Next Article in Journal
Integrating Internet with Long-Term Care Management Policy with the Internet
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of YOLOv11: Nano, Small, and Medium Models for Herbal Leaf Classification
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 103
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2025103031
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Teen-Hang Meen
1,
Chun-Yen Chang
2,* and
Cheng-Fu Yang
3,4,*
1
Department of Electronic Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin 632, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
3
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan
4
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
All proceeding papers published in this volume were presented at the 8th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2025, Bali, Indonesia, 7–9 February 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 103(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025103031
Published: 23 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 8th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2025)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings of the 8th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2025 (ECEI 2025) to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: 2–3 reviews by double-blind;
  • Conference submission management system: online submission system on conference homepage;
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 152;
  • Number of submissions accepted: 35;
  • Acceptance rate: 0.23;
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 50;
  • Any additional information on the review process: Please refer to Figure 1.
Engproc 103 00031 g001
Figure 1. Review process for conference proceedings of the 8th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2025 (ECEI 2025).
Figure 1. Review process for conference proceedings of the 8th Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2025 (ECEI 2025).
Engproc 103 00031 g001

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meen, T.-H.; Chang, C.-Y.; Yang, C.-F. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 103, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025103031

AMA Style

Meen T-H, Chang C-Y, Yang C-F. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 103(1):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025103031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meen, Teen-Hang, Chun-Yen Chang, and Cheng-Fu Yang. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 103, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025103031

APA Style

Meen, T.-H., Chang, C.-Y., & Yang, C.-F. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 103(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025103031

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop