Heavy Metal Contamination and Ecological Risk Assessment in Soils of the Pawara Gold Mining Area, Eastern Cameroon

: Pawara area is a mining district in the eastern region of Cameroon. Mining in the area is generally artisanal and semi-mechanized, practiced by the local miners and immigrants from neighboring African countries and China. The lack of strict regulations and control of mining activities permits the miners to use illegal substances, especially Hg in gold separation. These expose the area to toxic and heavy metals pollution. This study highlights the source of heavy metals concentration in the Pawara soils and the potential adverse effects of Hg on gold separation to the environment and health. Three mining sites and one control site were investigated, namely Site A, Site B and Site C. The control Site 0 (background) is an area where no mining and agricultural activities have taken place. Soil samples were collected at depth of 20 cm, with six from each site (24 samples). Samples were analyzed for Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Cd and Zn content using atomic absorption spectrophotometry in a graphite furnace. The metals, except for Fe, show high values for all three sites exceeding the background levels in the soils. Hg shows the highest concentration on Site A with a value of 1590 mg kg − 1 . Pb is highest on Site B with a concentration of 12,274 mg kg − 1 . The contamination degree was assessed with the help of contamination indices (Igeo—index of geo-accumulation; PLI—pollution load index; RI—potential ecological risk; Eri—ecological risk; Pi—single pollution index; CF—contamination factor) and all parameters show a high degree of contamination on all three sites compared to the control site. Hg, Pb, Cd, Cr and Cu as single pollutants show the highest ecological risk on Site A and Site B where intense mining is taking place. The absence of industrial and large-scale agricultural activities in the Pawara area, the nonexistence of contaminants on the control site and the presence of contaminants on Site C where farming is high and mining is low jointly show that the discharge of mine wastes onto the soils and stream channels are the main source of contaminants and potential pollutants of the Pawara ecological environment


Introduction
Soils over gold mining terrains are often polluted by heavy metals, which are released from mine tailings [1]. Heavy metals are toxic and pollutants to living organisms and the environment [1]. Gold mining activities are considered to be one of the major causes of heavy metals discharged into the environment [2,3]. Heavy metal accumulation in the terrestrial environment has become a global problem [3][4][5][6][7]. Heavy metal enrichment would inevitably pose threats to humans and ecosystems [4,8,9]. Yet the mining activity constitutes a major source of income for the local population that they cannot do without. However, the adoption of dangerous techniques during the exploitation of gold such as Hg may become a major environmental and health issue. Several countries and authors have looked into the exploitation of gold and its environmental consequences. The fact Figure 1. Geological sketch of the Lom series presenting the study area and the monocyclic unit associated with the grabbens (modified from [24]). (1) Orthogneiss; (2) Lom volcaniclastic series; (3) polygenic conglomerates; (4) Mari quartzites; (5) staurolite micashists; (6) sillimanite gneiss from the Lom bridge; (7) chloritoid and staurolite mylonites. Intrusions with an uncertain structural relationship; (8) granites; (9) granites and monzonites; (10) metalamprophyres.

Sample Collection and Preparation
Soil sampling was carried out in November 2020 during the dry season. At each selected site, the area was divided into grid cells of 100 × 100 m for sampling and regularly spaced around. Four sample sites were selected and labeled Site 0, Site A, Site B and Site C ( Figure 2). The Pawara area generally has a thick soil profile with a scarcity of rock outcrops. However, the lithology is made up of metavolcanic-metasedimentary rocks deeply buried. The duricrust layer is exposed in most parts of the study area. Sampling was undertaken in areas with no duricrust or laterite cover. The samples were collected within the topsoil. This soil is sandy-clay and shows reddish-brown color. On each site, six soil samples of 500 g were collected at a depth of 20 cm, making a total of 24 soil samples. The distance between sample sites was set at 4 km between Site A and Site B, and 24

Sample Collection and Preparation
Soil sampling was carried out in November 2020 during the dry season. At each selected site, the area was divided into grid cells of 100 × 100 m for sampling and regularly spaced around. Four sample sites were selected and labeled Site 0, Site A, Site B and Site C ( Figure 2). The Pawara area generally has a thick soil profile with a scarcity of rock outcrops. However, the lithology is made up of metavolcanic-metasedimentary rocks deeply buried. The duricrust layer is exposed in most parts of the study area. Sampling was undertaken in areas with no duricrust or laterite cover. The samples were collected within the topsoil. This soil is sandy-clay and shows reddish-brown color. On each site, six soil samples of 500 g were collected at a depth of 20 cm, making a total of 24 soil samples. The distance between sample sites was set at 4 km between Site A and Site B, and 24 km between Site B and Site C. The distance from the control site (Site 0) to Site A was set at 6.5 km, and 2 km from where mining activities are operating. Site C is located in the farmlands, at least 1 km from where mine tailings are deposited ( Figure 2).
Site B is considered the main site where major mining operations take place. Here, mining is completed by the Chinese using heavy machinery such as caterpillars digging the ground to depths of several tens of meters to reach the saprolite layer. Shale formations occur here and that is where the local artisanal miners operate. Generally, the abandoned mines in this area are not rehabilitated. No agricultural activity is carried out in the area because the holes and trenches left by the Chinese miners present risks for farmers and even breeders. These sites were generally abandoned to small mining artisans after the departure of the mechanical machinery, and the holes left are filled with polluted acid mine drainage with sulphides.
Site C is the most stable because it has not yet been exploited. It is also a place where agricultural activities are intense. However, the crops cultivated in this area used stream water that flows through Site A and Site B where mining is intense.

Sample Analysis
For each site, the six sub-samples were homogenized and a representative sample was obtained for analysis. At the Laboratory of Soils and Environmental Chemistry of the Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Cameroon, soil samples were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) and atomization was completed using a graphite furnace. Here, 500 g of each sample was air-dried, mixed, Site 0 (control site) is the reference test site. It is located far from the area where mining activities operate. The samples consist of undisturbed soil that has never been influenced by gold activities and is far from human activities in the Pawara area. It is located about 1.5 km from the gold mining sites and 10 km from the village center.
Site A is located on the exploited site on the hillside. Here, agricultural activities have resumed about 10 years after the mining site was abandoned. Mining activities started on the hill and gradually moved to the lowland area. Each abandoned site becomes a dumping ground for the active site all along the watercourse. During mining operations, the mine tailings are deposited on slopes of Site A after, while washing is completed on-site. Agricultural activities are undertaken locally on this site.
Site B is considered the main site where major mining operations take place. Here, mining is completed by the Chinese using heavy machinery such as caterpillars digging the ground to depths of several tens of meters to reach the saprolite layer. Shale formations occur here and that is where the local artisanal miners operate. Generally, the abandoned mines in this area are not rehabilitated. No agricultural activity is carried out in the area because the holes and trenches left by the Chinese miners present risks for farmers and even breeders. These sites were generally abandoned to small mining artisans after the departure of the mechanical machinery, and the holes left are filled with polluted acid mine drainage with sulphides.
Site C is the most stable because it has not yet been exploited. It is also a place where agricultural activities are intense. However, the crops cultivated in this area used stream water that flows through Site A and Site B where mining is intense.

Sample Analysis
For each site, the six sub-samples were homogenized and a representative sample was obtained for analysis. At the Laboratory of Soils and Environmental Chemistry of the Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Cameroon, soil Earth 2022, 3 911 samples were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) and atomization was completed using a graphite furnace. Here, 500 g of each sample was air-dried, mixed, ground and sieved to obtain a 2 mm mesh fraction. Soil samples were further oven dried at 40 • C for 35 min. Then, 1 g of each dried sample was digested in aqua-regia following the French NF x31 415 ISO 11466 standard procedure as described in [30,31]. Here, each sample was placed in a 250 mL beaker and a 25 mL solution of aqua regia was added in a volume ratio of 4:1 of HCl: HNO 3 , respectively. The mixture was allowed to digest for 5 h at 50 • C. The solution was then filtered and diluted using nonionized water to obtain a 50 mL volume in a 50 mL volumetric flask. The extracts were then analyzed for the concentrations of Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Hg, Mn, Al and Fe using the AAS technique. The pH of the soil samples was measured from liquid suspension derived from mixing 10 g each of soil sample was dissolved in 20 mL of doubly distilled water and mixed using a magnetic stirrer at 25 • C. The pH was measured using a pH meter after leaving the mixture to stand for 2 h in an air-protected room.

Estimation of Contamination Indices
Apart from the sample collection, other criteria were used to determent the concentration of contaminants and indices of contamination such as the geo-accumulation index (Igeo), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), ecological risk (Ei) and potential ecological risk intensity (RI) were calculated.

Index of Geo-Accumulation of Heavy Metals
This parameter determines the contamination level in soils by comparing metal content in topsoil with a referenced chemical background in undisturbed soils. The Igeo was calculated using the originally proposed formula by [1] to assess the degree of heavy metal contamination in the soils: where Cn stands for the measured concentration of heavy metals in the soil sample; GB is the geochemical background value in soil from the control site. The background geochemical compositions of the non-cultivated soil were selected as the background values in calculating the Igeo values. A correction factor of 1.5 was used to minimize possible variations resulting from lithogenic effects. The estimated Igeo values were classified into seven classes: Igeo < 0 for unpolluted; Igeo = 0-1 for unpolluted to moderately polluted; Igeo = 1-2 for moderately polluted; Igeo = 2-3 for moderately to strongly polluted; Igeo = 3-4 for strongly polluted; Igeo = 4-5 for strongly to extremely polluted; and Igeo > 5 for extremely polluted [1,[32][33][34][35].

Contamination Factor (CF)
Contamination factor (CF) is an index that was first used by [36] to determine soil contamination. It is the ratio obtained by dividing the content of each metal in the soil by the background value to assess the soil contamination.
CF is calculated using the following Equation: where C stands for metal concentration.
Pollution Load Index (PLI) Ref. [35] indicated that the pollution load index (PLI) evaluates the level of heavy metal pollution in soils. This parameter is calculated using the following Equation: where n is the number of metals and CF is the heavy metal concentration factor in the soil/background value of the metal. The interpretation is presented as PLI > 1 for polluted, whereas PLI < 1 indicates no pollution.
Ecological Risk Factor (Eri) An ecological risk factor (Eri) was proposed by [36] to evaluate the toxic risk of individual heavy metal in water, air and in soil. The Eri is calculated following Equation: where Ti is the metal toxic response factor for an individual substance. According to the standardized toxic response factor [36][37][38][39][40], the Ti values are as follows: T Cu = 5, T Pb = 5, T Zn = 1, T Cd =10, T Hg = 40, and T Cr = 2.
CFi is the contamination factor of individual heavy metal. The following terminologies are used to describe the risk factor: Eri < 40, low potential ecological risk; 40 ≤ Eri < 80, moderate potential ecological risk; 80 ≤ Eri < 160, considerable potential ecological risk; 160 ≤ Eri < 320, high potential ecological risk; Eri ≥ 320, very high ecological risk.
Although the risk factor was initially used as a diagnostic tool to control water pollution, it was successfully used for assessing the quality of sediments and soils in the environment from contamination by heavy metals [36][37][38][39][40].

