the findings reported by Sheriff et al. [6] for wastewater.

4. Conclusions

Experimental analysis demonstrated that the Fenton reagent digestion method (H₂O₂ + FeSO₄) was the most efficient for removing organic matter from leachate samples, achieving an MP recovery rate of 99.05% in the final residue. This method significantly outperformed the other treatments evaluated, with statistically validated differences using ANOVA (p < 0.05). Oxidative digestion with 30% H₂O₂ showed acceptable performance (95.24% MP in the residue).

The physicochemical integrity of MP was adequately preserved using oxidative methods (Fenton and H₂O₂). Alkaline digestion caused surface deterioration and discoloration in PET and PVC, while acid digestion caused complete degradation of PA (nylon 6 microfiber) and softening of PET.

In the extraction stage, the ZnCl₂ solution (1.7 g/cm³) demonstrated the highest recovery efficiency, reaching values above 99% for all polymer types evaluated, including high-density polymers such as PET and PVC. The NaI solution (1.6 g/cm³) also showed excellent recoveries (>97%), making it a viable, albeit more expensive, alternative.

The Fenton + ZnCl₂ protocol validated in this study is particularly suitable (efficiency greater than 96%) for the isolation and identification of degraded microplastics, as it preserves the physicochemical integrity of weathered particles. This methodological contribution provides a reliable tool for future research on MP degradation in complex matrices, facilitating the study of their transformation patterns and environmental fate.