A Critical Review of Multi-Energy Microgrids and Urban Air Mobility
Abstract
1. Introduction
- High-power and transient charging demand of UAM: Unlike conventional electric vehicles, eVTOL aircraft require ultra-fast, high-power charging within short turnaround times at vertiports. This creates significant electrical and thermal management challenges for microgrids in addition to renewable intermittency, power balance and stability, and voltage and frequency regulation.
- Coupling mechanism between thermal microgrids and UAM: The integration point lies in microgrid energy and thermal management with vertiports. Similar to EVs, existing works have demonstrated that thermal microgrids can potentially:
- What are the limitations of existing MEM optimization frameworks in the transport sector?
- How can MEMs support the energy and thermal demands of UAM, particularly eVTOL systems?
2. Thermal Energy Modeling in Microgrids
2.1. Review Articles
2.2. Research Articles
3. eVTOL and Microgrid Planning and Operation
3.1. Review Articles
3.2. Research Articles
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CHP | Combined heat and power |
| DER | Distributed energy resources |
| eVTOL | Electric vertical takeoff and landing |
| EVs | Electric vehicles |
| HESO | Hybrid energy storage operator |
| MEMs | Multi-energy microgrids |
| MG | Microgrids |
| TCL | Thermostatically controlled loads |
| TES | Thermal energy storage |
| UAM | Urban air mobility |
References
- Córdova, S.; Cañizares, C.A.; Lorca, Á.; Olivares, D.E. Aggregate Modeling of Thermostatically Controlled Loads for Microgrid Energy Management Systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2023, 14, 4169–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Yuan, Y.; Lai, C.S. Optimizing Urban Air Mobility: A Ground-Connected Approach to Select Optimal eVTOL Takeoff and Landing Sites for Short-Distance Intercity Travel. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2025, 6, 216–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laghari, A.A.; Jumani, A.K.; Laghari, R.A.; Nawaz, H. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Review. Cogn. Robot. 2023, 3, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, C.S.; Jia, Y.; Lai, L.L.; Xu, Z.; McCulloch, M.D.; Wong, K.P. A Comprehensive Review on Large-Scale Photovoltaic System with Applications of Electrical Energy Storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 439–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Song, G.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, J.; Lin, Z.; Yu, Q.; Fu, H.; Song, X.; Zhang, H. Reinforcement Learning for Vehicle-to-Grid: A Review. Adv. Appl. Energy 2025, 17, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrozik, W.; Rajaeifar, M.A.; Heidrich, O.; Christensen, P. Environmental Impacts, Pollution Sources and Pathways of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 6099–6121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, C.S.; Jia, Y.; Dong, Z.; Wang, D.; Tao, Y.; Lai, Q.H.; Wong, R.T.K.; Zobaa, A.F.; Wu, R.; Lai, L.L. A Review of Technical Standards for Smart Cities. Clean. Technol. 2020, 2, 290–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulnasser, G.; Ali, A.; Shaaban, M.F.; Mohamed, E.E.M. Stochastic Multi-Objectives Optimal Scheduling of Energy Hubs with Responsive Demands in Smart Microgrids. J. Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahramara, S.; Shahrokhi, S.; Sheikhahmadi, P.; Khezri, R.; Muyeen, S.M. Modeling the Risk-Based Decisions of the Microgrid in Day-Ahead Energy and Reserve Markets Considering Stochastic Dispatching of Electrical and Thermal Energy Storages. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 14, 100201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolla, D.A.; Fetene, M.G. Investigations of Phase Change Materials in Battery Thermal Management Systems for Electric Vehicles: A Review. Mater. Res. Express 2024, 11, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Lai, C.S.; Chi, H.R.; Wang, H.; Tsang, K.F. Power Systems and eVTOL Optimization with Information Exchange for Green and Safe Urban Air Mobility. Sensors 2026, 26, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ZSW. CoolEV—Recovering Waste Heat During Fast Charging. Available online: www.zsw-bw.de/en/projects/energy-transition-system-optimisation/coolev-recovering-waste-heat-during-fast-charging.html (accessed on 15 April 2026).