Potential Ecological Risk (RI)
The potential ecological risk index is a comprehensive method linking all heavy metals with their toxicological effects. It is calculated based on three indices: a single index of ecological risk factor (Eri), the pollution coefficient of a single element (Cn), and the toxic response factor of individual metals (Ti). RI evaluates the ecological risks caused by heavy metals [41,42].
RI is a comprehensive method linking all heavy metals with their toxicological effects. It was calculated using the above-mentioned equation, where the RI may be classified based on their intensities on a scale ranging from 150 to 600: moderate degree (150 ≤ RI < 300), high degree (300 ≤ RI < 600), and very high degree (RI ≥ 600).

Enrichment Factor of Heavy Metals
The enrichment factor (EF) analysis and index of geo-accumulation were used to determine the contribution and contamination status of heavy metals in the study area. The EF provides information on the possible anthropogenic and natural contamination caused by heavy metals in the soil. EF was determined as the concentration ratio of an examined metal to a reference metal in each sample, divided by the concentration ratio of their background values. The EF analysis was computed as follows: where C n is the concentration of the metal (n) in the sample and Cie is the concentration of the immobile element (ie) in sample. Thus, EF is the ratio of Cn/Cie sample to that in the background sample (pre-industrial area [43]). To conduct the EF analysis, the choice of reference element is very important because such an element must have a relatively high Earth 2022, 3 913 concentration, low occurrence variability and chemical stability in the crust [44]. Some commonly used reference elements are Al, Fe, Sc, Mn and Ti [45,46].

Single Pollution Index (Pi)
The Pi quantifies the heavy metal concentrations in the soil with regards to pollution from one single heavy metal. It was defined as the ratio between Cn and Cref : where Cn identifies the concentration of heavy metals in each sample and GB refers to the soil background standard of each heavy metal. The pollution index classifies the quality of soil environment into five domains:

Soil Chemical Characterization
The results of the analyzed soil samples collected from Sites A, B and C show significant enrichment in the trace metals concentration compared to the undisturbed Site 0 ( Table 1). All samples show metal concentrations above the reference and background values except for Zn at Site C ( Figure 3). However, the soil pH generally shows acidity, with values ranging from 5.3 to 6.1. Pb has the highest concentration on Site B where mining is undertaken using the big machinery with 12,274 mg kg −1 , but its concentration is substantially equal at Sites A and C where intense artisanal mining operates. On the other hand, Hg is highest at Site A with a concentration of 1590 mg kg −1 , while the lowest concentration is observed at Site B, with a value of 15.21 mg kg −1 . Zn, Cr and Cu have their lowest concentrations at Site B, with values of 10.39 mg kg −1 , 171 mg kg −1 and 33.03 pm, respectively. Zn behaves similar to Hg except that the concentration of Hg is higher at Site A than at the other sites. The control Site 0 shows a very low Hg level in the soil below the reference level ( Figure 3). Meanwhile, copper presents a high concentration at Site C, but the concentration is relatively low at Site B. The lowest concentration of Cd with the value of 9.09 mg kg −1 is observed at Site C. Fe has a high concentration at Site A, moderate at Site C, and low at Site B. For Al, a higher concentration is observed at Site B, and a substantially equal quantity at Sites C and B. Compared to the world reference values for metals in the soils (Table 1), the undisturbed site (Site 0) shows elevated values for Pb, Zn and Cr.

Estimation of Contamination Indices
The results show moderate to high contamination of the investigated trace elements in soils within the Pawara gold mining site. Site B appears to be the least contaminated except for Hg, Pb and Cd with Igeo >1 (Table 2). However, Zn in this site is rather depleted with a negative Igeo. Sites A and C are the most polluted, with Igeo values > 1 for Cu, Fe, Cd and Cr. Hg and Pb from these two sites show the highest degree of contamination, with Igeo for Hg varying from 3.54 to 4.33 and Pb from 2.22 to 2.26.

