Manganese Oxide Carbon-Based Nanocomposite in Energy Storage Applications
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Fairly improved manuscript
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
I would like to thank you for your review of our manuscript, and for the comments. Our reactions to your comments are as follows.
Point 1: Fairly improved manuscript
Response 1: I would like to thank you for your review and comments.
Best regards.
Mulugeta Wayu, Ph.D.
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear Authors,
The overall manuscript quality have been improved, however as for my last request before I can recommend this work for publication is that the Figure 1 and 2 visual quality should be improved. We live in time when the data visualization has improved since late 80s, and there is a lot of attention paid to the way people present their data etc. Therefore, I would like to suggest that you rethink how you would like to improve the visualization of the presented information to be more appealing to the reader and correct it in the manuscript.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
I would like to thank you for your review of our manuscript, and for the comments. Our reactions to your comments are as follows.
Point 1: The overall manuscript quality have been improved, however as for my last request before I can recommend this work for publication is that the Figure 1 and 2 visual quality should be improved. We live in time when the data visualization has improved since late 80s, and there is a lot of attention paid to the way people present their data etc. Therefore, I would like to suggest that you rethink how you would like to improve the visualization of the presented information to be more appealing to the reader and correct it in the manuscript.
Response 1: Thank you for pointing this out. I agree with this comment and suggestions. Therefore, I have edited Figures 1 and 2 and incorporated them into the manuscript (at lines 48 – 51 and 65 – 67) accordingly.
Best regards.
Mulugeta Wayu, Ph.D.
This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This article provides a useful overview of the state of the art in supercapacitor manufacturing. The reader who is familiar with the physics and chemistry of solid carbon will be especially pleased to see the great influence of this material on the properties of hybrid supercapacitors. The article is written in good language, contains a sufficient amount of illustrative materials and can be recommended for publication in the journal in the present form.
Reviewer 2 Report
Dear Authors,
This manuscript presents a review on the Manganese Oxide Carbon-Based Nanocomposite in Energy Storage Applications. Personally I feel that this manuscript is not sufficiently comprehensive in terms of the manganese oxide carbon based materials covered. Due to aforementioned I do not recommend it for publication in Solids Journal in present form.
Reviewer 3 Report
This review summarizes recent progress of manganese oxide and carbon-based nanocomposite for supercapacitive applications. However, critical thinking and perspective have been significantly lacked in the manuscript. As such, this current version cannot meet the publication standard of this journal.
