Next Article in Journal
Closing the Loop: A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Primary Versus Post-Consumer Recycled Aluminium in Hungarian Automotive Manufacturing and Its Implications for Central European Circular Economy Policy
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Controlled Evaluation of a Multi-Sensor Haptic Proximity Alert System for Bicycles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Critical Fatigue Factors Among Indonesian Seafarers: A Delphi Consensus Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Human, Organisational, and Navigational Factors in Selected North Sea Ship Collisions: A Qualitative Comparative Case Study

by
David Balazs Csaszar
* and
Seyed Behbood Issa-Zadeh
*
School of Maritime Science, University of Gibraltar, Campus Europa Point, Gibraltar GX11 1AA, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Future Transp. 2026, 6(5), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp6050223
Submission received: 13 August 2026 / Revised: 21 September 2026 / Accepted: 1 October 2026 / Published: 3 October 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maritime Transportation Accident Analysis)

Abstract

Ship collisions in the North Sea remain a significant maritime safety concern because the region combines merchant traffic, fishing activity, offshore operations, and traffic separation schemes. This study examines five purposively selected North Sea ship collisions occurring between 2010 and 2023 to identify recurring human, organisational, and navigational factors and develop practical lessons for reducing collision risk. A qualitative comparative case-study approach was employed using official Marine Accident Investigation Branch and Dutch Safety Board reports. Documentary analysis and thematic coding covered 22 factors across five cases. The most consistently supported weaknesses concerned lookout and monitoring, situation awareness, risk of collision assessment, and electronic navigational information. Communication, bridge redundancy, and organisational controls also showed deficiencies, although their form and evidential support differed. Evidence concerning fatigue and some organisational explanations was qualified. The cross-case interpretation identified erosion of overlapping safety barriers before impact, while recognising functioning safeguards and limitations in the report evidence. The findings support recommendations for observable watchkeeping standards, effective technology use, bridge-team support, fatigue-aware operations, and organisational verification. These conclusions concern the selected cases and do not establish the frequency or causal strength of the factors across all North Sea collisions.
Keywords: North Sea; ship collision; Human Factors; Bridge Resource Management; Situation Awareness; maritime safety; Safety Barriers North Sea; ship collision; Human Factors; Bridge Resource Management; Situation Awareness; maritime safety; Safety Barriers

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Csaszar, D.B.; Issa-Zadeh, S.B. Human, Organisational, and Navigational Factors in Selected North Sea Ship Collisions: A Qualitative Comparative Case Study. Future Transp. 2026, 6, 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp6050223

AMA Style

Csaszar DB, Issa-Zadeh SB. Human, Organisational, and Navigational Factors in Selected North Sea Ship Collisions: A Qualitative Comparative Case Study. Future Transportation. 2026; 6(5):223. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp6050223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Csaszar, David Balazs, and Seyed Behbood Issa-Zadeh. 2026. "Human, Organisational, and Navigational Factors in Selected North Sea Ship Collisions: A Qualitative Comparative Case Study" Future Transportation 6, no. 5: 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp6050223

APA Style

Csaszar, D. B., & Issa-Zadeh, S. B. (2026). Human, Organisational, and Navigational Factors in Selected North Sea Ship Collisions: A Qualitative Comparative Case Study. Future Transportation, 6(5), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp6050223

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop