Selecting Catalysts for Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass

: The pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass is a promising technology for obtaining renewable chemicals and fuels to replace fossil-based products. However, due to the complexity of the lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose molecules, a large variety of compounds are often formed, making commercial implementation difﬁcult. The use of a catalyst during reactions has been recognized as one of the major improvements in pyrolysis, allowing the production of selected compounds. Moreover, the large number of available catalysts opens up a wide range of possibilities for controlling the reaction network. Zeolites, hierarchical zeolites, alkali and alkaline earth oxides, transition metals and carbonaceous materials, among others, have been investigated in the pyrolysis of a variety of biomasses. In addition, bifunctional catalysts play a role in pyrolysis, as well as the addition of plastics as hydrogen donors. This review aims to present and discuss in detail state-of-the-art catalytic pyrolysis, focusing on the relationships between the properties of the catalysts and the obtained products. A guideline for selecting catalysts for lignocellulosic biomass is also provided.


Introduction
Since the middle of the last century, mankind has faced several challenges related to the use of fossil fuels. The most critical is to decrease global warming and meet the ever urgently increasing need to supply energy and fuels. In addition, oil and natural gas reserves are not equally located around the world, generating many political and economic conflicts. This scenario has forced most developed countries to look for new sources of energy. These new sources should be investigated and used without damaging the environment and should provide energetic independence. Biomass and lignocellulosic residues greatly fit these requirements, being renewable and widely spread worldwide. Moreover, the development of technologies to produce fuels and chemicals from renewable sources can also generate new jobs and open new markets for the agricultural and forestry sectors. This enables sustainable development and the creation of new products from renewable sources [1]. Another important advantage is the removal of solid wastes from the environment. Currently, biomass accounts for over 50% of the total renewable energy produced in the world [2].
Many technologies are available for converting biomass into fuels and chemicals, such as fractionation, densification, liquefaction, supercritical fluid liquefaction, destructive carbonization, pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal liquefaction and hydrothermal upgrading, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, anaerobic digestion, hydrolysis and fermentation [1][2][3][4][5]. Figure 1 shows the most common methods for biomass conversion [3], the main groups being thermochemical conversion, direct combustion, physical extraction, biochemical conversion, electrochemical conversion and indirect liquefaction. Biochemical conversion involves biodiesel conversion, anaerobic digestion and ethanol synthesis, while indirect liquefaction such as fractionation, densification, liquefaction, supercritical fluid liquefaction, destructive carbonization, pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal liquefaction and hydrothermal upgrading, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, anaerobic digestion, hydrolysis and fermentation [1][2][3][4][5]. Figure 1 shows the most common methods for biomass conversion [3], the main groups being thermochemical conversion, direct combustion, physical extraction, biochemical conversion, electrochemical conversion and indirect liquefaction. Biochemical conversion involves biodiesel conversion, anaerobic digestion and ethanol synthesis, while indirect liquefaction includes Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The thermochemical conversion involves direct liquefaction, pyrolysis and gasification. Among these possibilities, the thermochemical routes have been considered the most feasible ones [3]. During the liquefaction process, biomass undergoes a complex sequence of physical structure and chemical changes, forming liquefied products consisting of small molecules. They are unstable and reactive, and can repolymerize into oily compounds with a wide range in terms of molecular weight distribution. Liquefaction can be either directly or indirectly performed. In the first case, fast pyrolysis produces liquid tars and oils and/or condensable organic vapors. In the second, non-condensable, gaseous products of pyrolysis or gasification are converted into liquid products over a catalyst [1,3].
During gasification, fossil or non-fossil fuels (solid, liquid or gaseous) are decomposed into useful gasses and chemicals. The process can be carried out in gaseous medium (air, oxygen, subcritical steam or a mixture of them) or in supercritical water [3]. Currently, synthetic gasses are mostly produced from fossil fuels. The process essentially converts a potential fuel to another one to: (i) increase the heating value of the fuel, removing nitrogen and water; (ii) remove sulfur and nitrogen avoiding pollution; and (iii) decrease the carbon-to-hydrogen (C/H) mass ratio in the fuel [5]. During the liquefaction process, biomass undergoes a complex sequence of physical structure and chemical changes, forming liquefied products consisting of small molecules. They are unstable and reactive, and can repolymerize into oily compounds with a wide range in terms of molecular weight distribution. Liquefaction can be either directly or indirectly performed. In the first case, fast pyrolysis produces liquid tars and oils and/or condensable organic vapors. In the second, non-condensable, gaseous products of pyrolysis or gasification are converted into liquid products over a catalyst [1,3].
During gasification, fossil or non-fossil fuels (solid, liquid or gaseous) are decomposed into useful gasses and chemicals. The process can be carried out in gaseous medium (air, oxygen, subcritical steam or a mixture of them) or in supercritical water [3]. Currently, synthetic gasses are mostly produced from fossil fuels. The process essentially converts a potential fuel to another one to: (i) increase the heating value of the fuel, removing nitrogen and water; (ii) remove sulfur and nitrogen avoiding pollution; and (iii) decrease the carbon-to-hydrogen (C/H) mass ratio in the fuel [5].
On the other hand, pyrolysis is performed in the absence of oxidizing agents or with a limited supply, not allowing biomass gasification to an appreciable extent. Pyrolysis is one of several reactions occurring during gasification [3,5]. In the last few years, pyrolysis has been extensively studied [1][2][3][4][5] and considered as a promising route for producing fuels and chemicals, because of the simplicity, versatility and the possibility of obtaining desirable products in only one step. Pyrolysis has some disadvantages, such as high operational and investment costs. However, it is expected that this drawback can be overcome by the technological development of pyrolysis facilities and the costs of the next generation of power generation equipment. In addition, the use of catalysts can largely improve the low selectivity of this process. Other challenges include finding an economical production for cleaning fuel gasses from biomass pyrolysis [5].
These advantages have motivated many studies to address pyrolysis; lignocellulosic biomass being the most common feed for the process. Biomass is regarded as the non- In a more practical approach, pyrolysis is performed over an appropriated catalyst (direct catalytic pyrolysis) so that the hydrodeoxygenation reaction occurs in situ. Another approach is to carry out catalytic pyrolysis of biomass to produce platform compounds (ketones, furans and others). These compounds react in a further step to produce liquid The main interest in fast pyrolysis is the high oil-like liquid fraction (bio-oil) yield (up to 75%) that can be obtained. This fraction is a complex mixture of more than 300 compounds [9], mainly ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, esters, aliphatic and aromatic alcohols and ethers [10]. The most abundant compounds are acetic acid, 1-hydroxy-2propanone and levoglucosan, coming from cellulose, in addition to several types of phenols, guaiacols, syringols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids and alcohols from lignin [11]. Because of the large amounts of the reactive oxygenated compounds, bio-oil has undesirable properties, preventing its direct use as a fuel and as feedstock for chemicals production. These properties include: (i) high tendency to polymerize; (ii) low combustion heat; (iii) chemical instability; and (iv) high viscosity and corrosivity [12]. It requires further process steps for upgrading bio-oil by removing the oxygenated compounds to obtain high value-added fuels and chemicals. Several upgrading techniques of bio-oil have been proposed via many methods involving catalysts. They include low temperature esterification with alcohols, catalytic cracking and hydrotreating processes, in addition to hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) [1,2,11].
In a more practical approach, pyrolysis is performed over an appropriated catalyst (direct catalytic pyrolysis) so that the hydrodeoxygenation reaction occurs in situ. Another approach is to carry out catalytic pyrolysis of biomass to produce platform compounds (ketones, furans and others). These compounds react in a further step to produce liquid fuels and high value-added chemicals, such as gasoline and aviation kerosene [13]. Recently, dielectric heating from microwave radiation has also been used for biomass pyrolysis. This process has demonstrated the advantages of providing uniform volumetric heating, energy savings and efficiency, as well as process control flexibility [14].
The composition and distribution of the products of pyrolysis largely depend on temperature, heating rate and residence time. In addition, they are also affected by the kind of atmosphere, biomass and reactor. This requires the optimization of the process conditions for each kind of biomass or each reactor. For instance, Carlson et al. [15], studied the conversion of pine and concluded that the optimized process conditions were 873 K, with a mass space velocity of 0.3 h −1 and a catalyst/pine (weight) = 6 to obtain 15.1% of aromatics and 7.8% of olefins.

Reaction Pathway during Biomass Pyrolysis
Because of the complex structure of biomass, pyrolysis involves multiple stages of decomposition and multiple reactions, which take place at spatial and temporal scales. After heat transfer begins in the vertical direction of the cell cavity of biomass, free moisture evaporates, followed by primary decomposition and secondary reactions, like oil cracking and re-polymerization [16,17]. In the first step (primary decomposition), cellulose undergoes decomposition in a range of 473 to 673 K, producing char. Meanwhile, hemicellulose begins to decompose at 523 up 623 K to produce xylan. From 598 to 673 K, cellulose (also side reactions) produces levoglucosan and furan [18], which decompose into light oxygenates and furanic species at higher temperatures. Lignin undergoes decomposition at a wider range of temperatures (433 to 1173 K), with monolignols being produced at lower temperatures, and phenols and light oxygenates at higher temperatures. Other secondary reactions also take place in the solid biomass with increasing temperatures [19]. As cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin are constituents of biomass, their decomposition simultaneously occurs in certain ranges of temperature.
The main reactions of pyrolysis include deoxygenation, aromatization, ketylation, alcohol aldehyde condensation and catalytic cracking [20]. They selectively occur, depending on the catalyst and on the process variables, so that the lignocellulose structure can produce high quality bio-oil or chemicals. Aromatics production from a lignocellulosic biomass over a zeolite catalyst, for instance, is shown in Figure 3. As we can see, pyrolysis involves a complex network of reactions, coming from the decomposition of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Most steps involve oxygen removal, producing water (by dehydration), carbon monoxide (by decarbonlylation) and carbon dioxide (by decarboxylation), illustrating the role of the catalysts in promoting these reactions. The main initial products are anhydrosugars and furan compounds, from cellulose and hemicellulose decomposition on the acid sites of catalysts by the dehydration of cellulose. It is followed by the production of furanic species (furan, methylfuran, furfural), small aldehydes and water through dehydration, bond cleavage and bond rearrangement in the gas phase. In the next step, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide are produced by oligomerization, decarboxylation, decarbonylation and dehydration reactions of furan compounds over the zeolite catalyst [21]. Furthermore, aromatic molecules of lignin undergo depolymerization, producing olefins over the catalyst. The phenolic compounds undergo cracking and H-transfer reactions on the acid sites of zeolite, leading to benzene, toluene and xylene [22]. Polymerization and isomerization can also occur during pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass [23].
ing on the catalyst and on the process variables, so that the lignocellulose structure can produce high quality bio-oil or chemicals. Aromatics production from a lignocellulosic biomass over a zeolite catalyst, for instance, is shown in Figure 3. As we can see, pyrolysis involves a complex network of reactions, coming from the decomposition of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Most steps involve oxygen removal, producing water (by dehydration), carbon monoxide (by decarbonlylation) and carbon dioxide (by decarboxylation), illustrating the role of the catalysts in promoting these reactions. The main initial products are anhydrosugars and furan compounds, from cellulose and hemicellulose decomposition on the acid sites of catalysts by the dehydration of cellulose. It is followed by the production of furanic species (furan, methylfuran, furfural), small aldehydes and water through dehydration, bond cleavage and bond rearrangement in the gas phase. In the next step, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide are produced by oligomerization, decarboxylation, decarbonylation and dehydration reactions of furan compounds over the zeolite catalyst [21]. Furthermore, aromatic molecules of lignin undergo depolymerization, producing olefins over the catalyst. The phenolic compounds undergo cracking and Htransfer reactions on the acid sites of zeolite, leading to benzene, toluene and xylene [22]. Polymerization and isomerization can also occur during pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass [23].

Catalytic Pyrolysis of Biomass
Catalytic pyrolysis can be performed by two experimental arrangements, so-called in situ and ex situ pyrolysis, as illustrated in Figure 4. In the first case, the feedstock and catalyst are previously mixed and then introduced into the reactor, where the upgrading of solid and vapor phases simultaneously occurs [24]. In this arrangement, biomass and catalyst particles come into contact in the fluidized bed, favoring biomass decomposition. In addition, the large molecules produced by the primary decomposition of biomass will contact the catalyst more easily and then will react faster [13,16]. The vapors diffuse into catalyst pores, where they undergo cracking and other reactions [23]. This increases the pyrolysis degree and decreases the probability of the further reaction of pyrolysis products [13]. This configuration has some drawbacks, such as the pyrolysis temperature, which cannot be optimized for catalyst activation, and the possibility of some vapors not entering into the catalyst pores before attaining the reaction temperature [25]. In addition, high coke can be produced on the catalyst, decreasing both bio-oil yields and quality [26].  As expected, the catalysts decrease the activation energy, and then, the pyrolysis temperature, providing more favorable energetic reaction pathways [35]. This reduces equipment and energy costs and increases biomass conversion, in addition to the possibility of tailoring the distribution of products by different catalysts [23]. Therefore, in situ catalytic pyrolysis is the simplest and most economical route for performing biomass pyrolysis.

Properties of the Catalysts for Biomass Pyrolysis
Because biomass has a complex chemical structure with varied components in multiple forms, in addition to the process variables of pyrolysis, numerous catalysts and additives are required to achieve the desired upgrading of bio-oil and chemical production.
Since biomass pyrolysis involves multiple reaction pathways, different catalysts will change the activation energy and the rate of each reaction in different ways. Different catalytic reactions occur on the metal and/or on acidic/basic sites by redox or H-transfer For both cases, the reusability of the catalysts has been scarcely investigated. Some studies have been recently reported [27][28][29] concerning the reusability of catalysts for ex situ pyrolysis. However, the reusability of catalysts used in in situ configurations has an additional difficulty related to the recovery of the catalysts from char. A possibility for overcoming this drawback is the use of magnetic particles as catalysts.
In ex situ pyrolysis, the feedstock is introduced into the reactor and biomass is cracked to produce pyrolytic vapors which pass over a catalytic bed, where the upgrading is carried out, forming bio-oil, gaseous products and solid by-products. This process has the advantage of cracking and pyrolysis temperatures that can be independently adjusted to optimize maximum catalytic activity under optimum conditions [30]. Furthermore, the char produced can be used to produce heat energy, but longer vapor residence leads to further secondary reactions, producing water and coke. However, the requirement of an additional catalytic reactor is a cost-related limitation. Compared to the in situ process, it leads to higher selectivity for aromatics and syngas [16].
For both cases, the amount and distribution of the products depend on the catalyst type and the catalyst-to-biomass ratio, in addition to the process variables such as temperature, reactor type, biomass particle size, heating rate and residence time [24]. Regardless of the mode of operation, the amounts of catalyst and biomass are fed into the reactor according to the chosen value of the catalyst-to-biomass ratio. For continuous operations, the biomass and catalysts are continuously fed into the reactor, maintaining the chosen value of the catalyst-to-biomass ratio.
In addition to the significant improvement in quality and yield of bio-oil and the increase of different aromatic hydrocarbons [16], the catalyst increases the yields of five main petrochemical products: toluene, benzene, ethylene, propylene and xylene [24]. To maximize aromatic yields, proper catalysts (considering pore structure and active sites) should be used [31]. In addition, high catalyst/biomass and heating rates are needed to guarantee the diffusion of volatile organic compounds into the catalyst pore prior to decomposition into coke [32]. The bio-oil produced by catalytic pyrolysis is deeply deoxygenated, resulting in a high hydrogen-to-carbon (H/C) ratio [33]. The lower amount of oxygen minimizes the number of acidic components and decreases the corrosive nature of the bio-oil [32]. Furthermore, the production of char can be decreased by the catalyst, increasing bio-oil stability [23,34].
All the desired products can be tailored by the appropriate selection of the catalyst. In addition, the operation can be performed in one step and at short residence times (less than 10 s), minimizing secondary reactions. Other advantages of pyrolysis include: the use of an inert atmosphere (avoiding high-pressure hydrogen); no need of using water; the need for only simple pretreatment processes for the feedstock (grinding and drying) and the possibility of using inexpensive catalysts, such as alumina and silica [23].
As expected, the catalysts decrease the activation energy, and then, the pyrolysis temperature, providing more favorable energetic reaction pathways [35]. This reduces equipment and energy costs and increases biomass conversion, in addition to the possibility of tailoring the distribution of products by different catalysts [23]. Therefore, in situ catalytic pyrolysis is the simplest and most economical route for performing biomass pyrolysis.

Properties of the Catalysts for Biomass Pyrolysis
Because biomass has a complex chemical structure with varied components in multiple forms, in addition to the process variables of pyrolysis, numerous catalysts and additives are required to achieve the desired upgrading of bio-oil and chemical production.
Since biomass pyrolysis involves multiple reaction pathways, different catalysts will change the activation energy and the rate of each reaction in different ways. Different catalytic reactions occur on the metal and/or on acidic/basic sites by redox or H-transfer mechanisms, respectively. Some reactions require the cooperation of metallic and acidic sites, generating bifunctional catalysts. They include ring-opening in double or more rings in two stages. Firstly, aromatic rings are hydrogenated on the metal and then form tetralin and derivatives which continue cracking to produce monoaromatics over the acidic sites [36]. Other reactions require both acidic and basic sites, which cooperatively act [37]. It has been found, for instance, that the dehydration, depolymerization, C-C or C-O cleavage and ring-opening reactions are favored by high acidity/basicity ratio [38].
Therefore, the catalysts can be designed to focus the desired products, based on their diverse properties, such as strength and the distribution of Brønsted and Lewis acid (or basic) sites, porosity and following the addition of a metal. Moreover, the pore size and distribution, specific surface area, and the phases and structure of the catalysts should also be considered in its design. These properties can impact the activity and selectivity and, subsequently, the yield of desired products.
In addition to the properties of the catalysts, the pyrolysis feedstock can widely vary, requiring catalysts with different functionalities, which should be designed for each kind of biomass, focusing on the desired products. Furthermore, like most industrial catalysts, the solids for catalyzing biomass pyrolysis for commercial purposes should show high resistance against deactivation and have recycling ability and low costs, in addition to high activity and selectivity [39].

Specific Surface Area and Porosity
This property is one of the most fundamental of solid catalysts for their use in heterogeneous reactions, in both liquid and gas phases. It is believed that a high specific surface area will provide efficient contact between the reactant molecules and the active sites. In addition, the high specific surface area of the support will favor the high dispersion of metal, forming small and highly active particles. Therefore, high specific surface areas are required for almost all heterogeneous reactions, including pyrolysis.