- Lai, C.S.; Locatelli, G.; Pimm, A.; Wu, X.; Lai, L.L. A Review on Long-Term Electrical Power System Modeling with Energy Storage. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masrur, H.; Shafie-Khah, M.; Hossain, M.J.; Senjyu, T. Multi-Energy Microgrids Incorporating EV Integration: Optimal Design and Resilient Operation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 3508–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, X.; Guo, Q.; Qiannan, T.; Jermsittiparsert, K. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Multi-Energy Microgrids under a Hybrid Optimization Technique. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 65, 102630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, M.; Wang, D.; Lai, C.S.; Lai, L.L. A Review on Thermal Energy Modelling for Optimal Microgrids Management. Thermo 2021, 1, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Twaisan, K.; Barışçı, N. Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (DER) and Microgrids: Modeling and Optimization of DERs. Electronics 2022, 11, 2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, H.; Fu, Y.; Jia, Q.; Wen, X. Optimal Dispatch of Integrated Energy Microgrid Considering Hybrid Structured Electric-Thermal Energy Storage. Renew. Energy 2022, 199, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazari, M.H.; Bagheri-Sanjareh, M.; Hosseinian, S.H. A New Method for Energy Management of Residential Microgrid for Sizing Electrical and Thermal Storage Systems. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, W. Stochastic Optimization for Capacity Configuration of Data Center Microgrid Thermal Energy Management Equipment Considering Flexible Resources. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 160, 110132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, G.; Huang, K.; Yang, C.; Xu, J. Day-Ahead Scheduling of Microgrid with Hydrogen Energy Considering Economic and Environmental Objectives. Energy Rep. 2024, 12, 1303–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Ren, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, H.; Jiang, H.; Xue, Y.; Ou, J.; Hu, R.; Zhang, J.; Gao, D.W. Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning for Varying-Scale Multi-Energy Microgrids Energy Management Considering Comprehensive Security. Appl. Energy 2025, 380, 125072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y. Optimal Scheduling Strategy of Electricity and Thermal Energy Storage Based on Soft Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning Approach. J. Energy Storage 2024, 92, 112084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zou, Y.; Yang, H.; Fu, X.; Xiang, S.; Li, Z. Two-Stage Stochastic Energy Scheduling for Multi-Energy Rural Microgrids With Irrigation Systems and Biomass Fermentation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2025, 16, 1075–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komeili, M.; Nazarian, P.; Safari, A.; Moradlou, M. Robust Optimal Scheduling of CHP-Based Microgrids in Presence of Wind and Photovoltaic Generation Units: An IGDT Approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 78, 103566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasemi, E.; Ranjbaran, A.; Pourhossein, J. Designing Multi-Objective Electric and Thermal Energy Management System of Microgrid in the Presence of Controllable Loads and Electric Vehicles. Electr. Eng. 2024, 106, 1519–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, S.; Xiao, Q.; Li, T.; Jin, Y.; Mu, Y.; Jia, H.; Li, W.; Teodorescu, R.; Guerrero, J.M. An Optimization Strategy for EV-Integrated Microgrids Considering Peer-to-Peer Transactions. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Wang, X.; Huang, H.; Zhang, D.; Ghadimi, N. Optimal Economic Scheduling of Microgrids Considering Renewable Energy Sources Based on Energy Hub Model Using Demand Response and Improved Water Wave Optimization Algorithm. J. Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Deng, X.; Li, J. Integrated Energy Hub Optimization in Microgrids: Uncertainty-Aware Modeling and Efficient Operation. Energy 2024, 291, 130391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, Z.; Zou, Y.; Hua, W.; Banda, O.V.; Guerrero, J.M.; Li, Z. Weather Routing-Based Multi-Energy Ship Microgrid Operation Under Diverse Uncertainties: A Risk-Averse Stochastic Approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2025, 16, 4648–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correia, A.F.M.; Moura, P.; De Almeida, A.T. Technical and Economic Assessment of Battery Storage and Vehicle-to-Grid Systems in Building Microgrids. Energies 2022, 15, 8905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Huang, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.