A Survey on Federated Learning and Edge Computing: Applications, Advantages, and Challenges †
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Historical Development
2.1. Edge Computing
2.2. Federated Learning
3. Applications
3.1. Edge Computing
- Traffic management: Edge devices analyze real-time data from road sensors, cameras and connected vehicles to optimize traffic flow, manage congestion, and adjust traffic signals dynamically. This enables rapid response to incidents, reduces travel times and improves road safety [3].
- Public safety and surveillance: Videos from city cameras are processed locally at the edge to detect anomalies such as accidents or suspicious activity, enabling quick alerts and responses while reducing bandwidth and central server workloads. Privacy is also better protected since raw video data does not always leave the local network [3].
- Environmental monitoring: This involves installing sensors throughout the city to gather data on various environmental factors. These sensors track air quality, noise levels, weather conditions, and water quality. Edge computing enables quick analysis and alerts in case of pollution spikes or dangerous conditions, supporting public health efforts.
- Predictive maintenance: Edge devices constantly monitor machinery via vibration, temperature, and other sensors, to detect patterns indicating potential failures. They can predict maintenance needs, schedule repairs before breakdowns, and reduce costly unplanned downtime [1].
- Real-time quality control: Vision systems and smart sensors at the edge inspect products as they move along the production line, instantly identifying defects or irregularities. This allows for immediate correction, reduces waste, and maintains high product quality [11].
- Process automation and optimization: Edge computing supports autonomous decision-making on the spot. Systems can quickly adapt to changing conditions, optimize resource use, and control robotics or automation equipment with minimal delay, improving speed and flexibility in manufacturing operations.
- Real-time perception and decision-making: Edge processors in vehicles combine data from cameras, radars and ultrasonic sensors to accurately interpret the vehicle’s immediate surroundings. This allows rapid identification of obstacles, pedestrians, road signs and lane markings, tasks that demand immediate response and cannot tolerate cloud latency [2].
- Vehicle to everything (V2X) communications: Edge computing powers low-latency communications between vehicles (V2V), infrastructure (V2I), and pedestrians (V2P). This supports applications like cooperative collision avoidance, traffic flow optimization, and hazard warnings.
- Predictive maintenance: Edge devices monitor the status of vehicle components in real time, detecting anomalies and predicting part failures. Maintenance can then be scheduled proactively, reducing breakdowns while improving safety and reliability.
- Remote patient monitoring and wearables: Edge devices allow continuous and real-time data analysis. They analyze physiological data from wearables like the heart rate, ECG and blood glucose monitors in real time, detecting anomalies such as arrhythmia or sudden drops in vital signs and sending timely alerts to caregivers or health professionals [18].
- Medical imaging and diagnostics: Hospitals and clinics can collaboratively train AI diagnostic models (e.g., for pneumonia or tumor detection using X-rays and MRIs) using federated learning at the edge. This approach preserves patient privacy and meets regulatory requirements by keeping sensitive data local [2,19,20,21].
- Smart hospitals and clinical workflow automation: Edge platforms track medical equipment, monitor occupancy, and regulate building automation like heating/cooling or lighting for energy efficiency and infection control [13].
- Edge computing lets smart grids collect and process data from smart meters, sensors, and distributed energy resources instantly at the edge, not just in the central cloud. This enables immediate detection of power outages, equipment failures, or grid fluctuations, so operators can react in real time, keeping the energy system reliable [3].
- Edge servers collect and manage inputs from solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles, and batteries at the grid’s edge. They coordinate resource usage and sync with the central network for optimal performance [3].
- Edge nodes analyze consumption patterns and can adjust loads dynamically, making it easier to schedule heavy-demand devices or electric vehicle charging when the grid is less busy. This supports demand response and smart pricing models, helping users and utilities save energy and money.
- Edge computing powers real-time data collection and analytics from field sensors and IoT devices, helping farmers monitor soil conditions, moisture, weather, crop growth, and equipment status right at the field edge. Sensor data is processed locally for instant decisions like when to irrigate, fertilize, or spray pesticides without waiting for cloud responses, which means faster reactions and more efficient resource use. This leads to higher crop yields, water savings, and reduced environmental impact since inputs can be fine-tuned down to specific plants or zones [22].
- Edge servers collect and analyze temperature, humidity, light, pH, and other environmental data in greenhouses, automatically controlling lighting, heating, ventilation, and watering. Local control at the edge helps maintain ideal growing conditions at all times, even if the internet connection drops, and can issue alerts or fix problems immediately. This improves crop quality, stabilizes yield, and saves resources by reducing unnecessary adjustments [3].
- Edge-enabled wearable sensors monitor animal health, activity, and environment (like temperatures for calving cows or herd movements), then deliver instant alerts or health assessments to farmers’ mobile devices. This ensures timely interventions for animal health issues, reduces risk of disease spread, and improves farming outcomes by monitoring pregnancies or stress in real time [9].
- Edge computing allows shelves fitted with sensors and cameras to monitor product levels, detect when items are misplaced, and update inventory in real time. The analysis happens at the edge, so alerts or restocking requests are instant, even during network slowdowns. This reduces out-of-stock incidents, shrinks inventory loss, and saves staff time by automating manual checks [23].
- Edge servers analyze data from in-store sensors, loyalty apps, and cameras to provide real-time, personalized promotions like digital displays that greet returning customers or suggest relevant products as they walk by. Moreover, edge devices can process customer preferences and purchase history locally to provide personalized recommendations and offers in real time. Digital signage systems powered by edge computing can display targeted advertisements based on customer demographics detected through computer vision [2].
- Edge AI systems monitor shopper movement at checkout lanes using cameras and sensors, predicting waiting times and automatically opening or closing registers to minimize lines or redirecting customers to shorter lines. Touchless self-checkout can also use edge processing for fast payment and fraud detection [23].
- Edge computing enhances surveillance by allowing real-time video analysis directly at the camera level. Smart cameras with edge processing capabilities can handle object detection, facial recognition, and behavioral analysis locally, eliminating the need to send raw video streams to a central server [3].
- Edge computing enables intelligent traffic management systems that enhance public safety through real-time traffic flow optimization and incident detection [2].
- Edge AI at gates, building entrances, or even at airports can perform facial recognition or badge validation, authorize or deny entry within milliseconds, and trigger lockdowns or alerts if an unauthorized person is detected, while keeping sensitive biometric data local [13].
3.2. Federated Learning
- Predictive Modeling for Disease Risk and Outcomes: Federated learning is used by hospitals and research centers to collaboratively train models that predict patient outcomes like the risk of hospital readmission, disease onset (e.g., heart disease), or mortality without pooling sensitive electronic health records into a central database [27].
- Patient Similarity Search and Representation Learning: Federated learning allows computation of privacy-preserving hash codes or embeddings to find similar patients for research or treatment planning across multiple hospitals without ever exposing individual-level data [9].
- Smart Home Devices and Personalization: Smart speakers, home assistants, and IoT-enabled appliances learn user preferences for voice commands, schedule automation, and behavioral routines locally, only sharing model updates, not raw audio or sensor data, with cloud or edge servers [11].
- Industrial IoT and Predictive Maintenance: Federated learning unlocks high-value collaborative analytics across industrial devices and factories, enabling actionable insights while keeping proprietary data secure. Sensors on industrial equipment, remote assets, and operational infrastructure use federated schemes to collaboratively train models for predictive maintenance, ensuring each plant or site retains sensitive operational logs [7].
- Anomaly Detection and Intrusion Detection: Federated learning is used in IoT to collaboratively detect threats like cyberattacks or device tampering based on distributed patterns seen across the network. Each device contributes local alerts or patterns, but does not leak user specifics, improving safety and resilience [30].
- Fraud Detection and Prevention: Multiple institutions collaboratively detect and block fraudulent patterns that span several organizations, like money laundering rings and coordinated digital payment attacks, without revealing sensitive client records. When institutions share only model improvements, they are less likely to miss sophisticated fraud that crosses traditional boundaries [9].
- Credit Scoring and Lending Risk: Federated learning enables more accurate and fair credit scoring by combining knowledge from different banks, fintechs, or credit unions, even if their customers never overlap. This approach reduces bias for underbanked groups and creates much richer scoring models [7].
- Open Banking, Personalization, and Secure Data Collaboration: Open banking is all about sharing account access and analytics with third parties. Federated learning makes it safer by letting banks, fintech apps, and aggregators build better recommendation engines, budgeting tools, and credit risk models while never revealing raw transactions [31].
- Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Regulatory Compliance: Banks and regulators use federated learning to work together, spotting patterns in money movement that indicate money laundering or terrorism financing, all while ensuring regulatory requirements for privacy and data residency are honored [30].
- Insurance Underwriting and Claims Analytics: Federated learning gives insurers a way to train risk models on claims, accident, and customer data from across the industry—making the prediction of claim likelihood or fraud much more robust.
- Network Resource Allocation and Optimization: Federated learning is used to distribute decision-making for network resource allocation, bandwidth scheduling, and congestion control across nodes or base stations without sharing sensitive or proprietary data [32]. Across 5G/6G, edge, and IoT networks, local nodes can train models on metrics like latency, throughput, energy, or user load and participate in global scheduling via the federated approach [30].
- Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) and Vehicular Networks: In vehicular and industrial IoT, federated learning models are trained to predict queueing delays or schedule wireless channels, improving reliability and latency without central coordination [22].
- Smart Caching and Content Delivery: Federated models are used to predict content popularity and manage proactive edge caching in telecoms, allowing for recommendations without network-wide data aggregation [30].
- Keyboard Prediction and Query Suggestions: Federated learning enables real-time improvement of keyboard models like autocorrect, next-word prediction, and query suggestions, without sending raw keystrokes or messages to a central server. For example, on Google Gboard, smartphones process local data such as typed text sequences and only share encrypted model updates with a central server [11].
- Speech Recognition and Keyword Spotting: Federated learning lets smart devices continually refine speech recognition or keyword spotting models on the device itself. Instead of uploading actual voice recordings, which might include names or sensitive info, devices process their data locally, then send only model weights or gradients [9].
- Sentiment Analysis, Translation, and Multilingual NLP: Federated learning is important in organizations like banks, hospitals and global tech firms that have massive, private chat or text data but want to build robust models for sentiment analysis, translation, text summarization, or intent detection.
- Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing Across Vehicles: Autonomous vehicles constantly generate huge amounts of sensitive data, like driving behavior, routes, sensor footage, and interactions with other road users. Federated learning allows these vehicles to collaboratively train smarter models for perception, prediction and control, without ever sending raw data off the vehicle. Instead, vehicles only upload encrypted model updates, protecting users’ locations and habits while pooling learning benefits across fleets, brands, or even city-wide systems [11].
- Low-Latency, Real-Time Decision Making: In self-driving applications, latency is critical: vehicles must react instantly to dangers or changes on the road. Federated learning can train edge-deployed models at RSUs (Road Side Units), on-board units, or within platoons to deliver up-to-date, highly adaptive driving policies in real time.
4. Complementarity
- Bandwidth relief: EC minimizes wide-area transfers while FL transmits model deltas instead of raw data, further reducing backbone load.
- Privacy and compliance: EC reduces exposure windows; FL keeps data on-device and augments with secure aggregation and differential privacy for additional protections [30].
5. Advantages and Challenges
5.1. Advantages
- Reduced Communication and Efficient Bandwidth Usage: In FL, only the necessary model parameters or gradients are communicated between devices and the server, reducing data sent over bandwidth-limited or costly networks.
5.2. Challenges
6. Discussion—Research Gaps
6.1. Federated Learning
6.2. Edge Computing
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nain, G.; Pattanaik, K.K.; Sharma, G.K. Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 62, 588–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Dong, N.; Li, W.; Cao, J. Edge Computing with Artificial Intelligence: A Machine Learning Perspective. ACM Comput. Surv. 2023, 55, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, K.; Liu, Y.; Meng, G.; Sun, Q. An Overview on Edge Computing Research. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 85714–85728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Han, Y.; Leung, V.C.M.; Niyato, D.; Yan, X.; Chen, X. Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 869–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W. A Survey on the Edge Computing for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 6900–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Xie, Y.; Bai, H.; Yu, B.; Li, W.; Gao, Y. A survey on federated learning. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2021, 216, 106775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, L.U.; Saad, W.; Han, Z.; Hossain, E.; Hong, C.S. Federated Learning for Internet of Things: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2021, 23, 1759–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Fan, Y.; Tse, M.; Lin, K.-Y. A review of applications in federated learning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 149, 106854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, K.M.J.; Ahmed, F.; Akhter, N.; Hasan, M.; Amin, R.; Aziz, K.E. Challenges, Applications and Design Aspects of Federated Learning: A Survey. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 124682–124700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J. From distributed machine learning to federated learning: A survey. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2022, 64, 885–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janaki, G.; Umanandhini, D. Federated Learning Approaches for Decentralized Data Processing in Edge Computing. In Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC), Trichy, India, 18–20 September 2024; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neto, H.N.C.; Hribar, J.; Dusparic, I.; Mattos, D.M.F.; Fernandes, N.C. A Survey on Securing Federated Learning: Analysis of Applications, Attacks, Challenges, and Trends. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 41928–41953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syu, J.-H.; Lin, J.C.-W.; Srivastava, G.; Yu, K. A Comprehensive Survey on Artificial Intelligence Empowered Edge Computing on Consumer Electronics. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2023, 69, 1023–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, J.; Tramel, E.; Sahu, A.K.; Wu, S.; Avestimehr, S.; Zhang, T. Federated Learning Challenges and Opportunities: An Outlook. In Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022–2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Singapore, 23–27 May 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 8752–8756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Mao, W.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xie, Y. A survey on federated learning in data mining. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. 2022, 12, e1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, G.; Teng, Y.; Wang, N.; Han, Z. Faster Convergence on Heterogeneous Federated Edge Learning: An Adaptive Clustered Data Sharing Approach. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025, 24, 5342–5356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaloforidis, N.; Kollias, K.-F.; Radoglou-Grammatikis, P.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Fragulis, G.F. Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification in Children Using Eye-Tracking Data and Machine Learning. Eng. Proc. 2025, 107, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathesh, M.; Ramakrishnan, K.; Raja, M.; Kalaiarasi, K.; Balamurugan, M. Edge Computing Integration in IoT Networks for Real-Time Data Processing. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Cybernation and Computation (CYBERCOM), Dehradun, India, 15–16 November 2024; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choumpaev, A.; Moysis, L.; Lawnik, M.; Fragulis, G. A Generalized Chaotic Neural Network Model for Epilepsy Using Soboleva Hyperbolic Tangent Functions. In 2025 14th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Kafetzis, I.; Hann, A.; Fragulis, G.F. Efficient Selection of Rare Pathology Samples from Unlabeled Medical Data via Deep Active Learning. In 2025 14th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Moysis, L.; Lawnik, M.; Kollias, K.; Baptista, M.; Goudos, S.; Fragulis, G. Dynamic analysis of a generalized attention deficit disorder model with Soboleva activation functions. Chaos An. Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2025, 35, 083105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, L.U.; Yaqoob, I.; Tran, N.H.; Kazmi, S.M.A.; Dang, T.N.; Hong, C.S. Edge-Computing-Enabled Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 10200–10232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolapo, R.; Kawu, F.M.; Abdulmalik, A.D.; Edem, U.A.; Young, M.A.; Mordi, E.C. Edge computing: Revolutionizing data processing for IoT applications. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 2024, 13, 023–029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulos, C.; Kollias, K.-F.; Fragulis, G.F. Recent advancements in federated learning: State of the art, fundamentals, principles, IoT applications and future trends. Future Internet 2024, 16, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siniosoglou, I.; Argyriou, V.; Lagkas, T.; Moscholios, I.; Fragulis, G.; Sarigiannidis, P. Unsupervised bias evaluation of dnns in non-iid federated learning through latent micro-manifolds. In IEEE INFOCOM 2022—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS); IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Siniosoglou, I.; Argyriou, V.; Fragulis, G.; Fouliras, P.; Papadopoulos, G.T.; Lytos, A.; Sarigiannidis, P. Applied federated model personalization in the industrial domain: A comparative study. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2024, 6, 3192–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makris, I.; Lytos, A.; Kyranou, K.; Argyriou, V.; Lagkas, T.; Kollias, K.-F.; Fragoulis, G.F.; Sarigianndis, P. Detecting personal protective equipment (PPE) utilising YOLOv8 in a federated learning environment. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing: Melville, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Shaheen, M.; Farooq, M.S.; Umer, T.; Kim, B.-S. Applications of Federated Learning; Taxonomy, Challenges, and Research Trends. Electronics 2022, 11, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nevrataki, T.; Iliadou, A.; Ntolkeras, G.; Sfakianakis, I.; Lazaridis, L.; Maraslidis, G.; Asimopoulos, N.; Fragulis, G.F. A survey on federated learning applications in healthcare, finance, and data privacy/data security. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2023; p. 120015. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, W.Y.B.; Luong, N.C.; Hoang, D.T.; Jiao, Y.; Liang, Y.-C.; Yang, Q.; Niyato, D.; Miao, C. Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2031–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, L.; Wang, Z.; Sun, L.; Yu, P.S.; Brinton, C.G. Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspective. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 34617–34638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, T.; Chi, J.; Zhou, X.; Ning, Z.; Atiquzzaman, M.; Wu, D.O. Edge Computing in Industrial Internet of Things: Architecture, Advances and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2462–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haibeh, L.A.; Yagoub, M.C.E.; Jarray, A. A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing Infrastructure: Design, Resource Management, and Optimization Approaches. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 27591–27610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cp, V.; Ba, V.; Zulfaquar, S. Edge Computing Assisted Pothole Detection and Lane Identification Augmented by Federated Learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on IoT Based Control Networks and Intelligent Systems (ICICNIS), Bengaluru, India, 17–18 December 2024; pp. 1549–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zhu, L.; Li, W. Cloud–Edge–End Collaborative Federated Learning: Enhancing Model Accuracy and Privacy in Non-IID Environments. Sensors 2024, 24, 8028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boruga, D.; Bolintineanu, D.; Racates, G.I. Federated learning in edge computing: Enhancing data privacy and efficiency in resource-constrained environments. World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2024, 13, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mughal, F.R. Adaptive federated learning for resource-constrained IoT devices through edge intelligence and multi-edge clustering. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.; Tuor, T.; Salonidis, T.; Leung, K.K.; Makaya, C.; He, T.; Chan, K. Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systems. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1804.05271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Song, X.; Zhang, C.; Yu, S. Challenges and future directions of secure federated learning: A survey. Front. Comput. Sci. 2022, 16, 165817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Nevrataki, T.; Radoglou-Grammatikis, P.; Sarigiannidis, A.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Fragulis, G.F. A Survey on Federated Learning and Edge Computing: Applications, Advantages, and Challenges. Eng. Proc. 2026, 143, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143039
Nevrataki T, Radoglou-Grammatikis P, Sarigiannidis A, Sarigiannidis P, Fragulis GF. A Survey on Federated Learning and Edge Computing: Applications, Advantages, and Challenges. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 143(1):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143039
Chicago/Turabian StyleNevrataki, Theodora, Panagiotis Radoglou-Grammatikis, Antonios Sarigiannidis, Panagiotis Sarigiannidis, and George F. Fragulis. 2026. "A Survey on Federated Learning and Edge Computing: Applications, Advantages, and Challenges" Engineering Proceedings 143, no. 1: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143039
APA StyleNevrataki, T., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., Sarigiannidis, A., Sarigiannidis, P., & Fragulis, G. F. (2026). A Survey on Federated Learning and Edge Computing: Applications, Advantages, and Challenges. Engineering Proceedings, 143(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026143039