Oxides and Other Microporous Solids
For metallic oxides, such as iron oxide, aluminum oxide, magnesium oxide and zirconium oxide, among others, their specific surface areas are in a range of 20-200 m 2 g −1 [40][41][42]. These solids are typically macroporous, and these values are basically related to particle sizes. Over them, the catalytic reactions, including pyrolysis, will occur on the external surface, since they have no pores. Therefore, high surface areas are always required so that voluminous molecules can achieve active sites, without steric hindrance, due to the large amounts of these molecules on the surface [43,44].

Zeolites and Mesoporous Materials
The disadvantage of steric hindrance, due to the large amounts of voluminous molecules on the external surface, can be overcome by performing pyrolysis over highly porous materials, such as zeolites (microporous) and mesoporous materials. In these cases, the porous structure is quite important, since the pore dimensions, instead of the size of particles, determine the specific surface area. For these materials, the specific surface areas can achieve 1000-2000 m 2 g −1 thanks to micropores and mesopores [45,46]. However, most of the active sites are located inside the pores, requiring the diffusion of reactant molecules to the pores. This access will be determined by the pore sizes, which regulate the entrance of reactant molecules into the pores and then to the active sites. Such a situation has been noted by several authors using HZSM-5 (Zeolite Socony Mobil-five) and other zeolites. Stefanidis et al. [43], for instance, studied the effect of ZSM-5 catalysts on upgrading biomass vapors and found that increasing the specific surface area of the catalyst increased the quality of bio-oil, this being accompanied by a low number of undesirable by-products.
For aromatic fraction in bio-oil, the pore size of zeolites determines the bio-oil production. It has been noted [47] that micropores limit the diffusion of the reactant molecules into the active sites, producing a mixture of oxygenates, coke and syngas, instead of aromatics. Furthermore, a fast deactivation by pore blockages on the zeolite surface was observed. On the other hand, zeolites with large pores, such as beta zeolite (~6 ×~7 Å), produce more polyaromatics hydrocarbon (PAH) than monoaromatics hydrocarbon (MAH) in the pores. This is related to the space inside the large pores, being big enough to allow the diffusion of primary products and to favor the formation of PAH molecules. However, PAH are undesirable compounds as they act as coke precursors [48]. Lin et al. [49] compared four zeolites with different pore sizes (HZSM-5, HBeta, HY and HUSY), and highlighted that a zeolite with a medium pore size can modulate the aromatic production by shape selectivity, resulting in high yields of aromatics and hindering coke formation. On studying the catalytic fast pyrolysis of kraft lignin over conventional, mesoporous and nanosized ZSM-5, Lazaridis et al. [50] found that, over HY and HBeta (larger pore size), PAHs (tri-, tetra-, methylbenzenes and methylnaphthalenes) were the main products. On the other hand, over HZSM-5 (smaller pore size), MAH (toluene and naphthalene) were preferentially produced. In addition, the nano-sized and mesoporous ZSM-5 (prepared by treating ZSM-5 with a mild alkaline solution) were highly selective in the production of (alkyl)phenols. On the other hand, the nano-sized ZSM-5 zeolite produced the lowest amount of bio-oil and the highest production of water, coke and non-condensable gasses, compared to the conventional microporous and mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite. These differences were most related to pore size rather than to the acidity of zeolites.
Zeolites can be classified into three main groups, considering the pore system. The first class includes those with small pores, formed by 8-membered oxygen rings (3 to 4.5 Å) and interlinked supercages (large cavities formed at the intersection of multiple channels). They hinder coke formation and catalyst deactivation. Zeolite A and ZSM-34 (Zeolite Socony Mobil-thirty-four) are included in this group, as shown in Figure 5. The second class has medium pores formed by 10-membered oxygen rings (4.5 to 6 Å), such as ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 (Zeolite Socony Mobil-eleven). The third class has dual pore systems with 8-and 10-membered oxygen ring openings or 8-and 12-membered oxygen ring openings (6 to 8 Å), such as mordenite (MOR), X zeolite, Y zeolite, beta zeolite and stilbite [51]. and highlighted that a zeolite with a medium pore size can modulate the aromatic production by shape selectivity, resulting in high yields of aromatics and hindering coke formation. On studying the catalytic fast pyrolysis of kraft lignin over conventional, mesoporous and nanosized ZSM-5, Lazaridis et al. [50] found that, over HY and HBeta (larger pore size), PAHs (tri-, tetra-, methylbenzenes and methylnaphthalenes) were the main products. On the other hand, over HZSM-5 (smaller pore size), MAH (toluene and naphthalene) were preferentially produced. In addition, the nano-sized and mesoporous ZSM-5 (prepared by treating ZSM-5 with a mild alkaline solution) were highly selective in the production of (alkyl)phenols. On the other hand, the nano-sized ZSM-5 zeolite produced the lowest amount of bio-oil and the highest production of water, coke and non-condensable gasses, compared to the conventional microporous and mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite. These differences were most related to pore size rather than to the acidity of zeolites.
Zeolites can be classified into three main groups, considering the pore system. The first class includes those with small pores, formed by 8-membered oxygen rings (3 to 4.5 Å ) and interlinked supercages (large cavities formed at the intersection of multiple channels). They hinder coke formation and catalyst deactivation. Zeolite A and ZSM-34 (Zeolite Socony Mobil-thirty-four) are included in this group, as shown in Figure 5. The second class has medium pores formed by 10-membered oxygen rings (4.5 to 6 Å ), such as ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 (Zeolite Socony Mobil-eleven). The third class has dual pore systems with 8-and 10-membered oxygen ring openings or 8-and 12-membered oxygen ring openings (6 to 8 Å ), such as mordenite (MOR), X zeolite, Y zeolite, beta zeolite and stilbite [51].  Therefore, shape selectivity (an intrinsic property generated by zeolitic structure) can be used to tailor the desired product, since the oxygenated lignin derivatives are bulky molecules. Yu et al. [52] compared the x, y and z dimensions of the pore openings of ZSM-5, mordenite, beta and Y zeolites in the protonic forms, to evaluate which oxygenated molecules derived from lignin could access the inner surface of them. They observed that the z-dimension of all lignin-derived oxygenates were smaller than the diameter (conjugated) of the zeolite pores (except for the pore with eight rings of mordenite). This indicated the dependence on the y-dimension associated with the diameter (transversal) of the pore openings of zeolites. All lignin-derived oxygenates (except furfural and phenol) could not enter the pores of ZSM-5 and mordenite. Furthermore, a comparatively small fraction of these oxygenates could enter the pores of beta and Y zeolites. These results indicate that most oxygenates can only be converted at the external surface, where catalysts contain only a small fraction of sites [52].
To overcome this limitation, hierarchical zeolites have emerged as promising alternatives for biomass pyrolysis, by combining catalytic activity with an accessible pore structure, as shown by several authors. Kim et al. [53], for instance, investigated the pyrolysis of woody polymer composites over hierarchical ZSM-5 and beta zeolite ( Figure 5). A substantial increase in aromatics production was noted, as compared to non-catalytic pyrolysis. Over zeolites, wood was initially decomposed into oxygenates, which then diffused into the pores, where they reacted through dehydration, dealkylation, dealkoxylation, decarbonylation and decarboxylation reactions over acidic sites inside the pores. Light hydrocarbons, furans, ketones and phenols were obtained as final products. Acidic beta zeolite led to the highest conversion of bulky molecules in the products, in addition to producing the lowest number of aromatics. Furthermore, it produced a higher relative quantity of linear and branched hydrocarbons than the other catalysts, suggesting higher cracking activity, more efficient mass transfer and a higher number of acid sites than ZSM-5. As compared to beta zeolite, the acidic form produced higher amounts of aromatic hydrocarbons due to its higher mesoporosity and acidity [53]. The combination of micro-and mesoporosity reduced the tendency to sinter and to produce large metallic nanoparticles [54]. Qian et al. [55] compared the production of aromatic hydrocarbons over mesoporous ZSM-5 modified with nanocellulose to conventional and alkali-treated mesoporous ZSM-5. The hierarchical ZSM-5 showed higher selectivity to MAH and a decrease in coke accumulation. They noted an increase in the specific surface area of modified mesoporous ZSM-5 (118.8 m 2 g −1 ) in comparison to a conventional ZSM-5 (75.0 m 2 g −1 ) one. This caused an increase in deoxygenation, and then, of MAH and bio-oil. Therefore, the overall efficiency of aromatic hydrocarbon formation from biomass via catalytic pyrolysis can be controlled by the rate of mass transfer to the active sites of the catalyst through shape selectivity [53].
Mesoporous materials have also been used for biomass pyrolysis, mainly because of their high porosity and specific surface areas. Casoni et al. [56], for instance, studied the pyrolysis of cellulose over MCM-41, Al-MCM-41, Fe-MCM-41, Al-Fe-MCM-41 and Cu-MCM-41, noting an increase in liquid products. This was related to the acidity of the catalysts, which promoted dehydration reactions, lowering the levoglucosan production, while increasing the other anhydrosugars.

Carbonaceous Materials
Carbon is one of the most abundant elements on Earth's surface and can be found in assorted forms. Charcoal, biochar and activated carbon are amorphous carbons. Charcoal produced by the thermochemical chemical conversion of feedstock can be modified by activation processes to yield activated carbon. Sourcing the organic feedstock from sustainable and renewable origins produces biochar, eco-friendly charcoal used as a starting material for activated carbon. These solids are typically microporous, but some mesoporous carbons can also be found [57]. The morphology and physical-chemical properties of obtained carbonaceous materials significantly vary. However, these properties can be modified by assorted chemical activation processes [58][59][60]. Understanding the impact of the different properties of the catalysts prepared with these new carbonaceous materials on the catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass is vital to designing new catalysts for targeted results.
The morphology and pore system of the catalysts are important factors for catalyst activity [61][62][63][64][65]. Figure 6 shows different pore structures of carbonaceous solids and some surface functional groups [66]. Because of their high specific surface area and pore volume, they are expected to exhibit high catalytic activity thanks to the augmented amount of available active sites on the surface and in the pores [61,63,65]. In addition, the porous structures allow for the diffusion and further upgrading of pyrolytic vapors into the pores [66]. Hence, a catalyst with a high specific surface area and high porosity will favor the cracking of pyrolytic intermediates and the formation of gaseous products [61]. surface functional groups [66]. Because of their high specific surface area and pore volume, they are expected to exhibit high catalytic activity thanks to the augmented amount of available active sites on the surface and in the pores [61,63,65]. In addition, the porous structures allow for the diffusion and further upgrading of pyrolytic vapors into the pores [66]. Hence, a catalyst with a high specific surface area and high porosity will favor the cracking of pyrolytic intermediates and the formation of gaseous products [61]. These materials have been extensively studied for biomass pyrolysis in recent times, because of the need for economical and greener processes for cellulose conversion. Carbonaceous materials are stable in different media and can be used in pre-treatments, reactions and other operations performed in water, organic solvents or ionic liquids [51,67]. For some applications, they are prepared by an incomplete carbonization of biomass to obtain amorphous carbons [60], followed by sulfonation using concentrated sulfuric acid and chlorosulfonic acid [51,68]. The sulfonation leads to the production of phenolic hydroxyl (-OH), carboxylic (-COOH) (Figure 6), and sulfonic (SO3H) groups; the former two groups having ability to adsorb cellulose by van der Waals forces, and to break the intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonds of cellulose [51,69]. These groups also act as hydrolyzing agents, resulting in high activity [51]. Table 1 presents some examples of activated carbon-catalytic pyrolysis studies performed in the last decade.  These materials have been extensively studied for biomass pyrolysis in recent times, because of the need for economical and greener processes for cellulose conversion. Carbonaceous materials are stable in different media and can be used in pre-treatments, reactions and other operations performed in water, organic solvents or ionic liquids [51,67]. For some applications, they are prepared by an incomplete carbonization of biomass to obtain amorphous carbons [60], followed by sulfonation using concentrated sulfuric acid and chlorosulfonic acid [51,68]. The sulfonation leads to the production of phenolic hydroxyl (-OH), carboxylic (-COOH) (Figure 6), and sulfonic (SO 3 H) groups; the former two groups having ability to adsorb cellulose by van der Waals forces, and to break the intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonds of cellulose [51,69]. These groups also act as hydrolyzing agents, resulting in high activity [51]. Table 1 presents some examples of activated carbon-catalytic pyrolysis studies performed in the last decade.

Acidic and Basic Sites
Because the acidic or basic sites are essential for the suitable catalytic performance in biomass pyrolysis, the catalysts are often classified into acidic (zeolites, metal oxides and acidic carbons) and basic (alkali metal oxides, alkaline earth metal oxides, salt metals and basic carbons) catalysts [51]. However, this classification is not rigid, as several compounds can act both as acids and as bases. (x + y) = total number of tetrahedra per unit cell and w = number of water molecules [78]. The structures of zeolites can vary, as illustrated in Figure 5, and their connectivity can also vary due to the cages within the channel, in addition to the possible formation of one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional channels [79]. Due to their great versatility, zeolites are used in many relevant industrial processes, such as adsorption [80], separation [81] and catalysis [82][83][84].
The catalytic applications of zeolites are largely related to the intrinsic acidity of Brønsted and Lewis, originating from their peculiar structure. The acidity in zeolite comes from the introduction of trivalent aluminum ions into the structure, generating delocalized charges throughout the material, as shown on the right of Figure 7. This charge is counterbalanced by cationic species, leading to the creation of Brønsted acid sites, shown on the left of Figure 6. These sites are catalytically active and donate an acidic proton to pyrolytic substrates (oxygenate and hydrocarbon), leading to carbocation intermediates which are converted to olefins through the β-scission process [79]. Brønsted acidity is usually the most important in the fine chemical industry and in oil refining [82][83][84]. The isomorphic substitution of silicon for aluminum in the tetrahedron gives the aluminosilicates Lewis acidity (or non-protonic acidity) [85]. These properties make zeolites suitable materials for catalyzing biomass pyrolysis, the main motivation being the acidic nature which facilitates the breaking of the C-C and C-O bonds. However, polymerization can also occur [86], leading to coke formation, and thus, to catalyst deactivation.

Acidic and Basic Zeolites
Zeolites are important microporous crystalline materials formed by the linkage of TO4 tetrahedra (T = Si or Al) in different ways, resulting in 253 types of framework topologies. The empirical composition of zeolites can be represented by the formula: M n /x[(AlO2)x(SiO)y]·wH2O, where M = exchangeable cation; n = valence of the cation; (x + y) = total number of tetrahedra per unit cell and w = number of water molecules [78]. The structures of zeolites can vary, as illustrated in Figure 5, and their connectivity can also vary due to the cages within the channel, in addition to the possible formation of onedimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional channels [79]. Due to their great versatility, zeolites are used in many relevant industrial processes, such as adsorption [80], separation [81] and catalysis [82][83][84].
The catalytic applications of zeolites are largely related to the intrinsic acidity of Brønsted and Lewis, originating from their peculiar structure. The acidity in zeolite comes from the introduction of trivalent aluminum ions into the structure, generating delocalized charges throughout the material, as shown on the right of Figure 7. This charge is counterbalanced by cationic species, leading to the creation of Brønsted acid sites, shown on the left of Figure 6. These sites are catalytically active and donate an acidic proton to pyrolytic substrates (oxygenate and hydrocarbon), leading to carbocation intermediates which are converted to olefins through the β-scission process [79]. Brønsted acidity is usually the most important in the fine chemical industry and in oil refining [82][83][84]. The isomorphic substitution of silicon for aluminum in the tetrahedron gives the aluminosilicates Lewis acidity (or non-protonic acidity) [85]. These properties make zeolites suitable materials for catalyzing biomass pyrolysis, the main motivation being the acidic nature which facilitates the breaking of the C-C and C-O bonds. However, polymerization can also occur [86], leading to coke formation, and thus, to catalyst deactivation.  Several zeolites (HZSM-5, Y zeolite, MCM-41, SBA-15, beta zeolite and others) have been used in pyrolysis of biomass to obtain chemicals or fuels [13,[87][88][89]. High value-added species such as furans and aromatics were produced, promoted by the acid sites which act on the decomposition of phenolics. In addition, Mayer et al. [90] noted that the pyrolysis of MDF (medium density fiber) residues over HZSM-5 resulted in the production of 37.91% of monoaromatics, such as BTX (benzene, toluene and xylenes) and others, compared to the non-detectable amount without any catalyst under the same conditions. This behavior was associated with the ability of acidic sites in HZSM-5 to promote deoxygenation reactions, removing oxygen [90]. Different results were obtained by Jin et al. [91] during lignin pyrolysis, where about 75 wt% of phenolics, and less than 5 wt% of aromatic hydrocarbons were detected. However, over HZSM-5, several upgrading reactions occurred, such as deoxidation and polymerization, resulting in a higher proportion of monoaromatic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons [91]. Therefore, the high acidity of the catalysts favored deoxidation reactions, decreasing the amount of phenolics and increasing the number of hydrocarbons. These studies have shown the potential of HZSM-5 for biomass pyrolysis.
In addition to its activity in deoxygenation reactions, it has hydrothermal stability, acid strength and density [92].
Beta zeolite is another convenient option for biomass pyrolysis, due to the high acidity and selectivity in deoxygenation reactions, in addition to its larger pores, compared to HZSM-5. Mayer et al. [36] evaluated the performance of beta zeolite in the pyrolysis of MDF to produce BTX. Beta zeolite has wide pores (~6 Å ×~7 Å), which facilitate the diffusion of the products of primary thermal degradation of biomass, improving the conversion and stability of the catalyst. Among the catalysts, beta zeolite was more active in removing the oxygen from pyrolytic vapors of pre-treated MDF (99%), and in the production of aromatic hydrocarbons (AH). However, high amounts of toxic PAH, such as benzo(a)pyrene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, naphthalene, benzo(a)anthracene and chrysene, with potential carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic activities [93], were also produced. This is related to the large pores of beta zeolite, which allow the diffusion of primary products, and then, PAH are produced on acidic sites. This problem was overcome by introducing nickel, resulting in a bifunctional catalyst, which hindered the PAH production and increased the selectivity towards BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes). The decrease in PAH production was related to the cooperative action of metallic sites from nickel and acid sites of beta zeolite, which is efficient in multi-ring-opening reactions, decreasing the PAH content. Due to the ability of nickel to hydrogenate, it breaks the PAH molecules, forming tetralin or its derivatives. In the second step, these molecules undergo cracking over acid sites. In addition, the efficiency of the nickel catalysts was associated with the aluminum chemical environments, which were changed, altering the activity, the amount and the strength of acid sites. The increased BTEX production was assigned to the increased activity in cracking/hydrocracking, hydrogenation/dehydrogenation and isomerization producing aromatics over the stronger sites. For these catalysts, the number of oxygenated compounds increased, indicating lower activity of these catalysts in the reactions related to oxygen removal, mainly HDO and deoxygenation. This finding was related to the decrease in Brønsted sites due to nickel incorporation.
For hierarchical zeolites, nickel loading also affects selectivity. Beta zeolite loaded with nickel, for instance, led to high selectivity toward gasoline range products. However, the increase in activity depends on zeolites, as observed by Escola et al. [94]. They detected a substantial reduction in olefin conversion when hierarchical Ni/ZSM-5, instead of Ni/beta, zeolite was used, which was assigned to an insufficient balance between acid and metal functions [94]. In another work, Dai et al. [95] reported that, in the pyrolysis of torrefied corn on the cob over a Ni-modified hierarchical ZSM-5 catalyst, activation energy was decreased for nickel-based catalysts. Furthermore, higher yields of aromatic hydrocarbons were produced, although the acidity of the catalyst decreased [95].
Zeolites modified with a basic component can also be used in biomass pyrolysis. Hernando et al. [96], for instance, found that the addition of magnesium and zinc to ZSM-5 and beta hierarchical zeolites increased bio-oil yield and the degree of deoxygenation, in addition to decreasing coke formation.
In general, the use of a basic catalyst leads to a decrease in oxygenates and acidic compounds in bio-oil produced from catalytic pyrolysis, improving its quality. Although basic catalysts are not efficient for C-C bond cleavage, basic site selectivity favored double bond migration, and then, C-C bond cleavage is facilitated during deoxygenation reactions [97]. Furthermore, basic catalysts are more selective to deoxygenation than their acidic counterparts. Basic catalysts are very resistant to deactivation by coke, since it promotes the continuous removal of oxygen as water and carbon oxides, in addition to the large pores of zeolites [98]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that basic catalysts are able to convert acidic fractions, such as carboxylic acid, into hydrocarbons through decarboxylation [99].