-Y. eVTOL Performance Analysis: A Review From Control Perspectives. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2024, 9, 4877–4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swaminathan, N.; Reddy, S.R.P.; RajaShekara, K.; Haran, K.S. Flying Cars and eVTOLs—Technology Advancements, Powertrain Architectures, and Design. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 8, 4105–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, S.; Xie, A.; Ye, M.; Yan, X.; Han, X.; Niu, H.; Li, Q.; Huang, H. Autonomous eVTOL: A Summary of Researches and Challenges. Green. Energy Intell. Transp. 2024, 3, 100140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.H. Receding Horizon Scheduling of On-Demand Urban Air Mobility With Heterogeneous Fleet. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2020, 56, 2751–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arafat, M.Y.; Moh, S. JRCS: Joint Routing and Charging Strategy for Logistics Drones. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 21751–21764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.-J.; Hu, K.-W.; Xie, B.Z.; Cheng, H.-W. A Joint Routing and Charging Management for Drones. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Cyber Management and Engineering (CyMaEn); IEEE: Bangkok, Thailand, 2023; pp. 297–300. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Z.; Hao, M.; Liu, J.; Yu, B.; Jiang, Y. Joint Routing and Charging Optimization for eVTOL Aircraft Recovery. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2022, 126, 107595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, L.; Munir, M.d.S.; Hassan, S.S.; Tun, Y.K.; Nguyen, L.X.; Hong, C.S. Imbalance Cost-Aware Energy Scheduling for Prosumers Towards UAM Charging: A Matching and Multi-Agent DRL Approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2024, 73, 3404–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shihab, S.A.M.; Wei, P.; Shi, J.; Yu, N. Optimal eVTOL Fleet Dispatch for Urban Air Mobility and Power Grid Services. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, Virtual Event, 15 June 2020; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Velaz-Acera, N.; Arcauz-Durán, D.; Borge-Diez, D. Life Cycle Assessment of eVTOL Vehicles in Island Systems. Case Study Canary Islands. Transp. Res. Procedia 2023, 71, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J. Integrated Routing and Charging Scheduling for Autonomous Electric Aerial Vehicle System. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC); IEEE: San Diego, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Bulusu, V.; Onat, E.B.; Sengupta, R.; Yedavalli, P.; Macfarlane, J. A Traffic Demand Analysis Method for Urban Air Mobility. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 22, 6039–6047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Ref. | Objective Function | Is TES Considered? | Is Transportation Considered? | Assets Considered | Optimization Algorithm | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tian et al. [27] | EV load distribution and operational cost | A general energy storage model is considered | Yes; only EVs | Wind turbines, EVs, power-to-gas, combined heat and power units, energy storage systems, photovoltaic | Distributed optimization with Lagrange multipliers | For MEMs, the operational costs were reduced by 37.36%. |
| Abdulnasser et al. [8] | Operational cost and emissions | Yes | Yes; only EVs | Wind turbines, EVs, solar heat collectors, energy storage systems, photovoltaic | Multi-objective Gray Wolf optimizer | A total reduction of 9.87% and 21.41% is achieved in the cost and emission amount, respectively, after applying the demand response program. |
| Bahramara et al. [9] | Operational cost | Yes | No | Photovoltaic, combined heat and power units, energy storage systems | GAMS software with CPLEX solver | Microgrid operator’s expected total cost decreases when it participates in the energy market. |
| Córdova et al. [1] | Microgrid operation and frequency regulation | No | No | Virtual battery | Mixed-integer linear programming | Energy management system embedding thermostatically controlled load flexibility can enable significant daily savings in the order of 5–6%. |
| Cui et al. [20] | Investment and operational costs | No | No | Wind turbines, gas turbine, natural gas, data center, electric boiler | Stochastic optimization | Investment, operational, and total costs decreased by 33.2%, 4.5%, and 6.08%, respectively. |
| Dong et al. [18] | Income and operational cost | Yes | No | Wind turbine, photovoltaic, energy storage systems, gas turbine, gas boiler, electric refrigerator, lithium bromide absorption chiller | Mixed-integer linear programming | The model can enhance the income of energy storage operators, lower the energy costs for microgrid users, demonstrate the complementary strengths of various energy sources, and increase the efficiency of energy usage. |
| Fei et al. [30] | Operational cost and emissions | Yes | Yes; only ships | Fuel cells, seawater desalination units, diesel generators | Risk-averse stochastic programming model | The model balances risk and economic performance in the presence of uncertain weather conditions and cold ironing prices. |
| Ghasemi et al. [26] | Operational cost and emissions | Yes | Yes; only EVs | Combined heat and power units, renewable distributed generation, boiler, energy storage, EVs, controllable distributed generation | Epsilon constraints and maximum–minimum fuzzy methods | The total cost of operation has been lowered by over 6%, and the expenses related to environmental pollutants have been cut down by approximately 13%. |
| Jiang et al. [28] | Operational cost | No | Yes; only EVs | Wind turbine, photovoltaic, energy storage, EVs, gas storage | Water wave optimization | Electricity price is correlated with natural gas consumption, suggesting that multi-carrier energy grids need to be optimized and studied together |
| Jin et al. [21] | Operational cost and emissions | A general energy storage model is considered | No | Wind turbine, photovoltaic, energy storage, electrolyzer, micro-turbine, fuel cell, gas station, hydrogen storage | Improved Honey Badger Algorithm | The total cost of the hydrogen microgrid is 16.47% lower than that of a conventional microgrid. |
| Komeili et al. [25] | Profit | Yes | No | Gas-fired micro-turbine, wind turbine, photovoltaic, combined heat and power unit, energy storage system, boiler | Mixed-integer linear programming | Gas-fired micro turbine can significantly contribute to lowering the operational expenses of the microgrid when renewable resources are highly integrated. |
| Li et al. [24] | Operational cost | Yes | No | Anaerobic biomass, fuel cell, electrolyzer, hydro-turbine, irrigation pump, micro-turbine, wind turbine, thermal tank, Sabatier reactor, photovoltaic, electric boiler/chiller | Stochastic mixed-integer quadratic programming | The proposed multi-energy rural microgrids, incorporating biomass energy utilization and irrigation systems, exhibit strong economic performance and adaptability in rural scenarios. |
| Nazari et al. [19] | TES capacity size | Yes | No | Wind turbine, micro-turbine, fuel cell, photovoltaic, energy storage | Not discussed | With thermostatically controlled loads being totally replaced by thermal energy storage, the required lithium-ion battery capacity is decreased by 70% compared to when thermostatically controlled loads are not replaced with thermal energy storage. |
| Yan et al. [29] | Operational cost | Yes | Yes | Absorption chiller, combined heat and power units, energy storage, electric chiller, energy storage systems, electric vehicles, photovoltaics, wind turbine | Crow search optimization | The crow search optimization algorithm demonstrates a 50% enhancement compared to other approaches like particle swarm optimization, highlighting its effectiveness in obtaining optimal solutions for microgrid performance. |
| Zhang et al. [22] | Operational cost, emissions, and data safety | Yes | No | Combined heat and power unit, energy storage systems, heat pump, gas boiler, photovoltaic, gas boiler, wind turbine | Federated deep reinforcement learning | A comprehensive and secure federated learning framework is introduced to manage energy in the constructed multi-energy microgrids of varying scale, where each grid functions as an independent entity and engages in peer-to-peer trading with others to achieve local energy balance. |