Geo-Accumulation Index (Igeo)
The results show moderate to high contamination of the investigated trace elements in soils within the Pawara gold mining site. Site B appears to be the least contaminated except for Hg, Pb and Cd with Igeo >1 (Table 2). However, Zn in this site is rather depleted with a negative Igeo. Sites A and C are the most polluted, with Igeo values > 1 for Cu, Fe, Cd and Cr. Hg and Pb from these two sites show the highest degree of contamination, with Igeo for Hg varying from 3.54 to 4.33 and Pb from 2.22 to 2.26. the calculated potential ecological index confirms the high risk of Hg, Cd and Pb pollution in the Pawara area in all three sites (Table 3). Table 3. Variation in contamination factor (CF) and ecological risk factor (Eri) in soils from mining sites within the Pawara area. The EF for the metals was calculated using Al due to its relatively low variability. The metals show values above the natural background of 1.5 in all sites except for Cu, Zn and Cd. EF values at Site A are high for Hg, Pb and Cr. Sites B and C display low EF values for Hg relative to Site A. Pb is distinctively higher at Site B (Table 4). Comparing the Ef and Igeo values, the study area shows very low Igeo in Zn and a corresponding low EF. Site A shows very low Igeo except for Hg and Pb but with moderate to high EF ( Figure 4). Pb stands out with the highest EF in all three sites. EF of Cr is high at all sites but with very low Igeo similar to Cd.

Metal
From the calculated Pi of the trace metals, there is a general indication of pollution in all the sites for all the analyzed elements. However, there is an exception for Zn that shows slight and no pollution at Sites C and B, respectively. For Site A, Zn shows significant pollution with Pi value of 5.35 (Table 4). Pb shows a very high concentration in Site B. Fe behaves similar to Zn, with high risk at Site A, average at Site C and low at Site B. On the other hand, Al shows a high concentration at Site B, an average and substantially equal level of pollution at Sites A and C. Meanwhile, Cd and Cr present high pollution at Site A relative to the other mining sites.  (Table 3).

Enrichment Factor (EF) and Single Pollution Index (PI)
The EF for the metals was calculated using Al due to its relatively low variability. The metals show values above the natural background of 1.5 in all sites except for Cu, Zn and Cd. EF values at Site A are high for Hg, Pb and Cr. Sites B and C display low EF values for Hg relative to Site A. Pb is distinctively higher at Site B (Table 4). Comparing the Ef and Igeo values, the study area shows very low Igeo in Zn and a corresponding low EF. Site A shows very low Igeo except for Hg and Pb but with moderate to high EF (Figure 4). Pb stands out with the highest EF in all three sites. EF of Cr is high at all sites but with very low Igeo similar to Cd.

Heavy Metal Concentration in the Pawara Soils
According to the results of the soil characterization, it appears that Cu and Fe pose no major problem at the three sites although they have slightly high concentrations at Sites A and C and low levels at Site B. Given the configuration of the studied sites, the concentration of Cu in Sites A and C is caused by leaching from abandoned mine tailings into the soils. This is to say that Cu, Fe, Cr, Cd and Al were brought to the environment by weathering the source rock and leaching from the mine tailings, unlike Hg, which is typically anthropogenic [51,52]. From these findings, it is clear that Pb and Cr concentrations from the mining sites in the Pawara area are much higher than observed in other mining sites around the world (Tables 5 and 6). Reports show that in most cases of environmental studies, increased concentrations of heavy metals such as Zn, Cu, Pb and Cr in the soils are linked to anthropogenic activities such as agriculture, coal mining, industrial sewage, crude oil combustion and car exhaust [53][54][55][56][57]. In the Pawara area, the high EF values for Pb in the three mining sites (Figure 4) show anthropogenic influence through soil ploughing and excavation by farmers and miners. These activities increase soil porosity and enhance the mobility of Pb and Cr in the soils. Hg shows a distinctively high EF at site A where it is used in gold separation ( Figure 4). All values closer to 1 indicate natural sources with little or no human influence. There is a significant correlation between the Igeo and the EF for Zn at Sites B and C indicating no contamination and human influence.
The actual situation within and around the Pawara area shows that mining and peasant agriculture are the main activities carried out in this area. However, Pawara is a local community with no industrial activities or large-scale agriculture productivity involved. Therefore, the main culprit for accumulating Cu, Cr, Pb, Cd and Hg in the Pawara area is mining. This explains why the results show lower concentrations in the control sites (Site 0; Table 2) where mining is not operating. This could only mean that the heavy metal enrichment came from mine waste through the process of weathering and leaching. According to [16], mine residue can contain significantly high concentrations of toxic and heavy metals if the ores were not properly extracted from the waste. Previous studies have shown that heavy metal availability in the soils directly relates to soil pH and the redox state of the environment. In most oxidized environments, there is an increase in acidity, which promotes the accumulation of heavy metals in the soil [53,58]. The investigated sites show oxidizing environments, with pH values ranging from 5.3 to 6.1. Such conditions are suitable for solubility and mobility of metals in the soil, especially Pb, Cr, Cd and Hg [59][60][61][62]. It should be noted that the Pawara area has a savanna climate with two seasons. The dry season starts from November to March followed by a long raining season with heavy tropical rain that lasts for over seven months. Such climatic conditions can significantly influence the weathering of rocks and mine tailings, leading to the release of these metals into the soils and their availability for plant absorption [61].
The calculations carried out for the estimation of the contamination factors of the Pawara soils for metals such as Hg, Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn and Cd show significant enrichment of all the elements in comparison with reference data around the world [63][64][65][66][67]. All the calculated parameters (Igeo, Ef, CF, PLI, Eri and Pi) prove that the artisanal exploitation of gold (Au) in the Pawara area has released many contaminants into the environment that has rendered the soils polluted. Amongst the heavy metals identified, Hg, Pb and Cu show the highest prevalence in all three sites and are strongly related to the mining activities in the area. Site B shows the highest Pb concentration probably due to the use of big machinery in mining operations leading to a deeper and larger excavation of the soil right to the bedrock; thus, exposing a larger waste material for weathering and leaching to take place. The authors of [62] indicated that areas around abandoned mines commonly show a high pollution index. In the Pawara area, the pollution load index values are exceptionally higher. This increase may have been enhanced by the immediate takeover of agricultural activities within the area where more Pb is being added from irrigation water and agricultural chemicals.
The impacts of the use of Hg are not to be demonstrated. However, it is worth mentioning that the use of Hg in Cameroon by small artisanal miners and large mining operators is justified by the ease of recovering gold without the risk of suffering enormous economic losses. However, several studies have mentioned the harmful impact of Hg in gold panning sites. It is clear from this study that mining activity is the unique source of the high Hg in the soils. This can be justified by the high Hg EF observed at Site A and very low at the control site ( Figure 4) derived from gold separation. However, the stability of Hg in the soil environment is pH and redox potential dependent [61]. At soil pH > 4 observed in the study area, the system becomes weakly acidic and may cause the inorganic Hg to reduce to the elemental form that easily converts to the most toxic alkylated form [61]. However, the more stable Hg 2+ , Hg 2 2+ and Hg 2 S forms may also occur at this pH [68]. The situation in the Pawara area shows that mining activities are taking place at Sites A and B that highly involves the use of Hg in gold separation. However, Site C and the inhabitants within are equally vulnerable to these contaminants, given that the site is the outlet of the watershed in the area, with the mine tailings after separation. This gives room for more leaching and redistribution of the metals in the surrounding environments; thus, increasing Hg-Pb-Cu-Cd-Cr levels in the soils at Site C (Table 2). Farm ploughing and irrigation may have contributed to redistribution of the different contaminants leached from the mine tailings into the surrounding soils.

Petrogenetic Significance
It is widely understood that soil excavation during mining enhances weathering of the mine tailings leading to the release of heavy and toxic metals into the surface environment. Weathering and leaching of heavy metal can lead to acid mine drainage. However, understanding the origin of the mineralized rocks and their evolution is the key to determining the source and cause of heavy metal concentrations in the soils. Even though their mobility and distribution may be caused by other factors such as mining and weathering activities. The Pawara gold area is a neighboring area to the Betaré-Oya gold district in eastern Cameroon. Reports from [27,69] show that gold mineralization in this region is controlled by shear and fault structures. Pawara and the other gold districts in this region of Cameroon are structurally linked to the Central Cameroon Shear Zone (CCSZ). This shear zone [18,70] forms an integral part of Pan-African orogeny in the country and the AYD in particular. It is indicated that tectonic deformation in this region occurs in four phases denoted D 1 -D 4 [25]. Several reports show that gold mineralization in this region was associated with D 3 dextral shearing controlled by NNE-SSW and NE-SW gently dipping structures.  Refs. [69,70,[80][81][82][83], which were crosscut by D 4 brittle structures. Thus, splays of shear and fault zones [80] crosscut the host rocks, creating fluid paths for hydrothermal activities and subsequently mechanical and chemical weathering [27,84]. The composition of fluids involved in hydrothermal alteration gives a direct indication of the type of metals associated with gold mineralization. According to [27], gold mineralization in this zone occurred in two stages: The first was associated with different ore minerals including sphalerite, galena, pyrite, chalcopyrite, wolframite and hematite, while the second phase contained mainly galena and pyrite with minor greenockite. Galena is the main ore mineral for Pb, sphalerite for Zn and Cd and chalcopyrite for Cu and Fe. These mineral assemblages alongside quartz are often precipitated by hydrothermal fluids within faults, fracture and foliation planes to form veins, lodes and pegmatites during gold mineralization as observed in the Betaré-Oya and Batouri gold districts [27,81,83,85]. Weathering of these minerals eventually releases Zn, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn and Pb into the environment especially when exposed to mine tailing, thereby accounting for their high levels in the soils. The high concentration of Pb recorded at the mining sites, with values ranging from 4200 to 12,274 mg kg −1 can be explained by the high amount of galena involved in gold mineralization, especially during the second phase of hydrothermal activities in the region [27]. Pb also shows very high EF at all test sites indicating significant anthropogenic influence. Unlike Hg, which is directly supplied to the environment by miners, the concentration of Pb, Cr and Cd are indirectly influenced by mining (Figure 4). This is because the mine tailings rich in PbS (galena) are increasingly dumped on the soils promoting weathering and leaching of these metals into the soil. Meanwhile, supergene enrichment processes also contributed to high Cu and Fe Earth 2022, 3 919 concentrations in the form of enargite, goethite and covellite [27], while Pb, Cu and Zn occur in associated wall rock enriched during alteration [86]. In general, the hydrothermal fluid responsible for mineralization in this region originated from Fe and sulfide-bearing granitic sources [85,86].
Ref. [87] indicated that the mobility of Cr, Cu and Mn in the weathering environment is highly dependent on the redox condition. At increasing acidity, these metals become more mobile. Pawara soils show pH values ranging from 5.3 to 6.1 which indicates increased oxidation involving sulfide and Fe 2+ -bearing minerals. This pH range is also suitable for illite formation as an Al, Mg and Fe-bearing phyllosilicate clay mineral [88]. Moreover, Hg absorption into the soil is also enhanced by the presence of these clay minerals [89]. Studies from [90] indicated that trace elements such as Cr, Co, Cu, Fe, Mg, V and Ni turn to be trapped within the duricrust layer along the soil profile even though they are normally mobile in the weathering environment. This accumulation is caused by hot humid climatic conditions as is the case within the Pawara area that favors the oxidation of Fe-and Albearing minerals. Moreover, mining activities turn to shatter and dispose of piles of these materials as mine tailings thereby enhancing the leaching and release of these metals into the soils and water environments.
Under normal circumstances, the supply of Cr in the weathering environment is typically geogenic through weathering of mafic and ultramafic rocks. However, the release of the metal in the soil profiles is directly linked to redox conditions in the weathering environment [87]. Moreover, the basement rocks of this gold district consist of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of mafic to felsic composition. This basement forms part of the AYD of the central African Fold Belt derived from the continent-continent collision between the northern Cameroon block and the Congo craton from the south [18]. Remnants of mafic Paleoproterozoic rock with Archean heritage [91,92] and Neoproterozoic meta-sedimentary rocks were recycled during this event in amphibolite to granulites metamorphic facies [93]. Orthoderived Archean (2.9-2.5 Ga) cratonic fragment of tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) composition forms part of this basement [22] that were further intruded by Pan-African granitoids, with emplacement age between 640 and 620 Ma in the eastern region [85]. This event leads to the melting of Archean mafic rocks from the cratonic block and the emplacement of granitoids within the AYD and western Cameroon Domain (WCD). These mafic rocks bear Cr-rich minerals and based on [94], Cr concentration increases significantly in soils derived from weathering of mafic rocks when compared to that in the fresh mafic formation. The release of Cr 4+ into soils, however, was probably enhanced by increasing oxidizing conditions and a suitable soil pH within the acidic medium [87]. Therefore, the composition of the lithologies hosting gold in the Pawara area is the main source of these metals in the soils except for Hg. However, mining and related anthropogenic activities promote weathering and leaching thereby rendering the mobility of heavy metals leading to contamination and pollution of the surface and subsurface environments, e.g., [95][96][97].
This study has effectively determined the contamination level of heavy and toxic metals in the Pawara soils using some of the renowned indicators such as Igeo and EF, e.g., [98][99][100]. Nevertheless, their concentration levels may not necessarily indicate pollution. Consequently, the immediate takeover of the mining sites by farmers for agriculture may cause serious health issues to the inhabitants of the area: thus, based on previous reports, the toxicity assessment and associated health risk is of paramount importance [101,102].

Conclusions
This work shows that Pawara soil is facing a high risk of heavy metals contamination due to the high concentration of contaminants in the soil added to the country's fast and extensive development of gold artisanal mining. These contaminants have been assessed at the individual scale using Igeo where Hg, Pb and Cd indicate potential pollutants in the soils. At a large pollution scale, Site C shows the highest pollution load index due to the intense agricultural activities operating on the mine tailings. Meanwhile, the natural sources are highly responsible for the concentration of these metals in the Pawara soils except for Hg. The illegal and uncontrolled use of Hg in artisanal mining in this area constitutes a major source of pollution, with significantly high Hg in the soils (15 ≤ Hg ≥ 1591 mg kg −1 ) above the reference levels. The results also show considerable enrichment of Pb, Cd, Zn and Cr within the mining sites relative to the undisturbed area. The EF values show a significant influence of anthropogenic activities on the supply of Hg, Pb and Cr in the soils at the investigated site. However, aside from Hg with a direct anthropogenic input during gold separation, the EF of Pb and Cr have been enhanced through ploughing and soil excavation by miners and farmers. The composition of the magmatic fluid and weathering of ore minerals associated with Au in the host rocks supplied these metals naturally in the soils. The soil contamination indices generally show values above tolerance levels. The acidic pH (5.3-6.1) provides an ideal environment for the solubility and uptake of these metals in the soil and plants. Although mining activities are not operating at Site C, the high levels of contaminants observed in the soils are supplied through runoffs and plant irrigation.
Taking into account that this was a baseline study, the contamination indicators used were able to determine the rate of heavy metals contamination in the soils and potential pollutants in the area. However, the accurate evaluation of environmental risk was not possible considering that the analysis did not allow us to determine the metal speciation. Thus, subsequent studies in the area should take into consideration this aspect together with the bioavailability and toxicity of metals in order to determine pollution hazard.