Acidic and Basic Metal Oxide Catalysts
No simple trend has been noted for the behavior of acidic metal oxides (alumina, silica and alumina-silica) in biomass pyrolysis. The strength and quantity of acidic sites can lead to the selectivity of aromatic compounds, anhydrosugars and furans [13,[100][101][102]. In general, the use of acidic metal oxide alters the distribution of the liquid product, while decreasing its yield. In addition, solid and gas yields can be increased. Chen et al. [103] compared the balance between the yield and quality of bio-oil produced during catalytic pyrolysis of cotton stalks using a fixed-bed reactor. The bio-oil quality was measured by acidity, resistance against corrosivity, aging and viscosity in a similar way to diesel [104]. The balance between yield and bio-oil quality can be determined by improving bio-oil quality with the smallest decrease in bio-oil yield [103].
Acidic (alumina), basic (calcium oxide and magnesium oxide), transition (copper oxide, iron oxide, nickel oxide, zinc oxide and titania) metal oxide, HZSM-5 and MCM-41 were compared. Alumina showed a more pronounced increase in gas phase yield compared to the other catalysts. The composition of the gas phase was also changed; carbon dioxide content was reduced, while carbon monoxide increased. This behavior was related to decarbonization reactions. Alumina, HZSM-5 and MCM-41 showed the best performance in bio-oil deoxygenation, but alumina showed the best balance between bio-oil yield and quality, along with calcium oxide and nickel oxide. These three catalysts (alumina, calcium oxide and nickel oxide) produced the lowest removal of oxygen as water, when compared to the others, suggesting that dehydration was not favored by the balance between yield and bio-oil quality [103]. Therefore, these catalysts were the least efficient in removing oxygen among the studied catalysts.
Metal oxides have been used in both in situ and ex situ pyrolysis of biomass, aiming to selectively obtain high-added value in chemicals for industry, such as phenolic compounds, ketones and furans [101]. Table 2 shows some examples of these systems.  Metal oxides are of great interest because of their acid/base or redox properties. In addition, they are non-toxic, widely available, inexpensive and, in general, improve the quality and stability of bio-oil. They can be divided into basic, acidic and transition metal oxides [13]. Calcium oxide (CaO) and magnesium oxide (MgO) are the main representatives of the class of basic metallic oxides [37,120]. Calcium oxide has strong basic sites, while magnesium oxide has moderate strength basic sites [105]. Calcium oxide has been used in a pure form [108,121], modified with other metals [115,122], as a mixed oxide [112,113] or mixed with zeolites [123] in the pyrolysis of biomass. Other species of Ca 2+ (Ca(OH) 2 and Ca(COOH) 2 ) have also been used [109]. In addition, several other oxides have been studied, and their performances have been frequently discussed and compared. Potassium oxide (K 2 O) [124] and barium oxide (BaO) [112] are some of the basic metallic oxides that have been investigated.
In general, catalysts with basic characteristics benefit the formation of ketones through ketonization and aldol condensation reactions of carboxylic acids [125]. The elimination of carboxylic acids results in the deacidification and deoxygenation of the bio-oil [37,106,[108][109][110]113,123]. Calcium oxide can promote dehydration, decarbonization, decarboxylation and cracking reactions, and thus, generates a bio-oil with decreased oxygen content, low acidity and, consequently, greater stability and calorific value. Studies have also highlighted its tendency to capture carbon dioxide produced by reactions (e.g., ketonization) and to produce calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ). In this case, the carbon dioxide content is reduced, while hydrogen and carbon monoxide are increased. The increase in solid phase yield is expected due to the formation of calcium carbonate [108,126].
Chong et al. [106] compared the performance of calcium oxide, magnesium oxide and zinc oxide in the fast pyrolysis of fiber-derived fruit in a fixed bed reactor. In general, all oxides improved the quality of the bio-oil. Magnesium oxide showed slightly higher efficiency in the decrease of levoglucosan, resulting in the deoxygenation of bio-oil. The reduction was attributed to the decomposition properties of magnesium oxide. Although magnesium and zinc oxides decreased bio-oil acidity, calcium oxide was the most efficient in deacidifying the bio-oil, through the conversion of carboxylic acids to ketones and the dehydration of carbon dioxide. The increase in water content was observed for all catalysts and assigned to dehydration at high temperatures [106].
Basic metallic oxides impregnated with metals and mixed metallic oxides have been investigated in the pyrolysis of biomass in order to increase the catalytic activity of the simple oxide. Vichaphund et al. [115], for instance, evaluated the performance of calcium impregnated with 5 wt% iron (Fe/CaO) or 5 wt% nickel (Ni/CaO) in the pyrolysis of jatropha residues over different biomass/catalyst ratios (1/1 and 1/5). Impregnation altered the textural characteristics, such as specific surface area, pore volume and pore size, measured by nitrogen adsorption-desorption, in addition to the acidic characteristics of the oxide. The strength and number of basic sites increased, and some acidic sites were created, according to their determination by carbon dioxide temperature-programmed desorption (CO 2 -TPD) and ammonia temperature-programmed desorption (NH 3 -TPD), respectively. The characterization of the pyrolysis vapors showed that the catalysts decreased nitrogen and oxygen content as a result of denitrogenation and deoxygenation reactions (decarbonization, decarboxylation and cracking), respectively. Carboxylic acids and sugars were completely eliminated through decarboxylation reactions. In particular, the catalysts, Ni/CaO (47.5%), considerably increased the aliphatic hydrocarbon content [115].
In another work, Li et al. [112] investigated a selective catalyst for the production of 4-vinyl-phenol (4-VP) through bagasse pyrolysis. The study showed that by-product formation is inhibited by catalysts with strong basic sites (calcium and magnesium oxides), while 4-VP precursors were not catalyzed. On the other hand, barium oxide, which has low basicity, showed the opposite behavior and low selectivity. Several mixed oxides were proposed to adjust the basicity of the catalyst and increase the selectivity of 4-VP. Among the mixed catalysts, barium-magnesium mixed oxide (BaMg-MMO) led to a maximum yield of 7.3 wt% and showed a selectivity of 44.4%, compared to 5.0 wt% observed in non-catalyzed pyrolysis [112].
Catalysts based on basic and transition metal oxides are the most suitable for the production of phenolic compounds due to their basic characteristics [101]. However, the production of phenols or any other value-added chemical compound depends not only on the catalyst, but also on the pyrolysis conditions (temperature, reactor, residence time) and biomass characteristics [101].
Transition metal oxides also have acid-base characteristics in addition to redox properties. Examples of transition metal oxides are zinc oxide, nickel oxide, zirconia oxide, iron oxide, niobium oxide and ceria oxide, among others [100][101][102]110]. Although it is not possible to describe a unique behavior for this class, there is a tendency that the higher the acidity/basicity ratio, the more favorable the catalyst will be to catalyze dehydration, depolymerization, C-C or C-O cleavage and ring-opening reactions. This set of reactions contributes to the reduction of anhydrous sugars and the increase of aldehydes, furans and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Higher acidity catalysts have also exhibited a positive effect on aromatics [38,125] and phenolics formation [101]. Oxides based on cerium, chromium, iron, manganese and vanadium have multiple valences, and can be partially reduced to generate oxygen vacancies, which play important roles in polymerization reactions. However, this approach is still under discussion in the literature. On the other hand, nickel, cobalt or copper oxides can be reduced to metallic form and act in cracking reactions. The reduction of species occurs due to the reducing environment of the pyrolysis process, caused by the hydrogen-rich atmosphere [38,111].
Zhang et al. [38] investigated the effect of nine transition metal oxides (CoO, Cr 2 O 3 , CuO, Fe 2 O 3 , Mn 2 O 3 , NiO, TiO 2 , V 2 O 5 and CeO 2 ) on the catalytic pyrolysis of poplar wood in a fixed-bed reactor. All catalysts decreased gas and bio-oil yields and promoted the production of alcohols, furans, ketones, acetic acid and phenolics, except iron oxide. Oxides based on cerium, chromium, copper and iron increased the yield of light organic compounds, indicating the promotion of cracking reactions. On the other hand, the oxides of vanadium, manganese, titanium and cobalt favored condensation reactions, explaining the increase in heavier organics. The nickel-based catalyst increased the yield of heavy and light organics, indicating that both reactions probably occur due to nickel oxide. Metallic nickel, which acts in the cracking reactions, was confirmed by X-ray diffraction [38].
Locatel et al. [114] evaluated mixed niobium oxides with tungsten, aluminum or manganese in ex situ conversion of wood pyrolysis vapors. The results were compared with a reference catalyst (HZSM-5). Mixed oxides with mesopores contributed to better diffusion of larger compounds and better use of available acid sites. The manganese and aluminum-containing catalysts increased the content of hydrogen and carbon oxides in the gas phase, as well as HZSM-5. All catalysts reduced the oxygen content, the manganesebased sample (−39%) being the most similar to HZSM-5 (−46%), although their acidic characteristics were different, the first showing only Lewis acidic sites. It was not possible to establish a correlation between the acidic properties of the catalysts and those of the bio-oil. However, several studies have shown that, under a large amount of steam produced in pyrolysis, the Lewis acidic sites of niobium oxide can be converted into Brønsted acid sites, which may explain the similar performance to HZSM-5 [114].

Metal Salts Catalysts
Regarding metal salts used in biomass pyrolysis, they are classified as alkali or alkaline earth salts (sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium salts), transition metal salts (copper, iron, magnesium, nickel and zinc salts) and organic acids (ammonium salts) [11]. The effect of these metallic salts on fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass has shown varied results, which depend not only on the metal, but also on the related anion. Metallic salts are commonly used in the initial phase of pyrolysis, impregnated to the biomass, by placing biomass in contact with an aqueous solution of the metallic salt of a known concentration and for a certain time. Subsequently, the solution is filtered and dried in an oven to remove moisture [11,37].
The studies carried out with bamboo (a low-cost and very popular material) impregnated with iron salts have shown different results, depending on the salt. The different performances of iron nitrate, iron (II) sulfate, ferrous and ferric chloride and iron (III) sulfate were related to the anion and to the valence of iron [117,118]. In general, iron salts affect biomass decomposition in two ways: (i) decreasing biomass crystallinity during impregnation; and (ii) promoting the breakdown of the glycosidic bond, removing water and accelerating char formation during pyrolysis. Iron nitrate increased the gas yield (carbon dioxide and hydrogen). Ferrous and ferric chloride produced a ketones-rich bio-oil (~86%). On the other hand, (iii) iron sulfate greatly increased the content of acidic compounds (11 to 74%), which are undesirable in bio-oil [117]. The decrease in biomass crystallinity can be related to the hydrolysis of cellulose crystals during iron impregnation. Iron salts are able to break hydrogen linkage bonds of cellulose [127], and then weaken the ether bond between carbohydrates and lignin during hydrolysis reactions [128]. The crystallinity of biomass before and after salt impregnation was detected by X-ray diffraction [117].
The effect of anions on catalyst performance has also been observed for metal nitrates [118]. The pyrolysis of eucalyptus over nitrate-based catalysts (mainly manganese, nickel and cerium) also led to an increase in gaseous product yields, mainly carbon dioxide. This indicates that nitrates promoted decarboxylation reactions, which play an important role in bio-oil deoxygenation. In this study, the production of anhydrous sugars was also investigated. Specific compounds of the class of anhydrosugars (1-hydroxy-(1R)-3,6dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-2-one) were detected during pyrolysis of eucalyptus impregnated with several nitrates, including zinc and cobalt nitrate.
Magnesium chloride and zinc chloride are also able to modify the biomass degradation profile and distribution of pyrolysis products. Both catalysts increased furfural (especially zinc chloride) and char content. In this case, the decrease in the biomass decomposition temperature may have been responsible for inhibiting the pyrolysis of lignin and the cleavage of the holocellulose rings, favoring the depolymerization of holocellulose to form furfural [119].
It has been found [116] that organic salts increase the yields of phenols and ketones, and decrease the content of highly oxygenated compounds (carboxylic acids and esters). The effect of potassium formate, nickel formate, zinc formate, nickel chloride, potassium chloride and zinc chloride on corn straw pyrolysis, for instance, was investigated by Jiang H. [116]. The formates showed different behaviors due to their physicochemical properties and the catalytic action of the metal cation. The bio-oil yield was increased by nickel formate, followed by zinc formate. At high temperatures, formates were decomposed into hydrogen and other compounds. Hydrogen reacted with organic fragments to form a liquid product. Nickel catalyzes hydrogenation, explaining the high yield of bio-oil. On the other hand, potassium formate promotes secondary reactions of primary compounds due to the strong catalytic activity of potassium, which may also be related to the increase in phenols production. Hydrogen also enhanced the hydrogenation of acidic functional groups that promote the dehydroxylation of acids to form ketones, whereas the reactivity of the metal enhances the cleavage of esters, especially on potassium formate.

Acidic and Basic Carbonaceous Catalysts
The acidic and basic properties of activated carbons are related to the surface functional groups, generated by the interaction of the carbon atoms and heteroatoms, such as oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, sulfur and phosphorus. They are mainly formed by the most reactive carbon atoms on the surface, such as the edges of the carbon particles and the delocalized electrons of the structure [129]. The kind and the amount of these groups depend on the precursor material, or on their introduction during the activation process or through special treatments [129,130]. Oxygen is the most important heteroatom, influencing the application of activated carbon, since they affect the electrical and catalytic properties of activated carbons [130].
Ketones, phenols, ethers and lactones (formed from oxygen) groups, as well as amines, nitro and phosphate groups, can determine the acidity or the basicity of activated carbons. Functional groups containing oxygen are the most abundant due to the susceptibility of the carbon surface to react with oxygen in the air [131]. Acid surfaces are characterized by carboxylic, phenolic, lactone, carboxylic anhydride and peroxide groups. The oxygen atoms present in carbonyl groups and ethers are neutral, or can form basic structures. On the other hand, quinones, chromenes and pyrones are responsible for the basic character of activated carbon. The acidic groups are well known, while the basic surfaces of charcoal still remain under investigation [130]. Figure 8 illustrates the functional groups on the coal surface [129]. The presence of acid groups gives activated carbon a more hydrophilic character, in addition to affecting the specific surface area and pore structure [132].
Although several works have addressed the use of activated carbon for pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass (Table 1), only a few of them correlated catalyst performance with the surface groups. Ye et al. [73] studied the performance of different catalysts to selectively produce levoglucosenone, by fast pyrolysis of cellulose and biomass (sugar cane bagasse, poplar wood and pine wood). The carbon-based catalysts were prepared from sugar cane bagasse and activated by different methods: chemical activation, using phosphoric acid and zinc chloride, and physical activation, using steam and carbon dioxide. They were compared to a strong acid catalyst (sulfated zirconia). From X-photoelectronic spectroscopy, it has been noted that all catalysts have oxygenated groups, while the carbon activated with phosphoric acids also has C-O-PO 3 and C-PO 3 groups. These groups were related to the highest selectivity of these catalysts in levoglucosenone production.
Some years later, Zhan et al. [75] studied activated carbons enriched in phosphoruscontaining functional prepared by one-pot microwave-induced pyrolysis of corn stover. Phosphorous groups, such as -O-P, O=P and -O-P-O-, have been considered the active sites for producing monophenol from cellulose pyrolysis for the first time. The highest yield (44.3 wt%) was obtained with an acid-to-biomass ratio of 0.85. characterized by carboxylic, phenolic, lactone, carboxylic anhydride and peroxide groups. The oxygen atoms present in carbonyl groups and ethers are neutral, or can form basic structures. On the other hand, quinones, chromenes and pyrones are responsible for the basic character of activated carbon. The acidic groups are well known, while the basic surfaces of charcoal still remain under investigation [130]. Figure 8 illustrates the functional groups on the coal surface [129]. The presence of acid groups gives activated carbon a more hydrophilic character, in addition to affecting the specific surface area and pore structure [132]. Although several works have addressed the use of activated carbon for pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass (Table 1), only a few of them correlated catalyst performance with the surface groups. Ye et al. [73] studied the performance of different catalysts to selectively produce levoglucosenone, by fast pyrolysis of cellulose and biomass (sugar cane bagasse, poplar wood and pine wood). The carbon-based catalysts were prepared from sugar cane bagasse and activated by different methods: chemical activation, using phosphoric acid and zinc chloride, and physical activation, using steam and carbon dioxide. They were compared to a strong acid catalyst (sulfated zirconia). From X-photoelectronic spectroscopy, it has been noted that all catalysts have oxygenated groups, while the carbon activated with phosphoric acids also has C-O-PO3 and C-PO3 groups. These groups were related to the highest selectivity of these catalysts in levoglucosenone production.
Some years later, Zhan et al. [75] studied activated carbons enriched in phosphoruscontaining functional prepared by one-pot microwave-induced pyrolysis of corn stover. Phosphorous groups, such as -O-P, O=P and -O-P-O-, have been considered the active On the other hand, Yang et al. [61] demonstrated the role of oxygenated groups in catalyzing biomass pyrolysis to produce high value products. The catalysts were prepared in bamboo-derived biochar activated at 1073 K, using potassium hydroxide, potassium carbonate, potassium hydrogen carbonate or potassium acetate. During the catalytic pyrolysis, the bio-oil yield decreased, and the gas yield increased, while phenols and aromatics yield significantly increased, and the number of oxygenated species and acetic acid decreased. It has been concluded that activated biochar catalysts act as both catalyst and reactants during the catalytic pyrolysis process.

Redox Properties of the Catalysts
The redox properties of catalysts for biomass pyrolysis are mostly related to the metal supported on different solids, giving rise to bifunctional catalysts. They play an important role in the process of producing fuels and chemicals, since they usually show a selectivity higher than the acidic or basic catalysts. This is related to the activity of metals in several reactions that occur in pyrolysis, and especially in hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reactions, which occur by a redox mechanism.

Zeolites-Based Catalysts
Several metals, such as noble metals (palladium, ruthenium, platinum) [133,134] and transition metals (cobalt, molybdenum, iron and copper) [96,135,136] can be added to zeolites to obtain bifunctional catalysts. As noted in several works, metal loading can decrease the number of Brønsted acid sites and increase the amount of Lewis acid sites. The specific surface area can also be affected due to metallic species that can block the pores of the zeolites. Table 3 shows some examples of bifunctional catalysts containing different metals at different loadings.
Iron-based catalysts have been used in many studies to obtain upgraded bio-oil. However, iron decreases PAH (especially naphthalene) yields during pyrolysis and enhances BTEX production [54]. This behavior suggests that iron can inhibit the secondary cyclization of monoaromatics to form polyaromatics. This results in a decrease in bio-oil and an increase in gas production [137]. In agreement with these results, Dai et al. [138] noted that iron on hierarchical HZSM-5 negatively impacts aromatic yields, despite the tendency of producing more monoaromatics and less PAH [138]. Similar results were found by Zhang et al. [137], who reported that the yield of upgraded bio-oil decreased during pyrolysis of rice husks over high iron loading on ZSM-5. They observed non-significant changes in hydrocarbon yield above 4% iron loading in ZSM-5. This finding was related to the decrease in the specific surface area, increasing mass transfer resistance [137].
Copper has also been investigated as zeolite-based catalysts for biomass pyrolysis. Kumar et al. [139], for example, compared the deoxygenating activity of copper and iron over a commercial zeolite catalyst (25% silica-alumina, 0.35% Na 2 O) for bio-oil pyrolysis of pine wood. They noted that the copper-based catalyst produced 5.05% phenols and 1.16% ketones, whereas the nickel-based zeolite generated 2.24% phenols and 1.02% ketones; no aldehyde was detected in any bio-oil sample. Despite this, the addition of metal promoted greater production of aromatics than the non-catalytic pyrolysis, especially at high catalyst/biomass ratios. This was related to the higher amount of available active sites, resulting in more deoxygenation of bio-oil and in the production of hydrocarbons [104].
A combination of the two metals has also been used in zeolite catalysts for biomass pyrolysis, generating bimetallic catalysts. This takes advantage of the possible synergistic effect that can promote different reactions, improving the final bio-oil [140]. Zheng et al. [141], for example, evaluated the activity and selectivity of nickel and copper supported on HZSM-5, during the pine wood conversion for producing bio-aromatic and bio-phenols. The bimetallic catalysts showed higher deoxygenation efficiency than the monometallic ones. Higher nickel loads promoted decarbonylation, decarboxylation and aromatization reactions, while higher copper loading increased the yields of olefins and phenols due to the dehydration and demethylation reactions [141]. Molybdenum combined with cobalt, iron or nickel supported on hierarchical HZSM-5 have also been investigated [142]. The NiMo/ZSM-5 catalyst exhibited less coke and converted more high-order graphite carbon to low-order carbon than the other catalysts. In addition, it showed the highest MAH production and the minimum selectivity of oxygenates.

Oxide-Based Catalysts
The addition of metals to oxides aims to promote the catalytic activity of the simple oxide through the combination of the acidic or basic sites of the support and the metallic sites of the impregnated metal. Although it is not possible to attribute a single behavior to these bifunctional catalysts, studies have shown that metal impregnation (noble metals, nickel, iron and cobalt) alters the acidic and textural characteristics of the support, leading to a reduction in the content of oxygenated compounds and nitrogenous [115,120,152].
Zhang et al. [153] impregnated iron on calcium oxide, obtaining a bifunctional catalyst that was used in sawdust pyrolysis. Iron prevented catalyst deactivation and the bifunctional catalyst converted heavy phenols into light phenols, eliminating acidic compounds and decreasing the content of aldehydes and ketones. In contrast, furans, light and aromatic hydrocarbons were increased. The better performance of the bifunctional catalyst was related to the synergistic action between calcium oxide and iron, forming the active Ca 2 Fe 2 O 5 . A similar effect was found by Sun et al. [122].
Kantarelis, Yang and Blasiak [154] investigated the effects of nickel and vanadium supported on silica on the composition of pyrolysis vapors from a mixture of pine and spruce. Both catalysts were active in vapor deoxygenation and phenol production. The nickel catalyst was selective to aromatics, while the vanadium catalyst decreased acids and ketones. The in situ reduction of nickel oxide during pyrolysis reactions was supposed to potentiate H transfer reactions during the process.

Catalyst to Biomass Ratio
Catalyst loading is also an important variable to be considered in biomass pyrolysis as it significantly affects the yield and distribution of the products. This dependence is related to catalyst activity in deoxygenation reactions, releasing oxygen as water and carbon monoxide and dioxide. It has been found [16] that dehydration is a dominant pathway when the catalyst-to-biomass ratio is very low, and that decarbonylation increases with increasing catalyst amounts. The optimal catalyst/biomass ratio was found to be between 0.3 and 0.7 [155]. Higher catalyst loading can lead to excessive cracking of pyrolytic vapors and lower bio-oil yields, in addition to fast catalyst deactivation by coke [156]. Excessive deoxygenation under higher catalyst loading also increases aromatic fractions in pyrolysis liquids [157].
By studying the pyrolysis of paddy husk over a ZSM-5 catalyst, Naqvi et al. [158] found that bio-oil and bio-char yields decreased, and gas yields increased with an increasing in catalyst-to-biomass ratios. The lowest ratio (0.5) led to the maximum bio-oil yield (35.5%). The bio-oil yields decreased from 42% to 30% by increasing the catalyst from 5% to 20%. In addition, Zhou et al. [159] found that bio-oil yields decreased by 6%, but the yields of small molecule compounds in bio-oils increased with an increasing zinc oxide catalyst (5-20%). Furthermore, at higher amounts of catalyst, deoxygenation of unwanted species increased in gas yields from 21.38% to 28.74% (wt.), while biochar yields did not significantly change. Several operational challenges related to tar formation in pipes resulted from the use of high amounts of the basic catalyst (calcium oxide), causing a decrease in bio-oil yields and favoring secondary reactions to volatiles and tar, as reported by Veses et al. [113]. In another work, using sepiolite, it has been found that excess amounts of the catalyst were not appropriate for obtaining higher bio-oil yields. Decreasing the amounts of sepiolite, the bio-oil and gas yields were increased with a sharp drop in bio-char [160].
In general, the higher the loading of acidic zeolite, the lower the bio-oil production. Increasing the catalyst-to-biomass ratio from 1:2 to 1:1, for instance, bio-oil yields decreased from 50.41% to 29.37% w/w [161]. On the other hand, a higher catalyst-to-biomass ratio produces more hydrocarbons, while the relative amounts of oxygenates (ketones, aldehydes and carboxylic compounds) significantly decreased. Therefore, high-quality bio-oil (rich in hydrocarbons and poor in oxygenates) can be obtained over zeolites, such as ZSM-5; a fact that is also related to its tridimensional intersecting pore structure. The increase in catalyst-to-biomass ratio and of a unit mass of zeolite facilitates the diffusion of large molecules into internal channels, where they produce smaller hydrocarbons and coke deposition [157].

Co-Pyrolysis of Biomass and Hydrogen Donors
One of the most important differences between biomass and oil feedstocks is the high number of oxygenated compounds in the former. This difference in composition prevents the use of most of the mature technologies developed for petroleum refining in new biorefineries. This has motivated researchers to look for efficient methods for the removal of oxygen, such as water, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, or other compounds, such as alcohols, aldehydes and acids. However, this consumes carbon and hydrogen during pyrolysis, decreasing the efficiency of the process. To overcome this problem, the technology of co-pyrolysis was proposed, in which pyrolysis of biomass occurs in the presence of some hydrogen donors, such as plastics, ethanol and methanol, to prepare liquid fuels and high value-added chemicals [13]. Among them, plastic residues emerge as the most economical and environmentally friendly option, because of their large consumption around the world. It is estimated that the worldwide generation of plastic-based waste is around 1.3 billion tons per year, and a value of 2.2 billion tons is expected over the next few years [162].
Several types of catalysts have been evaluated in the co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastics, such as metal oxides, alumina, spent FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking) catalysts and zeolites. Spent FCC and larger-pore zeolites are suitable for obtaining liquid hydrocarbons; zeolites being especially appropriate due to large specific surface areas, thermal stability and high acidity. In addition, the cooperative action of these properties can be adjusted to promote bio-oil formation and/or to inhibit solids production [13,162].
An alternative by which to enhance selectivity towards aromatic hydrocarbons, during biomass pyrolysis, is the addition of plastics, such as low-density polyethylene (LDPE), generating the so-called co-pyrolysis. In this process, hydrogen is supplied to the reaction as the hydrogen-to-carbon ratio of LDPE is higher than that of biomass. Furthermore, the use of both species tends to inhibit catalyst deactivation, as well as to reduce solid residue formation. For example, Zheng et al. [163] studied the co-pyrolysis of LDPE and pine sawdust (cellulose), and found an improvement in BTEX yield and selectivity to naphthalene and naphthalene-derived species, while lowering the compounds bigger than C10 aromatics. Yang et al. [164] studied LDPE co-pyrolysis with cedarwood, sunflower stalk and Fallopia japonica stem at a maximum temperature of 600 • C. The pyrolysis of only cedarwood yielded 38.3% of bio-oil, 14.7% of gas, 25.74% of water and 20.73% of char. When LDPE was added to biomass, oil yields jumped up to 64.08%, with 7.98% of the yield being the gas phase, 15.94% being water, 9.32% being residual solids and 2.69% being wax.
Co-pyrolysis of biomass and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) can improve selectivity when compared to HDPE pyrolysis. Rahman et al. [165], for instance, performed co-pyrolysis ex situ of HDPE and pine sawdust at different ratios (0:100, 25:75 and 50:50 and at 723, 773 and 823 K) over ZSM-5. As expected, low ratios of biomass-to-plastic yielded the smallest percentage of bio-oil, while raising the temperature made HDPE decomposition easier. At 823 K, a decrease in yield was noted, probably due to the further cracking of species into even lighter species. At high biomass-to-plastic ratios, the inverse trend was observed. At 25-to-75 or 50-to-50 ratios, there was no noticeable temperature effect on the liquid phase yield. However, by raising the biomass fraction, the liquid yield was raised at low temperatures, as expected, since low temperatures favor biomass pyrolysis. At higher temperatures, the condensable species cracked even more into non-condensable ones. The solid residue presented both molten plastic and pine fibers, probably due to the effect of molten plastic, which hindered the pyrolysis of biomass fibers. This effect also explains the less oil yield when more char was generated. The highest bio-oil yield (22.5%) was obtained at 25-to-75 ratio and 500 • C, with 7.3% of solids and 69.7% of gasses. Varying the pine-to-HDPE ratio from 100 to 0, 75 to 25, 50 to 50, 25 to 75 and 0 to 100, the selectivity for gasoline-ranged hydrocarbons was 68.9%, 94.5%, 100%, 98.7% and 100%, respectively, at 523 K. This effect can be explained by the gradual increase in the hydrogen-to-carbon ratio.
In another work, Hassan, Hameed and Lim, [166] studied the co-pyrolysis of HDPE and sugarcane bagasse in the range of 673-973 K, using biomass-to-plastic ratios from 0% to 100%. The highest bio-oil yield was noted at 873 K, at a 3-to-2 ratio, the formation of oxygenated compounds was inhibited, and the production of aromatics, hydrocarbons and alcohol was promoted.
Co-pyrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and biomass can reduce the generation of aromatic polycyclic species, operating under moderate temperatures; however, under higher temperatures, such species formation tends to increase. Izzatie et al. [167] carried out rice straw and PET co-pyrolysis at a 1-to-1 ratio in a fixed-bed reactor, under 723, 773, 823 and 873 K. They obtained 36% of bio-oil, 44.67% of gasses and 19.33% of solid residue. Çepeliogullar and Pütün, [168] co-pyrolyzed hazelnut shell and PET, at a 1-to-1 ratio, at 773 K. Compared to pyrolysis of biomass alone, the bio-oil and gas fractions presented higher yields (10.67% and 6.40%, respectively), while water and solid production decreased by 13.56% and 4.67%, respectively. The bio-oil obtained from biomass-only contained 79.85% of phenolic species, while the bio-oil from co-pyrolysis was composed of 4.64% phenolic species, 22.42% benzene-derived species and 59.83% acids and esters.
Izzatie et al. [167] co-pyrolyzed rice straw and polypropylene (PP) at a 1-to-1 ratio under similar operating conditions using rice straw and PET. The highest yield of the oil fraction was 69% at 823 K, along with 20.5% gasses and 10.5% solid residue. The bio-oil was also composed of furfural, 2-methyl naphthalene, tetrahydrofuran, toluene and acetaldehyde.
Abnisa et al. [169] performed co-pyrolysis of palm shells and polystyrene (PS) in a fixed-bed reactor at 400 • C and a 4:6 biomass-to-plastic ratio, obtaining 65% bio-oil yield, 20% gasses and 15% char. Stancin et al. [170] co-pyrolyzed sawdust and solid wasterecovered PS in fixed-bed reactors, operating at 873 K under various biomass-to-plastic ratios. The highest yield of oils was of 84% at a 3-to-1 ratio; the lowest being 62% at a 1:3 ratio.
One of the advantages of co-pyrolysis of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is less emission of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, such as acenaphthylene, naphthalene, acenaphthene and others, as well as less hydrochloric acid generation. While pyrolyzing rice husk and PVC over magnesium oxide and magnesium carbonate, a slight decrease in acid content and increased hydrocarbon generation over 35% was observed [171]. Çepeliogullar and Pütün [168] performed co-pyrolysis of hazelnut shell and PVC in a fixed-bed reactor at 773 K and at a 1-to-1 ratio. The pyrolysis of only hazelnut shells generated 18.22% bio-oil (containing 79.85% of phenolics), 18.17% water, 33.51% of non-condensable gasses and 30.1% of solid residue. Meanwhile, the co-pyrolysis produced 15.26% of oil (no phenolic species, but 51.3% of naphthenic derivatives), 15.34% of water, 43.62% of gasses and 25.78% of residues. In another work [172], a previous PVC dichlorination step decreased 75 wt% of chlorine in the liquid fraction, but also decreased catalyst activity. It was not clear if the activity loss was related to physical mechanisms (such as molten plastic blocking the catalyst pores) or to chemical mechanisms (such as conventional catalyst poisoning).

Guidelines for Selecting Catalysts for Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass
Catalytic pyrolysis offers new opportunities to produce high quality fuels and chemicals by an economical, eco-friendly and simple route using lignocellulosic biomass, a cheap and widespread feedstock. The properties and the availability of different kinds of catalysts make possible the accurate design of a solid focusing mainly on the specific surface area and porosity, the strength and distribution of acidic and basic sites, as well as redox properties, which are responsible for catalytic activity and selectivity towards the desired products. Because of the complexity of biomass, pyrolysis involves a reaction network with numerous different pathways, each one affected by the catalyst according to its own kinetics. The kind of biomass and the process variables, such as temperature, heating rate, biomass-to-catalyst ratio and use of hydrogen donors, among others, also affect the reactions. This dependence requires a specific catalyst and the optimization of the process variables for each biomass. This makes catalyst design strongly dependent on experimental research. In spite of this, the relationships between the catalyst properties and the pyrolysis products, discussed in this review, can provide a guideline for accelerating the experimental studies to achieve the target products, as shown below.

1.
The acidic sites facilitate the breaking of C-C and C-O bonds, and then are able to catalyze the majority of reactions that occur during the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass, such as cracking, aromatization, dehydration, decarboxylation, decarbonylation, oligomerization, polymerization/depolymerization, ketylation and H-transfer reactions.

2.
The metallic sites act cooperatively with the acidic sites through a bifunctional mechanism, and also promote hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reactions.

3.
Acidic zeolites and hierarchical zeolites are the most studied catalysts for lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis because of intrinsic acidity and large pores. In addition, the pores can be tailored to favor the formation of the desired products by shape selectivity. Due to these properties, they are the best option by which to obtain monoaromatics, such as the high-value benzene, toluene and xylenes (BTX), without polyaromatics and coke formation. However, large pores can also allow the production of undesirable polyaromatics, which, in turn, can be avoided by the metal. Therefore, the pores have to be modulated. The use of a metal is usually beneficial in such cases.

4.
Catalysts based on acidic metal oxides usually lead to the production of aromatics, anhydrosugars and furans, in addition to gasses and solids, during pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass; however, the kind and distribution of products depend on the metal oxide.

5.
Activated carbons are normally used to catalyze the production of levoglucosenone and phenols. The activity and selectivity of such catalysts are modulated by functional groups on the surface. 6.
Alkali and alkaline earth metal oxides selectively catalyze the formation of phenolic compounds, ketones and furans, but also produce high-quality bio-oil. On the other hand, transition metal oxides are the most suitable to produce phenolic compounds because of their basic properties. The balance between acidic and basic sites affects the distribution of products obtained thanks to the formation of other compounds, such as alcohols, furans, ketones and phenolics. 7.
Basic zeolites (modified with a basic component) are also active and selective in biomass pyrolysis producing high quality bio-oil, due to a decrease in oxygenates and acidic compounds, and a small amount of coke. They are usually more active than acidic zeolite in deoxygenation. 8.
The catalyst-to-biomass ratio is a critical process variable for catalyst performance during biomass pyrolysis, the optimal ratio being found between 0.3 and 0.7. However, this range may change according to the catalyst, variable processes and biomass. 9.
The efficiency of pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass can be largely improved by adding hydrogen donors to the process (co-pyrolysis), such as plastics, ethanol and methanol. Several plastics have been studied, including low-(LDPE) and high (HDPE)-density polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and plastic residues. The latter is particularly attractive for environmental reasons. 10. Obtaining target products from biomass pyrolysis requires the careful planning of catalyst properties combined with the process variables according to the biomass to be used. Co-pyrolysis of plastic residues is attractive as an economic and eco-friendly route, providing clean fuels and chemicals, as well as decreasing plastic waste around the world.