| Zheng et al. [23] | Operational cost | Yes | No | Combined heat and power unit, energy storage systems, heat pump, photovoltaic | Soft actor–critic reinforcement learning approach | The suggested storage management approach cuts the average daily operational and maintenance expenses by more than 10% during summer and by more than 20% in winter, respectively. |
| Correia et al. [31] | N/A | No | Yes | Photovoltaic, energy storage, electric vehicles, buildings | N/A, economic model was used for assessment | Compared to traditional insulated-gate bipolar transistor bidirectional chargers, silicon–carbide technology offers higher operating efficiency, which can improve by 10 to 26% depending on the power applied. |
| Ref. | Objective Function | Is Energy Supply Considered? | System Scale | Solution | Served Passengers | Optimization Method | Assets Considered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim [35] | Profit and quality of service | No | 10 vertiports, | Profit of up to 2474, unit is not mentioned | Up to 99% | Heuristic algorithms based on Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm along with a greedy algorithm | up to 40 vehicles and 60 seats per fleet mix |
| Arafat and Moh [36] | Delivery time | No | Up to 25 charging stations for drones | The delivery success ratio can be 1 for fewer than 300 customers. | Up to 500 customers | Clustering and mixed-integer linear programming | Up to 6 drones |
| Huang et al. [37] | Time, distance and charging cost | No | One wireless charging station and one battery exchange station | Vehicle-to-drone charging was used significantly more for emergency orders compared to other charging methods, such as wireless charging stations and battery swap stations. | 1225 emergency delivery orders | Not discussed but SimPy (process-based discrete-event simulation) is used | Drone number is not discussed. |
| Guo et al. [38] | Recovery cost of eVTOL aircraft routes and the cancellation cost of flights | No | Up to 69 vertiports | Up to 45% cost saving | Not discussed | Branch-and-price algorithm | Up to 100 eVTOLs |
| Zou [39] | Cost, safety, and quality of service | No | 10 vertiports | Energy supply–demand imbalance cost of 15.58, unit is not mentioned | Up to 70 passengers | A joint method based on the destination collision-aware matching game and clustering-based MA3DQN with the multi-step bootstrapping approach | 60 eVTOLs |
| Velaz-Acera et al. [41] | N/A | No | Not mentioned | The reduction of CO2 equivalent emissions is up to 50% in the intra-island area compared to conventional means of transport, while for inter-island travel, emissions are reduced by up to 45% | Not mentioned | N/A | Up to 56,800 vehicles |
| Chen [42] | Total travel distance | No | Network size is 41 | By integrating the routing strategy with charging scheduling, total travel time can be reduced | Not mentioned | Mixed-integer linear programming | Up to 10 vehicles |
| Bulusu et al. [43] | Distance | No | 60 vertiports | Up to 25% travel time saved as compared to a car trip | Up to 12,000 | Not discussed | Not discussed |
| Yuan et al. [11] | Energy cost, eVTOL operational cost, safety, quality of service | Yes | 6 vertiports | eVTOLs can utilize inexpensive surplus solar energy | Up to 771 | Hybrid method using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm | Up to 246 eVTOLs |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yuan, Y.; Lai, C.S.; Lai, L.L.; Zhao, Z. A Critical Review of Multi-Energy Microgrids and Urban Air Mobility. Thermo 2026, 6, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo6020032
Yuan Y, Lai CS, Lai LL, Zhao Z. A Critical Review of Multi-Energy Microgrids and Urban Air Mobility. Thermo. 2026; 6(2):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo6020032
Chicago/Turabian StyleYuan, Yujie, Chun Sing Lai, Loi Lei Lai, and Zhuoli Zhao. 2026. "A Critical Review of Multi-Energy Microgrids and Urban Air Mobility" Thermo 6, no. 2: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo6020032
APA StyleYuan, Y., Lai, C. S., Lai, L. L., & Zhao, Z. (2026). A Critical Review of Multi-Energy Microgrids and Urban Air Mobility. Thermo, 6(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo6020032
